Pennsylvania 9-1-1 Or Reflections & Redevelopment: Keeping a Historic

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pennsylvania 9-1-1 Or Reflections & Redevelopment: Keeping a Historic Pennsylvania 9-1-1 or Reflections & Redevelopment: Keeping a Historic Railroad Hotel on Track Joe Urso PR-891 05/13/2020 Bethany Bingham Lakan Cole Advisor: Kevin Wolfe Reader: Steven Lepore Acknowledgements: I would like to take this opportunity to bestow my sincerest gratitude to all who both inspired my thesis topic and dedicated their time to helping me develop it in writing. Thank you first to my thesis professors, Bethany Bingham and Lakan Cole for assisting me in identifying my topic and organizing the components of this study. I realize that leading this class was not your sole obligation this semester, so the time you gave to each of us in our quarterly progress meetings, as well as the feedback you gave for each of our chapters we consider invaluable. Your help was greatly appreciated! Thank you to my thesis advisor, Architect Kevin Wolfe. Your careful evaluation and stern notation of my writing in every chapter tremendously improved the overall quality and fluidity of how it reads. Speaking of credit where credit is due, thank you also for indicating where citations were needed and clarifying the proper format of all citations in my thesis. Without your input throughout the semester, my writing would be far inferior to what it is. A special thank you to my ideal third reader, Hotel Pennsylvania Preservation Society member, Steven Lepore. I was honored to be able to work with you to develop my thesis. You possess a wealth of knowledge about the history of Hotel Pennsylvania as well as current events taking place there. I couldn’t have asked for better sources and images of the hotel than what you provided for me. Thank you for helping me to refine the accuracy in many details throughout. Having contact with a fellow preservation advocate for Hotel Pennsylvania reinforced my confidence in this thesis as being part of a much larger cause. Thank you Mr. Lepore and the entire Hotel Pennsylvania Preservation Society! Thank you to all my fellow classmates and all members of the faculty for your valued and appreciated feedback to my in-progress thesis presentations. Over the past two semesters, I have taken very seriously all the input and suggestions you have given me. Through all the stressful working and reworking, I have been grateful for your support from the start. Thank you all and I wish you the best of luck in return! Lastly, I would just like to include this excerpt from a speech given by the inspirational Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis during the fight for preserving Grand Central Station: “If we don’t care about our past we can’t have very much hope for our future. We’ve all heard that it’s too late, or that it has to happen, that it’s inevitable. But I don’t think that’s true. Because I think if there is a great effort, even if it’s the eleventh hour, then you can succeed and I know that’s what we’ll do”. Table of Contents: Chapter I: Introduction - Prologue………………………………………………………………………………….04 - Goal Statement…………………………………………………………………………...09 - Methodology……………………………………………………………………………..09 - Literature Review………………………………………………………………………...11 - Organization of Study……………………………………………………………………19 Chapter II: About the Case - Midtown Redevelopment………………………………………………………………...20 - Hotel Pennsylvania: 1919-2020………………………………………………...…….….28 - Advocacy Groups………….………………………………..……………………………37 Chapter III: Analysis - Recent Development in the Penn District………..…………………………………..…..38 - Development Pressure on Hotel Pennsylvania………………………………….……….44 - Evaluation of Integrity…………………………………………………………………...46 - Interior Landmarking…………………………………………………………………….49 - Prospects for Hotel Pennsylvania………………………………………………………..52 Chapter IV: Precedents & Findings - Hotel Commodore………………………………………………………………………..53 - Roosevelt Hotel…………………………………………………………………………..57 - Findings: Renovation…………………………………………………………………….59 - Findings: Rehabilitation………………………………………………………………….60 - Renovation vs. Rehabilitation……………………………………………………………62 - Findings: Finances & Penn District Active Projects………………………………...