Présence Et Ambitions Des Affranchis Dans L'empire Romain
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Unclaimed Property for County: CATAWBA 7/16/2019
Unclaimed Property for County: CATAWBA 7/16/2019 OWNER NAME ADDRESS CITY ZIP PROP ID ORIGINAL HOLDER ADDRESS CITY ST ZIP 321 CONVENIENCE STORE 820 US HWY 321 NW HICKORY 28601 14823582 LIGGETT VECTOR BRANDS INC 3800 PARAMOUNT PKWY STE 250 MORRISVILLE NC 27560 34 DORIS S 53 15TH AV SW HICKORY 28602-4521 15251669 CELLCO PARTNERSHIP DBA VERIZON WIRELESS899 HEATHROW PARK LANE 3RD FLOOR LAKE MARY FL 32746 A PLUS SERVICE INC 2233 HIGHLAND AVE NE UNIT #A HICKORY 28601 15192655 DUKE ENERGY CORP 400 S TRYON ST ST04A CHARLOTTE NC 28202 AAA STEAM CARPET CARE 2802 21ST STREET PL NE HICKORY 28601-7975 15111190 FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES OPERATING COMPANY109 NO LLCRTHPARK BOULEVARD SUITE 500 COVINGTON LA 70433 ABBAMONDI CHRISTOPHER 1343 CAPE HICKORY ROAD HICKORY 28601 14851305 GOOGLE LLC & AFFILIATES 1600 AMPHITHEATRE PKWY MOUNTAIN VIEW CA 94043 ABBE KYLE 452 SOUTH CENTER ST HICKORY 28602 15854844 GEORGE N BRYAN DDS PA 3421 GRAYSTONE PL CONOVER NC 28613 ABBOTT LABORATORIES 6330 DWAYNE STARNES DRIVE HICKORY 28602-8960 15393285 NC DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 1514 MAIL SERVICE CENTER RALEIGH NC 27699 ABEE ALLEN D 2496 SPRINGDALE DR NEWTON 28658-9786 15309707 AUTO OWNERS INS CO PO BOX 30660 6101 ANACAPRI BLVD LANSING MI 48909-8160 ABEE KYLE ANDREW 4114 BIGGERSTAFF RD MAIDEN 28650-9368 15265214 RUTHERFORD ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORPPO BOX 1569 FOREST CITY NC 28043-1569 ABEE NANCY 2496 SPRINGDALE DR NEWTON 28658-9786 15309707 AUTO OWNERS INS CO PO BOX 30660 6101 ANACAPRI BLVD LANSING MI 48909-8160 ABEE RUSSELL JR 1911 LAKE ACRES DR HICKORY 28601 15307994 NATIONAL VISION -
Ancient Narrative Supplementum 5
Gareth and Me: A Petronian Pilgrimage BARRY BALDWIN University of Calgary ‘Oft in danger, yet alive We are come to Thirtyfive…’ (Samuel Johnson, To Mrs Thrale, On Her Completing Her Thirty-Fifth Year, 1777) It was 35 years ago (almost twice the distance between Sergeant Pepper and the Beatles) that I scraped into the first volume of the Petronian Society Newsletter, albeit with false initial, courtesy of a review of Fellini-Satyricon, plus an adnotatiuncula on Trimalchio’s aper pilleatus (1,2, 1970, 24). To this event I trace back my amicitia with, and tirocinium under, Gareth Schmeling, the Petronian Arbiter of us all, soon to consolidate this title with his forthcoming (stupendous – I’ve just read the entire manuscript) Com- mentary and OCT of the Satyrica, the latter a welcome change from the in- creasingly unnecessary stream of revised Müllers. For the next issue (2,1, 1971, 4–5), our Magister gave me bigger game to stalk, requiring a review of Kenneth Rose’s The Date and Author of the Sa- tyricon (Leiden: Brill, 1971) and a critique of Averil Cameron’s ‘Myth and Meaning in Petronius,’ (Latomus 29, 1970, 397–425) with its considerable emphasis on Ira Priapi, subsuming her previous ‘Plato and Habinnas,’ (CQ 63, 1969, 367–370), in which the late arrival of Habinnas at the Cena is un- derstood as a conscious evocation of Alcibiades’ irruption upon Plato’s Symposium. Ab Iove principium… Or, rather, Juno. Over the years I have amiably disagreed with Averil over the early Byzantine poets Agathias and Corippus. Not quite another story. -
Judaean Rulers and Notable Personnages
Chronology of Syria and Palestine, 40 BCE – 70 CE Governors of Governors of Governors of Iturea, Trachonitis, Judaea Galilee/Perea Paneas & Batanaea Judaean High Lysanias (Tetrarch) LEGEND Priests (including Chalcis and Abila) Ananelus 37-36 BCE 40–36 BCE Aristobulus III 36 BCE High priests of Jerusalem Cleopatra VII Philopater Ananelus 36-30 BCE (Pharaoh of Egypt) 36–30 Rulers of Nabatea Roman prefects Roman 30 BCE Emperors Governors of The status of this territory Herodian monarchs between Cleopatras’ death and Jesus ben Fabus 30–23 BCE Roman Syria Zenodorus’ administration is Marcus Terentius Varro 