DOCSLIB.ORG

(Riverland Pipeline – Pl6) Environmental Impact

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(Riverland Pipeline – Pl6) Environmental Impact ANGASTON TO BERRI TRANSMISSION PIPELINE AND MURRAY BRIDGE LATERAL PIPELINE (RIVERLAND PIPELINE – PL6) ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT December 2003 Riverland Natural Gas Tranmission Pipeline Environmental Impact Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................6 1.1 Background.................................................................................................................................6 1.2 Regulatory Framework..............................................................................................................6 1.3 Purpose of Document .................................................................................................................6 2.0 RIVERLAND PIPELINE SYSTEM .................................................................9 2.1 System Description .....................................................................................................................9 2.2 Operational Activities.................................................................................................................9 2.3 Design Specifications ................................................................................................................10 2.3.1 Design Life .......................................................................................................................10 2.3.2 Operating Pressure...........................................................................................................11 2.3.3 Depth of Burial.................................................................................................................12 2.3.4 Mainline Valves...............................................................................................................12 2.3.5 Pipeline Markers ..............................................................................................................12 3.0 OVERVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL, HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT .......... 15 3.1 Vegetation..................................................................................................................................15 3.2 Soil .............................................................................................................................................18 3.3 Fauna .........................................................................................................................................18 3.4 Water Resources.......................................................................................................................19 3.5 Air Quality ................................................................................................................................20 3.6 Land Use....................................................................................................................................20 3.7 Public Safety..............................................................................................................................21 3.8 Fugitive Noise Emissions..........................................................................................................27 3.9 Waste .........................................................................................................................................27 3.10 Right of Way Clearance...........................................................................................................27 3.11 Aboriginal & European Heritage............................................................................................27 3.12 Security of Supply.....................................................................................................................30 3.13 Easement Restoration & Infrastructure State .......................................................................31 3.14 Health, Safety & Environmental Risk Assessment & Management Plan............................31 4. COMMUNITY CONSULTATION ................................................................ 41 4.1 Landholders/Occupiers............................................................................................................41 Page 2 of 132 Riverland Natural Gas Tranmission Pipeline Environmental Impact Report 4.2 Aboriginal Heritage..................................................................................................................45 4.3 State Heritage............................................................................................................................46 ATTACHMENT A – Extracts from documents prepared by Kinhill prior to construction in 1993....................................................................................................... 48 Physical and Social Aspects .................................................................................................................48 Environmental Associations ................................................................................................................50 Biological Environment........................................................................................................................55 Operational Management of Biological Aspects................................................................................66 Native Fauna.........................................................................................................................................69 Operational Management of Fauna....................................................................................................73 Aboriginal Heritage..............................................................................................................................75 European Heritage ...............................................................................................................................78 Flora.......................................................................................................................................................79 ATTACHMENT B – Environmental Impact Report prepared by Halliburton KBR Pty Ltd84 APPENDIX A.............................................................................................106 APPENDIX B .............................................................................................122 Page 3 of 132 Riverland Natural Gas Tranmission Pipeline Environmental Impact Report Executive Summary Pursuant to Section 99 of the Petroleum Act (SA) 2000, this Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Angaston to Berri and Murray Bridge lateral, natural gas transmission pipelines (referred to as the Riverland Pipeline), details identified