NPDB Code Lists
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Disability Classification System
CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR STUDENTS WITH A DISABILITY Track & Field (NB: also used for Cross Country where applicable) Current Previous Definition Classification Classification Deaf (Track & Field Events) T/F 01 HI 55db loss on the average at 500, 1000 and 2000Hz in the better Equivalent to Au2 ear Visually Impaired T/F 11 B1 From no light perception at all in either eye, up to and including the ability to perceive light; inability to recognise objects or contours in any direction and at any distance. T/F 12 B2 Ability to recognise objects up to a distance of 2 metres ie below 2/60 and/or visual field of less than five (5) degrees. T/F13 B3 Can recognise contours between 2 and 6 metres away ie 2/60- 6/60 and visual field of more than five (5) degrees and less than twenty (20) degrees. Intellectually Disabled T/F 20 ID Intellectually disabled. The athlete’s intellectual functioning is 75 or below. Limitations in two or more of the following adaptive skill areas; communication, self-care; home living, social skills, community use, self direction, health and safety, functional academics, leisure and work. They must have acquired their condition before age 18. Cerebral Palsy C2 Upper Severe to moderate quadriplegia. Upper extremity events are Wheelchair performed by pushing the wheelchair with one or two arms and the wheelchair propulsion is restricted due to poor control. Upper extremity athletes have limited control of movements, but are able to produce some semblance of throwing motion. T/F 33 C3 Wheelchair Moderate quadriplegia. Fair functional strength and moderate problems in upper extremities and torso. -
Ifds Functional Classification System & Procedures
IFDS FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM & PROCEDURES MANUAL 2009 - 2012 Effective – 1 January 2009 Originally Published – March 2009 IFDS, C/o ISAF UK Ltd, Ariadne House, Town Quay, Southampton, Hampshire, SO14 2AQ, GREAT BRITAIN Tel. +44 2380 635111 Fax. +44 2380 635789 Email: [email protected] Web: www.sailing.org/disabled 1 Contents Page Introduction 5 Part A – Functional Classification System Rules for Sailors A1 General Overview and Sailor Evaluation 6 A1.1 Purpose 6 A1.2 Sailing Functions 6 A1.3 Ranking of Functional Limitations 6 A1.4 Eligibility for Competition 6 A1.5 Minimum Disability 7 A2 IFDS Class and Status 8 A2.1 Class 8 A2.2 Class Status 8 A2.3 Master List 10 A3 Classification Procedure 10 A3.0 Classification Administration Fee 10 A3.1 Personal Assistive Devices 10 A3.2 Medical Documentation 11 A3.3 Sailors’ Responsibility for Classification Evaluation 11 A3.4 Sailor Presentation for Classification Evaluation 12 A3.5 Method of Assessment 12 A3.6 Deciding the Class 14 A4 Failure to attend/Non Co-operation/Misrepresentation 16 A4.1 Sailor Failure to Attend Evaluation 16 A4.2 Non Co-operation during Evaluation 16 A4.3 International Misrepresentation of Skills and/or Abilities 17 A4.4 Consequences for Sailor Support Personnel 18 A4.5 Consequences for Teams 18 A5 Specific Rules for Boat Classes 18 A5.1 Paralympic Boat Classes 18 A5.2 Non-Paralympic Boat Classes 19 Part B – Protest and Appeals B1 Protest 20 B1.1 General Principles 20 B1.2 Class Status and Protest Opportunities 21 B1.3 Parties who may submit a Classification Protest -
Reducts in Multi-Adjoint Concept Lattices
Reducts in Multi-Adjoint Concept Lattices Maria Eugenia Cornejo1, Jes´usMedina2, and Elo´ısa Ram´ırez-Poussa2 1 Department of Statistic and O.R., University of C´adiz.Spain Email: [email protected] 2 Department of Mathematics, University of C´adiz.Spain Email: fjesus.medina,[email protected] Abstract. Removing redundant information in databases is a key issue in Formal Concept Analysis. This paper introduces several results on the attributes that generate the meet-irreducible elements of a multi-adjoint concept lattice, in order to provide different properties of the reducts in this framework. Moreover, the reducts of particular multi-adjoint concept lattices have been computed in different examples. Keywords: attribute reduction, reduct, multi-adjoint concept lattice 1 Introduction Attribute reduction is an important research topic in Formal Concept Analysis (FCA) [1, 4, 10, 15]. Reducts are the minimal subsets of attributes needed in or- der to compute a lattice isomorphic to the original one, that is, that preserve the whole information of the original database. Hence, the computation of these sets is very interesting. For example, they are useful in order to obtain attribute implications and, since the complexity to build concept lattices directly depend on the number of attributes and objects, if a reduct can be detected before com- puting the whole concept lattice, the complexity will significantly be decreased. Different fuzzy extensions of FCA have been introduced [2, 3, 9, 14]. One of the most general is the multi-adjoint concept lattice framework [11, 12]. Based on a characterization of the meet-irreducible elements of a multi-adjoint concept lattice, a suitable attribute reduction method has recently been presented in [6]. -
