Critical Race and Whiteness Studies
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Critical Race and Whiteness Studies www.acrawsa.org.au/ejournal Volume 10, Number 2, 2014 10th ANNIVERSARY SPECIAL ISSUE OF CRITICAL RACE AND WHITENESS STUDIES Critical Race and Whiteness Studies Review Survey— Monographs, Journals, and Theses, 2005-2014 Elaine Laforteza Macquarie University Lara Palombo Macquarie University Holly Randell-Moon University of Otago The inception of the Critical Race and Whiteness Studies journal in 2005 was a response to the need to critically challenge the ways in which racial privileges formed geopolitical, socio-economic, and socio-cultural ways of being, knowing, and becoming. At its genesis, this journal was named the Australian Critical Race and Whiteness Studies Association e-journal and has since been renamed to account for the broader transnational scope of the articles and reviews in terms of critical race and whiteness studies (CRWS) scholarship. Through its ten year journey, Critical Race and Whiteness Studies offers critical snapshots of a larger picture composed of the various works that engage with CRWS. This review article aims to provide a bibliography of some of the monographs and books, journal articles and special issues as well as masters and doctoral dissertations that were produced from 2005-2014. Coinciding with the ten year anniversary of the Critical Race and Whiteness Studies journal, this bibliographic survey celebrates and reflects on the past ten years of CRWS scholarship. Keywords: Critical race and whiteness studies, critical race theory, bibliography, survey, books, monographs, journals, dissertations Introduction The purpose of this review article is two-fold. Firstly, the survey aims to illuminate the critical, rigorous, and innovative work that has been developed from the inception of the journal Critical Race and Whiteness Studies in 2005 to ISSN 1838-8310 © Australian Critical Race and Whiteness Studies Association 2014 Critical Race and Whiteness Studies 10.2 the present. The review coincides with the ten-year anniversary of the journal’s publication of critical race and whiteness studies (CRWS) scholarship. Secondly, this article offers a summative and representative guide for early and established scholars, community workers, activists, and students for researching texts that concern themselves with critical race and whiteness studies. The review article surveys monographs, edited book collections, journal articles and special issues, as well as masters and doctoral theses produced in the last ten years (2005- 2014) which engage critical race theory and whiteness studies, or in the case of fictional novels, involve topics that deal with race and whiteness. Each bibliographical survey is accompanied by a summary that outlines some of the theoretical, geographical, and disciplinary concentrations and insights made within the field of CRWS. The review article is divided into three sections: monographs and edited book collections, journal articles and special issues, and masters and doctoral theses. Once the CRWS literature was collated in these mediums, the authors used qualitative methods to assess and group the data into common themes based on theoretical and conceptual approach, disciplinary field, subject area, and geographical location. The review is summative and representative. Rather than collate all extant CRWS material into an exhaustive list (which was a daunting task), the authors decided to use the article and its findings as a representative sampling of CRWS scholarship. Undoubtedly, there are gaps in the bibliographic entries owing to the exigencies of the survey’s scope within a journal article format and the expertise of the article’s authors. The survey is problematically limited to European and English-speaking texts as the material was primarily sourced through open access databases. We have also not included blogs, artworks, video-games, or music. However, we encourage our readers to research and actively engage with the aforementioned texts, and perhaps, use our bibliographies as a means to critically engage with them. Despite the survey’s shortcomings, we hope the article’s findings prove productive for readers as a jumping off point for further interdisciplinary research. Monographs and Edited Book Collections Elaine Laforteza Since the establishment of Critical Race and Whiteness Studies there have been many seminal books and monographs published on CRWS theories, practices, and stories. This bibliographical survey lists some of this work from 2005-2014. It is by no means an exhaustive list of books/monographs that concern themselves with critical race theory, whiteness studies, and work that marks out racialised privileges, their effects and consequences. As stipulated in the