XII-35 Baltic Sea: LME #23

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

XII-35 Baltic Sea: LME #23 XII Baltic Sea 499 XII-35 Baltic Sea: LME #23 S. Heileman and J. Thulin The Baltic Sea LME is the world’s largest brackish water body, covering an area of about 390,000 km2, of which 2.21% is protected (Sea Around Us 2007). The LME catchment area is four times larger than its surface area (Jansson 2003), comprising about 1.7 million km2, nearly 93% of which belongs to the nine riparian countries: Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Russia and Sweden. The non- coastal countries in the catchment area include Belarus, the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Ukraine. The LME receives freshwater from a number of large and small rivers, while saltwater enters from the North Sea along the bottom of the narrow straits between Denmark and Sweden. This creates a salinity gradient from southwest to northeast and a water circulation characterised by the inflow of saline bottom water and an outflowing surface current of brackish water. It is estimated that a renewal of the total water mass of the Baltic Sea would take about 25-35 years. A permanent stratification layer exists between the upper layer of low salinity and a deeper layer of more saline water (Stigebrandt & Wulff 1987). Book chapters on this LME have been published by Kullenberg (1986), Jansson (2003) and UNEP (2005). I. Productivity The Baltic Sea LME is a Class I, highly productive ecosystem (>300 gCm-2yr-1). This LME is characterised by its temperate climate. Large-scale meteorological conditions cause long-term fluctuations of salinity and temperature in the deep and bottom waters. Periodic inflows of North Sea water drive changes between oxic and anoxic conditions in deeper waters (Jansson 2003). The diversity, composition and distribution of the Baltic Sea biota are influenced by its brackish-water character, the two-layered water mass and variable environmental conditions. Primary production exhibits large seasonal and interannual variability (Jansson 2003, HELCOM 2002); downward trends were found for diatoms in spring and summer, whereas dinoflagellates generally increased in the Baltic proper, but decreased in the Kattegat. The phytoplankton community is represented by only a very small fraction of the world species total and approximately 10 species of zooplankton account for most of the biomass and production. The species composition of the zooplankton reflects the salinity, with more marine species (e.g., Pseudocalanus sp.) in the southern areas and brackish species (e.g., Eurytemora affinis and Bosmina longispina maritima) in the northern areas. As a result of the declining salinity, the relative abundance of small plankton species has increased in some parts of the Baltic Sea LME (Viitasalo et al. 1995). Since the 1980s, the abundance of Pseudocalanus sp. has declined in the central Baltic, whereas the abundance in spring of Temora longicornis and Acartia spp. increased (Möllmann et al. 2000, 2003). This change is unfavourable for cod recruitment (Hinrichsen et al. 2002) and herring growth (Möllmann et al. 2003, Rönkkonen et al. 2004), whereas it favours sprat, currently the dominant fish species in the Baltic Sea. Changes have been documented in the productivity of the near coastal as well as offshore waters due to eutrophication as a consequence of increased nutrient inputs (Jansson 2003). Eutrophication is the secondary driving force of biomass change in this LME (Sherman 2003). Changes in community structure of the phytoplankton have occurred, e.g., the former dominance of diatoms, especially in the spring bloom, has 500 35. Baltic Sea switched to dinoflagellates and increased blooms of cyanobacteria (Kahru et al. 1994). Among the marine mammals in the LME are grey seal (Halichoerus grypus), ringed seal (Phoca hispida) and harbour seal (P. vitulina), and a small population of harbour porpoise (Phocaena phocaena). Oceanic fronts (after Belkin et al. 2009): Several fronts (Figure XII-35.1) exist within the Baltic Sea LME (Belkin. 2004), namely the Bothnian Bay Front (BBF), Bothnian Sea Front (BSF), North Baltic Proper Front (NBPF), South Baltic Proper Front (SBPF), Gotland Front (GF), Irbe Strait Front (ISF), and Arkona Front (AF). Most fronts are topographically controlled: BBF and BSF encircle the respective depressions, while NBPF, SBPF, and GF extend along 100-m isobath that outlines the Baltic Proper basin. The ISF is situated over the outer edge of a sill that separates the Gulf of Riga from the Baltic Proper. Some fronts are distinct year-round - BSF, NBPF and SBPF- while others emerge and persist seasonally. Figure XII-35.1. Fronts of the Baltic Sea LME. AF, Arkona Front; BBF, Bothnian Bay Front; BSF, Bothnian Sea Front; GF, Gotland Front; ISF, Irbe Strait Front; NBPF, North Baltic Proper Front; SBPF, South Baltic Proper Front; WF, Western Front (most probable location). After