DOCSLIB.ORG

Chassahowitzka Chassahowitzka Plan Comprehensive Conservation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chassahowitzka Chassahowitzka Plan Comprehensive Conservation U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Chassahowitzka NationalWildlifeRefuge Chassahowitzka National Wildlife Refuge Refuge Manager: Michael Lusk, (Project Leader) 1502 S.E. Kings Bay Drive Crystal River, FL 34429 Phone: (352) 563-2088 / ext. 202 Fax: (352) 795-7961 E-mail: [email protected] U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 1 800/344 WILD http://www.fws.gov Chassahowitzka National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive ConservationPlan September 2012 Comprehensive Conservation Plan USFWS Photos Photo Credits: Operation Migration, by Keith Ramos Dog Island, by Amber Breland Chass Aerial, by Joyce Kleen Comprehensive Conservation Plans provide long-term guidance for manage- ment decisions; set forth goals, objectives, and strategies needed to accom- plish refuge purposes; and identify the Fish and Wildlife Service’s best esti- mate of future needs. These plans detail program planning levels that are sometimes substantially above current budget allocations and, as such, are primarily for Service strategic planning and program prioritization purposes. The plans do not constitute a commitment for staffing increases, operational and maintenance increases, or funding for future land acquisition. Chassahowitzka National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region September 2012 COMPREHENSIVE CONSERVATION PLAN CHASSAHOWITZKA NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Citrus and Hernando Counties, Florida U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia September 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS COMPREHENSIVE CONSERVATION PLAN Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 1 I. Background ...................................................................................................................................... 5 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 5 Purpose and Need for the Plan .................................................................................................... 5 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ...................................................................................................... 9 National Wildlife Refuge System .................................................................................................. 9 Legal and Policy Context ............................................................................................................ 10 Legal Mandates and Administrative and Policy Guidelines .............................................. 10 Biological Integrity, Diversity, and Environmental Health Policy ....................................... 11 National and International Conservation Plans and Initiatives ................................................... 11 Florida Manatee Recovery Plan ........................................................................................11 Western Hemisphere Migratory Species Initiative ............................................................12 North American Bird Conservation Initiative .....................................................................12 National Fish Habitat Action Plan ......................................................................................14 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Marine Debris Removal Program ............................................................................................................................ 14 Climate Science Centers ...................................................................................................15 Relationship to State Wildlife and Habitat Protection Agencies .................................................15 II. Refuge Overview ............................................................................................................................ 17 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 17 Refuge Description, History of Establishment, and Purposes .................................................... 17 Special Designations .................................................................................................................. 18 Outstanding Florida Waters Designation ..........................................................................18 Marine Protected Areas ....................................................................................................18 Important Bird Area ........................................................................................................... 18 Federal Wilderness Designation and Stewardship ...........................................................18 Ecosystem Context .....................................................................................................................21 Landscape Context .....................................................................................................................21 Strategic Habitat Conservation .........................................................................................22 National Network of Landscape Conservation Cooperatives ............................................ 22 Peninsular Florida Landscape Conservation Cooperative ................................................ 25 Regional Conservation Plans and Initiatives ..............................................................................26 Recovery Plans ................................................................................................................. 26 Southeastern Coastal Plain Colonial Waterbird Conservation Plan ..................................26 Southeastern Coastal Plain and Caribbean Region Shorebird Conservation Plan ...... 