DOCSLIB.ORG

History Chapter 3 : the Delhi Sultanate A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
History Chapter 3 : the Delhi Sultanate A History Chapter 3 : The Delhi Sultanate A. Tick the correct option. 1. The Delhi Sultanate ruled from 1206 CE to A. 1256 CE B. 1526CE C. 1414 CE D. 1514 CE 2. The Slave dynasty was founded by A. Qutb-ud-din-Aibak B. Muhammad Ghori c. Iltutmish D. Balban 3. Muhammad- bin Tughluq introduced token currency to overcome the shortage of A. Gold B. Silver c. Brass D. Copper 4. The Mongol invader who was the ruler of Samarkand was A. Timur B. Chenghiz Khan c. Khizr Khan D. Iltutmish 5. The forty powerful nobles during the Slave dynasty were A. Ulema B. Ariz-i-Mumalik C. Iqtadars D. Chihalgani 6. The Noble who judged the religious matters was called A. Wazir B. Qazi-ul-Mumalik C. Ariz- i- Mumalik D. Waqil-i-Dar B. State True or False. 1. The Khalji dynasty was founded by Muhammad- bin-Tughluq. (False) 2. Balban wanted the people to believe that the sultan was the representative of God on earth. (True) 3. Muhammad- bin Tughluq’s new capital was called Tughlaqabad. (False) 4. Ala-ud-din Khalji was very fond of lavish parties. (False) 5. Raziya Sultan succeeded Iltutmish to the throne of the Sultanate. (True) C. Match the following. Column A column N A. Ala-ud-din Khalji i. Sijdah ( c) B. Mamluk dynasty ii. Daulatabad ( d) C. Balban iii. Land Tax ( e) D. Muhammad -bin Tughluq. iv. Chehra ( a) E. Kharaj v. Iltutmish (b) D. Sequence the events in the correct chronological order, by writing Number in the boxes. 1. First Battle of Panipat (5) 2. Second Battle of Tarain (1) 3. Raziya Sultan’s ascension (2) 4. Disintegration of Khaljis (3) 5. Introduction of token currency (4) E. Short- answer questions. 1. Name two Persian customs introduced by Balban. Why were the people against these? Ans. Persian customs introduced by Balban were sijdah and Paibos . The common people were against these practices because these customs were used in the worship of God alone. 2. Why was Raziya Sultan unable to rule effectively? Ans.Raziya’s reign was brief and stormy. She was unable to rule effectively because she was a woman and the nobles did not wish to take orders from a woman. 3. Who introduced the system of dagh and chehra and why? Ans. The system of dagh and chehra were introduced by Ala – ud-din Khalji. Because he started the system of branding horses in the army to distinguish among the good and inferior horses and prevent their substitution. A prototype of the modern identity card was also kept for each soldier. 4. What monuments were commissioned during the reign of Qutb-ud-din Aibak? Ans. Qutub Minar and the Quwwatul Islam Mosque were commissioned during the reign of Qutb-ud-din Aibak. 5. Who was Timur ? Ans. Timur was a Mongol ruler, who claimed to be a descendent of Chenghiz Khan. 6. What were Sikander Lodi’s contributions for the development of the Lodi dynasty? Ans. Sikander Lodi annexed the regions of Jaunpur and Bihar and signed a friendship treaty with the ruler of Bengal. He founded the city of Agra and made it his capital. 7. Why is the First Battle of Panipat important in the history of medieval India? Ans. The First Battle of Panipat is very important in the history because it marks the beginning of Mughal’s period in India. In this battle Ibrahim Lodi was defeated by the First Mughal ruler Babur. F. Long-answer questions. 1. Describe the reign of the Slave dynasty and its importance to the Delhi Sultanate. Ans. After the death of Muhammad Ghori, Delhi was given to Qutb-ud-din Aibak who founded the Slave dynasty. He was a generous and kind -hearted ruler. Qutb-ud-din Aibak was succeeded by his son -in-law Iltutmish, who is recognized by historians as the first true ruler of the Delhi Sultanate. He expanded his territories by defeating the Rajput rulers of Ranthambore, Mandor, jalore, Bayana, and Thangir and even annexed parts of Bengal and Bihar. Balban was the most powerful ruler of the Slave dynasty. He had been a very important noble since Iltutmish’s reign and was the advisor of Nasir-ud-din Mahmud. 2. write a short note on Ala-ud-din Khalji as one of the most powerful ruler of the Sultanate Ans. Ala-ud-din Khalji was the most famous ruler of the Delhi Sultanate. He was a brilliant general and a clever administrator and was successful in expanding the territories of the kingdom considerably. His first campaign was against Gujarat. Later on he seized the kingdoms of Malwa, Rantjambore , Chittor and Jalore. Ala-ud-din invaded Devagiri and the Deccan in a campaign led by his trusted general, Malik Kafur. He introduced a market control policy whereby he lowered the prices of all essential items, such as food grains, sugar and cloth. 