DOCSLIB.ORG

Mosquito Larvicides from Cyanobacteria Gerald A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Florida International University FIU Digital Commons FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations University Graduate School 4-16-2014 Mosquito Larvicides from Cyanobacteria Gerald A. Berry Florida International University, [email protected] DOI: 10.25148/etd.FI14071114 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Berry, Gerald A., "Mosquito Larvicides from Cyanobacteria" (2014). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1449. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/1449 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the University Graduate School at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Miami, Florida MOSQUITO LARVICIDES FROM CYANOBACTERIA A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in BIOLOGY by Gerald A. Berry 2014 To: Interim Dean Michael Heithaus College of Arts and Sciences This dissertation, written by Gerald A. Berry, and entitled Mosquito Larvicides from Cyanobacteria, having been approved in respect to style and intellectual content, is referred to you for judgment. We have read this dissertation and recommend that it be approved. _____________________________ Evelyn Gaiser _____________________________ Miroslav Gantar _____________________________ Kathleen Rein _____________________________ John P. Berry, Co-Major Professor _____________________________ Fernando G. Noriega, Co-Major Professor Date of defense: April 16, 2014 The dissertation of Gerald A. Berry is approved. _____________________________ Interim Dean Michael Heithaus College of Arts and Sciences _____________________________ Dean Lakshmi N. Reddi University Graduate School Florida International University, 2014 ii DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to my family for supporting me in this long endeavor and to the Universe for being such a fascinating venue inspiring me to learn all that I can. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank Dr. Pat Gibbs for his efforts in the DNA analysis. I thank Mayra Exposito for instructions in regards to IR operations. I thank Dr. Wentian Wang for advice and all around help. I thank my committee Dr. Evelyn Gaiser, Dr. Miroslav Gantar, Dr. Kathleen Rein, and Dr. Fernando G. Noriega for their instrumental guidance in the design and overall direction of my dissertation. I would also like to thank members of the Noriega laboratory (Dr. Mario Perez and Dr. Marcela Nouzova) for guidance in regards to rearing mosquito larvae and overall assay setup. Lastly, I would like to thank Dr. John P. Berry and laboratory members (Dr. Asha Jaja, Katherine Walton, and Dalton Steel) for efforts far too numerous to mention here. iv ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION MOSQUITO LARVICIDES FROM CYANOBACTERIA by Gerald A. Berry Florida International University, 2014 Miami, Florida Professor John P. Berry, Co-Major Professor Professor Fernando G. Noriega, Co-Major Professor Cyanobacteria (blue-green algae) produce a diverse array of toxic or otherwise bioactive metabolites. These allelochemicals may also play a role in defense against potential predators and grazers, particularly aquatic invertebrates and their larvae, including mosquitoes. Compounds derived from cyanobacteria collected from the Florida Everglades and other Florida waterways were investigated as insecticides against the mosquito Aedes aegypti, a vector of dengue and yellow fever. Screening of cyanobacterial biomass revealed several strains that exhibited mosquito larvicidal activity. Guided via bioassay guided fractionation, a non-polar compound from Leptolyngbya sp. 21-9-3 was found to be the most active component. Characterization revealed the prospective compound to be a monounsaturated fatty acid with the molecular formula C16H30O2. This is the first evidence of mosquito larvicidal activity for this particular fatty acid. With larvicidal becoming more prevalent, fatty acids should be explored for future mosquito control strategies. v TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE Chapter 1: Background ....................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Mosquitoes as disease vectors ................................................................................ 1 1.3 Targeting aquatic mosquito larvae instead of aerial adults ..................................... 3 1.4 The need for novel insecticides............................................................................... 4 1.4.1 Inadequacies of pyrethroids ........................................................................... 4 1.4.2 Human risk to pyrethroids ............................................................................. 6 1.4.3 Insect resistance to pyrethroids ...................................................................... 6 1.5 Cyanobacteria as a potential source for arthrocidal compounds ............................ 8 1.5.1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 8 1.5.2 Chemical defense against planktivores .......................................................... 8 1.5.2.1 Apparency theory .................................................................................. 8 1.5.2.2 Quantitative defenses of Microcystis aerugunosa against Daphnia ..... 9 1.6 Cyanobacteria as a potential source for mosquito larvicidal compounds ............. 10 1.6.1 Cyanobacteria and mosquito sympatry ........................................................ 10 1.6.2 Grazer choice of food within periphyton ..................................................... 11 1.6.3 Mosquito larvae feeding on periphyton ....................................................... 12 1.6.4 Cyanobacteria: Novel insecticides and candidates for biological control agents .................................................................................................................... 13 1.6.5 Effects of anatoxin-a and microcystin-LR on mosquito larvae ................... 15 Chapter 2: Mosquito Larvicidal Assay ............................................................................. 17 2.1 The larval developmental stage of choice ............................................................. 17 2.2 Development of the mosquito larvicidal assay ..................................................... 17 2.2.1 Treatments and resuspensions...................................................................... 17 2.2.2 Mosquito larvae: Egg production and handling of larvae ............................ 19 2.2.3 Evaluation of mosquito larvae ..................................................................... 21 2.2.4 Evaluation of negative controls and resuspensions on mosquito larvae ...... 21 2.2.5 Evaluation positive controls on mosquito larvae ......................................... 23 Chapter 3: Bioassay Guided Fractionation ....................................................................... 26 3.1 Background ........................................................................................................... 26 3.2 Bioassays............................................................................................................... 26 3.3 Fractionation ......................................................................................................... 27 3.4 Characterization .................................................................................................... 28 3.5 Proof of Principle .................................................................................................. 29 3.5.1 Introduction .................................................................................................. 29 3.5.2 Original purification of sulfated glycolipids ................................................ 29 3.5.3 Re-purification and bioassay guided fractionation of sulfated glycolipids . 31 3.5.4 Identification of re-purified of sulfated glycolipids ..................................... 31 3.5.5 Discussion .................................................................................................... 32 vi Chapter 4: Isolation and Characterization of Mosquito Larvicidal Compounds from Cyanobacteria ................................................................................................................... 34 4.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 34 4.2 Methods................................................................................................................. 35 4.2.1 Screening of cyanobacterial isolates ............................................................ 35 4.2.2 Screening of cyanobacterial biomass ........................................................... 35 4.2.3 Bioassay guided fractionation of 3 prospective larvicidal cyanobacteria .... 35 4.2.4 Purification of larvicidal compounds from Leptolyngbya sp. 21-9-3 .......... 37 4.2.5 Characterization of larvicidal compounds from Leptolyngbya sp. 21-9-3 .. 42 4.2.5.1 Liquid chromatography – mass spectrometry ..................................... 42 4.2.5.2 Nuclear magnetic resonance ............................................................... 42 4.2.5.3 Infrared spectroscopy
Recommended publications
  • Data-Driven Identification of Potential Zika Virus Vectors Michelle V Evans1,2*, Tad a Dallas1,3, Barbara a Han4, Courtney C Murdock1,2,5,6,7,8, John M Drake1,2,8

