DOCSLIB.ORG

Exit Poll 1992

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Exit Poll 1992 Information on the Data File EXIT POLL 1992 A survey conducted during the voting period for the Czechoslovakian Parliamentary Elections in 1992 Data for the Czech Republic Prepared by Jindrich Krejci (e-mail: [email protected]) Sociological Data Archive, Social Trends Project Institute of Sociology of the Czech Academy of Sciences A. TECHNICAL INFORMATION Country: Czech Republic (in 1992 one of two members of the Czech and Slovak Federative Republic). Fieldwork Date: 1992; Friday, 5 June - Saturday, 6 June. Investigators: INFAS (Germany), IVVM (Institute for Public Opinion Research, Prague), and FACTUM (Prague) for Czechoslovak Television. Context of the Survey: The survey was conducted during the voting period for the Czechoslovakian Parliamentary Elections in 1992 in the Czech Republic with the aim to prepare election prognosis, which were aired on Czechoslovakian Television after the end of the elections on Saturday, 6 June. General Population: Voters who participated in the elections. (Every citizen of CSFR who had reached the age of 18 and was in CSFR on the polling day was entitled to vote.) Sampling Method: 1) Probability stratified sampling of the polling districts. 2) Systematic selection of respondents - random start and given sampling interval. N = 11 298 Response rate information is not provided because of the sampling method used. Fieldwork Method: Anonymous questionnaire administrated by respondent. Respondents were contacted outside voting stations of selected polling districts. Administrated questionnaires were collected into a copy of the ballot box. Weighting: The data should be weighted. There are two weights constructed on the bases of final results of the election to Czech National Council - wghtk on the base of results in districts; wghts on the base of results in the whole Czech Republic. 2 Czechoslovakian Parliamentary Elections in 1992: The former Czechoslovak federation (in 1992 Czech and Slovak Federative Republic - CSFR) had two members, the Czech Republic and the Slovak Republic. There were three Parliaments, the Federal Assembly, the Czech National Council and the Slovakian National Council. The Federal Assembly was bicameral, it consisted of the Chamber of People with proportional representation of two nations of the federation (150 members; 99 voted in the Czech Republic, 51 voted in Slovakia) and the Chamber of Nations with equal representation of both republics (150 members; 75 Czech Republic, 75 Slovakia). The elections in 1992 were held from Friday, 5 June to Saturday, 6 June to all 3 parliaments in the federation. Czech voters vote the representatives for the Chamber of People and the Chamber of Nations of the Federal Assembly and for the Czech National Council. The electoral system was based on the principle of proportional representation and was almost the same for all three parliaments. Parties, political movements or coalitions were to submit their lists of candidates for multi-mandate electoral regions. Voters voted first for a political subject (party, movement or coalition), then they could prefer individual deputies from the list using so-called priority vote (4 priority votes were the maximum). After the election into the first scrutiny only the parties and political movements with a minimum of 5 per cent and coalitions with no less than 7 per cent of votes in either the Czech Republic or Slovak Republic were admitted. Political subjects with 2 and more per cent were entitled to receive a state financial support for their activities. Deputies were elected for a term of four years. Official Results in %: Chamber of Chamber of Czech National People of the Nations of the Council Federal Assembly Federal Assembly ODS-KDS Coalition of Civic Democratic 33.9 33.4 29.7 Party and - Christian Democratic Party LB Left block - Communist Party of Boh. 14.3 14.5 14.1 and Moravia, Party of the Democratic Left CSSD Czechoslovak Social Democrats 7.7 6.8 6.5 SPR-RSC The Union for Republic - 6.5 6.4 6.0 Czechoslovak Party of Republicans KDU-CSL Christian Democratic Union – 6.0 6.1 6.3 Czechoslovak People‘s Party LSU Liberal-social Union 5.8 6.1 6.5 ODA Civic Democratic Alliance 4.9 4.1 5.9 OH Civic Movement 4.4 4.7 4.6 Others 16.5 17.9 20.4 Source: Volby do Federalniho shromazdeni a Ceske narodni rady 5. a 6. cervna 1992. Czech Statistical Office. Prague 1992. 