Deciphering biodiversity and interactions between bacteria and microeukaryotes within epilithic biofilms from the Loue river, France Anouk Zancarini1,+, Isidora Echenique-Subiabre1,2,+, Didier Debroas3,4, Najwa Taïb4, Catherine Quiblier2,5, Jean-François Humbert1,* 1 iEES Paris, UMR UPMC-CNRS-IRD-INRA-Univ. Paris 7-UPEC, Paris, France 2 Unité Molécules de Communication et Adaptation des Microorganismes, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, CNRS, Paris, France 3 Laboratoire “Microorganismes: Génome et Environnement”, Clermont Université, Clermont-Ferrand, France 4 Laboratoire “Microorganismes: Génome et Environnement”, CNRS, Aubière, France 5 Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France *
[email protected] +these authors contributed equally to this work Supplemental Table 1. Statistical analysis results of the effect of both sampling site and date on biofilm composition and diversity indices. Significance of 2-factor ANOVA tests and Tukey tests: ns, *, ** and *** indicate not significant and significant at levels of 0.05, 0.01 and 0.001 respectively. For Tukey tests only significant results were presented in this table for both site and date effects. ANOVA tests Tukey tests df F value P value P value Chl-a Site 3 8.9 0.0005 *** Chamblay-Belmont 0.0007 *** Cleron-Belmont 0.002 ** Date 2 3.0 0.07 ns Site:Date 6 2.8 0.04 * Cyanobacterial biomass Site 3 3.8 0.03 * Parcey-Belmont 0.02 * Date 2 1.6 0.22 ns Site:Date 6 4.5 0.004 ** Diatom biomass Site 3 13.0 0.00004 *** Chamblay_Belmont 0.0007 *** Cleron-Belmont 0.00009 *** Parcey-Chamblay