25–23 uncertain. Roman legates Herod the Great (King) (part of the kingdom of Zenodorus (Tetrarch) 40/39–4 BCE Judaea) 23–20 BCE Roman proconsuls 20 BCE Obodas III Marcus Vipsanius Agrippa 39–9 BCE 23–13 Other rulers Zenodorus’ territories were incorporated into Herod’s Simon ben Boethus 23–5 BCE kingdom in 20 BCE. Trachonitis, Auranitis and Batanaea were Marcus Titius given to Herod earlier, in 23 BCE. 13–9 Governors of 10 BCE Jamnia, Ashdod & Gaius Sentius Saturninus 9–7/6 Phasaelis Augustus Publius Quinctilius Varus 27 BCE – 14 CE 7/6–4 Formerly part of Herod’s kingdom Lucius Calpurnius Piso Caesoninus** 4–1 BCE Matthias ben Theophilus 5–4 BCE Joazar ben Boethus 4 BCE Herod Archelaus (Ethnarch) 1 CE Eleazar ben Boethus 4–3 BCE Gaius Julius Caesar Vipsanianus Jesus ben Sie 3 BC– ? 4 BCE – 6 CE 1 BCE – 4 CE Joazar ben Boethus ?–6 CE Salome I (Toparch) 4 BCE – 10 CE Lucius Volusius Saturninus 4–5 Coponius 6–9 Publius Sulpicius Quirinius -
The Buried Cities of Campa Ia Their History
THE BURIED CITIES OF CAMPAIA THEIR HISTORY, THEIR DESTRUCTIO, AD THEIR REMAIS. By W. H. DAVEPORT ADAMS, " And in an hour of universal mirth, What time the trump proclaims the festival. Buries some capital city, there to sleep The sleep of ages — till a plough, a spade Disclose the secret, and the eye of day Glares coldly on the streets, the skeletons ; Each in his place, each in his gay attire. And eager to enjoy." ROGERS. 1870. SHAKSPEARE makes Malcolm say of the Thane of Cawdor, that " nothing in his life became him like the leaving it." Of Pompeii it may be said, that nothing in its history is equal in interest to its last scene. The fate of the gay Campanian city has been curious. Some cities have secured enduring fame by their commercial opulence, like Tyre ; by their art-wonders, like Athens ; by their world-wide power, like Rome ; or their gigantic ruins, like Thebes. Of others, scarcely less famous for their wealth and empire, the site is almost forgotten ; their very names have almost passed away from the memory of men. But this third-rate provincial town — the " Brighton" or " Scarborough" of the Roman patricians, though less splendid and far less populous than the English watering-places— owes its celebrity to its very destruction. Had it not been overwhelmed by the ashes- of Vesuvius, the student, the virtuoso, and the antiquary, would never have been drawn to it as to a VI PREFACE. shrine worthy of a pilgrim's homage. As a graceful writer has justly remarked, the terrible mountain, whilst it destroyed, has also saved Pompeii ; and in so doing, has saved tor us an ever- vivid illustration of anpient Roman life. -
Download Searchable
1EI |rijU|lml|finJpij^llm^ il i i THE LIBRARIES 1 1 COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 1 1 1 1 i i 1cJ Pgpyrus & Epigraphy III I1 1 li 1 li i SI [iriJ|finll^|p]i?ff^ LATIN TERMS OF ENDEARMENT AND DF FAMILY RELATIONSHIP A LEXICOGRAPHICAL STUDY BASED ON VOLUME VI OF THE CORPUS INSCRIPTiONUM LATINARUM A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE FACULTY OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (DEPARTMENT OF CLASSICS) :--'^~ -<L—^'«--^ ^ BY SAMUEL GLENN HARROD PRINCETON 1909 Copies of this dissertation may be obtained on application to the University Library, Princeton, New Jersey. The price for each copy is 75 cents, which includes postage. PRINCETON, N, J. THE FALCON PRESS 1909 PARENTIBUS PIENTISSIMIS MATERTERAEQUE CARISSIMAE PREFACE I take this occasion to acknowledge my great debt to Professor F. F. Abbott of Princeton University. At his suggestion, I under took this investigation, and, during the course of my work upon it, his advice and criticism have been invaluable. I desire to express my deep gratitude also to Professor Edward Capps and Professor D. R. Stuart, both of Princeton University, for their helpfulness and interest in my work. S. G. H. EUREKA COLLEGE, Eureka, Illinois. vn CONTENTS PAGE. PREFACE vii INTRODUCTION xi CHAPTER I.—TERMS OF ENDEARMENT i Merens and Meritus i Carissimus 2 Dulcissimus 6 Pientissimus 10 Piissimus 13 Optimus 17 Sanctissimns 20 Incomparabilis 23 Pius 25 Rarissimus 27 Fidelissimus 28 Dignissimus 29 Amantissimiis 31 Indulgentissimus 32 Carus 34 Bonus 35 Dulcis Z^ Castissimus 37 Sanctus 38 Innocentissimus 39 Castus 40 Praestantissimus 41 Adjectives of Rarer Occurrence 42 Statistical Table ' 49 Discussion of the Terms of Endearment Applied by the Author of the Inscription to Himself 50 Discussion of Abbreviations 51 ix X CONTENTS PAGE. -
