BUSINESS BBUSINESS | 19 BUSINESS | 20 Lebanon’Sl New Fed Seen Holding Financefin Minister Rates Steady, Ending Wazni Meets Bill Purchases IMF Official by June

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

BUSINESS BBUSINESS | 19 BUSINESS | 20 Lebanon’Sl New Fed Seen Holding Financefin Minister Rates Steady, Ending Wazni Meets Bill Purchases IMF Official by June BUSINESS BUSINESSB | 19 BUSINESS | 20 Lebanon’sL new Fed seen holding fifinancen minister rates steady, ending Wazni meets bill purchases IMF official by June SUNDAY 26 JANUARY 2020 BUSINESS BRIEFS QDB’s outstanding loans to SMEs at QR6.7bn Mazaya to study MOHAMMAD SHOEB The short term financing achieve the objectives laid under the possible strategic THE PENINSULA to promote exports in 2019 country’s long-term vision. In terms of providing market access partnership with The total outstanding loans extended by stood at QR507m, while total (through Government Procurement and Al Bandari Qatar Development Bank (QDB) to SMEs financial support through Contracting Conference & Exhibition— reached a whopping QR6.7bn in 2019, Moushtarayat and other initiatives) local DOHA: Mazaya Real Estate Devel- registering a year-on-year growth of insurance policies reached SMEs were able to sign contracts for 3,233 opment has announced its intention nearly 8 percent compared to QR6.2bn at QR562m. job opportunities valued QR 1.22bn. to explore the possibility of merging loans provided in the previous year. QDB, apart from providing local as with Al Bandari Real Estate. “Mazaya The short term financing to promote well as global market access and financial would like to inform its sharehold- exports in 2019 stood at QR507m, while started giving special focus in projects support services, it also offers a lot of ers in particular and public investors total financial support through insurance related to food security in the country, other benefits such as incubation facil- in general that it have received an policies reached at QR562m. resulting in sharp rise in the number of Qatar Development Bank headquarters ities, consultancy, market intelligence, offer from Al Bandari related to the The QDB disclosed that it made SMEs related to the agriculture and food training and skill development pro- merger on January 22, 2020…. remarkable achievements in 2019 in sector, which has been growing steadily 2019, reporting a double-digit growth grammes, meetings, seminars, workshops this offer has been referred to the almost all segments of its services, since then. of 36 percent in its investments com- and exhibitions. Board of Directors for their review including financial assistance to small and In 2019, the number of QDB-sup- pared to previous year. Through its Al In 2019, QDB organized 1,442 bilateral and to take necessary action”, Maz- mid-sized enterprises (SMEs) and pro- ported food security projects witnessed Dhameen programme, the development meetings, 354 consulting services, 25 aya Qatar said in a regulatory filing. viding them access to job opportunities. a remarkable 65 growth (year-on-year), bank provided a loan guarantee of workshops and more than 100 training The Peninsula The state-owned development organ- while the number of industrial projects QR938m in 2019. Al Dhameen is an ini- programmes dedicated to SMEs. Some isation is the main entity responsible for funded by the Bank saw 26 percent tiative related to credit guarantee to 6,600 trainees benefited from QDB’s supporting and promoting local SMEs to growth. The total number of companies promote the growth and development training and development programmes GWC announces establish a vibrant private sector in the receiving the QDB’s financial benefits of SMEs in Qatar. in 2019 with a growth of 88 percent com- establishment of country. This is part of efforts to achieve increased to 951 in 2019, recording a QDB noted that 2019 was full of pared to the previous year. economic diversification in the energy- growth of 5 percent against the previous accomplishments for the organization, QDB has also provided housing loans its subsidiary rich economy in line with Qatar National year, according to key numbers released and it is committed to providing all the to 33, 510 clients, up 3 percent, with the Vision 2030. by QDB on its Twitter handle. needful support to Qatari SMEs, and combined value of its outstanding loans DOHA: Gulf Warehousing Company After the unjust economic blockade The QDB also invested in 27 small, looking forward to providing the best reaching at QR24.3bn, witnessing 6 percent (GWC) has disclosed the estab- imposed on Qatar in early June 2017, QDB medium and emerging companies in services in the coming years aiming to growth compared to previous year. lishment of its subsidiary, GWC Investment, in Qatar. GWC Investments is 100 percent owned by Al-Khaleej Chemicals German media giant Axel Warehousing. The Peninsula Springer quits stock exchange Banks to ask for AFP — BERLIN £4bn tax cuts in post-Brexit German media giant Axel Springer announced on Friday HONG KONG: UK, European and that it would begin delisting American banks plan to ask the from the Frankfurt Stock British government for as much Exchange, following