3 B. INFORMATION ON VARIABLES ICISOKR Polling district number CASBL Block of time The Exit poll data were collected in 15 time blocks during the voting period. In the end of each block the computer center was contacted by interviewers and new data were recorded. SLFS92 Party voted by respondent to the Chamber of People of the Federal Assembly SNFS92 Party voted by respondent to the Chamber of Nations of the Federal Assembly CNR92 Party voted by respondent to the Czech National Council (Czech Republic national parliament) Question for SLFS92, SNFS92, CNR92 variables: (SLFS = Chamber of People of the Federal Assembly; SNFS = Chamber of Nations of the Federal Assembly; CNR = Czech National Council) Which party did you just vote for? ChP ChN CNA 01 Civic Democratic Alliance A01 B01 C01 03 Czechoslovak Social Democrats A03 B03 C03 04 The Movement for self-governing Moravia and A04 B04 C04 Silesia—Moravian National Union 05 Movement of pensioners for life securities A05 B05 C05 10 National socialist party- the Czechoslovak A10 B10 C10 national socialist party 13 Democrats 92 for common state A13 B13 C13 14 Party of republic and national democratic unity A14 B14 C14 15 The Hungarian Christian Democratic Movement- A15 B15 C15 Egyuttelés- Hungarian People‘s Party 17 Christian Democratic Union—Czech People‘s A17 B17 C17 Party 19 Party of Czechoslovak Entrepreneurs, A19 B19 C19 Shopkeepers and Farmers 21 Movement for social justice A21 B21 C21 22 Liberal- social Union A22 B22 C22 24 Civic movement A24 B24 C24 28 The Union for Republic – Czechoslovak Party of A28 B28 C28 Republicans 31 Club of Involved-Non-partymembers A31 B31 C31 32 Gypsies Civic Initiative A32 B32 C32 33 Left block – coalition of The Communist Party of A33 B33 C33 Bohemia and Moravia and The Party of the Democratic Left 38 Beer Friends Party A38 B38 C38 41 Independent Initiative A41 B41 C41 42 Coalition of Civic Democratic Party and - A42 B42 C42 Christian Democratic Party 4 SLFS90 Party voted by respondent to the Chamber of People of the Federal Assembly in the last elections in 1990 Question: Please try to remember which party you voted for in the 1990 parliamentary elections: 01 The party of freedom D01 02 The democratic party D02 03 The Czechoslovak national socialist party D03 04 The movement for the civic freedom D04 05 Public against violence D05 06 The free block D06 07 Civic forum D07 08 General people’s democratic party– The Union for Republic – D08 Czechoslovak Party of Republicans 09 The free cluster of interest groups in CR D09 10 The Communist Party of Czechoslovakia D10 11 The union of farmers and countryside D11 12 Együttélés – The Hungarian Christian Democratic Movement D12 13 Czechoslovak democratic forum D13 14 Gypsies D14 16 The Slovak national party D16 17 The Christian Democratic Movement D17 18 Green party D18 19 The movement for Czechoslovak understanding D19 20 The Movement for self-governing Moravia and Silesia—Moravian D20 National Union 21 Social democracy D21 22 Beer Friends Party D22 23 Christian Democratic Union D23 24 I wasn‘t entitled to vote D24 25 I didn‘t vote D25 SEX Sex of the respondent Question: E. Sex E1 Male E2 Female 5 ZAM Type of employment of the respondent Question: F. Employment F1 Worker F2 Other employment (for example, work in administrative, scientific, or technical fields if not simply workers) without higher education F3 Other employment with higher education F4 Agricultural work (private or cooperative) F5 Private business F6 Retired F7 Housewife F8 Student, pupil F9 Other VEKSK Age group of the respondent Question: G. Age G1 18 – 19 years G2 20 – 29 years G3 30 – 44 years G4 45 – 59 years G5 60 years or more NABOZ Religious denomination of the respondent Question: H. Religion H1 Atheist H2 Roman-Catholic H3 Protestant H4 Orthodox H5 other KRAJ Region Value Label 31 Prague 32 Central Bohemia 33 Southern Bohemia 34 Western Bohemia 35 Northern Bohemia 36 Eastern Bohemia 37 Southern Moravia 38 Northern Moravia 6 ZAST Type of area: rural - panel Value Label 1 rural 2 family houses, villas 3 rented apartment houses 4 prefabricated (panel) rented apartment houses UZEM Type of area: residential - industrial zone Value Label 1 residential 2 combined: residential and industrial 3 down town; business and service center STAVDF Type of area:condition of buildings in the area Value Label 1 good condition 2 slightly damaged 3 very damaged 4 desolated PRZAM Type of area: prevailing type of employment in the area Value Label 1 agriculture 2 industry 3 service 4 other STARDF Type of area: age of buildings in the area Value Label 1 < 1870 2 1870-1918 3 1919-1945 4 1946-1970 5 1971-1980 6 1981-now OPRVOL Type of area: number of entitled voters OKRES District OBEC Community WGHTK Weight Weight based on the official results of the election to Czech National Council in districts WGHTS Weight Weight based on the official results of the election to Czech National Council in the Czech Republic. 7 Frequencies: Computed from unweighted data ! - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CASBL Block of time Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 1692 15.0 15.0 15.0 2 1423 12.6 12.6 27.6 3 1114 9.9 9.9 37.4
