Survival Management by Living Systems. a General System Theory

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Survival Management by Living Systems. a General System Theory Survival Management by Living Systems. A General System Theory of the Space-Time Modularity and Evolution of Living Systems: Associations for the Reciprocal and Mutual Sharing of Advantages and DisAdvantages (ARMSADA). Pierre Bricage To cite this version: Pierre Bricage. Survival Management by Living Systems. A General System Theory of the Space-Time Modularity and Evolution of Living Systems: Associations for the Reciprocal and Mutual Sharing of Advantages and DisAdvantages (ARMSADA).. World Conference on Complex Systems, Nov 2014, Agadir, Morocco. hal-01065974 HAL Id: hal-01065974 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01065974 Submitted on 19 Sep 2014 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. http://web.univ-pau.fr/~bricage/ http://www.wccs14.org/index.html Advanced On Line Publication, September 12th 2014 Bricage P. (2014) Survival Management by Living Systems. A General System Theory of the Space-Time Modularity and Evolution of Living Systems: Associations for the Reciprocal and Mutual Sharing of Advantages and DisAdvantages ARMSADA., 16 p., Keynote, 2 nd World Conference on Complex Systems, Agadir, Morocco, 10-12 November 2014, http://web.univ-pau.fr/~bricage/files/bricage_Agadir2014.pdf Creative Commons free ShareAlike [email protected] Survival Management by Living Systems. A General System Theory of the Space-Time Modularity and Evolution of Living Systems : Associations for the Reciprocal and Mutual Sharing of Advantages and DisAdvantages ARMSADA Pierre BRICAGE AFSCET, IASCYS http://iascys.org Faculté des Sciences, UPPA, Pau, France, Europe http://web.univ-pau.fr/~bricage/ [email protected] Abstract—To survive that is 'to eat and not to be eaten'. Whatever The eukaryotic cell has emerged with the help of a RNA virus its spatial and temporal level of organization, any living system, from a mat of Monera [2]. In their new endophysiotope (ENDO: to survive and live on, has 'to be lucky' for 'to be at the right place internal, tope: space, physio: of functioning), the parceners are at the right time' [1]. Formed by embedments and juxtapositions absolutely dependent from each others. But, through the iteration of pre-existing systems in a new Whole, it is a part of food chains: process of new ARMSADAs' emerging, the new more and more it eats and is eaten, within an ecoexotope of survival (EXO) that it complex system-of-systems (Fig. 1) is more and more independent shares with other living systems. But 'soon or late it is impossible from its EXO. There are never advantages without dis- not to be eaten.' Man is not an exception! The modularity of living advantages. To survive that is to turn disadvantages into systems allows both a partial location and a global recycling of advantages and to avoid advantages turning to disadvantages. matter and energy. The pleiotropy of structures and functions, The cell apoptosis results from the systemic dys-functioning of its allowing 'to make of a stone several knocks', is a mechanism of ARMSADA, the death of an endangered internal partner (the exaptation. The ago-antagonistic relations balance, within any Monera' parts: the population of mitochondria or the nucleus) ecoexotope (EXO: external, tope: space, eco: of inhabitation), leads to the endosyncenosis death. Cancer is a breaking of the leads sooner or later to predators disappearance, with a cell's ARMSADA [3]. Cells that should have to die, because of reduction of biodiversity. The spatial and temporal structuring external dangers, thanks to escapes of internal dormant viruses and functioning are associated with scaling independent, local do not. The new endophysiotope (ENDO) survives through a and global, qualitative characteristics (gauge invariance) and metamorphosis but the previous EXO, the organism, is altered quantitative laws (power laws) which allow the emergence of a and endangered. Into an ARMSADA each partner can survive new biodiversity through the systems merging into 'Associations only if the other ones survive first. Man is not an exception! for the Reciprocal and Mutual Sharing of Advantages and Dis- Advantages' (ARMSADA). They are more and more independent from the new global level of organization and the previous local Keywords: agoantagonism, 'Associations for the Reciprocal and situations of emergence. The local actors become more and more Mutual Sharing of Advantages and DisAdvantages' (ARMSADA mutually integrated into their more and more new global Whole. http://armsada.eu), breakage, cancer, capacity to be hosted And reversely (systemic constructal law), the global Whole is (HOSTED), competition, cybernetics, ecoexotope (EXO), more and more integrating local parceners. The evolution of