DOCSLIB.ORG

Staff Report Sep 92 Plus Appb and Rev.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Staff Report Sep 92 Plus Appb and Rev.Pdf HYDROBASINSWMHIN THE CENTRALVALLEY, CALIFORNIA 4 Tehama 8 EnterpriseFlat-LowerCottonwood 10 North Delta 71. Valley Putah-Cache 15 Marysville 79 Valley-American 20A Colusa 208 Butte 20C Sutter Bypass ?0O Sycamore-Sutter , 32 Eastof the Delta 35A Turlock 358 Merced 40 WestsideSan Joaquin River 41, Grasslands MA Central Delta MB West of the Delta MC South Delta 3J Sanjoaquin Valley Floor 51A Kings River 51B Westside 57 Kern River 58A Kaweah River 588 Tule River 58C Poso 58D Tulare Lake FTSEG L bceron of H.gr Bdrc wrorr thc GrrFel l/llry' Grffonll for thc Erd srrtrcr hbc plilr -_., L- l\l i S HASIA )*sq''j ENN L f ,-\ _-_r- ',-'/ lil in'/ - lt EvaoA I 2AA YUEl I f5 . i PLACER -ts \-/,/ EL DORADO A'ra-T solero J o \ 11r--, -,-r/ -,".=)- -/'n'-.-; \ HAFTpOSA HYDROBASINTNDEX Tehama 41\< EnerDnseFlal-Lower Cononwood 10 Nonh Detta 11 ValleyPutah.Cacne r< Marysulle Valley-Amercan 20A Cobsa 208 Bune Sun€rBypass 20D Sycannre.Sutter Eastol the Dene 35A Tudeck Mefced 40 WectsiJeSan JoaeutnRiver 41 GrasslarEs 44A- CemralDetta ..riB We$ ot the Dena 44C SoulhDetta 45 San.raqurnVallev Floor 51A KingrsRruer 51B WestEde Kem Rrver 58A Kaw€ahRiver str Tule Ruer SL Poso SU TulareLake s-r- SI.'MMARY OF CHANNELS DOMINATED BY AGRICULTURAL ACTTVITIES CATEGORYO) CATEGORY(c) #AGENCY # WATER LENGTH # WATER LENGTH DRAINAGE AREA REPORTS BODIES (MILES) BODIES (MILES) SACRAMENTO Drainage Basin 4 2 0 0 I ZT DrainageBasin 1l 19 18 190 39s 832 Drainage Basin 15 L4 15 83 130 387 Drainage Basin 19 4 8 54 267 530 Drainage Basin 20A 18 l4 75 1L52 1738 Drainage Basin 208 9 8 r20 2r3 516 Drainage Basin 20C L7 5 19 262 5r7 DrainageBasin 20D 10 0 0 65 62r Subtotal: 93 68 541 2485 5r60 SAN JOAQUIN DrainageBasin 35A 6 81 441 1707 DrainageBasin 358 8 T7 180 513 905 brainage Basin 40 )< 6 67 t07 280 DrainageBasin 41 20 7 141 380 Lt14 Drainage Basin 45 4 9 70 274 624 O Subtotal: 63 46 s38 1715 4689 DELTA DrainageBasin 10 71 I 5 230 585 DrainageBasin 32 8 92 59 r23 Drainage Basin 44A 36 0 0 252 560 DrainageBasin 448 2 r5 )a 56 DrainageBasin 44C 7 2 T4 )'r< 225 '70 Subtotal: 13 126 789 1548 TULARE LAKE 109 28 268 1068 &ffi FOOTHILLS .A 5 39 234 661 Area Subtotal: 3s9 160 I512 6291 18519 MAJOR WATERWAYS 5 0 0 28 1293 TOTAL: 364 160 t5L2 6319 r98t2 B-s I o fia -ho-Xo;-^-ooRo9^ € t-6Oxa - \o €o -ON' F a z= s r F > ri> fia ro o F@\f,-O r a' €> F- o' r-'! m o N KV 3t \o N r 6 FI H4 91XFrco, G &.: e.l (r6NOFalr6=$EEHBFg Frgeec.l si^ ln n at =F--\Or m ==Xr'oq N F )i E= t- FE re 6 d F-O--O o\ -Nt\O€ €\D o\ -EeE$9eq ohlx€\o € O\N .t <A NS-dd En€-€ al AN € at i5 B9 o F) ;:F o 6t U @^ono\6€ \o -^o^\o o or N Hq Ool',1 -t\.-Os 6 6F \o t\ I-NtsNNN 6l F-+ N ! al Bre$s 5:F:S d E= \e lob ;!4 t.r Eq N O\€r G o\ Rno99rt \OF@FO r r t. KA -:nESE5- ;(h+=i n s@ € B9 N R lr z * I5 lE l6 FT lo eit FA t F O ? -TSP8a nIoo'] tr lr N N ln -!a l.- z o e Fs E o=!-oooo F .lS-.tr- v -\OO-c.l <a N N \o \o ,o F F9 E t Zq d :.E u) -:-i-e\o6--^=o.ororvora t-. s aha.aa o\ 6l m FB$F. N cl NO g I > E2 -. E) P F F. trl oSnr-!eno \o\o\oFm € oNoNC) €t r F 5E N € F9 € 6 e? -1 >.ah 3 <ouO E <a E <cou U) dh60000 hhC)-h O6tvs+ ,) F *-d-dNdN motlft dogs? F e.l c 6 7 .= .e.= .= .= .= .= .= .= .= o x u6hoao64Q L66GQGd6F =FTgEB FPEsg *caFcaEataFQEE tlltcol!cot0 6m6m6 3 I g9!tsr9.8.9"9.9r9. gr g. g, g, g" .t F o Yj66G66_dO6dd 9. 9. 9" 9. 9" -666666C6 F 6 FF c x.5-FFF'FN'FFFGGd .E .E .E .E * .E .s .E .5 .5 ' z Edddd66dF o O vnAnnnAnn ZAA AXA -1AAAAA IA -v v) qO rE a th A-u o Thefoonotes Estedbelow are used throughout the following ubles FOOTNOTES WATER QUALITY CONCERNS: I = excesssediment ia taiiwater 2 = elevated TDS concenuations 3 = eievated boron concerurado'ns 4 = elevated selenium concenEations 5 = elevated molybdenum concentrations 6 = tEsr,icides "7 = fenilizers 8 = sewage 9 = dairy wasr l0 = urbansorm runoff I I = elevated arsenic concenrradons 12 = elevarcd chromium concentralions 13 = eievated mercury concenuations 14 = treated wast3 water WATER TYPE: WT = wetland discharge WW = waste water treatment plant effluent Tail = agdculrural