River Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

River Report LOWER SJR REPORT 2016 River Report State of the Lower 201620 St. Johns15 River Basin, Florida Water Quality Fisheries Aquatic Life Contaminants Prepared for: Environmental Protection Board, City of Jacksonville, Florida St. James Building, 117 West Duval Street Jacksonville, Florida 32202 By: University of NortH Florida, 1 UNF Drive, Jacksonville, Florida 32224 Jacksonville University, 2800 University Blvd N., Jacksonville, Florida 32211 Cover image photographer: Michael J. Canella, courtesy of Daniel L. Schafer and www.unfedu.floridahistoryonline, digitally manipulated. LOWER SJR REPORT 2016 Preface The State of the River Report is the result of a collaborative effort of a team of academic researchers from Jacksonville University, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL, Valdosta State University, Valdosta, GA, and Florida Southern College, Lakeland, FL. The report was supported by the Environmental Protection Board of the City of Jacksonville and the River Branch Foundation. The purpose of the project is to review various previously collected data and literature about the river and to place it into a format that is informative and readable to the general public. The report consists of four parts – the website (http://www.sjrreport.com), the brochure, the full report, and an appendix. The brochure provides a brief summary of the status and trends of each item or indicator (i.e., water quality, fisheries, etc.) that was evaluated for the river. The full report and appendix were produced to provide more to those interested. In the development of these documents, many different sources of data were examined, including data from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, St. Johns River Water Management District, Fish and Wildlife Commission, City of Jacksonville, individual researchers, and others. The researchers reviewed data addressing many different aspects of the Lower St. Johns River. The most statistically rigorous and stringent research available was used to assemble the report. When a draft of all documents was produced, an extensive review process was undertaken to ensure accuracy, balance, and clarity. We are extremely grateful to the following scientists and interested parties who provided invaluable assistance in improving our document. Vince Seibold Maria Mark, Timucuan Trail Parks Foundation Betsy Deuerling City of Jacksonville Stephan Nix, University of North Florida (UNF) John Flowe, City of Jacksonville Kelly Smith, UNF Melissa Long, City of Jacksonville Dale Casamatta, UNF John Hendrickson, St. Johns River Water Management Robert Richardson, UNF District (SJRWMD) Maia McGuire, University of Florida Sea Grant John Higman, SJRWMD A. Quinton White, Jacksonville University (JU) Dean Dobberfuhl, SJRWMD Charles Jacoby, SJRWMD Teresa Monson, SJRWMD Ted Lange, FWRI Al Canepa, SJRWMD Douglas Adams, FWRI Derek Busby, SJRWMD Wayne Magley, DEP Russ Brodie, Florida Fish and Wildlife Research Anita Nash, DEP Institute (FWRI) Kevin O’Donnell, DEP Tony DiGirolamo, FWRI Julie Espy, DEP Justin Solomon, FWRI Daryll Joyner, DEP Christopher Swanson, FWRI Donald Axelrad, DEP Lee Banks, Florida Department of Environmental Barbara Donner, DEP Protection (DEP) Kendra Goff, Florida Department of Health Patrick O’Connor, DEP Jan Landsberg, FWRI Lisa Rinaman, St. Johns River Riverkeeper Robert Storm Burks, SJRWMD Paul Steinbrecher, JEA Matthew Waters, Valdosta State University Ed Cordova, JEA Gary Weise Tiffany Busby, Wildwood Consulting Marcy Policastro, Wildwood Consulting Mike McManus, The Nature Conservancy Richard Bryant, National Park Service Mark Middlebrook, St. Johns River Alliance We have appreciated the opportunity to work with the environmental community to educate the public about the unique problems of the Lower St. Johns River, and the efforts that are under way to restore our river to a healthy ecosystem. ii LOWER SJR REPORT 2016 We would also like to thank the following undergraduate students for their contributions toward the development of this report: Laura Elston, JU Jingu Gene Kang, JU Samuel Dixie, JU Andrea Pertoso, UNF Bobbi Estabrook, JU Ryan Keith, JU Anthony Flock, JU Katie Anagnostou, UNF Jessica Fernquist, JU Rebecca Lucas, JU Sara Debellis, JU Sydney Payton, JU Jessica Goodman, JU Nicole Martin, JU Alexis Crouch, JU Julia Goodman, JU David Roueche, JU Keenan