DOCSLIB.ORG

Rainbow River Environmental Study Dunnellon, Florida

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rainbow River Environmental Study Dunnellon, Florida Rainbow River Environmental Study Dunnellon, Florida Final Report September 2012 (Revised) Charles E. Cichra, PhD Program in Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences School of Forest Resources and Conservation Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences University of Florida and Stephen M. Holland, PhD Department of Tourism, Recreation and Sports Management Eric Friedheim Tourism Institute University of Florida This project was funded by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Recreation and Parks as Contract RP728 Acknowledgements This project could not have been completed without the assistance of many people. The user counting aspects of this study was an example of excellent teamwork. In Dunnellon, local residents Burt Eno, Bill Vibbert, and Paul Marraffino were helpful in identifying potential and actual camera sites, installing and uninstalling the recording stations, and assisting Steve Holland in changing tapes throughout the year. They also monitored the equipment periodically and maintained contact with the residents who allowed the use of their river docks to be the base for each camera station. Those residents will remain anonymous, but it is not an exaggeration to say that this study could not have been done without their generous willingness to tolerate our random arrivals to check equipment and change tapes and in their willingness to allow sometimes not very sightly equipment boxes, cameras or wiring to be in place for over a year on their otherwise scenic docks. Ms. Sandra Fournier of Marion County parks was always timely and helpful in answering various river recreation questions and providing information on KP Hole County Park’s users. In Gainesville, Dr. Ting-Bing Wu, post-doctoral assistant to Steve Holland, spent hundreds of hours viewing thousands of hours of tape, patiently recording the various user type counts. She was patient, accurate and relentless in getting the counts completed. Several short-term graduate students were hired to assist in counting the tapes and Dr. Wu trained them and monitored their output to assure quality. When some count did not seem correct, she was willing to locate the questionable day and camera tape and review it to either verify or revise that count. Her work ethic is commendable and a major component of the production of the results of this study. Ms. Erika Banks-Payne and Ms. Dorothea Roebuck processed and monitored the project’s paperwork and budget as well as guided the proposal submission process through the University of Florida’s Division of Sponsored Research. The environmental field work was accomplished by Jesse Stephens, Dana Bigham, Doug Colle, Amanda Croteau, Geoff Smith, Kimberly Orren, Sharon Fitz-Coy, and Dylan Scott. Jesse, Doug, Sharon, and Dylan processed the aquatic plant and water samples in the laboratory. Jesse made sure that all sampling equipment was constructed, procured, and ready for use for the field sampling. Amanda played a major role in data entry, analysis and interpretation, and preparation of this final report. The county staff at the KP Hole, in particular Sandra Fournier, were very cooperative and provided assistance as needed. Jeff Sowards (Manager, Rainbow Springs Aquatic Preserve) allowed us to conduct the study on properties under his jurisdiction and cooperated in all ways with the project, including sample design and data collection. In Tallahassee, Zack Wetzel and Albert Gregory, of Florida State Parks, Office of Park Planning, were very helpful in proposal discussions and meetings, scoping out the foci of the project, and various budget discussions. Later, Adam Straubinger and Meghan Mesler became our points of contact for the project deadline extension, deliverable submissions, review of the final report, and final processing. We would especially like to acknowledge the Rainbow River residents and visitors who shared their thoughts with us throughout the study. We hope this study will contribute to maintaining or enhancing the quality of their river experiences in the future. We thank them all! CC and SH i TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................................i Table of Contents .........................................................................................................................................ii List of Tables .................................................................................................................................................iv List of Figures ................................................................................................................................................vi Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................................ix Key Questions ....................................................................................................................................xviii Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................1 Objectives ...........................................................................................................................................1 Literature Review .........................................................................................................................................3 Methods .......................................................................................................................................................12 Task 1 - Type, location, and quantity of recreational use ........................................................... 