DOCSLIB.ORG

Not in the Same Boat

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

NOT IN THE SAME BOAT THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF BREXIT ACROSS UK FISHING FLEETS NEW ECONOMICS FOUNDATION NOT IN THE SAME BOAT THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF BREXIT ACROSS UK FISHING FLEETS CONTENTS SUMMARY 2 SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION 8 SECTION 2: THE POTENTIAL IMPLICATIONS OF BREXIT FOR UK FISHING FLEETS 10 2.1 BREXIT WILL FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT 10 2.2 THE POLITICAL REALITIES OF BREXIT 13 2.3 BREXIT IMPACT: CHANGE IN ACCESS TO WATERS (MODELLED) 17 2.4 BREXIT IMPACT: CHANGE IN QUOTA (MODELLED) 22 2.5 BREXIT IMPACT: CHANGE IN QUOTA SETTING AND OVERFISHING (MODELLED) 26 2.6 BREXIT IMPACT: CHANGE IN TARIFFS TO ACCESS THE EU MARKET (MODELLED) 29 2.7 BREXIT IMPACT: CHANGES TO NON-TARIFF BARRIERS TO TRADE (MODELLED) 30 2.8 BREXIT IMPACT: MACROECONOMIC CHANGE (NOT MODELLED) 30 2.9 BREXIT IMPACT: CHANGES IN THE FREE MOVEMENT OF EU LABOUR (NOT MODELLED) 34 2.10 BREXIT IMPACT: CHANGES IN FREEDOM OF ESTABLISHMENT (NOT MODELLED) 35 2.11 BREXIT IMPACT: REGULATORY CHANGE (NOT MODELLED) 36 2.12 SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL FACTORS AFFECTING UK FISHERIES POST BREXIT 39 SECTION 3: COMBINING BREXIT SCENARIOS 41 3.1 MAIN SCENARIOS 41 3.2 WHY AN ECONOMIC SCENARIO ANALYSIS IS NECESSARY 44 3.3 THE DIVERSITY OF THE UK FLEET REQUIRES DISAGGREGATED ANALYSIS 45 SECTION 4: RESULTS 48 4.1 RESULTS 48 4.2 SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS 55 4.3 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 60 SECTION 5: DISCUSSION 65 5.1 UNDERSTANDING THE RESULTS IN THE CONTEXT OF ENTHUSIASTIC INDUSTRY SENTIMENT FOR BREXIT 65 5.2 COULD OVERFISHING REALLY HAPPEN HERE? 69 SECTION 6: POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS 71 SECTION 7: CONCLUSIONS 77 ANNEX A: SCENARIO COMBINATIONS 79 ANNEX B: METHODOLOGY 81 B1: BREXIT IMPACTS AND FLEET COST STRUCTURE 81 B2: THE BIO-ECONOMIC MODEL OF EUROPEAN FLEETS 82 B3: MODELLING THE CHANGE IN QUOTA 82 B4: MODELLING THE CHANGE IN ACCESS 85 B5: MODELLING THE IMPACT OF EU TARIFFS 89 B6: MODELLING THE QUOTA SETTING OUTCOMES AND OVERFISHING SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS 98 B7: MODELLING SENSITIVITY TO QUOTA UPTAKE 99 B8: MODELLING SENSITIVITY TO DEPRECIATION 100 ENDNOTES 101 NEW ECONOMICS FOUNDATION NOT IN THE SAME BOAT THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF BREXIT ACROSS UK FISHING FLEETS SUMMARY Brexit is being presented as a beacon of hope for small-scale fishers. Many 1. FISHING IS A TOTEMIC coastal communities are looking to ISSUE FOR BREXIT. Brexit for a way out of their urgent ITS POLITICS MATTER. economic crisis. Are they right to look to Brexit for hope? That is what this Few issues better symbolise the report sets out to examine. politics of Britain’s exit from the EU (Brexit) than fisheries. Fishing, like the sea itself, is deeply interwoven 3 .THE REALITY IS BREXIT WILL into the perception of the UK as PROBABLY CREATE MORE LOSERS a coastal nation separated from THAN WINNERS IN FISHERIES its neighbours. Fisheries policy, it This report is the first attempt to weigh has been claimed, is a visible and the risks and opportunities of Brexit visceral area where the UK can ‘take for UK fishers, analysing six different back control’. possible scenarios for Brexit – from the hardest to the softest final deal, from 2. BIG CLAIMS ARE BEING MADE a fishing perspective. These scenarios – BUT IS BREXIT REALLY A ‘SEA (No Brexit, Hard Brexit, Soft Brexit, OF OPPORTUNITY’ FOR UK Fishing First Brexit, Fishing Last Brexit, BOATS? and No Deal Brexit) are based on how the negotiations proceed and how the Some fishing groups are excited fishing industry is prioritised within by the opportunities Brexit them. presents. The Scottish Fishermen’s Federation (SFF) refers to Brexit as The results show that it is only in the a ‘sea of opportunity’ and the lobby highly unlikely Fisheries First scenario group Fishing for Leave calls it a where Britain puts fisheries above all ‘golden opportunity’. For others, other interests in Brexit negotiations Brexit is a ‘sea of risk’, whether that there will be benefits across the due to possible tariffs on traded UK fleet. In the more likely scenarios, products, non-tariff barriers, or the Brexit – as has long been the case – threat of overfishing. The reality of will see some fishers (mainly smaller how these risks and opportunities boats) do far worse than others. And balance out is unclear and depends the rest of the fishing supply chain on what kind of Brexit is agreed. – processors, wholesalers, retailers – which are closer to trade in fish products, are even more exposed to the risks of Brexit. ILLUSTRATION OF THE MAIN UK FISHING GEARS STECF classification 2 NEW ECONOMICS FOUNDATION NOT IN THE SAME BOAT THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF BREXIT ACROSS UK FISHING FLEETS BREXIT SCENARIOS AND STUDY RESULTS Scenario Description Assumption