embedment, endophysiotope (ENDO), endosyncenosis (CENO), living systems is often seen as a cooperative evolution resulting epigenetic, evolution, exaptation, food chain, fractal, heritage(s), from altruist behaviors, modeled or simulated using games like hosting capacity (HOSTING), juxtaposition, limit(s), limitation(s), the prisoners' dilemma game, showing why 2 individuals might parasitism, phylotagmotaphology, power law, systemic constructal not cooperate, even if it appears that it is in their best interests to law, prisoners' dilemma game, system-of-systems, systemics, virus. do so. But the law of the strongest is not-at-all the best ! The only way to escape for a while from the struggle is to enter into an I. INTRODUCTION ARMSADA. A lichen is both an organism and an ecosystem, a cell A swarm of bees is not at all a population of individual is also an ecosystem and an endosyncenosis (CENO: to meet and organisms. The swarm is an organism which regulates its fuse, syn: into a system, endo: with a new internal structural and internal temperature depending on the external one. Into the functional organization), both are ARMSADAs. An ARMSADA Whole (the swarm system), the actors (the bees) are in emerges when the partners lose simultaneously the capacity to interaction. Into our organism (the Whole), our cells (the kill the other ones. In the new Whole, all that is an advantage for actors), like in the swarm itself, all are functionally defined by a partner is a disadvantage for the other ones. The 'parceners' their endophysiotope (ENDO: internal, tope: space, physio: of are fused together 'for the best and for the worst'. If some benefits functioning) and their ecoexotope (EXO: external, tope: space, they are only for their Wholeness which expresses new abilities. eco: of inhabitation), that together define the system as a The nitrogen fixation of the legumes' nodes emerges from the Wholeness [4], and the interface of exchange between ENDO fusion of a population of Monera with, and within, an organism. and EXO (Fig. 1). On the ice-bank of the Antarctic Continent Penguins are II. THE GAUGE INVARIANCE OF LIVING SYSTEMS walking slowly. They have no need to run because there is no Each living system is the guest of a hosting environment danger for them here. And that is a great advantage because the [10], its EcoExoTope [11] of survival (EXO). Integrated into Penguins' body is not built for running ! But there is nothing to food chains, he is a parcener, undivided from all the other eat on the ice-bank. That is a great disadvantage ! When it is living forms. In order to survive he must first 'to eat'. Then, if very cold you need a great food amount to survive. There are he may 'not to be eaten', and if its EndoPhysioTope (ENDO) never advantages without disadvantages! Into the water of the can grow in mass, he must itself 'to survive its self', to generate Antarctic Ocean, Penguins are swimming very fast. They have an offspring and eventually to grow in number. Food chains are two reasons to do so. Firstly they must swim faster than the juxtaposed and encased (Fig. 1) like times and spaces [1, 12]. fishes. To survive they have to eat a lot of them. There is a lot of fishes there and the Penguins' body is built to swim very fast. That is a great advantage! Secondly they must swim faster than the Killer Whales that are eating Penguins to survive too. Wherever the Penguins are there are never advantages without disadvantages. They will survive as long as they can transform disadvantages into advantages and prevent advantages from turning into disadvantages. Figure 2. The 7 functional capacities that defines a level of organization. Each capacity Cj, with 1!j!7, is all at once the result and the origin of the other ones and itself, Cj = f(Cj,Ck,Cl,Cm,Cn,Cp,Cq) with 1!j,k,l,m,n,p,q!7 and j"k"l"m"n"p"q, and simultaneously the capacities, mutually, modulate reciprocally their expression (colored arrows are indicating reciprocal Figure 1. What a system is: Ecoexotope and endophysiotope. interactions): systemic constructal law [4, 13, 14]. The capacity of moving - top: a system is made of 3 kinds of entities, the actors (colored points), matter and energy flows is the first requirement -1- before the capacity of their interactions (blue, green and red arrows) & their Whole (the system). mass growth -2-. The matter and energy flows and the growth are controlled - down: always a system-of-systems, the endophysiotope ENDO of a i level through the capacity to respond to stimulation -3-. All of that is allowed of organization is the ecoexotope EXO of survival of previous i-n levels. Due because the internal and external parts of the system exhibit a correlated to the actors semi-autonomy, abilities of previous levels are lost, new ones are structural and functional organization -4-, into spaces [5], through times [1, gained.
