DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Copy As of 4/26/16 SHIAWASSEE COUNTY PARKS, RECREATION and OPEN SPACE PLAN 2016-2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Draft Copy as of 4/26/16 SHIAWASSEE COUNTY PARKS, RECREATION and OPEN SPACE PLAN 2016-2020 Shiawassee County Five-Year Parks Recreation and Open Space Plan 2016-2020 1 DEDICATION AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan is dedicated to the citizens of Shiawassee County and to all the visitors and tourists who wish to engage the outdoors of our country scenic landscape through the use of our County Parks and all of the other spacious and well-equipped public recreational outlets available in our County community. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: SHIAWASSEE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS The Shiawassee County Board of Commissioners provided the funding for a new Plan and will oversee the public hearings, adoption and future budgeting processes. The elected members are: Hartman Aue, Owosso Chair-District 1 John Horvath, Owosso District 2 Gary Holzhausen, Owosso/Corunna District 3 Les Schneider, Durand District 4 Jeremy Root, Byron District 5 Jeffrey Bartz, Owosso Vice Chair-District 6 John Plowman, Perry District 7 SHIAWASSEE COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION The Commission guided the planning process and provided oversight for the public input phase of the project. Year to year the Commission proposes a budget, elects officers, oversees park operations, secures philanthropy and volunteerism, and schedules improvements. The appointed members are: Cody Baker, Owosso Chair, At-Large Appointee Tony Newman, Corunna Vice-Chair/Shiawassee County Drain Commissioner Bonnie Reno, Corunna Secretary, At-Large Appointee Robert Downer, Bancroft At-Large Appointee Jeffrey Bartz, Owosso County Commissioners Representative Larry Johnson, Perry At-Large Appointee (Shiawassee County Health Department) Chris Klawuhn, Owosso At-Large Appointee Tina Tuller At-Large Appointee Vacant Position Planning Commission Representative (formerly Robert Ebmeyer) Brent Friess, Corunna Shiawassee County Road Commission [Note: The above Road Commission appointment is distributed among the three Road Commissioners who alternate attendance at meetings:] Mike Constine, Ovid Shiawassee County Road Commissioner John Michalec, Owosso Shiawassee County Road Commissioner Steve Zemcik, Owosso Shiawassee County Road Commissioner CONSULTANTS AND STAFF ASSISTANCE Principal Consultant: Phil Hathaway, Town Plans LLC, Owosso Assisting Consultant: Doug Schultz, Rowe Professional Services, Flint Julie Hebert Executive Assistant, Shiawassee County Board of Commissioners Tim Hill Shiawassee County Buildings and Grounds Superintendent 2 INTRODUCTION TO THE PLAN On August 20, 2015, the Shiawassee County Board of Commissioners authorized funding for the Shiawassee County Parks and Recreation Commission’s preparation of a Parks and Recreation Plan. An adopted plan becomes the template for achieving the goals, objectives and actions stated in the plan. Information gathering and public input is part of the process. Park facilities, conditions and needs will be evaluated in the Plan. To accomplish these plan elements, the Commission has been assisted in the Plan preparation with Town Plans LLC of Owosso and Rowe Engineering of Flint, Michigan. The timing of the planning process leads to a 2016 adoption date. The discipline of the planning process offers a way to look at the parks with fresh eyes. It has been many years since the County has engaged with parks planning. There is a context for the planning process that identifies five influences: 1) Compelling challenges for maintenance precede park system growth. 2) Another influence is the pending removal of the remnants of the dam at Shiatown County Park and the resultant return to a natural flow of the Shiawassee River since its first impoundment in 1840. A new site plan is needed to respond to the riverside alterations and other new objectives for that park. 3) There is a third interest arising in Shiawassee County and that is the interconnections between all open public and quasi-public spaces. Cities, Villages, State-owned land and non-profits special use areas abound in this 535 square-mile area. A regional perspective assists in the understanding of the existing and potential roles of leisure pursuits in the public realm. An appreciation of the physical connections roadways and trails offer open new perspectives and patterns of open space use for the health and vigor of the area’s population. 4) A fourth interest is to establish Shiawassee County’s eligibility for matching grant programs, principally the Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund and the federally funded (through the State of Michigan) Land and Water Conservation Fund. The Plan will identify other resources that may become available from the influence of an adopted comprehensive parks and recreation plan. Marketing opportunities for philanthropy and volunteerism will enter into the implementation phase of planning. 