DOCSLIB.ORG

Exomars Science Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Exomars Science Management Plan Recommendation for the Narrowing of ExoMars 2018 Landing Sites Ref: EXM-SCI-LSS-ESA/IKI-004 Version 1.0, 1 October 2014 The ExoMars 2018 Landing Site Selection Working Group (LSSWG): F. Westall (CNRS, Orléans, F), H. G. Edwards (Bradford Univ. UK), L. Whyte (McGill Univ. CAN), A. G. Fairén (Cornell Univ. USA), J.-P. Bibring (IAS, Orsay, F), J. Bridges (Univ. of Leicester, UK), E. Hauber (DLR, Berlin, D), G. G. Ori (IRSPS, Pescara, ITA), S. Werner (Univ. of Oslo, N), D. Loizeau (Univ. Lyon, F), R. Kuzmin (Vernadzky Inst. Moscow, RUS), R. M. E. Williams (PSI, Tucson, USA), J. Flahaut (VUAmsterdam, NL), F. Forget (LMD, Paris, F), J. L. Vago (ESA), D. Rodionov (IKI, Moscow, RUS), O. Korablev (IKI, Moscow, RUS), O. Witasse (ESA), G. Kminek (ESA), L. Lorenzoni (ESA), O. Bayle (ESA), L. Joudrier (ESA), V. Mikhailov (TsNIIMASH, Moscow, RUS), A. Zashirinsky (Lavochkin, Moscow, RUS), S. Alexashkin (Lavochkin, Moscow, RUS), F. Calantropio (TAS-I, Tori- no, ITA), and A. Merlo (TAS-I, Torino, ITA). 1 Table of Contents 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................................... 5 2 DOCUMENT SCOPE AND INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Scope ............................................................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................... 6 3 LANDING SITE SELECTION PROCESS .............................................................................................................. 8 3.1 Landing Site Selection Working Group ............................................................................................................ 8 3.2 Call for ExoMars 2018 Landing Site Proposals ............................................................................................... 9 3.3 First ExoMars 2018 Landing Site Selection Workshop ................................................................................... 9 3.4 LSS Schedule and Next Steps ...................................................................................................................... 10 4 SCIENTIFIC CONSTRAINTS .............................................................................................................................. 12 4.1 Rover Surface Mission ................................................................................................................................... 12 4.2 Surface Platform Surface Mission ................................................................................................................. 12 4.3 Landing Site Scientific Constraints ................................................................................................................ 12 4.3.1 Depositional Age of Terrain..................................................................................................................... 12 4.3.2 Preservation of Organics ......................................................................................................................... 13 4.3.3 Aqueous History ...................................................................................................................................... 13 4.3.4 Availability and Distribution of Outcrops ................................................................................................. 13 4.3.5 Paucity of Dust Coverage ....................................................................................................................... 13 5 ENGINEERING CONSTRAINTS ......................................................................................................................... 14 5.1 EDL Engineering Constraints and Performance Drivers ............................................................................... 14 5.1.1 Landing Elevation .................................................................................................................................... 14 5.1.2 Local Time and Season .......................................................................................................................... 14 5.1.3 Landing Ellipse Size and Orientation ...................................................................................................... 14 5.1.4 Terrain Relief and Slopes ........................................................................................................................ 15 5.1.5 Rock Distribution ..................................................................................................................................... 16 5.1.6 Radar Reflectivity .................................................................................................................................... 16 5.1.7 Atmospheric Parameters ......................................................................................................................... 17 5.2 Rover Engineering Constraints and Design Capability ................................................................................. 17 5.2.1 Mobility System Description .................................................................................................................... 17 5.2.2 Latitude.................................................................................................................................................... 18 5.2.3 Surface Thermophysical Properties ........................................................................................................ 18 5.2.4 Traverse Range and Rover velocity ........................................................................................................ 18 5.2.5 Static Stability and Slope Access ............................................................................................................ 19 5.2.6 Surface Winds ......................................................................................................................................... 19 5.3 Preliminary Summary Tables for Engineering Constraints ............................................................................ 20 6 PLANETARY PROTECTION CONSTRAINTS .................................................................................................... 22 6.1 Mars Special Regions .................................................................................................................................... 22 6.2 References ..................................................................................................................................................... 