The Bright Lights Grow Fainter

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Bright Lights Grow Fainter The Bright Lights Grow Fainter Livelihoods, Migration and a Small Town in Zimbabwe Agnes Andersson Abstract The Aids pandemic and structural adjustment policies (SAP) have had effects on lower income households in Zimbabwe which have been devastating and people have been required to adapt their livelihood strategies. Small towns meanwhile are growing rapidly in Zimbabwe and mobility towards these towns may be connected with the changes being forged by SAP on the economic landscape. This study seeks to establish how the individual migrant uses mobility to negotiate this landscape. This involves mobility directed towards small towns to access advantageous provisioning possibilities, and also the engagement in a multitude of family linkages from the small town to other places within the settlement system. Substantiated through a case study of Rusape, this study suggests that lower living costs, higher food security and a more accessible labour market may be attracting migrants from higher level urban centres. The role of the network of kin relations in mobility is important and migrants’ networks over space cover both rural homes and urban areas. The access to networks, however, is being stratified under SAP and the ability to maintain linkages with relatives is declining, suggesting a rising vulnerability connected with the inability of leaving places and entering others. Key Words: Zimbabwe, livelihood, migration, mobility, provisioning, structural adjustment, Rusape, small towns, kin networks Copyright Agnes Andersson and the Department of Human Geography, 2002. All rights reserved. Department of Human Geography, Stockholm University ISBN 91-22-01967-7 Printed by Akademitryck AB, Edsbruk, Sweden, 2002. The Bright Lights Grow Fainter Livelihoods, Migration and a Small Town in Zimbabwe Academic dissertation for the exam of Doctor of Philosophy at Stockholm University to be publicly defended at the Department of Human Geography in the De Geer Hall, the Geo-Science Building, Frescati, Stockholm on Friday, 7 June 2002 at 13:00 hours by Agnes Andersson Department of Human Geography Stockholm 2002 Stockholm University ISBN 91-22-01967-7 S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden ISSN 0343-7003 Abstract The Aids pandemic and structural adjustment policies (SAP) have had effects on lower income households in Zimbabwe which have been devastating and people have been required to adapt their livelihood strategies. Small towns meanwhile are growing rapidly in Zimbabwe and mobility towards these towns may be connected with the changes being forged by SAP on the economic landscape. This study seeks to establish how the individual migrant uses mobility to negotiate this landscape. This involves mobility directed towards small towns to access advantageous provisioning possibilities, and also the engagement in a multitude of family linkages from the small town to other places within the settlement system. Substantiated through a case study of Rusape, this study suggests that lower living costs, higher food security and a more accessible labour market may be attracting migrants from higher level urban centres. The role of the network of kin relations in mobility is important and migrants’ networks over space cover both rural homes and urban areas. The access to networks, however, is being stratified under SAP and the ability to maintain linkages with relatives is declining, suggesting a rising vulnerability connected with the inability of leaving places and entering others. Key Words: Zimbabwe, livelihood, migration, mobility, provisioning, structural adjustment, Rusape, small towns, kin networks Contents Contents __________________________________________________ 1 List of figures ______________________________________________ 4 List of tables_______________________________________________ 4 List of maps _______________________________________________ 5 List of photographs _________________________________________ 5 List of abbreviations_________________________________________ 5 A note on currency and prices _________________________________ 6 Acknowledgements _____________________________________________ 7 1 Introduction and conceptual framework _________________________ 9 1.1 Introduction___________________________________________ 9 1.2 Conceptual framework _________________________________ 11 Livelihood strategies and migration