Connecting Plymouth and the South West

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Connecting Plymouth and the South West PLYMOUTH’S OFFERS AND ASKS CONNECTING PLYMOUTH AND THE SOUTH WEST 1. Rail Ask Short-term . Urgently reconsiders the DfT’s proposals set out in the Cross Country Rail Passenger Public Consultation suggesting that direct trains from Penzance to the Midlands and the north should end at Plymouth. Undertake the line speed improvements and move from 60mph to 75mph between Totnes and Hemerdon (Plymouth) as part of the track renewal already planned by Network Rail; . To secure Wi-Fi and improvements in mobile connectivity on trains between London and Penzance and actively promote the peninsula’s role in the national pilot for improved Wi-Fi; . Cowley Bridge and Dawlish resilience works 2h15m journey times between Plymouth and London; . Recognises the needs of the South West set out in the 20 Year Plan ‘Closing the Gap’ in the new franchise specifications for Cross Country and Great Western including: . an hourly semi-fast Paddington to Exeter and extended to Plymouth . rolling stock resilient to sea spray at Dawlish . Commit to funding development of outline business case of diversionary route and additional capacity between Exeter and Yeovil junction. Long-term That the Government: . Funds and supports the Peninsula Rail Task Force (PRTF) to oversee the delivery of a fit for purpose rail network for its passengers across the South West Peninsula: A resilient network which is not susceptible to regular disruption due to adverse weather; Faster journey times to London, the South East, the Midlands and the North; and Greater train capacity and facilities to enable travel time to be used productively. Context The South West has lost out because of poor transport investment for over 20 years, averaging £35 per head compared to a national average of £98 per head – leaving our region some £2bn behind other areas. Our regional rolling stock is the oldest, dating back to the late 1970s. The Met Office says climate change incidents will become more frequent, and with Network Rail warning that the line at Dawlish will suffer closure every four years by 2065, the South West remains more vulnerable than many parts of the UK. The events in Dawlish and on the Somerset levels in 2014 highlighted that our rail network is highly vulnerable to impacts of extreme weather events and that urgent action is required to address resilience and improve the connectivity to London and other major cities to unlock business potential and protect the economic output of the region. It has been estimated that these events cost the South West Peninsula’s economy over £1.2bn. During 2016/17 there has been further disruption at Cowley Bridge due to flooding, and the loss of cross-country services at Dawlish whenever high tides and strong winds are forecast, which is becoming an all too frequent event. We welcome and support the improvements and benefits that will be delivered through 2018 and 2019. The imminent introduction of new bi-mode for the London to South West long distance services is good news, but it does not materially change the lack of investment in the South West rail system, still leaving us with the 2nd oldest local train fleet in the UK. Research has shown that productivity falls by 6% for every 100 minutes from London and a journey time reduction of 60 minutes would create a £1.2 billion uplift in GVA for the peninsula. The South West has the potential to thrive economically but remains untapped until improvements are introduced. Rail passenger growth in the South West peninsula, has reached 133% in the South West over the last 21 years1, with local services growing at 5.7% pa, compared with rail industry growth forecasting predictions of between 2% and 3.2%. The annual growth in the number of people using the trains in the South West is double the national rate and demand is outstripping supply. Growth in demand has meant that trains have become cramped, and overcrowded, whilst lack of investment and successive timetable changes has meant that services have also become more unreliable and slow. This will prevent further market growth, and it also limits our potential to attract inward investment. We now believe it is time to look at the level of rail service provision to ensure that it meets the needs of Plymouth and the wider peninsula for the future. The 20 Year Plan submitted to Government in November 2016 by the Peninsula Rail Task Force (PRTF) “Closing the gap: The South West Peninsula strategic rail blueprint”, provides what we believe is a strategic blueprint for improvements and we also welcome the recent additional incremental improvements identified through the work undertaken by GWR and Network Rail (NR) as part of the ‘Speed to the West’ study. 1 ORR statistical release 2017 The report sets out the priorities for investment in the Peninsula’s railway network in the following three areas. 