DOCSLIB.ORG

Assessing Recreation Settings, Opportunities and Access, and Scenic Character

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Assessing Recreation Settings, Opportunities and Access, and Scenic Character Assessing Recreation, Access, and Scenery on the Nantahala and Pisgah NFs 02/20/2014 Assessing Recreation Settings, Opportunities and Access, and Scenic Character 1 Assessing Recreation, Access, and Scenery on the Nantahala and Pisgah NFs 02/20/2014 Table of Contents 9.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 6 9.0.1 Nantahala and Pisgah NFs Visitation ........................................................................................... 7 9.0.2 Tourism in Western North Carolina ........................................................................................... 11 9.0.3 Outdoor Recreation in the Southern Region of the United States .............................................. 12 9.0.4 What is the Availability of Recreation Opportunities on Other Lands within in the Broader Landscape? .......................................................................................................................................... 13 9.1 Preferences and Demand for Specific Recreation Opportunities ...................................................... 18 9.1.1 What Are the Recreation Preferences and Demands for North Carolina? ................................. 19 9.1.2 What Are the Recreation Preferences and Demands for the Southern Region and United States? ............................................................................................................................................................ 20 9.2 Recreational Settings ........................................................................................................................ 21 9.2.1 What Are the Preferences of the Public and Demand for Specific Recreation Settings? .......... 21 9.2.2 What Are the Available Ranges, Acreages, and Spatial Distributions of Recreation Settings in the Nantahala and Pisgah NFs? ........................................................................................................... 22 9.2.3 What Are the Conditions Affecting the Quality of Recreation Settings? .................................. 26 9.3 Recreational Opportunities ............................................................................................................... 27 9.3.1 What Are the Available Recreational Types by Range, Capacities, and Distribution? What Are the Nature, Extent, and Condition of Trails and Other Transportation to Provide Recreational Access? ............................................................................................................................................... 27 9.3.2 What Are the Conditions Affecting the Quality of Recreation Opportunities? ......................... 45 9.3.3 What are the Opportunities to Connecting People with Nature? ............................................... 46 9.4 Recreational Scenic Character .......................................................................................................... 54 9.4.1. How Is Scenery Currently Managed and What are the Visual Quality Objectives (VQO) Across the Nantahala and Pisgah NFs? ............................................................................................... 54 9.4.2 How Many Acres of Each VQO exist on the Nantahala and Pisgah NFs? ................................ 57 9.4.3 What Are the Identified Distinctive Landscapes and How Are They Managed? ...................... 59 9.4.4 What Are the Conditions Affecting the Quality of Scenery? ..................................................... 60 9.5 Recreational Trends .......................................................................................................................... 61 9.5.1 What Are the General Trends for Recreation in the Nantahala and Pisgah NFs? ...................... 61 9.5.2 What Are the Emerging New or Unique Recreational Trends That May Affect Future Demand on the Nantahala and Pisgah NFs? ...................................................................................................... 64 9.6 Sustainable Recreation ...................................................................................................................... 64 9.6.1 How Are Recreational Opportunities, Settings, and Infrastructure Financially Sustained? ...... 64 References ............................................................................................................................................... 66 2 Assessing Recreation, Access, and Scenery on the Nantahala and Pisgah NFs 02/20/2014 Appendices .............................................................................................................................................. 70 Appendix A – Nantahala and Pisgah NFs Crown Jewels – Uniquely Special Places ......................... 70 Appendix B – ROS maps for each Ranger District ............................................................................. 71 Appendix C – List of Camps with Special Use Permits on the Nantahala and Pisgah NFs ............... 76 Appendix D – VQO maps for each Ranger District ........................................................................... 80 3 Assessing Recreation, Access, and Scenery on the Nantahala and Pisgah NFs 02/20/2014 Tables and Figures Table 9.0.1 Top Ten Most Visited National Forests in the National Forest System .................................... 6 Table 9.0.2 Overview of Visitation to the Nantahala and Pisgah NFs.......................................................... 7 Table 9.0.3 Purpose of Visit to the Nantahala and Pisgah NFs by Percentage ............................................. 