    Data-Driven Identification of Potential Zika Virus Vectors Michelle V Evans1,2*, Tad a Dallas1,3, Barbara a Han4, Courtney C Murdock1,2,5,6,7,8, John M Drake1,2,8

    RESEARCH ARTICLE Data-driven identification of potential Zika virus vectors Michelle V Evans1,2*, Tad A Dallas1,3, Barbara A Han4, Courtney C Murdock1,2,5,6,7,8, John M Drake1,2,8 1Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, United States; 2Center for the Ecology of Infectious Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, United States; 3Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California-Davis, Davis, United States; 4Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, United States; 5Department of Infectious Disease, University of Georgia, Athens, United States; 6Center for Tropical Emerging Global Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, United States; 7Center for Vaccines and Immunology, University of Georgia, Athens, United States; 8River Basin Center, University of Georgia, Athens, United States Abstract Zika is an emerging virus whose rapid spread is of great public health concern. Knowledge about transmission remains incomplete, especially concerning potential transmission in geographic areas in which it has not yet been introduced. To identify unknown vectors of Zika, we developed a data-driven model linking vector species and the Zika virus via vector-virus trait combinations that confer a propensity toward associations in an ecological network connecting flaviviruses and their mosquito vectors. Our model predicts that thirty-five species may be able to transmit the virus, seven of which are found in the continental United States, including Culex quinquefasciatus and Cx. pipiens. We suggest that empirical studies prioritize these species to confirm predictions of vector competence, enabling the correct identification of populations at risk for transmission within the United States. *For correspondence: mvevans@ DOI: 10.7554/eLife.22053.001 uga.edu Competing interests: The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  • Behavioural, Ecological, and Genetic Determinants of Mating and Gene

