DOCSLIB.ORG

Shaping Scotland's Parliament

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Shaping Scotland's Parliament Report of the Consultative Steering Group on the Scottish Parliament 'Shaping Scotland's Parliament' Presented to the Secretary of State for Scotland December 1998 Publisher The Scottish Office More information on the Consultative Steering Group is available on The Scottish Office Devolution website http://www.scottish-devolution.org.uk CONTENTS Foreword by Mr Henry McLeish MP, Scottish Office Minister of State responsible for Home Affairs, Devolution and Local Government Membership and Remit of the Consultative Steering Group 1. Introduction 2. The Key Principles: putting them into practice 3. Detailed Recommendations 3.1. The Standing Orders for the Scottish Parliament 3.2. Members, Offices and Bodies of the Parliament 3.3. Parliamentary Business 3.4. Accountability 3.5. The Legislative Process 3.6. Access and Information Next Steps Annexes A. Remits and membership of Expert Panels and Working Groups B. Research C. CSG Consultation paper D. Analysis of written responses to CSG E. Summary of points raised in open forums F. Draft information strategy for the Scottish Parliament G. Consultation mechanisms H. Mainstreaming Equal Opportunities I. Financial Issues Advisory Group: Summary of Recommendations J. Expert Panel on Information and Communications Technologies: Sub-Group on Democratic Participation: Summary of Recommendations Glossary of terms ________________________________________ The information contained on this WWW site is Crown Copyright but may be reproduced without formal permission or charge for personal or in-house use. © 1998 FOREWORD By CSG Chairman, Mr Henry McLeish MP, Scottish Office Minister of State, responsible for Home Affairs, Devolution and Local Government. To the Secretary of State for Scotland, It gives me tremendous satisfaction to present to you the Report of the Consultative Steering Group on the Scottish Parliament. On behalf of the members of the Group I should like to thank you for giving us the opportunity to be involved in the challenge of drawing up detailed proposals on how the Scottish Parliament should operate. Our deliberations have been wide-ranging. We have consulted widely with interested bodies and individuals and we have been supported by expert advice from various panels established to aid our considerations. In all our deliberations we have been struck by the degree of consensus that exists. In particular, that the establishment of the Scottish Parliament offers the opportunity to put in place a new sort of democracy in Scotland, closer to the Scottish people and more in tune with Scottish needs. People in Scotland have high hopes for their Parliament, and in developing our proposals we have been keen to ensure that these hopes will be met. In particular our recommendations envisage an open, accessible Parliament; a Parliament where power is shared with the people; where people are encouraged to participate in the policy making process which affects all our lives; an accountable, visible Parliament; and a Parliament which promotes equal opportunities for all. I have been fortunate to chair a Group which has been open in its work and has striven throughout its deliberations to achieve consensus. I particularly welcome the constructive approaches taken by the representatives of the other main political parties in Scotland. This has allowed us to deliver a set of recommendations for a Parliament to which Scottish people can relate and in which they can take pride. The work of this Group has set the tone for the future of Scottish politics. I would like to thank the members of the Group for the enthusiasm and commitment they have brought to this task. My thanks also go to the Scottish Office team who formed the Secretariat for their diligent work throughout the last 12 months. We hope that this Report will stand as the blueprint for the manner in which the Scottish Parliament will operate and that it will provide a firm basis for the Standing Orders of the Parliament. CONSULTATIVE STEERING GROUP: MEMBERSHIP AND REMIT Members Mr Henry McLeish MP, Minister of State (Chair) Professor Alice Brown Dr Campbell Christie CBE Mr Andrew Cubie Mr Paul Cullen QC Mr Keith Geddes CBE Mrs Deirdre Hutton CBE Ms Joyce McMillan Mr George Reid Ms Esther Roberton Dr Joan Stringer Mr Jim Wallace QC MP Canon Kenyon Wright Remit To bring together views on and consider the operational needs and working methods of the Scottish Parliament. To develop proposals for the rules of procedure and Standing Orders which the Parliament might be invited to adopt. To prepare a report to the Secretary of State by the end of 1998, to inform the preparation of draft Standing Orders. Scottish Office Secretariat Mr Robert Gordon, Head, Constitution Group Mr John Ewing, Head, Constitutional Policy Division Mr Murray Sinclair, Constitution Group Solicitors Ms Carol McCracken, Head, Constitutional Policy Branch Miss Jane McEwan, Constitutional Policy Branch Ms Deborah Smith, Constitutional Policy Branch SECTION ONE