8 Table 9.0.4 Distance Traveled to Visit the Nantahala and Pisgah NFs by Percentage. ................................ 8 Table 9.0.5 Visit Duration to the Nantahala and Pisgah NFs by Percentage ................................................ 9 Table 9.0.6 Gender, Race, and Ethnic Makeup of Visitors to the Nantahala and Pisgah NFs by Percentage ...................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Table 9.0.7 Ages Groups of Visitors to the Nantahala and Pisgah NFs by Percentage ................................ 9 Table 9.0.8 Activity Participation of Visitors to the Nantahala and Pisgah NFs by Percentage; Percent Noting as Main Activity; and Average Time Spent Doing the Activity ..................................................... 10 Table 9.0.9 Percent of National Forest Visits by Overall Satisfaction Rating for the Nantahala and Pisgah NFs .............................................................................................................................................................. 11 Table 9.0.10 Percent Satisfied Index Scores for Aggregate Categories for the Nantahala and Pisgah NFs11 Table 9.0.11 Travel Economic Impact Statistics for Nantahala and Pisgah NFs 18 County Area ............. 12 Table 9.0.12 Non-Forest Service National Recreation Trails within the Nantahala and Pisgah NFs 18 County Area ................................................................................................................................................ 15 Table 9.1.1 Percent of NC Residents of Age 16 or Older Participating in Selected Outdoor Recreation Activities ..................................................................................................................................................... 20 Table 9.1.2 Percentages of the Population Participating in Recreational Activities in the South and United States in 2001 .............................................................................................................................................. 21 Table 9.2.1 Recreation Opportunity Spectrum by Management Area, based on Nantahala and Pisgah Land and Resource Management Plan, Amendment 5, 1994. ............................................................................. 24 Table 9.2.2 Percentage of each ROS classification on the Nantahala and Pisgah NFs .............................. 25 Table 9.2.3 Spatial Distribution of ROS Classifications on the Nantahala and Pisgah NFs ...................... 26 Table 9.3.1 Developed Recreation Sites by Type and District for the Nantahala and Pisgah NFs ............. 28 4 Assessing Recreation, Access, and Scenery on the Nantahala and Pisgah NFs 02/20/2014 Table 9.3.2 Whitewater Put-ins and Take-outs on the Nantahala and Pisgah NFs ..................................... 31 Table 9.3.3 Waterfalls on the Nantahala and Pisgah NFs by Ranger District ............................................ 33 Table 9.3.4 Motorized Boat Launches and Boat Ramps on the Nantahala and Pisgah NFs ....................... 34 Table 9.3.5 Motorized mileage for the Nantahala and Pisgah NFs ............................................................ 35 Table 9.3.6 Non-motorized mileage by Ranger District by use type for the Nantahala and Pisgah NFs ... 36 Table 9.3.7 Nationally Designated Trails within the Nantahala and Pisgah NFs ....................................... 37 Table 9.3.8 Trail Shelters on the Nantahala and Pisgah NFs ...................................................................... 38 Table 9.3.9 Overview of Wildernesses in the Nantahala and Pisgah NFs .................................................. 40 Table 9.3.10 Overview of Wilderness Study Areas in the Nantahala and Pisgah NFs ............................... 40 Table 9.3.11 Hunting and Fishing Licenses for Western North Carolina in 2011-2012
Load more

Recommended publications
  • French Broad River Basin Restoration Priorities 2009
    French Broad River Basin Restoration Priorities 2009 French Broad River Basin Restoration Priorities 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 What is a River Basin Restoration Priority? 1 Criteria for Selecting a Targeted Local Watershed (TLW) 2 French Broad River Basin Overview 3 French Broad River Basin Restoration Goals 5 River Basin and TLW Map 7 Targeted Local Watershed Summary Table 8 Discussion of TLWs in the French Broad River Basin 10 2005 Targeted Local Watersheds Delisted in 2009 40 References 41 For More Information 42 Definitions 43 This document was updated by Andrea Leslie, western watershed planner. Cover Photo: French Broad River, Henderson County during 2004 flood after Hurricanes Frances and Ivan French Broad River Basin Restoration Priorities 2009 1 Introduction This document, prepared by the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP), presents a description of Targeted Local Watersheds within the French Broad River Basin. This is an update of a document developed in 2005, the French Broad River Basin Watershed Restoration Plan. The 2005 plan selected twenty-nine watersheds to be targeted for stream, wetland and riparian buffer restoration and protection and watershed planning efforts. This plan retains twenty-seven of these original watersheds, plus presents an additional two Targeted Local Watersheds (TLWs) for the French Broad River Basin. Two 2005 TLWs (East Fork North Toe River and French Broad River and North Toe River/Bear Creek/Grassy Creek) were gardens, Mitchell County not re-targeted in this document due to a re-evaluation of local priorities. This document draws information from the detailed document, French Broad River Basinwide Water Quality Plan—April 2005, which was written by the NC Division of Water Quality (DWQ).
