DOCSLIB.ORG

41022-022: Second Small Towns Water Supply and Sanitation Sector

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
41022-022: Second Small Towns Water Supply and Sanitation Sector Initial Environmental Examination January 2012 NEP: Second Small Towns Water Supply and Sanitation Sector Project- Kakadvitta Town Project Prepared by Department of Water Supply and Sewerage, Ministry of Urban Development for the Asian Development Bank. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 31 January 2012) Currency unit – nepali rupees (NPR) NPR1.00 = $0.0125 $1.00 = NPR79.591 ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank amsl – above mean sea level CMA – Community Medical Auxiliary DI – ductile iron Dia. – diameter DSC – Design and Supervision Consultant DWSS – Department of Water supply and Sewerage EIA – Environmental Impact Assessment EMP – Environmental Management Plan EPA – Environment Protection Act EPR – Environment Protection Rule GI – galvanized iron GoN – Government of Nepal HDPE – high density polyethylene pipe HHs – households IEE – Initial Environmental Examination lpcd – liter per capita per day lps – liters per second MOUD – Ministry of Urban Development NDWQS – National Drinking Water Quality Standard NEA – Nepal Electricity Authority NGO – Non Government Organization Nrs. – Nepali Rupees O&M – operation & maintenance OD – outer diameter PMC – Project Management Consultant PMO – Project Management Office TDF – Town Development Fund VAT – Value Added Tax VDC – Village Development Committee WHO – World Health Organization WSSDO – Water Supply and Sanitation Division Office WUSC – Water User’s and Sanitation Committee NOTES (i) The fiscal year (FY) of the Government of Nepal and its agencies ends on 15 July. “FY” before a calendar year denotes the year in which the fiscal year ends, e.g., FY2011 ends on 15 July 2011. (ii) In this report, "$" refers to US dollars unless otherwise stated. This initial environmental examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Government of Nepal Ministry of Urban Development Department of Water Supply and Sewerage Second Small Towns Water Supply and Sanitation Sector Project Project Management Office Panipokhari, Kathmandu Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) of Kakarvitta Water Supply and Sanitation Sector Project (Batch II, Package IV) Submitted To: Ministry of Urban Development Government of Nepal Singhdurbar, Kathmandu January - 2012 Initial Environment Examination (IEE) of Kakarvitta Water Supply and Sanitation Sector Project TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS …………………………….…………………………………………………………….….iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (Nepali)………………………………..............................……………….………..v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (English)…....……………………………………….……………………………..viii INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................... 1 1. NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE INDIVIDUAL INSTITUTION PREPARING THE REPORT ............................................ 1 a. Name of the Proposal .................................................................................................................................... 1 b. Name and Address of the Proponent ............................................................................................................. 1 c. Consultant Preparing the Report ................................................................................................................... 1 2. BASIS AND EXTENT OF IEE STUDY ..................................................................................................................... 2 a. ADB Policy (ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement, 2009 .............................................................................. 2 b. National Laws, Policies, Acts, Regulations, Standards and Guidelines ...................................................... 3 c. Objectives and Scope of the Environmental Study ........................................................................................ 7 d. Relevancy of the Project ................................................................................................................................ 8 e. Approach and Methodology ........................................................................................................................... 9 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT .................................................................................................................. 12 1. EXISTING WATER SUPPLY, SANITATION AND DRAINAGE INFRASTRUCTURE .................................................. 12 a. Water Supply ................................................................................................................................................ 12 b. Existing Sanitation Situation ....................................................................................................................... 12 c. Drainage and Waste Management .............................................................................................................. 12 2. TYPE, CATEGORY AND NEED OF THE SUBPROJECT .......................................................................................... 13 3. SIZE AND MAGNITUDE OF OPERATION ............................................................................................................. 13 4. PROPOSED SCHEDULE OF IMPLEMENTATION .................................................................................................... 