26 State and Local Conservation Plans and Initiatives ...................................................................27 Florida Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy ....................................................27 Florida Natural Areas Inventory ........................................................................................27 Florida Forever Program ...................................................................................................27 Critical Lands and Waters Identification Project and the Cooperative Conservation Blueprint ......................................................................................................28 St. Martins Marsh Aquatic Preserve Management Plan ...................................................28 Table of Contents i Crystal River Preserve State Park Unit Management Plan ............................................... 29 Chassahowitzka Wildlife Management Area Plan ............................................................ 29 Chassahowitzka River and Coastal Swamps ................................................................... 29 Withlacoochee State Forest .............................................................................................. 30 Great Florida Birding and Wildlife Trail ............................................................................. 30 Ecological Threats and Problems ............................................................................................... 30 Potential Impacts Associated with Climate Change .......................................................... 30 Exotic, Invasive, and Nuisance Species ........................................................................... 32 Physical Resources .................................................................................................................... 32 Climate .............................................................................................................................. 32 Geology and Topography ................................................................................................. 32 Soils .................................................................................................................................. 33 Hydrology .......................................................................................................................... 36 Air Quality ......................................................................................................................... 36 Water Quality and Quantity ............................................................................................... 41 Biological Resources .................................................................................................................. 43 Habitat .............................................................................................................................. 43 Wildlife .............................................................................................................................. 47 Cultural Resources ..................................................................................................................... 57 Historical Period ................................................................................................................ 59 Socioeconomic Environment ...................................................................................................... 60 Demographic Data ............................................................................................................ 60 Economy, Recreation, and Tourism ..........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Relationships Among Native and Alien Plants on Pacific Islands with and Without Significant Human Disturbance and Feral Ungulates
    RELATIONSHIPS AMONG NATIVE AND ALIEN PLANTS ON PACIFIC ISLANDS WITH AND WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT HUMAN DISTURBANCE AND FERAL UNGULATES Mark D. Merlin and James 0. Juvik ABSTRACT The native plants of remote tropical islands have been frequently characterized as poor competitors against seemingly more aggressive alien species.. Does this "weak competitor" characterization relate to some real adaptive consequences of island isolation and endemism, or does the generally concurrent presence of introduced ungulates and other forms of recurrent human disturbance also act to encourage alien plant dominance? A comparison of tropical islands with and without introduced ungulates suggests that some insular plant species competitively resist alien displacement in the absence of ungulates. INTRODUCTION For millions of years remote tropical islands in the Pacific Ocean have provided a variety of ecological opportunities for plant species that reached them through long-distance dispersal mechanisms. Many species that successfully established themselves on far-flung oceanic islands gave rise to extraordinary endemic forms, examples of adaptive radiation, and unusual adaptive shifts. Evolutionary developments occurred on isolated islands largely because of the limited numbers and kinds of colonizing taxa and varying environmental diversity within islands or groups of islands. Among the structural and physiological adaptations that frequently occur in remote island environments is the disappearance of typical defensive mechanisms such as poisons, strong odors, thorns, deep tap roots, and tough stems and branches in insular plant species. Some of these adaptations left many species especially vulnerable to a variety of alien ungulates introduced in the historic period (Fosberg 1965; Mangenot 1965; Mueller-Dombois 1975). In the Hawaiian Islands, for example, only a very small fraction of the endemic species of plants produce poisons, thorns, or other defensive strategies against herbivory (Carlquist 1974, 1980).
