DOCSLIB.ORG

Restoring the Shiawassee Flats

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Restoring the Shiawassee Flats UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF NATURAL RESOURCES & ENVIRONMENT Restoring the Shiawassee Flats Estuarine Gateway to Saginaw Bay Prepared by: Janet Buchanan, Seta Chorbajian, Andrea Dominguez, Brandon Hartleben, Brianna Knoppow, Joshua Miller, Caitlin Schulze, Cecilia Seiter with historical land use analyses by Yohan Chang A project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science at the University of Michigan April 2013 Client: Shiawassee National Wildlife Refuge Faculty advisors: Dr. Michael J. Wiley, Dr. Sara Adlerstein-Gonzalez, Dr. Kurt Kowalski (USGS-GLSC) Preface In 2011, the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and Ducks Unlimited received a $1.5 million Sustain Our Great Lakes grant for the first phase of a wetland restoration project at the Shiawassee National Wildlife Refuge, outside Saginaw, Michigan. The ambitious project seeks to hydrologically reconnect a 2,260-acre complex of bottomland farm fields and diked wetlands to the dynamic river systems surrounding the Refuge. The goals of this restoration are to provide fish, birds, and insects with access to a large, restored wetland complex both through hydrologic reconnection and wetland restoration; and to contribute to the delisting of at least three of the Beneficial Use Impairments in the Saginaw River/Bay Area of Concern, just downstream of the Refuge. Phase I of the restoration project involves the conversion of 940 acres of former farmland, now owned by the Refuge, to ecologically productive wetland, and its hydrologic reconnection to the Shiawassee and Flint Rivers. The grant for Phase I included enough funds to complete the design, engineering, and implementation of the project. However, there were no funds allocated for pre-or post-construction monitoring, nor was it clear how the restoration work would be evaluated after its completion. The Refuge recognized that ecological monitoring of a restored area is vital for evaluating the progress of the restoration toward its stated ecological goals, such as increasing fish populations, lowering water pollutant levels, and increasing biological productivity. In early 2012, Refuge and USGS staff proposed a project to the University of Michigan’s School of Natural Resources & Environment which would involve gathering baseline ecological data at the restoration site, providing recommendations for a monitoring plan, and integrating the restoration into the history and social context of the Refuge and the Saginaw Bay region. Over the next 18 months, our team gathered data in the field, investigated past restoration projects to serve as case studies, and researched restoration and monitoring practices. The purpose of our master’s project work is to give the Refuge a larger framework from which to evaluate the efforts of Phase I of the restoration project and a framework for strategically planning future restoration. Our work provides the Refuge staff with ecological baseline data which will help them to design a strategic monitoring plan. Our work also examines case studies of restoration on National Wildlife Refuges and explores opportunities for collaboration with partners in the Saginaw Bay area. Each section of this report concludes with recommendations for the Refuge. At this writing, in April 2013, the design for Phase I of the reconnection project has been finalized and approved, and the project is moving into the permitting process. We hope that our work will aid the Refuge in designing a monitoring plan for the areas restored in Phase I, and contribute to the overall success of the restoration project. ii Acknowledgments Our master’s project team would first like to acknowledge our project advisors: Dr. Michael J. Wiley and Dr. Sara Adlerstein-Gonzalez of the University of Michigan School of Natural Resources & Environment, and Dr. Kurt Kowalski at the USGS Great Lakes Science Center, for their guidance, encouragement, tireless editing and their invaluable technical expertise. The staff of the Shiawassee National Wildlife Refuge, particularly Refuge Manager Steve Kahl, Refuge Wildlife Biologist Eric Dunton, Visitor Services Manager Lionel Grant, and Federal Wildlife Officer Ryan Pauly, provided us with access to the Refuge and its resources to perform our work. Dr. Steve Yaffee, also of the University Of Michigan School of Natural Resources & Environment, helped us in the initial project phases, and provided insight into adaptive management. The amount of field data in this project could not have been collected and analyzed by our