Potential Vorticity Analysis of Tropical Cyclone Intensification
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Potential Vorticity Dynamics and Tropopause Fold
POTENTIAL VORTICITY DYNAMICS AND TROPOPAUSE FOLD M.D. ANDREI1,2, M. PIETRISI1,2, S. STEFAN1 1 University of Bucharest, Faculty of Physics, P.O.BOX MG 11, Magurele, Bucharest, Romania Emails: [email protected]; [email protected] 2 National Meteorological Administration, Bucuresti-Ploiesti Ave., No. 97, 013686, Bucharest, Romania Received November 1, 2017 Abstract. Extra tropical cyclones evolution depends a lot on the dynamically and thermodynamically interactions between the lower and the upper troposphere. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate the importance of dynamic tropopause fold in the development of a cyclone which affected Romania in 12th and 13th of November, 2016. The coupling between a positive potential vorticity anomaly and the jet stream has caused the fall of dynamic tropopause, which has a great influence in the cyclone deepening. This synoptic situation has resulted in a big amount of precipitation and strong wind gusts. For the study, ALARO limited area spectral model analyzes (e.g., 300 hPa Potential Vorticity, 1,5 PVU field height, 300 hPa winds, mean sea level pressure), data from the Romanian National Meteorological Administration meteorological stations, cross-sections and satellite images (water vapor and RGB) were used. Accordingly, the results of this study will be used in operational forecast, for similar situations which would appear in the future, and can improve it. Key words: potential vorticity, tropopause fold, cyclone. 1. INTRODUCTION Dynamic tropopause is the 1.5 or 2 PVU (potential vorticity units) surface that separates the dry, stable, stratospheric air from the humid, unstable, tropospheric air [1]. The dynamic tropopause fold corresponds to a positive potential vorticity anomaly, with high amplitude in the upper troposphere [2, 3], which induces a cyclonic circulation that propagates to the surface and reduce, under it, static stability. -
Potential Vorticity Diagnosis of a Simulated Hurricane. Part I: Formulation and Quasi-Balanced Flow
1JULY 2003 WANG AND ZHANG 1593 Potential Vorticity Diagnosis of a Simulated Hurricane. Part I: Formulation and Quasi-Balanced Flow XINGBAO WANG AND DA-LIN ZHANG Department of Meteorology, University of Maryland at College Park, College Park, Maryland (Manuscript received 20 August 2002, in ®nal form 27 January 2003) ABSTRACT Because of the lack of three-dimensional (3D) high-resolution data and the existence of highly nonelliptic ¯ows, few studies have been conducted to investigate the inner-core quasi-balanced characteristics of hurricanes. In this study, a potential vorticity (PV) inversion system is developed, which includes the nonconservative processes of friction, diabatic heating, and water loading. It requires hurricane ¯ows to be statically and inertially stable but allows for the presence of small negative PV. To facilitate the PV inversion with the nonlinear balance (NLB) equation, hurricane ¯ows are decomposed into an axisymmetric, gradient-balanced reference state and asymmetric perturbations. Meanwhile, the nonellipticity of the NLB equation is circumvented by multiplying a small parameter « and combining it with the PV equation, which effectively reduces the in¯uence of anticyclonic vorticity. A quasi-balanced v equation in pseudoheight coordinates is derived, which includes the effects of friction and diabatic heating as well as differential vorticity advection and the Laplacians of thermal advection by both nondivergent and divergent winds. This quasi-balanced PV±v inversion system is tested with an explicit simulation of Hurricane Andrew (1992) with the ®nest grid size of 6 km. It is shown that (a) the PV±v inversion system could recover almost all typical features in a hurricane, and (b) a sizeable portion of the 3D hurricane ¯ows are quasi-balanced, such as the intense rotational winds, organized eyewall updrafts and subsidence in the eye, cyclonic in¯ow in the boundary layer, and upper-level anticyclonic out¯ow. -
(Potential) Vorticity: the Swirling Motion of Geophysical Fluids