    [Show full text]
  • 15A Ncac 02B .0100-.0300
    NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Division of Water Resources Administrative Code Section: 15A NCAC 02B .0100: Procedures for Assignment of Water Quality Standards 15A NCAC 02B .0200: Classifications and Water Quality Standards Applicable to Surface Waters and Wetlands of North Carolina 15A NCAC 02B .0300: Assignment of Stream Classifications Amended Effective: November 1, 2019 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA This document available at: https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/csrrb/tri_rev_17to19/15A_NCAC_02B_.0100- .0300.pdf SUBCHAPTER 02B - SURFACE WATER AND WETLAND STANDARDS SECTION .0100 - PROCEDURES FOR ASSIGNMENT OF WATER QUALITY STANDARDS 15A NCAC 02B .0101 GENERAL PROCEDURES (a) The rules contained in Sections .0100, .0200 and .0300 of this Subchapter, which pertain to the series of classifications and water quality standards, shall be known as the "Classifications and Water Quality Standards Applicable to the Surface Waters and Wetlands of North Carolina." (b) The Environmental Management Commission (hereinafter referred to as the Commission), prior to classifying and assigning standards of water quality to any waters of the State, shall proceed as follows: (1) The Commission, or its designee, shall determine waters to be studied for the purpose of classification and assignment of water quality standards on the basis of user requests, petitions, or the identification of existing or attainable water uses, as defined by Rule .0202 of this Subchapter, not presently included in the water classification. (2) In determining the best usage of waters and assigning classifications of such waters, the Commission shall consider the criteria specified in G.S. 143-214.1(d). In determining whether to revise a designated best usage for waters through a revision to the classifications, the Commission shall follow the requirements of 40 CFR 131.10 which is incorporated by reference including subsequent amendments and editions.
    [Show full text]
  • Unali'yi Lodge
    Unali’Yi Lodge 236 Table of Contents Letter for Our Lodge Chief ................................................................................................................................................. 7 Letter from the Editor ......................................................................................................................................................... 8 Local Parks and Camping ...................................................................................................................................... 9 James Island County Park ............................................................................................................................................... 10 Palmetto Island County Park ......................................................................................................................................... 12 Wannamaker County Park ............................................................................................................................................. 13 South Carolina State Parks ................................................................................................................................. 14 Aiken State Park ................................................................................................................................................................. 15 Andrew Jackson State Park ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Parks for Kids Buddy Bison’S Fact Bites!
    south carolina parks for kids Buddy Bison’s Fact Bites! • The state is also known as the “Palmetto State.” The palmetto tree appears on the 4. Devil’s Fork State Park state flag, created in 1861, Trek the Oconee Bells Nature Trail then go rent a boat to see some of the five waterfalls when South Carolina seceded in the park! Go swimming in Lake Jocassee from the Union. or go fishing. Camp overnight. 1. Congaree National Park • Bomb Island on Lake Pick up a self-guided tour brochure and hike 5. Huntington Beach State Park Murray houses about 750,000 along the Boardwalk Trail, then go on a “night walk” and see glowing mushrooms! Paddle Look for alligators and birds from the Mullet purple martin swallows each along the Cedar Creek Canoe Trail and look for Pond observation deck then walk along the summer. The flock is even www.parktrust.org turtles. marsh boardwalk. Play in the ocean or go fishing. Enjoy a picnic then end the day by the visible on Doppler radar! campfire. 2. Fort Sumter National • The name “Carolina” de- Monument 6. Hunting Island State Park rives from the Latin word for Charles honoring King Become a Junior Ranger! Participate in a ranger Visit the lagoon for good fishing or pelican program then explore the fort and learn about viewing and look for alligators near the visitor Charles I of England. American history. Go bird watching or try fishing center! Walk along the marsh boardwalk or visit and kayaking in the Charleston Harbor. the Hunting Island Lighthouse.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake James State Park General Management Plan