Library of Congress Classification
R MEDICINE (GENERAL) R Medicine (General) Periodicals. Societies. Serials 5 International periodicals and serials 10 Medical societies Including aims, scope, utility, etc. International societies 10.5.A3 General works 10.5.A5-Z Individual societies America English United States. Canada 11 Periodicals. Serials 15 Societies British West Indies. Belize. Guyana 18 Periodicals. Serials 20 Societies Spanish and Portuguese Latin America 21 Periodicals. Serials 25 Societies 27.A-Z Other, A-Z 27.F7 French Europe English 31 Periodicals. Serials 35 Societies Dutch 37 Periodicals. Serials 39 Societies French 41 Periodicals. Serials 45 Societies German 51 Periodicals. Serials 55 Societies Italian 61 Periodicals. Serials 65 Societies Spanish and Portuguese 71 Periodicals. Serials 75 Societies Scandinavian 81 Periodicals. Serials 85 Societies Slavic 91 Periodicals. Serials 95 Societies 96.A-Z Other European languages, A-Z 96.H8 Hungarian Asia 97 English 97.5.A-Z Other European languages, A-Z 97.7.A-Z Other languages, A-Z Africa 98 English 98.5.A-Z Other European languages, A-Z 98.7.A-Z Other languages, A-Z 1 R MEDICINE (GENERAL) R Periodicals. Societies. Serials -- Continued Australasia and Pacific islands 99 English 99.5.A-Z Other European languages, A-Z 99.7.A-Z Other languages, A-Z Indexes see Z6658+ (101) Yearbooks see R5+ 104 Calendars. Almanacs Cf. AY81.M4 American popular medical almanacs 106 Congresses 108 Medical laboratories, institutes, etc. Class here papers and proceedings For works about these organizations see R860+ Collected works (nonserial) Cf. R126+ Ancient Greek and Latin works 111 Several authors 114 Individual authors Communication in medicine Cf. -
Reframing Sport Contexts: Labeling, Identities, and Social Justice
Reframing Sport Contexts: Labeling, Identities, and Social Justice Dr. Ted Fay and Eli Wolff Sport in Society Disability in Sport Initiative Northeastern University Critical Context • Marginalization (Current Status Quo) vs. • Legitimatization (New Inclusive Paradigm) Critical Context Naturalism vs. Trans-Humanism (Wolbring, G. (2009) How Do We Handle Our Differences related to Labeling Language and Cultural Identities? • Stereotyping? • Prejudice? • Discrimination? (Carr-Ruffino, 2003, p. 1) Ten Major Cultural Differences 1) Source of Control 2) Collectivism or Individualism 3) Homogeneous or Heterogeneous 4) Feminine or Masculine 5) Rank Status 6) Risk orientation 7) Time use 8) Space use 9) Communication Style 10) Economic System (Carr – Ruffino, 2003, p.27) Rationale for Inclusion • Divisioning by classification relative to “fair play” and equity principles • Sport model rather than “ism” segregated model (e.g., by race, gender, disability, socio-economic class, sexual orientation, look (body image), sect (religion), age) • Legitimacy • Human rights and equality Social Dynamics of Inequality Reinforce and reproduce Social Institutions Ideology Political (Patriarchy) Economic Educational Perpetuates Religious Prejudice & Are institutionalized by Discrimination Cultural Practices (ISM) Sport Music Art (Sage, 1998) Five Interlinking Conceptual Frameworks • Critical Change Factors Model (CCFM) • Organizational Continuum in Sport Governance (OCSG) • Criteria for Inclusion in Sport Organizations (CISO) • Individual Multiple Identity Sport Classifications Index (IMISCI) • Sport Opportunity Spectrum (SOS) Critical Change Factors Model (CCFM) F1) Change/occurrence of major societal event (s) affecting public opinion toward ID group. F2) Change in laws, government and court action in changing public policies toward ID group. F3) Change in level of influence of high profile ID group role models on public opinion. -
Recursive Syntactic Pattern Learning by Songbirds
Recursive syntactic pattern learning by songbirds Timothy Q. Gentner, Kimberly M. Fenn, Daniel Margoliash, and Howard C. Nusbaum Supplementary Information Table S1 provides an overview of all the training and testing conditions. Condition Stimulus 1 Baseline Training A2B2 and (AB)2, n=2 2 Transfer 1 Novel A2B2 and (AB)2, n=2 3 Probe Test 1 Familiar A2B2 and (AB)2, n=2 (80% of trials) Novel A2B2 and (AB)2, n=2 (10% of trials) Agrammatical AAAA, BBBB, ABBA, BAAB (10% of trials) 4 Probe Test 2 Familiar A2B2 and (AB)2, n=2 (80% of trials) Novel AnBn and (AB)n, n=3, 4 (20% of trials) 5 Probe Test 3 Familiar A2B2 and (AB)2, n=2 (80% of trials) A*B* (10% of trials) Novel AnBn and (AB)n, n=2,3,4 (10% of trials) Table S1. Overview of the training and testing conditions in order to which subjects were exposed. Stimuli marked with (*) comprised speech syllables instead of starling song motifs. Probe tests with novel A2B2 and (AB)2 stimuli Because the novel transfer stimuli were reinforced with the same response contingencies used in the initial training, the animals’ behaviour was changing (i.e. they were learning) as we measured generalization. To examine generalization without contingent reinforcement and thus without additional learning, we tested subjects using a “probe” procedure. The reinforcement regimen during probe sessions allowed us to measure generalization from the classes defined by the familiar CFG and FSG stimuli to novel stimuli without any direct effects of differential reinforcement learning on the latter (see Additional Methods). -