Winners Losers No Brexit No Brexit (serves as a base The UK remains in the EU No change. No change. case). Common Fisheries Policy and single market. Hard Brexit A Hard Brexit increases The UK can claim Approximately half the There is a reduction in quota and access based territorial waters without fleet experiences an economic performance on the UK’s new Exclusive historical access rights. improvement in economic for fleets where the Economic Zone, but results The EU would respond performance (earnings, impact of tariffs in the EU continuing its with tools available. profits, wages). These outweighs gains in quota fishing pressure on stocks vessels have significant and access. This includes and applying the highest quota holdings and approximately half the tariff rates. include most large and fleet, mostly small-scale small-scale vessels using pots & traps – the largest trawls, nets, and hooks. fleet segment by number of vessels. Soft Brexit The UK cedes some of its Lower tariffs and barriers There is little change in There is little change in claimed quota shares and are worth trading-off economic performance. economic performance. access to the UK’s new against access rights and Despite the trade-off, it is With lower tariffs, most Exclusive Economic Zone in quota shares. still the vessels holding the of the economic impact is exchange for lower tariffs large quota shares that lessened. Most vessels are on UK fish exports to the improve performance. worse off but most fishers EU. better off. Fisheries The UK avoids any trade- The fishing industry is The largest gain in There are no losses in the First Brexit offs in fisheries, securing prioritised as a key UK economic performance UK fleet compared to the increases in quota and sector and ignored by the (earnings, profits, wages) status quo. exclusive access with the EU. for the UK catching sector EU responding by reducing as a whole. All UK fleet its quota share and not segments are better off. imposing import tariffs. Fisheries Left out of negotiations, Other, larger, UK sectors There are no gains in the The largest loss in Last Brexit there is no change are prioritised. UK fleet compared to the economic performance in quota or access to status quo. (earnings, profits, wages) waters and tariffs are not for all fleet segments. All negotiated down for fish UK fleet segments are products. worse off. No Deal The UK claims high Brexit negotiations Improvement in economic Reduction in economic Brexit quota shares and access turn sour and the most performance (earnings, performance for fleets to waters, but the EU adversarial outcomes profits, wages) for fleet segments with small quota responds with high tariff prevail. segments with large quota holdings. Similar to Hard and non-tariff barriers, holdings. Similar to Hard Brexit, but with larger and fails to reduce its own Brexit, but with smaller losses. quota share or fishing gains. pressure. Above all, the type of Brexit that 4 .WINNERS: BOATS THAT FISH is negotiated hugely affects the ‘QUOTA’ SPECIES prospects for UK fishing. The process Under some of the Brexit scenarios, of determining winners and losers is fishing quotas (quantity limits for far from straightforward and depends commercial species such as haddock, on what outcomes are valued and for sole, and mackerel) for the UK fleet whom: the fishing industry is not one increase substantially; fishing resources single entity but thousands of unique are likely to be divided based on the fishing vessels. 3 NEW ECONOMICS FOUNDATION NOT IN THE SAME BOAT THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF BREXIT ACROSS UK FISHING FLEETS national waters where fish reside (zonal 6. TARIFFS OUTSIDE THE SINGLE attachment) rather than the current MARKET COULD DEVASTATE SOME division based on fixed, historical FISHING BUSINESSES fishing patterns. This increase in UK Under some of the Brexit scenarios, fishing quota raises fishing revenues, there is also the application of tariffs to profits, and wages in turn for fishers UK fish exports entering the EU. Tariffs who currently hold significant fishing would impact every fleet segment, as quotas. The larger the quota holder, the the majority of UK fish is exported less likely they are to land their catches (76%) and the majority of that is into UK coastal communities or to destined for the EU (75%). For fishers employ a UK crew. holding quota, quota gains can offset the application of tariffs in terms of 5. LOSERS: BOATS THAT DON’T – overall economic performance, but MOSTLY SMALL VESSELS not for those fishers – including the Many fishing vessels have little or no majority of the small-scale fleet – who quota, however. One of the starkest do not hold quota. divides in the UK fishing industry is There is no scenario with a better that while small-scale vessels (under 10 trade deal for fisheries than the status metres) make up 77% of the UK fishing quo. Norway, which has the closest fleet, they hold only 1.5% of the quota.
Recommended publications
  • Stingray-Boats-2014-Model-Brochure