…..64 - New York City & U.S. Federal Standards for Historic Preservation…………………….66 Chapter V: Conclusion - Recommendations………………………………………………………………………..68 - Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………….76 Bibliography - Chapter I…....…………………………………………………………………………….81 - Chapter II………………………………………………………………………………...81 - Chapter III………………………………………………………………………………..82 - Chapter IV………………………………………………………………………………..84 Chapter I: Introduction Prologue New architectural development universally defines and redefines the cityscape. Each day New York City gains a new tower, each one climbing ever higher into the atmosphere and competing for a place in the skyline. Rapid large-scale development is accepted as a vital ingredient for any city to stay “globally competitive” (Horsely 2010). Thus, it is not difficult to understand how preserving historic architecture has been met with opposition from real estate developers who prefer to keep marching forward into the new. Ever since the 1960s, historic preservation has gained a significant following in major cities. Wherever redevelopment is sought, controversy is sparked between groups, be them public vs. private, moral vs. political, or social vs. economical, on whether existing historic buildings can contribute to the revised city district. This thesis aims to bestow legitimacy on retaining historic structures in urban areas experiencing new waves of redevelopment. Case studies and published work will provide the foundations for validation of urban historic preservation on economic, legal, and educational levels. The overwhelming tendency of real estate enterprises to underestimate the tangible and intangible value of historic buildings has claimed or endangered great swathes of unique aged structures over the past century. An old building is seldom considered important when it falls into developers’ hands, particularly if the area around it is built up over time. In this situation the building may become expendable. The advent of the Landmarks Law, the National Register of Historic Places, as well as the state and local registers helps to ensure the protection of select historical works of architecture (nypap.org 2016). Regardless, for all their efforts and accomplishments, historic preservationists are constantly facing setbacks, hurdles and roadblocks on the path to success. New York’s Landmark’s Law is only 55 years old, being enacted officially in 1965 (nypap.org 2016). Since then, historic preservation has thrived significantly with the enactment of subsequent policies and legislations further defining the technicalities of preservation in urban settings. It has proven effective over the past half century in spite of the pressure for redevelopment. New York City has over 140 historic districts and more than 30,000 historic buildings listed at the federal or state levels (1.nyc.gov 2019). Unfortunately this saving grace is not applicable to every aged structure. The criteria for listing and designation is not always present in buildings that may otherwise be considered by their community to be historically significant. The lack of such designations may put these buildings in a vulnerable position. Hotel Pennsylvania located between West 32nd and 33rd Street at 7th Avenue across from Penn Station is one such example of preserve vs. redevelop. The historic hotel has been falling to the wayside in the rapidly developing Penn District of Midtown, Manhattan. For the last two decades its owner, Vornado Realty Trust has been entertaining a plan that involves the demolition and replacement of the hotel with a 65-story mixed-use tower featuring over 8 million square feet of commercial office space. Throughout this period of time there has been little concern from the preservation community about the possible fate of Hotel Pennsylvania. Previous evaluations for landmarking it were requested in 2007 by the Hotel Pennsylvania Preservation Society. These efforts were ultimately unsuccessful and since then advocacy for preserving the hotel has been fairly quiet (Horsely 2010). The hotel briefly came back into the spotlight when it reached its centennial in early 2019. Unrelated to this, Vornado Realty Trust has frozen its plans to redevelop the lot and has committed itself to a three-phase renovation of the hotel’s interior guest spaces (Little 2019). The first two phases consist of improving the guest rooms and are mostly complete. Phase three will involve more guest rooms, but