DOCSLIB.ORG

Mountstuart Elphinstone in South Asia: Pioneer of British Colonial Rule'

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mountstuart Elphinstone in South Asia: Pioneer of British Colonial Rule' H-Asia Farooqui on Hanifi, 'Mountstuart Elphinstone in South Asia: Pioneer of British Colonial Rule' Review published on Monday, August 3, 2020 Shah Mahmoud Hanifi, ed. Mountstuart Elphinstone in South Asia: Pioneer of British Colonial Rule. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019. Illustrations. 424 pp. $60.00 (cloth),ISBN 978-0-19-091440-0. Reviewed by Amar Farooqui (University of Delhi)Published on H-Asia (August, 2020) Commissioned by Sumit Guha (The University of Texas at Austin) Printable Version: http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showpdf.php?id=54713 Elphinstone in South Asia Mountstuart Elphinstone belonged to the “first generation” of colonial administrators who played an important role in British imperial expansion and consolidation in India in the early nineteenth century. During the latter phase of his career, he was instrumental in bringing about the downfall of the Maratha ruler Baji Rao II and ensuring colonial ascendancy in western India. This is the role for which he is better known. There is a brief episode that belongs to the earlier phase of his career—an errand that took him to Peshawar to seek an audience with Shah Shuja. One outcome of the trip was his first major published work, An Account of the Kingdom of Caubul (1815), which was to establish his reputation as a serious observer of oriental societies. Shah Mahmoud Hanifi notes that this work “has received far less scholarly attention and interrogation” than many of the “other textual products of his [East India] Company service in India” (p. 5). Hanifi has brought together fourteen essays on the broad theme of Elphinstone and his era. Almost ten of these focus on the Kingdom of Caubul and its afterlife. Two contributions deal with the Bombay presidency and the history of the Marathas. Lynn Zastoupil’s essay is a reappraisal of some of the educational initiatives of Elphinstone in western India. He argues that the impact of Romantic trends in German thought and Scottish cultural nationalism on his ideas might perhaps explain the benign nature of his endeavors in this field. It would have been worthwhile to have considered the long-term implications that his stress on cultural nationalism had on the articulation of nationalist ideologies in Maharashtra. Spencer Leonard brings out the contradictions inherent in James Grant Duff’s “historiographical enterprise,” History of the Mahrattas (1826), which failed “not because the work was frankly liberal ... but because it was insufficiently so” since it could not have possibly criticized the policies of the East India Company (EIC) (p. 201). The revival, since the 1970s, of interest in Elphinstone’s account of the Kabul kingdom, its anthropological aspects in particular, reflected Western political concerns about the leftward shift in Afghanistan. Louis Dupree, “the leading American authority on Afghanistan during the Cold War,” commented around that time that “writers on Afghanistan have either copied Elphinstone or copied those who have copied Elphinstone” (p. 8). We may well lament this state of affairs in Western Citation: H-Net Reviews. Farooqui on Hanifi, 'Mountstuart Elphinstone in South Asia: Pioneer of British Colonial Rule'. H-Asia. 08-03-2020. https://networks.h-net.org/node/22055/reviews/6303819/farooqui-hanifi-mountstuart-elphinstone-south-asia-pioneer-british Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 1 H-Asia scholarship on a country that has known few moments of peace in the past two centuries and that is allegedly unable to escape ethnic strife. Timothy Nunan’s incisive “The Soviet Elphinstone” makes out a strong case for using the valuable insights of Soviet scholarship which showed an awareness that “state power in Afghanistan can only be understood imperfectly through the lens of ethnicity” (p. 297). As the EIC settled down to govern territories it had conquered in eastern and southern India it harnessed the energies of young civil and military officials to put in place a mechanism to gather and process information that would allow it to comprehend the society it was claiming to govern. The emergence of the company as a major, if not yet the preeminent, power in the subcontinent after the final defeat of Tipu Sultan, ruler of Mysore in 1799, propelled its aggressive expansionist