Belkin et al. 2009. Baltic Sea LME SST (Belkin, 2009) Linear SST trend since 1957: 0.75°C. Linear SST trend since 1982: 1.35°C. The long-term 50-year warming (Figure XII-35.2) was interrupted in 1976 by an abrupt cooling of nearly 2°C over just three years. After a partial rebound, SST dropped again, by >1°C in a year, and by 1987 reached the all-time minimum of 6.4°C, more than 2°C below the previous all-time maximum of 8.7°C in 1975. The exceptionally cold spell of 1985-87 was followed by a spectacular 2.3°C rebound in just two years. This is probably the most abrupt warming observed in any LME to date. The extremely rapid warming rate of 1.5°C/year in 1986-87 provided a test of the Baltic Sea LME resilience with regard to rapid climate warming. According to HELCOM (2007), from 1861–2000 the trend for XII Baltic Sea 501 the Baltic Sea basin has been 0.08°C/decade (cf. global SST trend of 0.038°C/decade between 1850-2005, according to the IPCC Fourth Assessment in 2007). Our analysis shows that the Baltic Sea warming accelerated over the last 50 years, with the average SST warming rate of 0.15°C/decade. The post-1987 warming was dramatic compared with previous years, with the average SST warming rate well over 1.0°C/decade. These results are confirmed by daily monitoring surface data (Mackenzie and Schiedek 2007): since 1985, summer SST increased three times faster than the global warming rate, and two to five times faster than other seasons’ SST. “The recent warming event is exceeding the ability of local species to adapt and is consequently leading to major changes in the structure, function and services of these ecosystems” (Mackenzie and Schiedek 2007, p.1335). As the Baltic Sea becomes warmer and fresher, “marine- tolerant species will be disadvantaged and their distributions will partially contract from the Baltic Sea; habitats of freshwater species will likely expand” (Mackenzie et al. 2007, p.1348). Figure XII-35.2. Baltic Sea LME annual mean SST (left) and SST anomaly (right), 1957-2006, based on Hadley climatology. After Belkin (2009). Baltic Sea LME Chlorophyll and Primary Productivity: The Baltic Sea LME is a Class I, highly productive ecosystem (>300 gCm-2yr-1). Figure XII-35.3. Baltic Sea LME trends in chlorophyll a (left) and primary productivity (right), 1998-2006, Valuesare colour coded to the right hand ordinate. Figure courtesy of J. O’Reilly and K. Hyde. Sources discussed p. 15 this volume. 502 35. Baltic Sea II. Fish and Fisheries In the Baltic Sea LME, cod (Gadus morhua), herring (Clupea harengus) and sprat (Strattus sprattus) dominate the fish community in terms of numbers and biomass. Commercially important marine species are sprat, herring, cod, various flatfish and salmon (Salmo salar). Other important target species are sea trout (Salmo trutta), pike- perch (Stizostedion lucioperca), whitefish (Coregonus lavaretus), eel (Anguilla anguilla), bream (Abramis brama), perch (Perca fluviatilis) and pike (Esox lucius). Total reported landings in this LME showed a steady increase from the 1950s to the 1970s and the early 1980s when the landings of over 900,000 tonnes were recorded (Figure Xii-35.4). A decline in the landings was recorded in the late 1980s, down to 560,000 tonnes in 1992 due to diminished landings of Atlantic cod. This was followed by record landings in 1997 with 975,000 tonnes, almost half of which was that of European sprat (Figure XII-35.4). The landings have since declined again, with 670,000 tonnes reported for 2004. The value of the reported landings peaked in the late 1960s and the early 1970s, estimated at US$960 million (in 2000 US dollars) in 1969 (Figure XII-35.5). Figure XII-35.4. Total reported landings in the Baltic Sea LME by species (Sea Around Us 2007). Figure XII-35.5. Value of reported landings in the Baltic Sea LME by commercial groups (Sea Around Us 2007). XII Baltic Sea 503 The primary production required (PPR; Pauly & Christensen 1995) to sustain the reported landings in this LME reached 25% of the observed primary production in the mid-1980s, but has declined to less than 10% in recent years (Figure XII-35.6). The countries bordering the LME account for most of the ecological footprints, roughly corresponding to the extent of their coastlines. Figure XII-35.6. Primary production required to support reported landings (i.e., ecological footprint) as fraction of the observed primary production in the Baltic Sea LME (Sea Around Us 2007). The ‘Maximum fraction’ denotes the mean of the 5 highest values. The mean trophic level of the reported landings (i.e., the MTI; Pauly & Watson 2005) shows a significant decline from the mid 1980s to 2004 (Figure XII-35.7, top), likely due to the increased sprat landings. However, as a notable decline in Atlantic cod landings is also evident (Figure XII-35.4), and together with the decline in the mean trophic level, constitutes a case of a ‘fishing down’ of the local food webs (Pauly et al.