nil water Tile - agriculnrrai rile water U = urbanstormnrnoff NF = nauralfloodflows OP = operadonal spill GW = ground water SW = surface waEr DW = dairy wasrc CONSTRUCTION: E = earthlined C = concrerc iined P = pipeline b-"1 THE DELTA BASINS TheDelta area has beendivided into five basins. Theyare DrainageBasin No. 10, 32, 44A, 448 and 44C. The tidal characteristics of the De]ia area are dominantin the NorthDelta (Basin10), central De'lta(Basin 44A) and south Delta (Basin 44C) Basins. The areas west of the Delta (Basin aaB) drawwater foi irrigation mostly fr.omthe.Delta. The basin east of the Delta (Basin 32) contains water districts which drain from the eastside of the valte.f,tnto ttr6 Deltabasins. TheDelta Basins that are influencedby tjdal action haveunique characteristics. Thesebasins containht'gh1y organjc soils andare typ'ica1'lyislands suryounded by channelsof water. Thesewaters are fed primari1V bV th-eSacramento and San JoaquinRiv_q.rs. Water in the Delta meandersthrough sioughs, cuts, canalsand channels. Thedirection of thes.eflows dependson inflow vblumes,tides, export pumping,.diversionsand other factors. Becauseof these characteristics,'the water bodies do not easily fit the descriptions in the In'landSurface Witers P'lan. An argumentcan be madefor a separateclassification systemfor these Delta Basins. Fewwater bodies in theseBasins are agricultural suDplvor drainaoe dominated.Many of the channelsin the Delta hav-ebeen construiteO anO aieaoEa partial'ly for agricul.ture.but nonewould fal I into category (b) designati;n. Tt,qsgmajgr water bodies have not beenclassified as ca{eg6ry(l) bedauseof t tidal influencesand difficulties fitting theminto the clalsifitaiion scheme. Since.many^ofthe De'ltaislands are 'landslower than surroundinglands, 'Rather water supp'lv methodsdiffer from other irri_gated in the Central Vli ley. ihfi ; network of canals.yf,i.lt su.ppiywater to a numberof groweri, imigation ii lvRicatly accomplished-by.thesiphoning of the surroundingwater Uy i-natviauai farms. Morethan. 1,.800 :iphons divert-water for crop and-livestoiftp"oAr.iion (StatgLands Conmisrsisn_, 199L and DHR l9p_7).. Drainage'is almost entineiy ;;;i;;; (taii) water with little subsurface(tiie) water. Reclamationdistrjcts, foundthroughout the Delta,.areresponsible for jslands. the system of leveeswhich pro.tectthe Thesedistricts providedmuch of ttre"Oiii 9l dra'inage.- Irrigation supply is _theresponsibi l ity of individual iarmJ. Therefore, informat'ionon water supp'lycanais and irrigation systemsmay be I acki nq. REFERENCES: State Lards Qemmissisa, 1991. Delto-Esawy Califomia Inland. Coas\ A public TrusL ?Ig Departnent of Water Resources, 1-987. Sacranento-San loaEtin Delta Attas. 71 pp. 6-5 TULARE LAKE BASIN Category(b) Water Bodies The following information supports our list of waterbodies recommendedto be categortzedas Category b waterbodies as defined in the Iniand SurfaceWaters pian. These water bodies are shown on Figures 1 and 2. Kings Riven The.Kings River begins-in the highest eievations of the SienraNevada in the northeastpart of the Tulare Lake Hydrologic Basin. It is dammed near piedra in the SierraNevada foothills to form Pine Elat Reservoir. From the reservoir, it fiows in a southwesteriy_ direction towards historic Tulare Lake. About one mile eastof where it meetsHighway 41, the River splits into North Fork and ClarLs Fork. At the Crescent Headworks, the North Foik continues into the Fresno Slough which connectsthe Kings River to the San |oaq_uinRiver during flood periods. (The Basin Pian describesthe portion of the Frgsno blough from thett"r..rit i"aoworks to the Stiruon Weir as the North Fork.) The last eilnt miles of the Fresno Slough has beenreconstmcted and wili not be discussed-her". Approximateiv three miles downstream of the North Fork/Clartcs.Fork :piit tfre'S'outfrr.if;pfil- from the Clarks Fork. The South Fork and Clarks Forli reconverge five milds Jo*r**",",. Kings River peoples lhe downstrea:n of weq,_excfr$.g the Fresno slough, is {omiryted by agn:ilt'rd supply flows from Marctr ,t-igh eugus; J-"n y""r. Aquatic resourc€s in these readres are enhanced due