Rev. Theodore M. Hesburgh

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rev. Theodore M. Hesburgh •••••••••••••••••~~~~~~~~=======i•;121rn•=•••••••·1m1n11s1r1rii''"'''-'""'"" ( 0 N T E N T ~ Letters ~ Newsbrlefs Milestones As Fordham's Sesquicentennial begins, a look at past anniversaries reveals that they often coincided with important turning points­ for the University, the Catholic Church and the nation. 1~ What Makes a Catholic University Great? Father Theodore Hesburgh on the future of American Catholic higher education u West Side Stories The West End Intergenerational Residence is bridging gaps between young and old, black and white. H Denzel Washington: Glory Days It's no coincidence that Academy-Award-winner Denzel Washington's repertoire consists largely of likeable characters. 11 Family Stories: Why They Matter .. Tales about our ancestors can help us change our lives. i~ Ramifications Has Fordham's evolving athletic program found a home in the Patriot League? Commencement Alumni News a Class Notes COVER: faces from a recent commencement and the 1943 Maroon yearbook reflect the Sesquicentennial's theme of continuity and confidence. Background photo by Tom Sobolik. C E E B R A T N G F 0 h D H A M SOU CENT NN A -· -------- ------------------- ----- n why American Catholic colleges and unlve'l'sltles have thrived The vitality of Catholic higher education over the past generation is my biggest surprise. Many of the 800 or so private schools that are not Catholic are A N I N T E I R v E w getting into hard times in attracting stu­ I dents. That hasn't happened to the 250 or so Catholic schools. They are not only j prospering, but are growing in academic vitality with their alumni becoming in­ I creasingly distinguished. The key to our l success is that we are directly committed to values - as well as intelligence. ll w T I' H F A T H E A Switching to lay control, as Notre Dame did in 1967 and Fordham in 1968, ii11' put us in a very strong position to main­ tain our academic freedom. That has given us a kind of strength that simply isn't possible if you're on a string to peo­ ple who can tell you what to do - whether it's church or state. T H E 0 D 0 A E H E S B U A G H n why the Church's view of the American I schools Is often mistaken My biggest disappointment is that the church we serve doesn't always recognize our value or our particular na­ ture and what it requires. I'm talking mainly here about freedom. I think we are totally dedicated to the Church, to­ Rev. Theodore Hesburgh, tally dedicated to being a place where .. C.S.C.,president of the University of the Church can do its thinking about a lot of things that need a great deal of Notre Dame from 1952 to 1987, has thought, but which can't be easily done I I given the church structure or parishes I ! been called "the most influential and catechetical centers. I At times we are accused of not being I cleric in America" and is widely Catholic. That's a pretty fundamental ac­ considered the "dean" of American cusation. I've heard it a thousand times I II guess, mostly not from the Church di­ I! rectly, but from groups \\ithin the I, Catholic higher education. In 1967, he was awarded an honorary Ii Church, splinter groups, far right-groups degree by Fordham. To mark the beginning of Fordham's that are hypercritical and not under­ standing. I would imagine bushel baskets II Sesquicentennial Year, Father Hesburgh spoke with FORDIIA:\f full of mail go to the Vatican all the time i! ,,if saying that we're listening to people fa­ magazine contributing editor jerry Buckley (FCO '77) about Fordham : I voring abortion, that we're not strong 'I' i II enough on birth control. But the moral , I and the future of American Catholic higher education. Excerpts: , I, convictions we started with, without I ,,/i doing the rest'arch and listening to other peoplt'. wouldn't be \'t'f}' \'alid in our kind of pluralistic society. I tell :\otre Danll' 0 S benefactors that if you're not F 0 R 0 H A M <D ..... convinced we're a Catholic university, n vocations and the you can't price yourself out of the mar­ you ought to give your money to some­ danger of secularization ket. Fordham has consistently kept its body else. The greatest challenge ahead is tuition low compared to the public edu­ I think the Holy Father has a sincere not money. If we're doing a good cation competition and has continued to interest in Catholic higher education and job, we'll be financed. The greatest dan­ grow and be