DOCSLIB.ORG

S Mars#-Dom/Nr Ted Coast;

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
S Mars#-Dom/Nr Ted Coast; Effect of Hurricane Elena on Florida's marsh- dominated coast: Pasco, Hernando, and Citrus counties Item Type monograph Authors Hine, Albert C.; Evans, Mark W.; Mearns, David L.; Belknap, Daniel P. Publisher University of South Florida, Department of Marine Science Download date 24/09/2021 01:13:47 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/18004 I *+p 4% a EFFECT OF HURR/CRNE El EN4 ON FL OR/DR 'S MARS#-DOM/NR TED COAST;. PRSCO, UEUNRNDO, AND C/7RUSCOUN7/ES EFFECT OF HURRICANE EI;ENA ON FIDRIDA'S MARSH-DOMINATED COAST: PASCO, 7,AND CITRUS COUNTIES Albert C. Hine Mark W. Evans David L. Mearns Daniel F. Belknap* Department of Marine Science University of South Florida St. Petersburg, F'L 33701 *Department of Geological Sciences 110 Boardman Hall University of Maine Orono, ME 04469 Project No. IR-85-14 Grant No. NA85AA-D-SO59 Technical Papers are duplicated in limited quantities for specialized audiences requiring rapid access to information. They are published with limited editing and without formal review by the Florida Sea Grant College Program. Content is the sole responsibility of the author. This paper was developed by the Florida Sea Grant College Program with support frcan NOAA Office of Sea Grant, U.S. Department of Ccmnerce, grant number NA85AA-D-SG059. It was published by the Sea Grant Wension Program which functions as a ccmponent of the Florida Cooperative Extension Service, John T. Woeste, Dean, in conducting Cooperative Ektension work in Agriculture, Hc~neEconanics, and marine Sciences, State of Florida, U-S. Department of Colmnerce, and Boards of County Ccnsnissioners, amperating. Printed and distributed in furtherance of the Acts of Congress of May 8 and June 14, 1914. The Florida Sea Grant College is an Equal mloyment-Affirmative Action employer authorized to provide research, educational information and other services only to individuals and institutions that function without regard to race, color, sex, or national origin. TECHNICAL PAPER NO. 49 March 1987 Price $3.00 EFFECTS OF HURRICANE ELENA ON FLORIDA'S MARSH-DOMINATED, OPEN-MARINE COASTLINE: PASCO, HERNANDO, AND GITRUS COUNTRY COAST ABSTRACT During late August and early September, 1985, Hurricane Elena passed erratically through the Gulf of Mexico, threatening landfall across the west-central Florida coast. This class 3 (maximum winds were 110 knots) hurricane's unusual path caused it to remain approximately stationary about 100 km off the west-central coast of Florida for 36 hours. Eventually, Elena passed off to the west-northwest making 1 andfall along the Mississippi coast. Hurricane Elena caused the largest evacuation in . U.S. history of people from coastal lowlands. This storm also caused widespread property damage and is one of the most expensive storms on record. Hurricane Elena occurred just as a detailed geologic reconnaissance of a three country sector of Florida's open-marine, marsh-dominated coast was completed. Hurricane Elena provided an excel 1ent opportunity to examine the effect of high energy events on this type of coast. The Pasco, Hernando, and Citrus County coast is distinctly different from the sandy barrier island coast to the south which sustained heavier damage from Elena. The marsh coast has a very low regional gradient, low wave energy, low sediment input, and is largely controlled by underlying antecedent, karstified rock topography. Hurricane Elena had very little impact upon the natural and human structures along the marsh coast. There are several reasons for this: (1) the storm never came closer than 81 km to the west central Florida Gulf coast: (2) the dominant winds in the study area were never sustained above hurricane force (74 kts); (3) the dominant winds were alongshore/even slightly offshore; (4) the storm surge peaked at only 2m above MSL; (5) the marsh grasses absorbed wave energy and retarded erosion; (6) much of. the coast has rock exposed or nearly exposed; and (7) there are relatively few people and few buildings/seawalls near the Gul f compared to the sandy coast1 i nes . The observed effects were: (1) some coastal erosion in the southern part of the study area (Bayonet Point, Pasco County); (2) development of small overwash fans penetrating seaward marshes; (3) flattening down of. marsh grasses; (4) redistribution of small, nearshore sand bodies; (5) extensive Juncus wracks in high marsh areas; and (6) breakage of dead mangroves -mdby earl ier freezes). The response of open-marine, marsh coasts to a direct stri ke by a major hurricane is still unknown. Storms like Hurricane Elena have a recurring frequency of 10 years. In the future, the combined effect of a greater sea-level rise with a class 5 hurricane could have much more ,devastating effects. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT ............................. i TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................ ii LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS ........' .............. ii i ... LIST OF TABLES ...........................1 11 INTRODUCTION .............................1 BACKGROUND GEOLOGIC INFORMATION .................. 1 PAST HURRICANE ACTIVITY ......................3 HISTORICAL SHORELINE RESPONSES .................. 9 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF HURRICANE ELENA ........... 9 Storm Formation and Storm Track ............... 9 Wind Circulation. Water Levels. Waves ............ 13 COMPARISON OF HURRICANE ELENA TO HURRICANE KATE ...' ...... 19 EFFECTS OF HURRICANE ELENA .................... 19 CONCLUSIONS ........................... 32 REFERENCES CITED ......................... 33 iii LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Page Figure 1 . Location map of study area ............ 2 Figure 2 . Calculated storm surge curves .......... 4 Figure 3 . Hurricane track lines .............. 6 Figure 4 . Tracks of Hurricanes Agnes and Alma ....... 7 Figure 5 . Fluctuations in water levellspring discharge ... 8 Figure 6 . Tracks of 1985 hurricanes ............ 10 Figure 7 . Detailed track of Elena/wind/pressure data .... 11 Figure 8 . Space image of Elena ............... 14 Figure 9 . Wind distribution map .............. 15 Figure 10. Water level s associated with Elena in studyarea ................. 17 Figure 11 . Peak storm-tide elevation along coast ...... 18 Figure 12. Wave heightlperiod for Elena at Clearwater .... 20 Figure 13A . Detailed track of Kate/wind/pressure data .... 21 Figure 138. Water levels associated with Kate in study area . 22 Figure 14A . Wave heightlperiod for Kate at Clearwater .... 23 Figure 14B . Wave height/period for Kate at Steinhatchee ... 24 Figure 15. Aerial photo of small cuts in marsh/washover ... 27 Figure 16. Aerial photo of new sand spit .......... 27 Figure 17. Aerial photo of Juncus wrack ........... 28 Figure 18. Aerial photo of Juncus wrack ........... 28 Figure 19. Aerial photo of marshisland ........... 29 Figure 20 . Aerial photo of marsh island area ........ 30 Figure 21 . Aerial photo of oyster reef ........... 30 Figure 22 . Comparison of beach profiles ........... 31 LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1 . Hurricanes passing within 120 nautical miles of CrystalRiver ................... 5 Tab1 e 2 . Preliminary best track-Hurricane El ena .........12 Table 3 . Wind data from Withlacoochee Forest Center .......16 Table 4 . Summary of North Atlantic tropical cyclone statistics. 1985 .................25 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this document is to assimilate the basic, physical characteristics of Hurricane Elena, which threatened the west-central coast of Florida in late August/early September of 1985, and to report on the effects that this storm had on the open-marine, marsh-dominated coastline of the Pasco, Hernando, and Citrus Counties. Several reports have already been written concerning Hurricane Elena's effect on the barrier i sland/barrier beach shores (Bal si 11i e, 1985; Bodge and Kriebel , 1985), however, 1 i ttl e has been mentioned concerning this storm's effect on the sand-starved, northern Suncoast. Hurricane Elena appeared in the Gulf of Mexico after the authors had completed a major, detailed reconnaissance of this three county coastal sector (Hine and Be1 knap, 1986). As a resul t, we had a .firm understanding concerning the major depositional processes, geomorphology, and stratigraphy prior to the arrival of Elena. This helped considerably in our assessment of the storm's impact. BACKGROUND GEOLOGIC INFORMATION The northwest Florida coast along the.Gulf of Mexico has been recognized for some time as a unique coastal sector primarily due to its relatively low wave energy and dominance by an open-marine marsh system (Fig. 1) Indeed, many coastal' scientists have -viewed this area as the classic zero energy coast (Price, 1954; Tanner, 1960). Perhaps, as a result of this coastl ine' s outwardly monotonic appearance, its unappetizing appeal to physical ly-oriented sedimentologists, and