to thise flows. "d*ltu"l The Lower South Fork is dominated from Septenrber through February by a ground (use.d mix of water for irrigation) and agricuitural disctrargL. a"" idr"ti. resourc€spresent in the Lower south Foik of the Kings Riier oiri *iv as a result of theseagriculturai flows. The FresnoSiough is normally dry:xcgpt for flood periods when it convevsKings River water out of the Tulare Lake Basin. During outo periocis, the Slough receives small quantities of agricultural dischargeswhictr"percoiaie q*;klii;;;" bed' Any stream aquatic resourcesPresent in the slough during periods br low precipitation exist oniv as a resuit of thesedischarges. EastsideSheams: Eastside streamsare ephemeraland have water after rainfall events. Several streamson the eastsicie of Fresnoand Tu-larecounties mav be ciominated ,,frost hrate.r" bv dunng winter months. Thesestrearru inciude wahtoke c;k,-i;"i;";; Creek,and sand Creek.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • December 11, 2012- Board of Supervisors
    THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS ACTION AGENDA SUMMARY DEPT: Chief Executive Office BOARDAGENDA#~*B~-~6~ _ Urgent 0 Routine ~ AGENDA DATE December 11,2012 CEO Concurs with Recommendation YES 4/5 Vote Required YES 0 NO ~ (Infor SUBJECT: Approval to Adopt a Resolution in Support of the Efforts of the California Partnership for the San Joaquin Valley and the Delta Counties Coalition on Water Management Actions of Value to Stanislaus County STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Adopt a Resolution in Support of the Efforts of the California Partnership for the San Joaquin Valley and the Delta Counties Coalition on Water Management Actions of Value to Stanislaus County FISCAL IMPACT: There are no fiscal impacts associated with this item. A member of the Board of Supervisors is appointed by the Governor to represent Stanislaus County on the California Partnership for the San Joaquin Valley. Board members also have an opportunity to become engaged through the work group structure. County staff provides technical support to Board members based on their work and involvement on an as needed basis within approved departmental bUdgets. BOARD ACTION AS FOLLOWS: No. 2012-597 On motion of Supervisor Withrow , Seconded by Supervisor _J;;bi~~q _ and approved by the following-Yote,- ----------------- -. Ayes: Supervisors:_Ct*~~a,_WithJ9w.J1l19_nJeLtb~D_e_ MqaLnj .smd_ C_h_ajCI119Il_ OJ~cieD _ Noes: Supervisors: ~,to_n_~ _ Excused or Absent: Supervisors: None Abstaining: Supervisor: --Nofle--- -----------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • 4.3-1 4.3 HYDROLOGY and WATER QUALITY This Section Describes Water Resources at Pacific Gas and Electric Company's Hydroelect
    4.3 Hydrology and Water Quality 4.3 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY 4.3.1 INTRODUCTION TO HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY This section describes water resources at Pacific Gas and Electric Company’s hydroelectric facilities and associated Watershed Lands in Northern and Central California, and addresses how utilization and management of the water resources for power production affects the physical environment and other beneficial uses. The section provides an overview of discretionary and non- discretionary factors affecting water use and management, including applicable regulatory constraints. The section then addresses the following for each asset: the location of the drainage basin, the flow of water through the different facilities, a general discussion of water quality, physical characteristics of Pacific Gas and Electric Company’s water conveyance systems and capacities, maximum powerhouse capacities, and considerations, including specific regulatory constraints, that affect the management of water for power production and other purposes. Pacific Gas and Electric Company’s hydroelectric facilities were built, for the most part, in the early and mid part of the 20th Century. The existing facilities and their operations are integrated into the water supply system for the State and can affect water quality in the surrounding watershed. 4.3.1.1 Water Use Water is used at Pacific Gas and Electric Company’s hydroelectric facilities primarily for the nonconsumptive purpose of generating electric power. Other uses include minor consumption at powerhouses and recreational facilities (e.g., for drinking water, sanitation, or maintenance activities), provision of recreational opportunities, sale or delivery to other parties, and fish and wildlife preservation and enhancement.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Collections
