DOCSLIB.ORG

FSAE 2015 Chassis and Suspension Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FSAE 2015 Chassis and Suspension Final Report EML 4905 Senior Design Project A B.S. THESIS PREPARED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING FSAE 2015 Chassis and Suspension Final Report Alejandro Diaz Osvaldo Fernandez Ricardo Gonzalez Christian Ramos Advisor: Professor Andres Tremante November 24, 2014 This B.S. thesis is written in partial fulfillment of the requirements in EML 4905. The contents represent the opinion of the authors and not the Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering. P a g e | i Ethics Statement and Signatures The work submitted in this B.S. thesis is solely prepared by a team consisting of Alejandro Diaz, Osvaldo Fernandez, Ricardo Gonzalez, and Christian Ramos and it is original. Excerpts from others’ work have been clearly identified, their work acknowledged within the text and listed in the list of references. All of the engineering drawings, computer programs, formulations, design work, prototype development and testing reported in this document are also original and prepared by the same team of students. Alejandro Diaz Osvaldo Fernandez Ricardo Gonzalez Christian Ramos Team Leader Team Member Team Member Team Member Dr. Andres Tremante Faculty Advisor P a g e | ii Table of Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ iv List of Tables ................................................................................................................................ vii Abstract ........................................................................................................................................ viii 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Problem Statement ................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Motivation ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Literature Survey .................................................................................................................. 3 1.3.1 Vehicle Handling Characteristics................................................................................... 4 1.3.2 Suspension Rates and Damping ..................................................................................... 6 1.3.3 Suspension Geometry .................................................................................................... 9 1.3.4 Chassis Design ............................................................................................................. 11 1.4 Addressing Global Design .................................................................................................. 12 1.5 Constraints and Other Considerations ................................................................................ 13 2. Conceptual Design (Design Alternatives) ................................................................................ 15 2.1 Material Selection ............................................................................................................... 15 2.1.1 Suspension ................................................................................................................... 15 2.1.2 Chassis ......................................................................................................................... 16 2.2 Design Process .................................................................................................................... 16 2.3 Prototype 1 .......................................................................................................................... 20 2.3.1 Chassis ......................................................................................................................... 21 3. Proposed Design ....................................................................................................................... 41 3.1 Chassis ................................................................................................................................ 41 3.1.1 Ergonomic Integration ................................................................................................. 41 3.1.2 Frame Improvements ................................................................................................... 45 3.2 Suspension .......................................................................................................................... 49 3.2.1 Upright and Wheel Hub ............................................................................................... 49 3.2.2 Suspension Geometry .................................................................................................. 54 3.3 Standards Used in the Project ............................................................................................. 59 3.3.1 System Level Standards ............................................................................................... 59 3.3.2 Component Level Standards ........................................................................................ 59 4. Project Timeline & Responsibilities ......................................................................................... 60 4.1 Gantt Chart .......................................................................................................................... 60 4.2 Task Distribution ................................................................................................................ 61 5. Engineering Design and Analysis ............................................................................................. 61 5.1 Evaluation of Raw Tire Data .............................................................................................. 61 5.2 Elementary Vehicle Analysis .............................................................................................. 71 5.3 Suspension Roll and Ride Rates ......................................................................................... 75 5.4 Suspension Geometry ......................................................................................................... 80 5.4.1 Suspension Geometry Camber analysis W/O Body Roll for prototype 1.................... 80 5.4.2 Suspension Geometry Camber analysis W/O Body Roll for prototype 2.................... 83 5.5 Chassis Stiffness ................................................................................................................. 