DOCSLIB.ORG

The Fifth National Report of the Russian Federation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THE FIFTH NATIONAL REPORT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION ON COMPLIANCE WITH THE OBLIGATIONS OF THE JOINT CONVENTION ON THE SAFETY OF SPENT FUEL MANAGEMENT AND THE SAFETY OF RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT Prepared for the sixth Review Meeting in frames of the Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management Moscow 2017 This fifth National Report of the Russian Federation has been drafted in accordance with Article 32 of the Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management. The Report describes in detail the obligations arising from the Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management and compliance with them by the Russian Federation. The Report has been prepared by the State Atomic Energy Corporation Rosatom and the Federal Environmental, Industrial and Nuclear Supervision Service with the involvement of: ● Nuclear Safety Institute of the Russian Academy of Science (IBRAE RAN); ● Federal State-Funded Institution Scientific and Engineering Center for Nuclear and Radiation Safety (FSFI SEC NRS). 2 Table of Contents List of abbreviations ....................................................................................................... 5 Section A. Introduction ................................................................................................... 7 А.1. Purpose of the Report ........................................................................................ 7 A.2. Structure of the Report ....................................................................................... 7 A.3. Conclusions Drawn From the Discussion of the Fourth National Report of the Russian Federation Presented at the Fifth Review Meeting ................................................ 8 A.4. Main Guideline Documents on the Safe Management of SNF and RW and the Introduced Amendments ................................................................................... 10 Section В. Policies and Practices (Article 32) .................................................................. 13 В.1. Policy in the Field of SNF Management .............................................................. 13 В.2. Practices of SNF Management .......................................................................... 13 В.3. Policy in the Field of Radioactive Waste Management ......................................... 15 В.4. Practices of Radioactive Waste Management ..................................................... 16 В.5. Criteria Used for Definition and Classification of Radioactive Wastes .................... 18 Section C. Scope of Application (Article 3) ..................................................................... 21 Section D. Inventories and Lists (Article 32) ................................................................... 22 D.1. SNF Management Facilities (Article 32 (i)) .......................................................... 22 D.2. SNF Inventories (Article 32 (ii)) .......................................................................... 24 D.3. RW Management Facilities (Article 32 (iii)) ......................................................... 24 D.4. RW Inventories (Article 32 (iv)) .......................................................................... 25 D.5. Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities (Article 32 (v)) .......................................... 28 Section E. Legislative and Regulatory System ................................................................ 29 E.1. Implementing Measures (Article 18) ................................................................... 29 E.2. Legislative and Regulatory System (Article 19) ................................................... 29 Е.3. State Regulation of Safety in the Field of Atomic Energy Use (Article 20) .............. 45 Section F. Other General Safety Provisions .................................................................... 57 F.1. Responsibility of the License Holder (Article 21) .................................................. 57 F.2. Human and Financial Resources (Article 22) ....................................................... 60 F.3. Quality Assurance (Article 23) ........................................................................... 64 F.4. Operational Radiation Protection (Article 24) ...................................................... 66 F.5. Emergency Preparedness (Article 25) ................................................................ 68 F.6. Decommissioning (Article 26) ............................................................................ 71 Section G. Safety of Spent Fuel Management ................................................................ 74 G.1. General Safety Requirements (Article 4) ............................................................ 74 3 G.2. Existing Facilities (Article 5) .............................................................................. 82 G.3. Siting of Proposed Facilities (Article 6) ............................................................... 84 G.4. Design and Construction of Facilities (Article 7) .................................................. 87 G.5. Assessment of Safety of Facilities (Article 8)....................................................... 89 G.6. Operation of Facilities (Article 9) ........................................................................ 91 G.7. Disposal of Spent Fuel (Article 10) ..................................................................... 95 Section H. Safety of Radioactive Waste Management ..................................................... 96 H.1. General Safety Requirements (Article 11)........................................................... 96 Н.2. Existing Facilities (Article 12)........................................................................... 102 Н.3. Siting of Proposed Facilities (Article 13) ........................................................... 104 Н.4. Design and Construction of Facilities (Article 14) .............................................. 106 Н.5. Assessment of Safety of Facilities (Article 15) ................................................... 107 Н.6. Operation of facilities (Article 16) ..................................................................... 108 Н.7. Institutional Measures after Closure (Article 17) ................................................ 111 Section I. Transboundary Movement (Article 27) ........................................................... 114 Section J. Disused Sealed Sources (Article 28) ............................................................ 118 Section K. Planned Activities to Improve Safety ............................................................ 119 K.1. Accomplishments of the Russian Federation Pointed Out at the Fifth Review Meeting 119 K.2. Addressing the Challenges Pointed Out at the Fifth Review Meeting .................. 119 K.3. Planned Efforts to Improve Safety (Suggestions) ............................................... 121 K.4. Areas of Good Performance ............................................................................ 122 K.5. Good Practices ............................................................................................... 123 K.6. Suggestions ................................................................................................... 123 K.7. Overview Matrix .............................................................................................. 124 Section L. Annexes .................................................................................................... 127 Annex B1. SNF Management ................................................................................. 127 Annex B2. RW Generation ..................................................................................... 128 Annex E. Framework Normative and Legal Acts ....................................................... 128 4 List of Abbreviations — Atomic Peaceful Large (abbreviation for water-cooled graphite-moderated AMB channel type thermal neutron reactor, operated at Beloyarsk NPP) ASA — acceptable specific activity BE — back-end BN — fast neutron reactor with Na-cooling CMP — joint stock company Chepetsky Mechanical Plant DWIF — deep-well injection facility for liquid radioactive waste EGP — loop-type graphite power reactor EIA — environmental impact assessment — Ministry of the Russian Federation for Civil Defense, Emergencies and EMERCOM Elimination of the Consequence of Natural Disasters FA — fuel assembly FMB — floating maintenance base FMBA of Russia — Federal Medical and Biological Agency FNP — federal norms and rules FR — fuel rod — Federal Target Program Nuclear and Radiation Safety in 2008 and until FTP NRS 2015 — Federal Target Program Nuclear and Radiation Safety in 2016-2020 and FTP NRS-2 until 2030 FZ — Federal law GD — guideline document GRW — gaseous radioactive waste GSP NFCF — General Safety Provisions for Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities HLW — high-level waste IAEA — International Atomic Energy Agency ICRP — International Commission on Radiological Protection ILW — intermediate-level waste — Federal State Unitary Enterprise State Scientific Centre of the Russian Federation —Institute of Physics and Power Engineering named after A.I. IPPE Leipunsky (FSUE SRC IPPE) IRRS — Integrated Regulatory Review Service IRS — ionizing radiation source — Institutional Target Program for the Infrastructure Development and Spent ITP SNF Nuclear Fuel Management
Recommended publications
  • Bfd3bbcbd97066fa41086d0bc3b