theory _________________ 12 Small town theory_____________________________________ 16 Synthesising actor, structure and the small town _____________ 18 1.3 Methodology and structure of the study____________________ 21 2 Livelihoods, urbanisation and mobility in Southern Rhodesia and Zimbabwe____________________________________________________ 24 2.1 Introduction__________________________________________ 24 2.2 Livelihoods and mobility in Southern Rhodesia _____________ 24 2.3 Structural change, livelihoods and mobility in Zimbabwe______ 28 Structural adjustment __________________________________ 28 Rural pressures _______________________________________ 30 Urban pressures ______________________________________ 33 HIV/Aids____________________________________________ 34 Livelihoods, household structure and migration _____________ 34 2.4 Conclusion __________________________________________ 35 3 Field methods_____________________________________________ 37 3.1 The case study approach________________________________ 37 3.2 The choice of case location______________________________ 38 3.3 Survey method _______________________________________ 38 3.4 Interview approach ____________________________________ 40 4 Rusape, the setting of the study _______________________________ 43 4.1 Introduction__________________________________________ 43 4.2 Makoni District_______________________________________ 44 4.3 A historical profile of Rusape____________________________ 48 1 4.4 Town profile and position within the settlement hierarchy _____ 49 4.5 A social profile of Rusape_______________________________ 55 4.6 Vengere high density area_______________________________ 57 4.7 Conclusion___________________________________________ 61 5 Migration patterns to Rusape _________________________________ 62 5.1 Population growth _____________________________________ 62 5.2 Sample data __________________________________________ 65 5.3 Previous urban experience of migrants_____________________ 67 5.4 Regional aspects of migration____________________________ 69 5.5 Purpose of migration and perceived benefits of migration to Rusape 71 5.6 Conclusion___________________________________________ 74 6 Urban costs of housing and transportation _______________________ 75 6.1 Introduction__________________________________________ 75 6.2 Housing and migration _________________________________ 76 6.3 The context of housing in Zimbabwe ______________________ 78 6.4 Housing and migration to Rusape_________________________ 82 Migration for home ownership purposes ___________________ 83 Rental accommodation and migration _____________________ 86 6.5 Housing in other urban areas ____________________________ 89 Housing policies and waiting lists ________________________ 89 Availability and price of urban land _______________________ 91 The private property market _____________________________ 92 The market for rental accommodation _____________________ 93 6.6 Local transportation costs _______________________________ 95 Zimbabwean transportation policy ________________________ 96 6.7 Conclusion__________________________________________ 101 7 Food security in Rusape ____________________________________ 103 7.1 Introduction_________________________________________ 103 7.2 Urban agriculture ____________________________________ 106 7.3 Urban agriculture in Zimbabwe _________________________ 107 7.4 Access to rural land and food ___________________________ 112 7.5 Actual food prices ____________________________________ 119 7.6 Conclusion__________________________________________ 121 8 Employment opportunities in, and migration to Rusape ___________ 123 8.1 Introduction_________________________________________ 123 8.2 Employment and migration to Rusape ____________________ 124 Formal employment __________________________________ 126 Informal employment _________________________________ 131 Self-employment within the informal sector _______________ 132 2 8.3 Conclusion _________________________________________ 137 9 Negotiating the settlement hierarchy __________________________ 139 9.1 Introduction_________________________________________ 139 9.2 Migration and household livelihood systems _______________ 140 Aids_______________________________________________ 141 Structural adjustment, informalization of labour markets and the household __________________________________________ 143 The individual, the household and migration _______________ 145 The household as a support system ______________________ 