DOCSLIB.ORG

Rebio Das Perobas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rebio Das Perobas PRESIDENTE DA REPÚBLICA Dilma Vana Rousseff VICE-PRESIDENTE DA REPÚBLICA Michel Miguel Elias Temer Lulia MINISTRA DE ESTADO DO MEIO AMBIENTE Izabella Mônica Vieira Teixeira PRESIDENTE DO INSTITUTO CHICO MENDES DE CONSERVAÇÃO DA BIODIVERSIDADE Rômulo José Fernandes Barreto Mello DIRETOR DE CRIAÇÃO E MANEJO DE UNIDADES DE CONSERVAÇÃO Ricardo José Soavinski COORDENADOR DE ELABORAÇÃO E REVISÃO DE PLANOS DE MANEJO Carlos Henrique Velasquez Fernandes CHEFE DA RESERVA BIOLÓGICA DAS PEROBAS Carlos Alberto Ferraresi De Giovanni Brasília, 2012 Equipe Técnica Supervisão e Revisão Carina Tostes Abreu / ICMBio – COMAN Carolina Fritzen / ICMBio – COMAN Coordenação Antonio Guilherme Cândido da Silva / ICMBio – Rebio das Perobas Equipe de planejamento Antonio Guilherme Cândido da Silva / ICMBio – Rebio das Perobas Carina Tostes Abreu / ICMBio – COMAN Carlos Alberto Ferraresi De Giovanni / ICMBio – Rebio das Perobas Carolina Fritzen / ICMBio – COMAN Deusdeti Jacson Ribeiro / ICMBio – Rebio das Perobas Edilene Oliveira de Menezes / ICMBio – COMAN Oficina de Diagnóstico Socioambiental (mediador) Mauro Vieira Baldini / Ibama – Superintendência do Mato Grosso Oficina de Planejamento Participativo (mediadora) Margarene Maria Lima Beserra / ICMBio - COMAN Oficina de Planejamento com o Conselho Consultivo (mediador) Carlos Alberto Ferraresi De Giovanni / ICMBio – Rebio das Perobas Equipe Técnica do levantamento de dados ambientais (coordenadores) Antonio Guilherme Cândido da Silva, MSc. / ICMBio Débora Cristina de Souza, PhD. / Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná Fernanda de Almeida Gurski, MSc. / ICMBio – Projeto aquaIguaçu Henrique Ortêncio Filho, PhD. / Universidade Estadual de Maringá Igor de Paiva Affonso, Biólogo / Universidade Estadual de Maringá Luiz dos Anjos, PhD. / Universidade Estadual de Londrina Marcelo Galeazzi Caxambu, PhD. / Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná Mariza Barion Romagnolo, PhD. / Universidade Estadual de Maringá Rosilene Luciana Delariva, PhD. / Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná Yara Moretto Bagatini, PhD. / Universidade Federal do Paraná Equipe de apoio Alana Pandolfo Jonatan Wilian da Silva Soares Alessandro Henrique de Oliveira MacLeod Letícia Monica Garcia Carlos Alberto de Oliveira Magalhães Jr. Luciana Signorelli Faria Lima Carlos Alberto Ferraresi De Giovanni Pedro Luiz Cazella Fogaça Daniele Klosinski Lourenço Priscilla Vieira Rocha Garbato Deusdeti Jacson Ribeiro Rosenildo Andrade Simões Eduardo Ribeiro da Cunha Sílvia Regina Ferreira Frank Marcos Sakyiama Thaisa Sala Michelan Jislaine Cristina da Silva Vagner Carlos Canuto João Luis Dequi Araújo Yolanda Luiza Ferreira de Oliveira da Silva Capa Fátima Feijó PLANO DE MANEJO DA RESERVA BIOLÓGICA DAS PEROBAS SUMÁRIO Introdução...................................................................................................................................................................1 Ficha Técnica da Unidade de Conservação.............................................................................................................4 ENCARTE 1 - CONTEXTUALIZAÇÃO DA UNIDADE DE CONSERVAÇÃO.............................................5 1.1. Enfoque Internacional.........................................................................................................................................6 1.2. Enfoque Federal...................................................................................................................................................8 1.3. Enfoque Estadual...............................................................................................................................................11 ENCARTE 2 – ANÁLISE REGIONAL................................................................................................................22 2.1. Descrição da região da Unidade de Conservação...........................................................................................23 2.2. Caracterização ambiental da Região...............................................................................................................24 2.3. Aspectos