88 5.6 FEA Analysis ...................................................................................................................... 90 5.5.1 Chassis ......................................................................................................................... 90 5.5.2 Suspension ................................................................................................................... 94 P a g e | iii 5.6. Cost Analysis ................................................................................................................... 100 5.6.1 Prototype 1 ................................................................................................................. 101 5.6.2 Prototype 2 ................................................................................................................. 103 6. Prototype 2 Manufacturing ..................................................................................................... 105 6.1 Frame and Suspension Manufacturing.............................................................................. 105 6.2 Upright and Hub Manufacturing ....................................................................................... 112 7. Testing and Evaluation ........................................................................................................... 116 7.1 Testing............................................................................................................................... 116 7.2 Evaluation ......................................................................................................................... 118 8. Design Considerations ............................................................................................................ 119 8.1 Maintenance ...................................................................................................................... 119 8.2 Environmental Impact ....................................................................................................... 119 8.3 Risk Assessment ............................................................................................................... 119 9. Conclusion .............................................................................................................................. 121 10. References ............................................................................................................................. 122 11. Appendix ............................................................................................................................... 123 Appendix A: 2015 FSAE Rules .............................................................................................. 123 Appendix B: Sample .TIR File for Tire Analysis ................................................................... 141 Appendix C: Formulas
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Towards Adaptive and Directable Control of Simulated Creatures Yeuhi Abe AKER
    --A Towards Adaptive and Directable Control of Simulated Creatures by Yeuhi Abe Submitted to the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science and Engineering at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY February 2007 © Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2007. All rights reserved. Author ....... Departmet of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Febri- '. 2007 Certified by Jovan Popovid Associate Professor or Accepted by........... Arthur C.Smith Chairman, Department Committee on Graduate Students MASSACHUSETTS INSTInfrE OF TECHNOLOGY APR 3 0 2007 AKER LIBRARIES Towards Adaptive and Directable Control of Simulated Creatures by Yeuhi Abe Submitted to the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science on February 2, 2007, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science and Engineering Abstract Interactive animation is used ubiquitously for entertainment and for the communi- cation of ideas. Active creatures, such as humans, robots, and animals, are often at the heart of such animation and are required to interact in compelling and lifelike ways with their virtual environment. Physical simulation handles such interaction correctly, with a principled approach that adapts easily to different circumstances, changing environments, and unexpected disturbances. However, developing robust control strategies that result in natural motion of active creatures within physical simulation has proved to be a difficult problem. To address this issue, a new and ver- satile algorithm for the low-level control of animated characters has been developed and tested. It simplifies the process of creating control strategies by automatically ac- counting for many parameters of the simulation, including the physical properties of the creature and the contact forces between the creature and the virtual environment.
    [Show full text]
  • 7.6 Moments and Center of Mass in This Section We Want to find a Point on Which a Thin Plate of Any Given Shape Balances Horizontally As in Figure 7.6.1
    Arkansas Tech University MATH 2924: Calculus II Dr. Marcel B. Finan 7.6 Moments and Center of Mass In this section we want to find a point on which a thin plate of any given shape balances horizontally as in Figure 7.6.1. Figure 7.6.1 The center of mass is the so-called \balancing point" of an object (or sys- tem.) For example, when two children are sitting on a seesaw, the point at which the seesaw balances, i.e. becomes horizontal is the center of mass of the seesaw. Discrete Point Masses: One Dimensional Case Consider again the example of two children of mass m1 and m2 sitting on each side of a seesaw. It can be shown experimentally that the center of mass is a point P on the seesaw such that m1d1 = m2d2 where d1 and d2 are the distances from m1 and m2 to P respectively. See Figure 7.6.2. In order to generalize this concept, we introduce an x−axis with points m1 and m2 located at points with coordinates x1 and x2 with x1 < x2: Figure 7.6.2 1 Since P is the balancing point, we must have m1(x − x1) = m2(x2 − x): Solving for x we find m x + m x x = 1 1 2 2 : m1 + m2 The product mixi is called the moment of mi about the origin. The above result can be extended to a system with many points as follows: The center of mass of a system of n point-masses m1; m2; ··· ; mn located at x1; x2; ··· ; xn along the x−axis is given by the formula n X mixi i=1 Mo x = n = X m mi i=1 n X where the sum Mo = mixi is called the moment of the system about i=1 Pn the origin and m = i=1 mn is the total mass.
