DOCSLIB.ORG

A Selection from His Civil War Letters. Edited by John D. Hayes. 3 Vols. Ithaca, N.Y: Cornell University Press, 1969

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Selection from His Civil War Letters. Edited by John D. Hayes. 3 Vols. Ithaca, N.Y: Cornell University Press, 1969 Du Pont, Samuel Francis. Samuel Francis Du Pont: A Selection from His Civil War Letters. Edited by John D. Hayes. 3 vols. Ithaca, N.Y: Cornell University Press, 1969. Volume I Southern naval people leaving Washington in December 1860, loyalty to the general government and Delaware, Commodore Shubrick, Henry Winter Davis, loyalty national demoralization, 3-7 South Carolina secession, let her go, 9 Buchanan administration, 9-10 Southern naval officers and state allegiance, 10 Committee of 33, Lewis Cass, Charleston, 10-11 Unionism, Andrew Jackson, 12-13 Harm done by newspapers, 13, 17 Scourged of our boasting as a nation, 13 Jacob Thompson, Howell Cobb, 14-15, 17 Thomas Hicks, Maryland, secession, 15-16 Secessionist seizure of Federal property, 17-18 Naval Academy, southern cadets, 18-19 Virginia legislature, 19 Star of the West, 19-20 Officer resignations 20-21 Abolitionists, weak government, asks Henry Winter Davis support Crittenden compromise, 23- 24 Filibustering, 24 Firing on Star of the West and taking of the forts has strengthened the Republicans, 24 Advice on a possible naval resignation, Chritianity, 25-26 Border states, treason in Maryland, 27 Complains of naval resignations, 27-29 Harriet Lane, Buchanan, 29 Southerners think they can secede and than make arrangements with a foreign power, 29-30 Buchanan ill, 30 Henry Winter Davis speech, wants him to be Speaker of the House, possible cabinet appointment, 31-34 Naval resignations, desertions, 32-33 Report of Gilmer as Secretary of the Navy, 35 Washington peace conference, Crittenden compromise, 36-37 Demoralization, seizure of forts, 37 John A. Dix, Joseph Holt, 37 Disgrace of Twiggs surrender, Pensacola Navy yard, Scott, Anderson, 37 Peace conference, Corwin amendment, 38 John Tyler, 38 Lincoln and his probable policy, 38-39 Salmon Chase, 39 Cabinet, making, Gilmer, Bates, Lincoln, Montgomery Blair, 40-41 Powhatan, 42 Fort Sumter, Maryland, North Carolina, 42 1 Lincoln cabinet, Seward, Gideon Welles, 42-43 Deplores extremist southerners and extremists in the Senate, 43 James A. Bayard’s proposal for negotiating with Confederates, 44 Weakness in administration and Congress, 45 Naval resignations, 45 William Porcher Miles, 45-46 Lincoln inauguration, 46 Reported evacuation of Fort Sumter, Breckinridge Democrats, Republicans, Pennsylvania, 46-47 Fears future of the government, 47 Stephen Douglas and reconstruction, 47 Tariff, 47 Jefferson Davis, 48 Senate debate, Breckinridge and Douglas, 48 Charleston, Sumter, 51-52 Baltimore, Governor Hicks, 52-53 Expedition for Norfolk, Merrimac, 53-55 Urges nephew to enlist and defend his country, 55 Welles, procure steamers, charter for three months, 56 Farragut sticks by the Union, 57 Government powerless, deplores influence of Cassius Clay, James Lane and the Blairs, cabinet more moderate, 58-59 Affairs in Philadelphia, Washington, troops, engineer mobbed in Baltimore, 60-61 Annapolis, supplies, Butler, iceboat, 62-63 Naval resignations, 64-65 Opening of the Annapolis route (to Philadelphia or Washington?), 66-67 Uprising in country, folly of Virginia, 67 Resignations from army and navy, 67 Fitz John Porter, Winfield Scott, 68 Resignations, 69 James A. Bayard, 69-70 Engineers, 71 Franklin Buchanan, on taking up arms for Confederacy, 72-73 Blockade plans, 73-76 Purchasing and chartering steamers to turn them in warships, 75 Beauregard, Virginians, weakness of southern cause, 77 Pirates and death sentences, 77-78 Daily work, going to Washington, 78-79 Pensacola, 78 Need more men in Virginia, Confederate weakness, great faith in Union success, superior numbers and resources, 80 Secession, Crittenden, 80 Deplores Chase and Blair