22 7 PROPOSED LANDING SITES ............................................................................................................................ 23 7.1 Introduction to the Candidate Landing Sites .................................................................................................. 23 7.2 A Note Concerning Site Description and Age Determination ........................................................................ 25 7.2.1 References .............................................................................................................................................. 27 7.3 General Atmospheric Conditions for the 2019 Landing ................................................................................. 28 7.3.1 Expected Atmospheric Dust Loading ...................................................................................................... 28 7.3.2 Horizontal Winds ..................................................................................................................................... 29 7.3.3 Vertical Winds ......................................................................................................................................... 33 7.4 General Atmospheric Conditions for the 2021 Landing ................................................................................. 34 7.4.1 Expected Atmospheric Dust Loading ...................................................................................................... 34 2 7.4.2 Horizontal Winds ..................................................................................................................................... 34 7.4.3 Vertical Winds ......................................................................................................................................... 34 7.5 Mawrth Vallis.................................................................................................................................................. 36 7.5.1 Global Context ........................................................................................................................................ 36 7.5.2 Regional Context ..................................................................................................................................... 37 7.5.3 Topography and Morphology .................................................................................................................. 37 7.5.4 Mineralogy ............................................................................................................................................... 37 7.5.5 Ages .......................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Eastern Outlet of Valles Marineris: a Window Into the Ancient Geologic and Hydrologic Evolution of Mars
    First Landing Site/Exploration Zone Workshop for Human Missions to the Surface of Mars (2015) 1054.pdf The Eastern Outlet of Valles Marineris: A Window into the Ancient Geologic and Hydrologic Evolution of Mars Stephen M. Clifford, David A. Kring, and Allan H. Treiman, Lunar and Planetary Institute/USRA, 3600 Bay Area Bvld., Houston, TX 77058 Over its 3,500 km length, Valles Marineris exhibits enormous range of geologic and environmental diversity. At its western end, the canyon is dominated by the tectonic complex of Noctis Labyrinthus while, in the east, it grades into an extensive region of chaos - where scoured channels and streamlined islands provide evidence of catastrophic floods that spilled into the northern plains [1-4]. In the central portion of the system, debris derived from the massive interior layered deposits of Candor, Ophir and Hebes Chasmas spills into the central trough have been identified as possible lucustrine sediments that may have been laid down in long-standing ice-covered lakes [3-6]. The potential survival and growth of Martian organisms in such an environment, or in the aquifers whose disruption gave birth to the chaotic terrain at the east end of the canyon, raises the possibility that fossil indicators of life may be present in the local sediment and rock. In other areas, 6 km-deep exposures of Hesperian and Noachian-age canyon wall stratigraphy have collapsed in massive landslides that extend many tens of kilometers across the canyon floor. Ejecta from interior craters, aeolian sediments, and possible volcanics (which appear to have emanated from structurally controlled vents along the base of the scarps), further contribute to the canyon's geologic complexity [2,3].
    [Show full text]
  • Mawrth Vallis, Mars: a Fascinating Place for Future in Situ Exploration
    Mawrth Vallis, Mars: a fascinating place for future in situ exploration François Poulet1, Christoph Gross2, Briony Horgan3, Damien Loizeau1, Janice L. Bishop4, John Carter1, Csilla Orgel2 1Institut d’Astrophysique Spatiale, CNRS/Université Paris-Sud, 91405 Orsay Cedex, France 2Institute of Geological Sciences, Planetary Sciences and Remote Sensing Group, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany 3Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA. 4SETI Institute/NASA-ARC, Mountain View, CA, USA Corresponding author: François Poulet, IAS, Bâtiment 121, CNRS/Université Paris-Sud, 91405 Orsay Cedex, France; email: [email protected] Running title: Mawrth: a fascinating place for exploration 1 Abstract After the successful landing of the Mars Science Laboratory rover, both NASA and ESA initiated a selection process for potential landing sites for the Mars2020 and ExoMars missions, respectively. Two ellipses located in the Mawrth Vallis region were proposed and evaluated during a series of meetings (3 for Mars2020 mission and 5 for ExoMars). We describe here the regional context of the two proposed ellipses as well as the framework of the objectives of these two missions. Key science targets of the ellipses and their astrobiological interests are reported. This work confirms the proposed ellipses contain multiple past Martian wet environments of subaerial, subsurface and/or subaqueous character, in which to probe the past climate of Mars, build a broad picture of possible past habitable environments, evaluate their exobiological potentials and search for biosignatures in well-preserved rocks. A mission scenario covering several key investigations during the nominal mission of each rover is also presented, as well as descriptions of how the site fulfills the science requirements and expectations of in situ martian exploration.