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Constitution of the Czech Republic of 1992, 21 Hastings Const
    Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly Volume 21 Article 6 Number 4 Summer 1994 1-1-1994 The onsC titution of the Czech Republic of 1992 George E. Glos Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/ hastings_constitutional_law_quaterly Part of the Constitutional Law Commons Recommended Citation George E. Glos, The Constitution of the Czech Republic of 1992, 21 Hastings Const. L.Q. 1049 (1994). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_constitutional_law_quaterly/vol21/iss4/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Constitution of the Czech Republic of 1992 By GEORGE E. GLOS* Table of Contents I. Comments on and Evaluation of the Constitution of the Czech Republic of 1992 ................................. 1051 A. The Legislative' Power ... ........................... 1051 B. The Executive Power ............................... 1053 C. The Judicial Power .................................. 1054 D. Territorial Self-Government ........................ 1055 1. The Land System and the Regions System ..... 1055 2. The Future of Land Divisions .................. 1056 E. The Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms. 1057 II. Summary of Constitution of the Czech Republic ....... 1058 A. The Enactment ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Political Stability and the Division of Czechoslovakia
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 8-1996 Political Stability and the Division of Czechoslovakia Timothy M. Kuehnlein Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Kuehnlein, Timothy M., "Political Stability and the Division of Czechoslovakia" (1996). Master's Theses. 3826. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/3826 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. POLITICAL STABILITY AND THE DIVISION OF CZECHOSLOVAKIA by Timothy M. Kuehnlein, Jr. A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Department of Political Science Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan August 1996 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The completion of this project was both a tedious and rewarding experience. With the highest expectations for the style and content of the presentation, I have attempted to be as concise yet thorough as possible in the presentation and defense of the argument. The composition of this thesis entails nearly two years of diligent work outside of general course studies. It includes preliminary readings in Central and East European affairs, an extensive excursion throughout the Czech and Slovak republics with readings in the theory of political stability, the history and politics of Czecho­ slovakia, in addition to composing the text. My pursuit was driven by a passion for the topic, a quest for know­ ledge and understanding, and the argument's potential for continued development.
    [Show full text]
  • Devolution Or Deconstruction Czecho-Slovak Style
    Michigan Journal of International Law Volume 13 Issue 4 1992 Devolution or Deconstruction Czecho-Slovak Style Eric Stein University of Michigan Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjil Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, and the Constitutional Law Commons Recommended Citation Eric Stein, Devolution or Deconstruction Czecho-Slovak Style, 13 MICH. J. INT'L L. 786 (1992). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjil/vol13/iss4/2 This Essay is brought to you for free and open access by the Michigan Journal of International Law at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Journal of International Law by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DEVOLUTION OR DECONSTRUCTION CZECHO-SLOVAK STYLE Eric Stein * This essay is a part of a broaderstudy entitled "Post-communist Con- stitution-making: Confessions of a Comparatist" which focuses on Czechoslovakia. The present Czech and Slovak Federative Republic is a unique variant offederalism. It is composed of only two component units (shades of Leb- anon, Cyprus, perhaps Belgium), and it is seriously asymmetric: demo- graphically, there are twice as many Czechs and Moravians in the Czech Republic as there are Slovaks in the Slovak Republic; economically, the Czech area has been highly industrialized while Slovak industrialization has come much later and is less diversified; historically, the Czech lands have had a long tradition of politicaland cultural identity even as part of the Austro-HungarianEmpire, while the Slovaks remained under an op- pressive Hungarian dominance for a thousand years until the establish- ment of the Czechoslovak Republic in 1918.