    A. andersonii A. Gray SANTA CRUZ MANZANITA San Mateo Along Skyline Blvd. between Gulch Road and la Honda Rd. (A. regismontana?) Santa Cruz Along Empire Grade, about 2 miles north of its intersection with Alba Grade. Lat. N. 37° 07', Long. 122° 10' W. Altitude about 2550 feet. Santa Cruz Aong grade (summit) 0.8 mi nw Alba Road junction (2600 ft elev. above and nw of Ben Lomond (town)) - Empire Grade Santa Cruz Near Summit of Opal Creek Rd., Big Basin Redwood State Park. Santa Cruz Near intersection of Empire Grade and Alba Grade. ben Lomond Mountain. Santa Cruz Along China Grade, 0.2 miles NW of its intersection with the Big Basin-Saratoga Summit Rd. Santa Cruz Nisene Marks State Park, Aptos Creek watershed; under PG&E high-voltage transmission line on eastern rim of the creek canyon Santa Cruz Along Redwood Drive 1.5 miles up (north of) from Monte Toyon Santa Cruz Miller's Ranch, summit between Gilroy and Watsonville. Santa Cruz At junction of Alba Road and Empire Road Ben Lomond Ridge summit Santa Cruz Sandy ridges near Bonny Doon - Santa Cruz Mountains Santa Cruz 3 miles NW of Santa Cruz, on upper UC Santa Cruz campus, Marshall Fields Santa Cruz Mt. Madonna Road along summit of the Santa Cruz Mountains. Between Lands End and Manzanitas School. Lat. N. 37° 02', Long. 121° 45' W; elev. 2000 feet Monterey Moro Road, Prunedale (A. pajaroensis?) A. auriculata Eastw. MT. DIABLO MANZANITA Contra Costa Between two major cuts of Cowell Cement Company (w face of ridge) - Mount Diablo, Lime Ridge Contra Costa Immediately south of Nortonville; 37°57'N, 121°53'W Contra Costa Top Pine Canyon Ridge (s-facing slope between the two forks) - Mount Diablo, Emmons Canyon (off Stone Valley) Contra Costa Near fire trail which runs s from large spur (on meridian) heading into Sycamore Canyon - Mount Diablo, Inner Black Hills Contra Costa Off Summit Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Foothill Yellow-Legged Frog Comments
    The Center for Biological Diversity submits the following information for the status review of the foothill yellow-legged frog (Rana boylii) (Docket #FWS-R8-ES-2015-0050), including substantial new information regarding the species' biology, population structure (including potential Distinct Population Segments of the species), historical and recent distribution and status, population trends, documented range contraction, habitat requirements, threats to the species and its habitat, disease, and the potential effects of climate change on the species and its habitat. The foothill yellow-legged frog has experienced extensive population declines throughout its range and a significant range contraction. Multiple threats continue unabated throughout much of the species’ remaining range, including impacts from dams, water development, water diversions, timber harvest, mining, marijuana cultivation, livestock grazing, roads and urbanization, recreation, climate change and UV-radiation, pollution, invasive species and disease. The species warrants listing as threatened under the Endangered Species Act. Contact: Jeff Miller, [email protected] Contents: NATURAL HISTORY, BIOLOGY AND STATUS . .. 2 Biology. .2 Habitat . .. .4 Range and Documented Range Contraction . 4 Taxonomy . 9 Population Structure . 9 Historical and Recent Distribution and Status . 15 Central Oregon . .15 Southern Oregon . 18 Coastal Oregon . .20 Northern Coastal California . 25 Upper Sacramento River . 40 Marin/Sonoma . 45 Northern/Central Sierra Nevada . .47 Southern Sierra Nevada . .67 Central Coast/Bay Area . 77 South Coast. 91 Southern California . .. 94 Baja California, Mexico . .98 Unknown Population Affiliation. .99 Population Trends . .. .103 THREATS. .108 Habitat Alteration and Destruction . .. 108 Dams, Water Development and Diversions . .. .109 Logging . .. .111 Marijuana Cultivation . .. .112 Livestock Grazing . .. .112 Mining . .. .. .113 Roads and Urbanization .