its as £4bn ($5.2bn) annually in tax takeover by American breaks post-Brexit after paying bil- investment firm KKR. lions in extra levies to the Treasury “Axel Springer SE plans to since the financial crisis, The Tel- withdraw from the stock egraph reported. exchange,” the group con- Bank chiefs, who say they have firmed in a statement. received offers from EU countries The withdrawal for their business, hope to convince announcement from Springer, Welt, still media landmarks Chancellor Sajid Javid, the British which has been listed on the despite falling sales, and has newspaper reported, citing an uni- MDax index for the last 35 pushed online with brands like dentified official familiar with the years, comes after KKR bought Politico Europe and Business request. 44.9 percent of the company’s Insider. Friede Springer, widow The banks will request a review of Boeing 777X first flight event shares to become principal of the group’s founder, and chief the bank levy and bank surcharge, shareholder in a deal con- executive Mathias Doepfner according to the report in which the Boeing workers are pictured near a 777X aeroplane during a first flight event, which had to be pictured rescheduled due to weather, at Paine Field in Everett, Washington. cluded last year. ( ) retained their stakes UK Treasury declined to comment. Springer publishes national of 42.6 and 2.8 percent, BLOOMBERG print newspapers Bild and Die respectively. Sentix global aggregate economic index Global economy likely to continue in a Goldilocks scenario for 2020 (diffusion index, -100/+100, 0 = neutral assessment ) What is the sweet spot for global be observed in the sharp changing its monetary policy Phase 1 trade agreement, economic conditions? Like rebound of the Sentix global reaction function, i.e., the respon- receding trade tensions Goldilocks in the old British tale, aggregate economic index from siveness of nominal policy rates between the US and traditional most investors prefer an a position that was negative and to changes in inflation and output. allies (Canada, Mexico, EU, economy that resembles a good deteriorating to one that is pos- Fed officials moved towards a Japan, South Korea), diminished porridge, neither too hot nor too itive and improving. The index new approach that targets risks of a hard Brexit and the cold, but “just right.” In macro tracks investor sentiment about “inflation symmetry” within the moderation of anti-business terms, this translates into an economic activity. Downturn business cycle, i.e., periods of sentiments in the US political ideal scenario of moderate fears suddenly turned into a above target inflation are agenda. Exogenous events are growth with high employment condition that is “just right.” But expected to offset periods of hence unlikely to produce a sig- and low inflation. In other can the sweet spot continue for below target inflation. Previously, nificant downturn over the words, an economy that is hot long? the Fed would only target coming quarters. enough to propel or maintain In our view, the Goldilocks forward-looking inflation expec- Third, China’s economy is earnings growth, but cool scenario is likely to continue tations, ignoring past inflation. now bottoming and the initial enough to keep monetary well into 2020. Four reasons Under the new approach, trade agreement with the US authorities from tightening underpin our position. the Fed will target higher provides more space for policy policy. This is relevant as policy inflation in order to make up for stimulus. While we expect responses to inflation pressures QNB ECONOMIC years of subdued inflation. This Beijing to continue its cautious coming from overheated econ- COMMENTARY is going to raise the bar for future approach, we recognize that the omies have often caused both interest rate hikes. Such an formalization of a deal with the recessions and bear markets. approach will likely be exported US and recent policy actions are Goldilocks is therefore a First, major central banks are from the Fed to other major pointing to stronger accommo- comfortable scenario of per- unlikely to reverse recently central banks. Therefore, tol- dative measures from economic sistent growth prospects with implemented accommodative erance for higher inflation will authorities. In the past, bouts of global financial conditions. current Goldilocks scenario for low downside risks. There is measures. Chances of a signif- increase, effectively extending Chinese monetary and fiscal Reflation forces coming from the global economy will con- little doubt that at some point icant “inflation scare” are slim Goldilocks scenarios. stimulus spilled over to advanced economies and China tinue for longer. The sweet spot in Q3 last year global recession/ due to the persistence of secular Second, global headwinds emerging markets and other are expected to prop up investor of moderate growth, high deflation fears were reversed deflationary forces, including glo- in the form of political and geo- open economies, supporting risk appetite, pushing capital to employment and low inflation by more aggressive monetary balization and the structural gap political risks are subsiding.