    [Show full text]
  • Elections in Czechoslovakia
    102th CONGRESS Printed for the use of the 1st Session Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe ELECTIONS IN CZECHOSLOVAKIA JUNE 1992 A Report Prepared by the Staff of the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe ABOUT THE ORGANIZATION (OSCE) The Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe, also known as the Helsinki process, traces its origin to the signing of the Helsinki Final Act in Finland on August 1, 1975, by the leaders of 33 European countries, the United States and Canada. Since then, its membership has expanded to 55, reflecting the breakup of the Soviet Union, Czechoslovakia, and Yugoslavia. (The Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, Serbia and Montenegro, has been suspended since 1992, leaving the number of countries fully participating at 54.) As of January 1, 1995, the formal name of the Helsinki process was changed to the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE). The OSCE is engaged in standard setting in fields including military security, economic and envi- ronmental cooperation, and human rights and humanitarian concerns. In addition, it undertakes a variety of preventive diplomacy initiatives designed to prevent, manage and resolve conflict within and among the participating States. The OSCE has its main office in Vienna, Austria, where weekly meetings of permanent represen- tatives are held. In addition, specialized seminars and meetings are convened in various locations and periodic consultations among Senior Officials, Ministers and Heads of State or Government are held. ABOUT THE COMMISSION (CSCE) The Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE), also known as the Helsinki Commission, is a U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Czech Repulbic 96
    I. GENERAL INFORMATION I. GENERAL INFORMATION I.1 History The first signs of people living in what army and incorporated as a special auto- is today the Czech Republic are as old as nomous state into the German Empire. In 1.6 - 1.7 million years and were found ne- 1945, Czechoslovakia was liberated by ar Beroun in Central Bohemia. The first the Soviet and American armies. The Cze- Slavonic people came in the 5th and 6th choslovak state was restored without centuries. The first written references to Carpatho-Russia which joined the Soviet the Czechs, Prague, and regions of Bohe- Union. mia appeared in the 8th and 9th centu- In February 1948, the Communist ries. In about the year 870, the Czech party gained power (in a formal constitu- prince Borivoj was mentioned for the first tional way), and Czechoslovakia was under time. He came from Prague and belonged Soviet influence until 1989. After the to the House of Premysl, which later be- „Velvet Revolution“ in 1989, the democra- came the royal dynasty of Bohemia. This tic regime was restored. dynasty governed the Czech kingdom In response to the Slovak desire for until 1306. During the reign of the House greater self determination, a federal con- of Luxembourg (1310-1436), Bohemia stitution was introduced in 1968. Com- was the center of the so-called Holy West pletely controlled by the Communist Par- Roman Empire of German People and ty, the Czechoslovak Federation had not Prague became one of the cultural centers satisfied the legitimate aspirations of the of Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Government Structure in the New Slovak Republic, the Peter Kresak
    Tulsa Journal of Comparative and International Law Volume 4 | Issue 1 Article 2 9-1-1996 Government Structure in the New Slovak Republic, The Peter Kresak Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/tjcil Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Peter Kresak, Government Structure in the New Slovak Republic, The, 4 Tulsa J. Comp. & Int'l L. 1 (1996). Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/tjcil/vol4/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by TU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Tulsa Journal of Comparative and International Law by an authorized administrator of TU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TULSA JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE & INTERNATIONAL LAW Volume 4, No. 1 Fall 1996 THE GOVERNMENT STRUCTURE IN THE NEW SLOVAK REPUBLIC Peter Kresdk* I. INTRODUCTION: THE HISTORY The Constitution of the Slovak Republic (Constitution) went into effect on October 1, 1992, the day of its proclamation.' The decisive J.D., Ph.D; Associate Professor at Comenius University in Bratislava, Slovak Republic; Vice-director of the Institute of International Relations of Comenius University and adviser to the Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic; Member of editorial staff of PRAVNY OBZOR, a scientific law review in the Slovak Republic, and former contributor to the project "East Euro- pean Constitutional Law Review," organized by Chicago University School of Law; 1988 Fulbright Scholar, University of Virginia School of Law; 1991 Fellow, Salzburg Seminar in American Law and Legal Institutions; Nominated in 1990 by the Federal Assembly to the new- ly created Federal Constitutional Commission; Representative for the Czech and Slovak Federal Republic (CSFR) at the 1992 "Venice Commission," a constitutional advisory board to the Council of Europe; Nominated by the former President of the CSFR, Vaclav Havel, to the Con- stitutional Court of the CSFR.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Determination, Minority Rights, and Constitutional Accommodation: the Example of the Czech and Slovak Federal Republic