INTRODUCTION 1. The Consultative Steering Group on the Scottish Parliament (CSG) was set up by the Secretary of State for Scotland in November 1997, following the positive outcome of the Scottish devolution referendum, and met for the first time in January 1998. Its membership included representatives of all four major Scottish political parties, as well as of a wide range of civic groups and interests; and our remit was both straightforward and daunting. It was: To bring together views on and consider the operational needs and working methods of the Scottish Parliament. To develop proposals for the rules of procedure and Standing Orders which the Parliament might be invited to adopt. To prepare a report to the Secretary of State by the end of 1998, to inform the preparation of Standing Orders. 2. The Government's White Paper "Scotland's Parliament"1, published in July 1997, had already set out a broad framework for the operation of the new Parliament, drawing on the recommendations of the Scottish Constitutional Convention. It emphasised the Government's expectation that the Parliament would adopt modern methods of working; that it would be accessible, open and responsive to the needs of the public; that participation by organisations and individuals in decision- making would be encouraged; that views and advice from policy specialists would be sought as appropriate; and that Committees would play an important role in the new Parliament, able to initiate legislation, as well as to scrutinise and amend the Scottish Executive's proposals, carry out wide- ranging investigative functions, and meet regularly in locations away from Edinburgh, so as to improve public access to the Parliament's work. 3. The White Paper also stated the Government's wish, within these broad outlines, to leave detailed decisions on how the Scottish Parliament should operate to the Parliament itself. But it was clear from the outset that it would be unreasonable to expect MSPs to begin drawing up Standing Orders - the detailed operating rules of the Parliament - from scratch, immediately after the first elections. Hence the setting up of the CSG, with the task of developing a set of proposals which would be likely to command widespread support, and would provide a clear and well-founded basis for debate when the Parliament itself comes to make final decisions on its procedures and working methods. 4. In preparing its report, the CSG has therefore drawn on a wide range of information and advice: full details of our working methods, and of the results of our consultations, can be found in Annexes A-E. Our work was supported and administered throughout by a team of officials from The Scottish Office Constitution Group, who drafted the vast majority of our working documents and papers. We were advised by the Expert Panels on Procedures and Standing Orders, Financial Issues, and Information and Communications Technologies, and by a Working Group on the Code of Conduct for MSPs; towards the end of the year, an Expert Panel on Media Issues was also set up. 5. In addition, we commissioned research into the working methods of national and regional Parliaments in the European Union and elsewhere. We launched a massive written (and electronic) public consultation exercise, actively inviting views on the working of the Parliament from more than 800 organisations, and placed copies of our papers and minutes on The Scottish Office Devolution Website for open public response. We used targeted focus groups to seek the views of groups often marginalised by consultation processes, including young people and people in urban, rural and remote areas; and we held a series of Open Forum meetings across Scotland, to allow us to hear views at first hand. 6. In presenting this report to the Secretary of State, and to the wider Scottish public, we would therefore like to thank everyone who took part in this consultation process, and in the development of our thinking about the kind of Parliament Scotland will need in the 21st century. The remainder of the report is divided into 3 sections. Section 2 outlines the key principles which we determined should guide our work, and describes how those principles shaped our thinking about the practical operation of the Parliament. Section 3 contains more detailed proposals for procedures and Standing Orders which we believe embody those principles, and would help to give them real force in Scotland's political life. Section 4 outlines how our work will be taken forward. 7. Our aim has been to try to capture, in the nuts and bolts of Parliamentary procedure, some of the high aspirations for a better, more responsive and more truly democratic system of government that have informed the movement for constitutional change in Scotland; and in submitting these proposals for debate, our hope is that the principles on which they have been based will continue to influence the life of Scotland's Parliament, not only in the letter of its Standing Orders, but in the spirit of its work.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Divided We Stand POLITEIA