    [Show full text]
  • Cata Alogue E 68
    Grosvenor Prints 19 Shelton Street Covent Garden London WC2H 9JN Tel: 020 7836 1979 Fax: 020 7379 6695 E-mail: [email protected] www.grosvenorprints.com Dealers in Antique Prints & Books Catalogue 68 February Listing Item 369: The Grand Master or Adventures of Qui Hi? in Hindostan All items listed are illustrated on our web site: www.grosvenorprints.com Registered in England No. 1305630 Registered Office: 2, Castle Business Villlage, Station Roaad, Hampton, Middlesex. TW12 2BX. Rainbrook Ltd. Directors: N.C. Talbot. T.D.M. Rayment. C.E. Elliis. E&OE VAT No. 217 6907 49 Stock: 43657 4. [Wax and Candle Invoice.] Bo.t of W. & J. Barton, Wax & Tallow Chandlers, No. 26 Bishopsgate with opposite Threadneedle Street. [1834.] Engraved invoice with manuscript; pt watermark (18)32. Sheet: 125 x 200mmm (5 x 8"). Folds and creasing. £75 An invoice for candles and sooap from chandlers W. & J. Barton based in Bishopsgate. Stock: 43660 5. [Horses] R. Thwaiites, Ripon. To the 1. Design Adopted by the Council for the following places on Pleasure with a Pair of Univerity of London. Horses and Waiting [...] William Wilkins, M.A. R.A. Arch.t 1826. Printed by C. Smith & Greaves sc Birmingham [c.1820] Hullmandel. Engraving, sheet 65 x 100mm (2½ x 4"). Trimmed. Lithograph. Sheet 260 x 320mm (10¼ x 12½"). mss ''D' £60 added top right, some soiling. £190 Billhead for a man based in Ripon, Yorkshire, with The designs by William Wilkins RA (1778-1839) for horses for hire. With unicorn vignette and list of the main building of what is now University College distances to nearby towns.
    [Show full text]
  • Télécharger Notre Brochure Voyages Individuels
    Voyages Individuels 100 destinations sur 4 continents Asie | Océanie | Afrique | Moyen-Orient | Amérique Latine 2019-2020 Un Monde de Sensations Sensations vous présente sa brochure entièrement dédiée aux 103 destinations que nous vous proposons de découvrir en voyage individuel, de l’Asie à l’Australie, du Pacifique à l’Amérique Latine de l’Afrique au Moyen-Orient ! Sommaire 2 Une équipe, 15 ans de passion! 4 Voyager en Individuel 3 Sensations, c’est aussi... 5 ASIE OCEANIE MOYEN-ORIENT Arménie 8 Australie 160-163 Egypte 138-143 Bhoutan 24 Nouvelle-Zélande 164 Iran 156 Birmanie 54 Polynésie française 166 Israël 146 Cambodge 60-63 Jordanie 148 Chine 26 AFRIQUE Liban 150 Corée du Sud 36 Afrique du Sud 92-97 Maroc 144 Géorgie 10 Botswana 84 Oman 152-155 Indonésie 44-49 Cap Vert 104-107 Inde 18-21 Ethiopie 66 AMERIQUE LATINE Japon 30-35 Kenya 68-71 Argentine 132 Laos 56 Madagascar 98-101 Bolivie 126 Malaisie et Hong Kong 38 Namibie 86 Brésil 128-131 Malaisie Bornéo 40 Ouganda 78-81 Chili 134 Mongolie 28 Rwanda 82 Colombie 116 Népal 22 Sénégal 102 Costa Rica 112-115 Ouzbékistan 12 Tanzanie 72-77 Equateur 118-121 Philippines 42 Zimbabwe 88-91 Mexique 110 Sri Lanka 14-17 Pérou 122-125 Thaïlande 50-53 Vietnam 58-61 2 www.travel-sensations.com Avec son approche créative, Sensations s’est imposé rapidement comme le spécialiste du voyage sur mesure. Notre équipe se tient à votre disposition pour élaborer et réaliser de bout en bout le voyage qui vous correspond. Parce que l’on voyage tous différemment, votre projet mérite d’être personnalisé comme il se doit.