    Michigan Journal of International Law Volume 13 Issue 1 1991 Self-Determination, Minority Rights, and Constitutional Accommodation: The Example of the Czech and Slovak Federal Republic Claudia Saladin University of Michigan Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjil Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, International Law Commons, and the Rule of Law Commons Recommended Citation Claudia Saladin, Self-Determination, Minority Rights, and Constitutional Accommodation: The Example of the Czech and Slovak Federal Republic, 13 MICH. J. INT'L L. 172 (1991). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjil/vol13/iss1/7 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Michigan Journal of International Law at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Journal of International Law by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDENT NOTES SELF-DETERMINATION, MINORITY RIGHTS, AND CONSTITUTIONAL ACCOMMODATION: THE EXAMPLE OF THE CZECH AND SLOVAK FEDERAL REPUBLIC Claudia Saladin * Perhaps the greatest threat to establishment of stable democracies in Eastern Europe is ethnic tension.I Self-determination and the rights of minorities are especially important issues for these countries be- cause of their ethnically diverse populations. As the following discus- sion will demonstrate, the issues of self-determination and minority rights are closely related to one another and to the issue of democratic legitimacy. Using the example of current constitutional reform and debate in the Czech and Slovak Federal Republic (CSFR), this Note will describe the interrelationship of these issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Background of Economic Transition in the Czech Republic1
    Political Background of Economic Transition in the Czech Republic1 František Turnovec CERGE-EI Abstract This paper suggests a methodology for an analysis of the distribution of power in multi-party parliamentary bodies elected on the basis of a proportional electoral system. Concepts of the political spectrum and the power spectrum (based on game theoretical concepts of power indices) on a single left-right ideological dimension are used to analyze the situation in the Czech Republic after the 1992 general parliamentary election and after the separation of the former Czech and Slovak Federal Republic in 1993. The political and power spectrums in the Czech Republic are compared to analogical characteristics of the parliaments of the Slovak Republic, Poland and Russia. Abstrakt Práce navrhuje metodologii analýzy rozdeˇlení moci a vlivu v parlamentech se zastoupením více politických stran, volených na základeˇ proporcionálního volebního systému. Zavádí pojmy politického a mocenského spektra (založené na pojmech indexu˚ moci, známých z kooperativní teorie her) na jednoduchém "levo-pravém" ideologickém rozmeˇru a používá je k analýze situace v Cˇ eské republice po paramentních volbách v r. 1992 a po rozdeˇlení Cˇ SFR v r. 1993. Porovnává politické a mocenské spektrum v Cˇ eské republice s analogickými charakteristikami parlamentu˚ ve Slovenské republice, Polsku a Rusku. Keywords: Committees, Distribution of power, Multi-cameral committees, Paradoxes of power, Political spectrum, Power indices, Power spectrum, Voting rules. JEL Classification: D720, D790 1 I am grateful to Dan Berkowitz, Petr Fiala, Tomas Gal, Jacek Mercik, Jan Svejnar and Miroslav Vester for constructive comments on earlier drafts and for helpful discussions. Contents Introduction 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Center for Institutional Reform and the Informal Sector
    CENTER FOR INSTITUTIONAL REFORM AND THE INFORMAL SECTOR University of Maryland at College Park Center Office: IRIS Center, 2105 Morrill Hall, College Park, MD 20742 Telephone (301) 405-3110 l Fax (301) 405-3020 TRANSITION, CONSTITUTION-MAKING, AND SEPARATION IN CZECHOSLOVAKIA November 1994 Jon Elster Working Paper No. 145 This publication was made possible through support provided by the U.S. Agency for International Development, under Cooperative Agreement No. DHR-0015-A-00-0031-00. The views and analyses in the paper do not necessarily reflect the official position of the IRIS Center or the U.S.A.I.D. Author: Jon Elster, Oslo, Norway IRIS Summary Transition, constitution-making and separation in Czechoslovakia by Jon Elster This paper considers the constitutional developments in Czechoslovakia and the two successor states, the Czech and Slovak Republics. To understand these processes it is necessary to consider in some detail the break-up of the Czech and Slovak Republic, as it was called at the time of its dissolution. The failure to keep the country together was closely related to the failure to agree on a new federal constitution and on the division of power between the federation and the two member republics. When the latter became independent and set about writing new constitutions, their efforts were in multiple ways influenced and constrained by what had already taken place. The development of Czechoslovakia after 1989 belongs to two overlapping sets of events. On the one hand, Czechoslovakia, like all the Communist countries in this part of the world, saw an astonishingly rapid downfall of communism and the introduction of a democratic regime.