    Lake James State Park General Management Plan North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Division of Parks and Recreation Mountain Region February 2017 I. MISSION & PURPOSE MISSION STATEMENT: Conservation: To protect North Carolina’s natural diversity through careful selection and stewardship of state parks system lands; Recreation: To provide and promote outdoor recreation opportunities in the state parks system and throughout the state; and Education: To encourage appreciation of North Carolina’s natural and cultural heritage through diverse educational opportunities; for all citizens of and visitors to the State of North Carolina. Our purpose: The 1987 State Parks Act defines the purposes of the state parks system. It establishes that: The State of North Carolina offers unique archaeologic, geologic, biologic, scenic and recreational resources. These resources are part of the heritage of the people of this State. The heritage of a people should be preserved and managed by those people for their use and for the use of their visitors and descendants. PARK PURPOSE: Lake James was developed for hydroelectric purposes by Duke Power Company in 1923. Lake James State Park was established in 1987, becoming the first North Carolina State Park created under the provisions of the State Parks Act of 1987. It is also the first park in the history of the state to receive funds for acquisition, development, and operation upon its creation. The park serves residents and visitors of North Carolina by providing opportunities for appropriate outdoor recreational use; providing the ability and facilities for viewing and enjoying the major scenic values of the area; protecting wildlife and natural communities within its boundaries; and providing interpretive and environmental programs that allow visitors to learn about the significant resources of the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Peak to Peak—MST Segment 1
    1 | Mountains-to-Sea Trail Last Updated 11/12/2018 View from the Mountains-to-Sea Trail at Clingmans Dome Photo by Danny Bernstein Peak to Peak—MST Segment 1 Clingmans Dome to Waterrock Knob By Jim Grode The 46.8-mile-long Segment 1 of the Mountains-to-Sea Trail (MST) be- gins in Great Smoky Mountains National Park (GSMNP), straddling Ten- nessee and North Carolina. Newfound Gap Road (US 441), which travels north from Cherokee, North Carolina, to Gatlinburg, Tennessee, forms the backbone of the park and climbs to over 5,000 feet at Newfound Gap. If national parks have specialties, the Smokies is known as a hiker’s park. The scenery is diverse: mountain views, old-growth trees, waterfalls, streams, and more shades of green than a paint chart. Mile for mile, you’ll Segment 1 | 2 find hiking in the park easier than in the neighboring national forests. Even though there are no blazes on Smokies trails, they are so well marked at every intersection that you can follow them with confidence. (Still, stop at a Visitor Center and pick up a Great Smoky Mountains Trail Map for $1.00.) The Smokies may be the most visited national park in the country but only the roads and parking lots are congested. With over 800 miles of trails, even popular trails are not very busy. The trails in the Smokies are well maintained and well marked. Hikers will appreciate that they’re in a na- tional park. The Smokies, in a temperate rainforest, have a great variety of wildflowers, from the first bloodroot in March to the last asters in Octo- ber, as well as more tree species than all of Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Differences in Neighboring Old-Growth
    ABSTRACT B. CLAY JACKSON. Vegetation Differences in Neighboring Old Growth and Second Growth Rich Coves in the Joyce Kilmer Wilderness Area: A Thirty-two-year Perspective. (Under the direction of H. Lee Allen). I surveyed vegetation in neighboring old growth and second growth rich coves in the Joyce Kilmer Wilderness Area, North Carolina. This data, combined with data from three previous studies, provide a 32 year perspective of stand structure, species frequencies of occurrence at the 1 m2 scale, and species richness at the 1 m2 scale. I sampled one 0.1 ha plot in each cove. I subdivided each plot into ten 10 m by 10 m modules and sampled percentage cover of all species present in each module, plus stem diameter for woody stems. Additionally, I sampled presence absence in a variety of subplots at scales of 0.01 m2, 0.1 m2, 1 m2, 10 m2, and 100 m2. A cohort of 30-40 cm diameter at breast height Liriodendron tulipifera trees dominated the second growth cove, while the old growth site had a broader mix of species with an inverse J-shape diameter distribution. In both rich coves, the frequencies of occurrence at 1 m2 appeared highly variable for individual species between sample years and distances of 200 m or less. The four studies provided species richness comparisons at the 1 m2 scale between the old growth and second growth (at ages 16, 35, 39, and 47 years). I concluded that the differences in second growth species richness between studies demonstrated rich cove forest succession. High species richness following disturbance reflected a surge of opportunistic species (age 16).
