2016 Gsfc Final Web.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2016 Gsfc Final Web.Pdf inside ONE - Message from the Chief Technologist: Investing in NASA’s Future 2 Through Innovation and Collaboration TWO - Where Success Begins: 4 Aligning Investments to Goddard’s Lines of Business • Breakdown of FY16 Awards THREE - The Best in Collaboration and Infusion 6 • FY16 IRAD Innovators of the Year: NavCube Team • FY16 IRAD Honorable Mention: George Suarez and Team FOUR - The Year’s Notable Achievements: 9 Investment in Innovative Technologies Reaps Rewards • Award of New Instruments, Sounding-Rocket Missions, About the Cover Aircraft Campaigns, and Capabilities Pictured are just a few of • Technology Infusion and Demonstrations the technologists who are • Follow-On Funding to Advance Technology-Readiness Levels either pursuing or imple- • Mission Preparation and Completed Instruments menting new technologies. • Critical Support Capabilities • Patents From left, moving clockwise: technologists John 18 FIVE - A Focus on CubeSats/Smallsats: The Pursuit of Reliability Kolasinski (left), • New Missions Ted Kostiuk (center), and • Upcoming CubeSat Missions Tilak Hewagama; • Critical Support Capabilities Goddard scientist Al • Technologies to Watch Kogut; technologist Michael Krainak; FY16 24 SIX - Rising Stars: Technologies to Watch Innovators of the Year • Astrophysics Jennifer Donaldson, • Communications and Navigation Monther Hasouneh, and • Crosscutting Technology and Capabilities Dave Petrick; and • Earth Science technologists Murzy • Heliophysics Jhabvala and Anh La. • Planetary Science • Suborbital Platforms and Range Services 30 SEVEN - Ending the Year with Celebration: Scenes from the FY16 IRAD Poster Session 35 EIGHT - A Beautiful Mind: A Tribute to Richard G. Lyon (1958-2016) 1 Message from the Chief Technologist: Investing in NASA’s Future Through Innovation and Collaboration At the end of each year, we evaluate Maybe even more exciting for the team the effectiveness of the center’s Internal was the announcement that the exist- Research and Development (IRAD) pro- ing Navigator GPS was included in the gram. We ask several questions, the most Guinness World Records for the highest- important being: are we truly advancing altitude GPS fix — a feat accomplished the technologies that NASA will need in by NASA’s Magnetospheric Multiscale the future? mission. This high-profile mission uses Navigator to maintain the exacting orbit The take-away in 2016 was an emphatic of its four identically equipped spacecraft yes. Through innovation and collabora- now flying far above the GPS constella- tion, our impressive scope of Goddard tion of satellites. technologies is being infused into new missions and instruments. Just as exciting, Infusion in All Forms some of our technologies are being used to dramatical- Indeed, creating technologies that NASA needs is ly improve the performance of already highly successful a hallmark of the IRAD program. Although examples IRAD-supported capabilities. abound — some of which we briefly describe in this NavCube is the perfect example of this. report — I would be remiss in not highlighting the accomplishments of Goddard technologist George Created by the merger of two highly acclaimed, Suarez and his team. They have created, without much IRAD-supported technologies — SpaceCube 2.0 and fanfare, diminutive circuits that both enable high-profile Navigator GPS — NavCube will fly as an experiment missions and increase the reliability of CubeSat mis- on the International Space Station in 2018. There, it not sions — particularly important given NASA’s movement only will demonstrate its dramatically improved naviga- toward greater use of these platforms. tional capabilities, but possibly X-ray communications in space — a potential NASA first. In short, the teams I also would be negligent in not mentioning here the collaborated, blended their technologies, and created success of one of Goddard’s most prodigious scientists a capability that could extend the reliable use of the and innovators, Harvey Moseley. NASA awarded GPS signal to lunar orbits in the future. These successes him and his team millions of dollars to build the High- earned the NavCube team the FY16 IRAD Innovators of Resolution Mid-Infrared Spectrometer — an instrument the Year award (see page 6 for details). that employs a state-of-the-art, Goddard-developed 2 bolometer system as well as a Cornell University-devel- In