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016
    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Revised February 24, 2017 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Sesuvium Portulacastrum (L.) L
    Sesuvium portulacastrum (L.) L. Sea Purslane (Portulaca portulacastrum) Other Common Names: Cenicilla, Shoreline Sea Purslane, Shoreline Purslane. Family: Aizoaceae, subfamily Sesuvioideae. Cold Hardiness: Not well documented, but plants are winter hardy in USDA zones 9(8b) to 13, with shoots damaged by temperatures below the upper to mid-20°F, while established root systems may survive in mulched or sheltered locations in warmer parts of USDA zone 8b. Foliage: Evergreen, alternate, simple succulent leaves are up to about 2 long and more or less cylindrical or flattened oblong to narrowly oblanceolate, tapering to point; bases tend to clasp the stems; foliage is generally reminiscent of a robust coarse textured moss rose (Portulaca grandiflora); in cool weather or when plants are under stress, the foliage takes on a reddish cast, but is otherwise a strong dark green color. Flower: Small ¾diameter solitary star-shaped flowers are borne on ¼ long peduncles in the axils of the leaves; showy portions of the flowers are the white, pinkish purple to pale purple, or bicolor interior of the sepals; numerous stamens surround a single pistil; flowers occur whenever temperature conditions permit, but are small and scattered in the canopy minimizing their aesthetic contributions. Fruit: Aesthetically inconsequential small ¼ long conical capsules develop with tiny smooth shiny black seeds that are shaken out by the wind after the lid-like top of the capsule matures and is lost. Stem / Bark: Stems — stems are snaky, long, rope-like, and mostly prostrate or pendent, although some genotypes are erect for brief periods of time prior to being weighted down to the ground as they grow; stems are thickened and succulent, nearly round in cross-section and light green, green, or reddish on new stems, these typically mature to a dark green as stems age; Buds — the tiny, foliose buds do not develop bud scales; buds are usually a similar color as the stems; Bark — not applicable.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Mississippi Bird EA
    ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Managing Damage and Threats of Damage Caused by Birds in the State of Mississippi Prepared by United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Wildlife Services In Cooperation with: The Tennessee Valley Authority January 2020 i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Wildlife is an important public resource that can provide economic, recreational, emotional, and esthetic benefits to many people. However, wildlife can cause damage to agricultural resources, natural resources, property, and threaten human safety. When people experience damage caused by wildlife or when wildlife threatens to cause damage, people may seek assistance from other entities. The United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services (WS) program is the lead federal agency responsible for managing conflicts between people and wildlife. Therefore, people experiencing damage or threats of damage associated with wildlife could seek assistance from WS. In Mississippi, WS has and continues to receive requests for assistance to reduce and prevent damage associated with several bird species. The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires federal agencies to incorporate environmental planning into federal agency actions and decision-making processes. Therefore, if WS provided assistance by conducting activities to manage damage caused by bird species, those activities would be a federal action requiring compliance with the NEPA. The NEPA requires federal agencies to have available
    [Show full text]
  • Dietary Purslane (Portulaca Oleracea L.) Promotes the Growth Performance of Broilers by Modulation of Gut Microbiota
    Wang et al. AMB Expr (2021) 11:31 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-021-01190-z ORIGINAL ARTICLE Open Access Dietary purslane (Portulaca oleracea L.) promotes the growth performance of broilers by modulation of gut microbiota Cong Wang1, Qing Liu1,2, Fengchun Ye3, Hongbo Tang1, Yanpeng Xiong1, Yongfei Wu1, Luping Wang1, Xuanbiao Feng1, Shuiyin Zhang1,2, Yongmei Wan1 and Jianhua Huang1,2* Abstract Purslane is a widespread wild vegetable with both medicinal and edible properties. It is highly appreciated for its high nutritional value and is also considered as a high-quality feed resource for livestock and poultry. In this study, Sanhuang broilers were used to investigate the efect of feeding purslane diets on the growth performance in broil- ers and their gut microbiota. A total of 48 birds with good growth and uniform weight were selected and randomly allocated to four treatment groups A (control), B, C and D. Dietary treatments were fed with basal diet without purslane and diets containing 1%, 2% and 3% purslane. The 16S rDNA was amplifed by PCR and sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq platform to analyze the composition and diversity of gut microbiota in the four sets of samples. The results showed that dietary inclusion of 2% and 3% purslane could signifcantly improve the growth performance and reduce the feed conversion ratio. Microbial diversity analysis indicated that the composition of gut microbiota of San- huang broilers mainly included Gallibacterium, Bacteroides and Escherichia-Shigella, etc. As the content of purslane was increased, the abundance of Lactobacillus increased signifcantly, and Escherichia-Shigella decreased. LEfSe analysis revealed that Bacteroides_caecigallinarum, Lachnospiraceae, Lactobacillales and Firmicutes had signifcant diferences compared with the control group.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2012