the strong interest in sandy, barrier i sland coastl ines resul-ting from problems associated with human development the coastal geological community has looked elsewhere for questions to address. As a result, an enormous stretch of the Florida shoreline (32%), and.an important type of coast have been ignored and have remained poorly understood including the effects of storms. Indeed, even to this day, the State's Bureau of Beaches and Shores, an agency charged with shoreline research, feels that this biologically-dominated coast is beyond their purview. Only as the result of a handful of studies by marsh biologists has this coastline avoided escape from scientific inquiry . The recent geologic research along this coast has shown that the morphologic and stratigraphic complexity
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Variations Aperiodic Extreme Sea Level in Cuba Under the Influence
    Extreme non-regular sea level variations in Cuba under the influence of intense tropical cyclones. Item Type Journal Contribution Authors Hernández González, M. Citation Serie Oceanológica, (8). p. 13-24 Publisher Instituto de Oceanología Download date 02/10/2021 16:50:34 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/4053 Serie Oceanológica. No. 8, 2011 ISSN 2072-800x Extreme non-regular sea level variations in Cuba under the influence of intense tropical cyclones. Variaciones aperiódicas extremas del nivel del mar en Cuba bajo la influencia de intensos ciclones tropicales. Marcelino Hernández González* *Institute of Oceanology. Ave. 1ra. No.18406 entre 184 y 186. Flores, Playa, Havana, Cuba. [email protected] ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work was sponsored by the scientific – technical service "Real Time Measurement and Transmission of Information. Development of Operational Oceanographic Products", developed at the Institute of Oceanology. The author wishes to thank Mrs. Martha M. Rivero Fernandez, from the Marine Information Service of the Institute of Oceanology, for her support in the translation of this article. Abstract This paper aimed at analyzing non-regular sea level variations of meteorological origin under the influence of six major tropical cyclones that affected Cuba, from sea level hourly height series in twelve coastal localities. As a result, it was obtained a characterization of the magnitude and timing of extreme sea level variations under the influence of intense tropical cyclones. Resumen El presente trabajo tuvo como objetivo analizar las variaciones aperiódicas del nivel del mar de origen meteorológico bajo la influencia de seis de los principales ciclones tropicales que han afectado a Cuba, a partir de series de alturas horarias del nivel del mar de doce localidades costeras.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerial Rapid Assessment of Hurricane Damages to Northern Gulf Coastal Habitats
    8786 ReportScience Title and the Storms: the USGS Response to the Hurricanes of 2005 Chapter Five: Landscape5 Changes The hurricanes of 2005 greatly changed the landscape of the Gulf Coast. The following articles document the initial damage assessment from coastal Alabama to Texas; the change of 217 mi2 of coastal Louisiana to water after Katrina and Rita; estuarine damage to barrier islands of the central Gulf Coast, especially Dauphin Island, Ala., and the Chandeleur Islands, La.; erosion of beaches of western Louisiana after Rita; and the damages and loss of floodplain forest of the Pearl River Basin. Aerial Rapid Assessment of Hurricane Damages to Northern Gulf Coastal Habitats By Thomas C. Michot, Christopher J. Wells, and Paul C. Chadwick Hurricane Katrina made landfall in southeast Louisiana on August 29, 2005, and Hurricane Rita made landfall in southwest Louisiana on September 24, 2005. Scientists from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) flew aerial surveys to assess damages to natural resources and to lands owned and managed by the U.S. Department of the Interior and other agencies. Flights were made on eight dates from August Introduction 27 through October 4, including one pre-Katrina, three post-Katrina, The USGS National Wetlands and four post-Rita surveys. The Research Center (NWRC) has a geographic area surveyed history of conducting aerial rapid- extended from Galveston, response surveys to assess Tex., to Gulf Shores, hurricane damages along the Ala., and from the Gulf coastal areas of the Gulf of of Mexico shoreline Mexico and Caribbean inland 5–75 mi Sea. Posthurricane (8–121 km).