147 9.3 Negotiating the settlement hierarchy _____________________ 152 Rural linkages and urban livelihoods _____________________ 152 The maintenance of rural linkages _______________________ 155 Balancing the rural and the urban________________________ 161 Rural linkages as exit options___________________________ 162 Urban income diversification, emigration and urban-urban links 168 Perceived length of future residence in Rusape _____________ 172 9.4 Conclusion _________________________________________ 176 10 Summary and Conclusions__________________________________ 177 10.1 Conceptual framework and methodology__________________ 177 10.2 Results_____________________________________________
Recommended publications
  • Mopane Woodlands and the Mopane Worm: Enhancing Rural Livelihoods and Resource Sustainability
    Mopane Woodlands and the Mopane Worm: Enhancing rural livelihoods and resource sustainability Final Technical Report Edited by Jaboury Ghazoul1, Division of Biology, Imperial College London Authors and contributors Mopane Tree Management: Dirk Wessels2, Member Mushongohande3, Martin Potgeiter7 Domestication Strategies: Alan Gardiner4, Jaboury Ghazoul Kgetsie ya Tsie Case Study: John Pearce5 Livelihoods and Marketing: Jayne Stack6, Peter Frost7, Witness Kozanayi3, Tendai Gondo3, Nyarai Kurebgaseka8, Andrew Dorward9, Nigel Poole5 New Technologies: Frank Taylor10, Alan Gardiner Choice experiments: Robert Hope11, Witness Kozanayi, Tendai Gondo Mopane worm diseases: Robert Knell12 Start and End Date 1 May 2001 – 31 January 2006 DFID Project Reference Number R 7822 Research Programme Forestry Research Programme (FRP) Research Production System Forest Agriculture Interface 1 Also ETH Zürich, Department of Environmental Sciences, ETH Zentrum CHN, Universitätstrasse 16, Zürich 8092, Switzerland 2 Department of Botany, university fo the North, South Africa 3 Forest Commission, Harare, Zimbabwe 4 Veld Products Research and Development, Gabarone, and Division of Biology, Imperial College London 5 Kgetsie ya Tsie, Tswapong Hills, Botswana 6 Imperial College London and University of Zimbabwe, Project Co-ordinator 7 Institute of Environmental Studies 8 Southern Alliance for Indigenous Resources 9 Imperial College London, Centre for Environmental Policy. 10 Veld Products Research and Development 11 University of Newcastle 12 Queen Mary College, University of London 1 Contents Executive Summary 3 Background 3 Project Purpose 6 Research Activities Section 1. Mopane tree ecology and management 7 Section 2.1 Mopane worm productivity and domestication 18 Section 2.2 Mini-livestock: Rural Mopane Worm Farming at the Household Level 34 Section 3. A case study of the Kgetsie ya Tsie community enterprise model for managing and trading mopane worms 59 Section 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Zimbabwean Government Gazette
    A I SET ZIMBABWEAN GOVERNMENT GAZETTE Published by Authority Vol. LXXI, No. 44 2nd JULY. 1993 Price $2,50 i General Notice 384 of 1993. Zimbabwe United Passenger Company. ^^0/226/93. Permit: 15723. Motor-omnibus. Passenger-capacity: ROAD MOTOR TRANSPORTATION ACT [CHAPTER 262] Route 1: As d^ned in the agreonent between the holder and Applications in Connexion with Road Service Permits the Harare Municipality, approved by the Minister in terms of section 18 of the Road Motor Transportation Act [Chapter 262]. IN terms of subsection (4) of section 7 of the Road Motor Transportation Act [Chapter 262], notice is hereby given that Route 2:' Throu^out Zimbabwe. the applications detailed in the Sdiedule, for ue issue or Route 3: Harare - Darwendale - Banket - Chinhoyi - Aladta amendment of road service permits, have been received for the Compoimd - Sheckleton Mine - lions Den. consideration of the Controller of Road Motor Transportation. Condition: Any person wishing to object to any such application must Route 2: lodge with the Controller of Road Motor Transportation, (a) For private hire and for advertised or organized P.O. Box 8332, Causeway— tours, provided no stage carriage service is operated (a) a notice, in writing, of his intention to object, so as along any route. to reach the Controller’s ofiSce not later than the 23rd (b) No private Hire or any advertised or organized tour July, 1993; shall be operated under authority of this permit, (b) his objection and the grounds therefor, on form RAl.T. during ^e times for which a scheduled stage carriage 24, together with two copies tiiereof, so as to tetaxHa.