influence, abolitionists, 81 Confederates think they are already beaten, Washington, 81-82 Unimpressed with people in Navy Department, 85-86 Coal depot, 86 Seward, 86-87 2 Need to carry on war with overwhelming force, 88 General Mansfield, 89 Rode around perimeter of Washington, defenses, 91—92 Peace movement, opposes reconstruction, 93 Troop review, Lincoln, Scott, 93-94 Lincoln, 94 Franklin Buchanan, explaining his decision to go with the Confederacy, critical of behavior of northern soldiers, 94-100 Creation of a volunteer navy, 100-101 Character of Washington, 101 Bull Run campaign, Scott, McDowell, demoralization of the army, 102, 105, 107-8 Kentucky Unionists, Crittenden, 103 Privateers, Cuba, 103 Privateers, 106 Danger to Washington, General Mansfield, Scott, Gustavus Fox, fort, Cameron, 108-9 McClellan, 109 Ills of a volunteer military, 110 McDowell, Bull Run, providence, 110 Blockade, 111 Greeley attacks on Seward and Cameron, 112 Washington defenses, new troops, morale, 112-13 Welles, Fox, expeditions, Thomas W. Sherman, 113-14 Dead and wounded at Bull Run, 114 Confederate prisoners, hatred, 114-15 Naval reports, Scott, 116 Expeditions, New York, 118-19 Church service, communion, 123 Orders for Du Pont, Fox, Welles, 123-24 Henry Winter Davis, Bull Run, 125 McClellan and discipline, 125 Fear of letters being opened by disloyal clerks, 125 Needs to be doing important work, 125-26 Welles orders Du Point to be in charge of sea coast expedition, providence, 126-27, 129 War and religious principles, 127 Dinner with Prince Napoleon, Seward, 128 Land boats, 130-31 Jefferson Davis and Baltimore, threat to Washington, 132 Increasing Confederate forces, small union forces, 133 Effects of Bull Run, 134 Desertions from army and navy, 135 Northern restlessness, debt, 136 Construction of gunboats, 137-38 Navy Department inefficiency, 138 Privateers, French, 139 Blockade proclamation, 140 Wants Henry Winter Davis to be a general, 141 3 North Carolina Coast, 142-43 Seniority in the navy, 143 McClellan,143 and n. Scott, panic in Washington, Thomas W. Sherman, Welles, Fox, 147-48 Hampton Roads, complains about Stringham, Goldsborough, 149, 151 Welles, removes Du Pont from Philadelphia naval yard and assigns him to Blockading Squadron, Goldsborough, 152 William D. Porter, 153 Decline of seniority, new assignment to blockading squadron, officers, 153-56 Expedition officers, 156-59 Scott, McClellan, October a good month for seacoast operations, 160 Details on McClellan, September 1861, 160 Seward, Lincoln, discussion on the expedition, Burnside, Cameron, McClellan, Fox, 162-64 Du Pont’s will drawn, 164-65 Circular to commanding officers, 166 Wabash, 169ff Mess arrangements, 170 Discussion with officers about Port Royal expedition, 170-71 Tybee Island, Fox, John Rodgers, 174 His squadron duties, 175 Blockade running, 177-78 Study Port Royal in preparation, 179 Water for troops, 181 General Thomas W. Sherman, 181 Generals and Port Roya, engineers, transports, 182-84 Promotions of three midshipmen, 186 Maps, Thomas W. Sherman, plans, 187-88 Ball’s Bluff, 189 Religious service, Thomas W. Sherman, 192 Regulating signals in the fleet, 194 Sealed orders, 196 To Fox, tell Welles expedition is off, 199 Ships and positions, 200 Newspaper accounts of Port Royal expedition, 201 Order of sailing, oppositive page 203 Cape Hatteras, 203-4 Journal letter, details of the voyage, 203ff Winds scattered fleet, 205-8 Charleston, 209ff Port Royal, 215ff Hilton Head batteries, 216 Account of voyage and plans to Henry Winter Davis, 218-20 Wind delays attacks on batteries, 220 Victory at Port Royal, army, under fire, retreat was a stampede, 223-27 Fall of Hilton Head, 227 Letter to Goldsborough describing success at Port Royal, purely a naval victory, 228-30 4 Terror in the southern country, 229 Report of Port Royal to Fox, 230-32 Idea of float machine shop for ship repairs, 235 Beaufort, river, slaves plundering, desolation, desertion, 235-38 Gallantry