environmental impacts, which arise as a result of pipeline operations and maintenance activities. The management of environmental impacts is essential in terms of both the conditions pertaining to Pipeline Licence No. 6 (PL6) and the long-term environmental sustainability along the pipeline route. An extensive consultation process was initiated with landholders, Aboriginal representatives, local government bodies, State Government Departments and other interested stakeholders, to provide a diverse and complete assessment of potential environmental risk associated with the operating and maintenance activities for the Riverland Pipeline. This EIR has identified that there are limited environmental impacts, which may potentially result in environmental harm, in the event that these impacts are not appropriately managed. Long-term pipeline operations and maintenance activities shall endeavour to improve the natural environment through sustainable operations, which include vegetation management, pest plant and animal monitoring and eradication, water resources conservation and heritage management. Operational management of environmental impacts identified within this EIR, should be read in conjunction with operational management protocols as detailed within the Statement of Environmetal Objectives (SEO) for the Riverland Pipeline. Page 4 of 132 Riverland Natural Gas Tranmission Pipeline Environmental Impact Report Page 5 of 132 Riverland Natural Gas Tranmission Pipeline Environmental Impact Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background The South Australian Gas Company (SAGASCO) Limited and Pipelines Authority of South Australia (PASA) jointly commenced construction of natural gas transmission pipeline from Angaston to Berri during 1993. The pipeline was commissioned during November 1994, initially supplying natural gas to the township of Berri, followed by Murray Bridge during January 1995. The Angaston to Berri pipeline and lateral pipeline supplying natural gas to the Murray Bridge Township is referred to as the Riverland Pipeline and is governed by Pipeline Licence 6. The Riverland pipeline also supplies natural gas to the City of Mildura and surrounding townships in Victoria, via the Berri to Mildura transmission pipeline. Epic Energy is currently the principal operator of the Riverland and lateral pipelines on behalf of Origin Energy Asset Management (OEAM) and the pipeline owner, Envestra Limited. As operator of the Riverland Pipeline since 1994, Epic Energy is fully aware of its responsibilities to the community and ensures that its operations and activities and conducted to maintain environmental sustainability and legislative compliance with relevant legislation. 1.2 Regulatory Framework Licensed pipeline operators shall in accordance with their licence conditions, carry out their operations in accordance with an approved Statement
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Peas (Swainsona Species)
    Action Statement Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988 No. 126 Twelve threatened Swainson-peas and Darling- peas (Swainsona species) Description and distribution The genus Swainsona is represented in Victoria by Distribution maps of each species can be found at 18 species, of which all but four are considered to the end of this Action Statement. be threatened in the wild. This Action Statement Habitat addresses 12 threatened (vulnerable or endangered) taxa of Swainsona listed below. Swainsona species are confined to specific Detailed survey and monitoring of all known grassland and woodland habitats found in south- populations was undertaken between September west Victoria, the Mallee, native grasslands of the 1997 and September 1999. The information northern plains, and riverine habitats along the presented in this Action Statement is based on Murray River. results of these surveys which are stored on the Department of Sustainability and Environment Life history and ecology threatened plant population monitoring database, Swainsona species are largely renascent perennials, VROTPop. Of the two remaining threatened resprouting in suitable conditions from a Swainsona species, Swainsona galegifolia already persistent rootstock. This gives individual plants has a published Action Statement, while Swainsona the capacity to persist between years given suitable recta is presumed extinct in Victoria. conditions. Walsh et al. (1996) also comment that Swainsona species are small to medium annuals or Swainsona purpurea can behave as an annual. renascent perennials, with hairy to glabrous, Growth and flowering among most species of pinnate foliage with 3 - 7 linear leaflets, and Swainsona species appears to be stimulated by flowers arranged in racemes (on lateral stalks) available moisture, thus plants are most frequently varying from yellow to red, pink, purple or violet in observable following adequate Spring rainfall.
    [Show full text]
  • Riparian Vegetation of the River Murray COVER: Healthy Red Gum in the Kex)Ndrook State Forest Near Barham N.S.W
    Riparian Vegetation of The River Murray COVER: Healthy red gum in the Kex)ndrook State Forest near Barham N.S.W. Background, black box silhouette. PHOTO: D. Eastburn ISBN 1 R75209 02 6 RIVER MURRAY RIPARIAN VEGET ION STUDY PREPARED FOR: MURRAY-DARLING BASIN COMMISSION BY: MARGULES AND PARTNERS PTY LTD PAND J SMITH ECOLOGICAL CONSULTANTS DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION FORESTS AND LANDS VICTORIA January 1990 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS The River Murray Riparian Vegetation Survey was initiated by the Murray­ Darling Basin Commission t9 assessJhe present status ofthe vegetationalong the Murray, to identify causes ofdegradation, and to develop solutions for its rehabilitation and long term stability. The study area was the floodplain of the Murray River and its anabranches, including the Edward-Wakool system, from below Hume Dam to the upper end of Lake Alexandrina. The components of the study were: · Literature Review A comprehensive bibliography was compiled on the floodplain vegeta­ tion, its environment and the impact ofman's activities. The literature was reviewed and summarised. · Floristic Survey A field survey was carried out, visiting 112 sites throughout the study area and collecting vegetation data from 335 plots. Data collected were the species present, their relative abundance, the condition of the eucalypts, the amount ofeucalypt regeneration and indices ofgrazing pressure. Brief studies were made of the effects of river regulation and salinisation at specific sites. Thirty-seven plant communities were identified from a numerical analyis ofthe floristic survey data. The differences reflect environmental changes both along the river and across the floodplain. The most important factors were identified as soil salinity levels and flooding frequency.