    Bfd3bbcbd97066fa41086d0bc3b

    [email protected] www.po-mayak.ru FSUE “Mayak” PA 3 4 FSUE “Mayak” PA www.po-mayak.ru [email protected] Federal State Unitary Enterprise «Mayak» Production Association is the first Russian nuclear industrial site. Present-day PA «Mayak» is an up- to-date and dynamically developing enterprise of the State Atomic Energy Corporation «Rosatom». «Mayak» PA is the leading Russian and one of the biggest world manufacturers of sealed radionuclide sources. The product mix offered today by «Mayak» PA to domestic and foreign customers, includes more than 200 codes of alpha-, beta-, gamma- and neutron sources with various dimensional and radiation specifications, and with reactor isotopes Cobalt-60, Iridium-192, fission isotopes Caesium-137, Americium-241, Plutonium-239, Promethium-147, Strontium-90, etc., as their active material, as well as bulk isotopes with Carbon-14 and Helium-3 gas among them. Ionising sources are widely used for various scientific and technical applications such as radiation processing equipment, oil-well logging, industrial NDT instruments, gamma-radiography, various process control and measurement instruments and other gauges, and also in medicine. At present, acting under the Federal Law dated 11.07.2011, No. 190- FZ, «Mayak» PA accepts for long-term storage and re-processing the disused ionising sources operated in Russia and made both by «Mayak» PA and other manufacturers and Mayak’s origin sources operated outside Russia. At present «Mayak» PA has become an independent player in the market of re-sourcing of radiation facilities and machines. «Mayak» PA offers «from cradle to grave» service package that covers the entire life-cycle of the sources from their manufacture to disposal and allows working directly with organisations operating Mayak’s origin sources.
  • Powered Icebreaker