at Port Royal, 238-39 Ships coming in and out, 240-41 Chastened by God in this war, 241 Henry Winter Davis rejoices over Port Royal, enjoyed Du Pont’s account of the battle, Thomas W. Sherman, 243-45 Maryland elections, 245-46 Welles, congratulations on the Port Royal victory, Du Point response 246, 266-67 Inspects damage to ships, 247 Assessment of the battle, disapproves Fox publishing his private letter, 250-51 Ship description, 252 Newspaper accounts of Port Royal, 253 Cotton question, destruction, 255 Captain Rodgers, Tybee Island, 256-57 Dahlgren squadron ordnance, 259-60 Explosion of mills at home, 261-62 Tybee Island, 261 Fernandina, 263-64 Fox, Thomas W. Sherman, 264 To James W. Grimes, naval expeditions, Savannah, blockade, Charleston, 267-69 Slave intelligence, Savannah, 271 20,000 more men would give us Charleston and Savannah, 272 Stone fleet, Fox, Du Pont doubtful, 272-73, 275 Destruction of cotton and slave quarters, 274 Progress, Tybee Island, use of gunboats, 279 Slaveholders abandon property, blacks plunder, he was wrong, slaves are horribly treated, South Carolina should be dealt with as Cromwell did Ireland, 281-82 Administration errors help Democratic party, 283 Success and public expectation, 284-85 Need more gunboats, 285 Frustrated by blockade runners, complaints about ships and officers, 286-87 Christmas, 288 Trent affair, 290 Public expectations, recent success, Port Roya,, 291-93 Need ship and public patience, 293 Change of opinion on slavery, 294 Letters, hasty ship departure, 301 Lieutenant, alcohol, 302 Complaints about officers, 302-3 Thomas W. Sherman, 302-4 Gunboats on Beaufort River, bloody skirmish, 304-5 Isaac Tattnall, black pilot, 306 Blacks preparing to leave Savannah, 306 5 Confederate naval commander Tattnall, 308 et passim Letters, 309-10 Trent affair, 310-11 Artist visits ship, 312 Thomas W. Sherman, 313-14 Location of forces around Port Royal, 314-15 Complains that his report on Port Royal has not been published, 315-16 Welles, praises Du Pont, Trent affair, 317-18 Planning future operations, vessels, 320 Details of naval operations that appear in newspapers, 322-23 Religious service, singing, 324 Trent Affair, 325-26 Gunboats at Walls Cut, 328-29 Compensated emancipation, border states, 330 Newspaper reports about Port Royal, 331-32 England and France, Stone fleet, 335 Plantations and slavery, 336-37 Trent affairs, English newspapers, 341-42 Blockade duty, 343-46 St. Andrews Sound, 346 Fernandina, 348-56 Runaway slaves, 350-51 Iron safe filled with railroad bonds, 353 St.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GUSTAVUS V . FOX and the CIVIL WAR by DUANE VANDENBUSCHE 1959 MASTER of ARTS
    GUSTAVUS v_. FOX AND THE CIVIL WAR By DUANE VANDENBUSCHE j ~achelor of Science Northern Michigan College Marquette, Michigan 1959 Submitted to the faculty of the Graduate School of .the Oklahoma State Univ~rsity in partial fulfillment of the requirements - for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS - Aug),Ul t, 1~~0 STATE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY JAN 3 1961 GUSTAVUS V. FOX AND THE CIVIL WAR Thesis Approved: _, ii 458198 PREFACE This study concentrates on the .activities of Gustavus V. Fox, Union Assistant Secretary of the Navy during the Civil War. The. investi- gation considers the role that Fox played in shaping the plans and pol- icies of the Union Navy during that conflict. The obvious fact emerges that_Fox wa; the official of foremost i~po-rt~nce in the Navy Department 'in planning all the major naval opel:'ations undertaken.by that branch of the service d~ring the Civil War. For aid on _this paper I gratefully acknowledge the following: Mr. Alton Juhlin, · Head of the Special Services Department of the University Library, for able help in acquiring needed materials for my study; Dr. Theodore L. Agnew, _wh<J critically read an·d willing assisted ·at all times; . Dr. Norbert R. Mahnken, who brought clarity and style to my subject; Dr. Homer· L. Knight, Head of the Department of History, who generously ad- vhed me in my work and encouraged ·this research effort; and Dr. John J. Beer, who taught me that there i~ more to writing than·putting woras on paper. Finally, I deeply appreciate the assistance of Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War Generals Buried in Spring Grove Cemetery by James Barnett
