Photosynthesis in Lichen: Light Reactions and Protective Mechanisms

8 Photosynthesis in Lichen: Light Reactions and Protective Mechanisms Francisco Gasulla2, Joaquín Herrero1, Alberto Esteban-Carrasco1, Alfonso Ros-Barceló3, Eva Barreno2, José Miguel Zapata1 and Alfredo Guéra1 1University of Alcalá 2University of Valencia 3University of Murcia Spain 1. Introduction Lichens are symbiotic associations (holobionts) established between fungi (mycobionts) and certain groups of cyanobacteria or unicellular green algae (photobionts). This symbiotic association has been essential in establishing the colonization of terrestrial and consequently dry habitats. About 44 genera of algae and cyanobacteria have been reported as lichen photobionts. Due to the uncertain taxonomy of many of these photobionts, these numbers were considered as approximations only. Ahmadjian (1993) estimates that only 25 genera were typical lichen photobionts. The most common cyanobionts are Nostoc, Scytonema, Stigonema, Gloeocapsa, and Calothrix, in order of frequency (Büdel, 1992). Green algal photobionts include Asterochloris, Trebouxia, Trentepohlia, Coccomyxa, and Dictyochloropsis (Gärtner, 1992). These authors assessed that more than 50% of all lichen species are associated with Trebouxia and Asterochloris species. However, this is just estimation since in only 2% of the described lichen species the photobiont genus is reported (Tschermak-Woess, 1989), mostly by the difficulties to isolate and then characterize the algae from the lichen thalli. Lichens are well known for their slow growth and longevity. Their radial growth is measured in millimetres per year (Hale, 1973), while individual lichens live for hundreds or even thousands of years. It is assumed that in lichens the photobiont population is under mycobiont control. Lichenologists have proposed some control mechanisms such as, cell division inhibitors (Honegger, 1987), phytohormones (Backor & Hudak, 1999) or nutrients competition (Crittenden et al., 1994; Schofield et al., 2003). Similar to plants, all lichens photosynthesise. They need light to provide energy to make their own matter. More specifically, the algae in the lichen produce carbohydrates and the fungi take those carbohydrates to grow and reproduce. The amount of light intensity needed for optimal lichen growth varies widely among species. The optimum light intensity range of most algal photobionts in axenic cultures is very low, between 16-27 μmol m-2 s-1. If the response of cultured photobionts to light is similar to that of the natural forms (lichen), then there must be additional mechanisms protecting the algae in the lichen that are not developed under culture conditions. Pigments and crystal of secondary metabolites in the www.intechopen.com 150 Advances in Photosynthesis – Fundamental Aspects upper cortex are supposed to decrease the intensity of light reaching the photobionts especially under desiccated conditions by absorbing certain wavelengths and by reflecting light (Heber et al,. 2007; Scott, 1969; Veerman et al., 2007). Apparently, the balance between energy conservation and energy dissipation is tilted towards dissipation in many poikilohydric autotrophs, whereas, in higher plants, energy conservation assumes dominance over energy dissipation. It thus appears that sensitivity to excess light is higher in the mosses and the lichens than in higher plants (Heber, 2008). Lichens are found among poikilohydric organisms, those that cannot actively regulate their water content, but are capable of surviving long periods in a desiccated state (Kappen & Valladares, 2007). In the dry state many lichens exhibit an enhanced resistence to other stress. For instance, heat resistance up to 70-75 ºC in species from sheltered microhabitats and up to 90-100 ºC in species from exposed microhabitats (Lange, 1953). Desiccation tolerance was described in nematodes and in rotifers observed by van Leeuwenhoek in 1702, and has since been discovered in four other phyla of animals, algae, fungi, bacteria, in ca. 350 species of flowering plants and ferns and in most bryophytes and seeds of flowering plants (Alpert, 2006; Proctor & Tuba, 2002). Among them, algae, lichen and bryophytes can be considered fully desiccation-tolerant plants because can survive very rapid drying events (less than 1 h) and recover respiration and photosynthesis within a few minutes (Oliver & Wood, 1997; Proctor & Smirnoff, 2000). Most lichen-forming fungi and their photobionts are fully adapted to daily wetting and drying cycles, but die off under continuously moist conditions (Dietz & Hartung, 1999; Farrar, 1976a, 1976b). It is well known that photosynthesis in homoiohydric plants is very sensitive to water stress conditions (Heber et al., 2001), especially under high irradiance. Under these conditions, reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation associated to photosynthetic electron transport is enhanced. The question arises of how lichen algae can maintain the function of their photosynthetic machinery under continuous desiccation-rehydration processes. We will review in this chapter the possible mechanisms which should allow maintaining of photosynthesis performance under the life style of poikilohydric organisms. 