concerned about the great he has said some good things. The main ger is that we'll become secular. If that cultural questions. I think, for example, objection from many of us in this country happens, we don't deserve to be fi­ of Father Joe Fitzpatrick and his great is the Vatican's current attempt to put nanced. The great bulk of the people work with Hispanics. out a universal document regarding who contribute to Notre Dame do so be­ The Catholic community has to say Catholic higher education that has to be cause it is a Catholic university. these are gems in our crowns and they applied in the most diverse cultures and Vocations are important and fortu­ ought to have our total support. political situations. It would be a prob­ nately they're leveling off. We need a lem if they were to propose to tell us really vital core. n what makes who can teach and who can't. They say People wonder why so many great a great university everybody who teaches has to have some universities founded by churches became I My basic point is that university sort of mandate from Catholic authority, so totally secular. The Methodists is the substantive and Catholic is whatever that is. But you can't legislate founded Syracuse University, Boston the adjective. Small-minded people tend for the whole world with strict regula­ University, Duke, Emory, Southern to put the Catholic first and the univer­ tions. Methodist, University of Southern Cali­ sity second. As a result, it becomes not a The assumption is if you put out a fornia and Denver, and no one would great university, but a great Catholic whole new schema of things it's going to claim that those schools, with the possi­ center of some kind. It may do good make us more Catholic. We're Catholic ble exception of Emory, now have much work, but you're not going to mistake it within om circumstances. There's no of a religious tradition. Catholic universi­ for a university. A great Catholic univer­ conditioning of our commitment. We ties, when they went under lay control, sity must be three things. just have to exercise it in ways appropri­ didn't [become secular) because they had First, a beacon, because in addition ate to our pluralistic culture. a strong religious affiliation and that is to all the secular studies that all univers­ It is worth noting that in general, the something that must be kept up. ities must do, it brings the light of phi­ people who have produced these docu­ You can't avoid secularization per se, losophy and theology to bear on all of ments have never created anything in but you have to constantly be alert to it these other studies. Faith seeking under­ Catholic higher education themselves. and as much as possible, strengthen the standing. Reason seeking faith. That is a (The Jesuits] have responded to Catholic core in the selection of faculty, function no other kind of university changes in [the J cities very well by including non-Catholics. I'm strongly of [has]. opening their universities up, making a the opinion that lay people are the most Second, it has to be a crossroads in­ big effort to get minorities in and to hold important part of the Church. The tellectually and morally. It has to be a .. high the Catholic concern. Loyalty is the Church is now more than ever the peo­ place where everybody passes and where important thing. Anyone who would ever ple of God. That was the big message of all points of view are seen and heard, accuse the Jesuits of being disloyal ought the Second Vatican Council. So we're even conflicting points of view that are to have their head examined. Many of not going to have as many priests as we argued with great fervor at times, and them have died for the Church, includ­ had. But you can make the case that we where there is a great tolerance and ci­ ing the six in El Salvador. had too many priests in the old days. vility. You can learn a great deal from Historically, the American Church people who don't agree with you. hierarchy has been very supportive of n Fordham and the Jesuits Finally, it has to be a bridge - be­ us. At no expense to the Bishops, we ed­ If you mention five or six Catho­ tween all the things that are separated in ucate 500,000 young Catholics every I lic universities in America, you society- young and old, black and white, year and they appreciate that. But if always have to mention Fordham ignorance and learning, rich and poor, they get orders from Rome, some of because it has a history, a record of ser­ East and West, North and South.