12 User Count Methods ........................................................................................................ 12 Intervening Factors .......................................................................................................... 15 Task 2 - Geographic and temporal differences in aquatic plant communities .................................18 Task 3 - Human activity and water quality relationships ..................................................................23 Task 4 - Human activity and aquatic plant relationships...................................................................26 Net Sampling ...........................................................................................................................26 Direct Observation of the Effects of Motor Boating on the Aquatic Plants ...........................28 Prop Scars ................................................................................................................................29 SCUBA ......................................................................................................................................32 ii Results...........................................................................................................................................................33 Task 1 - Type, location, and quantity of recreational use ........................................................... 33 Task 2 - Geographic and temporal differences in aquatic plant communities .................................48 Task 3 - Human activity and water quality relationships ..................................................................61 Task 4 - Human activity and aquatic plant relationships...................................................................71 Net Sampling ...........................................................................................................................71 Direct Observation of the Effects of Motor Boating on the Aquatic Plants ...........................89 Prop Scars ................................................................................................................................95 SCUBA ......................................................................................................................................104 Management Suggestions for the River ......................................................................................................107 Overview ..........................................................................................................................................107 Management....................................................................................................................................108 References ....................................................................................................................................................111 Appendices are available as a separate document in support of this final report. These include: • Individual grid data for each of the 26 plant transects sampled in May 2011, September/October 2011, and April 2012, • Recreational user count data, collected during each of the 10 days during which water chemistry and drifting plant net sampling was conducted, • Total, inorganic, and organic suspended solid data for each of the 10 days during which water was collected concurrent with recreational user counts and drifting plant net sampling, • Weight of individual plant species, collected by each net and time, during each of the 10 days during which drifting plants were collected concurrent with recreational user count and water sampling, • Boater observation data, including date of observation, boat type, length, engine HP, amount of damage observed, and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Comprehensive River Management Plan
    September 2011 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WEKIVA WILD AND SCENIC RIVER SYSTEM Florida __________________________________________________________________________ The Wekiva Wild and Scenic River System was designated by an act of Congress on October 13, 2000 (Public Law 106-299). The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 USC 1247) requires that each designated river or river segment must have a comprehensive river management plan developed. The Wekiva system has no approved plan in place. This document examines two alternatives for managing the Wekiva River System. It also analyzes the impacts of implementing each of the alternatives. Alternative A consists of the existing river management and trends and serves as a basis for comparison in evaluating the other alternative. It does not imply that no river management would occur. The concept for river management under alternative B would be an integrated program of goals, objectives, and actions for protecting and enhancing each outstandingly remarkable value. A coordinated effort among the many public agencies and entities would be needed to implement this alternative. Alternative B is the National Park Service’s and the Wekiva River System Advisory Management Committee’s preferred alternative. Implementing the preferred alternative (B) would result in coordinated multiagency actions that aid in the conservation or improvement of scenic values, recreation opportunities, wildlife and habitat, historic and cultural resources, and water quality and quantity. This would result in several long- term beneficial impacts on these outstandingly remarkable values. This Environmental Assessment was distributed to various agencies and interested organizations and individuals for their review and comment in August 2010, and has been revised as appropriate to address comments received.