3. Describe the three failed policies of Muhammad- bin Tughluq. Ans. The three failed policies of Muhammad- bin Tughluq were Increased taxes: To increase revenue, he had increase taxes in the Doab region. People revolted against the Sultan. Shifting of the capital: His second failed experiment was the shifting of the capital from Delhi to Devagiri, which he renamed as Daulatabad. But he soon realized that it was impossible to look after the northwest frontiers from this safe central location. Introduction of a token currency: Muhammad bin Tughluq’s third failed policy was the introduction of the token currency due to shortage of silver currency. The design of this token currency was so simple, that people began to forge it in large quantities. 4. Describe the iqta system of the Delhi Sultanate. Ans. During Sultanate period, nobles were given land grants known as iqtas and the nobles who received them were called iqtadars. They collected taxes from the farmers living in their iqtas and maintained their home and families and the soldiers under them. In return for the land, the iqtadars supplied soldiers to the sultan whenever they were required. 5. How did Timur’s invasion affect the rule of the Tughluq s? Ans. The Mongol ruler Timur ruled over a large empire in central Asia. He claimed to be a descendent of Chenghiz Khan. He invaded India and plundered Delhi. The last Tughluq sultan Nadir ud din could not fight him. Timur’s army brutally massacred thousands of people and with the loot, he decorated his kingdom, Samarkand. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Medieval History
    CONTENTS MEDIEVAL HISTORY 1. MAJOR DYNASTIES (EARLY ....... 01-22 2. EARLY MUSLIM INVASIONS ........23-26 MEDIEVAL INDIA 750-1200 AD) 2.1 Early Muslim Invasions ..................24 1.1 Major Dynasties of North ...............02 The Arab Conquest of Sindh ............... 24 India (750-1200 Ad) Mahmud of Ghazni ............................ 24 Introduction .......................................2 Muhammad Ghori ............................. 25 The Tripartite Struggle ........................2 th th The Pratiharas (8 to 10 Century) ........3 3. THE DELHI SULTANATE ................27-52 th th The Palas (8 to 11 Century) ...............4 (1206-1526 AD) The Rashtrakutas (9th to 10th Century) ....5 The Senas (11th to 12th Century) ............5 3.1 The Delhi Sultanate ......................28 The Rajaputa’s Origin ..........................6 Introduction ..................................... 28 Chandellas ........................................6 Slave/Mamluk Dynasty (Ilbari ............ 28 Chahamanas ......................................7 Turks)(1206-1526 AD) Gahadvalas ........................................8 The Khalji Dynasty (1290-1320 AD) ..... 32 Indian Feudalism ................................9 The Tughlaq Dynasty (1320-1414 AD) .. 34 Administration in Northern India ........ 09 The Sayyid Dynasty ........................... 38 between 8th to 12th Century Lodi Dynasty .................................... 38 Nature of Society .............................. 11 Challenges Faced by the Sultanate ...... 39 Rise
    [Show full text]
  • Qutb Minar: Religion and Power in 13Th-Century India Professor Munis Faruqui (Department of South and Southeast Asian Studies, UC Berkeley)
    The Making of a Modern Myth Qutb Minar: Religion and Power in 13th-Century India Professor Munis Faruqui (Department of South and Southeast Asian Studies, UC Berkeley) I. Introduction India is the world’s largest democracy, and has the world’s second largest population of Muslims. Over the last few decades, deep religious divisions have appeared between the Hindu majority and the Muslim minority, who comprise 12–15 percent of the population. Extremists in either community have stoked violent religious conflict in ways that will be discussed shortly. Most of the violence in recent history has occurred in the form of pogroms. Most of the victims are Muslims. There are at least two critical threads that link contemporary anti-Muslim violence: first, a rising tide of Hindu nationalism. Second, much of the violence has been continuously stoked by rhetoricians’ use of an exaggerated and distorted history of endless conflict between these two groups—especially during the period when Muslim political authorities dominated northern India (c. 1200–1750). According to Hindu nationalists, the experience under the Muslims was oppressive, the Muslim rulers tyrannical, Hindu temples were destroyed, and so on. So the current anti- Muslim pogroms are payback, as the more extreme elements among the Hindu nationalists openly assert: attacking Muslims today is thus justified for what happened 500, 600, or 700 years ago. Like many groups elsewhere in the world, Hindu nationalists invoke history. Irish Republicanism invokes battles that happened in 1690 and so on. Groups in the Balkans are another example: Serbs, Croats, and Bosniacs have their own histories, and the 1389 battle of Kosovo becomes a central rallying cry for Serbian nationalism.