    Stingray-Boats-2014-Model-Brochure

    ABOUT STINGRAY Based in Hartsville, South Carolina, Stingray occupies 3-5 About Stingray Technology over 225,000 square feet of manufacturing facilities and Z-Plane Hull is situated on 46 acres. 6 Warranty Environment Stingray is a privately held, family-owned business, 8-19 Sport Boats representing one of the longest continual ownerships in 8-9 180RX Sport Boat the marine industry today! Stingray has been building 10-11 191RX Sport Boat 12-13 198LE/LF Sport Boat quality runabouts since 1979 based on some very basic 14-15 225LR Sport Boat 16-17 225SX Sport Boat principles: innovation, craftsmanship, and integrity. 18-19 250LR Sport Boat Because of our “independent” status, Stingray can 20-35 Sport Decks react to changing market conditions in a much shorter 20-21 194LE/LF/LX Sport Deck cycle time than the larger corporate entities. This often 22-23 198LX Sport Deck 24-25 204LR Sport Deck Outboard leads to early recognition of shifts in consumer trends or 26-27 208LR Sport Deck demographics and thus designing products to meet those 28-29 214LR Sport Deck Outboard 30-31 215LR Sport Deck needs in a more proactive way. 32-33 234LR Sport Deck Outboard 34-35 235LR Sport Deck Stingray leads the industry with many technological 36-37 Deck Boat firsts. In 1985, Stingray was the first boat company to use 36-37 212SC Deck Boat CAD-driven CNC routers to produce production parts. In 38-49 Cuddies / Cruiser 1993, Stingray introduced the first 5-axis CNC waterjet 38-39 208CR Sport Deck Cuddy 40-41 215CR Sport Deck Cuddy designed to trim fiberglass parts, followed in 1996 by a 42-43 225CR Cuddy 44-45 235CR Sport Deck Cuddy CNC flatbed waterjet for cutting flat goods.
  • Department of English and American Studies UKIP And

