DOCSLIB.ORG

Raport Privind Impactul Asupra Mediului

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Raport Privind Impactul Asupra Mediului RAPORT PRIVIND IMPACTUL ASUPRA MEDIULUI „Reconectare și restaurare luncă inundabilă, remeandrare curs de apă Jijia” ELABORATOR: S.C. EPMC CONSULTING S.R.L, str. Fagului, nr.11, Cluj-Napoca, 400483, jud.Cluj BENEFICIAR: ADMINISTRAȚIA BAZINALĂ DE APĂ PRUT - BÂRLAD Str. Theodor Vășcăuțeanu, nr. 10, Iași, județul Iași August 2020 1 LISTĂ DE SEMNĂTURI Întocmit: Biolog Denisa Kalisch Biolog Sabin Neațu Expert schimbări climatice inginer Cristina Ficuț Expert protecția mediului geograf Claudia-Thora Ionescu-Tămaș Verificat: Expert protecția mediului geograf Radu Carhaț Director general Cristina Corpodean www.epmc.ro EPMC Consulting SRL, Cluj-Napoca, Str. Fagului nr. 11, CP 400483, România Tel/fax: +4 0264 411 894, [email protected], CUI RO24799569, J12/4713/2008 2 CUPRINS 1. DESCRIEREA PROIECTULUI ............................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Informații generale ............................................................................................................................... 8 1.1.1 Aspecte introductive ....................................................................................................................... 10 1.1.2 Titularul proiectului .......................................................................................................................... 10 1.1.3 Elaboratorul raportului privind impactul asupra mediului ................................................................. 10 1.1.4 Denumirea proiectului ..................................................................................................................... 18 1.1.5 Scop și obiective ............................................................................................................................. 19 1.1.6 Mod de abordare ............................................................................................................................ 22 1.2 Amplasamentul proiectului ................................................................................................................. 23 1.3 Caracteristicile fizice ale proiectului, inclusiv a lucrărilor de demolare ................................................ 27 1.4 Durata construcției, funcționării și dezafectării proiectului și eșalonarea perioadei de implementare a proiectului propus ................................................................................................................................... 45 1.5 Documentele/ actele de reglementare existente privind planificarea / amenajarea teritoriului în zona amplasamentului ................................................................................................................................... 45 1.6 Modalitatea de conectare la infrastructura existentă .......................................................................... 46 1.7 Principalele caracteristici ale etapei de funcționare a proiectului ........................................................ 46 1.7.1 Caracteristicile etapei de realizare a proiectului propus .................................................................. 47 1.7.2 Caracteristicile etapei de funcționare a proiectului propus .............................................................. 52 1.8 Reziduuri și emisii preconizate........................................................................................................... 53 1.8.1 Tipuri și cantități de deșeuri rezultate în etapa de realizare și în etapa de funcționare a proiectului propus...................................................................................................................................................... 53 1.8.2 Spații de depozitare temporară ....................................................................................................... 55 1.8.3 Managementul deșeurilor ............................................................................................................... 55 2 ALTERNATIVE REZONABILE .............................................................................................................. 56 2.1 Alternativa 0 – Alternativa verde ........................................................................................................ 59 2.2 Alternativa 1... ........... ......................................................................................................................... 61 2.3 Alternativa 2... ................................................................................................................................... 66 2.4 Analiza comparativă a alternativelor de proiect și alternativa optimă aleasă ...................................... 70 3 DESCRIEREA ASPECTELOR RELEVANTE ALE STĂRII ACTUALE A MEDIULUI ............................. 74 3.1 Apă.................................. .................................................................................................................. .75 3.2 Aer.........................................................................................................................................................78 3.3 Sol.................... ................................................................................................................................. 82 www.epmc.ro EPMC Consulting SRL, Cluj-Napoca, Str. Fagului nr. 11, CP 400483, România Tel/fax: +4 0264 411 894, [email protected], CUI RO24799569, J12/4713/2008 3 3.4 Subsol/ Geologie ............................................................................................................................... 84 3.5 Biodiversitate ................................................................................................................................... 86 3.6 Peisaj................. .............................................................................................................................. 100 3.7 Mediu social și economic ................................................................................................................. 