Introduction to this article, the list is intended as a springboard for readers to undertake further research if they wish. Moreover, this bibliographical survey only includes texts written in English and focuses mainly on settler colonial nation-states and their citizens (both indigenous and migrants). It also does not include chapters within books that pertain to critical race and whiteness studies (CRWS), but does include edited collections that explicate the themes and motivations undergirding CRWS. The terms used in this survey are also problematic. Descriptors such as ‘non-white’ intimate whiteness as the basis from which identity can be catalogued. It is not my intention to replicate this bias, but rather to reflect on this racialised privilege by drawing on the lexicon of 2 Critical Race and Whiteness Studies 10.2 racialised language that forms the vocabulary from which scholars can reflect on whiteness, identity, and representation. Many of the books and monographs surveyed also pertain to my areas of interest. This strategy was not undertaken to reduce the focus of this survey, but rather to make my own subject positionality accountable in the process of this research. My areas of interest include: south-east Asian critical race studies (most particularly, Philippines-Australia relations), south-east Asian ‘beautification’ practices (for example skin-whitening, acquiring English language skills, etc.), and queer Asian-Australian studies. I am particularly interested in how Australian scholarship has investigated the aforementioned topics. This survey incorporates books and monographs that deal with my research interests, but also includes a rich gamut of various research foci that range from essays about Chicana/Xicana consciousness (see Moraga, 2011), British negotiations of racial, linguistic, and ethnic diversity (see Herbert, 2008), institutional pedagogies and the formation of minority voices and disciplines (see Cooks & Simpson, 2007 and Ferguson, 2012), to cybercultures and racialisation (see the section on ‘Cybercultures’), Australian Indigenous histories of resistance and solidarities (see Heiss, 2012; Huggins, 2005; Behrendt 2009; and the ‘Indigenous histories and sovereignties’ section), the ‘war on terror’ (see the ‘Post 9/11 and the “War on terror”’ section), autobiographical accounts of being a racial ‘Other’ within dominant white societies (see Pung, 2008), and more. While all these texts diverge into different socio-political issues, they coalesce in terms of their need to intervene into dominant discourses about race relations, challenge the privileging of whiteness, and their encouragement for readers to not simply take note of these experiences and messages, but to feel and embody the position of racialised (non)belonging. The autobiographical texts and works of fiction, for example, offer a creative ally for the academic texts in terms of ensuring reader interest and motivation to develop their own work in CRWS or to have CRWS inform their own work and perspectives on life. Overall, these texts, as well as the others listed in this bibliographical survey, bear witness to the racialised impositions and repositioning of bodies, whether individual or institutional. In building this summary, I situate the practice of witnessing as a process of speaking back to, and beyond, hegemonic and reductive norms in all socio- cultural and political contexts. This differs from the literature on witnessing that focuses on the forms of testimony presented by survivors of wartime trauma (Agamben, 1999; Langer, 1991; Smith, 2007).1 In his book, Remnants of Auschwitz: The witness and the archive, Agamben questions whether the violences executed in the Holocaust camps can be represented through testimonial evidence. He asserts that the ‘true’ witness to violence is the one who cannot testify. Their silence is witness enough to the unspeakable horrors one has lived through. Agamben goes on to make a distinction between those who survived and those who were killed or traumatised to the point that they are 1 The sections on witnessing in this summary can also be found in my book, Laforteza (2015). 3 Critical Race and Whiteness Studies 10.2 rendered mute by their horrific experiences. He specifies, “the survivors speak in their stead, by proxy, as pseudo-witnesses; they bear witness to the missing testimony” (1999, p. 34). Bearing witness, in this case, signals what is not there and what cannot be vocalised, “The untestifiable, that to which no one has borne witness, has a name … it is der Muselmann” (p. 41). In engaging with Agamben’s work on der Muselmann, Anat Ascher states, “the only testimony they can provide is their silence, the fact that they do not testify. The paradox resides in identifying the Muselmänner, the ones who cannot bear witness,