Vesicular-Arbuscular Mycorrkizal Inoculation of Hawaiian Plants: a Conservation Technique for Endangered Tropical Species1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Vesicular-Arbuscular Mycorrkizal Inoculation of Hawaiian Plants: a Conservation Technique for Endangered Tropical Species1 Pacific Science (1995), vol. 49, no. 2: 181-191 © 1995 by University of Hawai'i Press. All rights reserved Vesicular-arbuscular Mycorrkizal Inoculation of Hawaiian Plants: A Conservation Technique for Endangered Tropical Species1 R. E. KOSKE AND J. N. GEMMA 2 ABSTRACT: Forty species of plants (including 28 species endemic to the Ha­ waiian Islands) were evaluated in the greenhouse for their response to inocula­ tion with the vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices Schenck & Smith. Seedlings, cuttings, and established plants were inoculated. Several kinds of growth media were used. Increased growth and survival most frequently occurred when plants were grown in a gravel or fine sand medium that included calcined clay (up to 50% by volume) or sphagnum peat (up to 20%). Significant increases in height, weight, leaf number and size, and survival were noted in 10 of 14 species of seedlings grown in media in which peat con­ tent was 20% or less. Mycorrhizae were only rarely present in the non­ inoculated plants except for plants grown from cuttings. The latter routinely formed mycorrhizae in the absence of added inoculum. Addition of mycor­ rhizal fungi to potting mixes appears to have value as a conservation technique for some plants that are difficult to propagate. NUMEROUS GREENHOUSE STUDIES have shown 1985, Gagne 1988, Smith 1989, Stone 1989). the benefits of inoculation with vesicular­ Conservation of many Hawaiian species has arbuscular mycorrhizal (VAM) fungi to the been handicapped by our inability to cultivate growth of a wide variety of plant species species in the greenhouse. When plant species (Harley and Smith 1983). Agronomic crops can be established and temporarily main­ have received the most attention, but rela­ tained in a botanical garden, additional time tively few horticultural and wild species have is gained for the protection or acquisition of been tested for mycorrhizal responses (e.g., sites in which the plants can later be out­ Linderman 1978, 1981, Biermann and Lin­ planted (Theobald 1989). derman 1983a,b). Hawaiian species are notoriously difficult In the Hawaiian Islands, it is estimated to propagate in the greenhouse (Wooliams that 33% of the flora of ca. 1000 species is 1976). The frequent observations of the plant endangered or threatened (Vitousek et al. propagator, that seedlings "refused to grow 1987, Wagner et al. 1990). The major causes larger than 2", and after 3 months suddenly of this situation are the destruction of hab­ died" (Wooliams 1976: 74), could well be a itats (especially by humans, pigs, and goats), description of the behavior of an obligately damage from introduced pests, and com­ mycotrophic species grown in the absence of petition from alien plant species (Howarth mycorrhizal fungi (e.g., Janos 1980). Previous studies have shown the horti­ cultural benefits to be derived from the ap­ 1 This research was funded in part by a grant from propriate use of VAM in the greenhouse the Hawai'i State Division of Forestry and Wildlife ad­ (Barrows and Roncadori 1977, Linderman ~ste~ed tbrough the Hawaiian Co.nsef\lation Biology 1978, 1981,Johnsonetal.1980,Johnson 1981, Initiative program of The Nature Conservancy of Ha­ Biermann and Linderman 1983a,b), but their wai'i and a Faculty Fellowship from the University of Rhode Island. Manuscript accepted I3 April 1994. use in the propagation of rare and endan­ 2Department of Botany, University of Rhode Island, gered species has been overlooked. Indeed, Kingston, RI 02881. several standard greenhouse practices (e.g., 181 182 PACIFIC SCIENCE, Volume 49, April 1995 starting seeds and cuttings in "sterile" soil or TABLE I soilless mixes, extensive use of fungicides, PLANT SPECIES USED IN INOCULATION EXPERIMENTS and frequent fertilization) have the effect of suppressing or excluding VAM formation SPECIES STATUS' (Biermann and Linderman 1983a, Harley and Smith 1983). In a comment that could apply Agavaceae equally to effects of greenhouse practices on Pleomele aurea (H. Mann) N. E. Brown E Apiaceae VAM fungi, Wooliams (1976: 82) noted that Peucedanum sandwicensis Hillebr. E "Hawaiian plants are very susceptible to Araliaceae damage by ... fungicides and will often die Munroidendron racemosum (c. Forbes) more rapidly through their use than without! Sherif E The same is true to a lesser extent with