DOCSLIB.ORG

Forest Inventory and Analysis National Urban Fia Plot Field Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Forest Inventory and Analysis National Urban Fia Plot Field Guide FOREST INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS NATIONAL URBAN FIA PLOT FIELD GUIDE FIELD DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURES FOR URBAN FIA PLOTS SRS Version 7.01 FOREST SERVICE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE June 2016 National Urban FIA Plot Field Guide, Version 7.0 SRS Edition, Version 7.01, June 2016 Note to User: URBAN FIA Field Guide 7.0 is based on the National CORE Field Guide, Version 7.0. Data elements are national CORE unless indicated as follows: National CORE data elements that end in “+U” (e.g., x.x+U) have had values,codes, or text added, changed, or adjusted from the CORE program. Any additional URBAN FIA text for a national CORE data element is hi-lighted or shown as an "Urban Note". All URBAN FIA data elements end in “U” (e.g., x.xU). The text for an URBAN FIA data element is not hi- lighted and does not have a corresponding variable in CORE. URBAN FIA electronic file notes: o national CORE data elements that are not applicable in URBAN FIA are formatted as light gray or light gray hidden text. o hyperlink cross-references are included for various sections, figures, and tables. *National CORE data elements retain their national CORE field guide data element/variable number but may not retain their national CORE field guide location or sequence within the guide. 1 National Urban FIA Plot Field Guide, Version 7.0 SRS Edition, Version 7.01, June 2016 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 8 Urban Overview ........................................................................................................................................ 8 Field Guide Layout ................................................................................................................................... 9 Units of Measure ..................................................................................................................................... 10 0.0+U GENERAL DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................................. 11 0.1+U Plot Setup ................................................................................................................................ 12 0.2+U Plot Integrity ............................................................................................................................ 12 0.3U Plot Monumentation ....................................................................................................................... 13 0.3.1U MONUMENT TYPE................................................................................................................... 13 0.3.2U MONUMENT NUMBER ............................................................................................................ 13 0.3.3U SUBPLOT / MICROPLOT NUMBER ........................................................................................ 13 0.3.4U SUBPLOT / MICROPLOT OFFSET POINT ............................................................................. 14 0.3.5U WITNESS OBJECT / SP / RP TYPE ........................................................................................ 14 0.3.6U WITNESS OBJECT / SP / RP SPECIES .................................................................................. 14 0.3.7U OBJECT DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................................... 15 0.3.8U MONUMENT AZIMUTH ............................................................................................................ 15 0.3.9U MONUMENT HORIZONTAL DISTANCE ................................................................................. 15 0.3.10U MONUMENT DBH / DRC ......................................................................................................... 15 0.4U GPS Starting Point Variables ........................................................................................................ 16 0.4.1U SP/RP GPS UNIT ..................................................................................................................... 16 0.4.2U SP/RP GPS ENTRY METHOD ................................................................................................. 16 0.4.3U SP/RP GPS DATUM ................................................................................................................. 17 0.4.4U SP/RP COORDINATE SYSTEM .............................................................................................. 17 0.4.5U SP/RP LATITUDE DEGREES .................................................................................................. 17 0.4.6U SP/RP LATITUDE MINUTES .................................................................................................... 17 0.4.7U SP/RP LATITUDE SECONDS .................................................................................................. 17 0.4.8U SP/RP LONGITUDE DEGREES ............................................................................................... 18 0.4.9U SP/RP LONGITUDE MINUTES ................................................................................................ 18 0.4.10U SP/RP LONGITUDE SECONDS .............................................................................................. 18 0.4.11U SP/RP UTM ZONE (URBAN OPTIONAL) ................................................................................ 18 0.4.12U SP/RP EASTING (X) UTM (URBAN OPTIONAL) .................................................................... 18 0.4.13U SP/RP NORTHING (Y) UTM (URBAN OPTIONAL) ................................................................. 18 1.0+U PLOT LEVEL DATA ........................................................................................................................ 20 1.0.1U CYCLE ...................................................................................................................................... 20 1.0.2U SUB-CYCLE .............................................................................................................................. 20 1.1 STATE .............................................................................................................................................. 20 1.2 COUNTY .......................................................................................................................................... 20 1.3 PLOT NUMBER ............................................................................................................................... 21 1.4+U URBAN PLOT STATUS ............................................................................................................ 21 1.5 NONFOREST SAMPLING STATUS Not collected in URBAN FIA .................................................. 21 1.6 NONFOREST PLOT STATUS Not collected in URBAN FIA ........................................................... 21 1.7+U URBAN PLOT NONSAMPLED REASON ................................................................................ 22 1.8 NONFOREST PLOT NONSAMPLED REASON Not collected in URBAN FIA ................................ 22 1.9 SUBPLOTS EXAMINED Not collected in URBAN FIA .................................................................... 22 1.10+U SAMPLE KIND ...................................................................................................................... 23 1.11 PREVIOUS PLOT NUMBER (URBAN OPTIONAL) ........................................................................ 23 1.12 FIELD GUIDE VERSION Not Collected in URBAN FIA ................................................................... 23 1.13 Current Date .................................................................................................................................... 23 1.13.1 YEAR ........................................................................................................................................ 23 1.13.2 MONTH ..................................................................................................................................... 24 1.13.3 DAY ........................................................................................................................................... 24 1.14 DECLINATION (URBAN OPTIONAL) .............................................................................................. 24 1.15+U HORIZONTAL DISTANCE TO IMPROVED ROAD .............................................................. 24 1.16+U WATER ON PLOT ................................................................................................................. 24 1.17 QA STATUS ..................................................................................................................................... 25 1.18 CREW NUMBER .............................................................................................................................. 25 1.18.1U QA SCORE (URBAN OPTIONAL) ............................................................................................ 25 1.19 GPS Coordinates ............................................................................................................................ 26 1.19.1 GPS Unit Settings, Datum, and Coordinate System ................................................................. 26 2 National Urban FIA Plot Field Guide, Version 7.0 SRS Edition, Version 7.01, June 2016 1.19.2 Collecting Readings .................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • English Cop17 Inf. 47 (English Only / Únicamente En Inglés / Seulement En Anglais)
    Original language: English CoP17 Inf. 47 (English only / Únicamente en inglés / Seulement en anglais) CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA Seventeenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties Johannesburg (South Africa), 24 September – 5 October 2016 TRADE STUDY OF SELECTED EAST AFRICAN TIMBER PRODUCTION SPECIES This document has been submitted by Germany* in relation to agenda items 62, 77 and 88. * The geographical designations employed in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the CITES Secretariat (or the United Nations Environment Programme) concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The responsibility for the contents of the document rests exclusively with its author. CoP17 Inf. 47 – p. 1 Anthony B. Cunningham Trade study of selected east African timber production species BfN-Skripten 445 2016 Trade study of selected east African timber production species Handelsstudie zu ostafrikanischen Holzarten (FKZ 3514 53 2003) Anthony B. Cunnigham Cover picture: A worker of a sawmill in front of Dalbergia melanoxylon logs in Montepuez/Mozambique (A.B. Cunningham) Author’s address: Dr. Anthony B. Cunningham Cunningham Consultancy WA Pty Ltd. 2 Tapper Street Au-6162 Fremantle E-Mail: [email protected] Scientific Supervision at BfN: Dr. Daniel Wolf Division II 1.2 “Plant Conservation“ This publication is included in the literature database “DNL-online” (www.dnl-online.de) BfN-Skripten are not available in book trade. Publisher: Bundesamt für Naturschutz (BfN) Federal Agency for Nature Conservation Konstantinstrasse 110 53179 Bonn, Germany URL: http://www.bfn.de The publisher takes no guarantee for correctness, details and completeness of statements and views in this report as well as no guarantee for respecting private rights of third parties.
    [Show full text]
  • CITES and Timber (PDF)
    This guide covers the main timber species regulated CITES and Timber by the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES). It provides information CITES and Timber on the key issues regarding the implementation of the Convention for this important group of plants. A guide to CITES-listed tree species Written for the non-expert, individual sections cover the species found in significant trade, with details on their distribution, uses, traded parts and derivatives, and scientific and common names. Madeleine Groves Madeleine Groves Additional sections cover timber identification and measurement, guidance on CITES documentation and key resources. and Catherine Rutherford shop.kew.org/kewbooksonline Madeleine Groves Catherine Rutherford CITES and Timber A guide to CITES-listed tree species Madeleine Groves Catherine Rutherford © The Board of Trustees of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2015 Illustrations and photographs © Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, unless otherwise stated in the captions The authors have asserted their rights to be identified as the authors of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form, or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without written permission of the publisher unless in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988. Great care has been taken to maintain the accuracy of the information contained in this work. However, neither the publisher, the editors nor authors can be held responsible for any consequences arising from use of the information contained herein.