Recommended publications
  • Currents and Waves in the Northern Gulf of Riga
    doi:10.5697/oc.54-3.421 Currents and waves OCEANOLOGIA, 54 (3), 2012. in the northern Gulf of pp. 421–447. C Copyright by Riga: measurement and Polish Academy of Sciences, * Institute of Oceanology, long-term hindcast 2012. KEYWORDS Hydrodynamic modelling Water exchange Wave hindcast Wind climate RDCP Baltic Sea Ulo¨ Suursaar⋆ Tiit Kullas Robert Aps Estonian Marine Institute, University of Tartu, M¨aealuse 14, EE–12618 Tallinn, Estonia; e-mail: [email protected] ⋆corresponding author Received 27 February 2012, revised 19 April 2012, accepted 30 April 2012. Abstract Based on measurements of waves and currents obtained for a period of 302 days with a bottom-mounted RDCP (Recording Doppler Current Profiler) at two differently exposed locations, a model for significant wave height was calibrated separately for those locations; in addition, the Gulf of Riga-V¨ainameri 2D model was validated, and the hydrodynamic conditions were studied. Using wind forcing data from the Kihnu meteorological station, a set of current, water exchange and wave hindcasts were obtained for the period 1966–2011. Current patterns in the Gulf and in the straits were wind-dependent with characteristic wind switch directions. The Matsi coast was prone to upwelling in persistent northerly wind conditions. During the * The study was supported by the Estonian target financed project 0104s08, the Estonian Science Foundation grant No 8980 and by the EstKliima project of the European Regional Fund programme No 3.2.0802.11-0043. The complete text of the paper is available at http://www.iopan.gda.pl/oceanologia/ 422 U.¨ Suursaar, T. Kullas, R.
    [Show full text]
  • Cycling the Baltic States Saaremaa Virtsu ESTONIA Three Baltic Capitals, Curonian Spit & Saaremaa Island a Kuressaare USSIA R
    GUIDED Lithuania – Latvia – Estonia Tallinn Cycling the Baltic States Saaremaa Virtsu ESTONIA Three Baltic capitals, Curonian Spit & Saaremaa Island a Kuressaare USSIA R Baltic Se Jūrmala Sigulda Rīga LATVIA Palanga Hill of Crosses Klaipėda LITHUANIA Ventė Nida Vilnius Kaunas BELARUS RUSSIA Trakai POLAND Tour distances: cycling ~310 km, by coach ~1340 km, by boat ~62 km 11 days / 10 nights TOUR INFORMATION 11 days guided group cycling tour from Vilnius to Tallinn (Code G1) Cycling grade: The Baltic coast and National Parks of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia explored on highly scenic routes, We rate this trip Easygoing. Daily biking routes mainly on low traffic roads and cycle paths range including the three capital cities – Vilnius, Riga and Tallinn – with their old towns designated by UNESCO from 25 to 60 km (15-37 miles each day). The as the World Heritage Sites; and featuring the previously-closed Curonian Spit and beautiful Estonian terrain is varied and rolling with some gradual island. Travel from Lithuania in the south, through Latvia and on to Estonia in the north, enjoy a great hills on some riding days (some steep ups and variety of towns, villages and landscapes, and get an excellent feel for the different characters of these downs in the Gauja River valley) and dead flat most of the tour. Our walking in the capital towns distinctive countries. is along cobbled streets. Arrival & departure information /Transfers Day 1: Arrive in Vilnius grey herons and cormorants, visit the to Riga. (Cycle ~40 km, bus ~100 km). Airports: Vilnius / Kaunas / Tallinn Welcome meeting at the hotel with Hill of Witches.