Tetraplasandra hawaiensis A. Gray E Asteraceae fertilizers. " Dubautia scabra (DC) D. Keck E The consistent occurrence of mycorrhizae Remya kauaiensis Hillebr. E in Hawaiian plants collected from a variety Verbesina encelioides (Cav.) Benth. & Hook. I of habitats suggested that ca. 90% of native Wilkesia gymnoxiphium A. Gray E Hawaiian angiosperms are obligate myco­ Convolvu1aceae Ipomoea pes-caprae (L.) R. Br. subsp. trophs (i.e., dependent upon the association) brasiliensis (L.) Ooststr. (Koske et al. 1992). However, VAM were Euphorbiaceae essentially absent from > 100 potted plants Antidesma pulvinatum Hillebr. E grown in the greenhouses of the National Chamaescyce remyi var. remyi (A. Gray ex Boiss.) Croizat & Degener E Tropical Botanical Garden (NTBG), Kaua'i, Fabaceae Hawai'i (unpubl. obs.), where standard Acacia koa A. Gray E greenhouse methods were in practice (e.g., Caesalpinia kavaiensis H. Mann E soilless mixes, frequent fertilization). The Erythrina berteroana Urban G discrepancy between the mycorrhizal status Erythrina sandwicensis Degener E Sesbania tomentosa Hook. & Amott E of Hawaiian plants thriving in the field and Sophora chrysophylla (Salisb.) Seem. E those barely surviving in the greenhouse led Scaevola gaudichaudiana Cham. E us to investigate the effect of VAM on the Scaevola sericea Yah! I growth of Hawaiian plants. If plants were Larniaceae Plectranthus parviflorus Willd. found to respond to VAM, an important step Lythraceae toward conservation of Hawaiian and other Lythrum maritimum Kunth I tropical species would be made. Malvaceae Abutilon eremitopetalum Caurn E Abutilon menziesii Seem. E MATERIALS AND METHODS Gossypium tomentosum Nutt. ex Seem. E Hedyotis sp. E A variety of experiments was conducted Hibiscadelphus hualalaiensis Rock E using seedlings, cuttings, and established Hibiscus clayi Degener & I. Degener E plants that had been growing in the green­ Hibiscus waimeae subsp. waimeae A. Heller E Kokia kauaiensis (Rock) Degener & Duvel E house (Table 1). Of the 40 species of plants Sidafallax Walp. I tested, 28 were endemic to the Hawaiian Myrtaceae Islands. A few species of non-Hawaiian, Metrosideros polymorpha Gaud. E tropical plants that were in the greenhouse Pittosporaceae also were included in the study. Where possi­ Pittosporum kauaiense Hillebr. E Primulaceae ble, sampling at the end of the experiment Lysimachia glutinosa Rock E was nondestructive, allowing the plants to be Rharnnaceae outplante_d at _a later date. _ Colubrina oppositifolia Brongn. ex H. Mann E Experiments were performed at NTBG RubIaceae Bobea elatior Gaud. E in a screened greenhouse between May 1989 Gardenia gordonii Baker G and June 1990 and at the University of Gardenia remyi H. Mann E 'W¥ijiM .. Mycorrhizal Inoculation of Hawaiian Plants-KosKE AND GEMMA 183 TABLE I (continued) plants (10 inoculated, 10 control). However, because of the scarcity of some species or of SPECIES STATUS' viable seed, fewer plants had to be used for some experiments. Data were analyzed using Sapindaceae Dodonaea viscosa Jacq. independent t tests (two-tailed), and signifi­ Solanaceae cance was assigned at P < 0.05. Differences Lycium sandwicense A. Gray in survival of plants were analyzed using the Verbenaceae adjusted chi-square test. Vitex rotundifolia L. fil. An index ("MjNM") to standardize 'E, endemic in Hawaiian Islands; I, indigenous to Hawaiian growth response was calculated by dividing Islands; G, greenhouse specimens, not native or naturalized in the average size of the inoculated (M) plants Hawai'i. by the average size of the uninoculated (NM) plants. Angiosperm systematics and nomenclature Rhode Island (URI) in glass-enclos~d, heated are those of Wagner et al. (1990). Endemic greenhouses between July 1990 and January species are those that occur naturally only in 1992. Daytime temperatures at URI were the Hawaiian Islands, and indigenous species 25-35°C (average 27°C) and nighttime tem­ are those that occur naturally in Hawai'i and peratures were 16-25°C (average 24°C). Ex­ elsewhere. periments performed before December 1990 at URI were carried out in a greenhouse Inoculation ofSeedlings without supplemental light. After that date, all plants (continuing experiments and new All experiments were performed at URI. experiments) received 16 hr of light per day Most experiments were performed in a gravel­ of sunlight supplemented with high-pressure calcined clay mix or a peat-calcined clay mix. sodium vapor lamps giving an intensity at the Seeds were germinated in the greenhouse in leaf surface of 350-1375 J.LEinjm 2 jsec. trays of a sphagnum peat: perlite mix (4: 1). Several types of