this report, we highlight other notable achievements oped Fabry-Perot Interferometer. Through collabora- that underscore how Goddard, through its IRAD pro- tion, Moseley and his multi-institution team succeeded in gram, is seeding technologies that NASA needs. securing this important win. In closing, we are thrilled that our highly diverse Likewise, Principal Investigator Bernie Rauscher, who program is supporting the development of innovative, partnered with the Lawrence Livermore Laboratory to strategically important technologies. We are thrilled develop a rad-hard single photon detector, achieved that our investments are reducing mission risk and, in all objectives in FY16 and NASA’s next-generation many cases, involving partnerships with internal and ex- Wide-Field Infrared Survey Telescope has begun sup- ternal groups, enabling a far greater cross-fertilization porting the technology-development effort. of ideas and capabilities. In short, we are delighted that we are fulfilling our mission as a science and spaceflight Along the same lines, the developers of Goddard’s center — developing the technologies NASA will need MUSTANG avionics technology showed the value to carry out mission science across all scientific areas. of their technology, and a high-profile mission and an instrument-development effort have committed to using and advancing the technology. Peter Hughes Chief Technologist Goddard Space Flight Center This is a portion of the spaceflight modem flying on NASA’s Laser Communications Relay Demonstration. A Goddard team plans to replicate this fiber-optic receiver, replacing portions of it with a next-generation circuit. 3 Where Success Begins: Aligning Investments to Goddard’s Lines of Business Year after year, our technologists continue to secure Lines of Business: At A Glance instrument and new mission starts as well as follow-on funding to further advance their technologies at levels Astrophysics that more than compensate for our initial investment in Focuses on missions and technolo- their technologies. gies enabling the study of galax- ies, stars, and planetary systems We believe the secret to our success for both God- beyond our own solar system. dard’s Internal Research and Development (IRAD) and Center Innovation Fund (CIF) programs is our method- ology — the focus and discipline we employ to identify Communications and Navigation investment priorities, unmet needs, and target Supports systems and technologies opportunities. needed for responsive communica- tions and navigation. Selection Criteria for IRAD and CIF Under the IRAD program, for example, we fund only those efforts that map to one or more of Goddard’s strategic lines of business. In addition, we adhere to Crosscutting Technology strict selection standards and require principal investi- and Capabilities Addresses capabilities applicable gators to compete for their awards. to more than one strategic line of business, everything from nanoma- For NASA’s CIF, we use slightly different criteria. terials and electronics to detectors NASA’s CIF is specifically aimed at advancing highly in- and system architectures. novative, potentially high-impact projects that are early in their development. Successful CIF proposals also must Earth Science demonstrate technical merit, feasibility, relevance, and Supports technologies and advanced science instruments value to NASA. Many also leverage partner resources needed to observe and understand and several have the potential to contribute signifi- changes in Earth’s natural systems cantly to national needs. and processes, including severe weather, the atmosphere, the oceans, sea ice and glaciers, and the land surface. 4 Heliophysics Suborbital Platforms Conducts research on the sun, its and Range Services extended solar-system environment Supports systems typically used (the heliosphere), and interactions to place payloads into subor- of Earth, other planets, small bod- bital attitude, including sounding ies, and interstellar gas with the rockets, balloons, and manned and heliosphere. unmanned aircraft. In recent years, the LOB has expanded to include CubeSat capabilities. Range ser- Planetary Science vices include assets for conducting, Supports technologies to explore launching, and operating missions. the solar system, particularly instruments for landers and orbiting spacecraft. Breakdown of FY16 Awards Goddard is a successful organization. It has proven adept at creating, fine-tuning, and adapting emerging technologies largely because the center focuses on strategic technological areas that match the skills of the workforce and the center’s identified needs. Here is the breakdown of our FY16 investments. 