Recommended publications
  • Living Systems Theory (Under Construction)
    Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Faculty and Researcher Publications Faculty and Researcher Publications 2008-06-30 Living Systems Theory (under construction) Bradley, Gordon http://hdl.handle.net/10945/38246 Living Systems Theory (under construction) Agranoff, B. W. (2003). Obituaries: James Grier Miller. Retrieved May 26, 2008, from University of Michigan: The University Record Online: http://www.ur.umich.edu/0203/Feb03_03/obits.shtml Bertalanffy, Ludwig von. (1968). General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications. New York: George Braziller. Crawford, Raymond R. (1981). An Application of Living Systems Theory to Combat Models. Master’s Thesis. Monterey, CA: Naval Postgraduate School. http://stinet.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA101103 Duncan, Daniel M. (1972). James G. Miller's Living Systems Theory: Issues for Management Thought and Practice. The Academy of Management Journal, 15:4, 513-523. http://www.jstor.org/stable/255145?seq=1 Kuhn, Alfred. (1979). Differences vs. Similarities in Living Systems. Contemporary Sociology, 8:5, 691- 696. http://www.jstor.org/sici?sici=0094- 3061(197909)8%3A5%3C691%3ADVSILS%3E2.0.CO%3B2-4 Miller, James Grier. (1979). Response to the Reviewers of Living Systems. Contemporary Sociology, 8:5, 705-715. http://www.jstor.org/sici?sici=0094- 3061(197909)8%3A5%3C705%3ARTTROL%3E2.0.CO%3B2-8 Miller, James Grier. (1995). Living Systems. Niwot: University of Colorado. (out of print) Oliva, Terence A. and R. Eric Reidenbach. (1981). General Living Systems Theory and Marketing: A Framework for Analysis. Journal of Marketing, 45:4, 30-37. http://www.jstor.org/sici?sici=0022- 2429(198123)45%3A4%3C30%3AGLSTAM%3E2.0.CO%3B2-R Parent, Elaine.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from Living Systems Governance Pierre Bricage
    Education for sustainability: lessons from living systems governance Pierre Bricage To cite this version: Pierre Bricage. Education for sustainability: lessons from living systems governance. 3rd IASCYS international meeting ”Research Development and Education of Systems Science and Cybernetics”, International Academy for Systems and Cybernetic Sciences, Oct 2017, Chengdu, China. halshs- 01705968 HAL Id: halshs-01705968 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01705968 Submitted on 10 Feb 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Public Domain Education for sustainability: lessons from living systems governance. Pierre BRICAGE AFSCET, the French Society for Systems and Cybernetic Sciences, ENSAM, Paris, France, IASCYS, the International Academy for Systems and Cybernetic Sciences, IRSEEM, ESIGELEC, technopôle du Madrillet, 76801 St-Étienne du Rouvray, France E-mail: [email protected] Abstract To survive that is 'to eat and not to be eaten'. Whatever its spatial and temporal level of organisation, every living system, to survive and 'to itself survive its self', owns 7 invariant capacities: the gauge invariance paradigm (figure 1). Emerging by embedments and juxtapositions of previous systems, every living system-of-systems (figure 2) is both dependent and independent from its new global level of organisation (endophysiotope) and past and present local situations of emergence (ecoexotope).
    [Show full text]
  • Molecules, Information and the Origin of Life: What Is Next?
    molecules Perspective Molecules, Information and the Origin of Life: What Is Next? Salvatore Chirumbolo 1,* and Antonio Vella 2 1 Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy 2 Verona-Unit of Immunology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37134 Verona, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-0458027645 Abstract: How life did originate and what is life, in its deepest foundation? The texture of life is known to be held by molecules and their chemical-physical laws, yet a thorough elucidation of the aforementioned questions still stands as a puzzling challenge for science. Focusing solely on molecules and their laws has indirectly consolidated, in the scientific knowledge, a mechanistic (reductionist) perspective of biology and medicine. This occurred throughout the long historical path of experimental science, affecting subsequently the onset of the many theses and speculations about the origin of life and its maintenance. Actually, defining what is life, asks for a novel epistemology, a ground on which living systems’ organization, whose origin is still questioned via chemistry, physics and even philosophy, may provide a new key to focus onto the complex nature of the human being. In this scenario, many issues, such as the role of information and water structure, have been long time neglected from the theoretical basis on the origin of life and marginalized as a kind of scenic backstage. On the contrary, applied science and technology went ahead on considering molecules as the sole leading components in the scenery. Water physics and information dynamics may have a role in living systems much more fundamental than ever expected.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is a Complex System?