    [Show full text]
  • Atmospheric Dust on Mars: a Review
    47th International Conference on Environmental Systems ICES-2017-175 16-20 July 2017, Charleston, South Carolina Atmospheric Dust on Mars: A Review François Forget1 Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique (LMD/IPSL), Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, PSL Research University, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Université Paris-Saclay, Ecole Polytechnique, CNRS, Paris, France Luca Montabone2 Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique (LMD/IPSL), Paris, France & Space Science Institute, Boulder, CO, USA The Martian environment is characterized by airborne mineral dust extending between the surface and up to 80 km altitude. This dust plays a key role in the climate system and in the atmospheric variability. It is a significant issue for any system on the surface. The atmospheric dust content is highly variable in space and time. In the past 20 years, many investigations have been conducted to better understand the characteristics of the dust particles, their distribution and their variability. However, many unknowns remain. The occurrence of local, regional and global-scale dust storms are better documented and modeled, but they remain very difficult to predict. The vertical distribution of dust, characterized by detached layers exhibiting large diurnal and seasonal variations, remains quite enigmatic and very poorly modeled. Nomenclature Ls = Solar Longitude (°) MY = Martian year reff = Effective radius τ = Dust optical depth (or dust opacity) CDOD = Column Dust Optical Depth (i.e. τ integrated over the atmospheric column) IR = Infrared LDL = Low Dust Loading (season) HDL = High Dust Loading (season) MGS = Mars Global Surveyor (NASA spacecraft) MRO = Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (NASA spacecraft) MEX = Mars Express (ESA spacecraft) TES = Thermal Emission Spectrometer (instrument aboard MGS) THEMIS = Thermal Emission Imaging System (instrument aboard NASA Mars Odyssey spacecraft) MCS = Mars Climate Sounder (instrument aboard MRO) PDS = Planetary Data System (NASA data archive) EDL = Entry, Descending, and Landing GCM = Global Climate Model I.