    [Show full text]
  • UAL-110 the Estonian Straits
    UAL-110 The Estonian Straits Exceptions to the Strait Regime ofInnocent or Transit Passage By Alexander Lott BRILL NIJHOFF LEIDEN I BOSTON UAL-110 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Lott, Alexander, author. Title: The Estonian Straits: Exceptions to the Strait Regime of Innocent or Transit Passage / by Alexander Lott. Description: Leiden; Boston : Koninklijke Brill NV, 2018. I Series: International Straits of the World; Volwne 17 I Based on author's thesis ( doctoral - Tartu Olikool, 2017) issued under title: The Estonian Straits: Exceptions to the Strait Regime of Innocent or Transit Passage. I Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2018001850 (print) I LCCN 201800201s (ebook) I ISBN 9789004365049 (e-book) I ISBN 9789004363861 (hardback: alk. paper) Subjects: LCSH: Straits-Baltic Sea, I Straits--Finland, Gulf of. I Straits--Riga, Gulf of (Latvia and Estonia), I Straits- Estonia, I Straits, I Innocent passage (Law of the sea) I Finland, Gulf of--Intemational status. I Riga, Gulf of (Latvia and Estonia)--Intemational status. Classification: LCC KZ3810 (ehook) I LCC KZ38IO .L68 2018 (print) I DOC 34I.4/48--dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2018001850 Typeface for the Latin, Greek, and Cyrillic scripts: "Brill". See and download: brill.com/brill-typeface. ISSN 0924-4867 ISBN 978-90-04-36386-l (hardback) ISBN 978-90-04-36504-9 ( e-book) Copyright 2018 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands. Koninklijke Brill NV incorporates the imprints Brill, Brill Hes & De Graaf, Brill Nijhoff, Brill Rodopi, Brill Sense and Hotei Publishing. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • CR20 Cover 0529.Cdr
    Sterr, Maack & Schultz (eds.): Development Concept for the Territory of the Baltic Green Belt - A Synthesis Report of the INTERREG IVB Project Baltic Green Belt. Coastline Reports 20 (2012), ISSN 0928-2734, ISBN 978-3-939206-05-7 S. 77 - 87 Involving Stakeholders along the Baltic Green Belt of Latvia Erik Sachtleber1 & Andra Ratkeviča2 1Institute of Geography, Kiel University 2Dabas aizsardzības pārvalde, Latvia Abstract An essential part of nature protection is involving stakeholders by communicating the need and the benefits from conserving nature. This is very often not easy to handle, the communication with important stakeholders can be disrupted and communication with these stakeholders might malfunction. In these cases a neutral mediator can influence the process and atmosphere of communication in a way that most disruptions and barriers can be overcome. The Slitere National Park is taken as an example for the processes of communication in nature protection and the impact of a neutral stakeholder in a complicated communication regime. This paper analyses the process of communication, which circumstances influenced this process, the history of the area and its stakeholders. As a result, general guidelines for strategic communication with stakeholders in nature protection are given. 1 Introduction An important part of nature conservation is to reduce the pressure of mankind on nature, for example by reducing the negative effects of stakeholders (organisations or key persons with an interest in the usage of land in a nature protection site), economic development and people’s lifestyle. This means, nature protection depends on involving stakeholders; forming alliances and agreements with those who might harm nature with their actions, although it is not their aim – for example in tourism.