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Flows for Fish Below Dams
    ASSESSING FLOWS FOR FISH BELOW DAMS A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH TO EVALUATE COMPLIANCE WITH CALIFORNIA FISH AND GAME CODE 5937 THEODORE E. GRANTHAM PETER B. MOYLE CENTER FOR WATERSHED SCIENCES UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS ONE SHIELDS AVENUE DAVIS, CA 95616 OCTOBER 22, 2014 This report was prepared by: Theodore E. Grantham and Peter B. Moyle Center for Watershed Sciences University of California, Davis One Shields Avenue Davis, CA 95616 Corresponding author: Theodore (Ted) Grantham [email protected] Copyright ©2014 The Regents of the University of California All rights reserved The University of California prohibits discrimination or harassment of any person on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, pregnancy (including childbirth, and medical conditions related to pregnancy or childbirth), physical or mental disability, medical condition (cancer-related or genetic characteristics), ancestry, marital status, age, sexual orientation, citizenship, or service in the uniformed services (as defined by the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994: service in the uniformed services includes membership, application for membership, performance of service, application for service, or obligation for service in the uniformed services) in any of its programs or activities. University policy also prohibits reprisal or retaliation against any person in any of its programs or activities for making a complaint of discrimination or sexual harassment or for using or participating in the investigation or resolution process of any such complaint. University policy is intended to be consistent with the provisions of applicable State and Federal laws. Please cite this report as: Grantham, T. E. and P. B. Moyle. 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • 20160201 AW W&S Forest Planning
    Dave Steindorf California Stewardship Director 4 Baroni Drive Chico, CA 95928 530-518-2729 www.americanwhitewater.org [email protected] February 1, 2016 U.S. Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region Submitted online via online form Re: Inyo, Sequoia, Sierra National Forest Plan Revisions, Wild and Scenic To Whom It May Concern: American Whitewater appreciates having the opportunity to provide comment on the Draft Wild and Scenic River Evaluation (“Draft Evaluation”) for the Revision of the Inyo, Sequoia and Sierra National Forest Land Management Plans. We write to ensure that the Forest Plan revisions accurately capture the outstandingly remarkable whitewater recreation values on rivers within the three forests. Although American Whitewater provided detailed comments on these values for all three forests during the Forest Assessment phase in 2013, the Draft Evaluation rarely mentions the paddling values of the rivers and streams within the Forests. Through these comments we hope to inform the Forest Service of these values, and we hope to see them reflected in the final evaluation. American Whitewater is a national 501(c)(3) non-profit organization dedicated to conserving and restoring our country’s whitewater resources, and to enhancing opportunities to enjoy them safely. With over 5,800 members and 100 locally based affiliate clubs, we represent the conservation interests of tens of thousands of whitewater enthusiasts across the country. We place high value on protecting naturally functioning river ecosystems, including their fish and wildlife, geomorphic processes and incredible riparian forests. A significant percentage of our members either call the south Sierra home, or travel from across the globe to enjoy the whitewater recreation opportunities that the region provides, including on the rivers of the Inyo, Sierra and Sequoia National Forests.