team alone. Aubrey Scott helped us throughout the summer of 2012, and Mike Eggleston, Natalie Arnold, Zachary Aubrecht, David Rosier, Andy Layman, and Jenny Pfaff helped us complete our sampling. To analyze aquatic macroinvertebrate data, our team used rarefaction software created by Dr. Steven Holland of the UGA Stratigraphy Lab and available at http://strata.uga.edu/software/. Kyung-Seo Park provided assistance with macroinvertebrate identification. Our team also owes thanks to the many interviewees who gave of their time and expertise in fleshing out case studies of restoration on National Wildlife Refuges: John Bourgeois, Dane Cramer, Ron Huffman, Burke Jenkins, Allison Krueger, Jason Lewis, Mendel Stewart, Laura Valoppi, and Joann Van Aken. We are also deeply grateful to the interviewees from partner organizations in the Saginaw Bay area: Barb Avers, Dane Cramer, Mary Fales, Todd Hogrefe, Mike Kelly, Kurt Kowalski, Helen Taylor, and Michelle Selzer. This project was made possible by funding from the SNRE Master’s Project & Practicum fund through Rackham Graduate School, University of Michigan, the Shiawassee National Wildlife Refuge, the USGS Great Lakes Science Center, and Professor Wiley. iii Executive Summary In 2011, the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and Ducks Unlimited received a $1.5 million Sustain Our Great Lakes grant for the first phase of a wetland restoration project at the Shiawassee National Wildlife Refuge, outside Saginaw, Michigan. Phase I of the restoration seeks to reconnect 994 acres of former farmland to the natural, dynamic hydrology of the Shiawassee River, which flows through the Refuge. In 2012, staff at the Shiawassee National Wildlife Refuge contacted a team of master’s degree students at the University of Michigan School of Natural Resources and Environment and asked for an assessment of baseline conditions at the restoration site before the restoration project begins. The Refuge also asked for information about strategies used in other wetland restoration projects and about partners who might contribute to future restoration efforts at the Refuge. This report, organized into three sections, is the outcome of the team’s research. Part 1: Understanding the Past provides a brief history of the Flats and the Refuge, summarizing the key human and environmental factors which shaped their current conditions. • Saginaw County has experienced a 72% reduction in forests and a 96% reduction in wetlands since 1830. These losses were mirrored by dramatic increases in agricultural and urban land cover during this same time period. • The construction of drains, dikes, levees, and water control structures throughout the Flats has drastically altered the main channel position and sinuosity of the Shiawassee River and disrupted the natural flow regimes. The Flint and Bad Rivers also show extensive channel modifications near their confluence with the Shiawassee River. Part 2: Assessing the Present describes the current ecological conditions at the Refuge, including the restoration site, based on field data collected by the team in 2012. To collect these data, a fish community survey, an aquatic macroinvertebrate community survey, a vegetation survey, and water quality testing were conducted. • The fish community of the Shiawassee River is seasonally variable and distinct from the managed units surveyed in 2012, which exhibited a lack of migratory fishes and a predominance of sunfishes. Post-restoration fish monitoring during seasonal migrations and late summer would help evaluate improvements in richness of migratory and floodplain species within the Refuge. • The vegetation within the targeted restoration site and is primarily composed of weedy species. Annual vegetation monitoring by both ground sampling and remote sensing of community structure and composition could be used to assess changes in the plant community after restoration. • Aquatic macroinvertebrate species richness was greatest in the Grefe Pool, a currently restored and managed diked wetland. All three macrohabitats sampled for macroinvertebrates indicated a macroinvertebrate community with high tolerance to nutrient loading and low dissolved oxygen. Post-restoration monitoring could compare iv macroinvertebrate species richness in the restoration site to established wetland units like Grefe Pool. • Hydrologic analysis suggested that, during periods of low flow, significant discharge was released into the Saginaw River from storage in the wetlands of the Flats, exceeding or that measured from tributary river inputs. Further studies should be conducted to distinguish between low flow inputs from hydrologic storage in the Flats versus urban inputs from the city of Saginaw, directly downstream of the Flats. • Total reactive phosphorus loads were on average larger in the Saginaw River than the sum of phosphorus inputs from rivers entering the Saginaw. This indicates that the Flats themselves may be contributing available phosphorus to the Saginaw River, possibly due