    [Show full text]
  • Baltica 18-1.P65
    Baltica wwwgeolt/Baltica/balticahtm since 1961 BALTICA Volume 18 Number 1 June 2005 : 38-43 Long-term fluctuations in the volume of beach and foredune deposits along the coast of Latvia Jânis Lapinskis Lapinskis, J , 2005 Long-term fluctuations in the volume of beach and foredune deposits along the coast of Latvia Baltica, Vol 18 (1), 38-43 Vilnius ISSN 0067-3064 Abstract Assessed in the course of this study is the sediment budget of five coastal sections with a total length of 325 km, along the sea coast of Latvia These sites are important to community due to their value as a tourism and recreation areas, with possible loss of land and recreational suitability due to coastal erosion triggered by global climate change The changes in volume of the deposits forming the relief of the exposed part of the shore slope have been determined on the basis of 57 stationary levelling transects established in 1991, 1993 and 1994 Keywords Coastal evolution, coast of Latvia, storms, erosion, accretion, monitoring Jânis Lapinskis [janisl@lanet lv], University of Latvia, Faculty of Geography & Earth Sciences, Raiòa bul 19, Riga, Latvia, LV1586 Manuscript submitted 20 December 2004; accepted 12 April 2005 INTRODUCTION erosion and deposition The range of covered coastal environments with total length of 325 km includes high Similar to other coastal areas worldwide, the Latvian energy, sediment rich sections on the open coast of the coastal zone is presently subjected to notable changes, Baltic Sea and Irbe strait to relatively low energy, as presumably,
    [Show full text]
  • CR20 Cover 0529.Cdr
    COASTLINE 2012-20 REPORTS Development Concept for the Territory of the Baltic Green Belt - A Synthesis Report of the INTERREG IVB Project Baltic Green Belt Editors: H. Sterr, S. Maack & M. Schultz The Coastal Union Germany EUCC-D Die Küsten Union Deutschland Coastline Reports 20 (2012) Development Concept for the Territory of the Baltic Green Belt A Synthesis Report of the INTERREG IVB Project Baltic Green Belt Editors: H. Sterr, S. Maack & M. Schultz Department of Geography, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel Kiel, 2012 ISSN 0928-2734 ISBN 978-3-939206-05-7 This report was prepared as part of the INTERREG Project Baltic Green Belt funded by the INTERREG IVB Baltic Sea Region Programme. The publication was part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) Imprint Cover pictures: Part of the Baltic Green Belt community near old watchtower of Saka Manor, Estonia (Photo: Henri Järv) Insets (top-down): The Sea holly is a protected dune plant on the terrestrial part of the Baltic Green Belt (Photo: Jan Barkowski) Learning with and from each other at the Baltic Green Belt (Photo: Stefanie Maack) Beds of blue mussel are an important component of the marine part of the Baltic Green Belt (Photo: Wolf Wichmann) The Baltic Green Belt at the Latvian Coast (Photo: Stefanie Maack) A Baltic Green Belt workcamp (Photo: Jurate Morkvenaite-Pauluskiene) Coastline Reports is published by: EUCC – Die Küsten Union Deutschland e.V. c/o Leibniz-Institut für Ostseeforschung Warnemünde Seestr. 15, 18119 Rostock, Germany [email protected] Coastline Reports are available online under http: //www.eucc-d.de/ and http://www.eucc.net/.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Buoyant Sub-Surface Salinity Maxima in the Gulf of Riga
    Oceanologia (2017) 59, 113—128 Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect j ournal homepage: www.journals.elsevier.com/oceanologia/ ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE On the buoyant sub-surface salinity maxima in the Gulf of Riga a, a,b a Taavi Liblik *, Maris Skudra , Urmas Lips a Marine Systems Institute, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia b Latvian Institute of Aquatic Ecology, Riga, Latvia Received 1 August 2016; accepted 7 October 2016 Available online 23 October 2016 KEYWORDS Summary Thermohaline structure in the Gulf of Riga (GoR) was investigated by a multi- Salinity; platform measurement campaign in summer 2015. Stratification of the water column was mainly Thermocline; controlled by the temperature while salinity had only a minor contribution. Buoyant salinity maxima with variable strength were observed in the intermediate layer of the Gulf of Riga. The