Map 53 Bosphorus Compiled by C
Map 53 Bosphorus Compiled by C. Foss, 1995 Introduction (See Map 52) Directory All place names are in Turkey Abbreviation DionByz R. Güngerich (ed.), Dionysii Byzantii Anaplus Bospori, 1927 (reprint, Berlin, 1958) Names Grid Name Period Modern Name / Location Reference Aianteion See Lettered Place Names B2 Aietou Rhynkos Pr. R Yalıköy RE Bosporos 1, col. 753 B2 Akoimeton Mon. L at Eirenaion Janin 1964, 486-87 C3 Akritas Pr. RL Tuzla burnu FOA VIII, 2 A3 Ammoi L E Bakırköy Janin 1964, 443 B2 Amykos HR Beykoz RE Bosporos 1, col. 753 B2 Anaplous?/ L/ Arnavutköy Janin 1964, 468, 477-78 Promotou? L B2 Ancyreum Pr. R Yum burnu RE Bosporos 1, col. 752 B3 [Antigoneia] Ins. Burgaz ada RE Panormos 7 B2 Aphrodysium R Çalı Burnu RE Bosporos 1, col. 751 B2 Archeion R Ortaköy RE Bosporos 1, col. 747 B2 Argyronion RL Macar tabya RE Bosporos 1, col. 752-53 Argyropolis/ See Lettered Place Names Bytharion? Auleon? Sinus See Lettered Water Names Auletes See Lettered Place Names B2 ‘Bacca’ Collis R N Kuruçesme RE Bosporos 1, col. 747 B2 Bacchiae/ C/ Koybaşı RE Bosporos 1, col. 748 Thermemeria HR A2 Barbyses fl. RL Kâgithane deresi RE Bathykolpos See Lettered Water Names B2 *Bathys fl. R Büyükdere DionByz 71; GGM II, 54 B2 Bithynia See Map 52 A2 Blachernai RL Ayvansaray RE; Janin 1964, 57-58 Bolos See Lettered Place Names B2 Boradion L above Kanlıca Janin 1964, 484 B2 Bosphorus RL Bogaziçi RE Bosporos 1; NPauly Bosporos 1 §Bosporos CHRL Bosporion = Phosphorion A2 Bosporios Pr. R Saray burnu RE Βοσπόριος ἄκρα A2 Boukolos Collis R DionByz 25; C. -
Epigraphic Evidence for Boundary Disputes in the Roman Empire
EPIGRAPHIC EVIDENCE FOR BOUNDARY DISPUTES IN THE ROMAN EMPIRE by Thomas Elliott A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History. Chapel Hill 2004 Approved by _____________________________________ Advisor: Professor Richard Talbert _____________________________________ Reader: Professor Jerzy Linderski _____________________________________ Reader: Professor Mary Boatwright _____________________________________ Reader: Professor George Houston _____________________________________ Reader: Professor Melissa Bullard ii This page intentionally left blank. iii © 2004 Thomas Elliott ALL RIGHTS RESERVED iv This page intentionally left blank. v ABSTRACT THOMAS ELLIOTT: Epigraphic Evidence for Boundary Disputes in the Roman Empire (Under the direction of Richard Talbert) This dissertation presents all published Greek and Latin epigraphic documents relating to internal boundary disputes of the Roman empire. In date, it spans the period from 2 BC to the third century AD. Spatially, the documents derive from 12 provinces ( Achaia, Africa, Asia, Baetica, Cilicia, Creta et Cyrene, Dalmatia, Iudaea, Lusitania, Macedonia, Moesia and Syria ), plus Italy. The presentation of each includes a text, English translation, bibliography and commentary. Analytical chapters expand upon recent published work by G. Burton and B. Campbell. Terminological analysis permits classification of epigraphic and literary evidence into five categories: boundary disputes, restoration of public and sacred lands, other land disputes, the assignment of boundaries and other authoritative demarcations involving Roman officials. The analysis also provides a more focused definition of several Latin and Greek words that indicate the delivery of a verdict by a Roman official ( decretum, sententia, iudicium, ἀποφάσις, κρίσις, ἐπικρίμα ). -
From Huns Into Persians: the Projected Identity of the Turks in the Byzantine Rhetoric of Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries
From Huns into Persians: The Projected Identity of the Turks in the Byzantine Rhetoric of Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries By Roman Shliakhtin Supervisor: Daniel Ziemann, Niels Gaul Submitted to the Medieval Studies Department Central European University, Budapest In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Medieval Studies CEU eTD Collection Budapest 2016 1 Acknowledgements I would like to thank my supervisor professor Niels Gaul who fostered my talents and supported me. His care and trust helped me to overcome many obstacles I met on the way and stimulated me to challenge my own limits and systematize my results. I express gratitude to my supervisor Daniel Ziemann and to the pre-defense committee members Volker Menze and Tijana Krstic. I also thank my first teacher Rustam Shukurov who encouraged me to start the project in 2007 and keeps supporting me with his friendship and advice up to the present day. I thank my colleagues and friends Mariana Bodnaruk, Marijana Vukovic, Andras Kraft and Divna Manolova who read parts of this dissertation at the later stage. I express my gratitude to my mentor and the former head of the Dumbarton Oaks Byzantine Studies Program, professor Michael Maas who commented on the methodology of the project. I also thank Head of the PhD Program Alice Choyke and PhD Coordinator Csilla Dobos for their patience and help. I express my appreciation to the following specialists for sharing their expertise and providing feedback on my project: Mary Cunningham, Leslie Brubaker, Michael Jeffreys, Elizabeth Jeffreys, Michael Angold, Mark Whittow, Ingella Nilsson, Ruth Macrides and Paul Magdalino. -
Romans in Rome: a Reception of Romans in the Roman Context of Ethnicity and Faith
Durham E-Theses Reading Romans in Rome: A Reception of Romans in the Roman Context of Ethnicity and Faith HOLDSWORTH, BENJAMIN,EVANS How to cite: HOLDSWORTH, BENJAMIN,EVANS (2009) Reading Romans in Rome: A Reception of Romans in the Roman Context of Ethnicity and Faith, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/214/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 Reading Romans in Rome: A Reception of Romans in the Roman Context of Ethnicity and Faith Thesis Submission for a Doctor of Philosophy To the University of Durham Durham, United Kingdom By Benjamin Evans Holdsworth, Jr. July 2009 Declaration I hereby declare that the work included in this thesis is original. No part of this thesis has been submitted for a degree elsewhere in the United Kingdom, or in any other country or university. -
The Mother of Gods from Right Here: the Goddess Meter in Her Central Anatolian Contexts
THE MOTHER OF GODS FROM RIGHT HERE: THE GODDESS METER IN HER CENTRAL ANATOLIAN CONTEXTS A Master’s Thesis by JOSEPH SALVATORE AVERSANO Department of Archaeology İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University Ankara August 2019 For Asu THE MOTHER OF GODS FROM RIGHT HERE: THE GODDESS METER IN HER CENTRAL ANATOLIAN CONTEXTS The Graduate School of Economics and Social Sciences of İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University by JOSEPH SALVATORE AVERSANO In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS IN ARCHAEOLOGY THE DEPARTMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY İHSAN DOĞRAMACI BİLKENT UNİVERSİTY ANKARA August 201 vi ABSTRACT THE MOTHER OF GODS FROM RIGHT HERE: THE GODDESS METER IN HER CENTRAL ANATOLIAN CONTEXTS Aversano, Joseph Salvatore M.A., Department of Archaeology Supervisor: Assist. Prof. Charles Gates August 2019 There are upwards of sixty different cult epithets for the Phrygian goddess Meter in Central Anatolia alone during the Roman Imperial period. Considering that only three or four of her epithets are known from the Hellenistic period, the contrast is striking. Moreover, many of the epithets tend to be epichoric, so that in essence, her names can change from one valley to the next. In some cases, merely hearing an epithet is enough to bring a certain part of central Anatolia to mind. From this, a natural question arises. Why was there a need for so many local Meter cults in Asia Minor? The goddess Meter, called Magna Mater by the Romans, had been adopted into the Roman Pantheon in 204 BC; but could she, although indigenous to Phrygia, no longer meet the religious needs of her homeland’s people? This thesis approaches these questions by two primary means. -