101 3.8 Condiții culturale, etnice, patrimoniu cultural .................................................................................... 102 4 IMPACTUL PROIECTULUI PROPUS ASUPRA FACTORILOR DE MEDIU ....................................... 110 4.1 Apă............................ ...................................................................................................................... 112 4.2 Aer................................................................................. ................................................................... 118 4.3 Sol/Subsol........ ............................................................................................................................... 120 4.4 Biodiversitate................................................................................................... .................................. 123 4.5 Peisaj............... ................................................................................................................................ 133 4.6 Mediu social și economic ................................................................................................................. 134 4.7 Condiții culturale, etnice, patrimoniu cultural .................................................................................... 136 4.8 Protecție împotriva zgomotului și vibrațiilor ...................................................................................... 137 5 EFECTE SEMNIFICATIVE PE CARE PROIECTUL LE POATE AVEA ASUPRA MEDIULUI .............. 138 5.1 Construirea și existența proiectului .................................................................................................. 139 5.2 Utilizarea resurselor naturale ........................................................................................................... 140 5.3 Emisia de poluanți, zgomot, vibrații, lumină, căldură și radiații ......................................................... 140 5.3.1 Poluanți fizici și chimici ai solului și subsolului .............................................................................. 140 5.3.2 Poluanți fizici și chimici ai apei subterane și de suprafață ............................................................. 140 5.3.3 Poluanți fizici și chimici ai aerului .................................................................................................. 141 5.4 Riscurile pentru sănătatea umană, patrimoniul cultural sau pentru mediu ........................................ 150 5.5 Cumularea efectelor cu cele ale altor proiecte existente și/sau aprobate ......................................... 150 5.6 Impactul proiectului asupra climei și vulnerabilitate proiectului la schimbările climatice .................. 154 5.7 Tehnologiile și substanțele folosite .................................................................................................. 163 5.8 Descrierea dificultăților .................................................................................................................... 164 6 MĂSURI PENTRU EVITAREA, PREVENIREA, REDUCEREA SAU COMPRESAREA ORICĂROR EFECTE NEGATIVE SEMNIFICATIVE ASUPRA MEDIULUI ................................................................ 165 6.1 Apă.................. ................................................................................................................................ 165 6.2 Aer.................... ..............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Exceptional Floods in the Prut Basin, Romania, in the Context of Heavy
    1 Exceptional floods in the Prut basin, Romania, in the context of 2 heavy rains in the summer of 2010 3 4 Gheorghe Romanescu1, Cristian Constantin Stoleriu 5 Alexandru Ioan Cuza, University of Iasi, Faculty of Geography and Geology, Department of 6 Geography, Bd. Carol I, 20 A, 700505 Iasi, Romania 7 8 Abstract. The year 2010 was characterized by devastating flooding in Central and Eastern 9 Europe, including Romania, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Bosnia-Herzegovina. This 10 study focuses on floods that occurred during the summer of 2010 in the Prut River basin, 11 which has a high percentage of hydrotechnical infrastructure. Strong floods occurred in 12 eastern Romania on the Prut River, which borders the Republic of Moldova and Ukraine, and 13 the Siret River. Atmospheric instability from 21 June-1 July 2010 caused remarkable amounts 14 of rain, with rates of 51.2 mm/50 min and 42.0 mm/30 min. In the middle Prut basin, there are 15 numerous ponds that help mitigate floods as well as provide water for animals, irrigation, and 16 so forth. The peak discharge of the Prut River during the summer of 2010 was 2,310 m3/s at 17 the Radauti Prut gauging station. High discharges were also recorded on downstream 18 tributaries, including the Baseu, Jijia, and Miletin. High discharges downstream occurred 19 because of water from the middle basin and the backwater from the Danube (a historic 20 discharge of 16,300 m3/s). The floods that occurred in the Prut basin in the summer of 2010 21 could not be controlled completely because the discharges far exceeded foreseen values.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economy of a Regional Metropolis. Case-Study: Iaşi, Romania*1
    THE ECONOMY OF A REGIONAL METROPOLIS. CASE-STUDY: IAŞI, ROMANIA*1 Claudia POPESCU Claudia POPESCU Professor, Faculty of International Economics and Business, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania Tel.: 0040-213-319.1900/378 E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The city of Iaşi with a population of over 300,000 people is the biggest European Union city at the border with the former-Soviet space. The article, part of an extended study on territorial development of Iaşi and its peri-urban area, focuses on the role of the city to trigger regional growth and to enhance cross border cooperation. Recent processes at work generating economic cohesion and integration are explored drawing on the catalytic factors of development and the specialization of local economies. The paper discusses also the externalities of urban growth such as the urban sprawl that causes land use conflicts at the rural-urban fringe. It argues that human capital and higher birth rates than the national average are the strengths, and low connectivity and accessibility are the weaknesses for regional growth. The regional polarization of the city is based on the supply of high level services over the entire North-East Region and opportunities to cross border cooperation through the expansion of an agro-alimentary supply-chain are highlighted. Building on the main capabilities and assets of the * The paper is part of the research conducted between 2009 agglomeration economies of Iaşi, the paper finally and 2010 in the view of drafting the Master Plan of the Iaşi identifies some of the mechanisms and structures Municipality, Romania.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of the Abundant Precipitations of 22-27 July 2008 in the North and North-East Moldova