5 “We invest in R&D to create capabilities that NASA needs. NavCube, in particular, represents infusion at its best. The cross-pollination of the two technologies gives NASA another tool for carrying out a range of science missions. The possibility that it might help demonstrate X-ray communications in space — a technology in which we also have a vested interest — is particularly exciting.” — Goddard Chief Technologist Peter M. Hughes FY16 IRAD Innovators of the Year: The Best in Collaboration
Recommended publications
  • Uranometría Argentina Bicentenario
    URANOMETRÍA ARGENTINA BICENTENARIO Reedición electrónica ampliada, ilustrada y actualizada de la URANOMETRÍA ARGENTINA Brillantez y posición de las estrellas fijas, hasta la séptima magnitud, comprendidas dentro de cien grados del polo austral. Resultados del Observatorio Nacional Argentino, Volumen I. Publicados por el observatorio 1879. Con Atlas (1877) 1 Observatorio Nacional Argentino Dirección: Benjamin Apthorp Gould Observadores: John M. Thome - William M. Davis - Miles Rock - Clarence L. Hathaway Walter G. Davis - Frank Hagar Bigelow Mapas del Atlas dibujados por: Albert K. Mansfield Tomado de Paolantonio S. y Minniti E. (2001) Uranometría Argentina 2001, Historia del Observatorio Nacional Argentino. SECyT-OA Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba. Santiago Paolantonio 2010 La importancia de la Uranometría1 Argentina descansa en las sólidas bases científicas sobre la cual fue realizada. Esta obra, cuidada en los más pequeños detalles, se debe sin dudas a la genialidad del entonces director del Observatorio Nacional Argentino, Dr. Benjamin A. Gould. Pero nada de esto se habría hecho realidad sin la gran habilidad, el esfuerzo y la dedicación brindada por los cuatro primeros ayudantes del Observatorio, John M. Thome, William M. Davis, Miles Rock y Clarence L. Hathaway, así como de Walter G. Davis y Frank Hagar Bigelow que se integraron más tarde a la institución. Entre éstos, J. M. Thome, merece un lugar destacado por la esmerada revisión, control de las posiciones y determinaciones de brillos, tal como el mismo Director lo reconoce en el prólogo de la publicación. Por otro lado, Albert K. Mansfield tuvo un papel clave en la difícil confección de los mapas del Atlas. La Uranometría Argentina sobresale entre los trabajos realizados hasta ese momento, por múltiples razones: Por la profundidad en magnitud, ya que llega por vez primera en este tipo de empresa a la séptima.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter Archive the Skyscraper April 2015
    the vol. 42 no. 4 Skyscraper April 2015 AmAteur AstronomicAl society of rhode islAnd 47 PeePtoAd roAd north scituAte, rhode islAnd 02857 www.theskyscrapers.org In this issue Friday, April 10, 7:00pm 2 President’s Message at Seagrave Memorial Observatory 3 The Sun, Moon & Comparing Antarctic geology to what we can Planets in April find on Mars by Jay Dickson 4 The Cold Never Bothered Me Anyway The McMurdo Dry Valleys in Antarctica host geologic features that form nowhere else on Earth but are strikingly similar to features observed on Mars. For this reason, scientists 6 Astronomical Events have been exploring this terrain for decades to understand the limits of life on Earth and Determine Easter Observance the potential for life elsewhere in the solar system. While it is the most stable landscape in the world, hosting buried ice millions of years old, the Dry Valleys do experience small 7 Rings of the Solar System amounts of surface erosion due to liquid water over long periods of time. Our group has been documenting these processes for many years using high-resolution time-lapse pho- 8 Lenticular Galaxy in Sextans tography and incorporating these data into long-term climate data to understand how NGC 3115 water behaves in polar landscapes generally inhospitable to liquid water. This presentation will show dozens of these time-lapse movies to show how barren landscapes evolve over 10 Secretary & Treasurer time, and discuss what this means for the potential of liquid water on present-day Mars. Jay Dickson is a planetary scientist who has studied the evolution and fate of water ice on Mars and in Antarctica for more than a decade.