    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2012 Edited by Laura E. Gadd, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Office of Conservation, Planning, and Community Affairs N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources 1601 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2012 Edited by Laura E. Gadd, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Office of Conservation, Planning, and Community Affairs N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources 1601 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 www.ncnhp.org NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM LIST OF THE RARE PLANTS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2012 Edition Edited by Laura E. Gadd, Botanist and John Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Office of Conservation, Planning, and Community Affairs Department of Environment and Natural Resources, 1601 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 www.ncnhp.org Table of Contents LIST FORMAT ......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 NORTH CAROLINA RARE PLANT LIST ......................................................................................................................... 10 NORTH CAROLINA PLANT WATCH LIST ..................................................................................................................... 71 Watch Category
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Flora and Vegetation Classification of the South Atlantic Coastal Plain Limestone Forest Association of Central Georgia
    VASCULAR FLORA AND VEGETATION CLASSIFICATION OF THE SOUTH ATLANTIC COASTAL PLAIN LIMESTONE FOREST ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL GEORGIA by PATRICK SUMNER LYNCH (Under the Direction of J.L. Hamrick) ABSTRACT The South Atlantic Coastal Plain Limestone forest is a globally imperiled (G2) forest association known only from the upper Coastal Plain of central Georgia. These calcareous forest communities support diverse floristic assemblages unique among the Georgia Coastal Plain, but have not been subject to detailed floristic study. I conducted a comprehensive floristic inventory, multivariate community analyses and floristic quality assessments to document composition, elucidate community structure and underlying physiographic regimes, and assess habitat integrity for seven sites in Houston, Bleckley and Twiggs counties. Community analyses revealed twelve community types within two floristically defined domains corresponding to uplands and slopes, and bottomlands, respectively, and governed largely by moisture content and degree of inclination. Floristic quality assessments revealed varying degrees of floristic quality and habitat integrity corresponding primarily to local physiography and disturbance history. Floristic inventory recovered 339 vascular plant taxa representing 218 genera in 98 families, including 17 rare Georgia species. INDEX WORDS: Limestone forest, community analysis, floristic inventory, floristic quality assessment, Georgia, Coastal Plain. VASCULAR FLORA AND VEGETATION CLASSIFICATION OF THE SOUTH ATLANTIC COASTAL PLAIN LIMESTONE FOREST ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL GEORGIA by PATRICK SUMNER LYNCH B.S., The University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, 2006 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF SCIENCE ATHENS, GEORGIA 2010 © 2012 Patrick Sumner Lynch All Rights Reserved VASCULAR FLORA AND VEGETATION CLASSIFICATION OF THE SOUTH ATLANTIC COASTAL PLAIN LIMESTONE FOREST ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL GEORGIA by PATRICK SUMNER LYNCH Major Professor: J.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Vernacular Name AMPHIUMA, ONE-TOED (Aka: Congo Eel, Congo Snake, Ditch Eel, Fish Eel and Lamprey Eel)
    1/6 Vernacular Name AMPHIUMA, ONE-TOED (aka: Congo Eel, Congo Snake, Ditch Eel, Fish Eel and Lamprey Eel) GEOGRAPHIC RANGE Eastern Gulf coast. HABITAT Wetlands: slow moving or stagnant freshwater rivers/streams/creeks and bogs, marshes, swamps, fens and peat lands. CONSERVATION STATUS IUCN: Near Threatened (2016). Population Trend: Decreasing. Because of the limited extent of its occurrence and because of the declining extent and quality of its habitat, this species is close to qualifying for Vulnerable. COOL FACTS Amphiumas are commonly known as "Congo eels," a misnomer. First of all, amphiumas are amphibians, rather than fish (which eels are). This notwithstanding, amphiumas bear resemblance to the elongate fishes. It is easy to overlook the diminutive legs, and the lack of any external gills adds to the similarity between the amphiumas and eels. Amphiumas are adapted for digging and tunneling. They seem to spend most of the time in muddy burrows and are rarely observed in the wild. They never fully metamorphose and retain larval characteristics in varying degrees into adulthood: one pair of the larval gill slits is retained and never disappears, no eyelids, no tongue and the presence of 4 gill arches with a single respiratory opening between the 3 rd--4th arches. Amphiumas have two pairs of limbs, and the three species, all of which occur in the S.E. U.S, differ in regard to the number of toes at the ends of these limbs: one, two or three. These amphiumas possess tiny, single-toed limbs, one pair just behind the small gill opening at each side of the neck and another pair just ahead of the longitudinal anal slit .