Recommended publications
  • News Release Michigan State University Commencement
    NEWS RELEASE MEDIA CONTACT: Kristen Parker, University Relations, (517) 353-8942, [email protected] MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY COMMENCEMENT/CONVOCATION SPEAKERS 1907 Theodore Roosevelt, U.S. president 1914 Thomas Mott Osborn 1915 David Starr Jordan, Chancellor, Leland Stanford Junior University 1916 William Oxley Thompson, president, Ohio State University 1917 Samuel M. Crothers 1918 Liberty H. Bailey 1919 Robert M. Wenley, University of Michigan 1920 Harry Luman Russell, dean, University of Wisconsin 1921 Woodridge N. Ferris 1922 David Friday, MSU president 1923 John W. Laird 1924 Dexter Simpson Kimball, dean, Cornell University 1925 Frank O. Lowden 1926 Francis J. McConnell 1931 Charles R. McKenny, president, Michigan State Normal College 1933 W.D. Henderson, director of university extension, University of Michigan 1934 Ernest O. Melby, professor of education, Northwestern University 1935 Edwin Mims, professor of English, Vanderbilt University 1936 Gordon Laing, professor, University of Chicago 1937 William G. Cameron, Ford Motor Co. 1938 Frank Murphy, governor of Michigan 1939 Howard C. Elliott, president, Purdue University 1940 Allen A. Stockdale, Speakers’ Bureau, National Assoc. of Manufacturers 1941 Raymond A. Kent, president, University of Louisville 1942 John J. Tiver, president, University of Florida 1943 C.A. Dykstra, president, University of Wisconsin 1944 Howard L. Bevis, president, Ohio State University 1945 Franklin B. Snyder, president, Northwestern University 1946 Edmund E. Day, president, Cornell University 1947 James L. Morrill, president, University of Minnesota 1948 Charles F. Kettering 1949 David Lilienthal, chairperson, U.S. Atomic Commission 1950 Alben W. Barkley, U.S. vice president (For subsequent years: S-spring; F-fall; W-winter) 1951-S Nelson A.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Tiaa-Cref Theodore M. Hesburgh Award for Leadership Excellence
    2010 TIAA-CREF THEODORE M. HESBURGH AWARD FOR LEADERSHIP EXCELLENCE Vision is what leadership is all about. Leadership is how you bring that vision into reality. If you want people to go with you, you have to share a vision. Reverend Theodore M. Hesburgh, C.S.C., President Emeritus, University Of Notre Dame William E. Kirwan CHANCELLOR, UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF MARYLAND 2010 TIAA-CREF THEODORE M. HESBURGH AWARD WINNER Presenting the In looking at leaders in higher education who best exemplify Father Hesburgh’s shining example of visionary thinking, integrity, and a selfless commitment to TIAA-CREF Hesburgh award the greater good, one name becomes clear: Dr. William E. Kirwan. The TIAA-CREF Theodore M. Hesburgh Award for Leadership Excellence TIAA-CREF is proud to salute Dr. Kirwan as the 2010 recipient of the is named in honor of Reverend Hesburgh, C.S.C., president emeritus of the TIAA-CREF Theodore M. Hesburgh Award for Leadership Excellence. University of Notre Dame and former member of the TIAA-CREF Board of Over his nearly half-century as an educator, administrator, and community Overseers for 28 years. leader, Dr. Kirwan has been a passionate advocate for a broad spectrum of major issues facing higher education. He gives selflessly of his abilities and The award recognizes leadership and commitment to higher education and energy to encourage the sharing and shaping of ideas and practices across contributions to the greater good. It is presented to a current college or Maryland, the United States, and beyond. university president or chancellor who embodies the spirit of Father Hesburgh, his commitment and contributions to higher education and society.