14 5. DESCRIPTION OF THE SUBPROJECTS ................................................................................................................. 14 a. Project Components ..................................................................................................................................... 16 b. Project Requirements ................................................................................................................................... 22 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT ..................................................................................................... 27 1. PHYSICAL RESOURCES ...................................................................................................................................... 27 a. Geophysical Profile ..................................................................................................................................... 27 2. ECOLOGICAL RESOURCES ................................................................................................................................. 28 a. Forest ........................................................................................................................................................... 28 b. Flora ............................................................................................................................................................. 28 c. Fauna ............................................................................................................................................................ 28 3. SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES ............................................................................................................... 29 a. Population and Communities ...................................................................................................................... 29 b. Ethnic Composition ...................................................................................................................................... 29 c. Health Facilities and Sanitation .................................................................................................................. 30 d. Educational Facilities .................................................................................................................................. 30 e. Physical and Cultural Heritage ................................................................................................................... 31 f. Employment ................................................................................................................................................... 31 g. Distribution of Monthly Income Levels ....................................................................................................... 31 4. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PROSPECTS FOR GROWTH ............................................................................. 32 a. Land Use ...................................................................................................................................................... 32 b. Infrastructural Facilities.............................................................................................................................. 32 c. Economic Development ................................................................................................................................ 34 D. ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES .......................... 37 1. BENEFICIAL IMPACTS AND AUGMENTATION MEASURES ................................................................................. 37 a. Construction Phase .....................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Critical Development Constraints Nepal’S Pace of Growth and Poverty Reduction Has Lagged Behind That of Other South Asian Countries
    Nepal: Critical Development Constraints Nepal’s pace of growth and poverty reduction has lagged behind that of other South Asian countries. The country diagnostic study—Nepal: Critical Development Constraints—inquires into the causes for Nepal ’s slow growth vis-à-vis that of other South Asian economies by posing three questions: • What are the critical factors constraining investments, both domestic and foreign? • What should policy makers do to revive investment, particularly by the private sector? • How can the growth be made more inclusive? The inquiry and the results thereof aim to assist the work of government, development agencies, and the private sector to achieve a higher, more equitable growth path to benefit the people of Nepal. About the Asian Development Bank ADB’s vision is an Asia and Pacific region free of poverty. Its mission is to help its developing member countries substantially reduce poverty and improve the quality of life of their people. Despite the region’s many successes, it remains home to two thirds of the world’s poor: 1.8 billion people who live on less than $2 a day, with 903 million struggling on less than $1.25 a day. ADB is committed to reducing poverty through inclusive economic growth, environmentally sustainable growth, and regional integration. Based in Manila, ADB is owned by 67 members, including 48 from the region. Its main instruments Nepal for helping its developing member countries are policy dialogue, loans, equity investments, guarantees, grants, and technical assistance. About the United Kingdom’s Department for International Development Critical One in six people in the world today, almost 1 billion people, live in poverty on less than $1 a day.