2. Methods for isolating lichen photobionts One of the main problems to study the mechanisms of photosynthesis in lichens under well- controlled conditions is to develop an appropriate method for isolating the lichen photobionts. Many chlorolichens contains more than one photobiont. For instance, Ramalina farinacea includes two different Trebouxia photobionts (TR1 and TR9) and isolation of these algae allowed to characterise physiological differences between both of them (Casano et al., 2010; del Hoyo et al., 2011). There are different methods in function of the objective of investigation. We can distinguish between those which allow and not allow obtaining axenic cultures. Axenic cultures are useful to study the taxonomy, biochemical, molecular or physiological behaviour of microscopic algae outside the symbiosis. There are lots of methods, but the most popular isolation method was developed by Ahmadjian (1967a, 1967b) and consists of cutting the lichen photobiont layer into thin slices, then grinding it between two glass slides and finally spreading the homogenate on a solid agar medium. There are several variations to this method, but the main common problem to all of them is the long time required after isolation to obtain clones. www.intechopen.com Photosynthesis in Lichen: Light Reactions and Protective Mechanisms 151 On the other hand, non-axenic cultures can be used for studying algal metabolites or enzymatic activities of the lichenized photobionts. These methods consist in homogenization of the lichen thalli, followed by separation of the photobiont from the mycobiont and fragments of thalli using differential centrifugation (Richardson, 1971), gradient centrifugation on CsCl2/KI (Ascaso, 1980) or on Percoll® gradients (Calatayud et al., 2001), and/or filtering (Weissman et al., 2005). Here we resume the fast and simple methods developed in our laboratories (Gasulla et al., 2010): a low-scale isolation method (micromethod) and a large scale one (macromethod). The micromethod for isolation of lichen photobions starts from 15–25 mg dry weight (DW) of lichen material that is washed first in tap water, and then slowly stirred in sterile distilled water in a bucket for 5 min. The fragments of thalli are homogenised in an sterile eppendorf tube with a pellet pestle and resuspended in sterile 1 ml of isotonic buffer (0.3 M sorbitol in 50 mM HEPES pH 7.5). After filtration through sterile muslin, the filtrate is centrifuged at 490×g in a bench-top microcentrifuge (Micro 20, Hettich, Germany) for 5 min. The pellet is resuspended in 200 μl of sterile isotonic buffer and then loaded on 1.5 ml, of sterile 80 % Percoll ® in isotonic buffer. After centrifugation at 10000×g for 10 min a clear green layer must be present near the top of the eppendorf tube and some grey particles and pellet at the bottom of the tube (Fig. 1). The green layer is recovered (ca. 400 μl), avoiding to take any drop of the upper interphase. Then, the green layer is diluted 2-fold with sterile distilled water and centrifuged at 1000×g for 10 min. The supernatant is discarded; the pellet is resuspended in 2 ml of sterile distilled water and a drop of Tween 20 is added. The resulting suspension is sonicated at 40 KHz (Elma Transsonic Digital 470 T, 140% ultrasound power) for 1 min and again centrifuged at 490×g for 5 min. This treatment is repeated five times. The final pellet containing the isolated algal cells is resuspended in 1 ml of sterile distilled water. This micromethod can be scaled up to a macromethod, which allows preparation of large amounts of photobiont cells. Fig. 1. Separation of Ramalina farinacea fractions after centrifugation of the extract of thalli at 10,000×g for 10 min on 40 ml (macromethod), or 1.5 ml (micromethod) of 80 % Percoll ® in isotonic buffer. A–D, each optical micrograph refers to the corresponding Percoll layer; A and C phase contrast microscopy. Scale = 15 μm. * Not real size. Photograph from Gasulla et al., (2010). www.intechopen.com 152 Advances in Photosynthesis – Fundamental Aspects In the macromethod, one to two g DW of lichen thallus are homogenised with a mortar and pestle in 20 ml of sterile isotonic buffer. The steps following are similar to the micromethod, but the volume for resuspension of the first pellet is 1 ml. The second centrifugation step is carried out on 40 ml of sterile 80% Percoll in isotonic buffer

Load more