    [Show full text]
  • Meritor® Independent Front Suspension Drivetrain System
    MERITOR® INDEPENDENT FRONT SUSPENSION DRIVETRAIN SYSTEM Meritor’s state-of-the-art modular drivetrain system for all-wheel drive (AWD) commercial trucks features the Independent Front Suspension (IFS) module equipped with modern steering geometry and air disc brake technology, and a low-profile shift on-the-fly transfer case. The IFS, available in drive or non-drive options, is a part of Meritor’s field-proven and widely acclaimed ProTec™ ISAS® line of independent suspensions. This bolt-on, modular solution does not require modifications to existing frame rails and maintains vehicle ride height. FEATURES AND BENEFITS ■ Proven Independent Suspension Axle System technology – The ISAS product line has been fitted on high-mobility vehicles for over 20 years. The Independent Front Suspension system leverages decades of expertise in designing and manufacturing field-proven systems. ■ Bolt-on system – The Independent Front Suspension does not require modifications to frame rails ■ 5 to 12 inch ride height reduction – Improves vehicle roll stability versus best-in-class beam axle ■ Modular solution – Maintains the same ride height of a rear-wheel drive (RWD) truck ■ Lower center of gravity – Better vehicle maneuverability and stability for safe and confident handling ■ 60 percent reduction in cab and driver-absorbed power – Ride harshness improvements as well as reduction in unwanted steering feedback lead to less physical fatigue for the driver, and higher reliability of the cab ■ 2-times the wheel travel – The Independent Front Suspension provides
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Design and Optimization of the Aerodynamics of a FSAE Car Using Solid Works ANSYS & XFLR5
    Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering 2016 Vol II WCE 2016, June 29 - July 1, 2016, London, U.K. Complete Design and Optimization of the Aerodynamics of a FSAE Car using Solid works ANSYS & XFLR5 Aravind Prasanth, Sadjyot Biswal, Aman Gupta, Azan Barodawala Member, IAENG Abstract: This paper will give an insight in to how an II. AERODYNAMICS Aerodynamics package of a FSAE car is developed as well as The most important factor in achieving better top speed is the various stages of optimizing and designing the Front wing and Rear wing. The under tray will be explained in a the traction due to the tires and this depends upon the companion paper. The paper will focus on the reasons to use normal force. It can be achieved by increasing the mass, aerodynamic devices, choice of the appropriate wing profile, its however, this takes a toll on the acceleration. Therefore, the 2D and 3D configuration and investigation of the effect of option available is to increase the downforce. The drawback ground proximity for the front wing. Finally, various softwares of adding aerodynamics package will result in the addition are implemented to identify the correct configurations for the of drag. Front and Rear wing. It is important to determine how much top speed can be sacrificed without compensating on the track performance. Index Terms— ANSYS, CFD, downforce, FSAE, XFLR5 A. Sacrificial top speed The acceleration of the car can be expressed as. I. INTRODUCTION he aim is to create a high downforce aerodynamics T package for the FSAE (Formula Society of Automotive (1) Engineers) race car.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerodynamic Development of a IUPUI Formula SAE Specification Car with Computational Fluid Dynamics(CFD) Analysis
    Aerodynamic development of a IUPUI Formula SAE specification car with Computational Fluid Dynamics(CFD) analysis Ponnappa Bheemaiah Meederira, Indiana- University Purdue- University. Indianapolis Aerodynamic development of a IUPUI Formula SAE specification car with Computational Fluid Dynamics(CFD) analysis A Directed Project Final Report Submitted to the Faculty Of Purdue School of Engineering and Technology Indianapolis By Ponnappa Bheemaiah Meederira, In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Technology Committee Member Approval Signature Date Peter Hylton, Chair Technology _______________________________________ ____________ Andrew Borme Technology _______________________________________ ____________ Ken Rennels Technology _______________________________________ ____________ Aerodynamic development of a IUPUI Formula SAE specification car with Computational 3 Fluid Dynamics(CFD) analysis Table of Contents 1. Abstract ..................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 5 3. Problem statement ..................................................................................................................... 7 4. Significance............................................................................................................................... 7 5. Literature review
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release
    PRESS RELEASE www.youtube.com/fordofeurope www.twitter.com/FordEu www.youtube.com/fordo feurope Ford Mustang Mach 1 touches down in Europe • Track-focused Mustang Mach 1 introduces enhanced powertrain and aerodynamic features for the most agile and responsive Mustang driving experience in Europe ever • V8 power boosted to 460 PS for 0-100 km/h in 4.4 seconds. TREMEC manual and 10- speed auto transmissions feature limited-slip differential. Downforce increased 22 per cent • Sophisticated technologies for track driving fun include MagneRide® adaptive suspension, selectable Drive Modes including Track mode, and Track Apps including Launch Control COLOGNE, Germany, May 18, 2021 – First deliveries of the new Ford Mustang Mach 1 – the most track-focused Mustang ever offered to customers in Europe – are now underway, Ford today announced. Enhancing the powerful performance of the world’s best-selling sports car with a specially- calibrated 460 PS 5.0-litre V8 engine 1 and unique transmission specifications, Mustang Mach 1 also introduces bespoke aerodynamics and new performance component cooling systems for greater agility and consistent on-track performance. Mustang Mach 1 delivers 0-100 km/h acceleration in 4.4 seconds and increases downforce by 22 per cent compared with Mustang GT for enhanced cornering capability and high-speed stability. Introducing the iconic Mach 1 moniker to the region for the first time, the limited-edition model also delivers race-derived styling, specification and detailing for performance car fans. “There’s a reason Mustang is the world’s best-selling sports car, but the Mach 1 is going to elevate Mustang to another level in the hearts of performance car fans on this side of the Atlantic,” said Matthias Tonn, Mustang Mach 1 chief programme engineer for Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • A Novel Universal Corner Module for Urban Electric Vehicles: Design, Prototype, and Experiment
    A Novel Universal Corner Module for Urban Electric Vehicles: Design, Prototype, and Experiment by Allison Waters A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Applied Science in Mechanical Engineering Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2017 c Allison Waters 2017 I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii Abstract This thesis presents the work of creating and validating a novel corner module for a three-wheeled urban electric vehicle in the tadpole configuration. As the urban population increases, there will be a growing need for compact, personal transportation. While urban electric vehicles are compact, they are inherently less stable when negotiating a turn, and they leave little space for passengers, cargo and crash structures. Corner modules provide an effective solution to increase the space in the cabin and increase the handling capabilities of the vehicle. Many corner module designs have been produced in the hopes of increasing the cabin space and improving the road holding capabilities of the wheel. However, none have been used to increase the turning stability of the vehicle via an active camber mechanism while remaining in an acceptable packaging space. Active camber mechanisms are also not a new concept, but they have not been implemented in a narrow packaging space with relatively large camber angle. Parallel mechanism research and vehicle dynamics theory were combined to generate and analyse this new corner module design.