will more importantly focus on the underutilized public hospitality and commercial areas of the hotel’s lower floors. Vornado Realty Trust bought Hotel Pennsylvania in 1997 in a joint venture with Singaporean hotel developer and financier, Ong Beng Seng. After an ultimately disinvested attempt at capitalizing on the hotel, Vornado Realty Trust announced in 2007 that it had made the first official plans to demolish and replace it with a 65 story skyscraper by 2011 (Schnell 2013). The plan seemed imminent, but issues with securing a reputable anchor tenant to occupy the lower floors of the tower have repeatedly halted the project up to the present. Now, at least for the current time, Vornado Realty Trust is investing in Hotel Pennsylvania through extensive renovations and updates to the guest rooms as well as the public areas. Unfortunately there seems to be minimal effort put forth by the firm to showcase the hotel’s historic qualities (Little 2019). In the surrounding area, what has long been a mix of districts and building use has become the site of extensive rebranding
Recommended publications
  • CUA V44 1952 53 10.Pdf (12.36Mb)
    CORNELL UNIVERSITY OFFICIAL PUBLICATION NOVEMBER 4, 1951 S c h o o l o j H otel A dm inistration ANNOUNCEMENT FOR SESSIONS OF 1951-52 and 1952-53 The University Calendar 1951-52 1952-53 FALL TERM FALL TERM Freshman Orientation Sept. 14, F Sept. 19, F Registration ...................................... Sept. 17-18,M-T Sept. 22-23, M-T Instruction begins .......................... Sept. 19, W, 1 p.m. Sept. 24, W, 1 p.m. Midterm grades due Nov. 7, W Nov. 12, M Thanksgiving recess: Instruction suspended Nov. 21, W, 12:50 p.m. Nov. 26, W, 12:50 p.m. Instruction resumed Nov. 26, M, 8 a.m. Dec. 1, M, 8 a.m. Christmas Recess: Instruction suspended Dec. 19, W, 10 p.m. Dec. 20, S, 12:50 p.m. Instruction resumed ................ Jan. 3, T h , 8 a.m. Jan. 5, M, 8 a.m. Examinations begin ..................... Jan. 21, M Jan. 26, M Examinations end Jan. 30, M Feb. 4, H Midyear holiday Jan. 31, T h Feb. 5, T h SPRING TERM SPRING TERM Registration Feb. 1-2, F —S Feb. 6-7, F —S Instruction begins Feb. 4, M Feb. 9, M Midterm grades due Mar. 22, S Mar. 28, Spring recess: Instruction suspended Mar. 22, S, 12:50 p.m. Mar. 28, S, 12:50 p.m. Instruction resumed .................Mar. 31, M, 8 a.m. Apr. 6, M, 8 a.m. Examinations begin May 26, M June 1, M Examinations end June 3, T June 9, T Commencement Day June 9, M June 15, M CORNELL UNIVERSITY OFFICIAL PUBLICATION Published by Cornell University at Ithaca, New York, every two weeks throughout the year.
    [Show full text]
  • Murdoch's Global Plan For
    CNYB 05-07-07 A 1 5/4/2007 7:00 PM Page 1 TOP STORIES Portrait of NYC’s boom time Wall Street upstart —Greg David cashes in on boom on the red hot economy in options trading Page 13 PAGE 2 ® New Yorkers are stepping to the beat of Dancing With the Stars VOL. XXIII, NO. 19 WWW.NEWYORKBUSINESS.COM MAY 7-13, 2007 PRICE: $3.00 PAGE 3 Times Sq. details its growth, worries Murdoch’s about the future PAGE 3 global plan Under pressure, law firms offer corporate clients for WSJ contingency fees PAGE 9 421-a property tax Times, CNBC and fight heads to others could lose Albany; unpacking out to combined mayor’s 2030 plan Fox, Dow Jones THE INSIDER, PAGE 14 BY MATTHEW FLAMM BUSINESS LIVES last week, Rupert Murdoch, in a ap images familiar role as insurrectionist, up- RUPERT MURDOCH might bring in a JOINING THE PARTY set the already turbulent media compatible editor for The Wall Street Journal. landscape with his $5 billion offer for Dow Jones & Co. But associ- NEIL RUBLER of Vantage Properties ates and observers of the News media platform—including the has acquired several Corp. chairman say that last week planned Fox Business cable chan- thousand affordable was nothing compared with what’s nel—and take market share away housing units in the in store if he acquires the property. from rivals like CNBC, Reuters past 16 months. Campaign staffers They foresee a reinvigorated and the Financial Times. trade normal lives for a Dow Jones brand that will combine Furthermore, The Wall Street with News Corp.’s global assets to Journal would vie with The New chance at the White NEW POWER BROKERS House PAGE 39 create the foremost financial news York Times to shape the national and information provider.