    Spring Grove Cemetery, once characterized as blending "the elegance of a park with the pensive beauty of a burial-place," is the final resting- place of forty Cincinnatians who were generals during the Civil War. Forty For the Union: Civil War Generals Buried in Spring Grove Cemetery by James Barnett f the forty Civil War generals who are buried in Spring Grove Cemetery, twenty-three had advanced from no military experience whatsoever to attain the highest rank in the Union Army. This remarkable feat underscores the nature of the Northern army that suppressed the rebellion of the Confed- erate states during the years 1861 to 1865. Initially, it was a force of "inspired volunteers" rather than a standing army in the European tradition. Only seven of these forty leaders were graduates of West Point: Jacob Ammen, Joshua H. Bates, Sidney Burbank, Kenner Garrard, Joseph Hooker, Alexander McCook, and Godfrey Weitzel. Four of these seven —Burbank, Garrard, Mc- Cook, and Weitzel —were in the regular army at the outbreak of the war; the other three volunteered when the war started. Only four of the forty generals had ever been in combat before: William H. Lytle, August Moor, and Joseph Hooker served in the Mexican War, and William H. Baldwin fought under Giuseppe Garibaldi in the Italian civil war. This lack of professional soldiers did not come about by chance. When the Constitutional Convention met in Philadelphia in 1787, its delegates, who possessed a vast knowledge of European history, were determined not to create a legal basis for a standing army. The founding fathers believed that the stand- ing armies belonging to royalty were responsible for the endless bloody wars that plagued Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Educator Resource and Activity Guide
    Educator Resource and Activity Guide introduction The Gulf Islands National Seashore is a protected region of barrier islands along the Gulf of Mexico and features historic resources and recreational opportunities spanning a 12-unit park in Florida and Mississippi. The Mississippi section encompasses Cat Island, Petit Bois Island, Horn Island, East and West Ship Islands, and the Davis Bayou area. Barrier islands, long and narrow islands made up of sand deposits created by waves and currents, run parallel to the coast line and serve to protect the coast from erosion. They also provide refuge for wildlife by harboring their habitats. From sandy-white beaches to wildlife sanctuaries, Mississippi’s wilderness shore is a natural and historic treasure. This guide provides an introduction to Ship Island, including important people, places, and events, and also features sample activities for usage in elementary, middle and high school classrooms. about the documentary The Gulf Islands: Mississippi’s Wilderness Shore is a Mississippi Public Broadcasting production showcasing the natural beauty of The Gulf Islands National Seashore Park, specifically the barrier islands in Mississippi – Cat Island, East and West Ship Islands, Horn Island, and Petit Bois Island – and the Davis Bayou area in Ocean Springs. The Gulf Islands National Seashore Park stretches 160 miles from Cat Island to the Okaloosa area near Fort Walton, Florida. The Gulf Islands documentary presents the islands’ history, natural significance, their role to protect Mississippi’s coast from hurricanes and the efforts to further protect and restore them. horn island in mississippi -2- ship island people n THE HISTORY -3- Ship Island, Mississippi has served as a crossroads through 300 years of American history.