    PRESENT ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, NR. 3, 2009 IMPACT OF THE ABUNDANT PRECIPITATIONS OF 22-27 JULY 2008 IN THE NORTH AND NORTH-EAST MOLDOVA Liviu Apostol1, Ovidiu Machidon2 Key words: abundant precipitations, floods, damages Abstract: In the last decade of the month of July 2008, the appearance and the persistence of a retrograde cyclone for a few days in the northern and northeastern area of Moldova determined the production of precipitations that had especially high intensity and that were taken over by the Prut and Siret Rivers and their tributaries. The high flow of the Siret River’s tributaries was mainly caused by the large quantities of precipitations fallen in the area in contact with the higher flanks of the Carpathians. The flash flood flow registered a few days later by the Prut River at the entrance to Romania was mainly caused by the rains fallen in the southwestern area of Ukraine. This paper presents the evolution of the process, quantities registered by the meteorological stations and the rain-gauge stations, the hydrological consequences and the impact of these pluviometric events on the environment of the northern and northeastern Moldova. Floods of the end of July and beginning of August 2009, in the northeastern part of Romania follow closely those of the end of 2005. The last decade witnessed in this area a succession without precedent of very hot and dry periods and rainy periods, some of them constituting records of the entire observation period. The cause was, as for the majority of Moldova catastrophic floods, a retrograde cyclone.
    [Show full text]
  • The Assessment of the Cultural Heritage's
    European Journal of Science and Theology, April 2013, Vol.9, No.2, 233-242 _______________________________________________________________________ THE ASSESSMENT OF THE CULTURAL HERITAGE’S VULNERABILITY TO FLASH FLOODS IN BAHLUI RIVER BASIN, IASI COUNTY Irina Dana Tutunaru*, Tudor Viorel Blidaru and Ionuţ Claudiu Pricop Prut Bârlad Water Basin Administration, 10 Th. Văscăuţeanu Str., 700462, Iasi, Romania (Received 25 June 2012, revised 10 February 2013) Abstract Floods are natural phenomena with significant impact on population, material goods and landscape. Flash floods are characterized by a high degree of risk, primarily due to reduced possibilities to make effective forecasts, but also because of weather and climatic characteristics that changed in the last decades, thus limiting the possibilities of application of appropriate defense and adaptation measures. In this context, the paper aims to make a preliminary assessment of vulnerability to flash floods, using hydrological simulation models based on GIS techniques applied in sub- basins, allowing a ranking of risks within relevant locations, especially concerning the cultural heritage in the county of Iasi. The development of methods for addressing such conditions creates the scientific basis for planning the required resource allocation for the protection of the cultural heritage hence for the implementation of water resources management plans and territorial development plans. Keywords: flash floods, cultural heritage, GIS, hydrological simulation 1. Introduction It is a well-known fact that each nation is defined, amongst other, by its history, its religious beliefs and its culture. Iasi city and Iasi County contain a large number of monuments and historical sites classified as cultural heritage, which cover a long historical period, from the famous Cucuteni culture to the medieval churches, from the Iron Age until the 20th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 4/2010 (Issue 1)
    Lakes, reservoirs and ponds, vol. 4(2): 131-144, 2010 ©Romanian Limnogeographical Association THE EVALUATION OF THE WATER CHEMISTRY AND QUALITY FOR THE LAKES FROM THE SOUTH OF THE HILLY PLAIN OF JIJIA (BAHLUI DRAINAGE BASIN) Ionuţ MINEA „Al.I.Cuza”University, Faculty of Geography and Geology, Iaşi, Romania, [email protected] Abstract In order to highlight the quality of the lake waters from the Bahlui drainage basin, we chose to analyse four principal lakes (Pârcovaci, Tansa, Chiriţa, Podu Iloaiei) and six secundary lakes (Aroneanu I and II, Ciric I, II and III and Cucuteni). The global presentation of the lakes’ water chemistry and quality is a sum of two different ways of analysis: the first based on standards (promulgated in 2006), according to which the lakes are analyzed as static ecosystem (the quality of the water corresponds to five different categories) and the second considering the lakes a dynamic ecosystem and working with the average of different quality parameters, from different periods. After we made the analysis, we showed that from the four first-order lakes, two (Chiriţa and Pârcovaci) can be included in the first quality category, and all the second-order lakes can be included in the third and fourth quality categories. This can be explained trough the clogging of the reservoirs or through the pollution caused by human activities in the hydrographic basin. Keywords: lakes, hydrochemistry, evaluation, Bahlui drainage basin 1. Introduction Bahlui drainage basin is located in the north-east of Romania, overlapping an area with a central position in the central part of the Moldavian Plateau, in direct hydrological relation with the hydrographic network of Prut River (fig.1).