1. Resilience and reliability The events at Dawlish showed the need for greater resilience across our transport networks with an ongoing impact on our trade and commerce. Network Rail warns unless action is taken, events similar to those in 2014 between Teignmouth and Dawlish that closed the railways for several months, will increase by over 600% to 1 in every 4 years by 2065. 2. Reduced journey time and improved connectivity Our ambition is for faster journey times between our key UK markets, including; to London from Taunton in 1:30hr, Exeter in 1:45hr, Plymouth and Paignton in 2:15hr and Truro 3:30hr. 3. Capacity and Comfort Our ambition is to transform our connectivity by increasing the frequency of trains, the number of seats and pioneering digital services to drive a world leading quality passenger experience. Cross Country Passenger Rail Franchise Public Consultation The Department for Transport has however recently issued a consultation on its plans for the Cross Country rail franchise (closing 30th August 2018). This document suggests that direct trains from Penzance to the Midlands and the north should end at Plymouth. The document also describes this part of the world as an extremity of the country’. Describing Devon and Cornwall as extremities with fewer passengers undermines the region’s economic contribution and value. Ending direct rail services at Plymouth can only re-enforce misconceptions about the size and scale of our region. The document also suggests that Plymouth passengers be served by the GWR service ‘picking up the slack’. The proposals do not describe how that gap will be filled other than the suggestion of alternations to the GWR franchise. This means that people accessing Plymouth station for work from stations to the west of Plymouth will no longer be able to rely on a service by Cross Country at a time when we were looking forward to an enhanced railway service. The PRTF and its members including Plymouth City Council will be making it clear to the DfT and Cross Country Trains that this proposal should be rejected and continue making the case for greater capacity through increasing the frequency of the trains driving economic growth and greater intra-connectivity within the South West. Proposals 1. Line speed improvements between Totnes and Hemerdon (Plymouth) Overdue enhancements to track should be considered, where instead of delivering like for like, enhancements could see increased line speeds. The track renewal between Totnes and Hemerdon (Plymouth) planned to be undertaken by Network Rail as part of their asset renewals plan in 2018/19 presents a ‘once in a life time’ opportunity to undertake line speed improvements. Initial work undertaken within the ‘Speed to the West’ study has identified that there is an option to upgrade the line speed from 60mph to 75mph for a distance of 14 miles between Totnes and Hemerdon. This would generate a time saving in excess of 3mins for journeys between Plymouth and Exeter. Confirmation is required that the Office of Rail & Road determination of Network Rail’s Western Route Strategy will include the enhancement of the track as part of the existing track renewal project which is already funded. The additional cost of the enhancement work is estimated at between £20m - £30m. GWR and Network Rail have identified that this enhancement scheme has a Benefit to Cost Ratio of 6.07 (rated as very high value for money). 2. Promote the South West Peninsula’s role in the national WiFi pilot on trains We would also ask that the DfT commences work on the improvements to Wi-Fi before 2019, rather than waiting until the start of the new franchise in April 2020, especially given the potential for the GWR franchise to be extended to 2020. Modern standard Wi-Fi and mobile connectivity should be available and usable on all trains to/from and within the South West Peninsula by 2020 in line with the DfT rolling stock perspective[1]. Express trains and Regional services should also have on board entertainment systems that allow customers to use their own devices to access the entertainment and reduce the use of Wi-Fi bandwidth required. As part of the 5G strategy, the Government has committed to improving mobile coverage where people live, work and travel, including on trains. This involves upgrading the digital infrastructure along rail tracks to include installing fibre optic cables and mobile masts to provide gigabit speeds to trains. One pilot area was established last year along the Trans Pennine route between Manchester and York, in partnership with Network Rail. Evidence gathered to inform the PRTF Closing the Gap study demonstrated the link between long journey times and lost economic productivity. Good WiFi connection would significantly improve productivity during journeys by allowing people to use travel time constructively.