    [Show full text]
  • Silver Springs and Upper Silver River and Rainbow Spring Group and Rainbow River Basin BMAP
    Silver Springs and Upper Silver River and Rainbow Spring Group and Rainbow River Basin Management Action Plan Division of Environmental Assessment and Restoration Water Quality Restoration Program Florida Department of Environmental Protection with participation from the Silver and Rainbow Stakeholders June 2018 2600 Blair Stone Rd. Tallahassee, FL 32399 floridadep.gov Silver Springs and Upper Silver River and Rainbow Spring Group and Rainbow River Basin Management Action Plan, June 2018 Acknowledgments The Florida Department of Environmental Protection adopted the Basin Management Action Plan by Secretarial Order as part of its statewide watershed management approach to restore and protect Florida's water quality. The plan was developed in coordination with stakeholders, identified below, with participation from affected local, regional, and state governmental interests; elected officials and citizens; and private interests. Florida Department of Environmental Protection Noah Valenstein, Secretary Table A-1. Silver Springs and Upper Silver River and Rainbow Spring Group and Rainbow River stakeholders Type of Entity Name Agricultural Producers Marion County Alachua County Lake County Sumter County Levy County Putnam County City of Ocala City of Dunnellon City of Belleview Responsible Stakeholders The Villages On Top of the World Town of McIntosh City of Williston Town of Bronson City of Micanopy City of Hawthorne Town of Lady Lake City of Fruitland Park Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Florida Department of Environmental Protection, including Silver Springs State Park and Rainbow Springs State Park, Oklawaha River Aquatic Preserve, and Rainbow Springs Aquatic Preserve Florida Department of Health Florida Department of Health in Marion County Responsible Agencies Florida Department of Health in Alachua County Florida Department of Health in Levy County Florida Department of Transportation District 2 Florida Department of Transportation District 5 St.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Public Workshop for Minimum Flows and Levels Priority Lists and Schedules for the CFWI Area
    Joint Public Workshop for Minimum Flows and Levels Priority Lists and Schedules for the CFWI Area St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) September 5, 2019 St. Cloud, Florida 1 Agenda 1. Introductions and Background……... Don Medellin, SFWMD 2. SJRWMD MFLs Priority List……Andrew Sutherland, SJRWMD 3. SWFWMD MFLs Priority List..Doug Leeper, SWFWMD 4. SFWMD MFLs Priority List……Don Medellin, SFWMD 5. Stakeholder comments 6. Adjourn 2 Statutory Directive for MFLs Water management districts or DEP must establish MFLs that set the limit or level… “…at which further withdrawals would be significantly harmful to the water resources or ecology of the area.” Section 373.042(1), Florida Statutes 3 Statutory Directive for Reservations Water management districts may… “…reserve from use by permit applicants, water in such locations and quantities, and for such seasons of the year, as in its judgment may be required for the protection of fish and wildlife or the public health and safety.” Section 373.223(4), Florida Statutes 4 District Priority Lists and Schedules Meet Statutory and Rule Requirements ▪ Prioritization is based on the importance of waters to the State or region, and the existence of or potential for significant harm ▪ Includes waters experiencing or reasonably expected to experience adverse impacts ▪ MFLs the districts will voluntarily subject to independent scientific peer review are identified ▪ Proposed reservations are identified ▪ Listed water bodies that have the potential to be affected by withdrawals in an adjacent water management district are identified 5 2019 Draft Priority List and Schedule ▪ Annual priority list and schedule required by statute for each district ▪ Presented to respective District Governing Boards for approval ▪ Submitted to DEP for review by Nov.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wild, Wonderful Withlacoochee January 18-23, 2018
    The Wild, Wonderful Withlacoochee January 18-23, 2018 Start: Marsh Bend Outlet Park in Lake Panasoffkee End: Bird Creek Park on the Gulf of Mexico, just west of Yankeetown Total Distance: 57-69 miles Full Trip Fees: Includes camping, meals, and shuttle. $525/adults $500/seniors (65+) and college students $475/youth 8-17 free/children under 8 Paddle Florida Lite (4 or fewer days): $110/day (includes camping and meals, but not shuttle) Registration Deadline: January 4, 2018 or when trip capacity of 60 paddlers is reached. Official Outfitters: Rainbow River Canoe & Kayak or Aardvark’s Florida Kayak Company Shuttle Details: Paddlers will park their vehicles at the launch point, Marsh Bend Outlet Park in Lake Panasoffkee, for the duration of the trip. At trip’s end, paddlers and their boats will be shuttled back to vehicles at Marsh Bend Outlet Park. There is no week-long parking option at the trip’s ending point at Bird Creek Park. Trip Itinerary: Day Lunch Stop Lunch Miles Camp Site Daily Miles 1 N/A N/A Marsh Bend Outlet Park 0 2 Rutland Boat Ramp 5.5 Potts Preserve 12 3 In camp Variable Potts Preserve 0-12 4 Grey Eagle Boat Ramp 10 Rainbow Springs State Park 19 5 Goldendale Boat Ramp 9 Inglis Lock & Dam 17 6 N/A N/A END: Bird Creek Park 9 57-69 Day 1/Thursday, January 18: Marsh Bend Outlet Park, Lake Panasoffkee Paddling Miles: 0 Our trip begins at Sumter County's Marsh Bend Outlet Park in Lake Panasoffkee, where we’ll camp the first night.