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Docket No. FWS–HQ–NWRS–2019–0040; FXRS12610900000-190-FF09R20000]
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 09/10/2019 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2019-18054, and on govinfo.gov Billing Code 4333-15 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Parts 26, 32, 36, and 71 [Docket No. FWS–HQ–NWRS–2019–0040; FXRS12610900000-190-FF09R20000] RIN 1018-BD79 2019–2020 Station-Specific Hunting and Sport Fishing Regulations AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), open seven National Wildlife Refuges (NWRs) that are currently closed to hunting and sport fishing. In addition, we expand hunting and sport fishing at 70 other NWRs, and add pertinent station-specific regulations for other NWRs that pertain to migratory game bird hunting, upland game hunting, big game hunting, and sport fishing for the 2019–2020 season. We also formally open 15 units of the National Fish Hatchery System to hunting and sport fishing. We also add pertinent station- specific regulations that pertain to migratory game bird hunting, upland game hunting, big game hunting, and sport fishing at these 15 National Fish Hatcheries (NFHs) for the 2019–2020 season. This rule includes global administrative updates to every NWR entry in our refuge- specific regulations and the reorganization of general public use regulations. We remove approximately 2,100 regulations that will have no impact on the administration of hunting and sport fishing within the National Wildlife Refuge System. We also simplify over 2,900 refuge- specific regulations to comply with a Presidential mandate to adhere to plain language standards 1 and to reduce the regulatory burden on the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Transformation of an Industrial Brownfield Into an Ecological Buffer for Michigan’S Only Ramsar Wetland of International Importance
    OPEN ACCESS www. wsforum.org Article Transformation of an Industrial Brownfield into an Ecological Buffer for Michigan’s only Ramsar Wetland of International Importance John Hartig 1,* and Allison Krueger 2 E-Mails: [email protected]; [email protected] *Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-734-692-7608; Fax: +1-734-692-7603 Received: / Accepted: / Published: Abstract: The Detroit River International Wildlife Refuge spans 77 km along the Detroit River and western Lake Erie, and is the only international wildlife refuge in North America. A key unit of the refuge is the 166-ha Humbug Marsh that represents the last kilometer of natural shoreline on the U.S. mainland of the river and Michigan’s only “Wetland of International Importance” designated under the 1971 International Ramsar Convention. Adjacent to Humbug Marsh is an 18-ha former industrial manufacturing site (now called the Refuge Gateway) that is being remediated and restored as an ecological buffer for Humbug Marsh and the future home of the refuge’s visitor center. Restoration and redevelopment activities have included: cleanup and capping of contaminated lands; daylighting a creek and constructing a retention pond and emergent wetland to treat storm water prior to discharge to the Detroit River; restoring coastal wetland, riparian buffer, and upland habitats; and constructing two roads, hiking/biking trails, and a kayak/canoe landing to offer wildlife-compatible public uses that allow visitors to experience this internationally- recognized natural resource. This project has been described as transformational for the region by restoring an industrial brownfield into high quality wildlife habitat that expands the ecological buffer of a Ramsar site.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Item XI Ramsar COP11 DOC. 8 Report of the Secretary General