    Department of English and American Studies UKIP And

    Masaryk University Faculty of Arts Department of English and American Studies English Language and Literature Anders Heger UKIP and British Politics Bachelor‟s Diploma Thesis Supervisor: Stephen Paul Hardy, Ph.D. 2015 I declare that I have worked on this thesis independently, using only the primary and secondary sources listed in the bibliography. ..................................................... Author‟s signature Acknowledgement I would like to express my thanks towards the Masaryk University and the Czech Republic for providing me with free education and I would also like to thank my supervisor, Mr. Hardy, for his support and much appreciated counsel. Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 5 The History of UKIP ..................................................................................................................... 8 Allan Sked and the First Years .................................................................................................. 8 Change of Leadership and Becoming the Fourth Largest Party ............................................. 12 Becoming a Political Party ...................................................................................................... 16 The Beginning of a New Era ................................................................................................... 21 Analysing the Party‟s Policies ...................................................................................................
  • Now UKIP's Leader Paul Nuttall Has Been Called

    Now UKIP's Leader Paul Nuttall Has Been Called

    1 PAUL NUTTAL ANDREW MARR SHOW 5TH MARCH 2017 PAUL NUTTALL Andrew Marr: Now UKIP’s Leader Paul Nuttall has been called the ‘purple Pinocchio’ and he’s been derided on social media as a fantasist. One of the party’s biggest donors Arron Banks says that his leadership is weak and that the party quotes ‘thrashing around for a purpose. Paul Nuttall joins me now’ Andrew Marr: It was a very, very bruising by-election for you and you then went on holiday. Paul Nuttall: Yes. Andrew Marr: Where did you go? Paul Nuttall: Where did I go? Andrew Marr: Yes. Paul Nuttall: I disappeared somewhere in this country. I wanted to get away. I was being hounded by the press, my family were being hounded by the press as well. Frankly, you know, it was a long, difficult campaign and you know, I’m back in the saddle now, that’s the main thing, and UKIP will move forward. Andrew Marr: After all the things that were said about you during that campaign did you ever think ‘I might step down as leader. Maybe I’m the wrong guy for this job’? Paul Nuttall: I never thought I was the wrong guy. I mean, of course you do have moments of doubt. Well, look, you know, it was a highly personal campaign. My family were being hounded in a way that I think most politicians will never have to go through. 2 PAUL NUTTAL You know, when your 86 year old grandmother, who’s standing there in her dressing gown, gets a camera shoved in her face, when your father’s being followed to work, you know, when your wider family are being harassed, you know, it is difficult.
  • Frequencies Between Serial Killer Typology And

    Frequencies Between Serial Killer Typology And

    FREQUENCIES BETWEEN SERIAL KILLER TYPOLOGY AND THEORIZED ETIOLOGICAL FACTORS A dissertation presented to the faculty of ANTIOCH UNIVERSITY SANTA BARBARA in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PSYCHOLOGY in CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY By Leryn Rose-Doggett Messori March 2016 FREQUENCIES BETWEEN SERIAL KILLER TYPOLOGY AND THEORIZED ETIOLOGICAL FACTORS This dissertation, by Leryn Rose-Doggett Messori, has been approved by the committee members signed below who recommend that it be accepted by the faculty of Antioch University Santa Barbara in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PSYCHOLOGY Dissertation Committee: _______________________________ Ron Pilato, Psy.D. Chairperson _______________________________ Brett Kia-Keating, Ed.D. Second Faculty _______________________________ Maxann Shwartz, Ph.D. External Expert ii © Copyright by Leryn Rose-Doggett Messori, 2016 All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT FREQUENCIES BETWEEN SERIAL KILLER TYPOLOGY AND THEORIZED ETIOLOGICAL FACTORS LERYN ROSE-DOGGETT MESSORI Antioch University Santa Barbara Santa Barbara, CA This study examined the association between serial killer typologies and previously proposed etiological factors within serial killer case histories. Stratified sampling based on race and gender was used to identify thirty-six serial killers for this study. The percentage of serial killers within each race and gender category included in the study was taken from current serial killer demographic statistics between 1950 and 2010. Detailed data
  • Understanding Youth Gangs in Yakima County