    What is a Complex System? James Ladyman, James Lambert Department of Philosophy, University of Bristol, U.K. Karoline Wiesner Department of Mathematics and Centre for Complexity Sciences, University of Bristol, U.K. (Dated: March 8, 2012) Complex systems research is becoming ever more important in both the natural and social sciences. It is commonly implied that there is such a thing as a complex system, different examples of which are studied across many disciplines. However, there is no concise definition of a complex system, let alone a definition on which all scientists agree. We review various attempts to characterize a complex system, and consider a core set of features that are widely associated with complex systems in the literature and by those in the field. We argue that some of these features are neither necessary nor sufficient for complexity, and that some of them are too vague or confused to be of any analytical use. In order to bring mathematical rigour to the issue we then review some standard measures of complexity from the scientific literature, and offer a taxonomy for them, before arguing that the one that best captures the qualitative notion of the order produced by complex systems is that of the Statistical Complexity. Finally, we offer our own list of necessary conditions as a characterization of complexity. These conditions are qualitative and may not be jointly sufficient for complexity. We close with some suggestions for future work. I. INTRODUCTION The idea of complexity is sometimes said to be part of a new unifying framework for science, and a revolution in our understanding of systems the behaviour of which has proved difficult to predict and control thus far, such as the human brain and the world economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Are Living Systems the Key to Sustainable Lunar Exploration? R
    2009 Annual Meeting of LEAG (2009) 2045.pdf Are Living Systems the Key to Sustainable Lunar Exploration? R. R. Zimmerman, Symbiotek Systems (Portola Valley, CA; [email protected]) Introduction: Elements of sustainability in planners to reduce risks and costs while defining science, operations and politics, should be incorporated systems requirements for future missions. Space into long range planning for Lunar Exploration [1]. Biology holds the key to space based living systems. Before lunar exploration (on, of, and from the Moon) can enter a sustainable phase it must first experience a Biology: growth phase. Alternative definitions for Space Biology: Biology (Human - effects & sustainability, models and metrics for sustainability, countermeasures, cellular or plant systems used in a and a survey of analogs should be acquired, analyzed closed ecological environmental support system and synthesized. - leading to recommendations for (CELSS)) may hold the key to sustainable lunar further research and a timeline for refinement. exploration - both in terms of public support and Exploration in the national interest [2, 3] also offers a operational efficiencies for life support. It is still an broad set of development perspectives with the insight open question as to whether humans can truly live on of greater payback from longer duration or more other worlds [5] – not merely for days, weeks of intensively populated missions. The issues of Living months but for extended duration missions of years – Systems and Sustainable Exploration span the possible much less permanently in long term settlements. The mission option space – whether to enable a lunar base, transportation logistics and costs imply that long Mars mission or other missions with long duration duration stays are attractive, yet the risk mitigation is cruise phases [Augustine] with lower crew risk and not well understood.
    [Show full text]
  • GST Isomorphies of SPT, Represented Or Not, in Odum's
    Emergy Synthesis 10, Proceedings of the 10th Biennial Emergy Conference (2019) 34 GST Isomorphies of SPT, Represented or Not, in Odum’s General Systems Ecology and Models Len Troncale ABSTRACT The Systems Processes Theory (SPT) is a prototype or candidate systems science (SS) and general theory of systems (GTS). In 1991, Odum was elected President of the International Society for the Systems Sciences (ISSS) at the invitation of this author. The ISSS was the historical base for attempts at research on a general systems theory. Odum was a regular contributor to, and supporter of general theory approaches for decades. This paper presents the work of Odum on emergy, transformity, and ecology as a Lifework worthy of classification as both a prototype SS and GTS. Presence or absence of isomorphies is presented as an historical sine qua non criterium for both SS & GTS. The aforementioned SPT presents a high-resolution listing of 110 candidate isomorphies, a moderate-resolution index of 80, and a constrained or minimal list of 55, which are many more than previous and current GTS workers present, analyze, or include. An index analysis of four of Odum’s books indicates that he elucidates 20 of the 80 moderate-resolution isomorphies to some degree. The paper also argues that some of these 20, represented in the Odum Opus, do not include all of the key attributes that SPT contains in its 35 Information Categories on each Isomorph. This paper shows which key isomorphs that Odum leaves out and indicates that some of Odum’s work shows that SPT could profitably adopt some of his isomorphic insights as new candidate isomorphs to improve and widen its coverage.