    [Show full text]
  • Lists and Charts of Autostar Named Stars
    APPENDIX A Lists and Charts of Autostar Named Stars Table A.I provides a list of named stars that are stored in the Autostar database. Following the list, there are constellation charts which show where the stars are located. The names are in alphabetical orderalong with their Latin designation (see Appendix B for complete list ofconstellations). Names in brackets 0 in the table denote a different spelling to one that is known in the list. The star's co-ordinates are set to the same as accuracy as the Autostar co-ordinates i.e. the RA or Dec 'sec' values are omitted. Autostar option: Select Item: Object --+ Star --+ Named 215 216 Appendix A Table A.1. Autostar Named Star List RA Dec Named Star Fig. Ref. latin Designation Hr Min Deg Min Mag Acamar A5 Theta Eridanus 2 58 .2 - 40 18 3.2 Achernar A5 Alpha Eridanus 1 37.6 - 57 14 0.4 Acrux A4 Alpha Crucis 12 26.5 - 63 05 1.3 Adara A2 EpsilonCanis Majoris 6 58.6 - 28 58 1.5 Albireo A4 BetaCygni 19 30.6 ++27 57 3.0 Alcor Al0 80 Ursae Majoris 13 25.2 + 54 59 4.0 Alcyone A9 EtaTauri 3 47.4 + 24 06 2.8 Aldebaran A9 Alpha Tauri 4 35.8 + 16 30 0.8 Alderamin A3 Alpha Cephei 21 18.5 + 62 35 2.4 Algenib A7 Gamma Pegasi 0 13.2 + 15 11 2.8 Algieba (Algeiba) A6 Gamma leonis 10 19.9 + 19 50 2.6 Algol A8 Beta Persei 3 8.1 + 40 57 2.1 Alhena A5 Gamma Geminorum 6 37.6 + 16 23 1.9 Alioth Al0 EpsilonUrsae Majoris 12 54.0 + 55 57 1.7 Alkaid Al0 Eta Ursae Majoris 13 47.5 + 49 18 1.8 Almaak (Almach) Al Gamma Andromedae 2 3.8 + 42 19 2.2 Alnair A6 Alpha Gruis 22 8.2 - 46 57 1.7 Alnath (Elnath) A9 BetaTauri 5 26.2
    [Show full text]
  • Spectroscopic Atlas for Amateur Astronomers 1
    Spectroscopic Atlas for Amateur Astronomers 1 Spectroscopic Atlas for Amateur Astronomers A Guide to the Stellar Spectral Classes Richard Walker Version 3.0 03/2012 Spectroscopic Atlas for Amateur Astronomers 2 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 7 2 Selection, Preparation and Presentation of the Spectra ........................................... 9 3 Terms, Definitions and Abbreviations........................................................................ 12 4 The Fraunhofer Lines .................................................................................................... 14 5 Overview and Characteristics of Stellar Spectral Classes ..................................... 15 6 Appearance of Elements and Molecules in the Spectra......................................... 20 7 Spectral Class O ............................................................................................................ 21 8 Wolf Rayet Stars ............................................................................................................ 28 9 Spectral Class B............................................................................................................. 32 10 LBV Stars......................................................................................................................... 39 11 Be Stars ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Conception D'un Modèle De Visibilité D'étoile À L'oeil Nu. Application À L'identification Des Décans Égyptiens
    Conception d’un modèle de visibilité d’étoile à l’oeil nu. Application à l’identification des décans égyptiens. Karine Gadré To cite this version: Karine Gadré. Conception d’un modèle de visibilité d’étoile à l’oeil nu. Application à l’identification des décans égyptiens.. Planète et Univers [physics]. Université Paul Sabatier - Toulouse III, 2008. Français. tel-00361227 HAL Id: tel-00361227 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00361227 Submitted on 13 Feb 2009 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. THÈSETHÈSE En vue de l'obtention du DOCTORAT DE L’UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE Délivré par l'Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier Discipline ou spécialité : Astronomie Présentée et soutenue par Karine GADRE le 21 mai 2008 Titre : Conception d'un modèle de visibilité d'étoile à l'oeil nu. Application à l'identification des décans égyptiens JURY Georges BALMINO, Ingénieur CNES Emérite (Examinateur) Alain BLANCHARD, Professeur UPS (Examinateur) Nicole CAPITAINE, Astronome à l'Observatoire de Paris (Rapporteur) Leo DEPUYDT, Professeur à Brown University