growth media were used. Seedlings (two- to four-leaf stage) were se­ In all mixes listed below, ratios of ingredients lected for uniform size and vigor, sorted into are given on a volume basis. Based on results two groups (inoculated and control), and from the first part of our studies, the compo­ transplanted to containers filled with the ex­ sition of the media and growth conditions perimental mix. Experiments in 1989 were were varied during the investigation. carried out in plastic pots 10 cm square filled At the completion of each experiment, all with a 4: 1 mix of Pro-Mix BX: Oil Dri. plants were measured (typically, the dry Pro-Mix BX (premier Brands, Stamford, CT weight or height of shoots, although other 06902) is a peat-based mix (sphagnum peat, parameters sometimes were used), and roots vermiculite, and perlite), pH 5.5-6.2, con­ of 50-100% of the control and inoculated taining sufficient added macro- and micro­ plants in each experiment usually were nutrients for initial establishment of seed­ collected, cleared, and stained (Koske and lings. Oil Dri (Oil Dri Corp., Chicago, IL Gemma 1989).
Recommended publications
  • Pu'u Wa'awa'a Biological Assessment
    PU‘U WA‘AWA‘A BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT PU‘U WA‘AWA‘A, NORTH KONA, HAWAII Prepared by: Jon G. Giffin Forestry & Wildlife Manager August 2003 STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF FORESTRY AND WILDLIFE TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE ................................................................................................................................. i TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................. ii GENERAL SETTING...................................................................................................................1 Introduction..........................................................................................................................1 Land Use Practices...............................................................................................................1 Geology..................................................................................................................................3 Lava Flows............................................................................................................................5 Lava Tubes ...........................................................................................................................5 Cinder Cones ........................................................................................................................7 Soils .......................................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Rings in a Native Hawaiian Tree, Sophora Chrysophylla, on Maunakea
    TITLE: Annual rings in a native Hawaiian tree, Sophora chrysophylla, on Maunakea, Hawaiʻi RUNNING TITLE: Annual tree-rings in Hawaiʻi KEY WORDS: chronology, crossdating, dendrochronology, māmane, tree age, tree- rings, tropics AUTHORS: Kainana S. Francisco1,2, Patrick J. Hart1,3, Jinbao Li4, Edward R. Cook5, Patrick J. Baker6 INSTITUTIONS: 1Tropical Conservation Biology and Environmental Science, University of Hawaiʻi at Hilo, 200 West Kāwili Street, Hilo, Hawaiʻi, 96720, U.S.A. 2USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Institute of Pacific Islands Forestry, 60 Nowelo Street, Hilo, Hawaiʻi, 96720, U.S.A. 3Biology Department, University of Hawaiʻi at Hilo, 200 West Kāwili Street, Hilo, Hawaiʻi, 96720, U.S.A. 4Department of Geography, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong 5Tree-Ring Lab, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, 61 Route 9W – PO Box 1000, Palisades, New York, 10964, U.S.A. 6Department of Forest and Ecosystem Science, University of Melbourne, Richmond, Victoria 3121, Australia CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Kainana S. Francisco, email: [email protected] ABSTRACT Annual rings are not commonly produced in tropical trees because they grow in a relatively aseasonal environment. However, in the subalpine zones of Hawaiʻi’s highest volcanoes, there is often strong seasonal variability in temperature and rainfall. Using classical dendrochronological methods, annual growth rings were shown to occur in Sophora chrysophylla, commonly called māmane, a native tree species on Maunakea, Hawaiʻi. Sampling occurred at three sites on various facing slopes of Maunakea – Puʻulāʻau (west), Pōhakuloa (south), and Puʻumali (north). Chronologies established from nearby non-native, live conifer trees were used to verify the dates from a total of 52 series from 22 S.