    [Show full text]
  • SDL Offsets in the Lower Murray NSW: Locks 8 and 9 Weir Pool Manipulation Carrs, Capitts and Bunberoo Creeks Connectivity Frenchmans Creek Fish Passage at August 2015
    DISCLAIMER: This is a preliminary business case, used to inform decision-making by the Murray- Darling Basin Ministerial Council and Basin Officials’ Committee on sustainable diversion limit adjustment mechanism projects. The document represents the Business case for SDL offsets in the Lower Murray NSW: Locks 8 and 9 weir pool manipulation Carrs, Capitts and Bunberoo Creeks connectivity Frenchmans Creek fish passage at August 2015. The NSW Department of Industry is currently developing project summary documents that will summarise project details, and will be progressively published on the Department of Industry website. Detailed costings and personal information has been redacted from the original business case to protect privacy and future tenders that will be undertaken to deliver these projects. Business case for SDL offsets in the Lower Murray NSW: Locks 8 and 9 weir pool manipulation Carrs, Capitts and Bunberoo Creeks connectivity Frenchmans Creek fish passage Final business case August 2015 Document review and authorisation Doc. Final/Draft Date Authors Reviewed by Quality check Release approved Issued to Copies Version by 1.0 Draft 30/03/15 1e 2.0 Draft 9/04/15 1e - for distribution to SC members 3.0 Final draft 17/04/15 1e 4.0 Final draft v2 4/06/15 1e Notes: * Ecological Associates ** Alluvium Published by the NSW Department of Primary Industries, DPI Water Business case for SDL offsets in the Lower Murray NSW: Locks 8 and 9 weir pool manipulation. Carrs, Capitts and Bunberoo Creeks connectivity. Frenchmans Creek fish passage. First published August 2015 ISBN number – get this by filling in a request to More information www.dpi.nsw.gov.au Acknowledgments This report has been prepared by RMCG, Alluvium and Ecological Associates.
    [Show full text]
  • Red River Gum CAP Jan 2020
    Conservation Action Plan for River Red Gum parks and reserves managed by Parks Victoria December 2019 Authorised and published by Parks Victoria Level 10, 535 Bourke Street, Melbourne VIC 3000 Copyright © 2019 Parks Victoria. ISBN: 978-0-6483776-0-3 (paperback) For further information Phone: 13 1963 Copies may be downloaded from the Parks Victoria website www.parkweb.vic.gov.au Conservation Action Plan for River Red Gum parks and reserves managed by Parks Victoria December 2019 Disclaimer This plan is prepared without prejudice to any negotiated or litigated outcome of any native title determination applications covering land or waters within the plan’s area. It is acknowledged that any future outcomes of native title determination applications may necessitate amendment of this plan; and the implementation of this plan may require further notifications under the procedures in Division 3 of Part 2 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cwlth). The plan is also prepared without prejudice to any future negotiated outcomes between the Government/s and Traditional Owner Communities. It is acknowledged that such negotiated outcomes may necessitate amendment of this plan. Every effort has been made to ensure that the information in this plan is accurate. Parks Victoria does not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence that may arise from you relying on any information in the publication. Acknowledgements Participants in the River Red Gum Park Landscape Conservation Action Planning process are thanked for their technical input and sharing their local knowledge. Iterations The first iteration of this plan was approved by Parks Victoria in December 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Plants Poisonous to Horses an Australian Field Guide