    Peter Fraser Divided We Stand Scotland a Nation Once Again? POLITEIA A FORUM FOR SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC THINKING POLITEIA A Forum for Social and Economic Thinking Politeia commissions and publishes discussions by specialists about social and economic ideas and policies. It aims to encourage public discussion on the relationship between the state and the people. Its aim is not to influence people to support any given political party, candidates for election, or position in a referendum, but to inform public discussion of policy. The forum is independently funded, and the publications do not express a corporate opinion, but the views of their individual authors. www.politeia.co.uk Divided We Stand Scotland a Nation Once Again? Peter Fraser POLITEIA 2012 First published in 2012 by Politeia 33 Catherine Place London SW1E 6DY Tel. 0207 799 5034 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.politeia.co.uk © Politeia 2012 Essay Series ISBN 978-0-9571872-0-7 Cover design by John Marenbon Printed in Great Britain by: Plan – IT Reprographics Atlas House Cambridge Place Hills Road Cambridge CB2 1NS THE AUTHOR Lord Fraser of Carmyllie QC Lord Fraser of Carmyllie QC was the Conservative Member of Parliament for Angus South (1979-83) and Angus East (1983-87) and served as Solicitor General for Scotland from 1982-88. He became a peer in 1989 and served as Lord Advocate (1989-92), Minister of State at the Scottish Office (1992-95) and the Department of Trade and Industry (1995-97). He was Deputy Leader of the Opposition from 1997-98. His publications include The Holyrood Inquiry, a 2004 report on the Holyrood building project.
    [Show full text]
  • Newcastleton Land Management Plan 2020 - 2030
    Newcastleton Land Management Plan 2020 - 2030 Property Details Property Name: Newcastleton Grid Reference (main NY 5037 8728 Nearest town or Newcastleton forest entrance): locality: Local Authority: Scottish Borders Applicant’s Details Title: Mr Forename: John Surname: Ogilvie Position: Planning Forester Contact Number: 0131 370 5276 Email: [email protected] Address: Forestry and Land Scotland, Selkirk Office, Weavers Court, Forest Mill, Selkirk Postcode: TD7 5NY Owner’s Details (if different from Applicant) Name: Address: 1. I apply for Land Management Plan approval for the property described above and in the enclosed Land Management Plan. 2. I apply for an opinion under the terms of the Forestry (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Scotland) Regulations 2017 for afforestation / deforestation / roads / quarries as detailed in my application. 3. I confirm that the scoping, carried out and documented in the Consultation Record attached, incorporated those stakeholders which the FC agreed must be included. Where it has not been possible to resolve specific issues associated with the plan to the satisfaction of the consultees, this is highlighted in the Consultation Record. 4. I confirm that the proposals contained in this plan comply with the UK Forestry Standard. 5. I undertake to obtain any permissions necessary for the implementation of the approved Plan. Signed, Signed, Regional Manager Conservator FLS Region South SF Conservancy South Date Date of Approval Date Approval Ends 2 | Newcastleton LMP | John Ogilvie | February
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Schools in Scotland: an OECD Perspective
    Improving Schools in Scotland: An OECD Perspective Improving Schools For the past decade, Scotland has been putting in place an ambitious reform called the “Curriculum for Excellence”. Its holistic approach includes Broad General Education from ages 3 to 15 years and this has in Scotland: been put into the spotlight of an OECD review by a team that included leading international experts Andy Hargreaves and Helen Timperley. The report, with twelve key recommendations, will be of interest to those who shape schools and curricula well beyond Scotland. It brings together wide-ranging international and Scottish data to understand how well quality and equity are being achieved in Scotland’s schools. Its analysis An OECD and examples from other countries address how such an ambitious reform can reach its full potential through demanding 21st century approaches to enhancing quality and equity, governance and decision-making, teaching and leadership, and evaluation and assessment. Perspective Contents Overview Chapter 1: Scotland’s “Curriculum for Excellence”: Context and Structure Chapter 2: Quality and Equity in Scottish Schools Chapter 3: Decision-making and Governance for the “Curriculum for Excellence” Chapter 4: Schooling, Teachers and Leadership Chapter 5: Assessment, Evaluation and the “Curriculum for Excellence”. Write to us Policy Advice and Implementation Division Directorate for Education and Skills - OECD 2, rue André Pascal - 75775 Paris Cedex 16 - FRANCE [email protected] Find us at: www.oecd.org/edu/policyadvice.htm Education and Skills data on GPS: www.gpseducation.oecd.org Improving Schools in Scotland: An OECD Perspective This work is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD.