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Astronomy and Astrophysics, April 26, 2019
    April 28, 2019 Dr. France A. Córdova, Director National Science Foundation 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Suite 19000 Alexandria, VA 22314 Mr. James Bridenstine, Administrator Office of the Administrator NASA Headquarters Washington, DC 20546-0001 Mr. Richard Perry, Secretary of Energy U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 The Honorable Eddie Bernice Johnson, Chairwoman Committee on Science, Space and Technology United States House of Representatives Washington, DC 20515 The Honorable Roger Wicker, Chairman Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation United States Senate Washington, DC 20510 The Honorable Lamar Alexander, Chairman Committee on Health, Education, Labor & Pensions United States Senate Washington, DC 20510 Headquarters: 65-1120 Mamalahoa Highway, Kamuela, HI 96743 Phone (808) 885-7887 l Fax (808) 885-4464 Dear Dr. Córdova, Mr. Bridenstine, Secretary Perry, Chairwoman Johnson, Chairman Wicker, and Chairman Alexander: I am pleased to transmit to you the annual report of the Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee for 2018. As you are aware, this year’s report was delayed due to the partial government shutdown early in 2019. The Committee thanks you for your patience, and apologizes for the delay in sending the report. The Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee was established under the National Science Foundation Authorization Act of 2002 Public Law 107-368 to: (1) assess, and make recommendations regarding, the coordination of astronomy and astrophysics programs of the Foundation
    [Show full text]
  • Binocular Universe: Let's Play Hydra and Seek
    Binocular Universe: Let's Play Hydra and Seek April 2013 Phil Harrington f the 88 constellations scattered across the sky, none spans so great a length as Hydra, the Water Serpent. Westernmost Hydra, lying just east of Canis OMinor and winter's Milky Way, consists of a four-star trapezoid marking one of the serpent's seven heads. The serpent’s long, slithering body then winds its way eastward across our southern spring sky to end near Libra, Scorpius, and the gateway to the summer Milky Way. Above: Spring star map from Star Watch by Phil Harrington. Above: Finder chart for this month's Binocular Universe. Chart adapted from Touring the Universe through Binoculars Atlas (TUBA), www.philharrington.net/tuba.htm While its stars are faint, and at times rather hard to follow, the great length of Hydra contains nearly every type of deep-sky object there is. This month, we are going to seek out a few hidden targets that are often missed by observers. We begin our visit at Hydra’s brightest star, Alphard [Alpha (α) Hydrae]. Even though the stars in Hydra are quite faint, Alphard is surprisingly easy to identify. Draw a line from Megrez [Delta (δ) Ursae Majoris] through Phecda [Gamma (γ) Ursae Majoris] in the Bowl of the Big Dipper, and extend it southward to Regulus in Leo. But, keep going until you arrive at another star, a bit fainter than Regulus, but still fairly bright. That's Alphard. Its name translates from the Arabic "the solitary one," which seems appropriate given the barren surroundings.
    [Show full text]