5) A step back from the details of county park planning offers a vision of a profound resource and that is the river focus of five of the park system’s seven parks. The Shiawassee River courses over 41 lineal miles in Shiawassee County. The strategic location of the county parks not only offer rural open space recreation, but provide quality access to the increasingly popular fishing and paddling outings for residents and visitors. The Plan endorses the establishment of a National Park Service designation for a National River Trail. In 2016, Shiawassee County is recognizing the 200th anniversary of the first European-based settlement, an event based on river transportation and resources derived from this accommodating waterway. A repeating theme in the Plan is to view the parks in many ways for the benefits they offer. Quality of life, for the past 15 years has become a common measure of community sustenance. Parks hold a distinction in cultural economic development, alleviation of social problems, physical and mental health benefits, and environmental/civic stewardship. The Plan will point out these benefits throughout and offer substantial reason for continued support for the role County government and the Shiawassee community of individuals and organizations plays in the well-being of the existing resource and the planned advances of its park system. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE # Section I. Integrated Community Planning 4 Section II. Community Description Influences on the Parks Plan 4 A. Demographic Characteristics 4 B. Physical Characteristics 5 C. Transportation Conditions 7 D. The Local Economy, Physical Characteristics, Public Health, Housing 9 E. Greenways, Open Space and Conservation Areas 9 Section III. Administrative Structure 11 A. Department Services & Organizational Chart 11 B. Current and Projected Budget 11 C. Volunteers 12 D. Relationships with Other Public and Quasi-Public Entities 12 Section IV. Inventory of Existing Parks, Natural Areas, and Recreation Facilities 14 A. Regional Parks and Recreation Facilities—Public Parks 15 B. Special Recreation Facilities 16 C. The County Parks—Description and Facilities Inventory 19 D. Shiawassee County Open Space and Recreation Map 28 Section V. Planning Methods 29 A. Comparison of Park Facilities and Types to Suggested Recreation Standards 29 B. Public Input Process and Reports from Input Sources 32 C. Translation of Standards, Public Input, and Inventory Data to Needs D. Criteria for Facility Expansion and Open Space Acquisition 35 Section VII. Goals-Objectives Actions; CIP Chart; Plan Upgrades Chart 39 A. The Ten Goals with Objectives and Action Plans 39 B. Park Improvements Spreadsheet for Costs, Ranking, Scheduling & Funding Sources 47 C. List of Park Facilities and Operational Upgrades by Category of Activity 51 Section VIII. Local Adoption 53 Section IX. Appendix 54 A. Population, Economy and Social-Cultural Trends & Projections 55 B. Municipal Park Facilities Chart, Except County Parks 57 C. County Park Facilities Chart 58 D. Park Facilities—Suggested Standards Chart 59 E. School Park Facilities Chart 62 F. Municipal Park Types and Standards Chart 63 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) TITLE PAGE # G. County and State Park Types/Standards Chart 64 H. Other Michigan County Park Systems—Comparisons Chart 65 I. County Park Map Sketches With Site Improvements Listed 66 a. Shiatown Park – West Side 66 b. Kerby Road Park 67 c. Henderson Road Park 68 d. Lytle Road Park 69 e. Geeck Road Park 70 f. Pine Grove Park 71 g. Arthur Davis Roadside County Park 72 h. Proposed West Haven Park 73 J. Accessibility Guidelines and Park Facilities Evaluation 74 K. Recreational and Destination Bike Routes to and from County Parks 78 L. Shiawassee River’s Fishing Resources 81 M. Shiawassee River Heritage Trail Paddle Boating Guide 83 N. The Requirements for an N.P.S. National Water Trail 84 O. Economic and Health Benefits of Trails 85 P. Shiatown County Park Site Plans 89 Q. Funding Resources for Parks Development 98 R. Philanthropic, Gift and Volunteerism Opportunities 100 S. Grant Close-Out Report—Pine Grove County Park 92 T. Grant Close-Out Report—Henderson County Park 95 U. Plan Certification Checklist 102 The Shiawassee River rises to prominence in the 2016 Plan. 5 SECTION I. INTEGRATED COMMUNITY PLANNING The five-year recreation plan will integrate community planning efforts county-wide to better define the role and opportunities present with the existing and future county park system. With five cities and six villages and three urbanizing townships within Shiawassee County, recreation is widely recognized as part of community life with a number of facilities and open spaces to serve the public.
Recommended publications
  • Saginaw River/Bay Fish & Wildlife Habitat BUI Removal Documentation