    [Show full text]
  • Raport De Evaluare Preliminară a Riscului La Inundaţii Al ABA Prut
    EVALUAREA PRELIMINARĂ A RISCULUI LA INUNDAȚII ADMINISTRAȚIA BAZINALĂ DE APĂ PRUT-BÂRLAD Cuprins 1. Introducere ........................................................................................................................... 1 2. Cadrul legal și instituțional ................................................................................................. 3 3. Prezentare generală a spațiului hidrografic Prut-Bârlad ................................................ 6 3.1 Context fizico-geografic ............................................................................................................... 6 3.2 Context climatic ........................................................................................................................... 9 3.3 Resursele de apă ........................................................................................................................... 9 3.4 Zone protejate ............................................................................................................................. 10 3.5 Context socio-economic ............................................................................................................. 11 3.6 Patrimoniu cultural ..................................................................................................................... 12 3.7 Infrastructura de protecție împotriva inundațiilor ...................................................................... 15 4. Aspecte metodologice privind revizuirea și actualizarea E.P.R.I. ................................
    [Show full text]
  • Using 1D HEC-RAS Modeling and Lidar Data to Improve Flood Hazard Maps Accuracy: a Case Study from Jijia Floodplain (NE Romania)
    water Article Using 1D HEC-RAS Modeling and LiDAR Data to Improve Flood Hazard Maps Accuracy: A Case Study from Jijia Floodplain (NE Romania) Elena Hu¸tanu 1, Alin Mihu-Pintilie 2,* , Andrei Urzica 1 , Larisa Elena Paveluc 1,3, Cristian Constantin Stoleriu 1 and Adrian Grozavu 1 1 Department of Geography, Faculty of Geography and Geology, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Ia¸si,Bd. Carol I 20A, 700505 Ia¸si,Romania; [email protected] (E.H.); [email protected] (A.U.); [email protected] (L.E.P.); [email protected] (C.C.S.); [email protected] (A.G.) 2 Science Research Department, Institute for Interdisciplinary Research, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Ia¸si,St. Lascăr Catargi 54, 700107 Ia¸si,Romania 3 Siret Water Basin Administration, St. Cuza Voda 1, 600274 Bacău, Romania * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected]; Tel.: +40-741-912-245 Received: 24 April 2020; Accepted: 3 June 2020; Published: 6 June 2020 Abstract: The ability to extract flood hazard settings in highly vulnerable areas like populated floodplains by using new computer algorithms and hydraulic modeling software is an important aspect of any flood mitigation efforts. In this framework, the 1D/2D hydraulic models, which were generated based on a Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) derivate Digital Elevation Model (DEM) and processed within Geographical Information Systems (GIS), can improve large-scale flood hazard maps accuracy. In this study, we developed the first flood vulnerability assessment for 1% (100-year) and 0.1% (1000-year) recurrence intervals within the Jijia floodplain (north-eastern Romania), based on 1D HEC-RAS hydraulic modeling and LiDAR derivate DEM with 0.5 m spatial resolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Climatic Teleconnections with Influence on Some Rivers from South-Eastern Europe
    Boletín de la AsociaciónClimatic de teleconnections Geógrafos Españoles with influence N.º 69 - on 2015, some págs. rivers 37-62 from South-Eastern Europe I.S.S.N.: 0212-9426 CLIMATIC TELECONNECTIONS WITH INFLUENCE ON SOME RIVERS FROM SOUTH-EASTERN EUROPE Dumitru Mihăilă Andrei-Emil Briciu Department of Geography. Ştefan cel Mare University. Romania [email protected] ABSTRACT The influence of Arctic Oscillation, North Atlantic Oscillation, Southern Oscillation and the number of sunspots on river flow rates from the world, from Europe and in some areas of Romania has already been demonstrated. The present study extends the research of this type in the north-eastern of Romania. Arctic Oscillation and North Atlantic Oscillation are stronger in winter, acting through the precipitation on flow. AO and NAO