Carpenter, JU Julie Hammon, JU Logan Wood, JU Krystal Dannenhoffer, JU Leon Huderson, III, JU Jenna Manis, JU Emma Fowler, JU Sincerely, Gerry Pinto, Principal Investigator, JU Radha Pyati, Principal Investigator, UNF Nisse Goldberg, JU Peter Bacopoulos, UNF Anthony Ouellette, JU Brian Zoellner, UNF Gretchen Bielmyer-Fraser, Valdosta State University An-Phong Le, Florida Southern College Ray Oldakowski, author of Highlight section, “Survey Research on Behaviors and Opinions Regarding the St. Johns River and Related Duval County Waterways” Niki Spadaro, Technical Editor iii LOWER SJR REPORT 2016 Executive Summary The Ninth State of the River Report is a summary and analysis of the health of the Lower St. Johns River Basin (LSJRB) available at http://www.sjrreport.com. The Report addresses four main areas of river health: water quality; fisheries; aquatic life; and contaminants. This year’s assessment of the LSJRB shows positives and negatives as noted below. Over the years, some indicators have improved, others have worsened, and still others have remained unchanged. The trends of some indicators have improved: • Total nitrogen levels in the mainstem have declined. • Overall air emissions of toxic chemicals in the region are down. The trends of some indicators have worsened: • Salinity has gradually risen over the last two decades and is expected to continue its increase, with potential negative effects on submerged aquatic vegetation and the aquatic life that depends upon it. • Overall surface water discharges of toxic chemicals in the region have increased. • Nonnative species increased this year to 75 total species, and the spread of lionfish and Cuban treefrogs is of particular concern due to their impacts on the native ecosystem. The trends of many indicators are unchanged: • For dissolved oxygen, there was a change in water quality criterion. Although levels of DO remain largely unchanged over several years, these levels are considered satisfactory when using the new criterion based upon percent oxygen saturation. • Phosphorus levels in both mainstem and tributaries remain unsatisfactory. • Chlorophyll-a, an indicator of harmful algal blooms, continues to exhibit high levels, particularly in the saltwater reaches of the LSJR mainstem. However, recent years show possible improvements. • Fecal coliform levels remain above water quality criteria in many tributaries. • Submerged aquatic vegetation has experienced some very recent regrowth due to rainfall, but the long-term trend is uncertain. • Most finfish and invertebrate species are not in danger of overfishing, with the exception of channel and white catfish and Penaeid shrimp, which both have the potential to be overfished in the near future. • Threatened and endangered species are stable. • Wetlands continue to be lost to development pressures. This year’s Report contains a Highlight section by guest contributor Professor Ray Oldakowski of Jacksonville University on survey research about behaviors and opinions of area residents regarding the St. Johns River. The survey is ongoing, and current results are reported from a convenience sample of 373 individuals. Of this group, 70% had used a water access facility, such as a boat ramp or riverwalk, within the last month, and two-thirds felt that additional water access facilities were needed in Duval County. The full Report provides an in-depth look at many aspects of the LSJRB. Section 1 provides an overview of the Report and the basin and describes the basin’s landscape, human occupancy, and environmental management spanning the 1800s to early 2016. Section 2 describes water quality in terms of dissolved oxygen, nutrients, algal blooms, turbidity, fecal coliform, tributaries, and salinity. Section 3 addresses the state of the river’s finfish and invertebrate fisheries. Section 4 examines the condition of aquatic life, encompassing plants, animals, and wetlands. Section 5 discusses conditions and importance of contaminants in the LSJRB. These contaminants include air and water emissions of chemicals in the LSJRB, as reported to EPA Toxics Release Inventory; mercury, the subject of a new statewide reduction effort; metals, in both sediments and the water column; polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; polychlorinated biphenyls; and pesticides. iv LOWER SJR REPORT 2016 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AEF American Eagle Foundation MRZ Mesohaline Riverine Zone AKA Also Known As MS4 Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System ATSDR Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease Registry NAP Non-Algal Particulates AWS Alternate Water Supply NAS Nonindigenous Aquatic Species BMAP Basin Management Action Plan NAS JAX Naval Air Station Jacksonville BOD Biochemical Oxygen Demand NMFS National Marine Fisheries Service CCA Chromated Copper Arsenate NOAA National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration CDC Center for Disease Control NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System CDOM Colored Dissolved Organic Material NRC National Research Council CFR Code of Federal Regulations NPS National Park Service COJ City of Jacksonville NTU Nephelometric Turbidity Units CSA Continental Shelf Associates PAHs Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons CWA Clean Water Act PCBs Polychlorinated
Recommended publications
  • Integrated Report
    FINAL Integrated Water Quality Assessment for Florida: 2016 Sections 303(d), 305(b), and 314 Report and Listing Update Division of Environmental Assessment and Restoration Florida Department of Environmental Protection June 2016 2600 Blair Stone Rd. Tallahassee, FL 32399-2400 FINAL 2016 Integrated Water Quality Assessment for Florida, June 2016 This Page Intentionally Blank. Page 2 of 298 FINAL 2016 Integrated Water Quality Assessment for Florida, June 2016 Letter to Floridians Page 3 of 298 FINAL 2016 Integrated Water Quality Assessment for Florida, June 2016 Acknowledgments This document was prepared by staff in the following divisions and offices of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP): Division of Environmental Assessment and Restoration − Bureau of Laboratories: o Biology Section − Water Quality Standards Program: o Standards Development Section o Aquatic Ecology and Quality Assurance Section − Water Quality Assessment Program: o Watershed Assessment Section o Watershed Monitoring Section − Water Quality Evaluation and Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) Program: o Ground Water Management Section o Watershed Evaluation and TMDL Section − Water Quality Restoration Program: o Nonpoint Source Management Section o Watershed Planning and Coordination Section Division of Water Resource Management − Domestic Wastewater Program − Industrial Wastewater Program − State Revolving Fund Program − Engineering, Hydrology, and Geology Program − Submerged Lands and Environmental Resources Coordination Program − Water Compliance Assurance Program Office of Water Policy Office of Intergovernmental Programs In addition, DEP thanks staff at the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Florida Department of Health, and Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services for their valuable help in updating sections of this report, and the Southwest, Suwannee River, and St.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive River Management Plan
    September 2011 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WEKIVA WILD AND SCENIC RIVER SYSTEM Florida __________________________________________________________________________ The Wekiva Wild and Scenic River System was designated by an act of Congress on October 13, 2000 (Public Law 106-299). The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 USC 1247) requires that each designated river or river segment must have a comprehensive river management plan developed. The Wekiva system has no approved plan in place. This document examines two alternatives for managing the Wekiva River System. It also analyzes the impacts of implementing each of the alternatives. Alternative A consists of the existing river management and trends and serves as a basis for comparison in evaluating the other alternative. It does not imply that no river management would occur. The concept for river management under alternative B would be an integrated program of goals, objectives, and actions for protecting and enhancing each outstandingly remarkable value. A coordinated effort among the many public agencies and entities would be needed to implement this alternative. Alternative B is the National Park Service’s and the Wekiva River System Advisory Management Committee’s preferred alternative. Implementing the preferred alternative (B) would result in coordinated multiagency actions that aid in the conservation or improvement of scenic values, recreation opportunities, wildlife and habitat, historic and cultural resources, and water quality and quantity. This would result in several long- term beneficial impacts on these outstandingly remarkable values. This Environmental Assessment was distributed to various agencies and interested organizations and individuals for their review and comment in August 2010, and has been revised as appropriate to address comments received.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Sea-Level Rise on Salinity in the Lower St. Johns River and the Associated Physics