Recommended publications
  • Rivers Parrett and Tone Dredge – Bank Profile Restoration Environmental Statement Addendum Non-Technical Summary July 2014
    Rivers Parrett and Tone Dredge – Bank Profile Restoration Environmental Statement Addendum Non-Technical Summary July 2014 Rivers Parrett and Tone Dredge – Bank Profile Restoration ES Addendum v We are the Environment Agency. We protect and improve the environment and make it a better place for people and wildlife. We operate at the place where environmental change has its greatest impact on people’s lives. We reduce the risks to people and properties from flooding; make sure there is enough water for people and wildlife; protect and improve air, land and water quality and apply the environmental standards within which industry can operate. Acting to reduce climate change and helping people and wildlife adapt to its consequences are at the heart of all that we do. We cannot do this alone. We work closely with a wide range of partners including government, business, local authorities, other agencies, civil society groups and the communities we serve. Published by: Environment Agency Horizon house, Deanery Road Bristol BS1 5AH Email: enquiries@environment- agency.gov.uk www.gov.uk/environment-agency Further copies of this report are available from our publications catalogue: © Environment Agency 2013 http://publications.environment- agency.gov.uk or our National Customer All rights reserved. This document may be Contact Centre: T: 03708 506506 reproduced with prior permission of Email: enquiries@environment- the Environment Agency. agency.gov.uk. Rivers Parrett and Tone Dredge: - Bank Profile Restoration Non-Technical Summary Addendum 1 Non-Technical Summary Introduction This Non-Technical Summary (NTS) describes the findings of an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) into the likely significant effects of the dredging of a section of the Rivers Parrett and Tone, including the construction of three stockpiles to store dredged material for up to a year and bank profile restoration.
    [Show full text]
  • Somerset Rivers Authority 2018-19 Annual Report Summary
    Somerset Rivers Authority Summary of Annual Report 2018-19 At a glance KEY POINTS FROM 2018-19 £3.81m 100s EXTRA BIGGEST spent in Somerset on of places benefit across EVER flood risk reduction Somerset use of water injection and greater resilience dredging techniques to maintain the River SuDS Parrett Unique and massive review published around of Somerset SuDS (Sustainable Drainage 15,207 AWARD Systems) highways structures WINNING given extra cleaning to Hills to Levels wins UK stop roads flooding River Prize for natural flood management Private Members’ Bill to establish SRA as Major projects backed separate legal body by SRA include 25th October: passes Third Reading further River Parrett in House of Commons dredging, River Sowy- First Somerset and begins progress King’s Sedgemoor Resilience Day through House of Drain enhancements, Lords Bridgwater Tidal Barrier, Taunton Front cover image: an amphibious excavator and a hopper barge improvements 2 head up the River Frome on SRA works in Frome About Somerset Rivers Authority DURING the devastating floods of 2013-14, Somerset decided to try a new, local approach to tackling flooding. Various partners drew up a 20 Year Flood Action Plan. Somerset Rivers Authority was launched in January 2015 to oversee that Plan and do the extra work that long experience has shown Somerset needs. There is no single answer to Somerset’s many flooding problems, and different parts of the county have different needs. That is why the SRA was set up as a partnership. Different organisations are limited in what they can do individually, but as SRA partners they can get more done by acting collectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Closing the Gap the South West Peninsula Strategic Rail Blueprint
    Closing the gap The South West Peninsula strategic rail blueprint November 2016 For the South West, investment into the rail with other areas. Links to Bristol, Birmingham • Invest £1.5bn to reduce journey times by up to The UK’s record of investment into infrastructure network will unlock a host of benefits, generating and London, as well as other travel hubs such as 14 minutes to Penzance, through infrastructure is mixed; in the South West we strongly believe an additional £7.2bn of GVA and £1.8bn of transport Heathrow, Gatwick and Southampton are vital, as improvements, partial electrification and a new approach is needed. Other countries are benefits in the coming years, transforming the are our interregional provision. The report clearly franchise renewals using different ways to invest and deliver their economy and our communities. With passenger calls for reliable and high quality services, accessible infrastructure, successfully: on time and on budget. • Invest £150m reducing journey times and growth at 128%, we consistently outstrip industry to all, enabling passengers to work and travel in We want to work with Government, Network Rail, increasing core capacity on the Exeter –Waterloo forecasts and our potential is growing. 75% of SW comfort. train operating companies and private sector line businesses stated that rail is vital to their business Since the initial report, we have undertaken partners to explore new avenues and bring benefits and that reducing the journey time to London by 45 • Invest £358m to improve capacity and comfort extensive studies with partners Network Rail, the to the South West as soon as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • South West Peninsula Route Strategy March 2017 Contents 1