    [Show full text]
  • Library Inventory 2014.Xlsx
    Last Updated 1/14/15 Jefferson County Historical Commission Library Inventory Classification Author ‐ Last Name Author ‐ First Name Book Title 976.4 Hoyt Edwin Alamo 358.4 Gregory Barry Airborne Warfare 1918‐1945 917.64 Foster Nancy Haston Alamo and Other Texas Missions to Remember 976.4 Groneman Bill Alamo Defenders 976.4 Groneman Bill Alamo Defenders 976.4 Templeton R. L. Alamo Soldier 976.4 Levy Janey Alamo: A Primary Source 940.3 Hoobler Dorothy Album of World War I 940.54 Jablonski Edward America in the Air War 940.53 Sulzberger C. L. American Heritage Picture 940.54 Sulzbergere C. L. American Hertiage Picture History of WW II 976.4 Watt Tula Townsend American Legion Auxiliary‐Dept. of Texas‐A History 1920‐1940 398.2 Brewer J. Mason American Negro Folklore 913.03 Cohen Daniel Ancient Monuments and How They Were Built 688.728 Godel Howard Antique Toy Trains 581.2 Stutzenbaker Charles Aquatic & Wetland Plants of the Western Gulf Coast 9*30.1 Fradin Dennis B. Archaeology 913 Schmandt‐Besserat Denise Archaeology 930.1 McIntosh Jane Archeology 930.1 Archeology 358.4 Nevin David Architects of Air Power 355.8 Coggins Jack Arms and Equipment of Civil War 355.1 Rosignoli Guido Army Badges & Insignia of World War 2 ‐ Book 1 355.1 Rosignoli Guido Army Badges & Insignia of World War 2 ‐ Book 2 355.1 Mollo Andrew Army Uniforms of World War 2 358.4 Weeks John Assault From the Sky 976.4 Carter Kathryn At the Battle of San Jacinto 911.73 Jackson Kenneth Atlas of American History 912.7 National Geographic Atlas of Natural America 976.4 Emery Emma Wilson Aunt Puss and Others 940.54 B‐17s Over Berlin 976.4 McDonald Archie Back Then: Simple Pleasures 976.4 Sitton Thad Backwoodsmen 973.7 McPherson James Battle Cry of Freedom Last Updated 1/14/15 Jefferson County Historical Commission Library Inventory Classification Author ‐ Last Name Author ‐ First Name Book Title 973.7 McPherson James Battle Cry of Freedom 973.7 McWhiney Grady Battle in the Wilderness 940.54 Goolrick William K.