    [Show full text]
  • Malaria Outbreak Investigation in a Rural Area South of Zimbabwe: a Case–Control Study Paddington T
    Mundagowa and Chimberengwa Malar J (2020) 19:197 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-03270-0 Malaria Journal RESEARCH Open Access Malaria outbreak investigation in a rural area south of Zimbabwe: a case–control study Paddington T. Mundagowa1* and Pugie T. Chimberengwa2 Abstract Background: Ninety percent of the global annual malaria mortality cases emanate from the African region. About 80–90% of malaria transmissions in sub-Saharan Africa occur indoors during the night. In Zimbabwe, 79% of the population are at risk of contracting the disease. Although the country has made signifcant progress towards malaria elimination, isolated seasonal outbreaks persistently resurface. In 2017, Beitbridge District was experiencing a second malaria outbreak within 12 months prompting the need for investigating the outbreak. Methods: An unmatched 1:1 case–control study was conducted to establish the risk factors associated with con- tracting malaria in Ward 6 of Beitbridge District from week 36 to week 44 of 2017. The sample size constituted of 75 randomly selected cases and 75 purposively selected controls. Data were collected using an interviewer-administered questionnaire and Epi Info version 7.2.1.0 was used to conduct descriptive, bivariate and multivariate analyses of the factors associated with contracting malaria. Results: Fifty-two percent of the cases were females and the mean age of cases was 29 13 years. Cases were diag- nosed using rapid diagnostic tests. Sleeping in a house with open eaves (OR: 2.97; 95% CI± 1.44–6.16; p < 0.01), spend- ing the evenings outdoors (OR: 2.24; 95% CI 1.04–4.85; p 0.037) and sleeping in a poorly constructed house (OR: 4.33; 95% CI 1.97–9.51; p < 0.01) were signifcantly associated= with contracting malaria while closing eaves was protec- tive (OR: 0.45; 95% CI 0.20–1.02; p 0.055).
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Women's Participation in the Construction Industry: an Analysis
    Journal of International Women's Studies Volume 9 | Issue 3 Article 14 May-2008 Urban Women’s Participation in the Construction Industry: An Analysis of Experiences from Zimbabwe Edward Mutandwa Noah Sigauke Charles P. Muganiwa Follow this and additional works at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws Part of the Women's Studies Commons Recommended Citation Mutandwa, Edward; Sigauke, Noah; and Muganiwa, Charles P. (2008). Urban Women’s Participation in the Construction Industry: An Analysis of Experiences from Zimbabwe. Journal of International Women's Studies, 9(3), 256-268. Available at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol9/iss3/14 This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. This journal and its contents may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. ©2008 Journal of International Women’s Studies. Urban Women’s Participation in the Construction Industry: An Analysis of Experiences from Zimbabwe By Edward Mutandwa1, Noah Sigauke2 and Charles P. Muganiwa3 Abstract This paper analyzed the impact of urban women’s participation in the construction business on income generation, gender roles and responsibilities, family and societal perceptions in Zimbabwe. Problems and constraints affecting women’s participation in the sector were also identified. A total of 130 respondents were purposively selected from four urban cities namely Chitungwiza, Marondera, Norton and Rusape. Structured questionnaires and focus group discussions were used as the main data collection instruments.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Paper Series