    [Show full text]
  • Logistics Capacity Assessment Nepal
    IA LCA – Nepal 2009 Version 1.05 Logistics Capacity Assessment Nepal Country Name Nepal Official Name Federal Democratic Republic of Nepal Regional Bureau Bangkok, Thailand Assessment Assessment Date: From 16 October 2009 To: 6 November 2009 Name of the assessors Rich Moseanko – World Vision International John Jung – World Vision International Rajendra Kumar Lal – World Food Programme, Nepal Country Office Title/position Email contact At HQ: [email protected] 1/105 IA LCA – Nepal 2009 Version 1.05 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Country Profile....................................................................................................................................................................3 1.1. Introduction / Background.........................................................................................................................................5 1.2. Humanitarian Background ........................................................................................................................................6 1.3. National Regulatory Departments/Bureau and Quality Control/Relevant Laboratories ......................................16 1.4. Customs Information...............................................................................................................................................18 2. Logistics Infrastructure .....................................................................................................................................................33 2.1. Port Assessment .....................................................................................................................................................33
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Democratic Republic of Nepal
    FEDERAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF NEPAL MINISTRY OF IRRIGATION MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT FEDERAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF NEPAL NEPAL AGRICULTURE RESEARCH COUNCIL MINISTRY OF IRRIGATION MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT NEPAL AGRICULTUREPREPARATORY RESEARCH SURVEY COUNCIL ON JICA'S COOPERATION PROGRAM FOR AGRICULTUREPREPARATORY AND RURAL SURVEY DEVELOPMENT IN NEPALON JICA'S COOPERATION PROGRAM - FOODFOR AGRICULTURE PRODUCTION ANDAND AGRICULTURERURAL DEVELOPMENT IN TERAI - IN NEPAL - FOOD PRODUCTION AND AGRICULTURE IN TERAI - FINAL REPORT MAIN REPORT FINAL REPORT MAIN REPORT OCTOBER 2013 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY OCTOBER(JICA) 2013 JAPAN INTERNATIONALNIPPON KOEI COOPERATION CO., LTD. AGENCY VISION AND SPIRIT(JICA) FOR OVERSEAS COOPERATION (VSOC) CO., LTD. NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. C.D.C. INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION VISION AND SPIRIT FOR OVERSEAS COOPERATION (VSOC) CO., LTD. 4R C.D.C. INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION JR 13 - 031 FEDERAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF NEPAL MINISTRY OF IRRIGATION MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT FEDERAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF NEPAL NEPAL AGRICULTURE RESEARCH COUNCIL MINISTRY OF IRRIGATION MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT NEPAL AGRICULTUREPREPARATORY RESEARCH SURVEY COUNCIL ON JICA'S COOPERATION PROGRAM FOR AGRICULTUREPREPARATORY AND RURAL SURVEY DEVELOPMENT IN NEPALON JICA'S COOPERATION PROGRAM - FOODFOR AGRICULTURE PRODUCTION ANDAND AGRICULTURERURAL DEVELOPMENT IN TERAI - IN NEPAL - FOOD PRODUCTION AND AGRICULTURE IN TERAI - FINAL REPORT MAIN REPORT FINAL REPORT MAIN REPORT OCTOBER 2013 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL
    [Show full text]
  • A Connectivity-Driven Development Strategy for Nepal: from a Landlocked to a Land-Linked State
    ADBI Working Paper Series A Connectivity-Driven Development Strategy for Nepal: From a Landlocked to a Land-Linked State Pradumna B. Rana and Binod Karmacharya No. 498 September 2014 Asian Development Bank Institute Pradumna B. Rana is an associate professor at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Binod Karmacharya is an advisor at the South Asia Centre for Policy Studies (SACEPS), Kathmandu, Nepal Prepared for the ADB–ADBI study on “Connecting South Asia and East Asia.” The authors are grateful for the comments received at the Technical Workshop held on 6–7 November 2013. The views expressed in this paper are the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of ADBI, ADB, its Board of Directors, or the governments they represent. ADBI does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this paper and accepts no responsibility for any consequences of their use. Terminology used may not necessarily be consistent with ADB official terms. Working papers are subject to formal revision and correction before they are finalized and considered published. “$” refers to US dollars, unless otherwise stated. The Working Paper series is a continuation of the formerly named Discussion Paper series; the numbering of the papers continued without interruption or change. ADBI’s working papers reflect initial ideas on a topic and are posted online for discussion. ADBI encourages readers to post their comments on the main page for each working paper (given in the citation below). Some working papers may develop into other forms of publication. Suggested citation: Rana, P., and B.