    [Show full text]
  • Geohydrology of the Cross-Florida Barge Canal Area with Special Reference to the Ocala Vicinity
    GEOHYDROLOGY OF THE CROSS- FLORIDA BARGE CANAL AREA WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE OCALA VICINITY By Glen L. Faulkner U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report I-73 Prepared in cooperation with: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS Tallahassee, FL 1973 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Vincent E. McKelvey, Director The use of firm, trade, and brand names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. For additional information Copies of this report can be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services Suite 3015 Box 25286 227 N. Bronough Street Denver, CO 80225-0286 Tallahassee, FL 32301 800-ASK-USGS Additional information about water resources in Florida is available on the World Wide Web at http://fl.water.usgs.gov CONTENTS Preface............................................................................................................. ix Conclusions...................................................................................................... 1 Abstract ............................................................................................................ 4 Introduction....................................................................................................... 7 Purpose and scope..................................................................................... 7 Acknowledgments......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Status of the Aquatic Plant Maintenance Program in Florida Public Waters
    Status of the Aquatic Plant Maintenance Program in Florida Public Waters Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2006 - 2007 Executive Summary This report was prepared in accordance with §369.22 (7), Florida Statutes, to provide an annual assessment of the control achieved and funding necessary to manage nonindigenous aquatic plants in intercounty waters. The authority of the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) as addressed in §369.20 (5), Florida Statutes, extends to the management of nuisance populations of all aquatic plants, both indigenous and nonindigenous, and in all waters accessible to the general public. The aquatic plant management program in Florida’s public waters involves complex operational and financial interactions between state, federal and local governments as well as private sector compa- nies. A summary of plant acres controlled in sovereignty public waters and associated expenditures contracted or monitored by the DEP during Fiscal Year 2006-2007 is presented in the tables on page 42 of this report. Florida’s aquatic plant management program mission is to reduce negative impacts from invasive nonindigenous plants like water hyacinth, water lettuce and hydrilla to conserve the multiple uses and functions of public lakes and rivers. Invasive plants infest 95 percent of the 437 public waters inventoried in 2007 that comprise 1.25 million acres of fresh water where fishing alone is valued at more than $1.5 billion annually. Once established, eradicating invasive plants is difficult or impossible and very expensive; therefore, continuous maintenance is critical to sustaining navigation, flood control and recreation while conserving native plant habitat on sovereignty state lands at the lowest feasible cost.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Recreation on the Submersed Aquatic Plant Community of Rainbow River, Florida MICHAEL T
    J. Aquat. Plant Manage. 34: 53-56 Effects of Recreation on the Submersed Aquatic Plant Community of Rainbow River, Florida MICHAEL T. MUMMA, C. E. CICHRA AND J. T. SOWARDS1 ABSTRACT field 1990b, Mumma 1996), and stable water temperature and flow (Ferguson et al. 1947, Odum 1957a). One of the Concurrent sampling of drifting plants and upstream rec- largest of these springs, Rainbow Springs (29°06’08” N., reational use on Rainbow River, a large spring-fed river in 82°26’16” W), has an average discharge of 20.1 cubic meters central Florida, showed the biomass of drifting (damaged) per second (USGS 1994) and forms Rainbow River, the third plants to be significantly correlated (r = 0.65 to 0.68) to largest spring-river in Florida and the eighth largest reported upstream recreational activity. Intercorrelation among recre- in the world (Rosenau et al. 1977). Rainbow River is a valu- ational user groups (boats, tubers, canoes) makes it impossi- able aesthetic, recreational, and economic resource to the ble to attribute plant damage to a single type of recreational local area and the entire state, attracting over 30,000 visitors activity. Recreation was estimated to remove 0.000015 to each year (Pridgen et al. 1993, Holland and Cichra 1994). 