    [Show full text]
  • Tourism Asset Inventory
    Asset Asset Management Overview Natural/Scenic Asset Details Cultural/Historic Asset Details Event Asset Details Type: Brief Description Potential Market Draw: Access: Uses: Ownership Supporting Critical Asset is Key Tourism Opportunities are Land Visitor Use Management Interpretation Ranger at Site Visitor Potential Land Protection Species Represents the Type of Cultural Representation has Promotion of event Attendance of Event Event results Event has a NGOs Management marketed through Impact Indicators provided to businesses, Management Policy or Plan Plans Included at Site Facilities at Hazards Status Protection cultural heritage of the Heritage Represented: the support of a is primarily: event is Duration: in increased specific Natural, Cultural, Day Visit, Overnight, 1 = difficult Hiking, Biking, Issues Destination are Being visitors, and community Plan in Place Stakeholder Site Status region diverse group of primarily: overnight marketing Historic, Scenic, Extended 5 = easy Paddling, Marketing Monitored on a members to donate Input Tangible, Intangible, stakeholders Locally, Regionally, One Day, stays in strategy and Event, Educational, Interpretation, Organization / Regular Basis time, money, and/or Both Nationally, Locally, Multiple Days destination economic Informational etc. TDA and Reported to other resources for Internationally, All Regionally, impact TDA asset protection Nationally, indicators Internationally, All Pisgah National Forest Natural Established in 1916 and one of the first national Day Visit, Overnight, 5; PNF in Hiking, Biking, U.S. Federal Pisgah Overcrowding Yes Yes, in multiple ways Nantahalla and y,n - name, year Yes; National At various placs at various At various Any hazard Federally protected See Forest forests in the eastern U.S., Pisgah stretches across Extended Transylvania Rock Climbing, Government Conservancy, at some popular through multiple Pisgah forest Forest listed below locations below locations below associated with public lands for Management several western North Carolina counties.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2: Struggle for the Frontier Quiz
    Chapter 2: Struggle for the Frontier Quiz 1. Which of the following tribes lived or hunted in Tennessee? (Select all that apply) a. Cherokee b. Shawnee c. Iroquois d. Creek e. Chickasaw 2. What is Cumberland Gap? a. A low area between the mountains that allowed travelers to cross the mountains more easily b. A trail cut by Richard Henderson through the mountains c. An early settlement in Tennessee d. A mountain peak between Tennessee and Kentucky 3. During the French and Indian War, the British built which Fort in an effort to keep the Cherokee loyal to their side? (Choose 1) a. Fort Nashborough b. Fort Donelson c. Fort Watauga d. Fort Loudoun 4. Choose one answer to complete this sentence: The Proclamation of 1763… a. Ended fighting between the British and the French. b. Prohibited settlements beyond the Appalachian Mountains in an effort to avoid further conflict with Native Americans. c. Was an agreement among the Cherokee about how to deal with the settlers. d. Ended the French and Indian War. Tennessee Blue Book: A History of Tennessee- Student Edition https://tnsoshistory.com 5. Why did the Watauga settlers create the Watauga Compact in 1772? a. Their settlement was under attack by the Cherokee b. Their settlement was outside the boundaries of any colony c. Their settlement was under the control of the British government d. Their settlement needed a more efficient system of government 6. Who cut the trail known as the Wilderness Road? a. James Robertson b. John Donelson c. Daniel Boone d. John Sevier 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolved by the Senate and House Of
    906 PUBLIC LAW 90-541-0CT. I, 1968 [82 STAT. Public Law 90-541 October 1, 1968 JOINT RESOLUTION [H.J. Res, 1461] Making continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1969, and for other purposes. Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatimes of tlie United Continuing ap­ propriations, States of America in Congress assernbled, That clause (c) of section 1969. 102 of the joint resolution of June 29, 1968 (Public Law 90-366), is Ante, p. 475. hereby further amended by striking out "September 30, 1968" and inserting in lieu thereof "October 12, 1968". Approved October 1, 1968. Public Law 90-542 October 2, 1968 AN ACT ------[S. 119] To proYide for a Xational Wild and Scenic Rivers System, and for other purPoses. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the Wild and Scenic United States of America in Congress assembled, That (a) this Act Rivers Act. may be cited as the "vVild and Scenic Rivers Act". (b) It is hereby declared to be the policy of the United States that certain selected rivers of the Nation which, with their immediate environments, possess outstandin~ly remarkable scenic, recreational, geologic, fish and wildlife, historic, cultural, or other similar values, shall be preserved in free-flowing condition, and that they and their immediate environments shall be protected for the benefit and enjoy­ ment of l?resent and future generations. The Congress declares that the established national policy of dam and other construction at appro­ priate sections of the rivers of the United States needs to be com­ plemented by a policy that would preserve other selected rivers or sections thereof m their free-flowing condition to protect the water quality of such rivers and to fulfill other vital national conservation purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Outdoor Recreation Plan
    SCORP 2014 South Carolina State Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan i SOUTH CAROLINA STATE COMPREHENSIVE OUTDOOR RECREATION PLAN (SCORP) 2014 Nikki R. Haley Governor of South Carolina Duane Parrish Director, South Carolina Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Phil Gaines Director, State Park Service State Liaison Officer South Carolina Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism 1205 Pendleton Street Columbia, South Carolina 29201 803-734-1658 www.discoversouthcarolina.com www.scprt.com The preparation of this report was financed by the South Carolina Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Special thanks go to the following: Charleston County Park and Recreation Commission James Island County Park, the Lexington County Recreation and Aging Commission Cayce Tennis and Fitness Center, and Greenville County Recreation for the use of meeting facilities for the regional public hearings. Numerous public hearing participants and representatives of the more than 50 agencies and organizations that actively participated in the SCORP planning process, provided current information and data, submitted recommendations and contributed valuable comments and insight for the draft document. The Institute for Public Service and Policy Research, University of South Carolina, for their work on the 2014 South Carolina Outdoor Recreation Plan. Amy Blinson, Alternate State Liaison Officer, S.C. Department of Parks, Recreation, and Tourism, for her work on the 2014 South Carolina Outdoor Recreation Plan. Perry Baker, Interactive Manager/DiscoverSouthCarolina.com, for valuable assistance with the photos provided for the 2014 South Carolina Outdoor Recreation Plan. The main cover photo of this publication is Hunting Island State Park and the back cover is Table Rock State Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Milebymile.Com Personal Road Trip Guide North Carolina Byway Highway # "Waterfall Byway"
    MileByMile.com Personal Road Trip Guide North Carolina Byway Highway # "Waterfall Byway" Miles ITEM SUMMARY 0.0 Start of Waterfall Byway Byway starts at the juction of United States Highway #64 with State Highway #215 at Rosman, North Carolina. This byway passes through lands full of scenic wonder and historical significance. Bridal Veil Falls has a spectacular 120-foot cascade into the Cullasaja River. Nearby Dry Falls derives its name from the fact that visitors can walk behind the falls without getting wet. Byway towns such as Gneiss and Murphy are important landmarks about North Carolina's Native American history. 1.1 Old Toxaway Road / State Old Toxaway Road / State Route #1139, Frozen Lake, Fouth Falls, Route #1139 Upper Whitewwater Falls, Lake Jocassee, The Wilds Christian Association, a Protestant Christian organization, located here in North Carolina 2.6 Silverstein Road Silverstain Road / State Route #1309, Quebec, North Carolina, 3.7 Flat Creek Valley Road Flat Creek Valley Road / State Route #1147, 3.8 Oak Grove Church Road 5.3 Flat Creek Valley Road Flat Creek Valley Road / State Route #1147, Toxaway River, 5.4 Indian Creek Trail Road Indian Creek Trail Road, Falls Country Club, 6.8 Lake Toxaway, North Junction State Highway #281, Lake Toxaway, a community in Carolina Transylvania County, North Carolina, Tanasee Creek Reservoir, Wolf Mountain, North Carolina, Wolf Creek Reservoir, 7.3 Toxaway Fall Drive Toxaway Fall Drive, Lake Toxaway Spillway, Toxaway Lake, the largest man-made , privately held Lake in North Carolina. This is fed by natureal streams and flows out to make Toxaway Falls and on to Toxaway River.
    [Show full text]