    [Show full text]
  • Ka Pilina Poina 'Ole Connections Not Forgotten Field Guide 2018
    Ka Pilina Poina ‘Ole “Connections Not Forgotten” Species of the Dryland Forest Field Learning Guide Ka‘ūpūlehu Dryland Forest Preserve Kalaemanō Cultural Center La‘i‘Ōpua Dryland Preserve Pālamanui Dry Forest Preserve Endemic Mamane (Sophora chrysophylla) Botanical Names: Sophora chrysophylla, Edwardsia chrysophylla, Edwardsia unifoliata, Sophora grisea, Sophora lanaiensis, Sophora unifoliata Common Names: Mamane, Mamani Family: Fabaceae Potential or Traditional Uses: Lei (Flower or Seed), Wood Description: Mamane is a large shrub or medium sized‐tree up to 50 feet tall. The branches are golden brown with ridges running along them. Each leaf consists of 6 to 10 pairs of oval leaflets. The light green leaflets range in size from 3/8 to 2 inches long and 1/4 to 1 inch wide. The pea‐like yellow flowers form loose bunches at the bases of leaves or the ends of branches. Flowering occurs in winter and spring. Habitat and Geographic Range: Mamane is an endemic species found scattered throughout dry shrubland and dry to moist forests; it is also occasionally found in wet forests. It is the most common plant in the subalpine areas of East Maui and Hawai'i Island. It grows at elevations ranging from 1,400 to over 10,000 feet and is found on all the main Hawaiian islands except Ni'ihau and Kaho'olawe. Endangered, Endemic Uhiuhi (Caesalpinia kavaiensis) Botanical Names: Caesalpinia kavaiensis, Mezoneuron kavaiense Common Names: Uhiuhi, Kawa'u, Kea Family: Fabaceae Potential or Traditional Uses: Lei (Flower or Seed), Wood Description: Uhiuhi is a shrub or small tree ranging in height from 12 to over 30 feet.
    [Show full text]
  • A Landscape-Based Assessment of Climate Change Vulnerability for All Native Hawaiian Plants
    Technical Report HCSU-044 A LANDscape-bASED ASSESSMENT OF CLIMatE CHANGE VULNEraBILITY FOR ALL NatIVE HAWAIIAN PLANts Lucas Fortini1,2, Jonathan Price3, James Jacobi2, Adam Vorsino4, Jeff Burgett1,4, Kevin Brinck5, Fred Amidon4, Steve Miller4, Sam `Ohukani`ohi`a Gon III6, Gregory Koob7, and Eben Paxton2 1 Pacific Islands Climate Change Cooperative, Honolulu, HI 96813 2 U.S. Geological Survey, Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center, Hawaii National Park, HI 96718 3 Department of Geography & Environmental Studies, University of Hawai‘i at Hilo, Hilo, HI 96720 4 U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service —Ecological Services, Division of Climate Change and Strategic Habitat Management, Honolulu, HI 96850 5 Hawai‘i Cooperative Studies Unit, Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center, Hawai‘i National Park, HI 96718 6 The Nature Conservancy, Hawai‘i Chapter, Honolulu, HI 96817 7 USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, Hawaii/Pacific Islands Area State Office, Honolulu, HI 96850 Hawai‘i Cooperative Studies Unit University of Hawai‘i at Hilo 200 W. Kawili St. Hilo, HI 96720 (808) 933-0706 November 2013 This product was prepared under Cooperative Agreement CAG09AC00070 for the Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center of the U.S. Geological Survey. Technical Report HCSU-044 A LANDSCAPE-BASED ASSESSMENT OF CLIMATE CHANGE VULNERABILITY FOR ALL NATIVE HAWAIIAN PLANTS LUCAS FORTINI1,2, JONATHAN PRICE3, JAMES JACOBI2, ADAM VORSINO4, JEFF BURGETT1,4, KEVIN BRINCK5, FRED AMIDON4, STEVE MILLER4, SAM ʽOHUKANIʽOHIʽA GON III 6, GREGORY KOOB7, AND EBEN PAXTON2 1 Pacific Islands Climate Change Cooperative, Honolulu, HI 96813 2 U.S. Geological Survey, Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center, Hawaiʽi National Park, HI 96718 3 Department of Geography & Environmental Studies, University of Hawaiʽi at Hilo, Hilo, HI 96720 4 U.