    POLITICAL ECONOMY RESEARCH INSTITUTE University of Massachusetts Amherst Community Rights, Costs, and Benefits: The Question of Natural Resource Stewardship and Community Benefits in Zimbabwe’s CAMPFIRE Program James C. Murombedzi January 2003 CONFERENCE PAPER SERIES No. 16 Committees, Rights, Costs and Benefits: The Question of Natural Resource Stewardship and Community Benefits in Zimbabwe’s CAMPFIRE Program James C. Murombedzi The Ford Foundation Johannesburg, South Africa 1 In the CAMPFIRE formulation, the resource management problems obtaining in the communal areas of Zimbabwe are the result of the absence of both the institutional capacity as well as the incentives to manage the resources in question. The CAMPFIRE solution, therefore, was to introduce new systems of group ownership and territorial rights to natural resources to communities, and provide the appropriate institutions for legitimate resource management for the benefit of these communities (Martin 1986). The implementation of this solution was attained through the enactment of an amendment to the Parks and Wild Life Act of 1975, which enables the government to delegate appropriate authority over the wildlife to the ‘communal representatives’. The CAMPFIRE program in fact constitutes a transfer of the notion of ownership, successfully implemented with regard to individual landowners, to communal landowners (Farquharson 1993). This chapter tests the extent to which CAMPFIRE has in fact been able to devolve ownership over wildlife to communities in the communal areas, and thereby promoted stewardship of wildlife through the production of benefits for the participating communities. To achieve this, I will proceed by first evaluating the extent to which CAMPFIRE has succeeded in eliciting stewardship of the wildlife resource by participating communities through the devolution of clear and unambiguous rights to wildlife to these communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Multiple Jatropha Discourses in Zimbabwe
    Understanding Multiple Jatropha Discourses in Zimbabwe: A Case of the National Oil Company of Zimbabwe (NOCZIM) Jatropha Outgrower Scheme and Nyahondo Small-scale Commercial Farmers, Mutoko A Research Paper presented by: Confidence Tendai Zibo Zimbabwe in partial fulfillment of the requirements for obtaining the degree of MASTERS OF ARTS IN DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Specialization: Environment and Sustainable Development ESD Members of the Examining Committee: Ingrid Nelson Carol Hunsberger The Hague, The Netherlands December 2012 Acknowledgements I wish to extend my most sincere gratitude to my supervisor and second reader, Ingrid and Carol. Thank you for all the support and mentorship during the duration of my studies, most of all during the finalisation of this paper. Thank you, I am truly grateful. My ESD Convenor, Dr. M. Arsel, your leadership during the Master Pro- gramme is much appreciated. Thank you. To all the WWF Zimbabwe, Environment Africa, Ministry of Energy staff- Ministry of Energy staff in Zimbabwe who assisted with the collection of data during my field research, thank you. Your assistance was valuable. To the ESD 2011-2012 Batch, and my ISS Family, Brenda Habasonda, Lynn Muwi, Josephine Kaserera, Helen Venganai and Yvonne Juwaki, we did it it!!! My family from home, Alice and Erchins Zhou, Pardon, Jellister, Jennifer, Daniel, Hazel, Primrose, God bless you!! Last, but not least, I wish to extend my most sincere gratitude to the Dutch Government for funding my studies through the Dutch Higher Education Programme, Nuffic. Thank you for this great opportunity. Above all I thank God for His guidance. ii Contents Acknowledgements ii List of Tables v List of Figures v List of Acronyms vi Abstract vii Chapter 1 : Introduction 1 1.1 An Anecdote 1 1.2 Biofuels Vs Agrofuels 1 1.2.1 The Agrofuels Debate 2 1.3 History and Uses of Jatropha 3 1.3.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Nyasa Clandestine Migration Through Southern Rhodesia Into the Union of South Africa: 1920S – 1950S