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing Pier Design Guidance Part 1
    Fishing Pier Design Guidance Part 1: Historical Pier Damage in Florida Ralph R. Clark Florida Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems May 2010 Table of Contents Foreword............................................................................................................................. i Table of Contents ............................................................................................................... ii Chapter 1 – Introduction................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2 – Ocean and Gulf Pier Damages in Florida................................................... 4 Chapter 3 – Three Major Hurricanes of the Late 1970’s............................................... 6 September 23, 1975 – Hurricane Eloise ...................................................................... 6 September 3, 1979 – Hurricane David ........................................................................ 6 September 13, 1979 – Hurricane Frederic.................................................................. 7 Chapter 4 – Two Hurricanes and Four Storms of the 1980’s........................................ 8 June 18, 1982 – No Name Storm.................................................................................. 8 November 21-24, 1984 – Thanksgiving Storm............................................................ 8 August 30-September 1, 1985 – Hurricane Elena ...................................................... 9 October 31,
    [Show full text]
  • PNO-II-85-110:On 851119,Hurricane Kate Centered Slightly Inland Over
    r ' [ , November 19, 1985 PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION OF EVENT OR UNUSUAL OCCURRENCE PN0-II-85-110 This preliminary notification constitutes EARLY notice of events of POSSIBLE safety or public interest significance. The information is as initially received without verifi- cation or evaluation, and is basically all that is known by the Region II staff on this date. FACILITY: Florida Power & Light Company Licensee Emergency Classification: Turkey Point Units 1 & 2 X Notification of Unusual Event Docket No's: 50-250/251 Alert Homestead, Florida Site Area Emergency St. Lucie Units 1 & 2 General Emergency Docket No's: 50-335/389 Not Applicable Ft. Pierce, Florida Florida Power Corporation Crystal River Unit 3 Docket No: 50-302 Crystal River, Florida SUBJECT: ACTIONS IN RESPONSE TO HURRICANE KATE As of 8 a.m. (EST) today, Hurricane Kate was centered near latitude 22.7 north and longitude 80.5 west. This position is slightly inland over north central Cuba, about 150 miles south of Key West, Florida. It is moving westward at near 20 miles per hour. On this course, Kate will continue moving over central and western Cuba before entering the Gulf of Mexico. Hurricane warnings have been lifted over mainland Florida except in the middle and lower keys. Gusts in squalls over portions of the mainland are expected to exceed 50 miles per hour with hurricane force winds being limited to the Florida keys. Both Florida Power & Light Company and Florida Power Corporation have been following the course of the storm and are taking appropriate actions. Both Turkey Point units continue to operate at 100 percent power.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Hurricanes and Tropical Storms
    FLORIDA HURRICANES AND TROPICAL STORMS 1871-1995: An Historical Survey Fred Doehring, Iver W. Duedall, and John M. Williams '+wcCopy~~ I~BN 0-912747-08-0 Florida SeaGrant College is supported by award of the Office of Sea Grant, NationalOceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce,grant number NA 36RG-0070, under provisions of the NationalSea Grant College and Programs Act of 1966. This information is published by the Sea Grant Extension Program which functionsas a coinponentof the Florida Cooperative Extension Service, John T. Woeste, Dean, in conducting Cooperative Extensionwork in Agriculture, Home Economics, and Marine Sciences,State of Florida, U.S. Departmentof Agriculture, U.S. Departmentof Commerce, and Boards of County Commissioners, cooperating.Printed and distributed in furtherance af the Actsof Congressof May 8 andJune 14, 1914.The Florida Sea Grant Collegeis an Equal Opportunity-AffirmativeAction employer authorizedto provide research, educational information and other servicesonly to individuals and institutions that function without regardto race,color, sex, age,handicap or nationalorigin. Coverphoto: Hank Brandli & Rob Downey LOANCOPY ONLY Florida Hurricanes and Tropical Storms 1871-1995: An Historical survey Fred Doehring, Iver W. Duedall, and John M. Williams Division of Marine and Environmental Systems, Florida Institute of Technology Melbourne, FL 32901 Technical Paper - 71 June 1994 $5.00 Copies may be obtained from: Florida Sea Grant College Program University of Florida Building 803 P.O. Box 110409 Gainesville, FL 32611-0409 904-392-2801 II Our friend andcolleague, Fred Doehringpictured below, died on January 5, 1993, before this manuscript was completed. Until his death, Fred had spent the last 18 months painstakingly researchingdata for this book.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 8 Hazard Analysis