    [Show full text]
  • Review on Sea Purslane JPP 2015; 3(4): 22-24 Received: 20-11-2014 Accepted: 02-12-2014 Manbir Kaur, Nitika
    Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2015; 3(5): 22-24 E-ISSN: 2278-4136 P-ISSN: 2349-8234 Review on Sea purslane JPP 2015; 3(4): 22-24 Received: 20-11-2014 Accepted: 02-12-2014 Manbir Kaur, Nitika Abstract Manbir Kaur Sea purslane is a creeping, ornamental plant of family Aizoaceae. It is a perennial herb that grows Khalsa College of Pharmacy, throughout the world. Preliminary phytochemical screening of leaf showed the presence of alkaloid, Amritsar, Punjab, India. coumarin, flavonoid, phenol, steroid, tannins, terpenoid, and sugar in the different extracts. The plant Nitika possess broad spectrum activity against gram positive and gram negative bacteria as well as significant Khalsa College of Pharmacy, antifungal and antioxidant activity. It possess a number of bioactive constituents like Phytol, Squalene, Amritsar, Punjab, India. Vitamin E, Benzoic acid, Hexadecanoic acid, ethyl ester, Oleic acid, eicosyl ester. Keywords: Sea purslane, Sesuvium portulacastrum, Aizoaceae 1. Introduction There are twelve different species in the genus Sesuvium which are distributed in different parts of globe. A short taproot, numerous seeds, 2–5 stigmas, stem with adventitious roots at the nodes and uniflorous inflorescences are considered/believed the main features of the genus. Sesuvium portulacastrum L. (seapurslane) belonging to family Aizoaceae is one of the fast growing, herbaceous, perennial, dichotomous plant of this genus. Sesuvium portulacastrum (godabari), was first published in 1953 as Portulaca portulacastrum by Carl Linnaeus. After six years Linnaeus displaced Portulaca into Sesuvium and it has remained same name ever since. Sesuvium portulacastrum also known as shoreline purslane or sea purslane is a sprawling perennial herb that can exist under stress conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Portulacaceae – Purslane Family
    PORTULACACEAE – PURSLANE FAMILY Plant: herbs, rarely shrubs Stem: usually fleshy or succulent Root: Leaves: simple, entire, opposite or alternate, or in basal rosettes; stipules mostly absent, may be represented by fleshy structures or modified into hairs Flowers: perfect; 2 sepals usually, rarely up to 9; 2-4-6 or > petals, united or separate at base; stamens usually opposite each petal, or more numerous in a bundle; ovary mostly superior or partially inferior, few to many ovules Fruit: capsule Other: mostly in southern hemisphere; Dicotyledons Group Genera: 30+ genera; locally Claytonia (spring-beauty), Montia, Portulaca, Talinum WARNING – family descriptions are only a layman’s guide and should not be used as definitive Flower Morphology in the 2 or more sepals, 4-6 (rarely more, often Portulacaceae (Purslane Family) 5) free petals, leaves simple and entire, no stipules; stem often succulent Examples of common genera Shoreline Seapurslane [Virginia] Spring-Beauty Sesuvium portulacastrum (L.) L. Claytonia virginica L. var. virginica Purslane [Little Hog Weed] Portulaca oleracea L. (Introduced) Largeflower Fameflower [Rock Pink] Phemeranthus calycinus (Engelm.) Kiger Kiss Me Quick Portulaca pilosa L. PORTULACACEAE – PURSLANE FAMILY Ozark [Wide-Leafed] Spring-Beauty; Claytonia ozarkensis Miller & Chambers [Virginia] Spring-Beauty; Claytonia virginica L. var. virginica Largeflower Fameflower [Rock Pink]; Phemeranthus calycinus (Engelm.) Kiger Purslane [Little Hog Weed] Portulaca oleracea L. (Introduced) Kiss Me Quick; Portulaca pilosa