drive in the subsequent decades. A necessary precondition for furthering its agenda was the acquisition of adequate knowledge of regions in the vicinity of the EIC’s domain, especially to gauge their vulnerability. Following the establishment of British authority over Delhi and its environs in 1803, the city could be used as an intelligence outpost. This is when the systematic flow of information about Panjab and the northwestern parts of the Indian subcontinent commenced. Exaggerated fears of a possible French (or even Russian) foray into this quarter provided the pretext for launching full- fledged missions, which, though ostensibly of a diplomatic character, were meant to gather information about the lands to which the respective missions were dispatched. Elphinstone was sent to the “Kingdom of Kabul (Caubul),” Charles Metcalfe to Panjab, and John Malcolm to Iran (on his third mission to the Qajar court). In the words of Victor Kiernan, “Men who had been in India longer than Lord Minto (governor-general, 1807-10) may have guessed that sending out diplomats would lead to sending out armies.”[1] It is well known that colonial ethnographic classifications played havoc with the societies on which these were imposed. Thus, “Afghan” became an umbrella term for the diverse ethnic groups inhabiting the truncated Durrani kingdom, which was labeled “Afghaunistaun”/Afghanistan. This appellation has survived. Mahmoud Hanifi, Jamil Hanifi, Jonathan Lee, and Elisabeth Leake have in their essays underlined the problem of extending the term to denote inhabitants of the entire kingdom. After all, Elphistone’s own familiarity was confined to southeastern Afghanistan. Additionally, the Afghan-Pathan elision, which Lease draws attention to, remains an unresolved question for various reasons. We need to make a distinction between western and eastern Afghans. The latter were/are frequently referred to as Pathans. In late colonial classification, Pathans were subdivided into highland Pathans of the inaccessible (and presumably ungovernable) Sulaiman Mountains and Pathans of Peshawar and its countryside. The problem of nomenclature was further compounded by the demand, after 1947, for a separate “Pakhtunistan,” which would be the homeland of the Pashto-speaking eastern Afghans, living east of the Durand Line. It should be borne in mind that Peshawar, the winter capital of the Kabul kingdom, was lost to the Sikh kingdom ruled by Ranjit Singh, and would never again be part of Afghanistan. Elphinstone’s references to Ahmad Shah Durrani’s diwan (collected poems) comprising his Pashto verses were intended to highlight the importance of the language as a marker of Afghan identity as symbolized by the Durrani rulers. On the other hand, the archival material that formed the basis of Kingdom of Caubul, and that has been consulted by Mahmoud Hanifi, would suggest that Citation: H-Net Reviews. Farooqui on Hanifi, 'Mountstuart Elphinstone in South Asia: Pioneer of British Colonial Rule'. H-Asia. 08-03-2020. https://networks.h-net.org/node/22055/reviews/6303819/farooqui-hanifi-mountstuart-elphinstone-south-asia-pioneer-british Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 2 H-Asia Elphinstone was not entirely convinced of the authenticity of thediwan . Colonial officials of the twentieth century, such as Olaf Caroe, observed that “many Durranis do not even speak or understand Pashto” (p. 316). In all fairness to Elphinstone, given his extremely superficial interaction with Shah Shuja’s courtiers, most of whom were pursuing the interests of their own factions in representing or misrepresenting the kingdom to the British, the ambiguities of the two labels, Afghan and Pathan, should not surprise us. Lee’s essay explores the largely ignored Turkic elements of the Durrani state. He traces these to the historical connections that the Durrani (the name adopted by Ahmad Shah for his tribe, Abdali) had with the Safavid dynasty of Iran. The rise of the Saddozai clan, to which Ahmad Shah belonged, to preeminence may be attributed to this connection. Even more relevant is the place occupied by the Shi‘a Qizilbash in the Durrani state: the Qizilbash were of Turkic origin. They were the mainstay of its military power and also constituted the core of its bureaucratic apparatus. The sidelining of Durrani chiefs and the appointment of Abu’l Hasan Khan Qizilbash (referred to as Meer Abool Hussun Khaun) as mehmandar (official deputed to attend on a guest) to the Elphinstone mission resulted in much resentment. This was a very high honor, and the nuances of the factional tussles it caused were not grasped by members of the delegation. Elphinstone mistook the Qizilbash to be “Persians.” The confusion is likely to have resulted from the Persian influences that he discerned in his conversations with Shah Shuja’s entourage. Jamil Hanifi, whose essay looks at how these influences shaped the ethnographic material available in Kingdom of Caubul, remarks that “virtually all the ethnographic information received by Elphinstone was through Persian linguistic filters” (p. 56). Incidentally, Shah Shuja himself did not speak Pashto. It would have been easy