    Behavioural, Ecological, and Genetic Determinants of Mating and Gene

    Thesis committee Thesis supervisor Prof. dr. Marcel Dicke Professor of Entomology, Wageningen University Thesis co-supervisor Dr. Ir. Bart G.J. Knols Medical Entomologist, University of Amsterdam Other members Prof. dr. B.J. Zwaan, Wageningen University Prof. dr. P. Kager, University of Amsterdam Dr. Ir. P. Bijma, Wageningen University Dr. Ir. I.M.A. Heitkonig, Wageningen University This research was conducted under the auspices of the C. T. de Wit Graduate School for Production Ecology and Resource Conservation Behavioural, ecological and genetic determinants of mating and gene flow in African malaria mosquitoes Kija R.N. Ng’habi Thesis Submitted in fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of doctor at Wageningen University by the authority of the Rector Magnificus Prof. dr. M.J. Kropff, in the presence of the Thesis committee appointed by the Academic Board to be defended in public at on Monday 25 October 2010 at 11:00 a.m. in the Aula. Kija R.N. Ng’habi (2010) Behavioural, ecological and genetic determinants of mating and gene flow in African malaria mosquitoes PhD thesis, Wageningen University – with references – with summaries in Dutch and English ISBN – 978-90-8585-766-2 > Abstract Malaria is still a leading threat to the survival of young children and pregnant women, especially in the African region. The ongoing battle against malaria has been hampered by the emergence of drug and insecticide resistance amongst parasites and vectors, re- spectively. The Sterile Insect Technique (SIT) and genetically modified mosquitoes (GM) are new proposed vector control approaches. Successful implementation of these ap- proaches requires a better understanding of male mating biology of target mosquito species.
  • Geographic Heterogeneity in Anopheles Albimanus Microbiota Is

    Geographic Heterogeneity in Anopheles Albimanus Microbiota Is

    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.02.129619; this version posted June 2, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Preprint © 2020 Dada et al. under Geographic heterogeneity in the terms of CC BY-NC- SA 4.0 Anopheles albimanus microbiota Version: June 02, 2020 is lost within one generation of laboratory colonization Nsa Dadaa,d , Ana Cristina Benedictb, Francisco Lópezb, Juan C. Lolb, Mili Shethc, Nicole Dzurisa, Norma Padillab and Audrey Lenharta Abstract Research on mosquito-microbe interactions may lead to new tools for mosquito and mosquito- borne disease control. To date, such research has largely utilized laboratory-reared mosquitoes that may lack the microbial diversity of wild populations. To better understand how mosquito microbiota may vary across different geographic locations and upon laboratory colonization, we characterized the microbiota of F1 progeny of wild-caught adult Anopheles albimanus from four locations in Guatemala using high throughput 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. A total of 132 late instar larvae and 135 2-5day old, non-blood-fed virgin adult females were reared under identical laboratory conditions, pooled (3 individuals/pool) and analyzed. Larvae from mothers collected at different sites showed different microbial compositions (p=0.001; F = 9.5), but these differences were no longer present at the adult stage (p=0.12; F =1.6). This indicates that mosquitoes retain a significant portion of their field-derived microbiota throughout immature development but shed them before or during adult eclosion.
  • Flight Tone Characterisation of the South American Malaria Vector Anopheles Darlingi (Diptera: Culicidae)

    Flight Tone Characterisation of the South American Malaria Vector Anopheles Darlingi (Diptera: Culicidae)