    South West Peninsula Route Strategy March 2017 Contents 1. Introduction 1 Purpose of Route Strategies 2 Strategic themes 2 Stakeholder engagement 3 Transport Focus 3 2. The route 5 Route Strategy overview map 7 3. Current constraints and challenges 9 A safe and serviceable network 9 More free-flowing network 9 Supporting economic growth 9 An improved environment 10 A more accessible and integrated network 10 Diversionary routes 15 Maintaining the strategic road network 16 4. Current investment plans and growth potential 17 Economic context 17 Innovation 17 Investment plans 17 5. Future challenges and opportunities 23 6. Next steps 31 i R Lon ou don to Scotla te nd East London Or bital and M23 to Gatwick str Lon ategies don to Scotland West London to Wales The division of rou tes for the F progra elixstowe to Midlands mme of route strategies on t he Solent to Midlands Strategic Road Network M25 to Solent (A3 and M3) Kent Corridor to M25 (M2 and M20) South Coast Central Birmingham to Exeter A1 South West Peninsula London to Leeds (East) East of England South Pennines A19 A69 North Pen Newccaastlstlee upon Tyne nines Carlisle A1 Sunderland Midlands to Wales and Gloucest M6 ershire North and East Midlands A66 A1(M) A595 South Midlands Middlesbrougugh A66 A174 A590 A19 A1 A64 A585 M6 York Irish S Lee ea M55 ds M65 M1 Preston M606 M621 A56 M62 A63 Kingston upon Hull M62 M61 M58 A1 M1 Liver Manchest A628 A180 North Sea pool er M18 M180 Grimsby M57 A616 A1(M) M53 M62 M60 Sheffield A556 M56 M6 A46 A55 A1 Lincoln A500 Stoke-on-Trent A38 M1 Nottingham
    [Show full text]
  • South West Peninsula Route Strategy
    South West Peninsula Route Strategy April 2015 Contents 1. Introduction 5 Purpose of route strategies 5 Setting the first Road Investment Strategy 6 What we will do 7 What we will deliver 8 2. The main issues and challenges 10 Summary of the evidence report 10 3. Our Investment Priorities 12 Modernising the route 13 Maintaining the route 13 Operating the route 14 Expressways 15 4. Planning for future investment 16 The investment planning cycle 16 Preparing for the next round of route strategies 17 Contents Page !3 London to Scotland East Route London Orbital and M23 to Gatwick London to Scotland West strategies London to Wales Felixstowe to Midlands The division of routes for the Solent to Midlands programme of route strategies on the M25 to Solent (A3 and M3) Strategic Road Network Kent Corridor to M25 (M2 and M20) South Coast Central Birmingham to Exeter South West Peninsula A1 London to Leeds (East) East of England South Pennines A19 North Pennines A69 Newcastle upon Tyne Midlands to Wales and Gloucestershire Carlisle A1 Sunderland North and East Midlands M6 A1(M) South Midlands A66 Middlesbrough A595 A174 A66 Information correct at A19 13 March 2015 A590 A1 A64 A585 M6 Yo r k Leeds M1 Irish Sea M55 M65 M606 M621 Kingston upon Hull M62 A63 Preston A56 M62 A1 M61 A180 North Sea M58 M1 Grimsby A628 M18 Manchester M180 Liverpool A616 ( ) M57 A1 M M62 M60 Sheffield M53 A556 M56 A46 Lincoln M6 A1 A55 A500 M1 Stoke-on-Trent A38 Nottingham A52 Derby A50 A453 A483 A5 A38 A42 A46 Norwich M54 A47 A47 A458 A5 M42 Leicester M6 Toll A1 A12 M6 M69
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Constitution of the South West Peninsula
    Constitution of the Transport for the South West Peninsula Shadow Board THE CONSTITUTION OF THE SOUTH WEST PENINSULA SHADOW SUB- NATIONAL TRANSPORT BODY 1. Introduction 1.1 The Cities and Local Government Devolution Act makes provision for the establishment and constitution of Sub-National Transport Bodies (STB) for any area in England (outside of Greater London). 1.2 The establishment of an STB as a statutory body requires approval from Government and a Statutory Instrument must be agreed by Parliament. It has been agreed by each of the Constituent Authorities to establish a shadow Body which will operate until and if a statutory body is established. 1.3 This Constitution will govern the running of the shadow Body and will form the basis of the development of a business case for the establishment of a statutory Body. This business case will be considered for approval by the Body and the Constituent Authorities and will set out the powers that the body will be seeking, to be informed by the SWPSSTB ’s vision, Transport Strategy, and negotiations with the Department for Transport (DfT). If the business case is approved, it will be submitted to the Secretary of State for consideration. 2. Constituent Authorities 2.1 The Constituent Authorities are the following Local Transport Authorities situated within the South West Peninsula:- Cornwall Council Devon County Council Plymouth City Council Somerset County Council Torbay Council 3. Area covered 3.1 This will be the administrative area of the of the Constituent Authorities. 4. Name 4.1 The name of the Body will be the South West Peninsula Shadow Sub-National Transport Body (SWPSSTB).