    [Show full text]
  • List 01 Hawaiian Names 01 Plants
    V\.{). 3 v BOTANICAL BULLETIN NO.2 JUNE. 1913 TERRITORY OF HAWAII BOARD OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY List 01 Hawaiian Names 01 Plants BY JOSEPH F. ROCK Consulting Botanist, Board of Agriculture and Forestry HONOLULU: HAWAIIAN GAZETTE CO., LTD. 1913 ALPHABETICAL LIST OF HAWAIIAN NAMES OF PLANTS. The following list of Hawaiian plant-names has been compiled from various sources. Hillebrand in his valuable Flora of the Hawaiian Islands has given many Hawaiian names, especially of the more common species; these are incorporated in this list with a few corrections. Nearly all Hawaiian plant-names found in this list and not in Hillebrand's Flora were secured from Mr. Francis Gay of the Island of Kauai, an old resident in this Terri­ tory and well acquainted with its plants from a layman's stand­ point. It was the writer's privilege to camp with Mr. Gay in the mountains of Kauai collecting botanical material; for almost every species he could give the native name, which he had se­ cured in the early days from old and reliable natives. Mr. Gay had made spatter prints of many of the native plants in a large record book with their names and uses, as well as their symbolic meaning when occurring in mele (songs) or olioli (chants), at­ tached to them. For all this information the writer is indebted mainly to Mr. Francis Gay and also to Mr. Augustus F. Knudsen of the same Island. The writer also secured Hawaiian names from old na­ tives and Kahunas (priests) in the various islands of the group.
    [Show full text]
  • United States of America
    anran Forestry Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations GLOBAL FOREST RESOURCES ASSESSMENT COUNTRY REPORTS NITED TATES OF MERICA U S A FRA2005/040 Rome, 2005 FRA 2005 – Country Report 040 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA The Forest Resources Assessment Programme Sustainably managed forests have multiple environmental and socio-economic functions important at the global, national and local scales, and play a vital part in sustainable development. Reliable and up- to-date information on the state of forest resources - not only on area and area change, but also on such variables as growing stock, wood and non-wood products, carbon, protected areas, use of forests for recreation and other services, biological diversity and forests’ contribution to national economies - is crucial to support decision-making for policies and programmes in forestry and sustainable development at all levels. FAO, at the request of its member countries, regularly monitors the world’s forests and their management and uses through the Forest Resources Assessment Programme. This country report forms part of the Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005 (FRA 2005), which is the most comprehensive assessment to date. More than 800 people have been involved, including 172 national correspondents and their colleagues, an Advisory Group, international experts, FAO staff, consultants and volunteers. Information has been collated from 229 countries and territories for three points in time: 1990, 2000 and 2005. The reporting framework for FRA 2005 is based on the thematic elements of sustainable forest management acknowledged in intergovernmental forest-related fora and includes more than 40 variables related to the extent, condition, uses and values of forest resources.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2009 an Analysis of Possible Risk To
    Project Title An Analysis of Possible Risk to Threatened and Endangered Plant Species Associated with Glyphosate Use in Alfalfa: A County-Level Analysis Authors Thomas Priester, Ph.D. Rick Kemman, M.S. Ashlea Rives Frank, M.Ent. Larry Turner, Ph.D. Bernalyn McGaughey David Howes, Ph.D. Jeffrey Giddings, Ph.D. Stephanie Dressel Data Requirements Pesticide Assessment Guidelines Subdivision E—Hazard Evaluation: Wildlife and Aquatic Organisms Guideline Number 70-1-SS: Special Studies—Effects on Endangered Species Date Completed August 22, 2007 Prepared by Compliance Services International 7501 Bridgeport Way West Lakewood, WA 98499-2423 (253) 473-9007 Sponsor Monsanto Company 800 N. Lindbergh Blvd. Saint Louis, MO 63167 Project Identification Compliance Services International Study 06711 Monsanto Study ID CS-2005-125 RD 1695 Volume 3 of 18 Page 1 of 258 Threatened & Endangered Plant Species Analysis CSI 06711 Glyphosate/Alfalfa Monsanto Study ID CS-2005-125 Page 2 of 258 STATEMENT OF NO DATA CONFIDENTIALITY CLAIMS The text below applies only to use of the data by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) in connection with the provisions of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) No claim of confidentiality is made for any information contained in this study on the basis of its falling within the scope of FIFRA §10(d)(1)(A), (B), or (C). We submit this material to the United States Environmental Protection Agency specifically under the requirements set forth in FIFRA as amended, and consent to the use and disclosure of this material by EPA strictly in accordance with FIFRA. By submitting this material to EPA in accordance with the method and format requirements contained in PR Notice 86-5, we reserve and do not waive any rights involving this material that are or can be claimed by the company notwithstanding this submission to EPA.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey for Alkaloids in Hawaiian Plants, III