    University of North Florida UNF Digital Commons UNF Graduate Theses and Dissertations Student Scholarship 2016 The Influence of Sea-Level Rise on Salinity in the Lower St. Johns River and the Associated Physics Teddy Mulamba University of North Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/etd Part of the Civil Engineering Commons, and the Other Civil and Environmental Engineering Commons Suggested Citation Mulamba, Teddy, "The Influence of Sea-Level Rise on Salinity in the Lower St. Johns River and the Associated Physics" (2016). UNF Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 714. https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/etd/714 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at UNF Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in UNF Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UNF Digital Commons. For more information, please contact Digital Projects. © 2016 All Rights Reserved THE INFLUENCE OF SEA-LEVEL RISE ON SALINITY IN THE LOWER ST. JOHNS RIVER AND THE ASSOCIATED PHYSICS by Teddy Mulamba A Thesis submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Civil Engineering UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA COLLEGE OF COMPUTING, ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION December, 2016 Unpublished work c Teddy Mulamba The Thesis titled "Influence of Sea-Level Rise on Salinity in The Lower St Johns River and The Associated Physics" is approved: ___________________________ _______________________ Dr. Don T. Resio, PhD ______________________________ _______________________ Dr. Peter Bacopoulos, PhD __________________________ _______________________ Dr. William Dally, PhD, PE Accepted for the School of Engineering: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Silver Springs and Upper Silver River and Rainbow Spring Group and Rainbow River Basin BMAP
    Silver Springs and Upper Silver River and Rainbow Spring Group and Rainbow River Basin Management Action Plan Division of Environmental Assessment and Restoration Water Quality Restoration Program Florida Department of Environmental Protection with participation from the Silver and Rainbow Stakeholders June 2018 2600 Blair Stone Rd. Tallahassee, FL 32399 floridadep.gov Silver Springs and Upper Silver River and Rainbow Spring Group and Rainbow River Basin Management Action Plan, June 2018 Acknowledgments The Florida Department of Environmental Protection adopted the Basin Management Action Plan by Secretarial Order as part of its statewide watershed management approach to restore and protect Florida's water quality. The plan was developed in coordination with stakeholders, identified below, with participation from affected local, regional, and state governmental interests; elected officials and citizens; and private interests. Florida Department of Environmental Protection Noah Valenstein, Secretary Table A-1. Silver Springs and Upper Silver River and Rainbow Spring Group and Rainbow River stakeholders Type of Entity Name Agricultural Producers Marion County Alachua County Lake County Sumter County Levy County Putnam County City of Ocala City of Dunnellon City of Belleview Responsible Stakeholders The Villages On Top of the World Town of McIntosh City of Williston Town of Bronson City of Micanopy City of Hawthorne Town of Lady Lake City of Fruitland Park Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Florida Department of Environmental Protection, including Silver Springs State Park and Rainbow Springs State Park, Oklawaha River Aquatic Preserve, and Rainbow Springs Aquatic Preserve Florida Department of Health Florida Department of Health in Marion County Responsible Agencies Florida Department of Health in Alachua County Florida Department of Health in Levy County Florida Department of Transportation District 2 Florida Department of Transportation District 5 St.