culturais e históricos..........................................................................................................................35 2.4. Uso e ocupação da terra....................................................................................................................................37 2.5. Características da população............................................................................................................................41 2.6. Visão da comunidade sobre a Unidade de Conservação...............................................................................46 2.7. Alternativas de desenvolvimento econômico sustentável para a Região.....................................................47 2.8. Legislações federal, estadual e municipais pertinentes..................................................................................48 2.9. Potencial de apoio à Unidade de Conservação...............................................................................................50 ENCARTE 3 – ANÁLISE DA UNIDADE DE CONSERVAÇÃO.....................................................................55 3.1. Informações Gerais............................................................................................................................................56 3.2. Caracterização Física e Biológica.....................................................................................................................59 3.3. Situação Fundiária.............................................................................................................................................92 3.4. Ocorrência de Fogo............................................................................................................................................92 3.5. Atividades Desenvolvidas..................................................................................................................................97 3.6. Atividades Conflitantes...................................................................................................................................101 3.7. Aspectos Institucionais....................................................................................................................................112 3.8. Declaração de Significância............................................................................................................................120 ENCARTE 4 – PLANEJAMENTO.....................................................................................................................122 4.1. Histórico do Planejamento.............................................................................................................................123 4.2. Avaliação Estratégica.....................................................................................................................................124 4.3. Objetivos específicos do manejo.....................................................................................................................128 4.4. Normas gerais da Reserva Biológica das Perobas........................................................................................129 4.5. Zoneamento.....................................................................................................................................................132 4.6. Quadro-síntese do zoneamento......................................................................................................................154 4.7. Programas de Manejo.....................................................................................................................................156 4.8. Estimativa de custos.........................................................................................................................................177 Referências..............................................................................................................................................................183 Lista de Siglas APP – Área de Preservação Permanente CDB – Convenção de Diversidade Biológica IAP – Instituto Ambiental do Paraná Iapar – Instituto Agronômico do Paraná Ibama – Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis IBGE – Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística ICMBio – Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade MMA – Ministério do Meio Ambiente PIB – Produto Interno Bruto Rebio – Reserva Biológica RL – Reserva Legal RPPN – Reserva Particular do Patrimônio Natural Semma – Secretaria Municipal de Meio Ambiente de Cianorte SNUC – Sistema Nacional de Unidades de Conservação UC – Unidade de Conservação ZA – Zona de Amortecimento ZOT – Zona de Ocupação Temporária ZP – Zona Primitiva ZR – Zona de Recuperação ZUE – Zona de Uso Extensivo ZUESP – Zona de Uso Especial Lista de Figuras Encarte 1 Figura 1.1. Reserva da Biosfera da Mata Atlântica, reconhecida pela Unesco, com a Reserva Biológica das 7 Perobas destacada pelo círculo vermelho. Figura 1.2. Distribuição das reservas biológicas federais por bioma, em unidades, em 2010. 11 Figura 1.3. Distribuição da área ocupada por reservas biológicas federais, por bioma, em 2010. 11 Encarte 2 Figura 2.1. Localização da Reserva Biológica das Perobas. 23 Figura 2.2. Distribuição das unidades fitogeográficas mais representativas do Estado do Paraná. 26 Figura 2.3. Mapa climático do Estado do Paraná, com a localização aproximada
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Erythrinidae
    FAMILY Erythrinidae Valenciennes, in Cuvier & Valenciennes, 1947 - trahiras [=Erythricthini, Erythroides, Hopliidi] Notes: Name in prevailing recent practice, Article 35.5 Erythricthini [Erythrichthini] Bonaparte 1835:[16] [ref. 32242] (subfamily) Erythrichthys [genus inferred from the stem, Article 11.7.1.1; corrected to Erythrichthini by Bonaparte 1837:[7] [ref. 32243]; senior objective synonym of Erythrinidae Valenciennes, 1847, but not used as valid after 1899] Érythroïdes Valenciennes, in Cuvier & Valenciennes, 1847:480 [ref. 4883] (family) Erythrinus [latinized to Erythrinidae by Richardson 1856:250 [ref. 3747], confirmed by Gill 1858:410 [ref. 1750] and by Cope 1872:257 [ref. 921]; considered valid with this authorship by Richardson 1856:250 [ref. 3747], by Gill 1893b:131 [ref. 26255] and by Sheiko 2013:44 [ref. 32944] Article 11.7.2; junior objective synonym of Erythrichthini Bonaparte, 1835, but in prevailing recent practice; Erythrinidae also used as valid by: McAllister 1968 [ref. 26854], Lindberg 1971 [ref. 27211], Géry 1972b [ref. 1594], Nelson 1976 [ref.32838], Shiino 1976, Géry 1977 [ref. 1597], Nelson 1984 [ref. 13596], Sterba 1990, Nelson 1994 [ref. 26204], Springer & Raasch 1995:104 [ref. 25656], Eschmeyer 1998 [ref. 23416], Malabarba et al. 1998 [ref. 23777], Reis et al. 2003 [ref. 27061], Nelson 2006 [ref. 32486], Buckup, Menezes & Ghazzi 2007, Oyakawa & Mattox 2009 [ref. 30225], Jacobina, Paiva & Dergam 2011 [ref. 31391]] Hopliidi Fowler, 1958b:9 [ref. 1470] (tribe) Hoplias GENUS Erythrinus Scopoli, 1777 - trahiras [=Erythrinus Scopoli [J. A.] (ex Gronow), 1777:449, Erythrichthys Bonaparte [C. L.], 1831:182, Erythrinus Gronow [L. T.], 1763:114, Hetererythrinus (subgenus of Erythrinus) Günther [A.], 1864:283, 284] Notes: [ref. 3990].
    [Show full text]
  • A New Myxozoan Species Henneguya Unitaeniata Sp. Nov. (Cnidaria
    Parasitology Research (2019) 118:3327–3336 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-019-06533-1 FISH PARASITOLOGY - ORIGINAL PAPER A new myxozoan species Henneguya unitaeniata sp.nov.(Cnidaria: Myxosporea) on gills of Hoplerythrinus unitaeniatus from Mato Grosso State, Brazil Letícia Pereira Úngari1 & Diego Henrique Mirandola Dias Vieira1 & Reinaldo José da Silva1 & André Luiz Quagliatto Santos2 & Rodney Kozlowiski de Azevedo3 & Lucia Helena O’Dwyer1 Received: 15 May 2019 /Accepted: 28 October 2019 /Published online: 15November 2019 # Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019 Abstract On the basis of morphological and molecular analyses, a new myxozoan parasite is described from the gills of the fish Hoplerythrinus unitaeniatus, collected in the municipality of Nova Xavantina, Mato Grosso State, Brazil. Plasmodia of Henneguya unitaeniata sp. nov. were oval and whitish and were found surrounded by collagen fibers forming plasmodia wall between gill filaments on the gill arch. The spores were ellipsoidal with two similar polar capsules. Morphometric analysis showed a total spore mean length of 23.8 ± 1.5 μm, spore body mean length of 14.5 ± 0.7 μm, caudal appendage mean length of 10.3 ± 1.4 μm,thicknessmeanlengthof4.3±0.3μm, polar capsule mean length of 4.2 ± 0.5 μm, polar capsule mean width of 1.8 ± 0.3 μm, spore mean width of 4.8 ± 0.4 μm, and 4–5 polar filament coils. Phylogenetic analysis showed Henneguya unitaeniata sp. nov. as a basal species in a subclade formed by myxozoans that parasitize bryconid fishes. Keywords Erythrinidae . Histopathology . Myxobolidae . Phylogeny . SSU rDNA Introduction H. cinereus Gill 1858, H.