    [Show full text]
  • MTA Construction & Development, the Group Within the Agency Responsible for All Capital Construction Work
    NYS Senate East Side Access/East River Tunnels Oversight Hearing May 7, 2021 Opening / Acknowledgements Good morning. My name is Janno Lieber, and I am the President of MTA Construction & Development, the group within the agency responsible for all capital construction work. I want to thank Chair Comrie and Chair Kennedy for the invitation to speak with you all about some of our key MTA infrastructure projects, especially those where we overlap with Amtrak. Mass transit is the lifeblood of New York, and we need a strong system to power our recovery from this unprecedented crisis. Under the leadership of Governor Cuomo, New York has demonstrated national leadership by investing in transformational mega-projects like Moynihan Station, Second Avenue Subway, East Side Access, Third Track, and most recently, Metro-North Penn Station Access, which we want to begin building this year. But there is much more to be done, and more investment is needed. We have a once-in-a-generation infrastructure opportunity with the new administration in Washington – and we thank President Biden, Secretary Buttigieg and Senate Majority Leader, Chuck Schumer, for their support. It’s a new day to advance transit projects that will turbo-charge the post-COVID economy and address overdue challenges of social equity and climate change. East Side Access Today we are on the cusp of a transformational upgrade to our commuter railroads due to several key projects. Top of the list is East Side Access. I’m pleased to report that it is on target for completion by the end of 2022 as planned.
    [Show full text]
  • Worker Resistance to Company Unions: the Employe Representation Plan of the Pennsylvania Railroad, 1920-1935
    WORKER RESISTANCE TO COMPANY UNIONS: THE EMPLOYE REPRESENTATION PLAN OF THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD, 1920-1935 Albert Churella Southern Polytechnic State University Panel: Railway Organisations and the Responses of Capitalism and Governments, 1830-1940: A National and Internationally Comparative View William Wallace Atterbury, the PRR Vice-President in Charge of Operation, believed that a golden age of harmony between management and labor had existed prior to the period of federal government control of the railway industry, during and immediately after World War I. Following the Outlaw Strike of 1920, Atterbury attempted to recreate that mythic golden age through the Employe Representation Plan. Workers, however, saw the Employe Representation Plan for the company union that it was, ultimately leading to far more serious labor-management confrontations. Illustration 1 originally appeared in the Machinists’ Monthly Journal 35 (May 1923), 235. Introduction The vicious railway strikes that tore across the United States in 1877 marked the emergence of class conflict in the United States. They also shattered the illusion that the managers and employees of the Pennsylvania Railroad (PRR) shared a common bond of familial loyalty and dedication to their Company. For the next forty years, PRR executives attempted to reestablish that sense of loyalty, harkening back to an imagined pre-industrial past, redolent with harmony and cooperation. As late as 1926, the PRR’s treasurer, Albert J. County, spoke for his fellow executives when he suggested that “the Chief problems of human relations in our time, as affecting the great transportation systems and manufacturing plants, have therefore been to find effective substitutes for that vanished personal contact between management and men, to the end that the old feeling of unity and partnership, which under favorable conditions spontaneously existed when the enterprises were smaller, might be restored.”1 PRR executives attempted to recreate “the old feeling of unity and partnership” with periodic doses of welfare capitalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Vornado Realty Trust