    11th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Wetlands (Ramsar, Iran, 1971) “Wetlands: home and destination” Bucharest, Romania, 6-13 July 2012 Agenda item XI Ramsar COP11 DOC. 8 Report of the Secretary General pursuant to Article 8.2 concerning the List of Wetlands of International Importance Explanatory note: This paper provides information received at the Secretariat up to 2 June 2012 which is required to be presented to COP11 under the terms of Article 8.2 of the Convention. The information provided below should be updated by Contracting Parties, if necessary, just before or during COP11 through written texts submitted to the Secretariat, and as appropriate these will then be incorporated into a revised COP11 DR 4 on “The status of sites in the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance” to be considered during COP11. Parties are requested not to repeat orally during the plenary session their written updates that have been provided to the Secretariat, “in order to save time spent on corrections and comments during plenary sessions” (Decision SC42-7). See also COP11 DOC. 3 Add.1 for further information about interventions during COP11 plenaries. 1. Article 8.2 of the text of the Convention on Wetlands states that the continuing duties of the Secretariat shall be, inter alia, “b) to maintain the List of Wetlands of International Importance and to be informed by the Contracting Parties of any additions, extensions, deletions or restrictions concerning wetlands included in the List provided in accordance
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 179/Tuesday, September 15, 2020
    Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 179 / Tuesday, September 15, 2020 / Notices 57231 of Federal Claims, the land from which Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Michigan State University is the Native American human remains Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin; Red responsible for notifying The Tribes, were removed is the aboriginal land of Lake Band of Chippewa Indians, The Consulted Tribes and Groups, and the Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Minnesota; Saginaw Chippewa Indian The Invited Tribes that this notice has Tribe of Chippewa Indians of the Bad Tribe of Michigan; Sault Ste. Marie been published. River Reservation, Wisconsin; Bay Mills Tribe of Chippewa Indians, Michigan; Dated: August 14, 2020. Sokaogon Chippewa Community, Indian Community, Michigan; Melanie O’Brien, Chippewa Cree Indians of the Rocky Wisconsin; St. Croix Chippewa Indians Manager, National NAGPRA Program. Boy’s Reservation, Montana (previously of Wisconsin; and the Turtle Mountain listed as Chippewa-Cree Indians of the Band of Chippewa Indians of North [FR Doc. 2020–20295 Filed 9–14–20; 8:45 am] Rocky Boy’s Reservation, Montana); Dakota. BILLING CODE 4312–52–P Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and • Pursuant to 43 CFR 10.11(c)(1), the disposition of the human remains may Chippewa Indians, Michigan; DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Keweenaw Bay Indian Community, be to the Bad River Band of the Lake Michigan; Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians of National Park Service Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of the Bad River Reservation, Wisconsin; Wisconsin; Lac du
    [Show full text]
  • Thompson Lake Livingston County, T3N R4E,5E Section 25, 30, 31,36 Shiawassee River Watershed
    Michigan Department of Natural Resources 2006-21 Status of the Fishery Resource Report Page 1 Thompson Lake Livingston County, T3N R4E,5E Section 25, 30, 31,36 Shiawassee River Watershed Joseph M. Leonardi Environment Thompson Lake is located in the city limits of Howell in central Livingston County. It is an impoundment of Alger Creek, a tributary to Bogue Creek, which drains to the South Branch Shiawassee River. The South Branch Shiawassee River flows northerly to the mainstem Shiawassee River and to the Saginaw River and Lake Huron. The Howell area lies within the Ionia district of the Southern Lower Michigan Regional Landscape Ecosystem and is characterized by features identified in the Lansing sub-district (Albert 1995). The Lansing sub-district is described as gently sloping ground moraine broke by outwash channels and numerous end-moraine ridges. Undulating topography formed alternating well drained rises and poorly drained depressions of variable soils. Soils on raised moraines generally consist of medium texture sand and loam while depressions along end moraine ridges are typically fine texture, high in organic content. Outwash channels developed by glacial retreat generally formed the river and stream drainage pattern of the watershed. Shiawassee River basin groundwater and surface water patterns follow geological soils types. Medium textured soils found in the Howell area allow for greater permeability and hydraulic head pressure (groundwater elevation) resulting in groundwater deposits. Most groundwater deposits in the Shiawassee River watershed are largely concentrated in southern and southeastern portions where Thompson Lake is located (Cooper 2005). Groundwater inflow to Thompson Lake provides a stable water source necessary to maintain the aquatic ecosystem.