Recommended publications
  • Feasibility Study for the Resettlement of the British Indian Ocean Territory
    Feasibility Study for the Resettlement of the British Indian Ocean Territory Draft Report 13th November 2014 CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 4 1.1 The British Indian Ocean Territory 4 1.2 Aims and overview of this study 5 1.3 Structure of this draft report 6 2 STUDY APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY 7 2.1 Guiding principles 7 2.2 Analytical framework 8 2.3 Key phases of activity 11 3 KEY ACTIVITIES AND RESETTLEMENT OPTIONS 13 3.1 Field visit to the British Indian Ocean Territory 13 3.2 Consultations and survey results 15 3.3 Overview of resettlement options 18 4 LEGAL AND POLITICAL ANALYSIS 20 4.1 Introduction and overview 20 4.2 Constitutional and governance framework 22 4.3 Treaty arrangements between the US and the UK 31 4.4 Environmental protection laws and conventions 32 4.5 Conclusions and implications for resettlement 35 5 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 38 5.1 Introduction and overview 38 5.2 Assessment of key environmental issues 38 5.3 Evaluation of potential resettlement locations 48 5.4 Summary environmental comparison of resettlement options 55 6 INFRASTRUCTURE ANALYSIS 58 6.1 Introduction and overview 58 6.2 Assessment of key infrastructure issues 59 6.3 Summary of implications for resettlement 66 7 ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS 68 7.1 Introduction and overview 68 7.2 Data sources 68 7.3 Indicative cost estimates 68 8 COMPARISON OF RESETTLEMENT OPTIONS 74 8.1 Choice of resettlement location 74 8.2 Environmental considerations 76 8.3 Comparative costs of resettlement options 79 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS BIOT British Indian Ocean
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Report 2019
    Financial Report 2019 The Corporation of the City of London This document is available in alternate formats upon request. For more information about obtaining an alternate format, please contact [email protected] london.ca THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF LONDON Consolidated Financial Report Year ended December 31, 2019 Page Contents 2019 City of London at a Glance 5 Message from the City Treasurer 7 Financial Reporting 9 External Audit 9 Accounting and Financial Reporting Requirements 9 Consolidated Financial Statements Overview 9 Consolidated Statement of Financial Position 10 Consolidated Statement of Operations and Accumulated Surplus 10 Consolidated Statement of Net Financial Assets 11 Budgetary Process 12 Financial Management 13 Capital Financing Policies 13 Investment Policy 13 Property Taxation Policy 13 Future Tax Policy 14 Credit Rating provided by Moody’s Investors Services 15 Economic Overview 16 Employment Perspective 17 Investment Outlook 19 Local Outlook 20 Rebound for construction in 2020 23 2019 Financial Results 26 Financial Results Summary 26 Net Financial Assets 26 Total Revenues 26 Revenue Budget Variance 26 Total Expenses 27 Expense Budget Variance 27 Financing Sources for Municipal Operations 28 Property Tax Rates and Assessment Growth 28 Capital Additions and Disposals 30 Annual Surplus and Accumulated Surplus 30 Analysis of Debenture Issuance and Net Long-term Debt ($000’s) 31 Future Balances on Existing Debt and Long-term Liabilities 33 Reserves and Reserve Funds 34 Five Year Review and General Statistics
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Ireland and the EU Referendum