    [Show full text]
  • Passionate Mustang Team Works After-Hours to Create New Performance Pack for Ultimate Road- Hugging Thrill Ride
    FORD MEDIA CENTER Passionate Mustang Team Works After-Hours to Create New Performance Pack for Ultimate Road- Hugging Thrill Ride • New Mustang GT Performance Pack Level 2 raises Mustang GT’s game and bridges the gap between GT Performance Pack and GT350 • Performance Pack Level 2 is accentuated by a lower, more aggressive stance, aerodynamically balanced high-performance front splitter and rear spoiler – all designed to add more downforce to attack curves for an exhilarating feel behind the wheel • Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 tires, retuned steering and MagneRide® suspension deliver ultra- responsive road-gripping capabilities in new manual transmission-equipped Mustang GT with Performance Pack Level 2 DEARBORN, Mich., Oct. 23, 2017 – Evenings in the garage. Weekends at the track. Gearheads everywhere can appreciate the extra time and effort the Mustang team took to quickly prototype and hone the Performance Pack Level 2 for the new 2018 Ford Mustang GT. “A passion to create something special is what really drove this project,” said Tom Barnes, Mustang vehicle engineering manager. “And that really showed in the off-the-clock way we went about doing our work.” Longtime tire and wheel engineer Chauncy Eggleston led development of unique 19-inch wheels that help provide notable steering and handling response improvements. Mustang veteran Jonathan Gesek, former aerodynamics specialist at NASA and now with Ford’s aerodynamics group, spearheaded development of a high-performance front splitter and rear spoiler. And Jamie Cullen, Ford supervisor for vehicle dynamics development, led road test efforts to ensure the car delivers ultra-responsive steering, braking and handling performance.
    [Show full text]
  • Simplified Tools and Methods for Chassis and Vehicle Dynamics Development for FSAE Vehicles
    Simplified Tools and Methods for Chassis and Vehicle Dynamics Development for FSAE Vehicles A thesis submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the School of Dynamic Systems of the College of Engineering and Applied Science by Fredrick Jabs B.A. University of Cincinnati June 2006 Committee Chair: Randall Allemang, Ph.D. Abstract Chassis and vehicle dynamics development is a demanding discipline within the FSAE team structure. Many fundamental quantities that are key to the vehicle’s behavior are underdeveloped, undefined or not validated during the product lifecycle of the FSAE competition vehicle. Measurements and methods dealing with the yaw inertia, pitch inertia, roll inertia and tire forces of the vehicle were developed to more accurately quantify the vehicle parameter set. An air ride rotational platform was developed to quantify the yaw inertia of the vehicle. Due to the facilities available the air ride approach has advantages over the common trifilar pendulum method. The air ride necessitates the use of an elevated level table while the trifilar requires a large area and sufficient overhead structure to suspend the object. Although the air ride requires more rigorous computation to perform the second order polynomial fitment of the data, use of small angle approximation is avoided during the process. The rigid pendulum developed to measure both the pitch and roll inertia also satisfies the need to quantify the center of gravity location as part of the process. For the size of the objects being measured, cost and complexity were reduced by using wood for the platform, simple steel support structures and a knife edge pivot design.