ROMAN PHRYGIA: Cities and Their Coinage
ROMAN PHRYGIA: Cities and their Coinage Andrea June Armstrong, PhD, University College London. Abstract of Thesis Roman Phrygia: Cities and their Coinage The principal focus of this thesis is the Upper Maeander Valley in Phrygia, which is now part of modern Turkey, and in particular three cities situated in that region, namely Laodicea, Hierapolis and Colossae. The main source used is the coinage produced by these cities with the aim of determining how they viewed their place within the Roman Empire and how they reacted to the realities of Roman rule. Inscriptional, architectural and narrative sources are also used as well as comparative material from other Phrygian and Asian cities. In order to achieve its aim, the thesis is divided into two parts. Part One details the history of Laodicea, Hierapolis and Colossae and explains the coinage system in use within the province of Asia on a regional and a civic level. The final chapter in the first part of the thesis introduces the theme of the interaction between city, region and empire which is developed more fully in Part Two. Part Two discusses the types used on the coins of the cities of the Upper Maeander Valley in the context of the cultural and religious circumstances of Rome and also in reaction to the organisational and political changes affecting the province of Asia as well as the Empire as a whole. The main conclusions of the thesis are that the cities of Laodicea, Hierapolis and Colossae were very aware of Rome and of their own status, as well as that of their province, within the Roman Empire especially in the context of ongoing circumstances and developments within the Empire. -
©2011 Benjamin Wesley Hicks ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
2011 Benjamin Wesley Hicks ALL RIGHTS RESERVED THE PROCESS OF IMPERIAL DECISION-MAKING FROM AUGUSTUS TO TRAJAN by BENJAMIN WESLEY HICKS A Dissertation submitted to the Graduate School-New Brunswick Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in Classics written under the direction of T. Corey Brennan and approved by ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ New Brunswick, New Jersey May, 2011 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION The Process of Imperial Decision-Making from Augustus to Trajan by BENJAMIN WESLEY HICKS Dissertation Director: T. Corey Brennan Previous studies of Roman imperial decision-making have largely viewed the structure of imperial government either through the lens of the later Principate or of the consilium principis. This dissertation instead focuses on the early Principate, the era when the first emperors established patterns that shaped the growing imperial governmental and bureaucratic apparatus. It examines decision-making as a process, tracing the handling of problems of state and law from the provincial governor to the implementation of the emperor‘s decisions. The evidence of Pliny the Younger‘s letters from Bithynia-Pontus make him the subject of the first component of this study, which uses social network theory to examine the flow of information both within an imperial province and between emperor and governor, wherein the governor acted as a filter through which information flowed to the emperor. Turning to the actual deliberation on decisions, this same consideration of social networks reveals that the consilium principis, whose position between court and petitioner allowed it to function as the node between two ―cliques,‖ played a central role in mediating the tensions between ruler and subject while fulfilling a particularly Roman need to legitimate the acta of magistrates through consultative decision-making.