    House of Commons Northern Ireland Affairs Committee Northern Ireland and the EU referendum First Report of Session 2016–17 HC 48 House of Commons Northern Ireland Affairs Committee Northern Ireland and the EU referendum First Report of Session 2016–17 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 25 May 2016 HC 48 Published on 26 May 2016 by authority of the House of Commons Northern Ireland Affairs Committee The Northern Ireland Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Northern Ireland Office (but excluding individual cases and advice given by the Crown Solicitor); and other matters within the responsibilities of the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland (but excluding the expenditure, administration and policy of the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions, Northern Ireland and the drafting of legislation by the Office of the Legislative Counsel). Current membership Mr Laurence Robertson MP (Conservative, Tewkesbury) (Chair) Tom Blenkinsop MP (Labour, Middlesbrough South and East Cleveland) Oliver Colvile MP (Conservative, Plymouth, Sutton and Devonport) Mr Nigel Evans MP (Conservative, Ribble Valley) Mr Stephen Hepburn MP (Labour, Jarrow) Lady Hermon MP (Independent, North Down) Kate Hoey MP (Labour, Vauxhall) Danny Kinahan MP (Ulster Unionist Party, South Antrim) Jack Lopresti MP (Conservative, Filton and Bradley Stoke) Dr Alasdair McDonnell MP (Social Democratic and Labour Party, Belfast South) Nigel Mills MP (Conservative, Amber Valley) Ian Paisley MP (Democratic Unionist Party, North Antrim) Gavin Robinson MP (Democratic Unionist Party, Belfast East) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No.
    [Show full text]
  • Not in the Same Boat
    NOT IN THE SAME BOAT THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF BREXIT ACROSS UK FISHING FLEETS NEW ECONOMICS FOUNDATION NOT IN THE SAME BOAT THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF BREXIT ACROSS UK FISHING FLEETS CONTENTS SUMMARY 2 SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION 8 SECTION 2: THE POTENTIAL IMPLICATIONS OF BREXIT FOR UK FISHING FLEETS 10 2.1 BREXIT WILL FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT 10 2.2 THE POLITICAL REALITIES OF BREXIT 13 2.3 BREXIT IMPACT: CHANGE IN ACCESS TO WATERS (MODELLED) 17 2.4 BREXIT IMPACT: CHANGE IN QUOTA (MODELLED) 22 2.5 BREXIT IMPACT: CHANGE IN QUOTA SETTING AND OVERFISHING (MODELLED) 26 2.6 BREXIT IMPACT: CHANGE IN TARIFFS TO ACCESS THE EU MARKET (MODELLED) 29 2.7 BREXIT IMPACT: CHANGES TO NON-TARIFF BARRIERS TO TRADE (MODELLED) 30 2.8 BREXIT IMPACT: MACROECONOMIC CHANGE (NOT MODELLED) 30 2.9 BREXIT IMPACT: CHANGES IN THE FREE MOVEMENT OF EU LABOUR (NOT MODELLED) 34 2.10 BREXIT IMPACT: CHANGES IN FREEDOM OF ESTABLISHMENT (NOT MODELLED) 35 2.11 BREXIT IMPACT: REGULATORY CHANGE (NOT MODELLED) 36 2.12 SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL FACTORS AFFECTING UK FISHERIES POST BREXIT 39 SECTION 3: COMBINING BREXIT SCENARIOS 41 3.1 MAIN SCENARIOS 41 3.2 WHY AN ECONOMIC SCENARIO ANALYSIS IS NECESSARY 44 3.3 THE DIVERSITY OF THE UK FLEET REQUIRES DISAGGREGATED ANALYSIS 45 SECTION 4: RESULTS 48 4.1 RESULTS 48 4.2 SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS 55 4.3 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 60 SECTION 5: DISCUSSION 65 5.1 UNDERSTANDING THE RESULTS IN THE CONTEXT OF ENTHUSIASTIC INDUSTRY SENTIMENT FOR BREXIT 65 5.2 COULD OVERFISHING REALLY HAPPEN HERE? 69 SECTION 6: POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS 71 SECTION 7: CONCLUSIONS