    [Show full text]
  • Rodgers Family Papers
    Rodgers Family Papers A Finding Aid to the Papers in the Naval Historical Foundation Collection in the Library of Congress Manuscript Division, Library of Congress Washington, D.C. 2011 Contact information: http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.mss/mss.contact Additional search options available at: http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.mss/eadmss.ms011168 LC Online Catalog record: http://lccn.loc.gov/mm70052811 Prepared by Ruth S. Nicholson Collection Summary Title: Rodgers Family Papers Span Dates: 1788-1944 Bulk Dates: (bulk 1820-1930) ID No.: MSS52811 Creator: Rodgers family Extent: 15,500 items ; 60 containers plus 1 oversize ; 20 linear feet Language: Collection material in English Location: Manuscript Division, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. Summary: Rodgers (Rogers) family. Correspondence, journals, drafts of writings and speeches, transcripts of radio broadcasts, book reviews, notes and notebooks, biographical material, and other papers relating chiefly to the naval careers of John Rodgers (1773-1838), John Rodgers (1812-1882), William Ledyard Rodgers (1860-1944), John Augustus Rodgers (1848-1933), and John Rodgers (1881-1926). Includes correspondence of the Hodge family, Matthew Calbraith Perry, Oliver Hazard Perry (1785-1819), and other relatives of the Rodgers family. Selected Search Terms The following terms have been used to index the description of this collection in the Library's online catalog. They are grouped by name of person or organization, by subject or location, and by occupation and listed alphabetically therein. People Agassiz, Louis, 1807-1873. Ammen, Daniel, 1820-1898. Bainbridge, William, 1774-1833. Benson, William Shepherd, 1855-1932. Brooke, John M. (John Mercer), 1826-1906. Buchanan, James, 1791-1868.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vulnerability of the Union War Effort to Naval Attacks at the Beginning of the US Civil War David G. Surdam
    The Vulnerability of the Union War Effort to Naval Attacks at the Beginning of the US Civil War David G. Surdam The Confederate warship Virginia's short-lived triumph in March 1862 triggered a latent fear among some northerners, perhaps exemplified by Secretary of War Edwin Stanton's fit of panic. Upon hearing of the ironclad warship Virginia's successful sortie and apparent invulnerability against a northern fleet anchored in Hampton Roads off the southern Virginia coast, Stanton feared that the ironclad would destroy the remainder of the Union fleet there and scuttle General George McClellan's campaign against Richmond. He further feared that the ironclad would then steam up the Atlantic coast and wreak havoc upon northern ports, and he warned New York officials to block the entrances to the port. Confederate Secretary of the Navy Stephen Mallory hoped for this very result. Virginia's dubious seaworthiness and the Federal warship Monitor squelched Mallory's hopes and allayed Stanton's fears. Prior to Virginia's attack, northern nerves were upset by the Trent incident and the attendant possibility of British naval attacks.1 Virginia's failure to fulfill the Confederacy's hopes should not disguise the unease northerners felt about potential naval attacks. Northerners certainly were familiar with the effects of naval attacks: the War of 1812 was reminder enough. Was the northern war effort vulnerable to naval attacks? Was it important that the Federal navy prevented the nascent Confederate navy or the powerful British navy from attacking northern ports? The vulnerability or invulnerability of the northern war effort to naval attacks has received little attention from historians, possibly because Confederate naval attacks seemed unlikely and because the Trent incident ended quietly.
    [Show full text]
  • “The Wisest Radical of All”: Reelection (September-November, 1864)
    Chapter Thirty-four “The Wisest Radical of All”: Reelection (September-November, 1864) The political tide began turning on August 29 when the Democratic national convention met in Chicago, where Peace Democrats were unwilling to remain in the background. Lincoln had accurately predicted that the delegates “must nominate a Peace Democrat on a war platform, or a War Democrat on a peace platform; and I personally can’t say that I care much which they do.”1 The convention took the latter course, nominating George McClellan for president and adopting a platform which declared the war “four years of failure” and demanded that “immediate efforts be made for a cessation of hostilities, with a view to an ultimate convention of the states, or other peaceable means, to the end that, at the earliest practicable moment, peace may be restored on the basis of the Federal Union of the States.” This “peace plank,” the handiwork of Clement L. Vallandigham, implicitly rejected Lincoln’s Niagara Manifesto; the Democrats would require only union as a condition for peace, whereas the Republicans insisted on union and emancipation. The platform also called for the restoration of “the rights of the States 1 Noah Brooks, Washington, D.C., in Lincoln’s Time, ed. Herbert Mitgang (1895; Chicago: Quadrangle Books, 1971), 164. 3726 Michael Burlingame – Abraham Lincoln: A Life – Vol. 2, Chapter 34 unimpaired,” which implied the preservation of slavery.2 As McClellan’s running mate, the delegates chose Ohio Congressman George Pendleton, a thoroughgoing opponent of the war who had voted against supplies for the army. As the nation waited day after day to see how McClellan would react, Lincoln wittily opined that Little Mac “must be intrenching.” More seriously, he added that the general “doesn’t know yet whether he will accept or decline.