    Plants Poisonous to Horses An Australian Field Guide HOR - 06-048 Plants Poisonous to1 1 2/06/2006 9:25:44 AM xxxxx HOR - 06-048 Plants Poisonous to2 2 2/06/2006 9:25:44 AM Plants Poisonous to Horses An Australian Field Guide Mellisa Offord RIRDC Publication No 06/048 RIRDC Project No. OFF-1A HOR - 06-048 Plants Poisonous to1 1 2/06/2006 9:25:45 AM Disclaimer by RIRDC Disclaimer by author The information contained in this publication is intended for The information presented in this publication are intended as a general use to assist public knowledge and discussion and to guide to the plants in Australia that are poisonous to horses. All help improve the development of sustainable industries. The care and diligence has been exercised in interpreting published information should not be relied upon for the purpose of a information as the basis for the information presented in this particular matter. Specialist and/or appropriate legal advice book. should be obtained before any action or decision is taken on Specific circumstances and research findings after the date of the basis of any material in this document. The Commonwealth publication may influence the accuracy of the infomation within of Australia, Rural Industries Research and Development this book. The author accepts no responsibility and disclaims Corporation, the authors or contributors do not assume liability any liability for any error, loss or unforeseen consequence that of any kind whatsoever resulting from any person’s use or may arise from relying on, or adopting, any of the information in reliance upon the content of this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Encampment. Here Likewise Grew a Shrubby Species of Xerotes 110H
    - 113 - encampment. Here likewise grew a shrubby species of Xerotes 110h hard rush-like leaves, but allied to X.gracilis.4 Mitchell sketched his quandong-like shrub, naming it Ellsalzarr1-.TsAyana. This plant was long known as Fusanusarsicarius, but in recent revisions, Mitchell t s name has been restored, so that the Quandong is now Eualya acuminata and the Bitter Quandong is E.murrayana. Mitchell thus became -the first explorer, apart from Cunningham, a professional botanist, to name and publish, albeit without the traditional Latin description, a native plant. Also on the Murray, he found a very beautiful, new, shrubby species of cassia, with thin papery pods and...the most brillant yellow blossoms...I would name it C.heteroloba.464 Lindley accepted this, and the plant was so named, although it proved to be synonymous with Cassia eremophila which had precedence. Similarly, Mitchell named Pelargonium rodne anum, which would be an acquisition to our gardens. I named it...in honour of Mrs. Riddell Sydney, grand-daughter of the famous Rodney.4-} On this expedition, Mitchell made his usual prophecies concerning the economy of the new country. He felt that the "quandong nut" and "gum 466 acacia may in time, become articles of commerce" and "having brought home specimens of most of the woods of the interior", Mitchell felt that several of the acacias would be valuable for ornamental work, having a pleasing perfume resembling that of a rose. Some are of a dark colour of various shades, and very compact; others light coloured and resembling in texture, box or lancewood...Specimens of these A pods may be seen at Hallets, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Associated with Remnant Native Vegetation in an Agricultural Floodplain Landscape
    Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Associated with Remnant Native Vegetation in an Agricultural Floodplain Landscape Rhiannon Smith B Nat Res (Hons) University of New England N Meters 0 500 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the University of New England June 2010 Certification I certify that the substance of this thesis has not already been submitted for any degree and is not currently being submitted for any other degree or qualification. I certify that any help received in preparing this thesis and all sources used have been acknowledged in this thesis. Rhiannon Smith i Abstract Biodiversity, ecosystem service provision and human well-being are inextricably linked. The current rate of biodiversity loss worldwide is impacting on ecosystem service provision with negative implications for human well-being. Little quantitative information is available about the provision of most ecosystem services by most ecosystems, the effect of management on the ability of vegetation to provide services, or trade-offs in service provision with land use. This information