    [Show full text]
  • Administrative Justice and Tribunals Council Annual Report 2010-2011
    Administrative Justice & Tribunals Council ANNUAL REPORT 2010/2011 Administrative Justice & Tribunals Council ANNUAL REPORT 2010/2011 This Report is made to the Lord Chancellor, the Scottish Ministers and the Welsh Ministers Presented to Parliament pursuant to Schedule 7, paragraph 21 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 Presented to the Scottish Parliament by the Scottish Ministers in accordance with Schedule 7, paragraph 21 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 Presented to the National Assembly for Wales by the Welsh Ministers in accordance with Schedule 7, paragraph 21 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 The AJTC’s Scottish and Welsh Committees publish their own annual reports which are laid before the Scottish Parliament and the National Assembly for Wales by the Scottish and Welsh Ministers respectively. SG/2011/192 November 2011 © Crown copyright 2011 You may re-use this information (excluding logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ or e-mail: [email protected]. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at Administrative Justice & Tribunals Council, 81 Chancery Lane, London, WC2A 1QB. This document is only available from our website at www..justice.gov.uk/ajtc The Administrative Justice and Tribunals Council Richard Thomas CBE, LLD - Chairman Richard Henderson CB, WS - Chairman of the Scottish Committee Professor
    [Show full text]
  • Excess Mortality in Scotland and Glasgow
    Excess mortality in Scotland and Glasgow New research, published by the Glasgow Centre for Population Health and NHS Health Scotland, in collaboration with the University of the West of Scotland and University College London, has identified the most likely underlying causes of Scotland’s and Glasgow’s levels of ‘excess’ mortality. This document summarises a series of commonly asked questions regarding this research. Why is mortality higher in Scotland and Glasgow than in other parts of the UK? A huge part of this explanation relates to higher levels of poverty and deprivation experienced by the Scottish population. The links between poverty and poor health are profound and extremely well evidenced. In Glasgow’s case, the city has higher levels of deprivation than any other Scottish city, and also has higher levels of deprivation than most other UK cities. At the same time, however, mortality is higher in Scotland compared with England & Wales, even when differences in deprivation have been taken into account. In Glasgow, mortality is much higher than would be expected for such levels of deprivation, and much higher than in similar post-industrial UK cities such as Liverpool and Manchester, which have comparable levels of poverty. There is, therefore, an ‘excess’ level of mortality in Scotland and Glasgow, defined as higher mortality compared with elsewhere in Britain over and above that explained by socioeconomic deprivation. In Scotland as a whole, this accounts for an additional 5,000 deaths every single year. So what are the so-called ‘Scottish effect’ and ‘Glasgow effect’? These terms were originally coined to describe the excess levels of mortality in Scotland, as described above.