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rapid Biological Assessment of the Upper Palumeu River Watershed (Grensgebergte and Kasikasima) of Southeastern Suriname
    Rapid Assessment Program A Rapid Biological Assessment of the Upper Palumeu River Watershed (Grensgebergte and Kasikasima) of Southeastern Suriname Editors: Leeanne E. Alonso and Trond H. Larsen 67 CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL - SURINAME CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL GLOBAL WILDLIFE CONSERVATION ANTON DE KOM UNIVERSITY OF SURINAME THE SURINAME FOREST SERVICE (LBB) NATURE CONSERVATION DIVISION (NB) FOUNDATION FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT AND PRODUCTION CONTROL (SBB) SURINAME CONSERVATION FOUNDATION THE HARBERS FAMILY FOUNDATION Rapid Assessment Program A Rapid Biological Assessment of the Upper Palumeu River Watershed RAP (Grensgebergte and Kasikasima) of Southeastern Suriname Bulletin of Biological Assessment 67 Editors: Leeanne E. Alonso and Trond H. Larsen CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL - SURINAME CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL GLOBAL WILDLIFE CONSERVATION ANTON DE KOM UNIVERSITY OF SURINAME THE SURINAME FOREST SERVICE (LBB) NATURE CONSERVATION DIVISION (NB) FOUNDATION FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT AND PRODUCTION CONTROL (SBB) SURINAME CONSERVATION FOUNDATION THE HARBERS FAMILY FOUNDATION The RAP Bulletin of Biological Assessment is published by: Conservation International 2011 Crystal Drive, Suite 500 Arlington, VA USA 22202 Tel : +1 703-341-2400 www.conservation.org Cover photos: The RAP team surveyed the Grensgebergte Mountains and Upper Palumeu Watershed, as well as the Middle Palumeu River and Kasikasima Mountains visible here. Freshwater resources originating here are vital for all of Suriname. (T. Larsen) Glass frogs (Hyalinobatrachium cf. taylori) lay their
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights Contrasting Karyotype Evolution Among Congeneric Species
    de Oliveira et al. Molecular Cytogenetics (2015) 8:56 DOI 10.1186/s13039-015-0161-4 RESEARCH Open Access Comparative cytogenetics in the genus Hoplias (Characiformes, Erythrinidae) highlights contrasting karyotype evolution among congeneric species Ezequiel Aguiar de Oliveira1,2, Luiz Antônio Carlos Bertollo1, Cassia Fernanda Yano1, Thomas Liehr3 and Marcelo de Bello Cioffi1* Abstract Background: The Erythrinidae fish family contains three genera, Hoplias, Erythrinus and Hoplerythrinus widely distributed in Neotropical region. Remarkably, species from this family are characterized by an extensive karyotype diversity, with 2n ranging from 39 to 54 chromosomes and the occurrence of single and/or multiple sex chromosome systems in some species. However, inside the Hoplias genus, while H. malabaricus was subject of many studies, the cytogenetics of other congeneric species remains poorly explored. In this study, we have investigated chromosomal characteristics of four Hoplias species, namely H. lacerdae, H. brasiliensis, H. intermedius and H. aimara. We used conventional staining techniques (C-banding, Ag-impregnation and CMA3 -fluorescence) as well as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with minor and major rDNA and microsatellite DNAs as probes in order to analyze the karyotype evolution within the genus. Results: All species showed invariably 2n = 50 chromosomes and practically identical karyotypes dominated only by meta- and submetacentric chromosomes, the absence of heteromorphic sex chromosomes, similar pattern of C-positive heterochromatin blocks and homologous Ag-NOR-bearing pairs. The cytogenetic mapping of five repetitive DNA sequences revealed some particular interspecific differences between them. However, the examined chromosomal characteristics indicate that their speciation was not associated with major changes in their karyotypes.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolução Cromossômica Em Erythrinus Erythrinus (Characiformes, Erythrinidae)
    UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SÃO CARLOS CENTRO DE CIÊNCIAS BIOLÓGICAS E DA SAÚDE PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM GENÉTICA EVOLUTIVA E BIOLOGIA MOLECULAR Evolução Cromossômica em Erythrinus erythrinus (Characiformes, Erythrinidae). Citogenética Comparativa entre Cariomorfos. Nícolas Fernandes Martins SÃO CARLOS-SP 2013 UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SÃO CARLOS CENTRO DE CIÊNCIAS BIOLÓGICAS E DA SAÚDE PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM GENÉTICA EVOLUTIVA E BIOLOGIA MOLECULAR Evolução Cromossômica em Erythrinus erythrinus (Characiformes, Erythrinidae). Citogenética Comparativa entre Cariomorfos. Nícolas Fernandes Martins Dissertação de Mestrado apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Genética Evolutiva e Biologia Molecular do Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde da Universidade Federal de São Carlos – UFSCar, como parte dos requisitos necessários para a obtenção do título de Mestre em Genética Evolutiva e Biologia Molecular, sob orientação do Prof. Dr. Luiz Antonio Carlos Bertollo e co- orientação do Prof. Dr. Marcelo de Bello Cioffi. São Carlos 2013 Ficha catalográfica elaborada pelo DePT da Biblioteca Comunitária da UFSCar Martins, Nícolas Fernandes. M386ec Evolução cromossômica em Erythrinus erythrinus (Characiformes, Erythrinidae). Citogenética comparativa entre cariomorfos / Nícolas Fernandes Martins. -- São Carlos : UFSCar, 2013. 70 f. Dissertação (Mestrado) -- Universidade Federal de São Carlos, 2013. 1. Citogenética. 2. Cariomorfos. 3. Evolução cariotípica. 4. DNA repetitivo. 5. Marcadores genéticos. I. Título. CDD: 574.87322 (20a) DEDICATÓRIA O grande mentor desse trabalho é sem dúvida o prof. Dr. Luiz Antônio Carlos Bertollo. Com sua simplicidade e amor me acolheu e me deu essa oportunidade. A ele dedico este trabalho. Nosso planeta tão é privilegiado, com tantas tecnologias, fachadas cheias de luzes. Tudo muito bonito o que homem fez e está fazendo! Entretanto, quando olhamos a abundância das plantações, temos que parar e pensar quanta comida nós produzimos e porque temos ainda tanta fome nesse Brasil.
    [Show full text]
  • Check List of the Freshwater Fishes of Uruguay (CLOFF-UY)
    Ichthyological Contributions of PecesCriollos 28: 1-40 (2014) 1 Check List of the Freshwater Fishes of Uruguay (CLOFF-UY). Thomas O. Litz1 & Stefan Koerber2 1 Friedhofstr. 8, 88448 Attenweiler, Germany, [email protected] 2 Friesenstr. 11, 45476 Muelheim, Germany, [email protected] Introduction The purpose of this paper to present the first complete list of freshwater fishes from Uruguay based on the available literature. It would have been impossible to review al papers from the beginning of ichthyology, starting with authors as far back as Larrañaga or Jenyns, who worked the preserved fishes Darwin brought back home from his famous trip around the world. The publications of Nion et al. (2002) and Teixera de Mello et al. (2011) seemed to be a good basis where to start from. Both are not perfect for this purpose but still valuable sources and we highly recommend both as literature for the interested reader. Nion et al. (2002) published a list of both, the freshwater and marine species of Uruguay, only permitting the already knowledgeable to make the difference and recognize the freshwater fishes. Also, some time has passed since then and the systematic of this paper is outdated in many parts. Teixero de Mello et al. (2011) recently presented an excellent collection of the 100 most abundant species with all relevant information and colour pictures, allowing an easy approximate identification. The names used there are the ones currently considered valid. Uncountable papers have been published on the freshwater fishes of Uruguay, some with regional or local approaches, others treating with certain groups of fishes.