    Understanding Youth Gangs in Yakima County

    Is My Child At Risk For Gang Involvement? Parents play a crucial role in keeping their children out of gangs. Unfortunately many parents lack important information Understanding about what to look for. Youth between 12-14 years of age are most likely to consider joining a gang; however children as young as first grade can be recruited. You should know that kids who have school difficulties, a lack of parental supervision, use alcohol or other drugs, are often Youth Gangs truant from school or very prone to “following the pack” are most at risk of gang involvement. in Yakima County Why Do Kids Join Gangs? Adolescence is a time in life when children begin to define their own identity. Many seek out new peer groups as a means Yakima County Resources of gaining acceptance. Gangs can meet this need. Gangs can provide things children may not get at home or elsewhere — not just acceptance, but structure, money, food, activities, companionship, and even love. Kids don’t run toward gangs, they are running away from something else and find gangs. You can help prevent gang involvement by ensuring all your 211 is a local resource help line that can refer you children’s needs are met in some other way. to parenting programs, counselors, mental health therapists, and substance abuse providers. Southeast Community Center/OIC/Building the Bridges gang outreach workers can be reached at 509-575-6114 Behaviors Associated With Gang Involvement Randy Town, ESD 105 Yakima County Gang Youth who are involved in gangs may exhibit changes in behavior.
  • European Parliament Elections 2014

    European Parliament Elections 2014

    European Parliament Elections 2014 Updated 12 March 2014 Overview of Candidates in the United Kingdom Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 2 2.0 CANDIDATE SELECTION PROCESS ............................................................................................. 2 3.0 EUROPEAN ELECTIONS: VOTING METHOD IN THE UK ................................................................ 3 4.0 PRELIMINARY OVERVIEW OF CANDIDATES BY UK CONSTITUENCY ............................................ 3 5.0 ANNEX: LIST OF SITTING UK MEMBERS OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ................................ 16 6.0 ABOUT US ............................................................................................................................. 17 All images used in this briefing are © Barryob / Wikimedia Commons / CC-BY-SA-3.0 / GFDL © DeHavilland EU Ltd 2014. All rights reserved. 1 | 18 European Parliament Elections 2014 1.0 Introduction This briefing is part of DeHavilland EU’s Foresight Report series on the 2014 European elections and provides a preliminary overview of the candidates standing in the UK for election to the European Parliament in 2014. In the United Kingdom, the election for the country’s 73 Members of the European Parliament will be held on Thursday 22 May 2014. The elections come at a crucial junction for UK-EU relations, and are likely to have far-reaching consequences for the UK’s relationship with the rest of Europe: a surge in support for the UK Independence Party (UKIP) could lead to a Britain that is increasingly dis-engaged from the EU policy-making process. In parallel, the current UK Government is also conducting a review of the EU’s powers and Prime Minister David Cameron has repeatedly pushed for a ‘repatriation’ of powers from the European to the national level. These long-term political developments aside, the elections will also have more direct and tangible consequences.
  • 854 Final ANNEXES 1 to 3 ANNEXES to The