    [Show full text]
  • THE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY in CAIRO School of Humanities And
    1 THE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY IN CAIRO School of Humanities and Social Sciences Department of Arab and Islamic Civilizations Islamic Art and Architecture A thesis on the subject of Revival of Mamluk Architecture in the 19th & 20th centuries by Laila Kamal Marei under the supervision of Dr. Bernard O’Kane 2 Dedications and Acknowledgments I would like to dedicate this thesis for my late father; I hope I am making you proud. I am sure you would have enjoyed this field of study as much as I do. I would also like to dedicate this for my mother, whose endless support allowed me to pursue a field of study that I love. Thank you for listening to my complains and proofreads from day one. Thank you for your patience, understanding and endless love. I am forever, indebted to you. I would like to thank my family and friends whose interest in the field and questions pushed me to find out more. Aziz, my brother, thank you for your questions and criticism, they only pushed me to be better at something I love to do. Zeina, we will explore this world of architecture together some day, thank you for listening and asking questions that only pushed me forward I love you. Alya’a and the Friday morning tours, best mornings of my adult life. Iman, thank you for listening to me ranting and complaining when I thought I’d never finish, thank you for pushing me. Salma, with me every step of the way, thank you for encouraging me always. Adham abu-elenin, thank you for your time and photography.
    [Show full text]
  • Delhi Sultanate
    DELHI SULTANATE The period from 1206 to 1526 in India history is known as Sultanate period. Slave Dynasty In 1206 Qutubuddin Aibak made India free of Ghazni’s control. Rulers who ruled over India and conquered new territories during the period 1206-1290 AD. are known as belonging to Slave dynasty. Qutubuddin Aibak He came from the region of Turkistan and he was a slave of Mohammad Ghori. He ruled as a Sultan from 1206 to 1210. While playing Polo, he fell from the horse and died in 1210. Aram Shah After Aibak’s death, his son Aram Shah was enthroned at Lahore. In the conflict between Iltutmish and Aram Shah, Iltutmish was victorious. Iltutmish He was slave of Aibak. He belonged to the Ilbari Turk clan of Turkistan. In 1211 Iltutmish occupied the throne of Delhi after killing Aram Shah and successfully ruled upto 1236. Construction of Qutub Minar He completed the unfinished construction of Qutub Minar, which was started by Qutubuddin Aibak. He built the Dhai Din ka Jhopra at Ajmer. Razia Sultan She was the first lady Sultan who ruled for three years, six months and six days. From 1236 to 1240. She appointed Jamaluddin Yakut as highest officer of cavalry. In 1240, the feudal lord (Subedar) of Bhatinda, Ikhtiyaruddin nobles he imprisoned Razia and killed Yakut. To counter her enemies Razia married Altunia and once again attempted to regain power. On 13th October, 1240, near Kaithal when Razia and Altunia were resting under a tree, some dacoits killed them. Balban Set on the throne of Delhi in 1266 and he adopted the name of Ghiyasuddin Balban.