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM 8-K Current report filing Filing Date: 2017-06-05 | Period of Report: 2017-06-05 SEC Accession No. 0001104659-17-037358 (HTML Version on secdatabase.com) FILER VORNADO REALTY TRUST Mailing Address Business Address 888 SEVENTH AVE 888 SEVENTH AVE CIK:899689| IRS No.: 221657560 | State of Incorp.:MD | Fiscal Year End: 0317 NEW YORK NY 10019 NEW YORK NY 10019 Type: 8-K | Act: 34 | File No.: 001-11954 | Film No.: 17889956 212-894-7000 SIC: 6798 Real estate investment trusts VORNADO REALTY LP Mailing Address Business Address 888 SEVENTH AVE 210 ROUTE 4 EAST CIK:1040765| IRS No.: 133925979 | State of Incorp.:DE | Fiscal Year End: 1231 NEW YORK NY 10019 PARAMUS NJ 07652 Type: 8-K | Act: 34 | File No.: 001-34482 | Film No.: 17889957 212-894-7000 SIC: 6798 Real estate investment trusts Copyright © 2017 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, DC 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): June 5, 2017 VORNADO REALTY TRUST (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter) Maryland No. 001-11954 No. 22-1657560 (State or Other (Commission (IRS Employer Jurisdiction of File Number) Identification No.) Incorporation) VORNADO REALTY L.P. (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter) Delaware No. 001-34482 No. 13-3925979 (State or Other (Commission (IRS Employer Jurisdiction of
    [Show full text]
  • Amtrak Station Development
    REAL ESTATE TRANSACTION ADVISORY SERVICES • Improving Performance and Value of Amtrak-owned Assets AMTRAK STATION DEVELOPMENT New York Penn Station| Moynihan Train Hall| Philadelphia 30th Street Station Baltimore Penn Station| Washington Union Station | Chicago Union Station • Pre-Proposal WebEx | August 5, 2016 Rina Cutler –1 Sr. Director, Major Station Planning and Development AASHTO Conference| September 11, 2018 SUSTAINABLE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE 1 AMTRAK MAJOR STATIONS Amtrak is actively improving & redeveloping five stations: Chicago Union Station, NY Penn Station, Baltimore Penn Station, Washington Union Station and 30th Street Station in Philadelphia. NEW YORK PENN STATION WASHINGTON UNION STATION #1 busiest Amtrak Station #2 busiest Amtrak Station NEW YORK PENN STATION ● 10.3 million passengers ● 5.1 million passengers PHILADELPHIA 30TH ● $1 billion ticket revenue ● $576 million ticket revenue CHICAGO BALTIMORE PENN STATION STREET STATION UNION STATION ● 1,055,000 SF of building area ● 1,268,000 SF of building area WASHINGTON UNION STATION ● 31.0 acres of land PHILADELPHIA 30TH STREET STATION CHICAGO UNION STATION BALTIMORE PENN STATION #3 busiest Amtrak Station #4 busiest Amtrak Station #8 busiest Amtrak Station ● 4.3 million passengers ● 3.4 million passengers ● 1.0 million passengers ● $306 million revenue ● $205 million ticket revenue ● $95 million ticket revenue ● 1,140,200 SF of building area ● 1,329,000 SF of building area ● 91,000 SF of building area FY 2017 Ridership and Ridership Revenue 2 MAJOR STATION PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Planner's Guide 2019
    AN ADVERTISING SUPPLEMENT TO CRAin’S NEW YORK BUSINESS MEETING Planner’S GUIDE 2019 YOUR RESOURCE FOR SUCCESSFUL MEETINGS AND EVENTS IF YOU ARE A MEETING or event hotels in the New York City area. than other channels. A lot of that a trend toward “bleisure,” the walk the line between creating planner you are part of an elite, Our goal is to keep you ahead value comes from networking in combining of business travel and experiences that resonate with multi-talented group. Being a of the curve and one up on the person. One-on-one meetings leisure. Today’s event attendees the whole audience, as well as planner calls for a wide range of competition in 2019. have become a hot commodity; expect event planners to be equal with individual attendees. expert skills and qualifications, To that end, here are some research has shown that, after parts manager and travel agent. such as managing, budgeting and of the meeting and event trends content, networking is the sec- Everything from programming to GIVE THEM execution, knowledge of tech- to consider when planning ond biggest motivator for event catering is likely to reference the A SHOW nology, creative talent—not to this year: attendees today. And the term locality and culture of the desti- 2019 also sees a trend for the mention leadership, adaptability, “networking” covers everything nation both on-site and off. “festivalization” of meetings and people skills, patience and energy IN YOUR FACE from spontaneous conversations events. A growing number of (to name just a few). When you “Face time” is the buzzword to huddle rooms and meet-and- TAKE IT PERSONAlly gatherings are adding perfor- possess all of these qualities you in meetings and events for greets.