    854 Final ANNEXES 1 to 3 ANNEXES to The

    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 25.12.2020 COM(2020) 854 final ANNEXES 1 to 3 ANNEXES to the Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the Brexit Adjustment Reserve EN EN ANNEX I Allocation method for the pre-financing of the Brexit Adjustment Reserve The pre-financing of the Brexit Adjustment Reserve shall be distributed between the Member States according to the following methodology: 1. Each Member State’s share from pre-financing of the Brexit Adjustment Reserve is determined as the sum of a factor linked to the fish caught in the waters that belong to the UK Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) and a factor linked to trade with the UK. 2. The factor linked to fish caught in the UK EEZ is used to allocate EUR 600 million. The factor linked to trade is used to allocate EUR 3 400 million. Both amounts are expressed in 2018 prices. 3. The factor linked to fisheries is determined on the basis of the following criterion and by applying the following steps: a) share of each Member State of the total value of the fish caught in the UK EEZ; b) these shares are increased for Member States with fisheries that have an above average dependency on the fish caughts in the UK EEZ and decreased for the ones that have a below average dependency as following: (i) for each Member State, the value of fish caught in UK EEZ as a percentage of the total value of fish caught by that Member State is expressed as an index of the EU average (index of dependency); (ii) the initial share of the value of fish caught in the UK EEZ is adjusted by multiplying it with the Member State’s index of dependency; (iii) these adjusted shares are rescaled to ensure that the sum of all Member States’ shares equals 100%.
  • Religious-Verses-And-Poems

    Religious-Verses-And-Poems

    A CLUSTER OF PRECIOUS MEMORIES A bud the Gardener gave us, A cluster of precious memories A pure and lovely child. Sprayed with a million tears He gave it to our keeping Wishing God had spared you If only for a few more years. To cherish undefiled; You left a special memory And just as it was opening And a sorrow too great to hold, To the glory of the day, To us who loved and lost you Down came the Heavenly Father Your memory will never grow old. Thanks for the years we had, And took our bud away. Thanks for the memories we shared. We only prayed that when you left us That you knew how much we cared. 1 2 AFTERGLOW A Heart of Gold I’d like the memory of me A heart of gold stopped beating to be a happy one. I’d like to leave an afterglow Working hands at rest of smiles when life is done. God broke our hearts to prove to us I’d like to leave an echo He only takes the best whispering softly down the ways, Leaves and flowers may wither Of happy times and laughing times The golden sun may set and bright and sunny days. I’d like the tears of those who grieve But the hearts that loved you dearly to dry before too long, Are the ones that won’t forget. And cherish those very special memories to which I belong. 4 3 ALL IS WELL A LIFE – WELL LIVED Death is nothing at all, I have only slipped away into the next room.
  • Feasibility Study for the Resettlement of the British Indian Ocean Territory

    Feasibility Study for the Resettlement of the British Indian Ocean Territory

    Feasibility Study for the Resettlement of the British Indian Ocean Territory Draft Report 13th November 2014 CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 4 1.1 The British Indian Ocean Territory 4 1.2 Aims and overview of this study 5 1.3 Structure of this draft report 6 2 STUDY APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY 7 2.1 Guiding principles 7 2.2 Analytical framework 8 2.3 Key phases of activity 11 3 KEY ACTIVITIES AND RESETTLEMENT OPTIONS 13 3.1 Field visit to the British Indian Ocean Territory 13 3.2 Consultations and survey results 15 3.3 Overview of resettlement options 18 4 LEGAL AND POLITICAL ANALYSIS 20 4.1 Introduction and overview 20 4.2 Constitutional and governance framework 22 4.3 Treaty arrangements between the US and the UK 31 4.4 Environmental protection laws and conventions 32 4.5 Conclusions and implications for resettlement 35 5 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 38 5.1 Introduction and overview 38 5.2 Assessment of key environmental issues 38 5.3 Evaluation of potential resettlement locations 48 5.4 Summary environmental comparison of resettlement options 55 6 INFRASTRUCTURE ANALYSIS 58 6.1 Introduction and overview 58 6.2 Assessment of key infrastructure issues 59 6.3 Summary of implications for resettlement 66 7 ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS 68 7.1 Introduction and overview 68 7.2 Data sources 68 7.3 Indicative cost estimates 68 8 COMPARISON OF RESETTLEMENT OPTIONS 74 8.1 Choice of resettlement location 74 8.2 Environmental considerations 76 8.3 Comparative costs of resettlement options 79 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS BIOT British Indian Ocean
  • “We're All in the Same Boat”: a Review of the Benefits of Dragon