    [Show full text]
  • INFORMATION to USERS the Most Advanced Technology Has Been Used to Photo­ Graph and Reproduce This Manuscript from the Microfilm Master
    INFORMATION TO USERS The most advanced technology has been used to photo­ graph and reproduce this manuscript from the microfilm master. UMI films the original text directly from the copy submitted. Thus, some dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from a computer printer. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyrighted material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are re­ produced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each oversize page is available as one exposure on a standard 35 mm slide or as a 17" x 23" black and white photographic print for an additional charge. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. 35 mm slides or 6" X 9" black and w h itephotographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. Accessing the World'sUMI Information since 1938 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA Order Number 8824569 The architecture of Firuz Shah Tughluq McKibben, William Jeffrey, Ph.D. The Ohio State University, 1988 Copyright ©1988 by McKibben, William Jeflfrey. All rights reserved. UMI 300 N. Zeeb Rd. Ann Arbor, MI 48106 PLEASE NOTE: In all cases this material has been filmed in the best possible way from the available copy.
    [Show full text]
  • Sayyid Dynasty
    SAYYID DYNASTY The Sayyid dynasty was the fourth dynasty of the Delhi Sultanate, with four rulers ruling from 1414 to 1451. Founded by Khizr Khan, a former governor of Multan, they succeeded the Tughlaq dynasty and ruled the sultanate until they were displaced by the Lodi dynasty. Khizr Khan (1414- 1421 A.D.) He was the founder of Sayyid Dynasty He did not swear any royal title. He was the Governor of Multan. He took advantage of the disordered situation in India after Timur’s invasion. In 1414 A.D. he occupied the throne of Delhi. He brought parts of Surat, Dilapur, and Punjab under his control. But he lost Bengal, Deccan, Gujarat, Jaunpur, Khandesh and Malwa. In 1421 he died. Mubarak Shah, Khizr Khan’s son succeeded him. Mubarak Shah (1421-1434 A.D.) He was the son of Khizr Khan who got Khutba read on his name and issued his own coins. He did not accept the suzerainty of any foreign power. He was the ablest ruler of the dynasty. He subdued the rebellion at Bhatinda and Daob and the revolt by Khokhars Chief Jasrat. He patronised Vahiya Bin Ahmad Sarhind, author of Tarikh-i-Mubarak Shahi. Mubarak Shah was succeeded by two incompetent rulers, Muhammad Shah (AD 1434- 1445) and Alauddin Alam Shah (AD 1445-1450). Most of the provincial kingdoms declared their independence. Hence, Alam Shah surrendered the throne and retired in an inglorious manner to Baduan. Finally Bahlol Lodhi captured the throne of Delhi with the support of Wazir Khan. Muhammad Shah (1434-1445 A.D.) He defeated the ruler of Malwa with the help of Bahlul Lodi, the Governor of Lahore.
    [Show full text]
  • Islamic Civilisation in the Mediterranean Nicosia, I-4 December 2010
    IRCICA RESEARCH CENTRE FOR ISLAM lC HISTORY, ART AND CULTURE Proceedings of the International Conference on Islamic Civilisation in the Mediterranean Nicosia, ı-4 December 2010 Akdeniz'de İslam Medeniyeti Milletlerarası Konferans Tebliğleri Lefkoşa, ı -4 Aralık 20 ı o Türkiye Dlyanet Vakfı .. \ . Islam Araştımıaları Met'k.ezi Kü'rtlphanesi Tas. No: İstanbul2013 The Blazon Western lnfluences on Mamluk Art after the Crusades Sumiyo Okumura* In Mamluk art, w e often see rounded or oval shaped ran k/ runuk (emblems, blazons or coats-of-arms), which are decorated with differentkinds ofheraldic symbols. They were use d by Mamluk amirs to identify the passessors and their status in the structure of Mamluk government. Although many important studies have been conducted on this subject, 1 histarical documents do not give much information ab out the origin of Mamluk emblems. There existed many kinds of emblems that indicated occupations including saqi (cup bearer) with the cup (Fig. 1); dawadar (inkwell holder the secretary or officer) with the pen box (Fig. 2); and djamdar (master of the robe keeper of clothes) with the shape of napkin, barfcP (postman, courier) with straight lines, jukandaf3 (çevgandar = holder of polo stick) with a hall and polo stick, and silahdar (swoi:d bearer) was symbolized with the sword (Fig. 3). The Ayyubid Sultan, Melikü's-Salih Najim al-Din Ayyub (r. 1240-1249) bestawed the emblem of a smail dining table, called Honca 1 Han çe, 4 on an amir who was appointed to the position of jashnkir. Jashnkir was the taster of the Sultan's food and drink.