    [Show full text]
  • John Muir Papers
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt709nf3b8 Online items available Register of the John Muir Papers Ronald H. Limbaugh, Kirsten E. Lewis, Don Walker, and Michael Wurtz Holt-Atherton Department of Special Collections University of the Pacific Library 3601 Pacific Ave. Stockton, CA 95211 Phone: (209) 946-2404 Fax: (209) 946-2942 URL: http://library.pacific.edu/ha © 2008 University of the Pacific. All rights reserved. Register of the John Muir Papers MSS 048 1 Register of the John Muir Papers Collection number: MSS 048 Holt-Atherton Department of Special Collections University of the Pacific Library Stockton, California Processed by: Ronald H. Limbaugh, Kirsten E. Lewis, Don Walker, and Michael Wurtz Date Completed: 2009 Encoded by: Michael Wurtz © 2008 University of the Pacific. All rights reserved. Descriptive Summary Title: John Muir papers Dates: 1849-1957 Collection number: MSS 048 Creator: Muir, John, 1838-1914 Collector: Muir-Hanna Trust Collection Size: 51 linear feet [6581 letters, 242 photographs, 384 drawings, and 78 journals are available online. ] Repository: University of the Pacific. Library. Holt-Atherton Dept. of Special Collections Stockton, California 95211 Abstract: The Muir Papers consists of John Muir's correspondence, journals, manuscripts, notebooks, drawings, and photographs. It also includes some Muir family papers, the William and Maymie Kimes collection of Muir's published writings, the Sierra Club Papers (1896-1913 ), materials collected and generated by his biographers William Badè and Linnie Marsh Wolf, and John Muir's clippings files and memorabilia. http://www.pacific.edu/Library/Find/Holt-Atherton-Special-Collections/Digital-Collections.html Shelf location: For current information on the location of these materials, please consult the library's online catalog.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Wilderness Evaluation for the Inyo, Sequoia, and Sierra National
    Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region December 2015 Draft Results of the Wilderness Evaluation for Public Feedback on Revision of the Inyo, Sequoia, and Sierra National Forests Land Management Plans In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Apr I 2 2004
    .. STATE DEPOSITORY • LAW LIBRARY APR I 2 2004 GOLDEN GAT KFC A 22 • . W750 B9 no. 120 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Arnold Schwarzenegger ,Governor THE RESOURCES AGENCY Mike Chrisman, Secretary for Resources Department of Water Resources Lester A. Snow Director Tom Glover Stephen W. Verigin Gerald E. Johns Deputy Director Acting Chief Deputy Director Acting Deputy Director L. Lucinda Chipponeri Peggy Bernardy Assistant Director for Legislation Chief Counsel Division of Flood Management Stein Buer ................................................................................ Chief, Division of Flood Management Maury Roos ........ ...................................................................................................... State Hydrologist Gary Hester ........................................................................... Chief, Hydrology and Flood Operations Gary B. Bardini .........................................................................................................Chief Forecaster Prepared by Frank Gehrke .....................................................................................................Chief, Snow Surveys Dave Rizzardo .............................................................................................................Engineer, W.R. John King .................................................................................................................... Engineer, W.R. Boone Lek ...................................................................................................................Engineer,