    [Show full text]
  • Cop18 Doc. 105.1 Annex 2
    CoP18 Doc. 105.1 Annex 2 Table of Contents 1. Capra falconeri heptneri (Heptner’s markhor) – Transfer of the population of Tajikistan from Appendix I to Appendix II 3 2. Saiga tatarica (saiga antelope) – Transfer from Appendix II to Appendix I 6 3. Vicugna vicugna (vicuna) – Transfer of the population of the Province of Salta (Argentina) from Appendix I to Appendix II with annotation 1 10 4. Vicugna vicugna (vicuna) – Amendment to the name of the population of Chile from “population of the Primera Región” to “populations of the region of Tarapacá and of the region of Arica and Parinacota” 14 5. Giraffa camelopardalis (giraffe) – Inclusion in Appendix II 17 6. Aonyx cinereus (small clawed otter) – Transfer from Appendix II to Appendix I 19 7. Lutrogale perspicillata (smooth-coated otter) – Transfer from Appendix II to Appendix I 22 8. Ceratotherium simum simum (southern white rhinoceros) − Removal of the existing annotation for the population of Eswatini in Appendix II [currently referred to as the population of Swaziland] 25 9. Ceratotherium simum simum (southern white rhinoceros) − Transfer of the population of Namibia from Appendix I to Appendix II 27 10. Loxodonta Africana (African elephant) – Transfer of the population of African elephant (Loxodonta africana) of Zambia from Appendix I to Appendix II 30 11. Loxodonta africana (African elephant) – Amendment to annotation 2 pertaining to the elephant populations of Botswana, Namibia, South Africa and Zimbabwe 33 12. Loxodonta Africana (African elephant) - Transfer of populations of Botswana, Namibia, South Africa and Zimbabwe from Appendix II to Appendix I 37 13. Mammuthus primigenius (woolly mammoth) – Inclusion in Appendix II 40 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Eidolon Helvum – African Straw-Coloured Fruit-Bat
    Eidolon helvum – African Straw-coloured Fruit-bat plateaus of South Africa. There are no known breeding colonies within the assessment region; the closet one is located in Marromeu in central Mozambique. This species exists in modified landscapes and is often recorded in urban areas. Though it is in decline in other parts of Africa, due to harvesting pressure for bushmeat and traditional medicine, these uses have not been recorded within the assessment region and no regional declines are suspected. Thus, we list this species as Least Concern. Data on additional colonies (especially breeding colonies), population size and trend as well as establishing the threats to this species within the assessment region are needed as it may qualify for a threatened listing and/or a conservation dependent status, especially given the decline of this species in other parts of its range and the Mervin Tuttle potential importance of the assessment region as a regional refuge. Regional Red List status (2016) Least Concern* Regional population effects: Within the assessment National Red List status (2004) Not Evaluated region, it is either an irregular visitor, or possibly a regular migrant at the edge of its range, but does not breed within Reasons for change Non-genuine change: the region. Large-scale feeding and migratory movements New information have been documented (Richter & Cumming 2008) and Global Red List status (2008) Near Threatened A2d thus rescue effects are likely possible. TOPS listing (NEMBA) (2007) None CITES listing None Distribution This fruit-bat is broadly distributed across the lowland Endemic No rainforest and savannah zones of Africa from Senegal in *Watch-list Data the west, through to South Africa in the south and Ethiopia in the east (possibly ranging into Djibouti and southern At present, only a single breeding colony is known Eritrea).