    [Show full text]
  • Medieval India TNPSC GROUP – I & II
    VETRII IAS STUDY CIRCLE Medieval India TNPSC GROUP – I & II An ISO 9001 : 2015 Institution | Providing Excellence Since 2011 Head Office Old No.52, New No.1, 9th Street, F Block, 1st Avenue Main Road, (Near Istha siddhi Vinayakar Temple), Anna Nagar East – 600102. Phone: 044-2626 5326 | 98844 72636 | 98844 21666 | 98844 32666 Branches SALEM KOVAI No.189/1, Meyanoor Road, Near ARRS Multiplex, No.347, D.S.Complex (3rd floor), (Near Salem New bus Stand), Nehru Street,Near Gandhipuram Opp. Venkateshwara Complex, Salem - 636004. Central Bus Stand, Ramnagar, Kovai - 9 Ph: 0427-2330307 | 95001 22022 Ph: 75021 65390 Educarreerr Location VIVEKANANDHA EDUCATIONA PATRICIAN COLLEGE OF ARTS SREE SARASWATHI INSTITUTIONS FOR WOMEN AND SCIENCE THYAGARAJA COLLEGE Elayampalayam, Tiruchengode - TK 3, Canal Bank Rd, Gandhi Nagar, Palani Road, Thippampatti, Namakkal District - 637 205. Opp. to Kotturpuram Railway Station, Pollachi - 642 107 Ph: 04288 - 234670 Adyar, Chennai - 600020. Ph: 73737 66550 | 94432 66008 91 94437 34670 Ph: 044 - 24401362 | 044 - 24426913 90951 66009 www.vetriias.com © VETRII IAS STUDY CIRCLE First Edition – 2015 Second Edition – 2019 Pages : 114 Size : (240 × 180) cm Price : 220/- Published by: VETRII IAS STUDY CIRCLE F Block New No. 1, 9th Street, 1st Avenue main Road, Chinthamani, Anna Nagar (E), Chennai – 102. Phone: 044-2626 5326 | 98844 72636 | 98844 21666 | 98844 32666 www.vetriias.com E-mail: [email protected] / [email protected] / [email protected] Feedback: [email protected] © All rights reserved with the publisher. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the written permission of the publisher, will be responsible for the loss and may be punished for compensation under copyright act.
    [Show full text]
  • Theocracy Metin M. Coşgel Thomas J. Miceli
    Theocracy Metin M. Coşgel University of Connecticut Thomas J. Miceli University of Connecticut Working Paper 2013-29 November 2013 365 Fairfield Way, Unit 1063 Storrs, CT 06269-1063 Phone: (860) 486-3022 Fax: (860) 486-4463 http://www.econ.uconn.edu/ This working paper is indexed on RePEc, http://repec.org THEOCRACY by Metin Coşgel* and Thomas J. Miceli** Abstract: Throughout history, religious and political authorities have had a mysterious attraction to each other. Rulers have established state religions and adopted laws with religious origins, sometimes even claiming to have divine powers. We propose a political economy approach to theocracy, centered on the legitimizing relationship between religious and political authorities. Making standard assumptions about the motivations of these authorities, we identify the factors favoring the emergence of theocracy, such as the organization of the religion market, monotheism vs. polytheism, and strength of the ruler. We use two sets of data to test the implications of the model. We first use a unique data set that includes information on over three hundred polities that have been observed throughout history. We also use recently available cross-country data on the relationship between religious and political authorities to examine these issues in current societies. The results provide strong empirical support for our arguments about why in some states religious and political authorities have maintained independence, while in others they have integrated into a single entity. JEL codes: H10,
    [Show full text]
  • Coins of Delhi Sultanate
    Coins of Delhi Sultanate 5.1 Do you know Description Image Source Once the Delhi sultanate was firmly established in the 13th century, Indian coinage underwent a major change. The ancient pictorial tradition of coinage gave way to the so-called Islamic type of coins which were sans any pictorial motif. Islamic type of coins had inscription written in Arabic script on both the sides and furnished more information than their ancient counter parts. It offers Religious and Secular information The Khalji sultan Alauddin Muhammad Shah (1296-1316 CE), discarded the name of Abbasid Caliph from his coins and called himself Yamin- ul Khilafat (right hand of Caliph). The title was used for the first time by an Indian ruler. He also adopted the title of sikander-us-sani (Second Alexander). This