    [Show full text]
  • Extending Life Concepts to Complex Systems*
    Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems 11(1), 37-50, 2013 EXTENDING LIFE CONCEPTS TO COMPLEX SYSTEMS* Jean Le Fur** The Center for Biology and Management of Populations, Joint Research Unit INRA/IRD/CIRAD/Agro.M Montferrier-sur-Lez, France DOI: 10.7906/indecs.11.1.4 Received: 5 July 2012. Regular article Accepted: 22 January 2013. ABSTRACT There is still no consensus definition of complex systems. This article explores, as a heuristic approach, the possibility of using notions associated with life as transversal concepts for defining complex systems. This approach is developed within a general classification of systems, with complex systems considered as a general ‘living things’ category and living organisms as a specialised class within this category. Concepts associated with life are first explored in the context of complex systems: birth, death and lifetime, adaptation, ontogeny and growth, reproduction. Thereafter, a refutation approach is used to test the proposed classification against a set of diverse systems, including a reference case, edge cases and immaterial complex systems. The summary of this analysis is then used to generate a definition of complex systems, based on the proposal, and within the background of cybernetics, complex adaptive systems and biology. Using notions such as ‘birth’ or ‘lifespan’ as transversal concepts may be of heuristic value for the generic characterization of complex systems, opening up new lines of research for improving their definition. KEY WORDS complex systems, life concepts, refutation approach, heuristic CLASSIFICATION JEL: Z13 PACS: 87.18.-h, 89.75.-k *A preliminary version of this work was presented at the European Conference on Complex Systems, *Lisbon, Portugal, 11-15 Sept.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Systems Theory?
    What is Systems Theory? Systems theory is an interdisciplinary theory about the nature of complex systems in nature, society, and science, and is a framework by which one can investigate and/or describe any group of objects that work together to produce some result. This could be a single organism, any organization or society, or any electro-mechanical or informational artifact. As a technical and general academic area of study it predominantly refers to the science of systems that resulted from Bertalanffy's General System Theory (GST), among others, in initiating what became a project of systems research and practice. Systems theoretical approaches were later appropriated in other fields, such as in the structural functionalist sociology of Talcott Parsons and Niklas Luhmann . Contents - 1 Overview - 2 History - 3 Developments in system theories - 3.1 General systems research and systems inquiry - 3.2 Cybernetics - 3.3 Complex adaptive systems - 4 Applications of system theories - 4.1 Living systems theory - 4.2 Organizational theory - 4.3 Software and computing - 4.4 Sociology and Sociocybernetics - 4.5 System dynamics - 4.6 Systems engineering - 4.7 Systems psychology - 5 See also - 6 References - 7 Further reading - 8 External links - 9 Organisations // Overview 1 / 20 What is Systems Theory? Margaret Mead was an influential figure in systems theory. Contemporary ideas from systems theory have grown with diversified areas, exemplified by the work of Béla H. Bánáthy, ecological systems with Howard T. Odum, Eugene Odum and Fritj of Capra , organizational theory and management with individuals such as Peter Senge , interdisciplinary study with areas like Human Resource Development from the work of Richard A.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking the Pragmatic Systems Biology and Systems-Theoretical Biology Divide: Toward a Complexity-Inspired Epistemology of Systems Biomedicine T
    Medical Hypotheses 131 (2019) 109316 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Medical Hypotheses journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/mehy Rethinking the pragmatic systems biology and systems-theoretical biology divide: Toward a complexity-inspired epistemology of systems biomedicine T Srdjan Kesić Department of Neurophysiology, Institute for Biological Research “Siniša Stanković”, University of Belgrade, Despot Stefan Blvd. 142, 11060 Belgrade, Serbia ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: This paper examines some methodological and epistemological issues underlying the ongoing “artificial” divide Systems biology between pragmatic-systems biology and systems-theoretical biology. The pragmatic systems view of biology has Cybernetics encountered problems and constraints on its explanatory power because pragmatic systems biologists still tend Second-order cybernetics to view systems as mere collections of parts, not as “emergent realities” produced by adaptive interactions Complexity between the constituting components. As such, they are incapable of characterizing the higher-level biological Complex biological systems phenomena adequately. The attempts of systems-theoretical biologists to explain these “emergent realities” Epistemology of complexity using mathematics also fail to produce satisfactory results. Given the increasing strategic importance of systems biology, both from theoretical and research perspectives, we suggest that additional epistemological and methodological insights into the possibility of further integration between
    [Show full text]
  • Lemke Feeling and Meaning Trifonas Handbook SENT