    [Show full text]
  • TRAPPING SUCCESS and POPULATION ANALYSIS of Siren Lacertina and Amphiuma Means
    TRAPPING SUCCESS AND POPULATION ANALYSIS OF Siren lacertina AND Amphiuma means By KRISTINA SORENSEN A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2003 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank my committee members Lora Smith, Franklin Percival, and Dick Franz for all their support and advice. The Department of Interior's Student Career Experience Program and the U.S. Geological Survey's Amphibian Research and Monitoring Initiative provided funding for this project. I thank those involved with these programs who have helped me over the last three years: David Trauger, Ken Dodd, Jamie Barichivich, Jennifer Staiger, Kevin Smith, and Steve Johnson. Numerous people helped with field work: Audrey Owens, Maya Zacharow, Chris Gregory, Matt Chopp, Amanda Rice, Paul Loud, Travis Tuten, Steve Johnson, and Jennifer Staiger, Lora Smith, and the UF Wildlife Field Techniques Courses of2001-2002. Paul Moler and John Jensen provided advice and shared their wealth of herpetological knowledge. I thank the staff of Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge and Steve Coates, manager of the Ordway Preserve, for their assistance on numerous occasions and for permission to conduct research on their property. Marinela Capanu of the IFAS Statistical Consulting Unit assisted with statistical analysis. Julien Martin, Bob Dorazio, Rob Bennets, and Cathy Langtimm provided advice on population analysis. I also thank the administrative staff of the Florida Caribbean Science Center and the Florida Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit. I am much indebted to all of these people, without whom this thesis would not have been possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Tall Timbers Bibliography
    Tall Timbers Bibliography Article Citations by Tall Timbers Authors Include the Following Areas of Interest Fire Research Quail Research Conservation Wildlife Management Outreach Geospatial Techniques & Tools Forest Management This Bibliography includes almost 1,400 articles published by Tall Timbers Staff and Associates, since 1958. It is a searchable PDF file. In Adobe Acrobat, it can be searched by author, date or subject matter. From the Edit menu, chose Find (Ctrl+F ) or Advanced Search (Shift+Ctrl+F). Bibliography 1. Engstrom, R.T. and G. Mikusinski. 1998. Ecological neighborhoods in red-cockaded woodpecker populations. The Auk. Vol. 115(2):473-478. 2. Abele, L.G. and D.B. Means. 1977. Sesarma jarvisi and Sesarma cookei: montane, terrestrial grapsid crabs in Jamaica (Decapoda). Crustaceana. Vol. 32(1):91-93. 3. Larson, B.C., W.K. Moser, and V.K. Mishra. 1998. Some relationships between silvicultural treatments and symmetry of stem growth in a red pine stand. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry. Vol. 15(2):90-93. 4. Altieri, M.A. 1981. Effect of time of disturbance on the dynamics of weed communities in north Florida. Geobios. Vol. 8(4):145-151. 5. Altieri, M.A. and J.D. Doll. 1978. The potential of allelopathy as a tool for weed management in crop fields. Pans. Vol. 24(4):495-502. 6. Loughry, W.J. and C.M. McDonough. 1998. Spatial patterns in a population of nine-banded armadillos (Dasy pus novemcinctus). The American Midland Naturalist. Vol. 140(1):161-169. 7. McNair, D.B. and J.A. Gore. 1998. Occurrences of flamingos in northwest Florida, including a recent record of the greater flamingo (Phoenicopterus ruber).
    [Show full text]