    Powered Icebreaker

    IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science PAPER • OPEN ACCESS Conceptual design and technical requirements analysis of nuclear- powered icebreaker To cite this article: Hu Yang et al 2021 IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 781 042067 View the article online for updates and enhancements. This content was downloaded from IP address 170.106.33.22 on 24/09/2021 at 20:02 5th International Symposium on Resource Exploration and Environmental Science IOP Publishing IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 781 (2021) 042067 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/781/4/042067 Conceptual design and technical requirements analysis of nuclear-powered icebreaker Hu Yang 1, Jianbo Rao 1 and Chenghua Zhu 2, * 1 Wuhan Institute of Shipbuilding Technology, Wuhan 430000, China 2 Wuhan Second Ship Design and Research Institute, Wuhan 430000, China *Corresponding author e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. As the Arctic’s strategic position has become increasingly prominent, China’s existing icebreaker fleet has been unable to meet the growing demand for polar affairs such as polar scientific research, Arctic shipping, and polar emergency. From the perspective of route planning, the marine environmental conditions faced by nuclear- powered icebreakers have been sorted out. The research status of domestic nuclear power plant, the selection and design of nuclear power propulsion plant and the main technical requirements were put forward. Finally, the overall plan design was carried out from the aspects of general layout, main dimensions, shaft power,
  • Russia's Nuclear Icebreaker Fleet

    Russia's Nuclear Icebreaker Fleet

    Science and Global Security, 14:25–31, 2006 Copyright C Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 0892-9882 print / 1547-7800 online DOI: 10.1080/08929880600620559 Russia’s Nuclear Icebreaker Fleet Oleg Bukharin Garrett Park, MD, USA Nuclear icebreakers remain important for the economic survival of Russia’s Arctic re- gions and are a central element of the Northern Sea Route development strategy.Reactor life extension activities are critical to sustaining the nuclear fleet, as several of the cur- rently operated nuclear icebreakers are reaching the end of design service life. Russia is also finishing a new icebreaker and is planning to build additional nuclear ships within the next 10–15 years. Nuclear icebreaker reactors are fueled with highly-enriched ura- nium (HEU), which has to be reliably protected against theft and diversion. NORTHERN SEA ROUTE Soviet nuclear icebreaker technology was a spinoff of the nuclear submarine program. It was a useful demonstration of the civilian benefits of nuclear propul- sion. It also was seen as an important element of the national strategy to develop Russia’s Arctic regions, a vast stretch of land rich in natural resources. Historically, the development of the Russian Arctic has been closely linked to the development of the Northern Sea Route (in Russian, Severny Morskoi Put’ or Sevmorput’), which was established by the Soviet Union in the 1930s. The route connects Russia’s Atlantic and Pacific ports and has been in regular use since World War II. It is open for navigation from June to November and relies on extensive infrastructure, including the fleet of icebreakers and ice- class cargo ships, aerial reconnaissance, meteorological stations, navigational aids, and port facilities.
  • Atomic Icebreakers of “Taimyr” Type: Propulsion Capacity – 32 MW; Propulsion Capacity – 35 MW; Water Displacement – 19240 T

    Atomic Icebreakers of “Taimyr” Type: Propulsion Capacity – 32 MW; Propulsion Capacity – 35 MW; Water Displacement – 19240 T