    Settling in Motion: Nyasa Clandestine Migration through Southern Rhodesia into the Union of South Africa: 1920s – 1950s Anusa Daimon Centre for Africa Studies University of the Free State Bloemfontein, South Africa Abstract Illegal African migration into South Africa is not uniquely a post-apartheid phenomenon. It has its antecedents in the colonial/apartheid period. The South Africa colonial economy relied heavily on cheap African labour from both within and outside the Union. Most foreign migrant labourers came from the then Nyasaland (Malawi) and Portuguese East Africa (Mozambique) through official channels of the Witwatersrand Native Labour Association (WNLA). WNLA was active throughout the Southern Africa and competed for the same labour resource with other regional supranational ‘native’ labour recruitment agencies, providing various incentives to lure and transport potential employees to its bustling South African gold and diamond mining industry. However, not all migrant labourers found their way through formal WNLA channels. Using archival material from repositories in Harare (Zimbabwe), Zomba (Malawi), Grahamstown (South Africa), London and Oxford (UK), the article casts light on illicit migration mainly by Malawian labourers (Nyasas) through Southern Rhodesia into South Africa between the 1920s and 1950s. It argues that many transient Nyasas subverted the inhibitive WNLA contractual obligations by clandestinely migrating independently into the Union. They also exploited the labour recruitment infrastructure used by the state and labour bureaus to swiftly move across Southern Rhodesia. In essence, Nyasas settled in motion, using Southern Rhodesia as a stepping-stone or springboard en-route to the more lucrative Union of South Africa. An appreciation of such informal migration opens up space for creating a more comprehensive historiography of labour migration in Southern Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • "Our Hands Are Tied" Erosion of the Rule of Law in Zimbabwe – Nov
    “Our Hands Are Tied” Erosion of the Rule of Law in Zimbabwe Copyright © 2008 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-404-4 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th floor New York, NY 10118-3299 USA Tel: +1 212 290 4700, Fax: +1 212 736 1300 [email protected] Poststraße 4-5 10178 Berlin, Germany Tel: +49 30 2593 06-10, Fax: +49 30 2593 0629 [email protected] Avenue des Gaulois, 7 1040 Brussels, Belgium Tel: + 32 (2) 732 2009, Fax: + 32 (2) 732 0471 [email protected] 64-66 Rue de Lausanne 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 738 0481, Fax: +41 22 738 1791 [email protected] 2-12 Pentonville Road, 2nd Floor London N1 9HF, UK Tel: +44 20 7713 1995, Fax: +44 20 7713 1800 [email protected] 27 Rue de Lisbonne 75008 Paris, France Tel: +33 (1)43 59 55 35, Fax: +33 (1) 43 59 55 22 [email protected] 1630 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 500 Washington, DC 20009 USA Tel: +1 202 612 4321, Fax: +1 202 612 4333 [email protected] Web Site Address: http://www.hrw.org November 2008 1-56432-404-4 “Our Hands Are Tied” Erosion of the Rule of Law in Zimbabwe I. Summary ............................................................................................................... 1 II. Recommendations ............................................................................................... 5 To the Future Government of Zimbabwe .............................................................. 5 To the Chief Justice ............................................................................................ 6 To the Office of the Attorney General .................................................................. 6 To the Commissioner General of the Zimbabwe Republic Police .......................... 6 To the Southern African Development Community and the African Union ...........