    [Show full text]
  • Decision Document Regarding Florida Department of Environmental Protection's Section 303(D) List Amendments for Basin Group
    DECISION DOCUMENT REGARDING FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION’S SECTION 303(d) LIST AMENDMENTS FOR BASIN GROUP THREE Prepared by the Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4 Water Management Division May 12, 2010 Florida §303(d) List Decision Document May 12, 2010 Table of Contents I. Executive Summary 3 II. Statutory and Regulatory Background 6 A. Identification of Water Quality Limited Segments (WQLSs) for Inclusion on the Section 303(d) List 6 B. Consideration of Existing and Readily Available Water Quality-Related Data and Information 6 C. Priority Ranking 7 III. Analysis of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection’s Submission 7 A. Florida’s Group Three 2010 Update 8 1. Florida’s Water Quality Standards and Section 303(d) List Development 8 2. List Development Methodology and Data Assessment 10 3. Public Participation Process 11 4. Consideration of Existing and Readily Available Water Quality-Related Data and Information 12 B. Review of FDEP’s Identification of Waters 14 1. Review of FDEP’s Data Guidelines 15 2. No Pollutant Identified for Impairment 18 3. Aquatic Life Use Impairment 18 4. Primary and Secondary Recreational Use Support 23 5. Fish and Shellfish Consumption Use Support 24 6. Drinking Water Use Support and Protection of Human Health 25 1 Florida §303(d) List Decision Document May 12, 2010 C. Section 303(d) List of Impaired Waters 26 1. FDEP’s Addition of Water Quality Limited Segments 26 2. Section 303(d) List Delistings 26 3. Other Pollution Control Requirements 27 4. EPA Identified Waters 30 5. Priority Ranking and Targeting 30 IV.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Public Workshop for Minimum Flows and Levels Priority Lists and Schedules for the CFWI Area
    Joint Public Workshop for Minimum Flows and Levels Priority Lists and Schedules for the CFWI Area St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) September 5, 2019 St. Cloud, Florida 1 Agenda 1. Introductions and Background……... Don Medellin, SFWMD 2. SJRWMD MFLs Priority List……Andrew Sutherland, SJRWMD 3. SWFWMD MFLs Priority List..Doug Leeper, SWFWMD 4. SFWMD MFLs Priority List……Don Medellin, SFWMD 5. Stakeholder comments 6. Adjourn 2 Statutory Directive for MFLs Water management districts or DEP must establish MFLs that set the limit or level… “…at which further withdrawals would be significantly harmful to the water resources or ecology of the area.” Section 373.042(1), Florida Statutes 3 Statutory Directive for Reservations Water management districts may… “…reserve from use by permit applicants, water in such locations and quantities, and for such seasons of the year, as in its judgment may be required for the protection of fish and wildlife or the public health and safety.” Section 373.223(4), Florida Statutes 4 District Priority Lists and Schedules Meet Statutory and Rule Requirements ▪ Prioritization is based on the importance of waters to the State or region, and the existence of or potential for significant harm ▪ Includes waters experiencing or reasonably expected to experience adverse impacts ▪ MFLs the districts will voluntarily subject to independent scientific peer review are identified ▪ Proposed reservations are identified ▪ Listed water bodies that have the potential to be affected by withdrawals in an adjacent water management district are identified 5 2019 Draft Priority List and Schedule ▪ Annual priority list and schedule required by statute for each district ▪ Presented to respective District Governing Boards for approval ▪ Submitted to DEP for review by Nov.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources of Duval County, Florida
    Water Resources of Duval County, Florida By G.G. Phelps U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 93-4130 Prepared in cooperation with the City of Jacksonville, Florida Tallahassee, Florida 1994 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. For additional information Copies of this report can be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Earth Science Information Center Suite 3015 Open-File Reports Section 227 N. Bronough Street Box 25286, MS 517 Tallahassee, FL 32301 Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 II CONTENTS Contents Introduction ...............................................................................................................................................1 Purpose and Scope.....................................................................................................................................1 Study Area and Population........................................................................................................................2 Water Use in Duval County ......................................................................................................................4 The Hydrologic Cycle ...............................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Construction Quarterly Snapshot Work Program Consultant CEI Program