    [Show full text]
  • India-Nepal,Kalapani,Nepal,Open Border
    APRIL 2020 ISSUE NO. 356 India and Nepal’s Kalapani Border Dispute: An Explainer SOHINI NAYAK ABSTRACT Neighbours India and Nepal, who share an open border, have not always had the most amicable of relations, oscillating from one extreme to the other. One of their long-standing disputes is over the border area of Kalapani. This discord has the potential to disrupt the other aspects of their ties, especially in the domains of the economy and cross-border security. Further, if the two countries fail to arrive at a resolution to the disagreement, it might give other stakeholders such as China an opportunity to interfere. This brief explains the Kalapani issue and in that context, explores what can be expected of the bilateral relationship in the future. Attribution: Sohini Nayak, “India and Nepal’s Kalapani Border Dispute: An Explainer,” ORF Issue Brief No. 356, April 2020, Observer Research Foundation. Observer Research Foundation (ORF) is a public policy think tank that aims to influence the formulation of policies for building a strong and prosperous India. ORF pursues these goals by providing informed analyses and in-depth research, and organising events that serve as platforms for stimulating and productive discussions. ISBN 978-93-89622-94-2 © 2020 Observer Research Foundation. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, copied, archived, retained or transmitted through print, speech or electronic media without prior written approval from ORF. India and Nepal’s Kalapani Border Dispute: An Explainer INTRODUCTION External Affairs, Nepal, under the leadership of Foreign Minister Pradeep Kumar Gyawali also In November 2019, the Home Ministry of India issued a statement for the media stating that, released a new edition of the Indian political “The Nepal government is committed to map, showing Jammu and Kashmir along with protecting the country’s external borders and it 1 Ladakh as the new union territories of India.
    [Show full text]
  • Revisedindo-Nepal Treaty of Trade Ministry of Commerce
    REVISED INDO-NEPAL TREATY OF TRADE MINISTRY OF COMMERCE & INDUSTRY GOVERNMENT OF INDIA NEW DELHI Oct 2009 1 REVISED TREATY OF TRADE BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL The Government of India and the Government of Nepal (hereinafter referred to as the Contracting Parties), Being conscious of the need to fortify the traditional connection between the markets of the two countries, Being animated by the desire to strengthen economic cooperation between them, Impelled by the urge to develop their economies for their several and mutual benefit, and Convinced of the benefits of mutual sharing of scientific and technical knowledge and experience to promote mutual trade, Have resolved to conclude a Treaty of Trade in order to expand trade between their respective territories and encourage collaboration in economic development, and Have for this purpose appointed as their Plenipotentiaries the following persons, namely, For the Government of India For the Government of Nepal (Anand Sharma) (Rajendra Mahto) Commerce and Minister of Commerce and Industry Minister Supplies Who, having exchanged their full powers and found them good and in due form, have agreed as follows: 2 ARTICLE I The Contracting Parties shall explore and undertake all measures, including technical cooperation, to promote, facilitate, expand and diversify trade between their two countries. ARTICLE II The Contracting Parties shall endeavour to grant maximum facilities and to undertake all necessary measures for the free and unhampered flow of goods, needed by one country from the other, to and from their respective territories. ARTICLE III Both the Contracting Parties shall accord unconditionally to each other treatment no less favourable than that accorded to any third country with respect to (a) customs duties and charges of any kind imposed on or in connection with importation and exportation, and (b) import regulations including quantitative restrictions.
    [Show full text]
  • Removing Roadblocks to Trade
    CASE STUDY Removing Roadblocks to Trade Improving border roads and customs administration can help landlocked countries integrate into regional and global markets. Photo credit: ADB. Nepal has made it easier to move goods across borders by updating customs software, constructing a new inland clearance depot, and rehabilitating border access roads. Published: 23 February 2018 Overview The landlocked country of Nepal faces a challenging geography that not only limits domestic commerce, but also presents a big roadblock to international trade. Nepal’s semi-isolated economy used to be highly dependent on long and challenging transit routes for imports and exports. Trade facilities and transit logistics that could make freight handling and transfers faster and easier were inadequate and inefficient. Customs clearance procedures and other cross-border inspections were cumbersome and time-consuming. The passage of goods was further delayed by the traffic congestion at border crossings and the poor condition of many access roads. Nepal needed to remove these roadblocks by improving its transport system and trade facilities to better integrate into regional and global markets. With half of Nepal’s total border length shared with India, its largest trading partner, much of Nepal’s imports and exports, including those to and from its neighbors Bangladesh and Bhutan, pass through India. India is also Nepal’s top export destination, though its goods reach as far as Europe and North America. Asia, meanwhile, is the major source of Nepal’s imports, but much of this is entrepot trade moving through Singapore and Hong Kong. Nepal also imports goods from the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and the United Arab Emirates.