Gulf of Riga; salinity maxima were likely formed by a simultaneous upwelling—downwelling event at the two Water exchange; Intrusion opposite sides of the Irbe strait. The inflowing salty water did not reach the deeper (> 35 m) parts of the gulf and, therefore, the near-bottom layer of the gulf remained isolated throughout the summer. Thus, the lateral water exchange regime in the near bottom layer of the Gulf of Riga is more complicated than it was thought previously. We suggest that the occurrence of this type of water exchange resulting in a buoyant inflow and lack of lateral transport into the near-bottom layers might contribute to the rapid seasonal oxygen decline in the Gulf of Riga. # 2016 Institute of Oceanology of the Polish Academy of Sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • Seasonal Variability of Radiation Tide in Gulf of Riga
    https://doi.org/10.5194/os-2020-7 Preprint. Discussion started: 27 January 2020 c Author(s) 2020. CC BY 4.0 License. Seasonal variability of radiation tide in Gulf of Riga Vilnis Frishfelds1, Juris Sennikovs1, Uldis Bethers1, and Andrejs Timuhins1 1Faculty of Physics, Mathematics and Optometry, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia Correspondence: Vilnis Frishfelds ([email protected]) Abstract. Diurnal oscillations of water level in Gulf of Riga are considered. It was found that there is distinct daily pattern of diurnal oscillations in certain seasons. The role of sea breeze, gravitational tides and atmospheric pressure gradient are analysed. The interference of the first two effects provide the dominant role in diurnal oscillations. The effect of gravitational tides is described both with sole tidal forcing and also in real case with atmospheric forcing and stratification. The yearly 5 variation of the declination of the Sun and stratification leads to seasonal intensification of gravitational tides in Gulf of Riga. Correlation between gravitational tide of the Sun with its radiation caused wind effects appears to be main driver of oscillations in Gulf of Riga. Daily variation of wind is primary source of S1 tidal component with a water level maximum at 18:00 UTC in Gulf of Riga. Effect of solar radiation influences also K1 and P1 tidal components which are examined, too. 1 Introduction 10 A distinct feature in Gulf of Riga is diurnal oscillations of water level despite tidal influence is negligible in Baltic sea. These oscillations are especially expressed in a relatively calm and sunny spring days. The amplitude of oscillations can reach 10 cm of water level in May, see Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Currents and Waves in the Northern Gulf of Riga: Measurement and Long-Term Hindcast
    doi:10.5697/oc.54-3.421 Currents and waves OCEANOLOGIA, 54 (3), 2012. in the northern Gulf of pp. 421–447. C Copyright by Riga: measurement and Polish Academy of Sciences, * Institute of Oceanology, long-term hindcast 2012. KEYWORDS Hydrodynamic modelling Water exchange Wave hindcast Wind climate RDCP Baltic Sea Ulo¨ Suursaar⋆ Tiit Kullas Robert Aps Estonian Marine Institute, University of Tartu, M¨aealuse 14, EE–12618 Tallinn, Estonia; e-mail: [email protected] ⋆corresponding author Received 27 February 2012, revised 19 April 2012, accepted 30 April 2012. Abstract Based on measurements of waves and currents obtained for a period of 302 days with a bottom-mounted RDCP (Recording Doppler Current Profiler) at two differently exposed locations, a model for significant wave height was calibrated separately for those locations; in addition, the Gulf of Riga-V¨ainameri 2D model was validated, and the hydrodynamic conditions were studied. Using wind forcing data from the Kihnu meteorological station, a set of current, water exchange and wave hindcasts were obtained for the period 1966–2011. Current patterns in the Gulf and in the straits were wind-dependent with characteristic wind switch directions. The Matsi coast was prone to upwelling in persistent northerly wind conditions. During the * The study was supported by the Estonian target financed project 0104s08, the Estonian Science Foundation grant No 8980 and by the EstKliima project of the European Regional Fund programme No 3.2.0802.11-0043. The complete text of the paper is available at http://www.iopan.gda.pl/oceanologia/ 422 U.¨ Suursaar, T. Kullas, R.