    [Show full text]
  • Tech 03: Spring Spacing, Roll Stiffness and Transverse Weight Transfer
    Tech 03: Spring spacing, Roll Stiffness and Transverse Weight Transfer By ZŝĐŚĂƌĚ͞Doc͟ Hathaway, H&S Prototype and Design, LLC. Understanding how your choice of spring type, spring stiffness, spring placement and spring angle influence the front and rear roll stiffness and the roll stiffness distribution is important to understanding how the weight is distributed to the tires when the race car is cornering. In this tutorial we will work primarily with helping you understand how roll stiffness is determined and how your choice of the above mentioned variables affects its value. Just as the springs act to support the race car weight and control the vertical chassis motions, they also work to control the amount of roll the race car chassis has when cornering. This resistance to chassis roll offered by the springs is called roll stiffness. In addition to the roll stiffness, the front and rear roll center heights also determine how each of the suspensions transfer the cornering forces, the weight transfer and how much roll the chassis takes on during cornering. Tech 01- Springs, Shocks and your Suspension which was posted earlier is a reference for this Tech session. A quick overview of that material is included to assure you have correct suspension values with which to work. The terminology There are two primary angles that govern how race cars transfer weight during racing maneuvers. The first is the roll angle which is the angle, side-to-side, the car seeks as the turn is entered and as the car proceeds through the turn. If there is a roll angle, there MUST be a center for that rotation to occur about; that defines the roll center.
    [Show full text]
  • Chassis Tuning 101 Matt Murphy’S Dirt Oval Chassis Tuning Guide
    Chassis Tuning 101 Matt Murphy’s Dirt Oval Chassis Tuning Guide PREFACE Over the last 17 years of my life, I have raced Dirt Oval all over the United States, on foam tires and rubber, hard packed and loose dirt. I have learned a lot about chassis setup on many different track surfaces with many different types of cars. Much of what I have learned is from trial and error, and quite a bit I have learned from doing plain old research on race car chassis dynamics. My goal now is to take what I have learned, and share it with you, but I want to do so in the simplest, easiest to understand manner that I possibly can. I certainly do not know everything, and I am not always right, however I can say that it is rare that I work on a particular chassis setup, and do not find improvement with each adjustment. My theories are just that, and are intended only to help you better enjoy your RC race cars, no matter which make and model you choose. Some things I pay much more attention to than others when it comes to chassis setup, but please understand there is no right or wrong, there is simply what works best for YOU! INDEX: Chapter 1 - Introduction to Dirt Oval Chassis Setup Chapter 2 - Tires Chapter 3 - Springs, Shocks, and Chassis Height Chapter 4 - Toe, Camber, Caster, and Wheel Spacing Chapter 5 - Droop Chapter 6 - Camber Links and Roll Centers Chapter 7 - Wheelbase, Kickup, and Squat Chapter 8 - Sway Bars Chapter 9 - Transmissions and Drive Train Page 1 of 21 Chapter 1: Introduction to Dirt Oval Chassis Setup: Chassis Setup is the most important factor in having a fast Dirt Oval car.
    [Show full text]
  • Control System for Quarter Car Heavy Tracked Vehicle Active Electromagnetic Suspension
    Control System for Quarter Car Heavy Tracked Vehicle Active Electromagnetic Suspension By: D. A. Weeks J.H.Beno D. A. Bresie A. Guenin 1997 SAE International Congress and Exposition, Detroit, Ml, Feb 24-27, 1997. PR- 223 Center for Electromechanics The University of Texas at Austin PRC, Mail Code R7000 Austin, TX 78712 (512) 471-4496 January 2, 1997 Control System for Single Wheel Station Heavy Tracked Vehicle Active Electromagnetic Suspension D. A. Weeks, J. H. Beno, D. A. Bresie, and A. M. Guenin The Center for Electromechanics The University of Texas at Austin PRC, Mail Code R7000 Austin TX 78712 (512) 471-4496 ABSTRACT necessary control forces. The original paper described details concerning system modeling and new active suspension con­ Researchers at The University of Texas Center for trol approaches (briefly summarized in Addendum A for read­ Electromechanics recently completed design, fabrication, and er convenience). This paper focuses on hardware and software preliminary testing of an Electromagnetic Active Suspension implementation, especially electronics, sensors, and signal pro­ System (EMASS). The EMASS program was sponsored by cessing, and on experimental results for a single wheel station the United States Army Tank Automotive and Armaments test-rig. Briefly, the single wheel test-rig (fig. 1) simulated a Command Center (TACOM) and the Defense Advanced single Ml Main Battle Tank roadwheel station at full scale, Research Projects Agency (DARPA). A full scale, single wheel using a 4,500 kg (5 ton) block of concrete for the sprung mass mockup of an M1 tank suspension was chosen for evaluating and actual M1 roadwheels and roadarm for unsprung mass.
    [Show full text]