    [Show full text]
  • Hoplerythrinus Cinereus (A Fish, No Common Name) Ecological Risk Screening Summary
    Hoplerythrinus cinereus (a fish, no common name) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, August 2011 Revised, September 2018 Web Version, 12/20/2018 Photo: S. J. Raredon. Licensed under Creative Commons BY-NC-SA. Available: http://eol.org/data_objects/18133818. (September 2018). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Froese and Pauly (2018): “Central America: Island of Trinidad in Trinidad and Tobago.” Status in the United States This species has not been reported as introduced or established in the United States. There is no indication that this species is available in trade in the United States. The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission has listed Hoplerythrinus cinereus as a prohibited species. Prohibited nonnative species “are considered to be dangerous to the ecology and/or the health and welfare of the people of Florida. These species are not allowed to be personally possessed or used for commercial activities” (FFWCC 2018). Means of Introduction into the United States This species has not been reported as introduced or established in the United States. 1 Remarks Froese and Pauly (2018) list Erythrinus cinereus as a synonym of H. cinereus. This synonym was used in conjunction with the accepted scientific name in searching for information for this ERSS. 2 Biology and Ecology Taxonomic Hierarchy and Taxonomic Standing From ITIS (2018): “Kingdom Animalia Subkingdom Bilateria Infrakingdom Deuterostomia Phylum Chordata Subphylum Vertebrata Infraphylum Gnathostomata Superclass
    [Show full text]
  • Hoplerythrinus Unitaeniatus (Characiformes, Erythrinidae): Um Complexo De
    UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SÃO CARLOS CENTRO DE CIÊNCIAS BIOLÓGICAS E DA SAÚDE PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM GENÉTICA EVOLUTIVA E BIOLOGIA MOLECULAR / Hoplerythrinus unitaeniatus (Characiformes, Erythrinidae): um complexo de espécies. Estudos citogenéticos clássicos e moleculares Juliana de Fatima Martinez São Carlos 2014 UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SÃO CARLOS CENTRO DE CIÊNCIAS BIOLÓGICAS E DA SAÚDE PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM GENÉTICA EVOLUTIVA E BIOLOGIA MOLECULAR Hoplerythrinus unitaeniatus (Characiformes, Erythrinidae): um complexo de espécies. Estudos citogenéticos clássicos e moleculares Juliana de Fatima Martinez São Carlos 2014 UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SÃO CARLOS CENTRO DE CIÊNCIAS BIOLÓGICAS E DA SAÚDE PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM GENÉTICA EVOLUTIVA E BIOLOGIA MOLECULAR Hoplerythrinus unitaeniatus (Characiformes, Erythrinidae): um complexo de espécies. Estudos citogenéticos clássicos e moleculares Juliana de Fatima Martinez Dissertação apresentada ao programa de Pós- Graduação em Genética Evolutiva e Biologia Molecular do Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde da Universidade Federal de São Carlos - UFSCar, como parte dos requisitos necessários para a obtenção do título de Mestre em Genética Evolutiva e Biologia Molecular. Orientador: Prof. Dr. Orlando Moreira Filho Co-orientador: Prof. Dr. Roberto Laridondo Lui São Carlos 2014 Ficha catalográfica elaborada pelo DePT da Biblioteca Comunitária da UFSCar Martinez, Juliana de Fatima. M385hu Hoplerythrinus unitaeniatus (Characiformes, Erythrinidae) : um complexo de espécies. Estudos citogenéticos clássicos e moleculares / Juliana de Fatima Martinez. -- São Carlos : UFSCar, 2014. 113 f. Dissertação (Mestrado) -- Universidade Federal de São Carlos, 2014. 1. Citogenética de peixes. 2. Erythrinidae. 3. Diversidade cromossômica. 4. Marcadores genéticos. 5. Híbridos naturais. 6. DNA ribossômico. I. Título. CDD: 597.087322 (20a) Aos meus pais, Cassia e Geraldo.
    [Show full text]
  • Chromosomes As Tools for Discovering Biodiversity – the Case of Erythrinidae Fish Family
    8 Chromosomes as Tools for Discovering Biodiversity – The Case of Erythrinidae Fish Family Marcelo de Bello Cioffi1, Wagner Franco Molina2, Roberto Ferreira Artoni3 and Luiz Antonio Carlos Bertollo1 1Universidade Federal de São Carlos 2Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte 3Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa Brazil 1. Introduction Biodiversity or biological diversity is the diversity of life, extant or extinct. All of the biodiversity found on Earth today consists of many millions of distinct biological species and is the product of more than 4 billion years of evolution. Although the origin of life has not been correctly determined by science, some evidence suggests that life may already have been well-established only a few hundred million years after the formation of the Earth. Estimates of the number of extant global macroscopic species vary from 2 million to 100 million, with a best estimate of approximately 13–14 million, and the vast majority is represented by insects. However, biodiversity is not evenly distributed; rather, it varies greatly across the globe as well as within regions. A “biodiversity hotspot” can be defined as a region with a high level of endemic species, and while they can be found all over the world, the majority of them are forest areas, and most are located in the tropics (Myers, 1988). In fact, it is not a coincidence that the world’s biodiversity hotspots are also the centers of evolutionary change for numerous species. Evolution produces biodiversity, and in turn, a more diverse biological environment creates more selective pressures, which drive evolution. The biodiversity of a specific region is often measured by determining the number of species found there.