    Feeling and Meaning: A Unitary Bio-Semiotic Account Jay Lemke Department of Communication Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition University of California, San Diego Claims and Scope I will argue that feeling and meaning are two aspects of the same material processes, that the dynamical system in which these processes occur is always larger than what we think of as an individual human organism, and that meaning and feeling as processes always occur across multiple timescales and scales of organization in complex open dynamical systems and have their origins in systems that may be simpler than single cells. I will argue that both feeling and meaning as processes are distributed, situated, context-dependent, active, and culture-specific. In the course of these arguments we will consider the relations of a unitary feeling-and-meaning process to movement and the animacy of living systems, to the semantics of language and more generally to multi-modal semiotic resources, and to experiential qualia. I have by no means put together a complete, consistent theoretical model of these matters. I do not in fact believe that doing so is either possible or desirable. Given the richness, complexity, messiness, and inevitable problems of self-reference involved, the best we can do is to assemble a toolkit of discourses and practices with which we can do useful bricolage for whatever our purposes may be in some specific inquiry or project. Whatever I offer here, more work will always need to be done to make sense of any actual lived trajectory of feeling-and-meaning.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability As "Psyclically" Defined -- /
    Alternative view of segmented documents via Kairos 22nd June 2007 | Draft Emergence of Cyclical Psycho-social Identity Sustainability as "psyclically" defined -- / -- Introduction Identity as expression of interlocking cycles Viability and sustainability: recycling Transforming "patterns of consumption" From "static" to "dynamic" to "cyclic" Emergence of new forms of identity and organization Embodiment of rhythm Generic understanding of "union of international associations" Three-dimensional "cycles"? Interlocking cycles as the key to identity Identity as a strange attractor Periodic table of cycles -- and of psyclic identity? Complementarity of four strategic initiatives Development of psyclic awareness Space-centric vs Time-centric: an unfruitful confrontation? Metaphorical vehicles: temples, cherubim and the Mandelbrot set Kairos -- the opportune moment for self-referential re-identification Governance as the management of strategic cycles Possible pointers to further reflection on psyclicity References Introduction The identity of individuals and collectivities (groups, organizations, etc) is typically associated with an entity bounded in physical space or virtual space. The boundary may be defined geographically (even with "virtual real estate") or by convention -- notably when a process of recognition is involved, as with a legal entity. Geopolitical boundaries may, for example, define nation states. The focus here is on the extent to which many such entities are also to some degree, if not in large measure, defined by cycles in time. For example many organizations are defined by the periodicity of the statutory meetings by which they are governed, or by their budget or production cycles. Communities may be uniquely defined by conference cycles, religious cycles or festival cycles (eg Oberammergau). Biologically at least, the health and viability of individuals is defined by a multiplicity of cycles of which respiration is the most obvious -- death may indeed be defined by absence of any respiratory cycle.
    [Show full text]
  • Systems Theory"
    General By the same author: System Modern Theories of Development (in German, English, Spani~h) Nikolaus von Kues Theory Lebenswissenschaft und Bildung Theoretische Biologie J Foundations, Development, Applications Das Gefüge des Lebens Vom Molekül zur Organismenwelt Problems of Life (in German, English, French, Spanish, Dutch, Japanese) Auf den Pfaden des Lebens I by Ludwig von Bertalanffy Biophysik des Fliessgleichgewichts t Robots, Men and Minds University of Alberta Edmonton) Canada GEORGE BRAZILLER New York MANIBUS Nicolai de Cusa Cardinalis, Gottfriedi Guglielmi Leibnitii, ]oannis Wolfgangi de Goethe Aldique Huxleyi, neenon de Bertalanffy Pauli, S.J., antecessoris, cosmographi Copyright © 1968 by Ludwig von Bertalanffy All rights in this hook are reserved. For information address the publisher, George Braziller, lnc. One Park Avenue New York, N.Y. 10016 Foreword The present volume appears to demand some introductory notes clarifying its scope, content, and method of presentation. There is a large number of texts, monographs, symposia, etc., devoted to "systems" and "systems theory". "Systems Science," or one of its many synonyms, is rapidly becoming part of the estab­ lished university curriculum. This is predominantly a develop­ ment in engineering science in the broad sense, necessitated by the complexity of "systems" in modern technology, man-machine relations, programming and similar considerations which were not felt in yesteryear's technology but which have become im­ perative in the complex technological and social structures of the modern world. Systems theory, in this sense, is preeminently a mathematica! field, offering partly novel and highly sophisti­ cated techniques, closely linked with computer science, and essentially determined by the requirement to cope with a new sort of problem that has been appearing.
    [Show full text]