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mountstuart Elphinstone: an Anthropologist Before Anthropology
    Mountstuart Elphinstone Mountstuart Elphinstone in South Asia: Pioneer of British Colonial Rule Shah Mahmoud Hanifi Print publication date: 2019 Print ISBN-13: 9780190914400 Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2019 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190914400.001.0001 Mountstuart Elphinstone An Anthropologist Before Anthropology M. Jamil Hanifi DOI:10.1093/oso/9780190914400.003.0003 Abstract and Keywords During 1809, Mountstuart Elphinstone and his team of researchers visited the Persianate "Kingdom of Caubul" in Peshawar in order to sign a defense treaty with the ruler of the kingdom, Shah Shuja, and to collect information for use by the British colonial government of India. During his four-month stay in Peshawar, and subsequent two years research in Poona, India, Elphinstone collected a vast amount of ethnographic information from his Persian-speaking informants, as well as historical texts about the ethnology of Afghanistan. Some of this information provided the material for his 1815 (1819, 1839, 1842) encyclopaedic "An Account of the Kingdom of Caubul" (AKC), which became the ethnographic bible for Euro-American writings about Afghanistan. Elphinstone's competence in Farsi, his subscription to the ideology of Scottish Enlightenment, the collaborative methodology of his ethnographic research, and the integrity of the ethnographic texts in his AKC, qualify him as a pioneer anthropologist—a century prior to the birth of the discipline of anthropology in Europe. Virtually all Euro-American academic and political writings about Afghanistan during the last two-hundred years are informed and influenced by Elphinstone's AKC. This essay engages several aspects of the ethnological legacy of AKC. Keywords: Afghanistan, Collaborative Research, Ethnography, Ethnology, National Character For centuries the space marked ‘Afghanistan’ in academic, political, and popular discourse existed as a buffer between and in the periphery of the Persian and Persianate Moghol empires.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Modern Maharashtra (1818-1920)
    1 1 MAHARASHTRA ON – THE EVE OF BRITISH CONQUEST UNIT STRUCTURE 1.0 Objectives 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Political conditions before the British conquest 1.3 Economic Conditions in Maharashtra before the British Conquest. 1.4 Social Conditions before the British Conquest. 1.5 Summary 1.6 Questions 1.0 OBJECTIVES : 1 To understand Political conditions before the British Conquest. 2 To know armed resistance to the British occupation. 3 To evaluate Economic conditions before British Conquest. 4 To analyse Social conditions before the British Conquest. 5 To examine Cultural conditions before the British Conquest. 1.1 INTRODUCTION : With the discovery of the Sea-routes in the 15th Century the Europeans discovered Sea route to reach the east. The Portuguese, Dutch, French and the English came to India to promote trade and commerce. The English who established the East-India Co. in 1600, gradually consolidated their hold in different parts of India. They had very capable men like Sir. Thomas Roe, Colonel Close, General Smith, Elphinstone, Grant Duff etc . The English shrewdly exploited the disunity among the Indian rulers. They were very diplomatic in their approach. Due to their far sighted policies, the English were able to expand and consolidate their rule in Maharashtra. 2 The Company’s government had trapped most of the Maratha rulers in Subsidiary Alliances and fought three important wars with Marathas over a period of 43 years (1775 -1818). 1.2 POLITICAL CONDITIONS BEFORE THE BRITISH CONQUEST : The Company’s Directors sent Lord Wellesley as the Governor- General of the Company’s territories in India, in 1798.