    Saginaw River/Bay Fish & Wildlife Habitat BUI Removal Documentation

    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 5 77 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD CHICAGO, IL 60604-3590 6 MAY 2014 REPLY TO THE ATTENTION OF Mr. Roger Eberhardt Acting Deputy Director, Office of the Great Lakes Michigan Department of Environmental Quality 525 West Allegan P.O. Box 30473 Lansing, Michigan 48909-7773 Dear Roger: Thank you for your February 6, 2014, request to remove the "Loss of Fish and Wildlife Habitat" Beneficial Use Impairment (BUI) from the Saginaw River/Bay Area of Concern (AOC) in Michigan, As you know, we share your desire to restore all of the Great Lakes AOCs and to formally delist them. Based upon a review of your submittal and the supporting data, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency hereby approves your BUI removal request for the Saginaw River/Bay AOC, EPA will notify the International Joint Commission of this significant positive environmental change at this AOC. We congratulate you and your staff, as well as the many federal, state, and local partners who have worked so hard and been instrumental in achieving this important environmental improvement. Removal of this BUI will benefit not only the people who live and work in the Saginaw River/Bay AOC, but all the residents of Michigan and the Great Lakes basin as well. We look forward to the continuation of this important and productive relationship with your agency and the local coordinating committee as we work together to fully restore all of Michigan's AOCs. If you have any further questions, please contact me at (312) 353-4891, or your staff may contact John Perrecone, at (312) 353-1149.
  • Flint River Flood Mitigation Alternatives Saginaw County, Michigan

    Flint River Flood Mitigation Alternatives Saginaw County, Michigan

    Draft Environmental Assessment Flint River Flood Mitigation Alternatives Saginaw County, Michigan Flint River Erosion Control Board FEMA-DR-1346-MI, HMGP Project No. A1346.53 April 2006 U.S. Department of Homeland Security FEMA Region V 536 South Clark Street, Sixth Floor Chicago, IL 60605 This document was prepared by URS Group, Inc. 200 Orchard Ridge Drive, Suite 101 Gaithersburg, MD 20878 Contract No. EMW-2000-CO-0246, Task Order No. 138. Job No. 15292488.00100 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Acronyms ........................................................................................................................................ iii Section 1 ONE Introduction........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Project Authority..........................................................................................1 1.2 Project Location and Setting........................................................................1 1.3 Purpose and Need ........................................................................................2 Section 2 TWO Alternative Analysis .......................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Alternative 1 – No Action Alternative.........................................................3 2.2 Alternative 2 – Dike Reconstruction and Reservoir Construction (Proposed Action) ........................................................................................3 2.2.1 Project Segment
  • Thompson Lake Livingston County, T3N R4E,5E Section 25, 30, 31,36 Shiawassee River Watershed

    Thompson Lake Livingston County, T3N R4E,5E Section 25, 30, 31,36 Shiawassee River Watershed