    [Show full text]
  • Hesburgh Scholar Program
    HESBURGH SCHOLAR PROGRAM Inspired by the work of Rev. Theodore Hesburgh, CSC, the Hesburgh Scholar Program challenges students to use their talents to aid in the construction of a world where justice, peace and love prevail. Rev. Theodore Hesburgh, CSC: Renowned Leader A priest of the Congregation of Holy Cross, Rev. Theodore Hesburgh, CSC, is considered one of the nation’s truly great leaders. Committed to nurturing spiritual values, Fr. Hesburgh has substantially shaped and articulated America’s conscience on numerous social issues. Fr. Hesburgh served as President of the University of Notre Dame for 35 years (1952-1987), but his work was not limited to the University. His remarkable achievements in the public sector include service on 16 Presidential Commissions in the areas of civil rights, peaceful uses of atomic energy, and Third World development. Widely recognized for his work, he has received over 150 honorary degrees, the Congressional Gold Medal, and the Medal of Freedom. Inspired by the work of Fr. Hesburgh, the Rev. Theodore Hesburgh, CSC Scholar Program challenges students to use their talents to aid in the construction of the world “where justice, peace and love prevail.” What is the Hesburgh Scholar Program? The Rev. Theodore Hesburgh, CSC Scholar Program is designed to challenge the most gifted and motivated students in a demanding course of studies. The Hesburgh Scholar Program not only requires the development of the student’s abilities in all areas of the academic curriculum, but also seeks to further his overall development through involvement in various service-oriented and extracurricular activities. Admissions Criteria and Expectations Members of the Hesburgh Scholar Program are invited to apply at the end of the first semester of their freshman or sophomore year.
    [Show full text]
  • Father Ted's Obituary
    For Immediate Release Feb. 27, 2015 Father Theodore Hesburgh of Notre Dame dies at age 97 Rev. Theodore M. Hesburgh, C.S.C., president of the University of Notre Dame from 1952 to 1987, a priest of the Congregation of Holy Cross, and one of the nation’s most influential figures in higher education, the Catholic Church, and national and international affairs, died at 11:30 p.m. Thursday (Feb. 26) at Holy Cross House adjacent to the University. He was 97. “We mourn today a great man and faithful priest who transformed the University of Notre Dame and touched the lives of many,” said Rev. John I. Jenkins, C.S.C., Notre Dame’s president. “With his leadership, charisma and vision, he turned a relatively small Catholic college known for football into one of the nation’s great institutions for higher learning. “In his historic service to the nation, the Church and the world, he was a steadfast champion for human rights, the cause of peace and care for the poor. “Perhaps his greatest influence, though, was on the lives of generations of Notre Dame students, whom he taught, counseled and befriended. “Although saddened by his loss, I cherish the memory of a mentor, friend and brother in Holy Cross and am consoled that he is now at peace with the God he served so well.” In accord with Father Hesburgh’s wishes, a customary Holy Cross funeral Mass will be celebrated in the Basilica of the Sacred Heart at Notre Dame in coming days for his family, Holy Cross religious, University Trustees, administrators, and select advisory council members, faculty, staff and students.
    [Show full text]
  • Vita Michigan State University Department of History East Lansing
    Vita William James Schoenl Professor Michigan State University Department of History East Lansing, Michigan 48824 Telephone: (517) 351-0456 Educational Background: Ph.D., History, Columbia University, New York, N.Y., 1968 M.A., History, Columbia University, 1964 B.S., Mathematics, Canisius College, Buffalo, N.Y., 1963 Career Employment: 1989- Professor of History, Michigan State University 1978-1989 Professor of Humanities, Michigan State University 1972-1978 Associate Professor of Humanities, MSU 1968-1972 Assistant Professor of Humanities, MSU Books Published: Editor, New Perspectives on the Vietnam War: Our Allies’ Views (Lanham, New York, and Oxford: University Press of America, 2002) Author, C.G. Jung: His Friendships with Mary Mellon and J. B. Priestley (Wilmette: Chiron Publications, 1998) [NOTE: Chiron is the leading publisher of books in Jungian studies in the United States.] Editor, Major Issues in the Life and Work of C. G. Jung (Lanham, New York, and London: University Press of America, 1996) Author, The Intellectual Crisis in English Catholicism (New York and London: Garland Publishing, 1982) [NOTE: a book in the Garland Series in Modern British History, edited by Peter Stansky and Leslie Hume, Stanford University.] Contributor of numerous articles and reviews to professional journals. The American Historical Review, The Journal of Analytical Psychology, Church History, The Catholic Historical Review, Victorian Studies, and Choice have published my reviews. 1 I have given papers, chaired sessions, and served as commentator at annual meetings of the American Historical Association, Catholic Historical Association, American Society of Church History, Midwest Conference on British Studies, and Michigan Academy of Arts and Sciences. I have also been a member of each of these professional associations.