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Wild and Scenic River Evaluation for the Inyo, Sequoia and Sierra National Forests
    Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region December 2015 Draft Wild and Scenic River Evaluation for Public Feedback on Revision of the Inyo, Sequoia and Sierra National Forests Land Management Plans In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • California Highways and Public Works, November-December 1964
    ~..... .. STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDMUND G. BROWN, Governor HIGHWAY TRANSPORTATION AGENCY ROBERT B. BRADFORD Administrator DEPAitTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS JOHN ERRECA, Director FRANK A. CHAMBERS . Chief Deputy Director RUSSELL J. GOONEY . Deputy Director (Management) T. F. BAGSHAW Assistant Director JUSTIN DuCRAY Departmental Management Analyst HARRY D. FREEMAN Deputy Director (Planning) C. RAY VARLEY Assistant Director S. ALAN WHITE Departmental Personnel Officer DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS 1. C. WOMACK State Highway Engineer, Chief of Division CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY COMMISSION J. P. MURPHY Depuly State Highway Engineer Right of way J. A. LE6ARRA Deputy State Highway Engineer RUDOLF HESS Chief Right of Way Agent ROBERT B. BRADFORD Chairman and L. KAGAN Assistant Chief GEO. LANGSNER Deputy State Highway Engineer HARRY Administrator, Highway DEXTER D. MacBRiDE Assistant Chief Agency LYMAN R. GILLIS Assistant State Highway Engineer Transportation R. S. 1. PIANEZZI Assistant Chief J. E. McMAHON Assistant State Highway Engineer ABRAHAM KOFMAN Vice Chairman FRANK E. BAXTER Assistant 5tafe Highway Engineer DistricT 1, Eureka Alameda SAM HELWER District Engineer GEORGE A. HILL Assistant State Highway Engineer JAMES A. GUTHRIE San Bernardino 1. C. BURRILL fompfroller District 2, Redding ROGER S. WOOLLEY San Diego H. S. MILES District Engineer NEAL E. ANDERSEN . Equipment Engineer FRANKLIN S. PAYNE Los Angeles JOHN L. BEATON Materials and Research Engineer nisrricr 3, Marysville WILLIAM S. WHITEHURST . Fresno WARREN District Engineer C. G. BEER Urban Planner W• ~• JOSEPH C. HOUGHTELING Sunnyvale Engineer A. N. DUNNAM Computer Systems District 4, San Francisco Engineer of Design ALVORD C. ESTEP ALAN $. HART District Engineer JOHN ERRECA Administrative Officer Engineer J. F. JORGENSEN Construction R. A.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Significance - Local Agency Bridges March 2019 District 01 Del Norte County Bridge Bridge Name Location Historical Significance Year Number Built
    Structure Maintenance & SM&I Investigations Historical Significance - Local Agency Bridges March 2019 District 01 Del Norte County Bridge Bridge Name Location Historical Significance Year Number Built 01C0001 HOPPOW CREEK 500' E OF RT 101/169 SEP 5. Bridge not eligible for NRHP 1965 01C0002 HOPPOW CREEK WEST OF ROUTE 101/169 SEP 5. Bridge not eligible for NRHP 1965 01C0006 MIDDLE FORK SMITH RIVER 0.05 MI SE JCT SR199 5. Bridge not eligible for NRHP 1956 01C0008 GILBERT CREEK 0.8 MI S OF RT 101 5. Bridge not eligible for NRHP 1947 01C0009 ROWDY CREEK 1.75 MI E OF RTE 101 5. Bridge not eligible for NRHP 1962 01C0010 MIDDLE FORK SMITH RIVER 0.1 MILE N/O RTE 199 5. Bridge not eligible for NRHP 1960 01C0011 HUNTER CREEK 0.1 MI WEST OF RT101 5. Bridge not eligible for NRHP 1949 01C0012 SALT CREEK 0.4 MI WEST OF RTE 101 5. Bridge not eligible for NRHP 1958 01C0015 ROWDY CREEK 1/2 MI S OF RTE 101 5. Bridge not eligible for NRHP 1989 01C0017 JORDAN CREEK 3.7 MI N OF RTE 101 5. Bridge not eligible for NRHP 1954 01C0018 ELK CREEK 0.1 MILE NE/O RTE 199 5. Bridge not eligible for NRHP 1925 01C0020 SALT CREEK 0.1 MI N/O REQUA RD 5. Bridge not eligible for NRHP 1975 01C0022 SHEEP PEN CREEK 0.74 MI S/O SOUTH FORK RD 5. Bridge not eligible for NRHP 1975 01C0032 EIGHTEEN MILE CREEK 5 MI FROM ROUTE 199 5.
    [Show full text]