    ORIGINAL ARTICLE Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Vol. 116: e200497, 2021 1|6 Flight tone characterisation of the South American malaria vector Anopheles darlingi (Diptera: Culicidae) Jose Pablo Montoya1, Hoover Pantoja-Sánchez2,3, Sebastian Gomez1,2, Frank William Avila4, Catalina Alfonso-Parra1,4/+ 1Universidad CES, Instituto Colombiano de Medicina Tropical, Sabaneta, Antioquia, Colombia 2Universidad de Antioquia, Departamento de Ingeniería Electrónica, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia 3Universidad de Antioquia, Programa de Estudio y Control de Enfermedades Tropicales, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia 4Universidad de Antioquia, Max Planck Tandem Group in Mosquito Reproductive Biology, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia BACKGROUND Flight tones play important roles in mosquito reproduction. Several mosquito species utilise flight tones for mate localisation and attraction. Typically, the female wingbeat frequency (WBF) is lower than males, and stereotypic acoustic behaviors are instrumental for successful copulation. Mosquito WBFs are usually an important species characteristic, with female flight tones used as male attractants in surveillance traps for species identification. Anopheles darlingi is an important Latin American malaria vector, but we know little about its mating behaviors. OBJECTIVES We characterised An. darlingi WBFs and examined male acoustic responses to immobilised females. METHODS Tethered and free flying male and female An. darlingi were recorded individually to determine their WBF distributions. Male-female acoustic interactions were analysed using tethered females and free flying males. FINDINGS Contrary to most mosquito species, An. darlingi females are smaller than males. However, the male’s WBF is ~1.5 times higher than the females, a common ratio in species with larger females. When in proximity to a female, males displayed rapid frequency modulations that decreased upon genitalia engagement.
  • Anopheles Albimanus Natural Microbiota Is Altered Within One Generation of Laboratory

    Anopheles Albimanus Natural Microbiota Is Altered Within One Generation of Laboratory

    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.02.129619; this version posted September 14, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Title: Anopheles albimanus natural microbiota is altered within one generation of laboratory 2 colonization 3 Authors: 4 Nsa Dadaa,d,#, Ana Cristina Benedictb, Francisco Lópezb, Juan C. Lolb, Mili Shethc, Nicole 5 Dzurisa, Norma Padillab and Audrey Lenharta 6 Author affiliations 7 a Entomology Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, 8 United States Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States of 9 America 10 b Grupo de Biología y Control de Vectores, Centro de Estudios en Salud, Universidad del Valle 11 de Guatemala, Guatemala 12 c Biotechnology Core Facility Branch, Division of Scientific Resources, National Center for 13 Emerging & Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, United States Centers for Disease Control and 14 Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States of America 15 dAmerican Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC, United States of America 16 #Address correspondence to Nsa Dada: [email protected] or [email protected] 17 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.02.129619; this version posted September 14, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
  • The Trichoptera of North Carolina

    The Trichoptera of North Carolina

    Families and genera within Trichoptera in North Carolina Spicipalpia (closed-cocoon makers) Integripalpia (portable-case makers) RHYACOPHILIDAE .................................................60 PHRYGANEIDAE .....................................................78 Rhyacophila (Agrypnia) HYDROPTILIDAE ...................................................62 (Banksiola) Oligostomis (Agraylea) (Phryganea) Dibusa Ptilostomis Hydroptila Leucotrichia BRACHYCENTRIDAE .............................................79 Mayatrichia Brachycentrus Neotrichia Micrasema Ochrotrichia LEPIDOSTOMATIDAE ............................................81 Orthotrichia Lepidostoma Oxyethira (Theliopsyche) Palaeagapetus LIMNEPHILIDAE .....................................................81 Stactobiella (Anabolia) GLOSSOSOMATIDAE ..............................................65 (Frenesia) Agapetus Hydatophylax Culoptila Ironoquia Glossosoma (Limnephilus) Matrioptila Platycentropus Protoptila Pseudostenophylax Pycnopsyche APATANIIDAE ..........................................................85 (fixed-retreat makers) Apatania Annulipalpia (Manophylax) PHILOPOTAMIDAE .................................................67 UENOIDAE .................................................................86 Chimarra Neophylax Dolophilodes GOERIDAE .................................................................87 (Fumanta) Goera (Sisko) (Goerita) Wormaldia LEPTOCERIDAE .......................................................88 PSYCHOMYIIDAE ....................................................68
  • Refinement of the Basin-Wide Index of Biotic Integrity for Non-Tidal Streams and Wadeable Rivers in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed

    Refinement of the Basin-Wide Index of Biotic Integrity for Non-Tidal Streams and Wadeable Rivers in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed

    Refinement of the Basin-Wide Index of Biotic Integrity for Non-Tidal Streams and Wadeable Rivers in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed APPENDICES Appendix A: Taxonomic Classification Appendix B: Taxonomic Attributes Appendix C: Taxonomic Standardization Appendix D: Rarefaction Appendix E: Biological Metric Descriptions Appendix F: Abiotic Parameters for Evaluating Stream Environment Appendix G: Stream Classification Appendix H: HUC12 Watershed Characteristics in Bioregions Appendix I: Index Methodologies Appendix J: Scoring Methodologies Appendix K: Index Performance, Accuracy, and Precision Appendix L: Narrative Ratings and Maps of Index Scores Appendix M: Potential Biases in the Regional Index Ratings Appendix Citations Appendix A: Taxonomic Classification All taxa reported in Chessie BIBI database were assigned the appropriate Phylum, Subphylum, Class, Subclass, Order, Suborder, Family, Subfamily, Tribe, and Genus when applicable. A portion of the taxa reported were reported under an invalid name according to the ITIS database. These taxa were subsequently changed to the taxonomic name deemed valid by ITIS. Table A-1. The taxonomic hierarchy of stream macroinvertebrate taxa included in the Chesapeake Bay non-tidal database.
  • Physical Mapping of the Anopheles (Nyssorhynchus) Darlingi Genomic Scaffolds

    Physical Mapping of the Anopheles (Nyssorhynchus) Darlingi Genomic Scaffolds

    insects Article Physical Mapping of the Anopheles (Nyssorhynchus) darlingi Genomic Scaffolds Míriam Silva Rafael 1,2,* , Leticia Cegatti Bridi 2 , Igor V. Sharakhov 3,4,5 , Osvaldo Marinotti 6 , Maria V. Sharakhova 3,4 , Vladimir Timoshevskiy 3,7, Giselle Moura Guimarães-Marques 2 , Valéria Silva Santos 2, Carlos Gustavo Nunes da Silva 8, Spartaco Astolfi-Filho 9 and Wanderli Pedro Tadei 1,2 1 Coordenação de Sociedade Ambiente e Saúde, Laboratório de Vetores de Malária e Dengue, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Av. André Araújo, 2936, Manaus, AM 69060-001, Brazil; [email protected] 2 Programa de Pós-Graduação em Genética, Conservação e Biologia Evolutiv, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Manaus, AM 69060-001, Brazil; [email protected] (L.C.B.); [email protected] (G.M.G.-M.); [email protected] (V.S.S.) 3 Department of Entomology and Fralin Life Science Institute, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA; [email protected] (I.V.S.); [email protected] (M.V.S.); [email protected] (V.T.) 4 Laboratory of Evolutionary Genomics of Insects, the Federal Research Center Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia 5 Department of Genetics and Cell Biology, Tomsk State University, 634050 Tomsk, Russia 6 MTEKPrime, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656, USA; [email protected] 7 Department of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA 8 Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal do Amazonas, Av. Rodrigo Otávio, 6.200. Coroado l, Manaus, AM 69080-900, Brazil; [email protected] 9 Laboratorio de Tecnologias de DNA, Divisão de Biotecnologia, Centro de Apoio Multidisciplinar, Citation: Rafael, M.S.; Bridi, L.C.; Universi dade Federal do Amazonas, Av.
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Animal Species of North Carolina 2020

    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Animal Species of North Carolina 2020

    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Animal Species of North Carolina 2020 Hickory Nut Gorge Green Salamander (Aneides caryaensis) Photo by Austin Patton 2014 Compiled by Judith Ratcliffe, Zoologist North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Animal Species of North Carolina 2020 Compiled by Judith Ratcliffe, Zoologist North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate. The list is published periodically, generally every two years.
  • Trichoptera: Hydroptilidae) from California, USA, with Its Phylogenetic and Taxonomic Implications

    Trichoptera: Hydroptilidae) from California, USA, with Its Phylogenetic and Taxonomic Implications

    Zootaxa 3620 (4): 589–595 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2013 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3620.4.8 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5F89FC52-2EEB-4810-BBDF-C817DA76C19E Larva of Nothotrichia shasta Harris & Armitage (Trichoptera: Hydroptilidae) from California, USA, with its phylogenetic and taxonomic implications KATHERINE A. PARYS1 & STEVEN C. HARRIS2 1USDA-ARS, Southern Insects Management Research Unit, 141 Experiment Station Road, Stoneville, MS 38776. E-mail:[email protected] 2Department of Biology, Clarion University, Clarion, PA 16214. E-mail:[email protected] Abstract Nothotrichia Flint 1967 is a small genus of infrequently collected microcaddisflies known from Chile and Brazil in South America, Costa Rica in Central America, and the United States in North America. Previously known only from adult specimens, we provide the first description and illustration of a larva in the genus, the larva of N. shasta from California, USA. We provide characters to separate Nothotrichia from other similar genera and an updated key to larval Hydroptilidae modified from that of Wiggins (1996). Larval characters provide additional evidence for the phylogeny and classification of the genus, which we now place tentatively in tribe Ochrotrichiini (subfamily Hydroptilinae). Key words: caddisflies, microcaddisflies, United States Introduction The genus Nothotrichia was erected by Flint (1967) for N. illiesi in Chile. A second species, N. cautinensis, also from Chile was added by Flint in 1983. The genus was thought to be Neotropical in distribution until a third species, N. shasta, was described from California, USA, by Harris and Armitage (1997).
  • Trichoptera: Hydropsychidae) from Alabama, with Additional State Records for the Curvipalpia by Paul K