    [Show full text]
  • Rev. Theodore M. Hesburgh, C.S.C. Priest
    VOLUME 48, ISSUE 98 | FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 2015 | NDSMCOBSERVER.COM REV. THEODORE M. HESBURGH, C.S.C. PRIEST GOD , COUNTRY, NOTRE DAME In memoriam of the impact Rev. Theodore M. Hesburgh had on the Notre Dame Family, the Nation and the Catholic Church. r. Theodore Hesburgh, whose unprecedented 35-year tenure as president of Notre Dame revolutionized the University, making him Fone of the most influential figures in higher education, and whose dedication to social issues brought him worldwide recognition, died Feb. 26. He was 97. When Hesburgh became the 15th president of Notre Dame in 1952, the University was comprised of all males. It was owned and operated by the Theodore Bernard Hesburgh Holy Cross Order with an endowment of $9 million and yearly student aid to tuition at $20,000. When Hesburgh retired in 1987, Notre Dame had grown its student body to include both men and women. He transitioned the school’s governance to a mixed board of lay and religious trustees that still operates the University today. The endowment had grown to $350 million over 35 years and student aid hit $40 million. His presidency transformed the school into the top-tier educational institution it is today. But Hesburgh was, first and foremost, a simple priest. “I would say if there is one thing that my whole life has been dedicated to, I’ve been a priest now for about 70 years, and I would hope they remember me as a priest,” Hesburgh told The Observer in May 2013. “‘Fr. Ted’ is the best title I have.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgetown at Two Hundred: Faculty Reflections on the University's Future
    GEORGETOWN AT Two HUNDRED Content made available by Georgetown University Press and Digital Georgetown Content made available by Georgetown University Press and Digital Georgetown GEORGETOWN AT Two HUNDRED Faculty Reflections on the University's Future William C. McFadden, Editor Georgetown University Press WASHINGTON, D.C. Content made available by Georgetown University Press and Digital Georgetown Copyright © 1990 by Georgetown University Press All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Georgetown at two hundred : faculty reflections on the university's future / William C. McFadden, editor. p. cm. ISBN 0-87840-502-X. — ISBN 0-87840-503-8 (pbk.) 1. Georgetown University—History. 2. Georgetown University— Planning. I. McFadden, William C, 1930- LD1961.G52G45 1990 378.753—dc20 90-32745 CIP Content made available by Georgetown University Press and Digital Georgetown FOR THE GEORGETOWN FAMILY — STUDENTS, FACULTY, ADMINISTRATORS, STAFF, ALUMNI, AND BENEFACTORS, LET US PRAY TO THE LORD. Daily offertory prayer of Brian A. McGrath, SJ. (1913-88) Content made available by Georgetown University Press and Digital Georgetown Content made available by Georgetown University Press and Digital Georgetown Contents Foreword ix Introduction xi Past as Prologue R. EMMETT CURRAN, S J. Georgetown's Self-Image at Its Centenary 1 The Catholic Identity MONIKA K. HELLWIG Post-Vatican II Ecclesiology: New Context for a Catholic University 19 R. BRUCE DOUGLASS The Academic Revolution and the Idea of a Catholic University 39 WILLIAM V. O'BRIEN Georgetown and the Church's Teaching on International Relations 57 Georgetown's Curriculum DOROTHY M. BROWN Learning, Faith, Freedom, and Building a Curriculum: Two Hundred Years and Counting 79 JOHN B.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorandum, President Nixon Meeting with Commission on an All
    「下情三 幸井出丁離 日Cう∪$蚤 WASトロ卜」G千〇予」 M丑MORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDFNT SUBJECT: Meeting with Commission on An A11細Volu.n七eer Arlned Fo].Ce February 2l, 1970 1l:00A.M. Cabine七RooIn PURPOSE Requested by Martin Anderson to allow thc Commission tO PreSent its COmPleted repOrt・ エI. BACKGROUND A. This was a 。working commission・ 。 The members particIPated deep]y in the prepara七ion of the study, and did not rely exclusive]y, as many commissions do, On the staff・ During the las七year they SPent OVer 100 hours and many long weekends in. Commission. meetings. There was∴a gene]:al feeling m the Commission that the issue r thcy were dealillg Wi七h was one of great importance・ They Were Vitally concerned with national security, and onlv after a long, SOul輸SCarChing examination of the pros and cons did they unanimously conclude that 。the nationls interes七s w丑l be bett e聖畦上狸聖 all録VOlunte∋er f。rCe, SuPPOr七ed bv an .