(Potential) vorticity: the swirling motion of geophysical fluids Vortices occur abundantly in both atmosphere and oceans and on all scales. The leaves, chasing each other in autumn, are driven by vortices. The wake of boats and brides form strings of vortices in the water. On the global scale we all know the rotating nature of tropical cyclones and depressions in the atmosphere, and the gyres constituting the large-scale wind driven ocean circulation. To understand the role of vortices in geophysical fluids, vorticity and, in particular, potential vorticity are key quantities of the flow. In a 3D flow, vorticity is a 3D vector field with as complicated dynamics as the flow itself. In this lecture, we focus on 2D flow, so that vorticity reduces to a scalar field. More importantly, after including Earth rotation a fairly simple equation for planar geostrophic fluids arises which can explain many characteristics of the atmosphere and ocean circulation. In the lecture, we first will derive the vorticity equation and discuss the various terms. Next, we define the various vorticity related quantities: relative, planetary, absolute and potential vorticity. Using the shallow water equations, we derive the potential vorticity equation. In the final part of the lecture we discuss several applications of this equation of geophysical vortices and geophysical flow. The preparation material includes - Lecture slides - Chapter 12 of Stewart (http://www.colorado.edu/oclab/sites/default/files/attached- files/stewart_textbook.pdf), of which only sections 12.1-12.3 are discussed today. Willem Jan van de Berg Chapter 12 Vorticity in the Ocean Most of the fluid flows with which we are familiar, from bathtubs to swimming pools, are not rotating, or they are rotating so slowly that rotation is not im- portant except maybe at the drain of a bathtub as water is let out. -
Fishing Pier Design Guidance Part 1
Fishing Pier Design Guidance Part 1: Historical Pier Damage in Florida Ralph R. Clark Florida Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems May 2010 Table of Contents Foreword............................................................................................................................. i Table of Contents ............................................................................................................... ii Chapter 1 – Introduction................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2 – Ocean and Gulf Pier Damages in Florida................................................... 4 Chapter 3 – Three Major Hurricanes of the Late 1970’s............................................... 6 September 23, 1975 – Hurricane Eloise ...................................................................... 6 September 3, 1979 – Hurricane David ........................................................................ 6 September 13, 1979 – Hurricane Frederic.................................................................. 7 Chapter 4 – Two Hurricanes and Four Storms of the 1980’s........................................ 8 June 18, 1982 – No Name Storm.................................................................................. 8 November 21-24, 1984 – Thanksgiving Storm............................................................ 8 August 30-September 1, 1985 – Hurricane Elena ...................................................... 9 October 31, -
Potential Vorticity
POTENTIAL VORTICITY Roger K. Smith March 3, 2003 Contents 1 Potential Vorticity Thinking - How might it help the fore- caster? 2 1.1Introduction............................ 2 1.2WhatisPV-thinking?...................... 4 1.3Examplesof‘PV-thinking’.................... 7 1.3.1 A thought-experiment for understanding tropical cy- clonemotion........................ 7 1.3.2 Kelvin-Helmholtz shear instability . ......... 9 1.3.3 Rossby wave propagation in a β-planechannel..... 12 1.4ThestructureofEPVintheatmosphere............ 13 1.4.1 Isentropicpotentialvorticitymaps........... 14 1.4.2 The vertical structure of upper-air PV anomalies . 18 2 A Potential Vorticity view of cyclogenesis 21 2.1PreliminaryIdeas......................... 21 2.2SurfacelayersofPV....................... 21 2.3Potentialvorticitygradientwaves................ 23 2.4 Baroclinic Instability . .................... 28 2.5 Applications to understanding cyclogenesis . ......... 30 3 Invertibility, iso-PV charts, diabatic and frictional effects. 33 3.1 Invertibility of EPV ........................ 33 3.2Iso-PVcharts........................... 33 3.3Diabaticandfrictionaleffects.................. 34 3.4Theeffectsofdiabaticheatingoncyclogenesis......... 36 3.5Thedemiseofcutofflowsandblockinganticyclones...... 36 3.6AdvantageofPVanalysisofcutofflows............. 37 3.7ThePVstructureoftropicalcyclones.............. 37 1 Chapter 1 Potential Vorticity Thinking - How might it help the forecaster? 1.1 Introduction A review paper on the applications of Potential Vorticity (PV-) concepts by Brian -