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal COVID-19 Food Security & Vulnerability Update 2
    Nepal COVID-19 16 April 2020 Food Security & Vulnerability Update 2 their stock. The demand for milk has estimated 30-40% of harvesting complete dropped by an estimated 60% fol- across the country as of 13 April. While no lowing difficulties in accessing mar- major difficulties are thus far reported, kets and consumer anxiety. some concerns about the smooth operation of machinery, such as combine harvesters, Other risk factors to food availability exist as many machine operators are Indi- exist as Indian producers halted rice an nationals who have since returned to exports last week. While Nepal’s India. The Ministry of Agriculture and Live- market stocks are estimated at three stock Development and Provincial counter- months and this news is not cause parts are maintaining a focus on facilitating for immediate concern, the sus- market functioning across the country, tained suspension of rice or other namely the marketing of goods — harvest, food good exports could affect food transportation and storage. The map here security in the country given Nepal’s shows preliminary estimated wheat produc- high dependence on imports: during tion in Nepal based on the CRAFT method- the first 13 days of the lockdown, ology, but using the previous year’s plant- Nepal imported a total of 25,770 MT ing area as an assumption. of food goods from major trade posts in Biratnagar, Birgunj, Kakarbhitta Markets and Bhairahawa. WFP monitors markets in 68 districts across the country through telephone sur- In country food stocks may be veys to assess possible effects of COVID- enough for three months but are not 19 on market health and commodity prices.
    [Show full text]
  • UGDP: ETP) Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized
    Social Management Framework for Urban Governance and Development Program: Public Disclosure Authorized Emerging Towns Project (UGDP: ETP) Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized <Prepared'6y : ~oject Coordination Office ([)epartment ofVr6an ([)eveCopment aM(BuU4i:no Construction !Ministry ofCl'liysicaC(J'{annino aMWo~ Public Disclosure Authorized (Ba6armalia~ %epaC July, 2011 Foreword The Social Management Framework (SMF) was prepared for the Nepal Urban Governance and Development Program: Emerging Town Project (UGDP: ETP) to be implemented by the six municipalities: ltahari, Mehchinagar, Dhankuta, Lekhnath, Baglung and Tansen. The program is being implemented by MLD, Department of Urban Development and Building Construction (DUDBC), Town Development Fund (TDF) and the municipalities under the financial support from the World Bank and the technical support from GIZI SlTNAG program. The SMF was prepared with the participation of all the above agencies and departments, who deserve special thanks for their support and cooperation. I would also like to convey my gratitude to the UGDP: ETP and WB Team members, who were always willing and available to assist in conceptualizing the study framework and approach, developing research tools, accessing relevant documents, and providing helpful insights about different issues and thematic areas that needed to be covered under the study. I am particularly thankful to Mr. Hari Prasad Bhattarai, Associate Professor of Anthropology, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu who prepared this document. My special thanks are also due to Mr. Puma Kadariya, Secretary, MPPW, Mr. Ashok Nath Upreti, Director General, DUDBC; Mr. Reshmi Raj Pandey, Joint Secretary, Ministry of Local Development; Mr. Sushi I Gyewali, Executive Director, Town Development Fund; Mr. Prakash Raghubanshi, Sr.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Management Framework for Urban Governance
    Environmental Management Framework for Urban Governance and Development Program: Emerging Towns Project (UGDP: ETP) Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized €Preparelf6y : Project Coordination Office (j)epartment ofVr6an (j)eveCopment and(]3ui{cfing Construction :Jvtinistry ofPliysica{Pfanning andWor~ Public Disclosure Authorized (]3a6armaliaf, :JVepa{ Public Disclosure Authorized July, 2011 Foreword The Environmental Management Framework (EMF) was prepared for the Nepal Urban Governance and Development Program: Emerging Towns Project (UGDP: HP) to be implemented by the six municipalities: Itahari, Mehchinagar, Dhankuta, Lekhnath, Baglung and Tansen. The program is being implemented by MLD, Department of Urban Development and Building Construction (DUDBC), Town