    ROSATOMFLOT 2010 Summer-Autumn Transit Voyages Russian Atomic Fleet First Atomic Icebreaker “Lenin” - 03.12.1959 Atomic Icebreakers of “Taimyr” type: Propulsion Capacity – 32 MW; Propulsion Capacity – 35 MW; Water displacement – 19240 t. Water displacement 21000 t; i/b “Taimyr” – 30.06.1989 i/b “Yaygach” – 25.07.1990 Atomic icebreakers of “Arktika” type: Propulsion Capacity – 54 MW; Water displacement – 23000 t; Atomic container carrier i/b “Arktika” – 25.04.1975 “Sevmorput” – 30.12.1988 i/b “Sibir” – 28.12.1978 Propulsion Capacity – 32,5 MW; i/b “Rossia” – 21.12.1985 Water displacement – 61000 t; i/b “Sovetsky Soyuz” – 29.12.1989 Deadweight – 33900 t. i/b “Yamal” – 28.10.1992 i/b “50 Let Pobedy” – 23.03.2007 ROSATOMFLOT The Fleet On-shore Infrastructure 1308 employees 714 employees Atomic Fleet Special Vessels 4 special 6 atomic Decommissioned vessels Decommissioned icebreakers Atomic Container Carrier Sevmorput 4 i/b of Arktika mv Lepse type i/b Lenin mv Volodarsky i/b Sibir 2 i/b of Taimyr type i/b Arktika On-shore works: • base for the atomic icebreaking fleet; Atomic fleet has 16 vessels: • full complex of ship repair; Nuclear powered vessels - 10 • nuclear fuel handling; Atomic icebreakers - 9 • radioactive wastes handling. Atomic container carrier - 1 Special vessels - 6 The summer-autumn period of 2010 was marked by a number shipping operations which involved atomic icebreakers under operation of Rosatomflot. For the first time in the history of shipping a tanker of a 100 000 tons deadweight was piloted along the Northern Sea Route. Tanker SCF-Baltica (Aframax) under the flag of Liberia of 117 000 t deadweight and ice-class Arc 5 loaded 70 thousand tons of gas condensate and left the port of Murmansk (Russia) on 14 August.
  • EURASIA States Continue to Invest in Russian Energy

    EURASIA States Continue to Invest in Russian Energy

    EURASIA States Continue to Invest in Russian Energy OE Watch Commentary: The Arctic LNG 2 project is located on the eastern side of the Gulf of Ob-an extension of the Arctic Kara Sea. It is opposite Novatek’s “Under the terms of the deal, Total buys original Arctic LNG project designed to exploit the vast LNG fields of the Yamal 10% in Arctic LNG 2 and has an option to (Gydan) Peninsula as the accompanying excerpted article from Interfax reports. Total is a major energy giant based in France, while Mitsubishi of Japan, Kogas increase its stake to 15% if Novatek reduces of South Korea, Nuovo of Italy and Saudi Arabia have also been in talks with its participation interest below 60%.” Novatek. End OE Watch Commentary (Grau) Source: “Novatek closes sale of 10% stake in Arctic LNG 2 to Total,” Interfax, 7 March 2019. https://www.interfax.com The Arctic LNG 2 project involves building three LNG trains at 6.6 million tons per annum each, using gravity-based structure (GBS) platforms. [An “LNG train” is a liquefied natural gas plant’s liquefaction and purification facility. In order to transport LNG from one country to another, its volume has to be dramatically reduced. To do this, the gas must be liquefied by refrigeration to less than -161 °C. This refrigeration process is conducted in multiple units arranged sequentially-like a train.] The project is based on the hydrocarbon resources of the Utrennoye field on the Gydan Peninsula. The final investment decision on the project is expected to be made in the second half of 2019, and production at the first train of the plant is scheduled to start in 2023.
  • Russian Arctic Nuclear Development