Hurricane & Tropical Storm
5.8 HURRICANE & TROPICAL STORM SECTION 5.8 HURRICANE AND TROPICAL STORM 5.8.1 HAZARD DESCRIPTION A tropical cyclone is a rotating, organized system of clouds and thunderstorms that originates over tropical or sub-tropical waters and has a closed low-level circulation. Tropical depressions, tropical storms, and hurricanes are all considered tropical cyclones. These storms rotate counterclockwise in the northern hemisphere around the center and are accompanied by heavy rain and strong winds (NOAA, 2013). Almost all tropical storms and hurricanes in the Atlantic basin (which includes the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea) form between June 1 and November 30 (hurricane season). August and September are peak months for hurricane development. The average wind speeds for tropical storms and hurricanes are listed below: . A tropical depression has a maximum sustained wind speeds of 38 miles per hour (mph) or less . A tropical storm has maximum sustained wind speeds of 39 to 73 mph . A hurricane has maximum sustained wind speeds of 74 mph or higher. In the western North Pacific, hurricanes are called typhoons; similar storms in the Indian Ocean and South Pacific Ocean are called cyclones. A major hurricane has maximum sustained wind speeds of 111 mph or higher (NOAA, 2013). Over a two-year period, the United States coastline is struck by an average of three hurricanes, one of which is classified as a major hurricane. Hurricanes, tropical storms, and tropical depressions may pose a threat to life and property. These storms bring heavy rain, storm surge and flooding (NOAA, 2013). The cooler waters off the coast of New Jersey can serve to diminish the energy of storms that have traveled up the eastern seaboard. -
Florida Hurricanes and Tropical Storms
FLORIDA HURRICANES AND TROPICAL STORMS 1871-1995: An Historical Survey Fred Doehring, Iver W. Duedall, and John M. Williams '+wcCopy~~ I~BN 0-912747-08-0 Florida SeaGrant College is supported by award of the Office of Sea Grant, NationalOceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce,grant number NA 36RG-0070, under provisions of the NationalSea Grant College and Programs Act of 1966. This information is published by the Sea Grant Extension Program which functionsas a coinponentof the Florida Cooperative Extension Service, John T. Woeste, Dean, in conducting Cooperative Extensionwork in Agriculture, Home Economics, and Marine Sciences,State of Florida, U.S. Departmentof Agriculture, U.S. Departmentof Commerce, and Boards of County Commissioners, cooperating.Printed and distributed in furtherance af the Actsof Congressof May 8 andJune 14, 1914.The Florida Sea Grant Collegeis an Equal Opportunity-AffirmativeAction employer authorizedto provide research, educational information and other servicesonly to individuals and institutions that function without regardto race,color, sex, age,handicap or nationalorigin. Coverphoto: Hank Brandli & Rob Downey LOANCOPY ONLY Florida Hurricanes and Tropical Storms 1871-1995: An Historical survey Fred Doehring, Iver W. Duedall, and John M. Williams Division of Marine and Environmental Systems, Florida Institute of Technology Melbourne, FL 32901 Technical Paper - 71 June 1994 $5.00 Copies may be obtained from: Florida Sea Grant College Program University of Florida Building 803 P.O. Box 110409 Gainesville, FL 32611-0409 904-392-2801 II Our friend andcolleague, Fred Doehringpictured below, died on January 5, 1993, before this manuscript was completed. Until his death, Fred had spent the last 18 months painstakingly researchingdata for this book. -
Appendix 8 Hazard Analysis