    Appendix 8 Hazard Analysis Introduction This appendix includes several components. First is an overall discussion of the Hazard Analysis modeling effort, describing the surge (ADCIRC) and wave (WAM, STWAVE) modeling. That first section is followed by a subsidiary section labeled Appendix 8-1 that defines the many acronyms used in the modeling discussion. This is followed by a major section labeled Appendix 8-2 consisting of the Whitepaper of Donald T. Resio, ERDC-CHL, which forms the basis of the storm statistics and JPM methods discussed in the main body of the report. Owing to its prominence in the discussion, it has, for convenience, been referred to as R2007. Note that R2007, itself, includes several appendices; these are identified as Appendices A-G within Appendix 8-2. Finally, a discussion of the rainfall model is included here as Appendix 8-3. Hazard Analysis The hazard analysis required for the risk assessment was based upon the hurricane modeling conducted by a team of Corps of Engineers, FEMA, NOAA, private sector and academic researchers working toward the definition of a new system for estimating hurricane surges and waves. Following is a discussion of the processes used by this team and the steps taken by the risk team to incorporate the results into the risk analysis. The hurricane hazard definition required as input to the risk analysis involved several steps: 1. Selection of the methodology to be used for estimating surges and waves 2. Determination of hurricane probabilities 3. Production of the ADCIRC grid models for the different HPS configurations. 4. Production of the computer system for development of the large number of hydrographs required by the risk model.
    [Show full text]
  • FLORIDA HAZARDOUS WEATHER by DAY (To 1994) OCTOBER 1 1969
    FLORIDA HAZARDOUS WEATHER BY DAY (to 1994) OCTOBER 1 1969 - 1730 - Clay Co., Orange Park - Lightning killed a construction worker who was working on a bridge. A subtropical storm spawned one weak tornado and several waterspouts in Franklin Co. in the morning. 2 195l - south Florida - The center of a Tropical Storm crossed Florida from near Fort Myers to Vero Beach. Rainfall totals ranged from eight to 13 inches along the track, but no strong winds occurred near the center. The strong winds of 50 to 60 mph were all in squalls along the lower east coast and Keys, causing minor property damage. Greatest damage was from rains that flooded farms and pasture lands over a broad belt extending from Naples, Fort Myers, and Punta Gorda on the west coast to Stuart, Fort Pierce, and Vero Beach on the east. Early fall crops flooded out in rich Okeechobee farming area. Many cattle had to be moved out of flooded area, and quite a few were lost by drowning or starvation. Roadways damaged and several bridges washed out. 2-4 1994 - northwest Florida - Flood/Coastal Flood - The remnants of Tropical Depression 10 moved from the northeast Gulf of Mexico, across the Florida Panhandle, and into Georgia on the 2nd. High winds produced rough seas along west central and northwest Florida coasts causing minor tidal flooding and beach erosion. Eighteen people had to be rescued from sinking boats in the northeast Gulf of Mexico. Heavy rains in the Florida Big Bend and Panhandle accompanied the system causing extensive flooding to roadways, creeks and low lying areas and minor flooding of rivers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Hurricanes on Birds, with Special Reference to Caribbean Islands
    Bird Conservation International (1993) 3:319-349 The effects of hurricanes on birds, with special reference to Caribbean islands JAMES W. WILEY and JOSEPH M. WUNDERLE, JR. Summary Cyclonic storms, variously called typhoons, cyclones, or hurricanes (henceforth, hurricanes), are common in many parts of the world, where their frequent occurrence can have both direct and indirect effects on bird populations. Direct effects of hurricanes include mortality from exposure to hurricane winds, rains, and storm surges, and geo- graphic displacement of individuals by storm winds. Indirect effects become apparent in the storm's aftermath and include loss of food supplies or foraging substrates; loss of nests and nest or roost sites; increased vulnerability to predation; microclimate changes; and increased conflict with humans. The short-term response of bird populations to hurricane damage, before changes in plant succession, includes shifts in diet, foraging sites or habitats, and reproductive changes. Bird populations may show long-term responses to changes in plant succession as second-growth vegetation increases in storm- damaged old-growth forests. The greatest stress of a hurricane to most upland terrestrial bird populations occurs after its passage rather than during its impact. The most important effect of a hurricane is the destruction of vegetation, which secondarily affects wildlife in the storm's after- math. The most vulnerable terrestrial wildlife populations have a diet of nectar, fruit, or seeds; nest, roost, or forage on large old trees; require a closed forest canopy; have special microclimate requirements and/or live in a habitat in which vegetation has a slow recovery rate. Small populations with these traits are at greatest risk to hurricane-induced extinction, particularly if they exist in small isolated habitat fragments.