    [Show full text]
  • The Brexit Scorecard Foreword
    The Brexit scorecard FOREWORD A week is a long time in British politics, as they say. But amidst the fevered speculation about the Conservative leadership election and yet another looming Brexit deadline, we risk losing sight of the bigger picture. In 2017, the UK in a Changing Europe set out a series of tests against which to judge the impact of Brexit on our country. Two years on, with the UK still a member state of the EU, we’ve decided to see what the evidence tells us about where we’ve got so far, and where we are going. In what follows, we provide an objective and impartial analysis both of the impact of Brexit to date and of what, given what we know now, the future holds. Clearly, it is too soon to come to a definitive judgement but, three years on from the referendum, it is certainly time to take stock. As ever, this report has relied on the hard work of a large number of individuals. It was written by Meredith Crowley, David Bailey, Raquel Ortega-Argilés, Thomas Sampson, Charlotte O’Brien, Iain Begg, Catherine Barnard, Holger Breinlich, Alan Renwick, Steve Peers, Phil McCann and Nigel Driffield. Any errors and omissions are, however, the responsibility of the editors. We hope they are as pleased as we are with the outcome, and that you find what follows useful in assessing the Brexit balance sheet. Anand Menon, Jonathan Portes & Matthew Bevington, co-editors Hyperlinks to cited material can be found online at www.UKandEU.ac.uk 24 June 2019 The UK in a Changing Europe promotes rigorous, high-quality and independent research into the complex and ever changing relationship between the UK and the EU.
    [Show full text]
  • Avrasya Incelemeleri Merkezi Center for Eurasian Studies
    AVRASYA İNCELEMELERİ MERKEZİ CENTER FOR EURASIAN STUDIES FRANCE TO BRITAIN: NO FISH FOR FINANCE DEAL - 07.02.2020 EurActiv (7 February 2020) The European Union must not give the UK concessions on access to EU financial markets in exchange for rights to fish in British waters, Finance Minister Bruno Le Maire said on Thursday (6 February). French fishermen temporarily lost access to waters off Guernsey, one of the Channel Islands situated near the French coast of Normandy, when a European fisheries treaty expired automatically on 31 January with Britains exit from the EU. While the fishermen are due to regain access to the area off Guernsey, future fishing rights in UK waters more generally are likely to be a flashpoint in the negotiations between Brussels and London on a post-Brexit relationship. We must clearly find an agreement on fishing, but not a grand bargain. I am totally opposed to the idea of a grand bargain where we would give ground on finance to get a deal on fishing, Le Maire told a financial conference in Paris. Im calling for great firmness towards Britain, they chose to leave the European Union. If they want to have access to European financial markets they can, of course, but on our terms, with our rules and our supervisors, La Maire added. Britain is seeking future EU financial market access based on the blocs system of equivalence, which requires a non-EU countrys rules to be similar to those in the bloc. Le Maire said the EU had to show firmness and said any future deal must ensure that British-based firms fully comply with EU rules if they want to have access.