    [Show full text]
  • The Border South and the Secession Crisis, 1859-1861 Michael Dudley Robinson Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2013 Fulcrum of the Union: The Border South and the Secession Crisis, 1859-1861 Michael Dudley Robinson Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Robinson, Michael Dudley, "Fulcrum of the Union: The Border South and the Secession Crisis, 1859-1861" (2013). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 894. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/894 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. FULCRUM OF THE UNION: THE BORDER SOUTH AND THE SECESSION CRISIS, 1859- 1861 A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College In partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of History by Michael Dudley Robinson B.S. North Carolina State University, 2001 M.A. University of North Carolina – Wilmington, 2007 May 2013 For Katherine ii Acknowledgements Throughout the long process of turning a few preliminary thoughts about the secession crisis and the Border South into a finished product, many people have provided assistance, encouragement, and inspiration. The staffs at several libraries and archives helped me to locate items and offered suggestions about collections that otherwise would have gone unnoticed. I would especially like to thank Lucas R.
    [Show full text]
  • “Butler's Rotten Breath of Calumny”: Major General Benjamin F. Butler and the Censure of the Seventh Vermont Infantry Regi
    “Butler’s Rotten Breath of Calumny”: Major General Benjamin F. Butler and the Censure of the Seventh Vermont Infantry Regiment One Vermont officer recalled that when the men disembarked, Butler said “he would rather see 300 barrels of Pork” come ashore than the Seventh Vermont. Another, a sergeant, put the figure at ten barrels. By Jeffrey D. Marshall he Civil War produced both heroes and scoundrels. Benjamin F. Butler (1818–1893), lawyer and politician of Lowell, Massa- T chusetts, and major general of volunteers in the Civil War, emerged as either hero or scoundrel, depending on one’s point of view. His harsh treatment of civilians in New Orleans, where he served as military governor for eight months in 1862, proved as gratifying to righ- teous Northerners as it was bitterly provocative to Southerners. Butler favored certain regiments under his command, including the Eighth Vermont Infantry Regiment, whose men held their general in high es- teem. But to the men of the Seventh Vermont Infantry Regiment, But- ler was a scoundrel of the highest rank. Butler’s censure of the Seventh for its conduct in the battle of Baton Rouge on August 5, 1862, was the ..................... Jeffrey D. Marshall is the University Archivist and Curator of Manuscripts at the University of Vermont Bailey/Howe Library. He edited A War of the People: Vermont Civil War Letters (Hanover: University Press of New England, 1999) and has published several articles and reviews. Vermont History 72 (Winter/Spring 2004): 23–54. © 2004 by the Vermont Historical Society. ISSN: 0042-4161; on-line ISSN: 1544-3043 24 ....................