    Russian Arctic Nuclear Development

    Russia’s plans for Arctic development depend on marine nuclear power Peter Lobner 30 October 2019 1 Rational for marine nuclear power in the Arctic Vessel propulsion was the first Arctic application of marine nuclear power, offering the following useful attributes: Very powerful propulsion plants enable expanded mission capabilities. Without the need for a propulsion air supply, under ice operations became practical. Operations are not restricted by a need to refuel frequently. Long-duration missions can be conducted without support. Non-propulsion applications of marine nuclear power include delivery of electric power, process heat and/or desalinated water to towns, facilities and systems in remote Arctic coastal regions and to off- shore facilities and systems sited on above-water platforms or on the seabed. A large power source is needed to support remote towns and development and operation of large-scale industrial and military facilities and systems. Can minimize the amount of on-shore development needed before power delivery can start from a transportable power plant. Can meet high power demands in the hostile marine environments of Arctic off-shore platforms and the Arctic seabed. Can meet Arctic Council requirements for low carbon emissions in the Arctic. 2 Orientation to the Arctic region 3 Arctic boundary As defined by the US Arctic Research and Policy Act US Arctic Research Commission map, rotated 180 degrees, based on the US Arctic Research and Policy Act of 1984 (Amended 1990). Source: https://www.arctic.gov/maps.html 4 Arctic boundary As defined by the Arctic Council On 11 May 2017, the eight member states of the Arctic Council approved a legally binding agreement entitled, “Agreement on Enhancing International Arctic Scientific Cooperation,” which is intended to ease the movement of scientists, scientific equipment and data sharing across the North.
  • Global Nuclear Markets – Market Arrangements and Service Agreements

    Global Nuclear Markets – Market Arrangements and Service Agreements

    INL/EXT-16-38796 Global Nuclear Markets – Market Arrangements and Service Agreements Brent Dixon Leilani Beard June 2016 The INL is a U.S. Department of Energy National Laboratory operated by Battelle Energy Alliance DISCLAIMER This information was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the U.S. Government. Neither the U.S. Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness, of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. References herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trade mark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the U.S. Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the U.S. Government or any agency thereof. INL/EXT-16-38796 Global Nuclear Markets – Market Arrangements and Service Agreements Brent Dixon Leilani Beard June 2016 Idaho National Laboratory Nuclear Systems Design & Analysis Division Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Policy and Systems Analysis Under U.S. Department of Energy-Idaho Operations Office Contract DE-AC07-05ID14517 Forward The U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Policy and Systems Analysis (EPSA) requested an assessment of global nuclear markets, including the structure of nuclear companies in different countries and the partnerships between reactor vendors and buyers.
  • CONTENTS Back to Contents

    CONTENTS Back to Contents

    NEWSLETTER #8 (244) AUGUST 2021 CONTENTS Back to contents ROSATOM NEWS TRENDS Kudankulam, High Five! Nuclear Technology Saves Lives Arctic Sea Lane ROSATOM GEOGRAPHY Russian Atom Reaches New Heights NEWSLETTER #8 (244) AUGUST 2021 ROSATOM NEWS Back to contents Представители ТВЭЛ, ENUSA, ENSA и IDOM подписывают меморандум we are prepared to launch mass Kudankulam, construction of Russian- designed power units with the state-of-the-art Generation High Five! III+ reactors at other sites in India. This possibility is stipulated in our existing Construction of Kudankulam Unit 5 agreements,” Director General of Rosatom has been officially kicked off. This is Alexey Likhachev said at the ceremony. the third stage of the Indian nuclear project carried out by Rosatom. Kudankulam profile The ceremony of pouring the first concrete for the basemat of Kudankulam Unit 5 The fifth power unit is constructed within located in the same-name town in the Indian the framework of a Russian- Indian treaty state of Tamil Nadu was held on June 29. signed in November 1988 and amended in June 1998. Since then, Rosatom has “The nuclear construction project in constructed and put in operation two power Kudankulam has been a symbol of close units of the Kudankulam Nuclear Power collaboration between Russia and India Plant. The first of them was connected to for many years. But it is not the time to the Indian national power grid in October rest — Rosatom possesses all the most 2013, followed by the other in August 2016. advanced nuclear energy technologies. In The two units have VVER-1000 reactors, the a partnership with our Indian colleagues, most powerful in India.
  • The Russian Northern Fleet Sources of Radioactive Contamination