    [Show full text]
  • Shiatown Dam Assessment: Guiding a Community Decision for Action
    SHIATOWN DAM ASSESSMENT: GUIDING A COMMUNITY DECISION FOR ACTION PREPARED FOR: FRIENDS OF THE SHIAWASSEE RIVER BY: DAVID CHADWICK MEGAN HEARNE MICHAEL SCHULLER JOSEPH SHORT A PROJECT SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT APRIL 2003 FACULTY ADVISORS: ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR MICHAEL MOORE ADJUNCT PROFESSOR PAUL SEELBACH Abstract The Shiatown Dam is in disrepair and potentially threatens life and property. It nearly failed during a high water event in February 2001. Shiatown Dam is a run-of-the-river structure in the Shiawassee River, a low gradient, warm water river that drains 1260 square miles of central Michigan. The dam no longer serves an economic purpose, and many of the recreational benefits of the impoundment have disappeared as a result of dam deterioration, sedimentation and poor water quality. County residents and the owner, the Michigan Department of Natural Resources, agree that action is necessary to prevent failure of the dam and to restore the value of the site. We defined the relative merits of dam repair, replacement, and removal by conducting ecological, social, and economic assessments at local and watershed levels. The cornerstone of our social assessment was a mail survey of 1500 people with a 43% response rate. Respondents greatly value the dam and river for historic significance and passive recreational opportunities. Survey results show 78% support restoring the dam despite known problems at the site. The Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, dam safety regulator for the state, has recommended major repairs for all parts of the dam.
    [Show full text]
  • FALL 2011/WINTER 2012 from the Public Have Been Addressed and the Plan Is Undergoing Final Revisions Needed
    HUNT PLAN UPDATE Steve Dushane, Assistant Refuge Manager The Detroit River International Wildlife Refuge hunting plan and environmental The WildSide assessment was made available for public A newsletter for the supporters of the International Wildlife Refuge Alliance and the Detroit River International Wildlife Refuge comment in 2011. Many of the comments FALL 2011/WINTER 2012 from the public have been addressed and the plan is undergoing final revisions needed. The next step will be to work on the exact language to be placed in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). It is our hope that the hunting plan will be published in the CFR in early 2012 and that hunting on the refuge will be approved by fall 2012. The Refuge is very excited and looking forward to offering hunting as an approved public use in the near future. Photo: Jerry Jourdan International Wildlife Refuge Alliance US Postage 9311 Groh Road PAID Grosse Ile, Michigan 48138 Nonprofit Organization iwralliance.org Permit #153 Wyandotte, MI In this issue: • Upcoming Events! • State of the Strait! • Big Changes at the Refuge Gateway! ...and more! Photo: Jerry Jourdan Message from the Alliance Chair: About The topics ofUrban Refuges and Landscape DRIWR Conservation Cooperatives came up at the FWS Visioning Conference, “Conserving the Future”: Wildlife & IWRA Refuges and the Next Generation held in Madison, WI The Detroit River International Wildlife Refuge (DRIWR) is this past July. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Director, Upcoming Events located along the lower Detroit River and western shoreline Updated program information can be found at www.iwralliance.org or www.fws.gov/midwest/detroitriver of Lake Erie.