0.000034 percent of upstream plant biomass during each The primary recreational activities occurring on the river are hour of peak recreational activity. In addition, quadrat sam- motorboating, canoeing, and tubing, during which people pling indicated that areas which received higher amounts of float downstream on tire innertubes. During these recre- recreational use did not have significantly lower plant cover- ational activities, people might tear or uproot submersed age or leaf densities.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Rainbow River Vegetation Evaluation
    2011 Rainbow River Vegetation Evaluation Prepared for: Southwest Florida Water Management District June 2012 Prepared by: Atkins North America, Inc. and Debra Childs Woithe, Inc. 2011 Rainbow River Vegetation Evaluation Table of Contents Chapter Pages Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................ 5 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 7 1.1. Overview................................................................................................................................................ 7 1.2. Project Area Description........................................................................................................................ 7 1.3. Previous Vegetation Mapping Efforts .................................................................................................... 8 1.4. Spring Flow during the 1996 through 2011 Period ............................................................................... 9 2. Methods ............................................................................................................................................... 10 2.1. Objective................................................................................................................................................ 10 2.2. Establish New Base Map .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PDF of the Organizational Sign-On
    Florida Defenders of the Environment, Inc. “Working to protect Florida’s environment since 1969” 309 SR 26 P.O. Box 357086 Melrose, Florida 32666 Gainesville, Florida 32635 www.fladefenders.org www.facebook.com/floridadefenders (352) 475-1119 April 4, 2019 Governor Ron DeSantis State of Florida The Capitol 400 S. Monroe St. Tallahassee, FL 32399-0001 Subject: Restoration of the Ocklawaha River Dear Governor DeSantis, The undersigned organizations respectfully request you to move forward with the long-delayed restoration of the Ocklawaha River by breaching the Kirkpatrick Dam and letting the river flow free. The reasons to restore the river are many, both ecological and economic. A recently completed study by economists at the University of Florida1 found that restoring the river would have a beneficial economic impact for Florida. Restoration will reconnect many thousands of acres of wetlands, both upstream and downstream of the dam. These wetlands are essential for protecting clean water. Restoration will increase natural biodiversity. It will save freshwater now lost by evaporation and restore freshwater flows to the St. Johns River. A free- flowing river is vital for restoration of Silver Springs. Restoration of the Ocklawaha will provide essential cold weather refuge for many hundreds of manatees2. Cold weather refuge for manatees is an increasingly critical issue due to both the decommissioning older design power plants as well as decreasing flows at many Florida springs. 1 Borisova, Tatiana, Xiang Bi, Alan Hodges, and Stephen Holland, Nov 11, 2017, Economic Importance and Public Perceptions for Water Resource Management of the Ocklawaha River; University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of Activities Conducted Under the Cooperative Aquatic Plant Control Program in Florida Public Waters for Fiscal Year 2012-2013