    [Show full text]
  • Appeal to Mariners, Harbour Masters and Ship Owners
    Appeal to Mariners, Harbour masters and Ship Owners Report to Maritime Administration of Latvia if: - information provided in this book does not correspond with the real-life situation; - mistakes or inaccuracies have been found in this book; - there is information regarding real or suspected new dangers to navigation. Maritime Administration of Latvia contacts Trijādības Street 5, Rīga, Latvia, LV-1048 Phones: +371 67 062 101 e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] www.lja.lv www.lhd.lv ISBN 978-9984-628-72-1 Published by Maritime Administration of Latvia, 2002 The contents of this publication are protected by copyright and without special permission or agreement must not be reproduced in any way, shape or form. Maritime Administration of Latvia, 2021 Translation provided by Daina Gross, 2014. Updates: September 2021 Notices to Mariners: 2021: 103, 212, 243, 244, 245 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents .....................................................................................................................................................3 PART A .....................................................................................................................................................................5 Preface ..............................................................................................................................................................5 A.1. Sources ......................................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Putnu Vērošana Slīteres Nacionālajā Parkā Ruslans Matrozis
    Ruslans Matrozis Putnu vērošana Slīteres Nacionālajā parkā Ruslans Matrozis Putnu vērošana Slīteres Nacionālajā parkā Grāmata «Putnu vērošana Slīteres Nacionālajā parkā» veidota INTERREG Centrālā Baltijas jūras Sigulda reģiona programmas projekta «Putnu spārni (Baltic Wings) ̶ dabas tūrisms lauku ilgtspējīgai attīstībai» (Nr. CB663) ietvaros. 2020 The book «Bird Watching in Slītere National Park» has been prepared and published within the framework of the INTERREG Central Baltic Program project «Baltic Wings ̶ nature tourism for sustainable rural economic development» (No. CB663). SATURS Grāmatas nosaukums: Putnu vērošana Slīteres Nacionālajā parkā PAR AUTORU ............................................................................................................. 6 Title: Bird watching in Slītere National park BŪT BRĪVAM KĀ PUTNAM! ................................................................................... 7 Grāmatas autors (author of the book): Ruslans Matrozis PUTNOŠANA SLĪTERES NACIONĀLAJĀ PARKĀ ............................................ 8 Pirmās brīvvalsts periods (1918–1940) ................................................................. 10 Izdevējs (publisher): Dabas aizsardzības pārvalde/ Nature conversation agency of Latvia Slīteres Valsts rezervāta dibināšana XX gs. 50. gados .......................................... 15 Autortiesības: grāmatas kā vienota veseluma pavairošana atļauta tikai ar Dabas aizsardzības pārvaldes Migrējošo putnu uzskaites Kolkā 1958. gadā .......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Developing a Pilot Maritime Spatial Plan for the Western Coast of Latvia Authors: Anda Ruskule1 and Kristina Veidemane1
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281270958 Developing a Pilot MSP for the Western Coast of Latvia Technical Report · January 2012 DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.4321.4562 CITATION READS 1 60 2 authors: Anda Ruskule Kristina Veidemane University of Latvia 21 PUBLICATIONS 107 CITATIONS 17 PUBLICATIONS 226 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: BaltSeaPlan View project Latvian Council of Science Grant No. 514/2014 Formation of marginal areas in Latvia. Causes and Consequences. View project All content following this page was uploaded by Anda Ruskule on 26 August 2015. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. BaltSeaPlan Report 16 Developing a Pilot Maritime Spatial Plan for the Western Coast of Latvia Authors: Anda Ruskule1 and Kristina Veidemane1 1 Baltic Environmental Forum, Latvia Project part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) IMPRINT Authors Anda Ruskule and Kristina Veidemane Baltic Environmental Forum, Latvia Contributions to the chapters: Edgars Bojārs, BEF-Latvia (offshore wind energy and oil mining) Ilze Kalvāne, BEF-Latvia (shipping and port development) Karīna Jansone, University of Latvia (tourism) Māra Melnbārde, BEF-Latvia (environmental context) Atis Minde, “BIOR” (fishery) Solvita Strāķe, Latvian Institute of Aquatic Ecology (environmental context) Voldermārs Rains, Association of Underwater Cultural Heritage (socio-economic context) Maps: Mikus Ranka, Hydrographic Service of the Maritime Administration of Latvia Lead Partner Dr. Nico Nolte Bundesamt für Seeschifffahrt und Hydrographie (BSH) Bernhard-Nocht-Str. 78, 20359 Hamburg, Germany Tel. +49 (40) 3190-3520 Fax.+49 (40) 3190-5000 [email protected] www.bsh.de External Project Coordination Office Angela Schultz-Zehden s.Pro – sustainable projects GmbH Rheinstraße 34, 12161 Berlin, Germany Tel.
    [Show full text]