    Michigan Department of Natural Resources 2006-21 Status of the Fishery Resource Report Page 1 Thompson Lake Livingston County, T3N R4E,5E Section 25, 30, 31,36 Shiawassee River Watershed Joseph M. Leonardi Environment Thompson Lake is located in the city limits of Howell in central Livingston County. It is an impoundment of Alger Creek, a tributary to Bogue Creek, which drains to the South Branch Shiawassee River. The South Branch Shiawassee River flows northerly to the mainstem Shiawassee River and to the Saginaw River and Lake Huron. The Howell area lies within the Ionia district of the Southern Lower Michigan Regional Landscape Ecosystem and is characterized by features identified in the Lansing sub-district (Albert 1995). The Lansing sub-district is described as gently sloping ground moraine broke by outwash channels and numerous end-moraine ridges. Undulating topography formed alternating well drained rises and poorly drained depressions of variable soils. Soils on raised moraines generally consist of medium texture sand and loam while depressions along end moraine ridges are typically fine texture, high in organic content. Outwash channels developed by glacial retreat generally formed the river and stream drainage pattern of the watershed. Shiawassee River basin groundwater and surface water patterns follow geological soils types. Medium textured soils found in the Howell area allow for greater permeability and hydraulic head pressure (groundwater elevation) resulting in groundwater deposits. Most groundwater deposits in the Shiawassee River watershed are largely concentrated in southern and southeastern portions where Thompson Lake is located (Cooper 2005). Groundwater inflow to Thompson Lake provides a stable water source necessary to maintain the aquatic ecosystem.
  • Shiatown Dam Assessment: Guiding a Community Decision for Action

    Shiatown Dam Assessment: Guiding a Community Decision for Action

    SHIATOWN DAM ASSESSMENT: GUIDING A COMMUNITY DECISION FOR ACTION PREPARED FOR: FRIENDS OF THE SHIAWASSEE RIVER BY: DAVID CHADWICK MEGAN HEARNE MICHAEL SCHULLER JOSEPH SHORT A PROJECT SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT APRIL 2003 FACULTY ADVISORS: ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR MICHAEL MOORE ADJUNCT PROFESSOR PAUL SEELBACH Abstract The Shiatown Dam is in disrepair and potentially threatens life and property. It nearly failed during a high water event in February 2001. Shiatown Dam is a run-of-the-river structure in the Shiawassee River, a low gradient, warm water river that drains 1260 square miles of central Michigan. The dam no longer serves an economic purpose, and many of the recreational benefits of the impoundment have disappeared as a result of dam deterioration, sedimentation and poor water quality. County residents and the owner, the Michigan Department of Natural Resources, agree that action is necessary to prevent failure of the dam and to restore the value of the site. We defined the relative merits of dam repair, replacement, and removal by conducting ecological, social, and economic assessments at local and watershed levels. The cornerstone of our social assessment was a mail survey of 1500 people with a 43% response rate. Respondents greatly value the dam and river for historic significance and passive recreational opportunities. Survey results show 78% support restoring the dam despite known problems at the site. The Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, dam safety regulator for the state, has recommended major repairs for all parts of the dam.
  • PARKS, RECREATION and OPEN SPACE PLAN 2017-2021

    PARKS, RECREATION and OPEN SPACE PLAN 2017-2021

    SHIAWASSEE COUNTY PARKS, RECREATION and OPEN SPACE PLAN 2017-2021 Shiawassee County Five-Year Parks Recreation and Open Space Plan 2017-2021 1 DEDICATION AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan is dedicated to the citizens of Shiawassee County and to all the visitors and tourists who wish to engage the outdoors of our country scenic landscape through the use of our County Parks and all of the other spacious and well-equipped public recreational outlets available in our County community. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: SHIAWASSEE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS The Shiawassee County Board of Commissioners provided the funding for a new Plan and will oversee the public hearings, adoption and future budgeting processes. The elected members are: Hartmann Aue, Owosso Chair-District 1 John Horvath, Owosso District 2 Gary Holzhausen, Owosso/Corunna District 3 Les Schneider, Durand District 4 Jeremy Root, Byron District 5 Jeff Bartz, Owosso Vice-Chair & District 6 John Plowman, Perry District 7 SHIAWASSEE COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION The Commission guided the planning process and provided oversight for the public input phase of the project. Year to year the Commission proposes a budget, elects officers, oversees park operations, secures philanthropy and volunteerism, and schedules improvements. The appointed members are: Cody Baker, Owosso Chair, At-Large Appointee Tony Newman, Corunna Vice-Chair/Shiawassee County Drain Commissioner Bonnie Reno, Corunna Secretary, At-Large Appointee Robert Downer, Bancroft At-Large Appointee
  • Advances in Agricultural Drainage