is particularly important in agricultural landscapes where the extent of landscape change is affecting biodiversity and ecosystem service provision substantially and thus agricultural sustainability. This study quantified the provision of carbon storage, erosion mitigation and biodiversity conservation services by five vegetation communities (river red gum Eucalyptus camaldulensis riparian forests, coolibah E. coolabah woodlands and open- woodlands, myall Acacia pendula tall shrublands and tall open-shrublands, black box E. largiflorens woodland and open-woodland, and mixed grassland – low open-chenopod shrubland) common on the lower Namoi floodplain in northern New South Wales, Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vegetation of Kinchega National Park, Western New South Wales
    1 The vegetation of Kinchega National Park, western New South Wales M.E. Westbrooke, M.K.C. Kerr and J. Leversha Westbrooke, M.E., Kerr, M.K.C. and Leversha, J. (Centre for Environmental Management, University of Ballarat, PO Box 663 Ballarat, Victoria, Australia 3353) 2001. The vegetation of Kinchega National Park, western New South Wales. Cunninghamia 7(1): 1–25. The vegetation of Kinchega National Park (latitude 32°18'–32°40'S and longitude 142°10'–142°25'E) in far western New South Wales was assessed using intensive quadrat sampling and mapped using extensive ground truthing and interpretation of aerial photographs and Landsat Thematic Mapper satellite images. Three hundred and fifty two species of vascular plants were recorded from this survey, which, together with other records indicates the presence of 503 species from 69 families including 100 (20%) exotic species. Fifteen vegetation communities were identified and mapped, the most widespread being Maireana species low open- shrubland, Acacia victoriae open-shrubland and Eucalyptus largiflorens open- woodland. The Park also contains a number of rare or threatened species and vegetation communities. One hundred and fifty years of grazing by introduced herbivores coupled with the impact of a modified hydrological regime has resulted in degradation of many of these communities. Introduction Kinchega National Park (latitude 32°18'–32°40'S and longitude 142°10'–142°25'E) is located in far western New South Wales 110 km south-east of Broken Hill (Fig. 1). The Park covers an area of approximately 44 000 ha. It largely encompasses Lakes Menindee and Cawndilla, which form a major part of the Murray Darling Basin Commission’s Menindee Lakes Storage Scheme.
    [Show full text]
  • Toxicology for Australian Veterinarians
    70 Grazing animals at risk of eating the plant under dry pasture conditions should be either denied access to them or given adequate supplementary feed to reduce the probability of significant browsing of shrubs and trees. Effective mechanical removal of the plant is hindered by its capacity to produce root suckers readily. Picloram + triclopyr (Access) is registered for use on bitterbark as a basal bark or cut stump application using diesel as a carrier. Long-term control of root suckers in fallowed cultivation (> 3 years) is by applying picloram + triclopyr (Grazon DS) as a 1:4 concentration in water using a blanket wiper in autumn. Adding glyphosate provides no advantage. Use 2% Grazon DS (100 ml concentrate in 5 L water) to spot spray individual plants, thoroughly wetting all leaves and stem. Treated areas should not be cultivated for 6 months. These are registered uses of these herbicides. [Osten & McCosker 2002] References: Bisset NG (1958) Annales Bogoriensis 3:151. [cited by Everist 1981] Boaz H, Elderfield RC, Schinker E (1957) J. Am. Pharmaceutical Assoc. 46:510-512. [cited by Everist 1981] CollinsDJ, Culvenor CCJ, Lamberton JA, Loder JW, Price JR (1990) Plants for Medicines. A Chemical and Pharmacological Survey of Plants in the Australian Region. CSIRO Australia, Melbourne. pp.4 Copeland HM, Seddon HR (1931) Poisoning of sheep by quinine bush or bitter bark (Alstonia constricta). Agric. Gaz. N. S. W. 42:925-926. Cribb AB, Cribb JW (1981) Wild Medicine in Australia. Collins, Sydney. p.55-56. Crow WD (1955) Reserpine and Alstonia constricta. Australas. J. Pharm. 36:1402-1404.