indicates that he was well aware of the importance of Alexander, and wanted to be recognised as the second Alexander. Qutubuddin Mubarak (1316-1320 CE), the successor of Alauddin Khalji is known to have issued coins in gold, silver, billon and copper. He made a remarkable change in his coin inscription as he has not only discarded the name of Abbasid caliph but declared himself as caliph and called himself khalifullah (caliph of Allah) and Khalifah rabil alemin (caliph of the lord of the world). He also adopted the title of sikander uz zaman. Muhammad bin Tughluq (1325-1351 CE) introduced token currency in bronze. It weighed around 10 gm. and ruler has asked to accept this bronze tanka at the rate of silver tanka current in the market.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Component-I (A) – Personal Details
    Component-I (A) – Personal details: 1 Component-I (B) – Description of module: Subject Name Indian Culture Paper Name Outlines of Indian History Module Name/Title The slave dynasty (1206-1290) Module Id I C/ OIH/ 20 Knowledge in Medieval Indian History and Delhi Pre-requisites Sultanate To know the History of Slave/ Mamluk dynasty Objectives and their role in Delhi sultanate Qutb-ud-din Aibak / Iltutmish/ Razia / Balban / Keywords Slave / Mamluk / Delhi Sultanate E-text (Quadrant-I) 1. Introduction The Sultanate of Delhi, said to have been formally founded by Qutb-ud-din Aibak, one of the Viceroys of Muhammad Ghori. It is known as the Sultanate of Delhi because during the greater part of the Sultanate, its capital was Delhi. The Sultanate of Delhi (1206–1526) had five ruling dynasties viz., 1) The Slave dynasty (1206-1290), 2) The Khilji Dynasty (1290–1320) 3), The Tughlaq Dynasty (1320–1414), 4) The Sayyad Dynasty (1414–1451) and 5) The Lodi dynasty (1451–1526). The first dynasty of the Sultanate has been designated by various historians as ‘The Slave’, ‘The Early Turk’, ‘The Mamluk’ and ‘The Ilbari’ 2. Slave/Mamluk Dynasty 2.1. Qutb-ud-din Aibak (1206 – 1210) Qutb-ud-din Aibak was the founder of the Slave/Mamluk dynasty. He was the Turk of the Aibak tribe. In his childhood he was first purchased by a kind hearted Qazi of Nishapur as Slave. He received education in Islamic theory and swordmanship along with the son of his master. When Qazi died, he was sold by his son to a merchant who took him to Ghazni where he was purchased by Muhammad Ghori.
    [Show full text]
  • 15 the Regions of Sind, Baluchistan, Multan
    ISBN 978-92-3-103467-1 THE REGIONS OF SIND . 15 THE REGIONS OF SIND, BALUCHISTAN, MULTAN AND KASHMIR: THE HISTORICAL, SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC SETTING* N. A. Baloch and A. Q. Rafiqi Contents THE RULERS OF SIND, BALUCHISTAN AND MULTAN (750–1500) ....... 298 The cAbbasid period and the Fatimid interlude (mid-eighth to the end of the tenth century) ...................................... 298 The Period of the Ghaznavid and Ghurid Sultanates (eleventh and twelfth centuries) . 301 The era of the local independent states ......................... 304 KASHMIR UNDER THE SULTANS OF THE SHAH¯ MIR¯ DYNASTY ....... 310 * See Map 4, 5 and 7, pp. 430–1, 432–3, 437. 297 ISBN 978-92-3-103467-1 The cAbbasid period Part One THE RULERS OF SIND, BALUCHISTAN AND MULTAN (750–1500) (N. A. Baloch) From 750 to 1500, three phases are discernible in the political history of these regions. During the first phase, from the mid-eighth until the end of the tenth century, Sind, Baluchis- tan and Multan – with the exception of the interlude of pro-Fatimid ascendency in Mul- tan during the last quarter of the tenth century – all remained politically linked with the cAbbasid caliphate of Baghdad. (Kashmir was ruled, from the eighth century onwards, by the local, independent, originally non-Muslim dynasties, which had increasing political contacts with the Muslim rulers of Sind and Khurasan.) During the second phase – the eleventh and twelfth centuries – all these regions came within the sphere of influence of the powers based in Ghazna and Ghur. During the third phase –from the thirteenth to the early sixteenth century – they partly became dominions of the Sultanate of Delhi, which was in itself an extension into the subcontinent of the Central Asian power base.
    [Show full text]