    [Show full text]
  • ON the PERFORMANCE of BUILDINGS in HURRICANES a STUDY for the SAFFIR-SIMSPON SCALE COMMITTEE by Tim Marshall, P.E
    ON THE PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS IN HURRICANES A STUDY FOR THE SAFFIR-SIMSPON SCALE COMMITTEE by Tim Marshall, P.E. Meteorologist HAAG ENGINEERING CO. October 18, 2009 DRAFT COPY INTRODUCTION Over the past 30 years, the author has surveyed building damage in 30 hurricanes beginning with Hurricane Allen (1980). Many of these hurricanes, the author has experienced firsthand by riding out the storms in hotels, vehicles, or parking garages. Within weeks after each hurricane, ground and sometimes aerial surveys were performed to document the performance of buildings and measure the heights of the storm surge using levels, rods, and benchmarks. Then, the author spent several months in the disaster areas conducting individual inspections to hundreds of structures. To date, the author has amassed tens of thousands of images of hurricane damage to buildings and has written and assembled numerous references with regard to building performance in hurricanes. One thing that is clear is that not all buildings perform the same in a hurricane and that certain types of buildings, or their components, fail at relatively low wind speeds. This is especially true if there are poor attachments at critical connections. Certainly there have been a number of building improvements due to code upgrades in Florida and a few other states, after Hurricane Andrew, which has resulted in better building performance in subsequent hurricanes. In the author’s study of storm surge, it has become obvious there is not a direct relationship between the magnitude of the wind and the height of the storm surge. There are many reasons for this including the size of the hurricane, angle of its attack to the shoreline, coastal topography, bathymetry, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Commission on Hurricane Loss Projection Methodology
    Submitted: November 5, 2018 Revised: January 21, 2019 Revised: February 13, 2019 Revised: March 22, 2019 Revised: April 9, 2019 Revised: July 12, 2019 HurLoss Version 9.0 Florida Commission on Hurricane Loss Projection Methodology 2017 Hurricane Standards Prepared for: Florida Commission on Hurricane Loss Projection Methodology State Board of Administration 1801 Hermitage Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32308 Prepared by: Applied Research Associates, Inc. IntraRisk Division 8537 Six Forks Road, Suite 600 Raleigh, North Carolina 27615 Copyright © 2019 Applied Research Associates, Inc. For Evaluation by the Florida Commission on Hurricane Loss Projection Methodology 1 Applied Research Associates, Inc. April 9, 2019 4 4/9/2019 5:30 PM Florida Commission on Hurricane Loss Projection Methodology Model Identification Name of Hurricane Model: HurLoss Florida Model Hurricane Model Version Identification: 9.0 Interim Hurricane Model Update Version Identification: N/A Hurricane Model Platform Name and Identifications: HurLoss Software Platform Interim Data Update Designation: N/A Name of Modeling Organization: Applied Research Associates, Inc. Street Address: 8537 Six Forks Road, Suite 600 City, State, Zip Code: Raleigh, NC, 27615 Mailing Address, if different from above: N/A Contact Person: Frank Lavelle Phone Number: (919) 582-3350 Fax Number: (919) 582-3401 E-mail Address: [email protected] Date: April 9, 2019 Applied Research Associates, Inc. April 9, 2019 3 4/9/2019 5:30 PM Applied Research Associates, Inc. April 9, 2019 4 4/9/2019 5:30 PM November 5, 2018 Floyd Yager, FCAS Chair, Florida Commission on Hurricane Loss Projection Methodology 1801 Hermitage Boulevard, Suite 100 Tallahassee, FL 32308 Re: ARA Model Submission under the November 1, 2017 Standards Dear Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rapid Intensification and Eyewall Replacement Cycles of Hurricane