    [Show full text]
  • Dubbo Region Flora List 2012
    Flora List of the Dubbo Area and Central Western Slopes Harlequin Mistletoe Lysiana exocarpi subsp. tenuis Drilliwarrina State Conservation Area Janice Hosking for the Dubbo Field Naturalist and Conservation Society Inc Version: June 2012 www.dubbofieldnats.org.au Flora List of the Dubbo Area and Central Western Slopes Janice Hosking for Dubbo Field Nats This list of approximately 1,300 plant species was prepared by Janice Hosking for the Dubbo Field Naturalist & Conservation Society Inc. Many thanks to Steve Lewer and Chris McRae who spent many hours checking and adding to this list. Cover photo: Anne McAlpine, A map of the area subject to this list is provided below. Data Sources: This list has been compiled from the following information: A Flora of the Dubbo District 25 Miles radius around the city (c. 1950s) compiled by George Althofer, assisted by Andy Graham. Gilgandra Native Flora Reserve Plant List Goonoo State Forest Forestry Commission list, supplemented by Mr. P. Althofer. List No.1 (c 1950s) Goonoo State Forest Dubbo Management Area list of Plants List No.2 The Flora of Mt. Arthur Reserve, Wellington NSW A small list for Goonoo State Forest. Author and date unknown Flora List from Cashells Dam Area, Goonoo State Forest (now CCA) – compiled by Steve Lewer (NSW OEH) Oasis Reserve Plant List (Southwest of Dubbo) – compiled by Robert Gibson (NSW OEH) NSW DECCW Wildlife atlas List 2010,Y.E.T.I. List 2010 PlantNet (NSW Botanic Gardens Records) Various species lists for Dubbo District rural properties – compiled by Steve Lewer (NSW OEH) * Denotes an exotic species ** Now considered to be either locally extinct or possibly a misidentification.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Report
    final reportp Project code: B.PAS.0235 Prepared by: Dean Revell, Phil Vercoe, Mike Bennell, Jason Emms, Steve Hughes, Zoey Durmic, Marta Monjardino, Felicity Byrne, Andrew Kotze, Andrew Toovey, John O’Grady, Peter Jessop, Tim Wiley Date published: 5 December 2008 ISBN: 9781741914450 PUBLISHED BY Meat & Livestock Australia Limited Locked Bag 991 NORTH SYDNEY NSW 2059 . Multi-purpose ‘healthy’ grazing systems using perennial shrubs Meat & Livestock Australia acknowledges the matching funds provided by the Australian Government to support the research and development detailed in this publication. This publication is published by Meat & Livestock Australia Limited ABN 39 081 678 364 (MLA). Care is taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this publication. However MLA cannot accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the information or opinions contained in the publication. You should make your own enquiries before making decisions concerning your interests. Reproduction in whole or in part of this publication is prohibited without prior written consent of MLA. Enrich Multi-purpose ‘healthy’ grazing systems using perennial shrubs Final Report November 2008 Sheep grazing mixed forage shrubs at the Badgingarra experimental site (March 2008) Dean Revell, Phil Vercoe, Mike Bennell, Jason Emms, Steve Hughes, Zoey Durmic, Marta Monjardino, Felicity Byrne, Andrew Kotze, Andrew Toovey, John O’Grady, Peter Jessop, Tim Wiley 1 Overarching statement The dry margins of southern Australia’s dryland agricultural regions are at risk of becoming economically and environmentally unsustainable. Prolonged drought and trends towards ongoing change in rainfall patterns are making landuse dominated by cropping and annual pastures unsustainable. This represents an opportunity for large scale change to livestock industries, where blending feed production from woody and herbaceous perennials with traditional pastures become the preferred productive landuse in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Systems Inventory and Project Scoping River Murray Catchment Goyder Institute for Water Research Technical Report Se
    Preliminary systems inventory and project scoping River Murray Catchment Goyder Institute for Water Research Technical Report Series No. 13/9 www.goyderinstitute.org Goyder Institute for Water Research Technical Report Series ISSN: 1839–2725 The Goyder Institute for Water Research is a partnership between the South Australian Government through the Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, CSIRO, Flinders University, the University of Adelaide and the University of South Australia. The Institute will enhance the South Australian Government’s capacity to develop and deliver science–based policy solutions in water management. It brings together the best scientists and researchers across Australia to provide expert and independent scientific advice to inform good government water policy and identify future threats and opportunities to water security. The following Associate organisations contributed to this report: Enquires should be addressed to: Goyder Institute for Water Research Level 1, Torrens Building 220 Victoria Square, Adelaide, SA, 5000 tel: 08–8303 8952 e–mail: [email protected] Citation Kirby M, Bice C, Doody TM, Hemming S, Holland KL, Jolly ID, Mason K, McGinness H, Muller KL, Nicol JM, Pollino CA, Rigney D, Wallace TA, Ye Q. 2013. Preliminary Systems Inventory and Project Scoping River Murray Catchment, Goyder Institute for Water Research Technical Report Series No. 13/9 Copyright © 2013 CSIRO, SARDI, University of Adelaide and Flinders University of South Australia. To the extent permitted by law, all rights are reserved and no part of this publication covered by copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means except with the written permission of CSIRO, SARDI, University of Adelaide and Flinders University of South Australia.
    [Show full text]