′ effective standby draft, than by a mixed fol.Ce Of voluntecrs and conscripts. (and) that a v0lun王eer force will not JeOPal.dizc na七ional secul.ity, and. wi11 haヽ′e a beneficia‘し effect on Lhc milゴtary aLS Well as the rest of our∴S。Ciety. 。 Their basic∴工・ccOmmendations are: (l〉 Raise basic pay for mili七ary personnel in the first two years of seユ:Vice. The estimated cost is about $3. 3 billion a, year. (Z) M諒e comprehcnsive improvements in condiLions Of military sel.Vice・ (3) 曲鉦ablish a. sしa朝航y draft. _Z- Tom Gates was particularly effective as Chairman・ Each Commission mem-ber is a一一star一一inhis own right, the issues were con七roversial, yet Gates managed to sm0Othly and de工tly keep the Commission moving to a una,n王mous report.
    [Show full text]
  • Notre Dame College Prep
    Notre Dame College Prep COMMITTED TO FORMING MEN OF FAITH, SCHOLARSHIP AND SERVICE School Notre Dame College Prep is a Roman Catholic college preparatory school and has educated more than 12,000 young men since its founding in 1954. Located in Niles, Illinois, on 28 wooded acres, Notre Dame Notre Dame currently enrolls over 800 students. Our students come from Chicago and 29 different suburbs.Notre College Prep Dame’s approach to education is holistic. We educate the mind, but never at the expense of the heart. 7655 West Dempster Street The instructional programs at Notre Dame have distinct levels of challenge: Advanced Placement, Honors, Niles, Illinois 60714 College Prep Core, and the Andre Program. Each level is geared to prepare our students for college Phone: 847-965-2900 admission. Rigorous courses of study are designed to meet the educational needs of our diverse student Fax: 847-965-2975 body and are tailored to provide challenging educational experiences for our students. www.nddons.org Mission CEEB/ACT School Code: 141-063 Under the patronage of Mary, Notre Dame College Prep is a secondary school committed to educating PRESIDENT young men to be gentlemen of faith, scholarship, and service in an inclusive, family-oriented community. Mr. Ralph J. Elwart Faithful to the Roman Catholic tradition and inspired by Gospel values, we prepare students to be lifelong learners and to lead lives of integrity. PRINCIPAL Mr. Daniel E. Tully Hesburgh Scholar Program COUNSELING CENTER Named in honor of University of Notre Dame President Emeritus Rev. Theodore Hesburgh, CSC, this program Mr. Steve Murray, Director is designed to challenge the most gifted and motivated student with a demanding course of studies.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Current State of Catholic Higher Education
    N o t e s 1 The Current State of Catholic Higher Education 1 . John Paul II, Fides et Ratio (Boston: Pauline Books & Media, 1998). 2 . Alice Gallin, O. S. U., ed., American Catholic Higher Education: The Essential Documents, 1967–1990 (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1992), 7. 3 . Edward Manier and John Houck, eds., Academic Freedom and the Catholic University (Notre Dame, IN: Fides Publishers, 1967); Neil G. McCluskey, S. J., ed., The Catholic University: A Modern Appraisal (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1970); Paul L. Williams, ed., Catholic Higher Education: Proceedings of the Eleventh Convention of the Fellowship of Catholic Scholars (Pittston, PA: Northeast Books, 1989); George S. Worgul Jr., Issues in Academic Freedom (Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press, 1992). 4 . Recent American historians have documented, from a purely historical perspec- tives, the severance of academic inquiry from religious belief. See George M. Marsden, The Soul of the American University: From Protestant Establishment to Established Nonbelief (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994); James Tunstead Burtchaell, The Dying of the Light: The Disengagement of Colleges and Universities from Their Christian Churches (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1998); Julie A. Reuben, The Making of the Modern University: Intellectual Transformation and the Marginalization of Morality (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1996); Jon Roberts and James Turner, The Sacred and the Secular University (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000); David J. O’Brien, From the Heart of the American Church: Catholic Higher Education and American Culture (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 1994); and Philip Gleason, Contending with Modernity: Catholic Higher Education in the Twentieth Century (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995).