    MARCH 2020 F I S C H E R E T A L . 981 The Rapid Intensification and Eyewall Replacement Cycles of Hurricane Irma (2017) MICHAEL S. FISCHER,ROBERT F. ROGERS, AND PAUL D. REASOR NOAA/Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory/Hurricane Research Division, Miami, Florida (Manuscript received 7 June 2019, in final form 17 December 2019) ABSTRACT The initiation of a rapid intensification (RI) event for a tropical cyclone (TC) at major hurricane intensity is a rare event in the North Atlantic basin. This study examined the environmental and vortex-scale processes related to such an RI event observed in Hurricane Irma (2017) using a combination of flight-level and air- borne radar aircraft reconnaissance observations, microwave satellite observations, and model environmental analyses. The onset of RI was linked to an increase in sea surface temperatures and ocean heat content toward levels more commonly associated with North Atlantic RI episodes. Remarkably, Irma’s RI event comprised two rapidly evolving eyewall replacement cycle (ERC) episodes that each completed in less than 12 h. The two ERC events displayed different secondary eyewall formation (SEF) mechanisms and vortex evo- lutions. During the first SEF event, a secondary maximum in ascent and tangential wind was observed at the leading edge of a mesoscale descending inflow jet. During the ensuing ERC event, the primary eyewall weakened and ultimately collapsed, resulting in a brief period of weakening. The second SEF event displayed characteristics consistent with unbalanced boundary layer dynamics. Additionally, it is plausible that both SEF events were affected by the stagnation and axisymmeterization of outward-propagating vortex Rossby waves.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL SUMMARY Atlantic Hurricane Season of 2003
    1744 MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW VOLUME 133 ANNUAL SUMMARY Atlantic Hurricane Season of 2003 MILES B. LAWRENCE,LIXION A. AVILA,JOHN L. BEVEN,JAMES L. FRANKLIN,RICHARD J. PASCH, AND STACY R. STEWART Tropical Prediction Center, National Hurricane Center, NOAA/NWS, Miami, Florida (Manuscript received 30 April 2004, in final form 8 November 2004) ABSTRACT The 2003 Atlantic hurricane season is described. The season was very active, with 16 tropical storms, 7 of which became hurricanes. There were 49 deaths directly attributed to this year’s tropical cyclones. 1. Introduction hurricane, and Isabel’s category-2 landfall on the Outer There were 16 named tropical cyclones of at least Banks of North Carolina brought hurricane conditions tropical storm strength in the Atlantic basin during to portions of North Carolina and Virginia and record 2003, 7 of which became hurricanes. Table 1 lists these flood levels to the upper Chesapeake Bay. Elsewhere, tropical storms and hurricanes, along with their dates, Erika made landfall on the northeastern Mexico’s Gulf maximum 1-min wind speeds, minimum central sea Coast as a category-1 hurricane, Fabian was the most level pressures, deaths, and U.S. damage. Figure 1 destructive hurricane to hit Bermuda in over 75 yr, and shows the “best tracks” of this season’s storms. Juan was the worst hurricane to hit Halifax, Nova The numbers of tropical storms and hurricanes dur- Scotia, in over 100 yr. ing 2003 are above the long-term (1944–2003) averages This season’s tropical cyclones took 49 lives in the of 10 named storms, of which 6 become hurricanes.
    [Show full text]