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Workforce Engagement Report: South West Peninsula
    REGIONAL WORKFORCE ENGAGEMENT REPORT: SOUTH WEST PENINSULA CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 2 1. INTRODUCTION: THE CRITICAL CARE WORKFORCE ...................................................................... 4 1.1 Critical Care in the NHS ........................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Projected demand ................................................................................................................... 4 1.2.1 Census data ..................................................................................................................... 4 1.2.2 Expected increase in patient and NHS need for Critical Care ......................................... 5 1.2.3 Workforce aims ............................................................................................................... 5 2. BACKGROUND TO THE ENGAGEMENT .......................................................................................... 6 2.1 Engagement Aims ................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 UK Wide Application ............................................................................................................... 6 3. THE WORKFORCE IN THE SOUTH WEST PENINSULA ..................................................................... 7 3.1 ICM Training, Clinical Demand and Workforce in the
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Oncology Training in the South West Peninsula
    Clinical Oncology Training in the South West Peninsula Why should you choose to train in Clinical Oncology in the Peninsula? For a start, Peninsula was ranked 1st in England for overall satisfaction for Clinical Oncology in the 2015 and 2016 GMC survey. Where else can you receive first class training during the day and visit the beach after work? The excellent standard of training is reflected in a high pass rate for the FRCR exams and the presentation of the Oncology Registrars’ Forum Trainer Award to one of our consultants in 2014. Training is provided at Derriford Hospital in Plymouth, the Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital in Exeter and the Royal Cornwall Hospital in Truro. A typical 5 year rotation would involve 3 years in Plymouth, 1 year in Exeter and 1 year in Truro although there is some flexibility. There are currently 10 Clinical Oncology Specialty Registrars in the Peninsula. During the course of the rotation registrars will receive training in state of the art radiotherapy techniques including intensity modulated radiotherapy, image guidance, gating, 4DCT, stereotactic radiosurgery, high dose rate and low dose rate brachytherapy. All centres on the rotation have active clinical trials units and trainees will be encouraged to take part in research and quality improvement projects. There are no Medical Oncology trainees in the Peninsula, so Clinical Oncology trainees gain a broad experience in prescribing systemic therapy for all tumour sites. During the ST3 year trainees are supported to attend a basic sciences course in preparation for the FRCR part 1 examinations. Recent trainees have attended the three Biological Basis of Cancer Therapy courses run by the Christie in Manchester, each of which lasts one week.