    [Show full text]
  • Eu Divorce Bill No Deal
    Eu Divorce Bill No Deal restorativelynxBristly serialize or crystal, after while didynamous Chen Zedekiah never Waldovernalisessingularizing pave some so any stepwise? cypress centre! Heroicalparenterally. and Ismultipolar Jesse counter-revolutionary Andrzej miswriting her or We must pay less divisive figure is likely to agree in advance of measures, told mps to exist to ratify it reaches the eu divorce bill deal What length of Power likewise The UN Wield Internationally? US trade deal would like dependent upon the peace terms being upheld. Independent report in eu deal on brexit bill is among wealthy donors, moscow and competition will set a trade deal also given significant pressure from. And with Parliament back in session, it really been a tumultuous week for Johnson. Secret plans to broadcast the Brexit deadlock by most a General Election during a critical EU summit have been drawn up by advisers to Boris Johnson. Render the remaining ads DARLA. UK and the EU can be calculated. Ecj over whether eu deal. Brussels warns Johnson No trade talks until 39bn Brexit. The eu no more than europol chief for example, especially if it? Why cannot at the UN? In fact, previously he said income was skint and needed it. Journal Media in relation to such content if their ability to interpret such content, posts, comments and submissions available. Paper highlights acute community for powers over immigration policy. As military member holding, the UK made annual contributions to the EU budget. Latest washington post provides for no deal. Johnson has raised by far from such as from each country pays most comprehensive future.
    [Show full text]
  • Brexit: Where Do We Go from Here? February 2020
    BREXIT: WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE? FEBRUARY 2020 The UK general election which took place on 12 December 2019 was a pivotal moment in the long-running Brexit saga. Boris Johnson's primary objective in calling the election (or, more to the point, given the parliamentary super-majority required to call an early general election, managing to prevail on the other political parties to agree to one) was to break the parliamentary stalemate on Brexit. His rallying cry of "Get Brexit done" plainly resonated with the electorate, and the Conservative Party was returned with a resounding 80-seat majority. Before the election, Boris Johnson had been attempting to force Brexit through parliament with a wafer-thin majority, and then with a minority government once he had withdrawn the Conservative whip from those MPs who had voted in favour of delaying Brexit until 31 January 2020, rather than face a no-deal departure on 31 October 20201. Once the scale of his parliamentary majority became clear, obtaining parliamentary approval for the revised Withdrawal Agreement which Boris Johnson had negotiated with the EU in October 2019, and of passing the legislation to embed the Withdrawal Agreement into UK domestic legislation, became a foregone conclusion. Demonstrating the scale of Boris Johnson's victory, the European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Bill passed through parliament without a single amendment (the House of Lords proposed five separate amendments, but these were all rejected by the House of Commons) on its way to becoming the European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Act 20202. As part of the parliamentary stages of creating the new Act, the House of Commons voted to undertake the Committee stage and Third Reading stage of the bill in three days, a move described by the Hansard Society as "an extraordinarily reduced amount of scrutiny for a bill of the WAB's complexity and constitutional importance", and which reflects the speed and flexibly with which many parliamentary events can take place when a government commands a significant House of Commons majority.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fish, the Finances and the Last Act in the Brexit Drama
    Gerle Financial Communications: The last act in the Brexit drama (as of October 18, 2020) The fish, the finances and the last act in the Brexit drama The (for the time being) final curtain in the Brexit drama is rising these days, but it does not look like a good ending for the British financial and fund industry. Until recently, the biggest opportunity seemed to be "Fish for Finance". But that is unlikely to happen. British financial firms are sitting on dry land if they do not have their own branch in the European Union by now. Until the cancellation of British Prime Minister Boris Johnson last Friday, "Fish for Finance"1 – a possible trade between fishing rights for EU fishing boats in British waters on one hand and access for British financial products to the European Union on the other – looked quite promising. Haddock for funds or cod for derivatives, so to speak. The fact that fishing in the seas around Britain has regained such importance in the talks between UK and EU negotiators is not so much because of its economic importance. Although the UK has one of the most productive fishing grounds in Europe, and its fleet brought home the second largest catch in the EU last year (502,000 tonnes of fish worth around £851 million)2 , fisheries account for only 0.1 percent of the UK's total economic output.3 But because many fishermen from England, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales were (and still are) strong supporters of Brexit and the issue remains very important on the island, the EU skilfully used "Fish for Finance" in the negotiations.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Economics | Scotiabank’S Global Outlook