    [Show full text]
  • “No Longer Merchants, but Sovereigns of a Vast Empire”: the Writings of Sir John Malcolm and British India, 1810 to 1833
    “No longer Merchants, but Sovereigns of a vast Empire”: The writings of Sir John Malcolm and British India, 1810 to 1833 By Jack Harrington Doctor of Philosophy 2009 University of Edinburgh i I declare that the following thesis is entirely my own work ......................................................................................................... ii Contents Abstract iv List of Abbreviations v Acknowledgements vi Introduction 1 Analysing Sir John Malcolm as an ideologue of the British empire 16 Structure and aims of the thesis 21 Chapter One: Sir John Malcolm and the British Empire in India 26 Chapter Two: The Political History of India and the creation of an historiography of imperial conquest 59 Acting in History: “Send Malcolm!” 60 The political context for the Sketch of the Political History of India 70 The Sketch of the Political History of India as a book 79 Conclusion 96 Chapter Three: Sir John Malcolm and the History of Modern Asia 99 The Literary Society of Bombay, orientalism and information-gathering 100 The Sketch of the Sikhs 103 The History of Persia 115 Sir John Malcolm and Orientalism during the Napoleonic Wars 132 Conclusion 135 Chapter Four: Sir John Malcolm’s Memoir of Central India: The historic case for indirect rule 136 Sir John Malcolm and the post-war reconstruction of Central India 138 The Report on the Province of Malwa and the Memoir of Central India 146 The History of Malwa as a Hindu Province 147 “The anatomy of Central India” 166 Conclusion 172 Chapter Five: Sir John Malcolm and the Government of
    [Show full text]
  • History 2020-21
    History (PRE-Cure) April 2020 - March 2021 Visit our website www.sleepyclasses.com or our YouTube channel for entire GS Course FREE of cost Also Available: Prelims Crash Course || Prelims Test Series T.me/SleepyClasses Table of Contents Links to the videos on YouTube .................1 29.Constitution day .....................................28 1. Services Day ......................................2 30.Lingayats ..................................................28 2. Indian Civil Services ........................2 31.Guru Nanak Dev Ji .................................29 3. Harijan Sevak Sangh celebrates its 32.Annapurna Statue to come back to India foundation day .........................................4 30 4. COVID-19 infection spreads to vulnerable 33.Mahaparinirvana Diwas ......................31 tribal community in Odisha ..................4 34.Cattle, buffalo meat residue found in 5. Tata group to construct India's new Indus Valley vessels .................................33 parliament building. ................................5 35.Tharu Tribals ...........................................34 6. Onam .........................................................6 36.Hampi stone chariot now gets protective 7. Kala Sanskriti Vikas Yojana (KSVY) ..6 ring ...............................................................35 8. Tech for Tribals ........................................7 37.Gwalior, Orchha in UNESCO world 9. Chardham Project ..................................8 heritage cities list: MP Govt ..................36 10.Rare inscription
    [Show full text]
  • Neil Benjamin Edmonstone and the First Indian Imperialists, 1780-1820 Marla Karen Chancey
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2003 In the Company's Secret Service: Neil Benjamin Edmonstone and the First Indian Imperialists, 1780-1820 Marla Karen Chancey Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY HISTORY DEPARTMENT IN THE COMPANY'S SECRET SERVICE: NEIL BENJAMIN EDMONSTONE AND THE FIRST INDIAN IMPERIALISTS, 1780-1820 by MARLA KAREN CHANCEY A Dissertation submitted to the Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Fall Semester, 2003 The members of the Committee approve the dissertation of Marla Karen Chancey, defended on August 26, 2003. Bawa Satinder Singh Professor Directing Dissertation Patrick M. O'Sullivan Outside Committee Member Peter P. Garretson Committee Member Winston Lo Committee Member Richard L. Greaves Committee Member Approved: Neil Jumonville, Chair, Department of History Donald Foss, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences The Office of Graduate Studies has verified and approved the above named committee members. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT iv INTRODUCTION 1 1. ORIGINS, 1765-1783 4 2. SOCIETY AND IMPERIALISM IN OLD CALCUTTA: 1783-1788 17 3. "THE SPLENDOR AND MAJESTY": A SEASON IN HYDERABAD, 1788-1790 36 4. ASAF-UD-DAULA AND THE BRITISH, 1790-1794 56 5. POWER POLITICS IN AWADH, 1794-1797 73 6. THE DENOUEMENT, 1797-1799 89 7. WILD AMBITION: THE MASSACRES OF 1799 105 8. WAR IN MASQUERADE, 1799-1801 126 9. THE POMP AND THE POWER, 1802-1803 145 10.