    [Show full text]
  • Veterans' Health Needs Assessment
    South West Peninsula (Devon, Plymouth, Torbay, Cornwall and Isles of Scilly) Veterans’ Health Needs Assessment September 2014 Acknowledgements This Health Needs Assessment is being produced by consultants, analysts and specialists from across the Public Health teams in Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly, Devon, Plymouth and Torbay. It draws on a range of health needs assessment work that has and is taking place across NHS and Public Health teams across the country. The work of colleagues in Hampshire, Portsmouth, Southampton, Kent and Medway and the North East region is particularly appreciated. Contents Section: Page Number: Foreword …………………………………………………………………………… 1 1. Executive Summary Introduction ………………………………………………………………………… 2 Aims and Objectives ……………………………………………………………… 2 Methods ……………………………………………………………………………. 3 Conclusions ……………………………………………………………………….. 3 Observations ………………………………………………………………………. 3 2. Introduction and Methods Introduction: Health Needs Assessment ……………………………………….. 6 Figure 1: Core Elements to a Needs Assessment …………………………………….. 6 Why Focus on the Armed Forces Community and Veterans? ………………. 6 The South West Region and South West Peninsula Armed Forces Community……………………………………………………….. 9 The Location of Military Bases in the South West Peninsula …………………10 Figure 2: The Location of Ministry of Defence Bases in the South West Peninsula ……………………………………………………………………. 11 Table 1: Military Bases in the South West Peninsula …………………………………. 12 Who Is a Veteran? ……………………………………………………………….. 15 Data Sources: Quantitative Information
    [Show full text]
  • Nick Woollett Report Peninsula Transport Sub-National Transport Body 2019-06-26
    Peninsula Transport Shadow Sub-National Transport Body Regional Evidence Base July 2019 Peninsula Transport Quality information Prepared by Checked by Verified by Approved by Nick Woollett Dominic Walley Stephen Payne Nick Woollett Regional Director Director Principal Consultant Regional Director Transportation Connected Economics Transportation Transportation Revision History Revision Revision date Details Authorised Name Position 0.1 12th July 2019 First Draft Nick Woollett Regional Director Peninsula nd 0.2 22 July 2019 Transport Nick Woollett Regional Director Board Draft 1 29th July 2019 Final Version Nick Woollett Regional Director Prepared f or: Peninsula Transport AECOM Peninsula Transport Prepared for: Peninsula Transport Shadow Sub-National Transport Body Prepared by: Nick Woollett Regional Director Transportation T: +44 (0)1392 663212 E: [email protected] AECOM Limited Belvedere House Pynes Hill Exeter EX2 5WS United Kingdom T: +44 1392 663200 aecom.com © 2019 AECOM Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM. Prepared f or: Peninsula
    [Show full text]
  • The South West Spine
    The South West Spine A report by: Cornwall Council Devon County Council Plymouth City Council Somerset County Council Torbay Council - on the urgent need for increased investment to improve network resilience and to meet unprecedented rising numbers of passengers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Councillor James Currie Leader of Cornwall Council Councillor John Hart Leader, Devon County Council Councillor Tudor Evans Leader, Plymouth City Council Councillor David Hall Cabinet Member for Economic Development, Infrastructure & Innovation, Somerset County Council Gordon Oliver Mayor, Torbay Council -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Contents Summary Report Page 3 Recommendations Page 6 Full Report Page 7 1. The Far South West Economy Page 7 2. Lack of Network Resilience Page 12 3. Current Industry Investment Plans Page 14 4. Gap Analysis: What Needs to be Done Page 19 5. Conclusions Page 22 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 Summary Report Economic Context The Far South West (the SW peninsula from Somerset westwards) has a population of almost 2.2 million people, twice as large as Tyne & Wear, one third larger than Glasgow City Region and similar in size to West Yorkshire (2011 data). The peninsula has: • a large but underperforming economy with low economic productivity; GVA per head in the Far SW is significantly below the national average: GVA per head in Cornwall is 66.3%; in Torbay it is 60.5%;
    [Show full text]
  • Seascape Character Assessment Report
    Seascape Character Assessment for the South West Inshore and Offshore marine plan areas MMO 1134: Seascape Character Assessment for the South West Inshore and Offshore marine plan areas September 2018 Report prepared by: Land Use Consultants (LUC) Project funded by: European Maritime Fisheries Fund (ENG1595) and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Version Author Note 0.1 Sally First draft desk-based report completed May 2016 Marshall Maria Grant 1.0 Sally Updated draft final report following stakeholder Marshall/ consultation, August 2018 Kate Ahern 1.1 Chris MMO Comments Graham, David Hutchinson 2.0 Kate Ahern Final Report, September 2018 2.1 Chris Independent QA Sweeting © Marine Management Organisation 2018 You may use and re-use the information featured on this website (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. Visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government- licence/ to view the licence or write to: Information Policy Team The National Archives Kew London TW9 4DU Email: [email protected] Information about this publication and further copies are available from: Marine Management Organisation Lancaster House Hampshire Court Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 7YH Tel: 0300 123 1032 Email: [email protected] Website: www.gov.uk/mmo Disclaimer This report contributes to the Marine Management Organisation (MMO) evidence base which is a resource developed through a large range of research activity and methods carried out by both MMO and external experts. The opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the views of MMO nor are they intended to indicate how MMO will act on a given set of facts or signify any preference for one research activity or method over another.
    [Show full text]