    [Show full text]
  • PARKS, RECREATION and OPEN SPACE PLAN 2017-2021
    SHIAWASSEE COUNTY PARKS, RECREATION and OPEN SPACE PLAN 2017-2021 Shiawassee County Five-Year Parks Recreation and Open Space Plan 2017-2021 1 DEDICATION AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan is dedicated to the citizens of Shiawassee County and to all the visitors and tourists who wish to engage the outdoors of our country scenic landscape through the use of our County Parks and all of the other spacious and well-equipped public recreational outlets available in our County community. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: SHIAWASSEE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS The Shiawassee County Board of Commissioners provided the funding for a new Plan and will oversee the public hearings, adoption and future budgeting processes. The elected members are: Hartmann Aue, Owosso Chair-District 1 John Horvath, Owosso District 2 Gary Holzhausen, Owosso/Corunna District 3 Les Schneider, Durand District 4 Jeremy Root, Byron District 5 Jeff Bartz, Owosso Vice-Chair & District 6 John Plowman, Perry District 7 SHIAWASSEE COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION The Commission guided the planning process and provided oversight for the public input phase of the project. Year to year the Commission proposes a budget, elects officers, oversees park operations, secures philanthropy and volunteerism, and schedules improvements. The appointed members are: Cody Baker, Owosso Chair, At-Large Appointee Tony Newman, Corunna Vice-Chair/Shiawassee County Drain Commissioner Bonnie Reno, Corunna Secretary, At-Large Appointee Robert Downer, Bancroft At-Large Appointee
    [Show full text]
  • Ramsar Convention on Wetlands of International Importance
    The Convention on Wetlands of International Importance Ramsar Convention What Ramsar Is: Who can nominate a site stakeholders associated with the proposed site greatly contribute to • In 1971, an international convention • Any local government, group, the nomination process; and was held in Ramsar, Iran and community, private organization, participants signed a treaty entitled, or landowner can nominate a A completed Ramsar Information “The Convention on Wetlands of site for inclusion on the Ramsar Sheet, is available online at http://bit. International Importance, Especially List of Wetlands of International ly/1HIU7PR as Waterfowl Habitat.” Importance. The Federal government can also nominate sites, such as Nine Criteria for “Wetlands • The Ramsar Convention provides a National Parks, National Forests, or of International Importance” framework for voluntary international National Wildlife Refuges. Designation: cooperation for wetland conservation. A wetland should be considered • A written agreement is required internationally important if it meets • The U.S. acceded to the Ramsar from all landowners and a Member Convention April 18, 1987. any one of the following criteria. The of Congress representing the site: geographic area. What Ramsar Does: 1. contains a representative, rare, • Recognizes wetlands’ importance to Nomination package or unique example of a natural communities, cultures, governments, The petitioner must submit a complete or near-natural wetland type and businesses and encourages nomination package to the Director, found within the appropriate wetland conservation and wise use of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), biogeographic region; or wetlands. 1849 C Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20006, with a copy to the Global 2. supports vulnerable, endangered, • Establishes criteria for designating Program, Division of International or critically endangered species rivers, marshes, coral reefs and other Conservation, FWS.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribal Great Lakes Restoration Culturally Inspired Restoration Sabin Dam Removal - Grand Traverse Band
    2019 Tribal Great Lakes Restoration Culturally Inspired Restoration Sabin Dam Removal - Grand Traverse Band Invasive Species Control - Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band Aerial Moose Survey - 1854 Treaty Authority Cover Photo: Wild Rice restored on Nottawa Creek near the Nottawaseppi Huron Band of the Potawatomi Reservation Welcome Readers Dear Reader, The Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (GLRI) began in 2010 to accelerate efforts to protect and restore the Great Lakes. With the support of GLRI, tribes have substantially increased their capacity to participate in intergovernmental resource management activities for the Great Lakes alongside federal, state and other partners to address some of the most pressing challenges facing the Great Lakes. Indian country, comprised of reservation land bases and ceded territories where tribes retain rights, represents millions of acres within the Great Lakes Basin. Since 2010, the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), with support from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, has provided GLRI funding to more than 30 tribes and tribal organizations in the Midwest and Eastern Regions for Great Lakes protection and restoration projects. The BIA GLRI program has gradually increased, growing from $3 million in 2010 to over $11 million in 2019. In total, BIA has provided approximately $60 million in GLRI funding to tribes as of fall 2019 to implement over 500 tribally led restoration projects. These projects protected and restored 190,000 acres of habitat and approximately 550 miles of Great Lakes tributaries, and include over 40 distinct projects to protect and restore native species. The majority of tribal GLRI projects work to assess, monitor, protect and restore local waterways, habitats, and species such as lake sturgeon, moose, and wild rice essential for tribal life-ways and cultural continuity.