    [Show full text]
  • South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal , Free-Standing Articles Shah Shuja’S ‘Hidden History’ and Its Implications for the Historiography of
    South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal Free-Standing Articles | 2012 Shah Shuja’s ‘Hidden History’ and its Implications for the Historiography of Afghanistan Shah Mahmoud Hanifi Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/samaj/3384 DOI: 10.4000/samaj.3384 ISSN: 1960-6060 Publisher Association pour la recherche sur l'Asie du Sud (ARAS) Electronic reference Shah Mahmoud Hanifi, « Shah Shuja’s ‘Hidden History’ and its Implications for the Historiography of Afghanistan », South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal [Online], Free-Standing Articles, Online since 14 May 2012, connection on 03 May 2019. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/samaj/3384 ; DOI : 10.4000/samaj.3384 This text was automatically generated on 3 May 2019. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Shah Shuja’s ‘Hidden History’ and its Implications for the Historiography of ... 1 Shah Shuja’s ‘Hidden History’ and its Implications for the Historiography of Afghanistan Shah Mahmoud Hanifi Introduction: Locating Shuja in the first Anglo-Afghan war and in the context of the Pashtun domination hypothesis 1 The first Anglo-Afghan war of 1839-1842 sets the stage for this examination of Shah Shuja, and the large volume of literature on the war itself requires attention before we can turn to the Afghan monarch who is most intimately associated with the catastrophic colonial failure in Pashtun dominated Afghanistan. The first Anglo-Afghan war is well documented yet poorly understood. It is well documented from the diplomatic and military perspectives, but questions still remain about what is generally viewed as the most consequential defeat suffered by colonial forces in the history of the British Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Programme Mountstuart Elphinstone and the Historical
    Conference Programme Mountstuart Elphinstone and the Historical Foundations of Afghanistan Studies: Reframing Colonial Knowledge of the Indo-Persian World in the Post-Colonial Era Friday, 6 November - Djam Lecture Theatre, SOAS, 08.30-14.30 Saturday, 7 November - British Library Conference Centre, 09.00-17.00 Friday 6 November SOAS Djam Lecture Theatre, Russell Square, WC1H 0XG 08.30 AM – 14.30 PM 0830 - 0845 Opening Remarks 0845 - 1015 Panel A Introducing and Extending Elphinstone Ben Hopkins, George Washington University Elphinstone through the Ages Jonathan Lee Elphinstone’s ‘Kingdom of Caubul’, the Turkic world and the Durrani Dynasty Francesca Fuoli, SOAS Race, tribe and sovereignty in the late Nineteenth century reconfiguration of Anglo- Afghan relations 1015 – 1030 Tea/Coffee Break 1030 – 1200 Panel B Malcolm, Elphinstone and the Frontier Jack Harringon, LSE John Malcolm M. Jamil Hanifi, Michigan State University The Inheritance of Mountstuart Elphinstone’s 1809 visit to the ‘Kingdom of Caubul’ Zak Leonard, University of Chicago Ambiguous Fanaticism as Ethnographic Trope: a Deconstruction 1200 – 1300 Lunch 1300 - 1430 Keynote Address William Dalrymple William Fraser and Shah Shuja: A New Source for the Elphinstone Mission Afternoon: British Library Documents Session for Participants and Guests 1500 – 1545 Group 1 1545 – 1600 Handover between groups 1600 – 1645 Group 2 Saturday 7 November British Library Conference Centre 09.00 AM – 17.00 PM Bronte Room for panels Elliot Room for breaks, lunch, and reception 0900 – 1030 Panel A
    [Show full text]
  • Weak Ties in a Tangled Web? Relationships Between the Political Residents of the English East India Company and Their Munshis, 1798-1818
    1 Weak ties in a tangled web? Relationships between the Political Residents of the English East India Company and their munshis, 1798-1818 Weak ties in a tangled web Callie Wilkinson Wolfson College, University of Cambridge Cambridge, UK [email protected] Although historians have long recognized the important role which Indians played in the English East India Company’s operations, the focus has usually been on the mechanics of direct rule in ‘British’ India. Yet, the expertise of Indian cultural intermediaries was arguably even more important, as well as more contested, in the context of the Company’s growing political influence over nominally independent Indian kingdoms. This article examines the relationships between the East India Company’s political representatives (Residents) and their Indian secretaries (munshis) at Indian royal courts during a period of dramatic imperial expansion, from 1798 to 1818. The article considers how these relationships were conceptualized and debated by British officials, and reflects on the practical consequences of these relationships for the munshis involved. The tensions surrounding the role of the munshi in Residency business exemplify some of the practical dilemmas posed by the developing system of indirect rule in India, where the Resident had to decide how much responsibility to delegate to Indian experts better versed in courtly norms and practices, while at the same time maintaining his own image of authority and control. Although the Resident-munshi relationship was in many respects mutually beneficial, these relationships nevertheless spawned anxieties about transparency and accountability within the Company itself, as well as exciting resentments at court. Both Residents and munshis were required to negotiate between two political and institutional cultures, but it was the munshi who seems to have borne the brunt of the risks associated with this intermediary position.