    A Survey for Alkaloids in Hawaiian Plants, III PAUL J. SCHEUER, LAURA P. HORIGAN, AND WEBSTER R. HUDGINS! IN CONTINUATION of our systematic survey for METHODS alkaloids in Hawaiian plants2 we have collected The following procedure is the one which is and tested additional plant species on Oahu, recommended by Raffauf (1958). Hawaii, Maui, and Kauai. Of the 71 samples A 20 g. sample of dried plant parts was in the present report, 15 represent species which ground in a Waring blender with the addition had been tested by us previously. These results of some 95 per cent ethanol. The material was are included here since 13 of these samples were then extracted with 150 m!. of boiling ethanol collected at different locations and 2 gave test for 2 hr. The insoluble plant parts were removed results at variance with previous findings. All by suction filtration and the alcoholic filtrate specimens were collected from living plants. was evaporated to dryness on a steam bath un­ In parts I and II of this survey testing for der reduced pressure. The residue was dissolved alkaloids was carried out as described by Webb by stirring with a mixture of 50 ml. ether and phytoc~emical (1949', 1952) in his classical 50 ml. of 5 per cent hydrochloric acid. Part of study of the Australian flora. In folloWIng up the aqueous acidic extract containing the non­ some positive tests as indicated in the survey quaternary alkaloids was tested with Mayer's with actual isolation of alkaloids on a prepara­ reagent. The validity of a positive alkaloid test tive scale, it has been noted by us and by others was confirmed by adding powdered sodium (e.g., Raffauf, 19'58) that extraction and test­ chloride to another portion of the acidic ~xtract.
    [Show full text]
  • Mauna Kea Forest Restoration Project Volunteer Packet
    Fore a st e Re K s t a o n r u a t a i o M n P r o j e c t Mauna Kea Forest Restoration Project Volunteer Packet Packing Checklist At minimum, bring: If staying overnight, also include: q Sturdy boots (ankle q Warm Sleeping Bag (rated 20° or below) supporting) q Sleeping Pad q Long pants q Warm Sweater q T-shirts or long sleeved q Extra clothes shirts for field work q Underwear q Rain jacket and rain pants q Socks q Work gloves q Personal toiletries (shampoo, washcloth, q Sunscreen soap, toothbrush, toothpaste, etc.). q Sunglasses q Towel q Water bottle q Warm sleep clothes, beanie q Lunch q Slippers q Optional: hat, camera q Flashlight/headlamp q Prescription medication SMOKING IS NOT ALLOWED ON MAUNA KEA. q Allergy medication, contact solution, glasses. Fire destroys our precious dry forests. q Food for the trip (and cooler with ice) ALL TRIPS TO MAUNA KEA ARE DRUG AND ALCOHOL FREE. Volunteer Safety Checklist • Fill out and sign your volunteer service forms. Failure to do so will disqualify a person from access to MKFRP restoration areas and the State may not be responsible for the cost of emergency air evacuations, or workman’s compensation. • Bring all required medication(s) with you. If you have any medical conditions, please inform MKFRP staff before the work trip strictly( confidential). • Volunteers with asthma or allergies—especially to bee stings—must bring their medication(s) and a MKRFP staff member must be advised prior to the trip. We are three hours away from any medical assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Palila Loxioides Bailleui
    Forest Birds Palila Loxioides bailleui SPECIES STATUS: Federally Listed as Endangered State Listed as Endangered State Recognized as Endemic NatureServe Heritage Rank G1—Critically Imperiled IUCN Red List Ranking—Critically Endangered Photo: DOFAW Revised Recovery Plan for Hawaiian Forest Birds —USFWS 2006 Critical Habitat Designated 1977 SPECIES INFORMATION: The palila is a finch-billed Hawaiian honeycreeper (Family: Fringillidae) whose life history and survival is linked to māmane (Sophora chrysophylla), an endemic dry-forest tree in the legume family. Males and females are similar, with a yellow head and breast, greenish wings and tail, a gray back, and white underparts. Males have a black mask, and females have less yellow on the back of their heads and a gray mask. Approximately 90 percent