    Advances in Agricultural Drainage

    2 Shiawassee Conservation District Annual Report • Sunday, February 18, 2018 Shiawassee Conservation District Annual Report • Sunday, February 18, 2018 3 Controlled drainage, or drainage water management, Advances in uses a control structure to manage the level of water above the tile line. The control structure is placed close Agricultural Drainage to the outlet and water levels are controlled by adding Drainage has been part of U.S. agriculture since co- or removing “stop logs” or by the use of flow valves. lonial times, but it expanded to a broad scale when A field is typically divided into “drainage management Europeans settled the Midwest. At that time, large zones,” each managed by one control structure. Ideally, proportions of Michigan were swampland unsuited for the field should be flat (generally less than 0.5 percent normal cultivation. Most of the drainage occurred in slope) so that one structure can manage the water table the late 1800s and early 1900s. within 1 to 2 feet for as many acres as possible. If drain- The purpose of drainage is to remove excess water age laterals are installed on the contour, the practice and lower the water table. This creates a well-aerated could be used with greater slopes, but flatter fields re- environment for roots and soil organisms. Drainage al- quire fewer overall structures and allow each structure lows earlier warming of soil in the spring, and earlier to manage a larger area. traffic on fields. Installation of drainage tiles can have Drainage water management can be helpful for keep- a rapid and large return on the capital investment, by ing nutrients in the field by limiting runoff of subsur- substantially improving productivity.
  • (PFAS) in the Saginaw River Watershed: Surface Water Sampling October 2019

    (PFAS) in the Saginaw River Watershed: Surface Water Sampling October 2019

    Investigation of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in the Saginaw River Watershed: Surface Water Sampling October 2019 Perfluorinated and polyfluorinated alkyl substances (PFAS) are a very large class of man-made organic chemicals that have been used in numerous industrial processes and consumer products for over 60 years. Validated analytical methods are available for relatively few of the thousands of compounds. Much of the environmental monitoring of PFAS in Michigan has focused on measuring only perfluorinated chemicals. Many PFAS are persistent, some bioaccumulate in the environment, and several are toxic to mammals and/or birds in laboratory tests. The toxicities of most PFAS have not been evaluated. Two perfluorinated compounds; perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), have been the subject of the most toxicological work and environmental monitoring. Both compounds were manufactured intentionally, but they can also be generated as byproducts when other fluorinated compounds break down. In addition, several PFAS are key ingredients in fire-fighting foams. These foams have been used extensively in fire training exercises at military bases nation-wide; in recent years PFAS have been detected in surface and groundwater near many military facilities. Many products containing PFAS are used in numerous industrial processes including metal plating, textile production and treatment, and specialty paper production. Industrial and domestic waste containing these compounds can enter the environment through municipal or private waste treatment systems, stormwater runoff, venting groundwater, or as deposition after emissions into the atmosphere. Both PFOS and PFOA have been measured in surface waters across the state, and PFOS has been detected in most fish tissue samples from Michigan waters that have been analyzed for PFAS.
  • Indian Dave Article