    [Show full text]
  • Gendering Processes of Institutional Design: Activists at the Negotiating Table
    The University of Manchester Research Gendering processes of institutional design: Activists at the negotiating table DOI: 10.1080/14616742.2014.918777 Link to publication record in Manchester Research Explorer Citation for published version (APA): McLeod, L., Johnson, R., Meintjes, S., Brown, A., & Oosterveld, V. (2014). Gendering processes of institutional design: Activists at the negotiating table. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 16(2), 354-369. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2014.918777 Published in: International Feminist Journal of Politics Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on Manchester Research Explorer is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Proof version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Explorer are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Takedown policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please refer to the University of Manchester’s Takedown Procedures [http://man.ac.uk/04Y6Bo] or contact [email protected] providing relevant details, so we can investigate your claim. Download date:04. Oct. 2021 PRE-PROOFS NON-PUBLISHERS PDF VERSION OF ‘GENDERING PROCESSES OF INSTITUTIONAL DESIGN: ACTIVISTS AT THE NEGOTIATING
    [Show full text]
  • Scotland and the UK Constitution
    Scotland and the UK Constitution The 1998 devolution acts brought about the most significant change in the constitution of the United Kingdom since at least the passage of the 1972 European Communities Act. Under those statutes devolved legislatures and administrations were created in Wales, Northern Ireland, and Scotland. The documents below have been selected to give an overview of the constitutional settlement established by the devolution acts and by the Courts. Scotland has been chosen as a case study for this examination, both because the Scottish Parliament has been granted the most extensive range of powers and legislative competences of the three devolved areas, but also because the ongoing debate on Scottish independence means that the powers and competencies of the Scottish Parliament are very much live questions. The devolution of certain legislative and political powers to Scotland was effected by the Scotland Act 1998. That statute, enacted by the Westminster Parliament, creates the Scottish Parliament and the Scottish Executive (now the “Scottish Government”), and establishes the limits on the Parliament’s legislative competence. Schedule 5 of the Act, interpolated by Section 30(1), lists those powers which are reserved to the Westminster Parliament, and delegates all other matters to the devolved organs. Thus, while constitutional matters, foreign affairs, and national defence are explicitly reserved to Westminster, all matters not listed— including the education system, the health service, the legal system, environmental
    [Show full text]
  • Stewart2019.Pdf
    Political Change and Scottish Nationalism in Dundee 1973-2012 Thomas A W Stewart PhD Thesis University of Edinburgh 2019 Abstract Prior to the 2014 independence referendum, the Scottish National Party’s strongest bastions of support were in rural areas. The sole exception was Dundee, where it has consistently enjoyed levels of support well ahead of the national average, first replacing the Conservatives as the city’s second party in the 1970s before overcoming Labour to become its leading force in the 2000s. Through this period it achieved Westminster representation between 1974 and 1987, and again since 2005, and had won both of its Scottish Parliamentary seats by 2007. This performance has been completely unmatched in any of the country’s other cities. Using a mixture of archival research, oral history interviews, the local press and memoires, this thesis seeks to explain the party’s record of success in Dundee. It will assess the extent to which the character of the city itself, its economy, demography, geography, history, and local media landscape, made Dundee especially prone to Nationalist politics. It will then address the more fundamental importance of the interaction of local political forces that were independent of the city’s nature through an examination of the ability of party machines, key individuals and political strategies to shape the city’s electoral landscape. The local SNP and its main rival throughout the period, the Labour Party, will be analysed in particular detail. The thesis will also take time to delve into the histories of the Conservatives, Liberals and Radical Left within the city and their influence on the fortunes of the SNP.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Report
    MEETING OF THE PARLIAMENT Wednesday 12 December 2012 Session 4 © Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body Information on the Scottish Parliament’s copyright policy can be found on the website - www.scottish.parliament.uk or by contacting Public Information on 0131 348 5000 Wednesday 12 December 2012 CONTENTS Col. PRESIDING OFFICER’S RULING ................................................................................................................... 14631 PORTFOLIO QUESTION TIME ....................................................................................................................... 14632 JUSTICE AND THE LAW OFFICERS ............................................................................................................... 14632 Prisoners (Father and Child Visit Contracts) ........................................................................................ 14632 Gun Crime ............................................................................................................................................ 14633 Community Service Orders .................................................................................................................. 14635 Air Weapons (Licensing Consultation) ................................................................................................. 14636 Fiscal Direct Penalties (Non-payment) ................................................................................................. 14637 “Shaping Scotland’s Court Service” (Ayr Sheriff Court)