    GLOBAL ECONOMICS | SCOTIABANK’S GLOBAL OUTLOOK April 12, 2018 United Kingdom CONTACTS Alan Clarke, Head of European Fixed Income Strategy The Bank of England looks very likely to raise Bank Rate at the May 44.207.826.5986 (London) Fixed Income Strategy meeting, in line with our long-held view. [email protected] Notwithstanding a number of one-off disturbances, the fundamentals facing output are improving and we expect an upwards trend for GDP growth this year. United Kingdom 2017 2018f 2019f Inflation has begun to slow and we expect plenty more downside from here. Real GDP (annual % change) 1.8 1.7 1.9 CPI (y/y %, eop) 3.0 1.9 1.9 The Bank of England looks very likely to hike Bank Rate at the mid-May Monetary Central bank policy rate (%, eop) 0.50 1.00 1.50 Policy Committee (MPC) meeting—in line with our long-held view. Thereafter, our UK pound (GBPUSD, eop) 1.35 1.47 1.50 view is that the MPC will hike rates again in November, though we expect it to be Source: Scotiabank Economics. a bumpy ride between then and now. In terms of the May MPC, enough boxes have been ticked for an immediate rate hike. In particular, signs of accelerating wage inflation, further tightening in the labour market and solid GDP growth all support the case for the second rate hike in this cycle. We expect further Chart 1 acceleration in GDP growth and wage inflation to support the case for a hike in GBP exchange rate points to further slowdown in November.
    [Show full text]
  • Negotiating Brexit: the Views of the EU27
    Negotiating Brexit: the views of the EU27 Tim Durrant | Alex Stojanovic | Lewis Lloyd About this paper This paper looks at the interests of member states in the future relationship between the European Union (EU) and the UK. Using data on trade, migration and public opinion, as well as public statements from governments and others, the paper assesses where member states’ interests differ and where they align. The overarching considerations are followed by individual profiles of all 27 member states. Our Brexit work Following the UK’s vote to leave the EU, the Institute for Government launched a major programme of work looking at the negotiations, the UK’s future relationship with the EU and how it governs itself after Brexit. Keep up to date with our comment, explainers and reports, read our media coverage, and find out about our events at: Find out more www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/brexit March 2018 Contents List of figures 2 Summary 3 1. The approach to phase two of the Brexit negotiations 5 2. What the EU27 are thinking 8 3. Conclusions 21 Member state profiles 23 Appendix: methodology 50 References 52 List of figures Figure 1 Member state share of the vote in the European Council (without the UK) 6 Figure 2 Net trust in the EU by member state 11 Figure 3 Member state exports to the UK as a percentage of GDP 13 Figure 4 Member state goods trade balance with the UK as a percentage of GDP 14 Figure 5 Member state travel services exports to the UK as a percentage of services exports to the UK 17 2 NEGOTIATING BREXIT: THE VIEWS OF THE EU27 Summary The 27 other member states of the European Union (EU) have presented a unified front in the Brexit negotiations so far.
    [Show full text]
  • Brexit Update
    January 14, 2020 Brexit Update Three and a half years after the June 2016 referendum, the UK in all likelihood will leave the EU. While the departure date technically is January 31, 2020, in fact little will change on January 31 as the departure date will be followed by a transition period that is expected to end on December 31, 2020. During the transition period, the UK remains in the EU customs union and the single market, and remains subject to EU rules and the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice. It does not participate in any of the political institutions and there will be no British members of the European Parliament. As early as February, British and EU negotiators will undertake perhaps the most arduous of the Brexit tasks – negotiating the future relationship between the UK and the EU. While any number of policy differences may surface, the overarching theme will be alignment – will the UK be willing to sacrifice optionality to retain access to the benefits of access to EU markets for goods and services (as the EU insists) or will Boris Johnson prevail in maintaining the optionality to diverge. Recent Developments The original departure date, set under Article 5o, was March 31, 2019. That deadline was pushed back twice, first to May 22 and then to October 31, as MPs rejected the withdrawal deal that then Prime Minister Theresa May had negotiated with the EU. Theresa May’s failure to get her deal through Parliament three times led her to resign in June and, following a Tory Party leadership contest, she was replaced by Boris Johnson in July.
    [Show full text]