    [Show full text]
  • Finance Committee Meeting
    Finance Committee Meeting November 2016 Committee Members L. Schwartz, Chair F. Ferrer, Vice Chair D. Jones C. Moerdler J. Molloy M. Pally J. Samuelson P. Trottenberg V. Vanterpool J. Vitiello P. Ward C. Wortendyke N. Zuckerman Finance Committee Meeting 2 Broadway, 20th Floor Board Room New York, NY 10004 Monday, 11/14/2016 12:30 - 1:45 PM ET 1. PUBLIC COMMENTS PERIOD 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – OCTOBER 26, 2016 Finance Committee Minutes - Page 4 3. 2016 COMMITTEE WORK PLAN 2016 Work Plan - Page 14 4. BUDGETS/CAPITAL CYCLE Finance Watch - Page 22 5. MTA HEADQUARTERS & ALL-AGENCY ITEMS Action Item Law Firm Panel Addition - Page 32 Report and Information Items Station Maintenance Billing Update - Page 34 Review and Assessment of the Finance Committee Charter - Page 37 Procurements MTAHQ Procurement Report - Page 40 MTAHQ Competitive Procurement - Page 42 6. METRO-NORTH RAILROAD MNR Action Item - Page 44 MNR Procurements - Page 46 7. LONG ISLAND RAIL ROAD (No Items) 8. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT, and MTA BUS OPERATIONS NYCT & MTACC Procurements - Page 54 9. BRIDGES AND TUNNELS (No Items) 10. FIRST MUTUAL TRANSPORTATION ASSURANCE COMPANY (No Items) 11. MTA CONSOLIDATED REPORTS Statement of Operations - Page 64 Overtime - Page 72 Subsidy, Interagency Loans and Stabilization Fund Transactions - Page 77 Debt Service - Page 85 Positions - Page 87 Farebox Recovery Ratios - Page 90 MTA Ridership - Page 91 Fuel Hedge Program - Page 115 12. REAL ESTATE AGENDA Real Estate Action Items - Page 118 Real Estate Info Items - Page 131 Minutes of the MTA Finance Committee Meeting October 26, 2016 2 Broadway, 20th Floor Board Room New York, NY 10004 12:00 PM The following Finance Committee members attended: Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Amazon's Document
    REQUEST FOR INFORMATION Project Clancy TALENT A. Big Questions and Big Ideas 1. Population Changes and Key Drivers. a. Population level - Specify the changes in total population in your community and state over the last five years and the major reasons for these changes. Please also identify the majority source of inbound migration. Ne Yok Cit’s populatio ge fo . illio to . illio oe the last fie eas ad is projected to surpass 9 million by 2030.1 New York City continues to attract a dynamic and diverse population of professionals, students, and families of all backgrounds, mainly from Latin America (including the Caribbean, Central America, and South America), China, and Eastern Europe.2 Estiate of Ne York City’s Populatio Year Population 2011 8,244,910 2012 8,336,697 2013 8,405,837 2014 8,491,079 2015 8,550,405 2016 8,537,673 Source: American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates Cumulative Estimates of the Components of Population Change for New York City and Counties Time period: April 1, 2010 - July 1, 2016 Total Natural Net Net Net Geographic Area Population Increase Migration: Migration: Migration: Change (Births-Deaths) Total Domestic International New York City Total 362,540 401,943 -24,467 -524,013 499,546 Bronx 70,612 75,607 -3,358 -103,923 100,565 Brooklyn 124,450 160,580 -32,277 -169,064 136,787 Manhattan 57,861 54,522 7,189 -91,811 99,000 1 New York City Population Projections by Age/Sex & Borough, 2010-2040 2 Place of Birth for the Foreign-Born Population in 2012-2016, American Community Survey PROJECT CLANCY PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL 4840-0257-2381.3 1 Queens 102,332 99,703 7,203 -148,045 155,248 Staten Island 7,285 11,531 -3,224 -11,170 7,946 Source: Population Division, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • A Blueprint for Cronyism President Trump’S Illegal Infrastructure Plan to Enrich His Friends
    AP Photo/Charles Rex Arbogast A Blueprint For Cronyism President Trump’s Illegal Infrastructure Plan to Enrich His Friends JANUARY 30, 2018 1 A Blueprint For Cronyism President Trump’s Illegal Infrastructure Plan to Enrich His Friends President Trump made rebuilding America’s infrastructure a central part of his campaign, promising to invest in “the next generation of roads, bridges, railways, tunnels, sea ports, and airports.” But that’s not the President’s plan. Instead, what President Trump will outline is a blueprint for cronyism: An infrastructure proposal illegally developed in secret that is designed to further enrich people like President Trump, his business associates, and his friends. The proposal, details of which have been slowly leaked to the press, follows months of closed-door meetings by Pres- AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster ident Trump’s “Infrastructure Council,” a group of well-con- President Trump’s infrastructure plan is the capstone of nected individuals tasked by the President to design and these efforts. The plan appears to allow the Administration direct federal infrastructure policy. Members of the Infra- to award new infrastructure grants directly to private com- structure Council are long-time friends and business asso- panies, empower companies to charge tolls and fees on ciates of President Trump and his family, are unfettered by America’s roads and bridges, cut career officials and agency conflict-of-interest rules designed to prevent corruption, and experts out of project and permitting decisions, and elim- stand to benefit from the President’s infrastructure policies. inate regulatory and legal safeguards that protect against We’ve already seen the consequences of President Trump’s corruption.