    Indian Dave Article

    INDIAN DAVE The following are two newspaper articles on Indian Dave and an obituary. All from local newspapers. Three different sons are mentioned in the articles. Bill, John and James. --Dave Celani 05-10-1907 Vassar Times MORE ABOUT INDIAN DAVE Followed by his faithful son, "John" old "Indian Dave" as he is so familiarly known throughout the length and breadth of Tuscola county stepped into Vassar about noon Tuesday covered with mud and slush. Dave earned a huddle of bows, arrows, whip stalks and gun-wipers all made of the very best grade of hickory, which he endeavored to sell about town. John carried a sack containing the carcasses of a couple of muskrats, a number of hides and several traps. The inseparable pair, upon reaching the city made a bee-line for a place that served free lunch where they filled up, but owing to the exactness of the law, were unable to obtain a drop of liquor of any kind with which to wash down their eatables. Wednesday they started for Tuscola where Dave claims to have a canoe that he hides in a certain place and is always able to find when His eyes are still as bright, his step as quick and wanted. He does not think that a person has ever yet firm, and his glossy hair as black as when he discovered its hiding place. He will spend the next followed his chieftain father, as his son now follows few weeks trapping along the river from Tuscola to him, single file, through the primeval forests before the Shiawassee river and will do some fishing on the sound of the settlers ax and the hum of the white the side.
  • The Shiawassee River Canoe/Kayak Guide January 2, 2017

    The Shiawassee River Canoe/Kayak Guide January 2, 2017

    The Shiawassee River Canoe/Kayak Guide January 2, 2017 Author: Phil Hathaway, and Member— Friends of the Shiawassee River For Its Course Principally through Shiawassee County, Michigan General Information. The Shiawassee River corridor has been called a “country scenic” valley with farm fields and forested flood plains and embankments forming the landscape. With a few exceptions, the Shiawassee River’s course in Shiawassee County is great for beginners with some interesting riffles and obstructions in the way of rocks and tree falls that provide a challenge for some. Frequent changes in the river height from storms or spring melt raise the navigation conditions to intermediate and advanced status and these high water periods are not recommended for beginners. There are six impoundments/dams along the way: Shiatown (partially dismantled and now 4 feet high, removal in summer, 2017), Corunna (5 feet high; removal summer, 2017), Parshallburg (partially dismantled) the Byron Mill Pond Dam, and the three impoundments (“weirs”) in Owosso. Only the Owosso weirs and Parshallburg impoundments are navigable and are recommended for canoeists with some experience. All the impoundment structures may be portaged with the temporary exceptions of the Shiatown and Corunna dams that will be removed. Another obstruction, a concrete deck, is located upstream from Corunna at the brick factory site and requires a sweep to the south embankment to navigate through a properly sized culvert. Except for flood stage or high water, the boating season is year-round for the hardiest. The ‘ordinary person’ season extends from mid-April to late October with a pre-trip check advised on low flow conditions that can occur anytime.
  • Restoring the Shiawassee Flats

    Restoring the Shiawassee Flats

    UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF NATURAL RESOURCES & ENVIRONMENT Restoring the Shiawassee Flats Estuarine Gateway to Saginaw Bay Prepared by: Janet Buchanan, Seta Chorbajian, Andrea Dominguez, Brandon Hartleben, Brianna Knoppow, Joshua Miller, Caitlin Schulze, Cecilia Seiter with historical land use analyses by Yohan Chang A project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science at the University of Michigan April 2013 Client: Shiawassee National Wildlife Refuge Faculty advisors: Dr. Michael J. Wiley, Dr. Sara Adlerstein-Gonzalez, Dr. Kurt Kowalski (USGS-GLSC) Preface In 2011, the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and Ducks Unlimited received a $1.5 million Sustain Our Great Lakes grant for the first phase of a wetland restoration project at the Shiawassee National Wildlife Refuge, outside Saginaw, Michigan. The ambitious project seeks to hydrologically reconnect a 2,260-acre complex of bottomland farm fields and diked wetlands to the dynamic river systems surrounding the Refuge. The goals of this restoration are to provide fish, birds, and insects with access to a large, restored wetland complex both through hydrologic reconnection and wetland restoration; and to contribute to the delisting of at least three of the Beneficial Use Impairments in the Saginaw River/Bay Area of Concern, just downstream of the Refuge. Phase I of the restoration project involves the conversion of 940 acres of former farmland, now owned by the Refuge, to ecologically productive wetland, and its hydrologic reconnection to the Shiawassee and Flint Rivers. The grant for Phase I included enough funds to complete the design, engineering, and implementation of the project.
  • Status of the Fishery Resource Report, 2016-220, Shiawassee River