    [Show full text]
  • Timber Trees of Liberia
    Timber trees of Liberia University of Liberia, Monrovia [SCANNED BY OCR 25 JULY 2005] Timber Trees of Liberia by Ir J W A Jansen Formerly Assistant Professor of Forest Botany UNDP/SF/FAO College of Agriculture and Forestry Project University of Liberia University of Liberia Monrovia, 1974 A student at the University of Liberia’s Forest Project (WFP/FAO Photo by Banoun/Caracciolo) TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface....................................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction............................................................................................................................................... 2 Abura......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Acajou blanc ............................................................................................................................................. 5 African oak................................................................................................................................................ 7 Aiele.......................................................................................................................................................... 9 Azobé ...................................................................................................................................................... 11 Bossé ......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Worldwide Translocation of Teak—Origin of Landraces and Present Genetic Base
    Tree Genetics & Genomes (2017) 13: 87 DOI 10.1007/s11295-017-1170-8 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Worldwide translocation of teak—origin of landraces and present genetic base Ole K. Hansen1 & Suchitra Changtragoon 2 & Bundit Ponoy3 & Juan Lopez4 & John Richard5 & Erik D. Kjær1 Received: 11 September 2016 /Revised: 29 May 2017 /Accepted: 4 July 2017 /Published online: 17 July 2017 # The Author(s) 2017. This article is an open access publication Abstract Teak (Tectona grandis Linn. f.) is one of the major introduction. The genetic data suggests that the studied land- plantation timbers of the world. The species is native to India, races originated from either the semi-moist east coast of India, Myanmar, Thailand and Laos in South East Asia but was southern Myanmar or western Thailand. These results indicate translocated to several countries in Africa and Central and that translocation of teak has mainly come from a certain part South America during the past century. Today, large areas of of the native distribution and that this did not include the plantations are grown outside the species native range. It is widespread natural teak areas of southern, dry interior or west- speculated that genetic bottlenecks and founder effects com- ern India or northern Myanmar. bined with new selection pressures under new growing con- ditions have led to the formation of distinct landraces; this Keywords Teak . Landraces . Genetic diversity . Geographic hypothesis is supported by results from international prove- origin . Assignment tests nance tests. In the present study, we apply genetic markers to identify the likely origin of teak grown outside its native range and examine if the landraces show signs of reduced genetic Introduction diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Afromontane Biodiversity Hotspot
    Ecosystem Profile EASTERN AFROMONTANE BIODIVERSITY HOTSPOT FINAL VERSION 24 JANUARY 2012 Prepared by: BirdLife International with the technical support of: Conservation International / Science and Knowledge Division IUCN Global Species Programme – Freshwater Unit IUCN –Eastern Africa Plant Red List Authority Saudi Wildlife Authority Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Centre for Middle Eastern Plants The Cirrus Group UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre WWF - Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Programme Office Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund And support from the International Advisory Committee Neville Ash, UNEP Division of Environmental Policy Implementation; Elisabeth Chadri, MacArthur Foundation; Fabian Haas, International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology; Matthew Hall, Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Centre for Middle Eastern Plants; Sam Kanyamibwa, Albertine Rift Conservation Society; Jean-Marc Froment, African Parks Foundation; Kiunga Kareko, WWF, Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Programme Office; Karen Laurenson, Frankfurt Zoological Society; Leo Niskanen, IUCN Eastern & Southern Africa Regional Programme; Andy Plumptre, Wildlife Conservation Society; Sarah Saunders, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds; Lucy Waruingi, African Conservation Centre. Drafted by the ecosystem profiling team: Ian Gordon, Richard Grimmett, Sharif Jbour, Maaike Manten, Ian May, Gill Bunting (BirdLife International) Pierre Carret, Nina Marshall, John Watkin (CEPF) Naamal de Silva, Tesfay Woldemariam, Matt Foster (Conservation International)
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict Timber: Dimensions of the Problem in Asia and Africa Volume III Table of Contents