    [Show full text]
  • KTP Innovation Showcase
    KTP Innovation Showcase www.ktpscotland.org.uk Our vision for making Scotland a world- The Scottish Government will continue leading entrepreneurial and innovative to foster this culture of innovation Knowledge Transfer nation is set out in the Scotland CAN DO and knowledge exchange across the framework. country. I applaud the hard work and endeavour of all those involved in KTP A key aim of the recently published as the programme celebrates its 40th Partnerships in Scotland Scotland’s Economic Strategy is to anniversary this year. The commitment improve the links between our universities and enthusiasm by KTP Associates, KTP and private sector companies. Centres and Advisers, business and Knowledge Transfer Knowledge Transfer Partnerships academics involved are exemplar and a (KTP) has a strong history of success in Knowledge Transfer Partnerships (KTP) real testament to the performance of our Partnerships is Europe’s Scotland. facilitate these connections via a transfer projects in line with our ethos of Scotland of knowledge through projects carried CAN DO. leading knowledge The diversity of the Scottish business is out by the very best graduates, under transfer programme. It reflected in the variety of KTP projects that joint supervision from a company and an I hope that you all enjoy this year’s are funded every year. At any one time academic institution. Innovation Showcase event. helps businesses and there are upwards of 100 projects running across Scotland. Each one is a true long Innovation is a fundamental Today’s Innovation Showcase not only organisations to improve term collaboration between a business demonstrates the already successful their competitiveness, and an academic institution.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter to the Convener of 10 November 2020
    Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service Crown Office, 25 Chambers Street, Edinburgh, EH1 1LA RNID Typetalk prefix: 18001 Linda Fabiani MSP c/o Clerk to the Committee DX: 540310 Edinburgh 38 Room T1.03 The Scottish Parliament Your ref: Edinburgh Our ref: KD/GS/ ED19004183 EH99 1SP 10 November 2020 Dear Ms Fabiani Committee on the Scottish Government Handling of Harassment Complaints Request for information from the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service I refer to your letter dated 5 November 2020 to the Lord Advocate in your capacity as Convener of the Scottish Parliament’s Committee on Scottish Government Handling of Harassment Complaints. In your letter you advise that the Committee considers that there may be material held by the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS) in the context of the criminal investigation and prosecution of Alex Salmond which is relevant to the Committee’s remit and request that all such information held by COPFS is provided to the Committee. Neither the Lord Advocate nor the Solicitor General for Scotland has had any personal involvement in the criminal investigation of, or the criminal proceedings against, Alex Salmond. The Lord Advocate has accordingly asked me to reply to your letter on his behalf. The material that COPFS holds in relation to the criminal investigation and prosecution of Alex Salmond, as in any case, was obtained and is held for that sole purpose. As a data controller, any processing or disclosure of that material must be lawful, which means that there must be a legal basis for that processing. If COPFS were to process data without such a legal basis, it would be in breach of both its responsibilities as data controller and the legal rights of those who own the data which the Service holds for that purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • The Scottish Bar: the Evolution of the Faculty of Advocates in Its Historical Setting, 28 La
    Louisiana Law Review Volume 28 | Number 2 February 1968 The cottS ish Bar: The volutE ion of the Faculty of Advocates in Its Historical Setting Nan Wilson Repository Citation Nan Wilson, The Scottish Bar: The Evolution of the Faculty of Advocates in Its Historical Setting, 28 La. L. Rev. (1968) Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/lalrev/vol28/iss2/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at LSU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Louisiana Law Review by an authorized editor of LSU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE SCOTTISH BAR: THE EVOLUTION OF THE FACULTY OF ADVOCATES IN ITS HISTORICAL SOCIAL SETTING Nan Wilson* Although the expression "advocate" is used in early Scottish statutes such as the Act of 1424, c. 45, which provided for legal aid to the indigent, the Faculty of Advocates as such dates from 1532 when the Court of Session was constituted as a College of Justice. Before this time, though friends of litigants could appear as unpaid amateurs, there had, of course, been professional lawyers, lay and ecclesiastical, variously described as "fore- speakers," procurators and prolocutors. The functions of advo- cate and solicitor had not yet been differentiated, though the notary had been for historical reasons. The law teacher was then essentially an ecclesiastic. As early as 1455, a distinctive costume (a green tabard) for pleaders was prescribed by Act of Parliament.' Between 1496 and 1501, at least a dozen pleaders can be identified as in extensive practice before the highest courts, and procurators appeared regularly in the Sheriff Courts.2 The position of notary also flourished in Scotland as on the Continent, though from 1469 the King asserted the exclusive right to appoint candidates for that branch of legal practice.
    [Show full text]