    Status of the Fishery Resource Report, 2016-220, Shiawassee River

    Michigan Dept. of Natural Resources 2016-220 Status of the Fishery Resource Report Page 1 Shiawassee River - Chesaning Rock Ramp Saginaw County, T09N/R03E/S16 Shiawassee River Watershed Joseph M. Leonardi, Fisheries Biologist Environment The Shiawassee River is one of four principle tributaries of the Saginaw River located in southeast Michigan (Figure 1). Originating in Oakland County, the Shiawassee River flows northerly for 110 miles before it joins the Flint, Cass, and Tittabawasee rivers to form the Saginaw River. The Saginaw River flows to Saginaw Bay of Lake Huron. The Village of Chesaning is located on the Shiawassee River in southern Saginaw County approximately 15 miles upstream of its confluence with the Saginaw River (Figure 1). Chesaning is a semi-rural community with a population of approximately 2,500. Residential housing, small businesses, and recreational park populate the 3 square mile Village limits. Agriculture dominates landuse outside of the Village limits. History Chesaning Dam was a centerpiece for the Village and enabled navigation of the Chesaning Showboat in the upstream impoundment giving credence to the Village moniker as "Showboat City". Since 1937, the Village hosted the "Chesaning Showboat Festival" which was key to the community's cultural identity and economic vitality. Chesaning Dam was built in 1863 for grist mill operations. The dam was a fixed crest "rock-crib" style structure covered with concrete and spanned 211 feet. The dam had a structural height of 9 feet and impounded an estimated 17 acres of water. Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) classified it as a low hazard dam. Current Status Although Chesaning Dam had been in need of repair for a number of years, conditions worsened in March 2005 when a center portion collapsed requiring emergency repair (Figure 2).
  • Shiawassee County, Michigan (All Jurisdictions)

    Shiawassee County, Michigan (All Jurisdictions)

    SHIAWASSEE COUNTY, MICHIGAN (ALL JURISDICTIONS) Community Community Community Community Name Number Name Number *ANTRIM, TOWNSHIP OF 261162 NEW LOTHROP, VILLAGE OF 260924 BANCROFT, VILLAGE OF 260520 *OVID, VILLAGE OF 260318 BENNINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF 261163 OWOSSO, CHARTER 260809 BURNS, TOWNSHIP OF 260762 TOWNSHIP OF BYRON, VILLAGE OF 260601 OWOSSO, CITY OF 260596 CALEDONIA, CHARTER 260300 *PERRY, CITY OF 261182 TOWNSHIP OF *PERRY, TOWNSHIP OF 261156 CORUNNA, CITY OF 260602 RUSH TOWNSHIP OF 260522 *DURAND, CITY OF 261181 *SCIOTA, TOWNSHIP OF 261157 *FAIRFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF 261164 SHIAWASSEE, 260523 HAZELTON, TOWNSHIP OF 260925 TOWNSHIP OF Shiawassee County *LAINGSBURG, CITY OF 260950 VENICE, TOWNSHIP OF 261158 *LENNON, VILLAGE OF 261183 VERNON, TOWNSHIP OF 261159 MIDDLEBURY, TOWNSHIP OF 261155 VERNON, VILLAGE OF 260524 *MORRICE, VILLAGE OF 261184 *WOODHULL, 261160 NEW HAVEN, TOWNSHIP OF 260521 TOWNSHIP OF *No Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified Preliminary: FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 26155CV000A NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report may not contain all data available within the Community Map Repository. Please contact the Community Map Repository for any additional data. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) may revise and republish part or all of this FIS report at any time. In addition, FEMA may revise part of this FIS report by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS report. Therefore, users should consult with community officials and check the Community Map Repository to obtain the most current FIS report components.