    Trichoptera: Hydropsychidae) from Alabama, with Additional State Records for the Curvipalpia by Paul K

    BULLETIN ALABAMA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY The scientific publication of the Alabama Museum of Natural History. Richard L. Mayden, Editor, John C. Hall, Managing Editor. BULLETIN ALABAMA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY is published by the Alabama Museum of Natural History, a unit of The University of Alabama. The BULLETIN succeeds its predecessor, the MUSEUM PAPERS, which was terminated in 1961 upon the transfer of the Museum to the University from its parent organization, the Geological Survey of Alabama. The BULLETIN is devoted primarily to scholarship and research concerning the natural history of Alabama and the Midsouth. It appears irregularly in consecutively numbered issues. Communication concerning manuscripts, style, and editorial policy should be addressed to: Editor, BULLETIN ALABAMA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY, The University of Alabama, Box 870340, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0340; Telephone (205) 348-7550. Prospective authors should examine the Notice to Authors inside the back cover. Orders and requests for general information should be addressed to Managing Editor, BULLETIN ALABAMA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY, at the above address. Numbers may be purchased individually; standing orders are accepted. Remittances should accompany orders for individual numbers and be payable to The University of Alabama. The BULLETIN will invoice standing orders. Library exchanges may be handled through: Exchange Librarian, The University of Alabama, Box 870266, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0340. When citing this publication, authors are requested to use the following abbreviation: Bull. Alabama Mus. Nat. Hist. ISSN: 0196-1039 Copyright 1991 by The Alabama Museum of Natural History Price this number: $4.00 Cover Photo: Malcolm Pierson })Il{ -w-~ p ..~ ...- ~. ~O~ ALABAMA MUSEUM of Natural History • DJilll e[JlIrn Number 11 September 15, 1991 A New Species of Hydropsyche (Trichoptera: Hydropsychidae) from Alabama, with Additional State Records for the Curvipalpia by Paul K.
  • Distribution and Phylogenetic Diversity of Anopheles Species in Malaria

    Distribution and Phylogenetic Diversity of Anopheles Species in Malaria

    Escobar et al. Parasites Vectors (2020) 13:333 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04203-1 Parasites & Vectors RESEARCH Open Access Distribution and phylogenetic diversity of Anopheles species in malaria endemic areas of Honduras in an elimination setting Denis Escobar, Krisnaya Ascencio, Andrés Ortiz, Adalid Palma and Gustavo Fontecha* Abstract Background: Anopheles mosquitoes are the vectors of malaria, one of the most important infectious diseases in the tropics. More than 500 Anopheles species have been described worldwide, and more than 30 are considered a public health problem. In Honduras, information on the distribution of Anopheles spp. and its genetic diversity is scarce. This study aimed to describe the distribution and genetic diversity of Anopheles mosquitoes in Honduras. Methods: Mosquitoes were captured in 8 locations in 5 malaria endemic departments during 2019. Two collection methods were used. Adult anophelines were captured outdoors using CDC light traps and by aspiration of mosquitoes at rest. Morphological identifcation was performed using taxonomic keys. Genetic analyses included the sequencing of a partial region of the cytochrome c oxidase 1 gene (cox1) and the ribosomal internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2). Results: A total of 1320 anophelines were collected and identifed through morphological keys. Seven Anopheles species were identifed. Anopheles albimanus was the most widespread and abundant species (74.02%). To confrm the morphological identifcation of the specimens, 175 and 122 sequences were obtained for cox1 and ITS2, respec- tively. Both markers confrmed the morphological identifcation. cox1 showed a greater nucleotide diversity than ITS2 in all species. High genetic diversity was observed within the populations of An.