    [Show full text]
  • LAN Installation Sites Coordinates
    ANNEX VIII LAN Installation sites coordinates Item Geographical/Location Service Delivery Tic Points (List k if HEALTH CENTRE Site # PROVINCE DISTRICT Dept/umits DHI (EPMS SITE) LAN S 2 services Sit COORDINATES required e LOT 1: List of 83 Sites BUDIRIRO 1 HARARE HARARE POLYCLINIC [30.9354,-17.8912] ALL X BEATRICE 2 HARARE HARARE RD.INFECTIO [31.0282,-17.8601] ALL X WILKINS 3 HARARE HARARE INFECTIOUS H ALL X GLEN VIEW 4 HARARE HARARE POLYCLINIC [30.9508,-17.908] ALL X 5 HARARE HARARE HATCLIFFE P.C.C. [31.1075,-17.6974] ALL X KAMBUZUMA 6 HARARE HARARE POLYCLINIC [30.9683,-17.8581] ALL X KUWADZANA 7 HARARE HARARE POLYCLINIC [30.9285,-17.8323] ALL X 8 HARARE HARARE MABVUKU P.C.C. [31.1841,-17.8389] ALL X RUTSANANA 9 HARARE HARARE CLINIC [30.9861,-17.9065] ALL X 10 HARARE HARARE HATFIELD PCC [31.0864,-17.8787] ALL X Address UNDP Office in Zimbabwe Block 10, Arundel Office Park, Norfolk Road, Mt Pleasant, PO Box 4775, Harare, Zimbabwe Tel: (263 4) 338836-44 Fax:(263 4) 338292 Email: [email protected] NEWLANDS 11 HARARE HARARE CLINIC ALL X SEKE SOUTH 12 HARARE CHITUNGWIZA CLINIC [31.0763,-18.0314] ALL X SEKE NORTH 13 HARARE CHITUNGWIZA CLINIC [31.0943,-18.0152] ALL X 14 HARARE CHITUNGWIZA ST.MARYS CLINIC [31.0427,-17.9947] ALL X 15 HARARE CHITUNGWIZA ZENGEZA CLINIC [31.0582,-18.0066] ALL X CHITUNGWIZA CENTRAL 16 HARARE CHITUNGWIZA HOSPITAL [31.0628,-18.0176] ALL X HARARE CENTRAL 17 HARARE HARARE HOSPITAL [31.0128,-17.8609] ALL X PARIRENYATWA CENTRAL 18 HARARE HARARE HOSPITAL [30.0433,-17.8122] ALL X MURAMBINDA [31.65555953980,- 19 MANICALAND
    [Show full text]
  • Determinants of Exclusive Breastfeeding Among Mothers of Infants Aged 6 to 12 Months in Gwanda District, Zimbabwe Paddington T
    Mundagowa et al. International Breastfeeding Journal (2019) 14:30 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-019-0225-x RESEARCH Open Access Determinants of exclusive breastfeeding among mothers of infants aged 6 to 12 months in Gwanda District, Zimbabwe Paddington T. Mundagowa1*, Elizabeth M. Chadambuka1, Pugie T. Chimberengwa2 and Fadzai Mukora-Mutseyekwa3 Abstract Background: In 2016, 98% of children in Zimbabwe received breastmilk, however only 40% of babies under six months were exclusively breastfed 24 h prior to data collection. A 2014 survey revealed that Matabeleland South Province had the country’s highest starvation rates and food insecurities were rife. This study aimed at investigating maternal, infant, household, environmental and cultural factors influencing exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) practice in Gwanda District. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from January to March 2018. Interviews used pretested structured questionnaires for 225 mothers of infants aged between six and twelve months at immunization outreach points and health facilities. Descriptive statistics, bivariate and multivariate analysis estimated the association between the dependent and independent variables. Exclusive breastfeeding was defined as feeding an infant on breast milk only from birth up to the age of six months. Results: The majority of mothers (n = 193; 89%) had knowledge about EBF and 189 (84%) expressed a positive attitude towards the practice, however, only 81 (36%) practiced exclusive breastfeeding. The most common complementary food/fluid given to the infants was plain water (n = 85; 59%). Predictors for EBF were: maternal Human Immuno-deficiency Virus positive status (Odds Ratio [OR] 0.30; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.17, 0.56) and being economically independent (OR 0.41; 95% CI 0.21, 0.79).