Appendix 8 Hazard Analysis Introduction This appendix includes several components. First is an overall discussion of the Hazard Analysis modeling effort, describing the surge (ADCIRC) and wave (WAM, STWAVE) modeling. That first section is followed by a subsidiary section labeled Appendix 8-1 that defines the many acronyms used in the modeling discussion. This is followed by a major section labeled Appendix 8-2 consisting of the Whitepaper of Donald T. Resio, ERDC-CHL, which forms the basis of the storm statistics and JPM methods discussed in the main body of the report. Owing to its prominence in the discussion, it has, for convenience, been referred to as R2007. Note that R2007, itself, includes several appendices; these are identified as Appendices A-G within Appendix 8-2. Finally, a discussion of the rainfall model is included here as Appendix 8-3. Hazard Analysis The hazard analysis required for the risk assessment was based upon the hurricane modeling conducted by a team of Corps of Engineers, FEMA, NOAA, private sector and academic researchers working toward the definition of a new system for estimating hurricane surges and waves. Following is a discussion of the processes used by this team and the steps taken by the risk team to incorporate the results into the risk analysis. The hurricane hazard definition required as input to the risk analysis involved several steps: 1. Selection of the methodology to be used for estimating surges and waves 2. Determination of hurricane probabilities 3. Production of the ADCIRC grid models for the different HPS configurations. 4. Production of the computer system for development of the large number of hydrographs required by the risk model. -
Radar and Rain Gauge Analysis of the Extreme Rainfall During Hurricane Danny’S (1997) Landfall
MAY 2007 M E D L I N E T A L . 1869 Radar and Rain Gauge Analysis of the Extreme Rainfall during Hurricane Danny’s (1997) Landfall JEFFREY M. MEDLIN National Weather Service Forecast Office, Mobile, Alabama SYTSKE K. KIMBALL AND KEITH G. BLACKWELL Department of Earth Sciences, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama (Manuscript received 27 October 2005, in final form 20 June 2006) ABSTRACT As a minimal hurricane, Danny moved over Mobile Bay around 0900 UTC 19 July 1997 and became stationary by midmorning, while situated within a synoptic col. Danny then evolved into an asymmetric storm with an intensely convective rainband that produced torrential rainfall through 1200 UTC 20 July 1997. Danny’s center remained Ͻ100 km from the National Weather Service (NWS) Weather Surveillance Radar-1988 Doppler (WSR-88D) in Mobile, Alabama, for over 48 h, allowing long-term surveillance of the storm’s inner core. This event marked the first time the tropical Z–R relationship was employed on an operational WSR-88D system during tropical cyclone landfall. A radar-estimated maximum rainfall accu- mulation of 1097 mm (43.2 in.) was analyzed over southwestern Mobile Bay. A NWS cooperative rain gauge located on Dauphin Island, Alabama, measured 896 mm (35.28 in.). An adjacent standard rain gauge measured the highest rainfall amount of 932 mm (36.71 in.). This paper investigates the spatial and temporal distribution and potential magnitude of Danny’s torrential rainfall episode over coastal Alabama. It is shown that both gauges and radar seriously underestimated event rainfall. An estimate is given for what could have been the true event rainfall amount. -
FLORIDA HAZARDOUS WEATHER by DAY (To 1994) OCTOBER 1 1969
FLORIDA HAZARDOUS WEATHER BY DAY (to 1994) OCTOBER 1 1969 - 1730 - Clay Co., Orange Park - Lightning killed a construction worker who was working on a bridge. A subtropical storm spawned one weak tornado and several waterspouts in Franklin Co. in the morning. 