    Florida Department of Transportation 1 D2 Contractor Meeting . Phones: Silent/Off . Sign In . Handouts: . Construction Quarterly Snapshot . Work Program . Consultant CEI Program Florida Department of Transportation 2 D2 Contractor Meeting . Ananth Prasad, FTBA . Amy Tootle, State Construction Office . Terry Watson, DBE Program . Greg Evans, District Secretary . Will Watts, Director of Operations . Carrie Stanbridge, District Construction Florida Department of Transportation 3 D2 Contractor Meeting Projects Currently Under Design Florida Department of Transportation 4 Current YearConstruction Projects FY 2019 50 projects - $602.99 million PlannedConstruction Projects FY 2020 58 projects - $457.30 million FY 2021 47 projects - $242.03 million FY 2022 44 projects - $256.83 million FY 2023 31 projects - $1.28 billion FY 2024 17 projects - $326.32 million Florida Department of Transportation 5 FY 2019 Highlights 422938-6 SR 23/FCE north SR 16 to north SR 21 (Clay) ($277.5M) 10/2018 208211-8 SR 21/Blanding Blvd. CR 220 to Alley Murray (Clay) ($19.1M) 10/2018 422938-5 SR 23/FCE east CR 209 to north SR 16 (Clay) ($178.7M) 12/2018 210024-5 SR 20 SW 56th Ave. to CR 315 (Putnam) ($23.4M) 02/2019 428455-1 Jacksonville National Cemetery Access Road (Duval) ($12.8M) 05/2019 Florida Department of Transportation 6 FY 2020 Construction Plan 13 Resurfacing Projects approx. $114.1 million 8 Bridge Replacement Projects approx. $29.9 million 3 Bridge Painting & Repair approx. $8.3 million 18 Intersections, Traffic Signals, etc. approx. $37.8 million FY 2020 Highlights 439100-1 I-10 fm I-295 to I-95 (Duval) ($128.4 M) 08/2019 210024-4 SR 20 Alachua C/L to SW 56th Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1-2010 to the Charter of the City of Jacksonville
    Appendix 1-2010 to the Charter of the City of Jacksonville 2011 CITY COUNCIL DISTRICTS District 1 For a point of beginning, begin at the southwest corner of District 1 known as the centerline of the St. Johns River and the centerline of the Isaiah D. Hart Bridge; thence north and northeast along the centerline of the St. Johns River to a line south of Exchange Island; thence southeasterly along a line southwest of Exchange Island to the centerline of Dames Point Bridge; thence southerly along the centerline of Dames Point Bridge and 9A to the centerline of Southside Connector BV; thence southerly along the centerline of Southside Connector BV to the centerline of Tredinick PY to the centerline of 9A; thence southerly along the centerline of 9A to the centerline of Atlantic BV; thence westerly along the centerline of Atlantic BV to the centerline of Isaiah D. Hart Bridge; thence northwesterly along the centerline of Isaiah D. Hart Bridge to the centerline of the St. Johns River and the point of beginning. District 2 For a point of beginning, begin at the southeast corner of District 2 known as the centerline of the mouth of the St. Johns River at the Atlantic Ocean; thence westerly along the centerline of the St. Johns River to centerline of the Intercoastal Waterway/Chicopit Bay; thence southerly along the centerline of the Intercoastal Waterway to the centerline of Mt. Pleasant Creek; thence southerly along the centerline of Mt. Pleasant Creek to the centerline of Greenfield Creek; thence southeasterly along the centerline of Greenfield Creek to the centerline of Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • NORTH FLORIDA TPO Transportation Improvement Program FY 2021/22 - 2025/26