    [Show full text]
  • TREATMENT SITES — Southern Africa HIV and AIDS Information LISTED by PROVINCE and AREA Dissemination Service
    ARV TREATMENT SITES Southern Africa HIV and AIDS Information LISTED BY PROVINCE AND AREA Dissemination Service MASVINGO · Bulilima: Plumtree District hospital: · Bikita: Silveira Mission Hospital: Tel: (038)324 Tel. (019) 2291; 2661-3 · Chiredzi: Hippo Valley Estates Clinic: · Gwanda: Gwanda OI Clinic: Tel: (084)22661-3: Tel: (031)2264 - Mangwe: St. Annes Brunapeg: · Chiredzi: Colin Saunders Hosp. Tel: (082) 361/466 AN HIV/AIDS Tel: (033)6387:6255 · Kezi-Matobo: Tshelanyemba Mission Hosp: · Chiredzi: Chiredzi District Hosp.: Tel: (033) Tel: (082) 254 · Gutu: Gutu Mission Hosp: · Maphisa District Hosp: Tel. (082) 244 Tel: (030)2323:2313:2631:3229 · Masvingo: Morgenster Mission Hosp: MIDLANDS Tel: (039)262123 · Chivhu General Hosp: Tel: (056):2644:2351 TREATMENT - Masvingo Provincial Hosp: · Chirumhanzu: Muvonde Hosp: Tel: (032)346 Tel: (039)263358/9; 263360 · Mvuma: St Theresas Mission Hosp: - Masvingo: Mukurira Memorial Private Hospital: Tel: (0308)208/373 Tel. (039) 264919 · Gweru: Gweru Provincial Hospital: ROADMAP FOR · Mwenezi: Matibi Mission Hospital: Tel. (0517) 323 Tel: (054) 221301:221108 · Zaka: Musiso Mission Hosp: · Gweru: Gweru City Hospital: Tel: (054) Tel: (034)2286:2322:2327/8 221301:221108 - Gweru: Mkoba 1 Polyclinic, Tel. MATEBELELAND NORTH - Gweru: Lower Gweru Rural Health Clinic: · Hwange: St Patricks Mission Hosp: Tel: (054) 227023 Tel: (081)34316-7 · Kwekwe: Kwekwe General Hospital: ZIMBABWE · Lupane: St Lukes Mission Hosp: Tel: (055)22333/7:24828/31 Tel: (0898)362:549:349 · Mberengwa: Mnene Mission Hospital: · Tsholotsho: Tsholotsho District Hosp: Tel. (0518) 352/3 Tel: (0878) 397/216/299 A guide for accessing anti- PRIVATE DOCTORS retroviral treatment in MATEBELELAND SOUTH For a list of private doctors who have special Zimbabwe: what it is, where · Beitbridge: Beitbridge District Hosp: training in ARV treatment and counselling, ask Tel.(086) 22496-8 your own doctor or contact SAfAIDS.
    [Show full text]
  • THE HISTORY of the TONGA and FISHING COOPERATIVES in BINGA DISTRICT 1950S-2015
    FACULTY OF ARTS DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY EMPOWERMENT OR CONTROL? : THE HISTORY OF THE TONGA AND FISHING COOPERATIVES IN BINGA DISTRICT 1950s-2015 BY HONOUR M.M. SINAMPANDE R131722P DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF ARTS IN PARTIAL FULLFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE HONOURS DEGREE IN HISTORY AT MIDLANDS STATE UNIVERSITY. NOVEMBER 2016 ZVISHAVANE: ZIMBABWE SUPERVISOR DR. T.M. MASHINGAIDZE APPROVAL FORM The undersigned certify that they have supervised the student Honour M.M Sinampande (R131722P) dissertation entitled Empowerment or Control? : The history of the Tonga and fishing cooperatives in Binga District 1950-210 submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Bachelor of Arts in History Honours Degree offered by Midlands State University. Dr. T.M Mashingaidze ……………………… SUPERVISOR DATE …….……………………………………… …………………………….. CHAIRPERSON DATE ….………………………………………… …………………………….. EXTERNAL EXAMINER DATE DECLARATION I, Honour M.M Sinampande declare that, Empowerment or Control? : The history of the Tonga and fishing cooperatives in Binga District 1950s-2015 is my own work and it has never been submitted before any degree or examination in any other university. I declare that all sources which have been used have been acknowledged. I authorize the Midlands State University to lend this to other institution or individuals for purposes of academic research only. Honour M.M Sinampande …………………………………………… 2016 DEDICATION This work is dedicated to my father Mr. H.M Sinampande and my mother Ms. J. Muleya for their inspiration, love and financial support throughout my four year degree programme. ABSTRACT The history of the Tonga have it that, the introduction of the fishing villages initially and then later the cooperative system in Binga District from the 1950s-2015 saw the Zambezi Tonga lose their fishing rights.
    [Show full text]