    [Show full text]
  • Erythrinus Erythrinus (No Common Name) Ecological Risk Screening Summary
    Erythrinus erythrinus (no common name) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, August 2011 Revised, November 2016 Web Version, 12/28/2017 Photo: Erling Holm. © FishWise Professional. Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA. Available: http://eol.org/data_objects/24183130. (November 2016). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Froese and Pauly (2016): “Central and South America: Amazon and Orinoco River basins [Brazil and Venezuela, respectively] and coastal rivers of the Guianas.” Status in the United States This species has not been reported in the United States. 1 Means of Introductions This species has not been reported in the United States. 2 Biology and Ecology Taxonomic Hierarchy and Taxonomic Standing From ITIS (2016): “Kingdom Animalia Subkingdom Bilateria Infrakingdom Deuterostomia Phylum Chordata Subphylum Vertebrata Infraphylum Gnathostomata Superclass Osteichthyes Class Actinopterygii Subclass Neopterygii Infraclass Teleostei Superorder Ostariophysi Order Characiformes Family Erythrinidae Genus Erythrinus Species Erythrinus erythrinus (Bloch and Schneider, 1801)” “Current Standing: valid” Size, Weight, and Age Range From Froese and Pauly (2016): “Max length: 20.0 cm SL male/unsexed; [Boujard et al. 1997]” Environment From Froese and Pauly (2016): “Freshwater; demersal; pH range: 5.6 - 7.8; dH range:? – 30.” “[…] 22°C - 26°C [Riehl and Baensch 1991, assumed to be recommended aquarium water temperature]” Climate/Range From Froese and Pauly (2016): “Tropical […]” 2 Distribution Outside the
    [Show full text]
  • A New Miniature Species of Priocharax (Teleostei: Characiformes: Characidae) from the Rio Madeira Drainage, Brazil, with Comments on the Adipose Fin in Characiforms
    70 (3): 417 – 433 © Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, 2020. 2020 A new miniature species of Priocharax (Teleostei: Characiformes: Characidae) from the Rio Madeira drainage, Brazil, with comments on the adipose fin in characiforms George M. T. Mattox 1, *, Camila S. Souza 2, Mônica Toledo-Piza 3, Ralf Britz 4 & Claudio Oliveira 2 1 Laboratório de Ictiologia de Sorocaba, Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal de São Carlos – campus Sorocaba, São Paulo, Brazil — 2 Departamento de Biologia Estrutural e Funcional, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Estadual Paulista – campus Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil — 3 Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil — 4 Museum of Zoology, Senckenberg Dresden, A. B. Meyer Building, 01109 Dresden, Germany — * Corresponding author; email: [email protected] Submitted June 5, 2020. Accepted July 24, 2020. Published online at www.senckenberg.de/vertebrate-zoology on August 11, 2020. Published in print on Q3/2020. Editor in charge: Uwe Fritz Abstract A new miniature species of the freshwater fsh genus Priocharax is described from the Rio Jamari, Rio Madeira drainage, Amazon basin. Priocharax varii sp. n. is the fourth species currently recognized in the genus and shares with the other three the presence of a conspicuous larval pectoral fn in adults, a fully toothed maxilla, a triangular pseudotympanum situated anterior to the ffth vertebra and a tiny size com- bined with a translucent body. The new species is diagnosed from congeners in having an adipose fn, a unique feature within Priocharax. Molecular identifcation of the new species and the other valid Priocharax species supports the morphological fndings.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes of the World
    Fishes of the World Fishes of the World Fifth Edition Joseph S. Nelson Terry C. Grande Mark V. H. Wilson Cover image: Mark V. H. Wilson Cover design: Wiley This book is printed on acid-free paper. Copyright © 2016 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. Published simultaneously in Canada. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750-8400, fax (978) 646-8600, or on the web at www.copyright.com. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, (201) 748-6011, fax (201) 748-6008, or online at www.wiley.com/go/permissions. Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with the respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be createdor extended by sales representatives or written sales materials. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation.
    [Show full text]