International Triathlon Union • ITU Competition Rules
ITU Competition Rules Approved by the ITU Executive Board, in November 2015 Green highlight – added as of November 2015 Red highlight – deleted as of November 2015 International Triathlon Union ITU Competition Rules 06-12-2015 1 The ITU Competition Rules is the master source document, found on ITU’s website at www.triathlon.org. The web based document acts as the official (authorised) reference document and is maintained based on authorised amendments in accordance with recommendations by the ITU Technical Committee and accepted by the ITU Executive Board. Contact International Triathlon Union (ITU) Maison du Sport International Av. de Rhodanie 54 Lausanne CH -1007, Switzerland Tel +41 21 614 60 30 Fax +41 21 614 60 39 Email: [email protected] For general information about ITU visit www.triathlon.org International Triathlon Union ITU Competition Rules 06-12-2015 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION: _________________________________________________________________________ 4 2. CONDUCT OF ATHLETES: ___________________________________________________________________ 6 3. PENALTIES: _____________________________________________________________________________ 16 4. SWIMMING CONDUCT: ___________________________________________________________________ 20 5. CYCLING CONDUCT:______________________________________________________________________ 25 6. RUNNING CONDUCT: ____________________________________________________________________ 33 7. TRANSITION AREA CONDUCT: _____________________________________________________________ 34 8. COMPETITION -
Field Indicators of Hydric Soils
United States Department of Field Indicators of Agriculture Natural Resources Hydric Soils in the Conservation Service United States In cooperation with A Guide for Identifying and Delineating the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils Hydric Soils, Version 8.2, 2018 Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States A Guide for Identifying and Delineating Hydric Soils Version 8.2, 2018 (Including revisions to versions 8.0 and 8.1) United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, in cooperation with the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils Edited by L.M. Vasilas, Soil Scientist, NRCS, Washington, DC; G.W. Hurt, Soil Scientist, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; and J.F. Berkowitz, Soil Scientist, USACE, Vicksburg, MS ii In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. -
Connexion Client Cataloging Quick Reference
OCLC Connexion Client Cataloging Quick Reference Introduction Keystroke shortcuts The Connexion client is a Windows-based interface to OCLC • Use default keystroke shortcuts or assign your own to activate Connexion® used to access WorldCat for cataloging. commands, insert characters, run macros, and insert text strings. This quick reference provides brief instructions for editing, saving, • View key assignments in View > Assigned Keys.To print or copy exporting, and printing labels for bibliographic records; using local files; the list, click Print or Copy to Clipboard. creating and adding records to WorldCat; replacing WorldCat records; Tip: Before printing, click a column heading to sort the list by data batch processing; and cataloging with non-Latin scripts. in the column. • Assign your own keystrokes in Tools > Keymaps. Multiscript support: The client supports the following non-Latin scripts: • Print a function key template to put at the top of your keyboard: Arabic, Armenian, Bengali, Chinese, Cyrillic, Devanagari, Ethiopic, Greek, Hebrew, Japanese, Korean, Syriac, Tamil, and Thai. www.oclc.org/support/documentation/connexion/client/ gettingstarted/keyboardtemplate.pdf. This quick reference does not cover instructions for authorities work or instructions already available in: Toolbar • Getting Started with Connexion Client • The client installs with three toolbars displayed by default: • Connexion Client Setup Worksheet o Main client toolbar (with command-equivalent buttons) • Connexion: Searching WorldCat Quick Reference o WorldCat quick search tool Quick tools for text strings and user tools Connexion client documentation assumes knowledge of MARC o cataloging. • Customize the main client toolbar: In Tools > Toolbar Editor, drag and drop buttons to add or remove, or reset to the default. -
Classified Activities
Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board CLASSIFIED ACTIVITIES Statement of Federal Financial Accounting Standards Exposure Draft Written comments are requested by March 16, 2018 December 14, 2017 THE FEDERAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ADVISORY BOARD The Secretary of the Treasury, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and the Comptroller General of the United States established the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB or “the Board”) in October 1990. FASAB is responsible for promulgating accounting standards for the United States government. These standards are recognized as generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for the federal government. Accounting standards are typically formulated initially as a proposal after considering the financial and budgetary information needs of citizens (including the news media, state and local legislators, analysts from private firms, academe, and elsewhere), Congress, federal executives, federal program managers, and other users of federal financial information. FASAB publishes the proposed standards in an exposure draft for public comment. In some cases, FASAB publishes a discussion memorandum, invitation for comment, or preliminary views document on a specific topic before an exposure draft. A public hearing is sometimes held to receive oral comments in addition to written comments. The Board considers comments and decides whether to adopt the proposed standards with or without modification. After review by the three officials who sponsor FASAB, the Board publishes adopted standards in a Statement of Federal Financial Accounting Standards. The Board follows a similar process for Statements of Federal Financial Accounting Concepts, which guide the Board in developing accounting standards and formulating the framework for federal accounting and reporting. -
Pocket Filters Made of Non-Woven Synthetic Fibres – Type
PFS 6.2 – X XPFStestregistrierung Pocket filters made of non- woven synthetic fibres Type PFS Prefilters or final filters in ventilation systems Pocket filters for the separation of fine dust Filter classes M5, M6, F7 Performance data tested to EN 779 AIR FILTERS CLASS M5-F9 Eurovent certification for fine dust filters Meets the hygiene requirements of VDI 6022 Non-woven synthetic fibres, welded 6 Eurovent certification Enlarged filter area due to filter pockets Low initial differential pressure and high dust holding capacity Variable number of pockets and pocket depth H Quick installation and filter changing times due to easy, safe handling ISC GE N TE IE S T Fitting into standard cell frames for filter walls (type SIF) or into universal G E Y T H casings (type UCA) for duct installation Optional equipment and accessories V 2 DI 602 Front frame made of plastic or galvanised sheet steel Tested to VDI 6022 09/2013 – DE/en K7 – 6.2 – 1 Pocket filters made of non-woven synthetic fibres General information PFS Type Page PFS General information 6.2 – 2 Order code 6.2 – 3 Dimensions and weight 6.2 – 4 Specification text 6.2 – 5 Basic information and nomenclature 10.1 – 1 Description Application Materials and surfaces – Pocket filter made of non-woven synthetic – Filter media made of non-woven synthetic fibres type PFS for the separation of fine dust fibres – Fine dust filter: Prefilter or final filter in – Frame made of plastic or galvanised sheet ventilation systems steel Classification Standards and guidelines – Eurovent certification for -
![F6-13 202 (Ibc [F] 202)](https://docslib.b-cdn.net/cover/4091/f6-13-202-ibc-f-202-1014091.webp)
F6-13 202 (Ibc [F] 202)
F6-13 202 (IBC [F] 202) Proposed Change as Submitted Proponent: Elley Klausbruckner representing Klausbruckner & Associates Inc ([email protected]) Revise as follows: SECTION 202 (IBC [F] 202) GENERAL DEFINITIONS FLAMMABLE SOLID. A solid, other than a blasting agent or explosive, that is capable of causing fire through friction, absorption of moisture, spontaneous chemical change or retained heat from manufacturing or processing, or which has an ignition temperature below 212°F (100°C) or which burns so vigorously and persistently when ignited as to create a serious hazard. A chemical shall be considered a flammable solid as determined in accordance with the test method of CPSC 16 CFR Part 1500.44, if it ignites and burns with a self-sustained flame at a rate greater than 0.1 0.0866 inch (2.5 mm 2.2 mm) per second along its major axis. Reason: The definition proposed is in line with GHS [Globally Harmonized System] which is now adopted by OSHA. When an MSDS is prepared today, a material classified as “Flammable Solids” is typically based on this definition and not the previous definition [existing language in the Fire Code]. For additional details please see http://www.osha.gov/dsg/hazcom/ghs.html. Cost Impact: The code change proposal will not increase the cost of construction. 202-FLAMMABLE SOLID-F-KLAUSBRUCKNER Committee Action Hearing Results Committee Action: Disapproved Committee Reason: The disapproval was based on the committee’s judgment that the code change could be the beginning of a trend toward acceptance of OSHA definitions which are much different than IFC definitions and are focused on worker and work- place safety only.