have strong negative correlations with rainfall amounts and river flows. SO and sunspots influence on climate and rivers of the study area have weak statistical significance and occurs more indirectly. Keywords: hydrological area, climatic factors, NAO, AO, seasonal influences. RESUMEN La influencia de la Oscilación del Ártico (OA), la influencia de la Oscilación del Norte del Atlántico (ONA), la Oscilación del Sur (OS) y el número de manchas solares en los caudales de los ríos del mundo, de Europa y de algunas zonas de Rumanía ya han sido demostrados. El presente estudio extiende la investigación de este tipo en el nordeste de Rumanía. La Oscilación del Ártico y la Oscilación del Norte del Atlántico son más fuertes en invierno, actuando a través de la precipitación en el flujo. La OA y la ONA tienen una Fecha de recepción: julio 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Planul De Management Al Riscului La Inundaţii
    PLANUL DE MANAGEMENT AL RISCULUI LA INUNDAŢII Administraţia Bazinală de Apă Prut - Bârlad Draft 1 CUPRINS Cap. 1: Prezentarea generală a spațiului hidrografic Prut - Bârlad ............................3 Cap. 2: Riscul la inundaţii în spaƫiul hidrografic Prut - Bârlad .................................. 10 2.1. Descrierea lucrărilor existente de protecție împotriva inundațiilor ................. 10 2.2. Descrierea sistemelor existente de avertizare - alarmare şi de răspuns la inundaţii .................................................................................. 33 2.3. Istoricul inundaţiilor ........................................................................................ 38 2.4. Evenimentele semnificative de inundaţii ........................................................ 39 2.5. Zone cu risc potențial semnificativ la inundații............................................... 40 2.6. Hărți de hazard și hărți de risc la inundații ..................................................... 43 2.7. Indicatori statistici .......................................................................................... 47 Cap. 3: Descrierea obiectivelor de management al riscului la inundaţii ................... 49 Cap. 4. Sinteza măsurilor propuse şi prioritizarea acestora .................................... 52 4.1. Măsuri aplicabile la nivel național .................................................................. 52 4.2. Măsuri aplicabile la nivel de A.B.A. Prut - Bârlad .......................................... 56 4.3. Măsuri aplicabile
    [Show full text]
  • The Distribution of Wader Birds in Eastern Romania
    Analele Științifice ale Universității „Al. I. Cuza” Iași, s. Biologie animală, Tom LVII, 2011 THE DISTRIBUTION OF WADER BIRDS IN EASTERN ROMANIA Laurențiu PETRENCU1, Constantin ION1 and Emanuel BALTAG1 “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University, Faculty of Biology, Bd. Carol I, no. 11, Iasi, 700506, Romania, [email protected] 1 These authors equally contributed to present work Abstract. In the period 2008-2011, we had numerous bird counting actions in wetlands from Eastern Romania (the region of Moldavia - Romania, except Vrancea County, Danube Delta and Razelm-Sinoe lagoon complex). During these counting actions we identified 28 species of wader birds in the area of Moldavia and 37 species in Dobrogea. We find new data on breeding distribution of Avocet, Black-Winged Stilt, Stone Curlew, Little Ringed Plover, Kentish Plover, Lapwing, White-tailed Lapwing, Common Sandpiper, Redshank and Curlew. On migration of wader birds we find new important sites, especially in Moldavian Region. Thus, the region of Moldavia and Dobrogea, thanks to the appropriate habitats and the trophic resources, represent an important breeding, feeding and resting area for the wader bird species from Europe. Keywords: wader birds, ecology, distribution, Eastern Romania Rezumat. Distribuția păsărilor limicole din estul României. În perioada 2008-2011, am realizat numeroase ieșiri in teren pentru inventarierea speciilor de păsări esxistente în zonele umede din estul României (regiunea Moldovei, exceptând mare parte din județul Vrancea, Delta Dunării și Complexul Razelm Sinoe). În timpul acestor deplasări au fost identificate 28 de specii de limicole în regiunea Moldovei și 37 în zona Dobrogei. Au fost identificate locuri noi de cuibărit pentru ciocîntors, piciorong, pasărea ogorului, prundărașul gulerat mic, prundărașul de sărătură, nagâț, nagâțul cu coadă alba, fluierarul de munte, fluierarul cu picioare roșii și culicul mare.