    [Show full text]
  • Maharashtraatthebeginningofbrit
    Maharashtra at the beginning of British Rule in 19th century Introduction Maharashtra has the tradition of very old and ancient history. During ancient times, the dyansties like Satvahanas, Vakatakas, Chalukyas, Rashtrakutas, Shilharas ruled various parts of Maharashtra at different times. These dynasties had produced the famous rulers like Gautamiputra Satkarni, Hala (the king Hala belonging to Satvahana dynasty is credited with compiling the first book in Maharashtri Prakrit language. The title of the book was 'Gathasaptashati' or 'Gathasattasai'. According to experts the modern Marathi language has its roots in ancient Maharashtri Prakrit language), Pravarsen II (this king belonging to Vakataka dynasty composed a book titled 'Setubandh' or 'Ravanvaho' in Maharashtri Prakrit) Sarvasen (Sarvasena was also a Vakataka king who wrote 'Harivijay', a book in Maharashtri Prakrit. The Vakatakas came to power in Maharashtra after the Satvahanas), Pulkeshin II (He belonged to the Chalukya dynasty and had defeated king Harshavardhan, his powerful northern contemporary) and Aparaditya I (this Shilhara king was interested in music and Dharmashastras. He had written a commentary on Yajnyavalkya Smriti titled 'Apararka'). During medieval period, the most prominent dynasty which ruled over Maharashtra was the Yadava dynasty. During the Yadava rule great Marathi Bhakti Saint Dnyaneshwar wrote 'Dnyneshwari', a commentary on 'Bhagvad Gita' in Marathi language around 1290 CE. During the rule of Yadava king, Ramdevraya, Allauddin Khilji had attacked Devgiri (modern Aurangabad district in Maharashtra), the capital of Yadava Kings of Maharashtra. The Yadavas of Maharashtra claimed themselves to be decendants of 'Yadu' dynasty. Devout Hindus believe that Lord Krishna belonged to this mythological dynasty. Different parts of Maharashtra were subsequently ruled by the Sultans of Delhi (Delhi Sultanate) and Mughal Dynasty.