    [Show full text]
  • Admiral Samuel Francis Du Pont
    Kevin J. Weddle. Lincoln's Tragic Admiral: The Life of Samuel Francis Du Pont. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 2005. 304 pp. $34.95, cloth, ISBN 978-0-8139-2332-1. Reviewed by John Schroeder Published on H-CivWar (May, 2006) Kevin J. Weddle has written an admirable bi‐ Although Weddle describes Du Pont's varied ography of this well-known antebellum American naval duties over a long career, the author argues naval officer. Born in 1803 to a well-connected that "the true significance of Du Pont's naval ca‐ and prominent family, Samuel Francis Du Pont, or reer" was the "tremendous and positive influence Frank as he was known, entered the navy when he exerted on the transformation of the United he was twelve and served for almost ffty years. States Navy structurally, technologically, and Since the naval officer ranks were cluttered in the strategically from the Mexican War through the years after the War of 1812, Du Pont rose slowly. Civil War" (p. 2). As an exceptionally bright, pro‐ He was promoted to lieutenant at age twenty- gressive and respected officer, Du Pont was an in‐ three after eleven years of service. At age forty, he fluential leader of those reform-minded naval of‐ became a commander after twenty-eight years of ficers who wanted to improve the efficiency of the service, and at age ffty-six a captain after forty navy, revamp the promotion system, introduce years of service. new steam and ordnance technologies, and mod‐ Like other officers he received typical peace‐ ernize the nation's naval strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legacy of Commodore David Porter: David Farragut—The Civil War Years Part Two of a Three-Part Series
    The Legacy of Commodore David Porter: David Farragut—The Civil War Years Part Two of a three-part series Vice Admiral Jim Sagerholm, USN (Ret.), October 19, 2020 blueandgrayeducation.org David Farragut | National Portrait Gallery When Virginia seceded from the Union in April 1861, David Farragut proclaimed his continuing allegiance to the Stars and Stripes and moved his family to the North. His birth in Tennessee and the residence of his sisters and brother in New Orleans caused some to question his loyalty. But the Secretary of the Navy, Gideon Welles, liked what he saw in Farragut: “He was attached to no clique, . was as modest and truthful as he was self-reliant and brave . and resorted to none of the petty contrivances common to some . ‘ Thus, when looking for an officer to command the capture of New Orleans, Welles chose Farragut, even though Farragut had no experience commanding more than one vessel. The principal defense for New Orleans from threats via the Gulf were Forts Jackson and St. Philip, located some 40 miles south of the city. It was generally believed that wooden-hulled ships would at best be severely damaged if not sunk in trying to run past the formidable artillery of a fort. Farragut was one of the few who thought otherwise. In addition, his foster brother, Commander David Dixon Porter, proposed assembling a squadron of gunboats, each armed with a 13-inch mortar that could hurl a 200-pound shell 3 miles, claiming that they could reduce the forts sufficiently to permit Farragut’s ships to run past them with minimal damage.
    [Show full text]
  • FIRST YEARS of a LONG WAR: 1861-1862 Northerners at First Expected the War to Last No More Than a Few Weeks
    FIRST YEARS OF A LONG WAR: 1861-1862 Northerners at first expected the war to last no more than a few weeks. Lincoln called up the first volunteers for an enlistment period of only 90 days. It would take 4 years of fighting before northern troops finally marched into the Confederate capital in Richmond, Virginia FIRST BATTLE OF BULL RUN - In the first major battle of the war in July 1861, 30,000 federal troops marched from Washington, D.C., to attack Confederate forces positioned near Bull Run Creek at Manassas Junction, Virginia - Just as the Union forced seemed close to victory, Confederate reinforcements under General Thomas (Stonewall) Jackson counterattacked and sent the inexperienced Union troops in panicky flight back to Washington along with civilians on a picnic - The battle ended the illusion of a short war and also promoted the myth that the Rebels were invincible in battle UNION STRATEGY - General Winfield Scott, veteran of the 1812 and Mexican wars, devised a 3-part strategy for winning a long war: 1. The Anaconda Plan of using the U.S. Navy to blockade southern ports & cut off essential supplies from reaching the South 2. Divide the Confederacy in two by taking control of the Mississippi River 3. Raise and train an army 500,000 strong to take Richmond - As it happened, the first two parts of the strategy were easier to achieve than the 3rd, but each part were important to victory UNION LOSES SEVERAL KEY BATTLES IN VIRGINIA AFTER THEIR LOSS AT BULL RUN PENINSULA CAMPAIGN: General George McClellan, the new commander of the Union army in the East, insisted that his troops be given a long period of training and discipline before going into battle.
    [Show full text]