    The Russian Northern Fleet Sources of Radioactive Contamination

    NO9600025 Bellona Report Volume 2:1996 NEI-NO--726 \ Sources of Radioactive contamination Thomas Nilsen Igor Kudrik Alexandr Nikitin BELLONA V .., I! V: NO9600025 Bellona Report Volume 2:1996 The Russian Northern Fleet Sources of Radioactive contamination Thomas Nilsen Igor Kudrik Alexandr Nikitin 2 C 1 0 1 The publication of this report is sponsored by: Stiftelsen Fritt Ord/Foundation for Freedom of Expression (Main contributor) Contributors: Norsk Hydro a.s. Petrochemicals Division NORSAS, Norwegian Resource Centre for Waste Aker ASA Management and Recycling Chemical Workers Union of Norway Norsk Sivilingeni0rers Forening Norwegian Seafood Export Council Norges ingeni0rorganisasjon (NITO) FESIL AS Green Sea Operations AS Norwegian Society of Engineers UNI STOREBRAND Confederation of Norwegian Business and Industry AGAAS WASA Forsiikring (Stockholm) OZO Hotwater A/S Norwegian Fishermen's Association Energiforsyningens Fellesorganisasjon EnFO Norwegian Federation of Oilworkers' Trade Union Store Norske Spitsbergen Kullkompani AS Norwegian Polar Institute Svalbard Samfunnsdrift AS Odda Smelteverk Norzink AS Published by: The Bellona Foundation Norway: P.O. Box 2141, Griinerl0kka N-0505 OSLO, Norway. E-mail: [email protected] Russia: Brussels: USA Russia Bellona Europa Bellona USA 183038 Murmansk 142-144 Avenue de Tervueren 310 D Street NE P.O. Box 4310 B-1150Bruxelles Washington, DC 20002 Bellona Russia Belgium USA E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] URL: Photos: Copying permitted when source is http://www.grida.no/ngo/bellona/ John Berg (archive), Thorbj0rn Bj0r- stated. kli, Per Stale Bugjerde, Nils B0hmer, ISBN 82-993138-5-6 The Norwegian Defence, Frederic Comments to this report are welco- ISSN 0806-3451 Hauge, Aleksej Klimov, Igor Kudrik, med.
  • Nuclear Reactors in Arctic Russia

    Nuclear Reactors in Arctic Russia

    NUCLEAR REACTORS IN ARCTIC RUSSIA Scenario 2035 The nuclearification of Russian Arctic territories is by Moscow given highest priority for development in shipping, infrastructure and exploration of natural resources. Additionally, the number of navy military reactors in the north will increase substantially over the next 15 years. This scenario paper gives an overview of the situation. The paper is part of the Barents Observer’s analytical popular science studies on developments in the Euro-Arctic Region. Thomas Nilsen June 2019 June 2019 The Barents Observer – Nuclear Reactors in Northern Russia, June 2019 1 June 2019 Published by: The Independent Barents Observer Address: Storgata 5, 9900 Kirkenes, Norway E-mail: [email protected] thebarentsobserver.com (English, Russian and Chinese versions of the news-portal) Twitter @BarentsNews Instagram: @BarentsObserver Facebook.com/BarentsObserver/ Author: Thomas Nilsen, E-mail: [email protected] Twitter: @NilsenThomas Photos and illustrations: Rosatom, Rosatomflot, Thomas Nilsen, Oleg Kuleshov, H I Sutton, Atle Staalesen, Alexey Mkrtchyan, Wikimedia Commons. Keywords: Nuclear, Reactors, Icebreakers, Submarines, Northern Fleet, Russia, Arctic, Northern Sea Route, Nuclear Power, Kola Peninsula, Siberia, Arkhangelsk, Severodvinsk, Severomorsk, Murmansk, Pevek, Barents Sea, Kara Sea, White Sea. This publication is financially supported with a grant from the Norwegian Government’s Nuclear Action Plan administrated by the Norwegian Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority. (www.dsa.no/en/). The Barents Observer – Nuclear Reactors in Northern Russia, June 2019 2 June 2019 Introduction At the peak of the Cold War some 150 nuclear-powered submarines were based on the Barents Sea coast of the Kola Peninsula. Many ships were transporting and storing nuclear waste and at shipyards and bases, spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste was accumulated.
  • Rosatom: Continuous Nuclear Contamination of the Area Around the Mayak Complex