Development Fund (TDF) and the municipalities under the financial support from the World Bank and the technical support from GIZ/ SUNAG program. The SMF was prepared with the participation of all the above agencies and departments, who deserve special thanks for their support and cooperation. I would also like to convey my gratitude to the UGDP and WB Team members, who were always willing and available to assist in conceptualizing the study framework and approach, developing research tools, accessing relevant documents, and providing helpful insights about different issues and thematic areas that needed to be covered under the study. I am particularly thankful to Mr. Salil Devkota, Environment Safeguard Consultant who assisted us in preparing this document. My special thanks are also due to Mr. Purna Kadariya, Secretary, MPPW, Mr. Ashok Nath Upreti, Director General; DUDBC; Mr. Reshmi Raj Pandey, Joint Secretary, Ministry of Local Development; Mr. Sushil Gyawali, Executive Director, Town Development Fund; Mr. Govinda Bahadur Karki, Under Secretary, and Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Saath-Saath Project
    Saath-Saath Project Saath-Saath Project THIRD ANNUAL REPORT August 2013 – July 2014 September 2014 0 Submitted by Saath-Saath Project Gopal Bhawan, Anamika Galli Baluwatar – 4, Kathmandu Nepal T: +977-1-4437173 F: +977-1-4417475 E: [email protected] FHI 360 Nepal USAID Cooperative Agreement # AID-367-A-11-00005 USAID/Nepal Country Assistance Objective Intermediate Result 1 & 4 1 Table of Contents List of Acronyms .................................................................................................................................................i Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................ 1 I. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 4 II. Program Management ........................................................................................................................... 6 III. Technical Program Elements (Program by Outputs) .............................................................................. 6 Outcome 1: Decreased HIV prevalence among selected MARPs ...................................................................... 6 Outcome 2: Increased use of Family Planning (FP) services among MARPs ................................................... 9 Outcome 3: Increased GON capacity to plan, commission and use SI ............................................................ 14 Outcome
    [Show full text]
  • Master Plan of Agricultural Marketing in Eastern Development Region of Nepal
    MASTER PLAN OF AGRICULTURAL MARKETING IN EASTERN DEVELOPMENT REGION OF NEPAL Final Report Submitted To Government of Nepal Ministry of Agricultural Development Department of Agriculture Agri. Business Promotion & Marketing Development Directorate (ABPMDD) Harihar Bhawan, Lalitpur Submitted By: Business Promotion Research and Communication Pvt. Ltd., (BPRC) Putalisadak, Kathmandu, Nepal Tel # 0977-01-4442853/4436617, Fax # 0977-01-4436617 Post Box # 19006, Email # [email protected] July 2017 (Ashad, 2074) Preface BPRC is pleased to undertake this Study "Master Plan of Agri-Marketing in Eastern Development Region of Nepal". BPRC expresses its gratitude to Agri Business Promotion and Marketing Development Directorate (ABPMDD) to having entrusted this important task. It also expresses gratitude to Mr. Laxman Prasad Paudel, Program Director and his team for expert guidance and for providing suggestions throughout the study period and report writing. BPRC is also thankful to ABDMDD team for their valuable, constructive comments and suggestions which were provided during Inception report and draft report presentations. We also express graduate to Senior Agriculture Marketing Officers Mr. Rajendra Prasad Pradhan and Mr. Puspa Raj Shahi for providing necessary instructions during final report preparation. BPRC acknowledges with gratitude the contribution made by study team of the project, with their valuable contribution the project was successfully brought to its conclusion. BPRC is most grateful to Mrs. Naina Dhakal, Team Leader for the successful execution of this project and for steering the whole tasks of conducting field study till its conclusion. In addition, BPRC conveys its appreciation to the contribution made by Chief and SMS of District Agriculture Development Offices, Agro-Vets, Traders, Wholesalers, Representative of District Development Committee, Member of Market Management Committee, Commercial Farmers Representatives and Agri-Cooperatives etc.
    [Show full text]