    [Show full text]
  • Aui Geologie
    Available online at http://geology.uaic.ro/auig/ AUI Analele Stiintifice ale Universitatii “Al. I. Cuza” din Iasi GEOLOGIE Seria Geologie 59 (1) (2013) 51–60 Natural background levels and threshold values for phreatic waters from the Quaternary deposits of the Bahlui River basin Cristina Oana Stan1,2, Iuliana Buliga1 1 “Al. I. Cuza” University of Iaşi, Faculty of Geography and Geology, Department of Geology, 20A Carol I Blv., 700505 Iaşi, Romania 2 Romanian Academy, Department of Iaşi, Geography Group, 8 Carol I Blv., 700505 Iaşi, Romania Abstract In the Moldavian Plain, known as one of the poorest regions of Romania when it comes to its water supplies, the evaluation of the groundwater (which is used for different purposes) becomes highly necessary. According to the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC and Groundwater Directive 2000/118/EC, as part of their effort to achieve the good chemical and quantitative status for groundwater, EU member states must assess the latter using threshold values as quality standards for pollutants in groundwater. The present paper presents a case study based on the methodology for the derivation of natural background levels and groundwater threshold values suggested through the EU research project BRIDGE. Given that the groundwater bodies from the study area are exposed to anthropic stress, the 90th percentile is used as natural background level for the phreatic waters from the Quaternary deposits of the Bahlui River. The threshold values were established using drinking water standards as reference It was, thus, discovered, that, when the 90th percentile is used as natural background level, the threshold values obtained + + 2+ 2- in the present study for the parameters NH4 , Na , Mg , Fe and SO4 are higher than the reference values.
    [Show full text]
  • Exceptional Floods in the Prut Basin, Romania, in the Context of Heavy Rains in the Summer of 2010
    Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 381–396, 2017 www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/17/381/2017/ doi:10.5194/nhess-17-381-2017 © Author(s) 2017. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Exceptional floods in the Prut basin, Romania, in the context of heavy rains in the summer of 2010 Gheorghe Romanescu and Cristian Constantin Stoleriu Faculty of Geography and Geology, Department of Geography, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Bd. Carol I, 20 A, 700505 Iasi, Romania Correspondence to: Gheorghe Romanescu ([email protected]) Received: 30 August 2016 – Discussion started: 12 September 2016 Revised: 4 January 2017 – Accepted: 13 February 2017 – Published: 10 March 2017 Abstract. The year 2010 was characterized by devastating ina, and Montenegro (Bissolli et al., 2011; Szalinska et al., flooding in central and eastern Europe, including Romania, 2014) (Fig. 1). The strongest floods from 2010 were regis- the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Bosnia-Herzegovina. This tered in the Danube basin (see Table 1). For Romania, we study focuses on floods that occurred during the summer of underlined the floods from the basins of Prut, Siret, Moldova, 2010 in the Prut River basin, which has a high percentage and Bistri¸tarivers. The most devastating floods in Romania of hydrotechnical infrastructure. Strong floods occurred in occurred in Moldavia (Prut, Siret) and Transylvania (Tisa, eastern Romania on the Prut River, which borders the Re- Somes, Tarnave, Olt). The most deaths were recorded in public of Moldova and Ukraine, and the Siret River. Atmo- Poland (25), Romania (six on the Buhai River, a tributary spheric instability from 21 June to 1 July 2010 caused re- of the Jijia), Slovakia (three), Serbia (two), Hungary (two), markable amounts of rain, with rates of 51.2 mm/50 min and and the Czech Republic (two) (Romanescu and Stoleriu, 42.0 mm/30 min.
    [Show full text]