    “We're All in the Same Boat”: a Review of the Benefits of Dragon

    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine Volume 2012, Article ID 167651, 6 pages doi:10.1155/2012/167651 Review Article “We’re All in the Same Boat”: A Review of the Benefits of Dragon Boat Racing for Women Living with Breast Cancer Susan R. Harris Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 212-2177 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z3 Correspondence should be addressed to Susan R. Harris, [email protected] Received 18 November 2011; Revised 5 May 2012; Accepted 6 May 2012 Academic Editor: Tieraona Low Dog Copyright © 2012 Susan R. Harris. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This narrative review summarizes findings from quantitative and qualitative research literature that has been published over the past 15 years since an initial, community-based pilot study first challenged the long-held medical belief that vigorous, upper-body exercise would lead to lymphedema in women who were at risk due to treatments for breast cancer. Dragon boat racing originated in China more than 2000 years ago and has become a popular recreational and competitive support around the world. From the advent of the world’s first breast cancer survivor dragon boat team, Abreast in a Boat launched in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1996, there are now more than 140 breast cancer survivor dragon boat teams paddling and competing in 12 different countries. The wealth of quantitative and qualitative research that has ensued since that pilot study further supports the initial hypothesis that resistance exercise, for example, dragon boat paddling, is not only safe for women recovering from conventional breast cancer therapies but also shows that dragon boating has been embraced as a complementary exercise therapy by the cancer survivors participating in this magical sport.
  • The Brexit Vote: a Divided Nation, a Divided Continent

    The Brexit Vote: a Divided Nation, a Divided Continent

    Sara Hobolt The Brexit vote: a divided nation, a divided continent Article (Accepted version) (Refereed) Original citation: Hobolt, Sara (2016) The Brexit vote: a divided nation, a divided continent. Journal of European Public Policy, 23 (9). pp. 1259-1277. ISSN 1466-4429 DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2016.1225785 © 2016 Routledge This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/67546/ Available in LSE Research Online: November 2016 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s final accepted version of the journal article. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. The Brexit Vote: A Divided Nation, a Divided Continent Sara B. Hobolt London School of Economics and Political Science, UK ABSTRACT The outcome of the British referendum on EU membership sent shockwaves through Europe. While Britain is an outlier when it comes to the strength of Euroscepticism, the anti- immigration and anti-establishment sentiments that produced the referendum outcome are gaining strength across Europe.
  • Article the Empire Strikes Back: Brexit, the Irish Peace Process, and The

    Article the Empire Strikes Back: Brexit, the Irish Peace Process, and The

    ARTICLE THE EMPIRE STRIKES BACK: BREXIT, THE IRISH PEACE PROCESS, AND THE LIMITATIONS OF LAW Kieran McEvoy, Anna Bryson, & Amanda Kramer* I. INTRODUCTION ..........................................................610 II. BREXIT, EMPIRE NOSTALGIA, AND THE PEACE PROCESS .......................................................................615 III. ANGLO-IRISH RELATIONS AND THE EUROPEAN UNION ...........................................................................624 IV. THE EU AND THE NORTHERN IRELAND PEACE PROCESS .......................................................................633 V. BREXIT, POLITICAL RELATIONSHIPS AND IDENTITY POLITICS IN NORTHERN IRELAND ....637 VI. BREXIT AND THE “MAINSTREAMING” OF IRISH REUNIFICATION .........................................................643 VII. BREXIT, POLITICAL VIOLENCE AND THE GOVERNANCE OF SECURITY ..................................646 VIII. CONCLUSION: BREXIT AND THE LIMITATIONS OF LAW ...............................................................................657 * The Authors are respectively Professor of Law and Transitional Justice, Senior Lecturer and Lecturer in Law, Queens University Belfast. We would like to acknowledge the comments and advice of a number of colleagues including Colin Harvey, Brian Gormally, Daniel Holder, Rory O’Connell, Gordon Anthony, John Morison, and Chris McCrudden. We would like to thank Alina Utrata, Kevin Hearty, Ashleigh McFeeters, and Órlaith McEvoy for their research assistance. As is detailed below, we would also like to thank the Economic