    Final Report Submitted to the United States Agency for International Development Conflict Timber: Dimensions of the Problem in Asia and Africa Volume III African Cases Authors Murl Baker, Conflict Resolution Specialist Robert Clausen, Forester Ramzy Kanaan, Natural Resources Management Specialist Michel N’Goma, Forester Trifin Roule, Forensic Economist Jamie Thomson, Institutional Specialist Under the Biodiversity and Sustainable Forestry (BIOFOR) IQC Contract No. LAG-I-00-99-00013-00, Task Order 09 Submitted to: USAID/OTI and USAID/ANE/TS Submitted by: ARD, Inc. 159 Bank Street, Suite 300 Burlington, Vermont USA 05401 Tel: (802) 658-3890 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS................................................................................................................... ii OVERVIEW OF CONFLICT TIMBER IN AFRICA .............................................................................................1 DR CONGO CASE STUDY AND APPENDIXES ...................................................................................................7 GABON CASE STUDY ..........................................................................................................................................116 GUINEA CASE STUDY.........................................................................................................................................126 LIBERIA CASE STUDY ........................................................................................................................................137
    [Show full text]
  • Ing Nailing and Screwing, and Pre-Boring Is Recommended
    UrvlSIANTHE 501 tial of the species in afforestation has been ing nailing and screwing, and pre-boring is recommended. Various quassinoids isolated recommended. The wood is durable, also with- from the plant have shown antimalarial and stands fungal attacks, and is suitable for use in other interesting properties and may have contact with the ground or water pharmacologicalpotential A coumarin derivative has been isolated from Major references Ajaiyeoba & Krebs, 2003; the wood; the bark contains several oxygen- Bolza & Keating, 1972; Burki11, 2000; Dudek, heterocyclic compounds that have not yet been Forster & missenbauer, 1981; Nooteboom, identified. The seeds are rich in mexicanolide 1962; 0teng-Amoako (Editor), 2006; Phong- type Iimonoids and contain 2 triterpenoids. Its phaew, 2003; Saville & Fox, 1967; Stannard, chemical composition confirms the isolated 2000; Voorhoeve, 1979. position of Quiuisiortthe popinoe in the Melt- Other references Adekunle, Oj0 & 01u- aceoe walana, 2002; Adesanwo at a1. , 2004; Ajaiyeoba Botany Deciduous, dioecious, smallto medium- at a1. , 1999; Capuron, 1961; CTFT, 1962e; sized tree up to 20(-30) in tall; hole up to 50 cm Fouarge & G6rard, 1964; Francois at a1. , 1998; in diameter. Leaves alternate, panpinnately Gunb-Fakim & Brendler, 2004; Hawthorne, compound with 5-8 pairs of leaflets; stipules 1995; InsideWood, undated; 1stas, Raekelboom absent; leaflets opposite, elliptical, curieate at & Heremans, 1959; Kryn & Fobes, 1959; Lu- base, obtuse to rounded at apex, entire, pm- monadio at a1. , 1991; Martret, Farmes & Soul. nately veined. Inflorescence a short axillary Ier, 1992; Miralles at a1. , 1988; Neuwinger, panicle, short-hairy. Flowers unisexual, male 2000; Orig, 2001; Perez, 2003; Prot & Korn- and female flowers very similar in appearance, probst, 1985; Takahashi, 1978; Van den Eyn- regular, 5-merous, small; calyx cup-shaped, den, Van Damme & de Wolf, 1994 lobed to the middle; petals free; stamens coin- Sources of illustration Voorhoeve, 1979; PIetely fused into a hairy tube, arithers In- Wilks & Issemb6, 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Pterocarpus Angolensis Fabaceae
    Pterocarpus angolensis DC. Fabaceae - Papilionoideae muninga, mukwa, kiaat LOCAL NAMES Afrikaans (kiaat,lakboom,greinhout,kehatenhout); Bemba (mulombwa); English (sealing-wax tree,Rhodesian teak,Transvaal teak,bloodwood,wild teak,African teak); Lozi (mukwa,mulombe); Lunda (mukula); Ndebele (umvagazi); Nyanja (mlombwa,mlombe); Shona (kiaat,mubvamaropa,mukwa); Swahili (mninga); Tongan (mukula); Trade name (kiaat,mukwa,muninga); Tswana (mokwa,morotomadi); Zulu (inGozina,inDlandlovu,umBilo,umVangazi) BOTANIC DESCRIPTION Pterocarpus angolensis is a medium to Pterocarpus angolensis is a medium-size to large, deciduous tree that large (up to 30 m tall) deciduous tree with an grows up to 30 m tall; bark on young twigs is smooth, grey and covered open, spreading crown. The heartwood is with hairs, and on the older branches and stems it is dark grey and rough very attractive, moderately dense, easily to fissured. worked and widely used for high-quality furniture and ornaments. (Botha AD) Leaves with 5-9 pairs of subopposite to alternate leaflets; leaflets elliptic- lanceolate to obovate, 2.5-7 x 2-4.5 cm, top surface without hairs, underside hairy when young, losing these by maturity; apex tapering to a narrow point, bristle-tipped; base rounded; margin entire, wavy, tightly rolled under petiolules, and petiole velvety; stipules narrow, up to 8 mm long, velvety, falling early. The pealike flowers abundant, orange-yellow in colour, very sweetly scented and borne in large, branched sprays 10-20 cm long. The leaves of Pterocarpus angolensis are Fruit a very distinctive, indehiscent, circular pod with a diameter of 8-10 compound; 9 - 25 pairs of leaflets plus a cm. The seed case, which is densely covered with harsh bristles up to 1.3 terminal one; tip tapering to a narrow bristle- cm in length, is surrounded by a broad, membranous, light, wavy wing up tipped point, base rounded, margins entire; to 3 cm in width, which adds to its buoyancy.