2 195l - south Florida - The center of a Tropical Storm crossed Florida from near Fort Myers to Vero Beach. Rainfall totals ranged from eight to 13 inches along the track, but no strong winds occurred near the center. The strong winds of 50 to 60 mph were all in squalls along the lower east coast and Keys, causing minor property damage. Greatest damage was from rains that flooded farms and pasture lands over a broad belt extending from Naples, Fort Myers, and Punta Gorda on the west coast to Stuart, Fort Pierce, and Vero Beach on the east. Early fall crops flooded out in rich Okeechobee farming area. Many cattle had to be moved out of flooded area, and quite a few were lost by drowning or starvation. Roadways damaged and several bridges washed out. 2-4 1994 - northwest Florida - Flood/Coastal Flood - The remnants of Tropical Depression 10 moved from the northeast Gulf of Mexico, across the Florida Panhandle, and into Georgia on the 2nd. High winds produced rough seas along west central and northwest Florida coasts causing minor tidal flooding and beach erosion. Eighteen people had to be rescued from sinking boats in the northeast Gulf of Mexico. Heavy rains in the Florida Big Bend and Panhandle accompanied the system causing extensive flooding to roadways, creeks and low lying areas and minor flooding of rivers. -
A Vorticity-And-Stability Diagram As a Means to Study Potential Vorticity
https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2021-31 Preprint. Discussion started: 29 June 2021 c Author(s) 2021. CC BY 4.0 License. A vorticity-and-stability diagram as a means to study potential vorticity nonconservation Gabriel Vollenweider1, Elisa Spreitzer1, and Sebastian Schemm1 1Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland Correspondence: Sebastian Schemm ([email protected]) Abstract. The study of atmospheric circulation from a potential vorticity (PV) perspective has advanced our mechanistic understanding of the development and propagation of weather systems. The formation of PV anomalies by nonconservative processes can provide additional insight into the diabatic-to-adiabatic coupling in the atmosphere. PV nonconservation can be driven by changes in static stability, vorticity or a combination of both. For example, in the presence of localized latent heating, 5 the static stability increases below the level of maximum heating and decreases above this level. However, the vorticity changes in response to the changes in static stability (and vice versa), making it difficult to disentangle stability from vorticity-driven PV changes. Further diabatic processes, such as friction or turbulent momentum mixing, result in momentum-driven, and hence vorticity-driven, PV changes in the absence of moist diabatic processes. In this study, a vorticity-and-stability diagram is introduced as a means to study and identify periods of stability- and vorticity-driven changes in PV. Potential insights and 10 limitations from such a hyperbolic diagram are investigated based on three case studies. The first case is an idealized warm conveyor belt (WCB) in a baroclinic channel simulation. The simulation allows only condensation and evaporation. -
Atlantic Hurricane Season of 1997
2012 MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW VOLUME 127 Atlantic Hurricane Season of 1997 EDWARD N. RAPPAPORT Tropical Prediction Center, National Hurricane Center, NOAA/NWS, Miami, Florida (Manuscript received 12 June 1998, in ®nal form 5 October 1998) ABSTRACT The 1997 Atlantic hurricane season is summarized and the year's tropical storms, hurricanes, and one sub- tropical storm are described. The tropical cyclones were relatively few in number, short lived, and weak compared to long-term climatology. Most systems originated outside the deep Tropics. Hurricane Danny was the only system to make landfall. It produced rainfall totals to near 1 m in southern Alabama and is blamed for ®ve deaths. Hurricane Erika was responsible for the season's two other fatalities, in the coastal waters of Puerto Rico. 1. Introduction This is one of the smallest contributions (by percentage) on record by tropical waves. On average, about 60% of A sharp drop in tropical cyclone activity occurred in tropical cyclones originate from tropical waves (Pasch the Atlantic hurricane basin from 1995±96 to 1997 (Ta- et al. 1998). ble 1). Only seven tropical storms formed in 1997, and Historically, many of the strongest Atlantic tropical just three of those reached hurricane strength (Table 2). cyclones develop from tropical waves between the coast This also represents a considerable reduction from the of Africa and the Lesser Antilles in the August±Sep- long-term averages of ten tropical storms and six hur- tember period. Such tropical cyclone formation appears ricanes. The months of August and September were par- to be related to 1) the wave's ``intrinsic'' potential for ticularly quiet.