    Rosatom: Continuous Nuclear Contamination of the Area Around the Mayak Complex

    Greenpeace Justice for Section International People and Planet Case Studies Rosatom: Continuous nuclear contamination of the area around the Mayak complex Russian nuclear corporation Rosatom has been Company activity responsible for a series of nuclear accidents at its Nuclear power and power engineering assets, as well Mayak complex, and victims have been unable to as nuclear power plant (NPP) and facilities of full nuclear secure either justice or remedy in part due to the fuel cycle design and construction.5 Rosatom is also impunity of the state-owned company in Russian responsible for part of the military nuclear activities of courts. Russia, including in Mayak. The company has a range of other businesses, including power generation in its Problem Analysis existing nuclear plants; it has a renewable division with increasing investments in wind; and it has uranium mining The Kyshtym nuclear disaster, caused by the Mayak and nuclear weapon development, amongst others. nuclear complex, was the third worst nuclear disaster in history. Despite this the Mayak nuclear complex, whose Country and location in which core business is reprocessing spent nuclear fuel, remains in the violation occurred operation. Local residents are affected both by the historical contamination and by the emissions from current activities. Ozyorsk, Chelyabinsk Oblast, the Southern Urals region, Today Mayak is run by Rosatom, Russia’s state nuclear Russia corporation. This case illustrates how the Russian state and its flagship company work closely together to continue their Summary of the case operations, despite the negative impacts on both public Rosatom’s Mayak Combine is part of the Russian state health and the environment.
  • Mayak" Plant: Case History and the First Version of a Computer Simulator

    Mayak" Plant: Case History and the First Version of a Computer Simulator

    LBL-36212 RAC-1 The Cascade of Reservoirs of the "Mayak" Plant: Case History and the First Version of a Computer Simulator M.V. Mironenko, M.Yu. Spasennykh, V.B. Polyakov, S. Ivanitskii, A.V. Garanin, A.G. Volosov, and I.L. Khodakovsky, Vernadsky Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia A.B. Smirnov, G.Yu. Mokrov, Y.G. Glagolenko, and Eu.G. Drozhko Production Association "Mayak," Ministry of Atomic Energy, Chelyabinsk-65, Russia July 1994 Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory University of California Berkeley, California 94720 t~» This work was supponed by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Management, Office of Technology Development, and the Office of Energy Research, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under Contract No. DE-AC03-76SF00O98. DISTRIBUTION OF THIS DOCUMENT IS UNLIMITED T ABSTRACT The improvement of the ecological conditions at waste storing reservoirs is an important task of the restoration activity at Production Association (PA) "Mayak" (South Urals). The radionuclides, mostly ^Sr, 137Cs, and chemical pollutants deposited in the reservoir water and in the bottom sediment are very dangerous sources for the contamination of Techa River below the reservoirs and the contamination of groundwater in the suirounding formations. The spreading of radioactive contaminants has both hydrogeological and the chemical features. The thermodynamic approach used to account for physical-chemical interactions between water and the bed rocks based on Gibbs free energy minimization of multicomponent system (H-O-Ca-Mg-K-Na-S-Cl-C-Sr) permitted to calculate the corresponding ionic and complex species existing in the solutions, and to characterize the processes of precipitation and dissolution.