    [Show full text]
  • International Tropical Timber Organization Project
    INTERNATIONAL TROPICAL TIMBER ORGANIZATION ITTO PROJECT DOCUMENT TITLE: TIMBERS OF TROPICAL AFRICA PART 2: GROUP 7(2) WITHIN THE PROTA PROGRAMME SERIAL NUMBER: PD 479/07 Rev.2 (M) COMMITTEE: ECONOMIC INFORMATION AND MARKET INTELLIGENCE SUBMITTED BY: GOVERNMENT OF GHANA ORIGINAL LANGUAGE: ENGLISH BACKGROUND: As part of a total programme to improve the access to information on the 7000 useful plants of Tropical Africa and to promote their use in a sustainable manner, PROTA (Plant Resources of Tropical Africa) will make a synthesis of all existing but dispersed knowledge on the estimated 1070 ‘Timbers of Tropical Africa’ (Commodity group 7) in two Parts. This document concerns the second sub-project, on the 570 ‘Timbers of Tropical Africa’ from currently less important timber-producing taxonomic families (Commodity group 7(2)). It is preceded by a sub-project on the 500 ‘Timbers of Tropical Africa’ from the currently more important timber-producing taxonomic families (Commodity group 7(1); ITTO Project PD 264/04 Rev. 3 (M,I)). PROTA is strongly rooted in the group that successfully delivered the ITTO-funded PROSEA ‘Timber trees’ Handbook volumes. IMPLEMENTING AGENCY: PLANT RESOURCES OF TROPICAL AFRICA (PROTA) with the Implementing Bodies: 1. PROTA Network Office Africa 2. PROTA Network Office Europe 3. PROTA Regional Office Anglophone West Africa 4. PROTA Regional Office Central Africa 5. PROTA Regional Office francophone West Africa 6. PROTA Regional Office East Africa 7. PROTA Regional Office Southern Africa 8. PROTA Regional Office Indian Ocean Islands 9. PROTA Country Office France 10. PROTA Country Office United Kingdom 11. PROSEA Foundation DURATION: 36 MONTHS BUDGET AND PROPOSED SOURCES OF FINANCING: SOURCE CONTRIBUTION IN US$ ITTO 596,419 PROTA 457,216 TOTAL 1,053,635 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PART I: CONTEXT 1.
    [Show full text]
  • USDA Forest Service Forest Resource Assessment Trip Kuando Kubango Province, Angola Trip and Assessment Report
    USDA Forest Service Forest Resource Assessment Trip Kuando Kubango Province, Angola In support of the USAID Regional Center for Southern Africa’s Okavango Integrated River Basin and the Angolan Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development’s National Institute for Forestry Development and Management Project Trip and Assessment Report Mission Dates: May 16 – June 1, 2006 Report submitted by: Michelle Zweede Hugh Safford Glen Juergens USDA Forest Service USDA Forest Service USDA Forest Service International Programs Region 5 Monongahela NF TABLE OF CONTENTS Meeting Itinerary 4 Executive Summary 6 Scope of the Technical Assistance 8 Background Objectives Activities Deliverables Kunado Kubango’s Overview 9 Findings 9 Overview 9 Existing Forest Conditions 10 Threats to Biodiversity and Forests 11 Key Issues for Forest Management 12 Recommendations 13 Issue 1: Vegetation identification and growth characteristics 13 Findings and Recommendations Issue 2: Forest Inventory Data Collection 14 Findings and Recommendations Issue 3: GIS Data and Satellite Imagery Utilization 15 Findings and Recommendations Issue 4: Participatory Land Management Planning Methodology 16 Findings and Recommendations Issue 5: Fire Prevention and Community Awareness 17 Findings and Recommendations Issue 6: Law Enforcement Training 19 Findings and Recommendations Action Plan 20 Next Steps 21 Budget and Timeline 24 References 25 2 Appendices I. Scope of Work 27 II. Memorandum of Understanding 31 III. Acknowledgements 34 IV. Meeting, Field Notes & Contact List 35 V. Community
    [Show full text]