    NORTH FLORIDA TPO Transportation Improvement Program FY 2021/22 - 2025/26 Draft April 2021 North Florida TPO Transportation Improvement Program - FY 2021/22 - 2025/26 Table of Contents Section I - Executive Summary . I-1 Section II - 5 Year Summary by Fund Code . II-1 Section III - Funding Source Summary . III-1 Section A - Duval County State Highway Projects (FDOT) . A-1 Section B - Duval County State Highway / Transit Projects (JTA) . B-1 Section C - Duval County Aviation Projects . C-1 Section D - Duval County Port Projects . D-1 Section E - St. Johns County State Highway / Transit Projects (FDOT) . E-1 Section F - St. Johns County Aviation Projects . F-1 Section G - Clay County State Highway / Transit / Aviation Projects (FDOT) . G-1 Section H - Nassau County State Highway / Aviation / Port Projects (FDOT) . H-1 Section I - Area-Wide Projects . I-1 Section J - Amendments . J-1 Section A1 - Abbreviations and Acronyms (Appendix I) . A1-1 Section A2 - Path Forward 2045 LRTP Master Project List (Appendix II) . A2-1 Section A3 - Path Forward 2045 LRTP Goals and Objectives (Appendix III) . A3-1 Section A4 - 2020 List of Priority Projects (Appendix IV) . A4-1 Section A5 - Federal Obligation Reports (Appendix V) . A5-1 Section A6 - Public Comments (Appendix VI) . A6-1 Section A7 - 2045 Cost Feasible Plan YOE Total Project Cost (Appendix VII) . A7-1 Section A8 - Transportation Disadvanagted (Appendix VIII) . A8-1 Section A9 - FHWA Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division (Appendix IX) . A9-1 Section A10 – Transportation Performance Measures (Appendix X). A10-1 Section PI - Project Index . PI-1 Draft April 2021 SECTION I Executive Summary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PURPOSE The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a staged multi-year program of transportation project improvements to be implemented during the next five-year period in the North Florida TPO area which will be funded by Title 23 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wild, Wonderful Withlacoochee January 18-23, 2018
    The Wild, Wonderful Withlacoochee January 18-23, 2018 Start: Marsh Bend Outlet Park in Lake Panasoffkee End: Bird Creek Park on the Gulf of Mexico, just west of Yankeetown Total Distance: 57-69 miles Full Trip Fees: Includes camping, meals, and shuttle. $525/adults $500/seniors (65+) and college students $475/youth 8-17 free/children under 8 Paddle Florida Lite (4 or fewer days): $110/day (includes camping and meals, but not shuttle) Registration Deadline: January 4, 2018 or when trip capacity of 60 paddlers is reached. Official Outfitters: Rainbow River Canoe & Kayak or Aardvark’s Florida Kayak Company Shuttle Details: Paddlers will park their vehicles at the launch point, Marsh Bend Outlet Park in Lake Panasoffkee, for the duration of the trip. At trip’s end, paddlers and their boats will be shuttled back to vehicles at Marsh Bend Outlet Park. There is no week-long parking option at the trip’s ending point at Bird Creek Park. Trip Itinerary: Day Lunch Stop Lunch Miles Camp Site Daily Miles 1 N/A N/A Marsh Bend Outlet Park 0 2 Rutland Boat Ramp 5.5 Potts Preserve 12 3 In camp Variable Potts Preserve 0-12 4 Grey Eagle Boat Ramp 10 Rainbow Springs State Park 19 5 Goldendale Boat Ramp 9 Inglis Lock & Dam 17 6 N/A N/A END: Bird Creek Park 9 57-69 Day 1/Thursday, January 18: Marsh Bend Outlet Park, Lake Panasoffkee Paddling Miles: 0 Our trip begins at Sumter County's Marsh Bend Outlet Park in Lake Panasoffkee, where we’ll camp the first night.
    [Show full text]
  • Pottsburg Julington Fecal Coliform TMDL
    FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Division of Environmental Assessment and Restoration, Bureau of Watershed Restoration NORTHEAST DISTRICT • LOWER ST. JOHNS BASIN Final TMDL Report Fecal Coliform TMDL for Pottsburg Creek (WBID 2265B) and Julington Creek (WBID 2351) Kyeongsik Rhew September 2009 Final TMDL Report: Lower St. Johns Basin, Pottsburg Creek (WBID 2265B) and Julington Creek (WBID 2351), Fecal Coliform, September 2009 Acknowledgments This Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) analysis could not have been accomplished without significant contributions from staff in the Florida Department of Environmental Protection’s Northeast District Office, Watershed Assessment Section, and Watershed Evaluation and TMDL Section. Editorial assistance provided by Jan Mandrup-Poulsen and Linda Lord. For additional information on the watershed management approach and impaired waters in the Lower St Johns River, contact: Amy Tracy Florida Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Watershed Restoration Watershed Planning and Coordination Section 2600 Blair Stone Road, Mail Station 3565 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2400 Email: [email protected] Phone: (850) 245–8506 Fax: (850) 245–8434 Access to all data used in the development of this report can be obtained by contacting: Kyeongsik Rhew Florida Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Watershed Restoration Watershed Evaluation and TMDL Section 2600 Blair Stone Road, Mail Station 3555 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2400 Email: [email protected] Phone: (850) 245–8461 Fax:
    [Show full text]