    [Show full text]
  • A Catholic's Dissent from the Bishops' Immigration Policy
    CIS Letterhead_Layout 1 7/26/12 4:34 PM Page 1 Center for Immigration Studies C I S April 2014 A Catholic’s Dissent from the Bishops’ Immigration Policy By Jerry Kammer ike many Catholics, I have been bitterly disappointed in the church’s negligence in its response to the pedophile priests. And as someone who thinks legal immigration should be reduced and illegal immigration should not be encouraged, I have been disappointed that the policy preferences of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops seem to be reducible Lto a slogan: “More green cards, less enforcement!” But after viewing a video of a presentation at an immigration conference last month at the University of Notre Dame, I now have a better understanding of the bishops’ immigration advocacy. But I also have a new criticism. The speaker was Kevin Appleby, director of migration policy and public affairs at the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops. Like me, Kevin is an alumnus of Notre Dame. I know him to be a man of great integrity and deep humanity. Appleby, is also skilled politically. I first became aware of his lobbying prowess on Capitol Hill in 2006, when the Senate Ju- diciary Committee passed a sweeping comprehensive immigration reform bill. Appleby, was at the center of a celebration that spontaneously broke out in the hearing room. Also there was Randall Johnson of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, who hugged Jeanne Butterfield of the American Immigration Lawyers Association. Frank Sharry, then of the National Immigration Form, slapped Appleby, on the back and acknowledged the lobbying effort he had led by exclaiming, “The Catholic boys did it!” “The Catholic boys” are an important part of the strange-bedfellows coalition that keeps pushing for the cumbersome pack- age of measures known as “comprehensive immigration reform”.
    [Show full text]
  • Mayor Marvin's Column
    MAYOR MARVIN'S COLUMN At this time of year, I am a keen observer of commencement addresses, having spent weeks writing one to deliver at the Bronxville High school graduation of 2008. It was the honor of my life. Tlus past month, I was struck fIrst by the number of extremely accomplished, ground breaking, brave people who were disinvited or respectfully backed out as commencement speakers after student and/or faculty protests. Snlith College nlissed out on one of the world's most pronlinent and powerful women, Christine Legarde, because, "she leads an imperialistic and patriarchal system," according to student organizers and just listening to her would be paramount to endorsement. What a lost moment to hear the triumphs and travails of a fellow woman who has navigated a traditionally male sphere. To her credit, the President of Stnith College, KatWeen McCartney, refused to rescind the invitation stating that she is, "committed to leading a college where differing views can be heard and debated with respect." However, Ms. Legarde cancelled given the protests. A similar situation occurred at Rutgers when Condoleeza Rice gracefully bowed out after not only students but the faculty council said just listening to her, "was encouraging a world that justifIes torture," Completing the First Amendment repression hat trick, Haverford College caused Robert Burgeneau, former Chancellor of the University of California, Berkeley to withdraw as commencement speaker. Students wanted him, as condition of attendance, to formally apologize for allowing police to use batons at an Occupy protest in 2011. Truth be told, Chancellor Burgeneau actually launched an investigation after being disturbed by a videotape of the baton use.
    [Show full text]