    [Show full text]
  • Poona in Bygone Days
    Hiss . GIFT OF HORACE W. CARPENTIER n SHIVAJI, THE FOUNDER OF THE. MARATIIA EMPIRE. _ POONA IN BYGONE DAYS BY RAO BAHADUR D. B. PARASN1S Author of " Mahablesrnvar," etc. "• 1)- iaV2>~..l»- -s. BOMBAY THE TIMES PRESS 1921 f t % , , • 'I ' * « , ' • f ' ' f f » I • Ca^pt^fi THIS BOOK is RESPECTFULLY DEDICATED TO HIS EXCELLENCY THE RIGHT HON'bLE SIR GEORGE LLOYD, G.C.I.E., D.S.O., GOVERNOR OF EOMBAY, WITH HIS GRACIOUS PERMISSION, 498023 CONTENTS Chapter. Page. I. SlIANWAR WADA 1 II. Parvati and its Temples . 28 III. The Sangam oe the British Eesidency 45 IV. Sindia's Chhatri 65 V. POONA AND ITS EuLEES . 75 VI. Poona Police—Ghashiram Kotwal 93 VII. Festivals, Sports and Amusements. 112 . LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Shivaji, the founder of the Maratha Empire . Frontispiece. Facing Ganpati Rang-Mahal—Peshwa s Darbar Page. in 1790 1 Ganpati Procession 9 Sawai Madhavrao Peshwa and his Minister Nana Phadnavis . 21 Poona in 1800 29 Sir Charles Malet 45 Nuruddin Husseinkhan 55 Mahadji Sindia 65 Sir Mountstuart Elphinstone , 70 Nana Phadnavis 87 Sawai Madhavrao taking Lance Exercises 122 The Peshwa's Menagerie 130 PREFACE The keen interest now-a-days shown in histori- cal research and old monuments by European and Indian scholars alike has encouraged me to collect information about Poona and its his- torical sites from all available sources. In addi- tion to material taken from unpublished old records I have culled extracts from old and rare books which possess peculiar interest —some of the extracts being the writings of great men, such as Elphinstone, Malcolm, Price.
    [Show full text]
  • I. Loot* Read 24 November 2017
    1 TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL HISTORICAL SOCIETY PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS By Margot C. Finn MATERIAL TURNS IN BRITISH HISTORY: I. LOOT* READ 24 NOVEMBER 2017 ABSTRACT. This address explores the writing of history in Britain during the Georgian and Victorian eras, arguing for the need both to trace British historiographical genealogies along routes that extend from Europe to the Indian subcontinent and to acknowledge the importance of material histories for this evolution. Focusing on military men who served the East India Company during the Third Anglo-Maratha and Pindari War (1817–1818), it examines the entangled histories of material loot, booty and prize on the one hand, and archival and history-writing practices developed by British military officers, on the other. Active in these military campaigns and in post-conflict administration of conquered territories, a cadre of Company officers (assisted by ‘native’ interlocutors trained in Indian historical traditions) elaborated historical practices that we more conventionally associate with the Rankean historiographical innovations of the Victorian era. The Royal Historical Society’s own history is shaped by these cross-cultural material encounters. In his presidential address of 2009, Colin Jones noted that most of his predecessors at the helm of the Royal Historical Society had been English historians, and had chosen to frame their four successive annual lectures around ‘the state of a key issue or else to offer a synthesis in regard to some knotty problem or major theme in, usually, English history’. His 2 approach to the anniversary lectures, as a French historian with eclectic tastes, was to range ‘more widely and more disparately than is the presidential custom’, so as to play to his strengths while following his interests.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Notes to Chapter Two Imagining a British India: History and the Reconstruction of Empire
    Koditschek, Liberalism, Imperialism and the Historical Imagination Supplementary Notes 2 Theodore Koditschek Supplementary Notes to Chapter Two Imagining a British India: history and the reconstruction of Empire Note to Reader: These supplementary notes consist primarily of extended references and explanations that were cut from the original book manuscript for reasons of space. In a few instances, however, they constitute more extended subordinate narratives (with accompanying references), which are related to the book’s themes, but were left out because they would have deflected from the central argument and analysis of the volume. These supplementary notes are coordinated to the footnote numbers for chapter two of Liberalism, Imperialism and the Historical Imagination: Nineteenth Century Visions of a Greater Britain, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011). 1. In a letter to John Morritt, dated October 11, 1812, Scott describes his meeting with “John Malcolm – the Persian envoy the Delhi Resident, then poet, the warrior the politician and the borderer.” “He is really a fine fellow,” Scott continues, “I met him at Dalkeith and we returned together [presumably to Abbotsford] he just left me after drinking his coffee. A fine time we had of it talking of Troy town and Babel and Persepolis and Delhi and Langholm and Burnfoot with all manner of episodes about Iskendiar Rustan and Johnnie Armstrong, Do you know that poem of Ferdusi’s must be beautiful. He read me some very splendid abstracts which he had himself translated. Should you meet him in London I have given him charge to be acquainted with you for I am sure you will like each other.” “To be sure,” he continued, “I know him little but I like his frankness and his sound ideas of morality and policy.” Herbert Grierson ed.
    [Show full text]