    [Show full text]
  • Hotel Administration 1962-1963
    CORNELL UNIVERSITY ANNOUNCEMENTS JULY 24, 1962 HOTEL ADMINISTRATION 1962-1963 SCHOOL OF HOTEL ADMINISTRATION ACADEMIC CALENDAR (Tentative) 1962-1963 1963-1964 Sept. 15. ...S ..................Freshman Orientation......................................................Sept. 21... .S Sept. 17...M ..................Registration, new students..............................................Sept. 23...M Sept. 18...T ..................Registration, old students................................................Sept. 24...T Sept. 19...W ..................Instruction begins, 1 p.m.................................................Sept. 25...W Nov. 7....W ..................Midterm grades due..........................................................Nov. 13...W Thanksgiving recess: Nov. 21.. .W ..................Instruction suspended, 12:50 p.m.................................. Nov. 27...W Nov. 26...M..................Instruction resumed, 8 a.m..............................................Dec. 2 ....M Dec. 19. .. .V V ..................Christmas recess..................................................................Dec. 21... .S Instruction suspended: 10 p.m. in 1962, 12:50 p.m. in 1963 Jan. 3.. .Th ..................Instruction resumed, 8 a.m............................................. Jan. 6... ,M Jan. 19 S..................First-term instruction ends............................................Jan. 25 S Jan. 21....M...................Second-term registration, old students......................Jan. 27....M Jan. 22. ...T ...................Examinations begin.........................................................Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuts for the Nutcracker
    CULINARY SCHOOLS reel in younger students CRAIN’S® PAGE 45 NEW YORK BUSINESS VOL. XXVIII, NO. 49 WWW.CRAINSNEWYORK.COM DECEMBER 3-9, 2012 PRICE: $3.00 Another bankrupt Nuts Brooklyn hospital for The Interfaith Medical Center to file for Nutcracker Chapter 11 this week BY BARBARA BENSON The ballet’s not just a holiday Crushed by long-term debt and ex- mainstay, it’s plum cash that no penses that far outstrip revenue, Inter- faith Medical Center will file for bank- dance company can live without ruptcy this week,making the Brooklyn facility the 11th city hospital or health system since 2005 to go belly up. BY THERESA AGOVINO Behind that grim statistic is a com- mon story:New York City hospitals on Black Friday not only kicks off the start of the holiday shopping the financial ropes can no longer count season, it also marks the beginning of the annual run of The Nut- on a bailout from Albany.For years,the See INTERFAITH on Page 44 crackerat the New York City Ballet.And it turns out that discount- ed cashmere sweaters and sugarplum fairies have much in com- mon: They are both cash cows. THE FUTURE OF NYC Just as retailers count on holiday CRACKIN’ NUT shoppers for a big chunk of their Number of Nutcracker annual sales, the ballet compa- productions per year in Mortgage ny generates 45% of its year- New York City ly revenue, or about $12 2010 14 productions break’s million, from the extrava- ganza. “It is very important to us,” said Katherine loss feared Brown, executive director 2011 17 productions of the New York City Bal- NYC homeowners let.
    [Show full text]