    [Show full text]
  • Czecho ? Slovakia: Constitutional Disappointments Katarina Mathernova
    American University International Law Review Volume 7 | Issue 3 Article 3 1992 Czecho ? Slovakia: Constitutional Disappointments Katarina Mathernova Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/auilr Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Mathernova, Katarina. "Czecho ? Slovakia: Constitutional Disappointments." American University International Law Review 7, no. 3 (1992): 471-501. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington College of Law Journals & Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in American University International Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CZECHO ? SLOVAKIA: CONSTITUTIONAL DISAPPOINTMENTS Katarina Mathernoval INTRODUCTION People often view the Czech and Slovak Federative Republic (CSFR), Hungary, and Poland jointly as being countries of the former Eastern bloc most likely to achieve democratic political and market ec- onomic reform. The recent constitutional developments of these three countries do possess some similar traits - all three have striven to re- instate the rule of law, create new democratic structures, protect fun- damental rights and freedoms, create a system of reliable checks and balances, and introduce a genuine judicial review. It is important to realize, however, that despite these similarities, the current constitu- tional debate in Czechoslovakia is fundamentally different from the de- bate in the other countries. The most fundamental difference is that Czechoslovakia is not ethni- cally homogeneous, while both Hungary and Poland are more or less ethnically homogeneous societies.2 In Poland, the Poles constitute ap- proximately ninety-five percent; in Hungary, the Hungarians are ap- 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Czech Parliamentarism: the Issue Of
    www.ssoar.info Czech parliamentarism: the issue of stability, professionalization and accountability Mansfeldová, Zdenka Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Zur Verfügung gestellt in Kooperation mit / provided in cooperation with: Hannah-Arendt-Institut für Totalitarismusforschung e.V. an der TU Dresden Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Mansfeldová, Z. (2007). Czech parliamentarism: the issue of stability, professionalization and accountability. Totalitarismus und Demokratie, 4(1), 103-118. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-310976 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Deposit-Lizenz (Keine This document is made available under Deposit Licence (No Weiterverbreitung - keine Bearbeitung) zur Verfügung gestellt. Redistribution - no modifications). We grant a non-exclusive, non- Gewährt wird ein nicht exklusives, nicht übertragbares, transferable, individual and limited right to using this document. persönliches und beschränktes Recht auf Nutzung dieses This document is solely intended for your personal, non- Dokuments. Dieses Dokument ist ausschließlich für commercial use. All of the copies of this documents must retain den persönlichen, nicht-kommerziellen Gebrauch bestimmt. all copyright information and other information regarding legal Auf sämtlichen Kopien dieses Dokuments müssen alle protection. You are not allowed to alter this document in any Urheberrechtshinweise und sonstigen Hinweise auf gesetzlichen way, to copy it for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the Schutz beibehalten werden. Sie dürfen dieses Dokument document in public, to perform, distribute or otherwise use the nicht in irgendeiner Weise abändern, noch dürfen Sie document in public. dieses Dokument für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke By using this particular document, you accept the above-stated vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, aufführen, vertreiben oder conditions of use.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissolution of the Chamber of Deputies in the Czech Republic – the Origin and Essence of Applicable Constitutional Legislation 
    ISSN 1392–6195 (print) ISSN 2029–2058 (online) JURISPRUDENCIJA JURISPRUDENCE 2009, 3(117), p. 69–110 Dissolution OF THE CHAMBER OF DEPUTIES IN ThE CzECh REPUbLIC – ThE oRIgIN AND essence OF APPLICABLE CONSTITUTIONAL LEGislation Jan Kudrna Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Law, Department of Constitutional Law Nám. Curieových 7,116 40 Praha 1, Czech Republic Phone (+420) 221 005 356 E-mail [email protected] Received 25 May, 2009; accepted 25 September, 2009 Annotation. The constitutional system of the Czech Republic, which is established on the principles of a parliamentary form of government, takes into account the possibility of dissolving the Chamber of Deputies of the Parliament of the Czech Republic. The Chamber of Deputies is a chamber to which the government is accountable and this is the chamber in which the major part of the authority of Parliament is concentrated. Parliamentary systems have been also structured according to whether a certain amount of balance of power is preserved between parliament and the government. A typical charac- teristic of every parliamentary form of government is the possibility for a vote of confidence in the government by parliament, meaning a dependency of the government on the will of parliament. Some parliamentary systems counterbalance this relationship with a greater or lesser possibility for the government of dissolving that chamber of parliament, which votes confidence in it. This makes it possible for the government to be able to more significantly fulfil the role of political leader in a given country and it can actively initiate and form a political state. 1 This article was composed and translated with financial support within the framework of the scientific intent of MSM 0021620804.
    [Show full text]