of the palila’s diet consists of immature māmane seeds; the remainder consists of māmane flowers, buds, leaves, and naio (Myoporum sandwicense) berries. Caterpillars and other insects comprise the diet of nestlings, but also are eaten by adults. Māmane seeds have been found to contain high levels of toxic alkaloids, and palila use particular trees for foraging, suggesting that levels of alkaloids may vary among trees. Individuals will move limited distances in response to the availability of māmane seeds. Palila form long-term pair bonds, and males perform low advertisement flights, sing, chase females, and engage in courtship feeding prior to breeding. Females build nests, usually in māmane trees, and males defend a small territory around the nest tree. Females mostly incubate eggs, brood nestlings and feed young with food delivered by male. First-year males sometimes help a pair by defending the nest and feeding the female and nestlings.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 1996 / Proposed Rules
    7596 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 1996 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR appointment in the Regional Offices SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: listed below. Fish and Wildlife Service Information relating to particular taxa Background in this notice may be obtained from the The Endangered Species Act (Act) of 50 CFR Part 17 Service's Endangered Species 1973, as amended, (16 U.S.C. 1531 et Coordinator in the lead Regional Office seq.) requires the Service to identify Endangered and Threatened Wildlife identified for each taxon and listed species of wildlife and plants that are and Plants; Review of Plant and below: endangered or threatened, based on the Animal Taxa That Are Candidates for Region 1. California, Commonwealth best available scientific and commercial Listing as Endangered or Threatened of the Northern Mariana Islands, information. As part of the program to Species Hawaii, Idaho, Nevada, Oregon, Pacific accomplish this, the Service has AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Territories of the United States, and maintained a list of species regarded as Interior. Washington. candidates for listing. The Service maintains this list for a variety of ACTION: Notice of review. Regional Director (TE), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Eastside Federal reasons, includingÐto provide advance SUMMARY: In this notice the Fish and Complex, 911 N.E. 11th Avenue, knowledge of potential listings that Wildlife Service (Service) presents an Portland, Oregon 97232±4181 (503± could affect decisions of environmental updated list of plant and animal taxa 231±6131). planners and developers; to solicit input native to the United States that are Region 2.
    [Show full text]
  • *Wagner Et Al. --Intro
    NUMBER 60, 58 pages 15 September 1999 BISHOP MUSEUM OCCASIONAL PAPERS HAWAIIAN VASCULAR PLANTS AT RISK: 1999 WARREN L. WAGNER, MARIE M. BRUEGMANN, DERRAL M. HERBST, AND JOEL Q.C. LAU BISHOP MUSEUM PRESS HONOLULU Printed on recycled paper Cover illustration: Lobelia gloria-montis Rock, an endemic lobeliad from Maui. [From Wagner et al., 1990, Manual of flowering plants of Hawai‘i, pl. 57.] A SPECIAL PUBLICATION OF THE RECORDS OF THE HAWAII BIOLOGICAL SURVEY FOR 1998 Research publications of Bishop Museum are issued irregularly in the RESEARCH following active series: • Bishop Museum Occasional Papers. A series of short papers PUBLICATIONS OF describing original research in the natural and cultural sciences. Publications containing larger, monographic works are issued in BISHOP MUSEUM four areas: • Bishop Museum Bulletins in Anthropology • Bishop Museum Bulletins in Botany • Bishop Museum Bulletins in Entomology • Bishop Museum Bulletins in Zoology Numbering by volume of Occasional Papers ceased with volume 31. Each Occasional Paper now has its own individual number starting with Number 32. Each paper is separately paginated. The Museum also publishes Bishop Museum Technical Reports, a series containing information relative to scholarly research and collections activities. Issue is authorized by the Museum’s Scientific Publications Committee, but manuscripts do not necessarily receive peer review and are not intended as formal publications. Institutions and individuals may subscribe to any of the above or pur- chase separate publications from Bishop Museum Press, 1525 Bernice Street, Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817-0916, USA. Phone: (808) 848-4135; fax: (808) 841-8968; email: [email protected]. Institutional libraries interested in exchanging publications should write to: Library Exchange Program, Bishop Museum Library, 1525 Bernice Street, Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817-0916, USA; fax: (808) 848-4133; email: [email protected].
    [Show full text]