    [Show full text]
  • Coordinating Conservation in the St. Clair-Detroit River System Steven Francoeur Eastern Michigan University
    University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor State of the Strait Great Lakes Institute for Environmental Research 2016 State of the Strait: Coordinating Conservation in the St. Clair-Detroit River System Steven Francoeur Eastern Michigan University Jan Ciborowski University of Windsor John Gannon USGS Great Lakes Science Center Donna Kashian Wayne State University Katherine Kahl The Nature Conservancy Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/softs Recommended Citation Francoeur, Steven; Ciborowski, Jan; Gannon, John; Kashian, Donna; and Kahl, Katherine. (2016). State of the Strait: Coordinating Conservation in the St. Clair-Detroit River System. https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/softs/6 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Great Lakes Institute for Environmental Research at Scholarship at UWindsor. It has been accepted for inclusion in State of the Strait by an authorized administrator of Scholarship at UWindsor. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Coordinating Conservation in the St. Clair-Detroit River System 2016 Cover Photo Credits: Jerry Jourdan (Spiderweb at the Detroit River International Wildlife Refuge - Humbug Unit, August 2015), Mike Grosso (Seagull and ship passing by Belanger Park - River Rouge, Michigan, November 2015), US Fish and Wildlife Service (Sunrise and Humbug Marsh - Detroit River, June 2015), Michigan Sea Grant (Sturgeon, December 2001). State of the Strait: Coordinating Conservation in the St. Clair-Detroit River System 2016 Edited by: Steven Francoeur, Eastern Michigan University; Jan Ciborowski, University of Windsor; John Gannon, USGS Great Lakes Science Center (ret.); Donna Kashian, Wayne State University; and Katherine Kahl, The Nature Conservancy Based on the 2015 State of the Strait Conference held at Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, Michigan, USA Suggested citation: Francoeur, S., J.
    [Show full text]
  • GLAH Fall 05
    Fall Edition 2005 Volume 13 Issue 4 Don’t Miss this Opportunity to Have In This Issue: Your Voice Heard on Great Lakes Issues! Director’s Notes . 2 A Higher Quality of Life (Grassroots Profile) . 3 Grassroots Citizen Advocate Award Recipients . 4, 5 The Future of the Great Lakes Can’t Attend? Protecting Rare Habitat Water Quality Agreement Contribute online (Partnership Profile) . 6 First signed in 1972, the Great Lakes Water www.ijc.org/glconsultations Industrial Pollution Laws Quality Agreement between Canada and the Call toll-free (866) 813-0642 (Lake Ontario) . 7 United States expresses the commitment of Fax (613) 993-5583 Bulldozer Amendment each country to restore and maintain the Write International Joint Commission (Lake Erie - U.S.) . 8 chemical, physical and biological integrity of the Great Lakes basin ecosystem. Great Lakes Regional Office Fish Barrier Project 100 Ouellette Ave., 8th Floor or (Lake Erie – Ontario) . 9 The governments of the United States and P.O. Box 32869 Public Trust Doctrine Canada are required to review the operation Windsor, ON N9A 6T3 (Lake Huron - U.S.) . 10 and effectiveness of the Agreement every six Detroit, MI 48232 years and determine whether it needs to be Fen Habitat The governments will receive your (Lake Huron – Ontario) . 11 amended in any way. It is now time for the governments to launch that review. submission in full, in the format in which it Aquatic Invaders was submitted (audio-visual or written). (Lake Michigan) . 12 The governments have asked the A New Sense of Community International Joint Commission to consult Deadline for submissions: (Lake Superior) .
    [Show full text]