    Annual Report of Activities Conducted under the Cooperative Aquatic Plant Control Program in Florida Public Waters for Fiscal Year 2012-2013 Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Invasive Plant Management Section Submitted by: FL Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Invasive Plant Management Section 3900 Commonwealth Blvd. MS705 Tallahassee, FL 32399 Phone: 850-617-9420 Fax: 850-922-1249 Annual Report of Activities Conducted under the Cooperative Aquatic Plant Control Program in Florida Public Waters for Fiscal Year 2012-2013 This report was prepared in accordance with §369.22 (7), Florida Statutes, to provide an annual summary of plants treated and funding necessary to manage aquatic plants in public waters. The Cooperative Aquatic Plant Control Program administered by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) in Florida’s public waters involves complex operational and financial interactions between state, federal and local governments as well as private sector companies. FWC’s aquatic plant management program mission is to reduce negative impacts from invasive nonindigenous plants like water hyacinth, water lettuce and hydrilla to conserve the multiple uses and functions of public lakes and rivers. Invasive plants infest 96% of Florida’s 451 public waters inventoried in 2013 that comprise 1.26 million acres of fresh water. Once established, eradicating invasive plants is difficult or impossible and very expensive; therefore, continuous maintenance is critical to keep invasive plants at low levels to
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Designated Paddling Trails Withlacoochee River South
    Tidewater «¬40 F ll o r ii d a D e s ii g n a tt e d ¤£19 )"336 P a d d ll ii n g T r a ii ll s ¯ M a p 7 Chatmire SR«¬ 200 Lake Rousseau W ii tt h ll a c o o c h e e R ii v e r Dunnellon M a p 6 )"40 )"484 S o u tt h Summerfield )"488 «¬200 Citrus Springs 475  Inglis Stokes Ferry )" Citronelle )"42 Holder M a p 5 Pedro Dallas )"495 Ledonia Mincoll ¤£301 )"466 Beverly Hills Oxford Crystal River Hernando )"44 )"486 Moreland Park 581 )" «¬44 Wildwood «¬44 M a p 4 Inverness 494 Lecanto )" £19 £98 Lake Panasoffkee ¤¤ )"490 ¨¦§75 41 Homosassa Springs ¤£ 470 )" Coleman Homosassa )"491 M a p 3 Floral City Lake Panasoffkee Sumterville Sugarmill Woods Jumeau )"581 )"475 Chassahowitzka )"39 )"480 Pineola )"48 Wahoo Oak Forest Bushnell Istachatta ¤£98 476 Shands )" S M a p 2 19 U Nobleton M a p 2 ¤£ N Lake Lindsey C ¤£301 O A 476 Saint Catherine Webster S )" T P K 480 W )" Y «¬471 )"485 Brooksville Rerdell Brookridge M a p 1 Bayport 50 «¬50 «¬ Weeki Wachee 98 ¤£ Ridge Manor 41 Berkeley Powell )" Spring Hill Spring Lake Talisman US 41 TimbeDr ePsinigensated Paddling Trail ¤£ 581 CR 585 )" Trilby Hernando Beach )" Wetlands CR)" 574 )"575 Lacoochee Masaryktown Aripeka Dixie Water CR)" 578 Blanton Designated Paddling Trail Index 0 3 6 12 Miles W ii tt h ll a c o o c h e e R ii v e rr S o u tt h P a d d ll ii n g T rr a ii ll M a p 1 ¯ C R O O Withlacoochee M State Forest R I T A L R D ¤£98 «¬50 Rital Cypress Lake Preserve H E R N A N D O W CORTEZ BLVD Ridge Manor i 50 t h «¬ l a c o o c h e e 301 S ¤£ t a t e T r a i l Withlacoochee State Forest ¤£98
    [Show full text]
  • Florida State Record Bass
    Florida State Record Bass When Ashish dodge his curculionidae subjectified not cohesively enough, is Mike lobulate? How shellproof is Ravil when geophagous and pre Sutherland ports some psocid? How lamellar is Husain when jim-dandy and Carthaginian Piggy detruncate some Aberdare? Add your email address will switch to be informed fdep to catch with the other factors have the state record bass guy is our content Florida due to their very strict survival requirements. Aron Kastern on Lake Superior near Ashland, Wisconsin where they go after whitefish on ice. Georgia and are completely overlooked. UGLY of this issue. Billy Rotne and Tom Olivo were fishing in Mosquito Lagoon. Fishing is prohibited from the headwaters of Rainbow Springs to a point one mile downstream on Rainbow River within Marion County. Get Auburn Tigers NCAA Basketball News, schedule, recruiting information. NATURAL RESOURCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, economic revitalization, and historic and cultural preservation. Cookie Notice: To help personalize content, tailor and measure advertising and provide a safer experience, we use cookies. Santa Fe Road in Columbia County. Following genetic and other analyses, it is now believed that redeye bass do not exist in Florida. On a recent trip to Lake Okeechobee, Fla. Indeed, for the past two consecutive years, the Oklahoma record largemouth bass has changed hands. The role genetics plays in bass growth rates within the natural population in a waterbody is not well understood. Shrimp like this one live in the subterranean channels deep under the springs. Blackwater Hatchery near Holt. Acquiring the otolith from this fish was extremely valuable as samples from larger and older fish are rare.
    [Show full text]