    [Show full text]
  • Origin of Circular Collapsed Landforms in the Chryse Region of Mars ⇑ Manuel Roda A,B, , Maarten G
    Icarus 265 (2016) 70–78 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Icarus journal homepage: www.journals.elsevier.com/icarus Origin of circular collapsed landforms in the Chryse region of Mars ⇑ Manuel Roda a,b, , Maarten G. Kleinhans b, Tanja E. Zegers b, Rob Govers b a Universitá degli Studi di Milano, Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Via Mangiagalli, 34, 20133 Milano, Italy b Universiteit Utrecht, Faculty of Geosciences, Heidelberglaan 2, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands article info abstract Article history: The quasi-circular collapsed landforms occurring in the Chryse region of Mars share similar morpholog- Received 29 June 2015 ical characteristics, such as depth of collapse and polygonally fractured floors. Here, we present a statis- Revised 20 October 2015 tical analysis of diameter, maximum and minimum depth, and amount of collapse of these features. Accepted 21 October 2015 Based on their morphometric characteristics, we find that these landforms have a common origin. In par- Available online 27 October 2015 ticular, the investigated landforms show diameter-depth correlations similar to those that impact craters of equivalent diameters exhibit. We also find that the observed amount of collapse of the collected fea- Keywords: tures is strongly correlated to their diameter. Furthermore, the linear relation between minimum filling Geological processes and pristine depth of craters, the constant ratio between collapse and the amount of filling and the frac- Ices Impact processes tured and chaotic aspect of the filling agree with melting and subsequent collapse of an ice layer below a Mars, surface sediment layer. This interpretation is consistent with a buried sub-ice lake scenario, which is a non-climatic mechanism for producing and storing abundant liquid water under martian conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Widespread Crater-Related Pitted Materials on Mars: Further Evidence for the Role of Target Volatiles During the Impact Process ⇑ Livio L
    Icarus 220 (2012) 348–368 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Icarus journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/icarus Widespread crater-related pitted materials on Mars: Further evidence for the role of target volatiles during the impact process ⇑ Livio L. Tornabene a, , Gordon R. Osinski a, Alfred S. McEwen b, Joseph M. Boyce c, Veronica J. Bray b, Christy M. Caudill b, John A. Grant d, Christopher W. Hamilton e, Sarah Mattson b, Peter J. Mouginis-Mark c a University of Western Ontario, Centre for Planetary Science and Exploration, Earth Sciences, London, ON, Canada N6A 5B7 b University of Arizona, Lunar and Planetary Lab, Tucson, AZ 85721-0092, USA c University of Hawai’i, Hawai’i Institute of Geophysics and Planetology, Ma¯noa, HI 96822, USA d Smithsonian Institution, Center for Earth and Planetary Studies, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA e NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA article info abstract Article history: Recently acquired high-resolution images of martian impact craters provide further evidence for the Received 28 August 2011 interaction between subsurface volatiles and the impact cratering process. A densely pitted crater-related Revised 29 April 2012 unit has been identified in images of 204 craters from the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter. This sample of Accepted 9 May 2012 craters are nearly equally distributed between the two hemispheres, spanning from 53°Sto62°N latitude. Available online 24 May 2012 They range in diameter from 1 to 150 km, and are found at elevations between À5.5 to +5.2 km relative to the martian datum. The pits are polygonal to quasi-circular depressions that often occur in dense clus- Keywords: ters and range in size from 10 m to as large as 3 km.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Catalysis of the Hydrological Cycle: Life's Thermodynamic Function
    Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 8, C1907–C1919, Hydrology and 2011 Earth System www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci-discuss.net/8/C1907/2011/ Sciences © Author(s) 2011. This work is distributed under Discussions the Creative Commons Attribute 3.0 License. Interactive comment on “Biological catalysis of the hydrological cycle: life’s thermodynamic function” by K. Michaelian K. Michaelian karo@fisica.unam.mx Received and published: 2 June 2011 Complete response to Prof. Schymanski: General Comments In a preliminary response to Prof. Schymanski and the anonymous referee (Michaelian, 2011a), I clarified that my paper neither invokes, nor requires, the “maximum entropy production principle”. The paper simply associates Onsager’s principle (1931) of the coupling of irreversible processes, and the associated increase in entropy production, with the evidence (e.g. Zotin, 1984) for an increase in the amount of coupling of irre- versible biotic processes over the history of life on Earth. The hypothesis of my paper C1907 is that biological irreversible processes also couple with abiotic irreversible processes, in particular, that biology catalyzes the hydrological cycle. This coupling augments the global entropy production of Earth in its solar environment, in accordance with Onsager’s principle. I also suggested in my preliminary response that the particular history of Earth with regard to entropy production would depend very much on par- ticular initial conditions (even microscopic), the kinetics (dependent on the particular forces) and subsequent external perturbations (even microscopic). This dependence arises because the Earth system under the solar photon flux is non-linear and out of equilibrium (Prigogine, 1972). Prof. Schymanski asks; 1) ”What is the mechanism that selects for biota that contribute more to planetary entropy production over such that contribute less but invest more e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Formation of Aromatum Chaos, Mars: Morphological Development As a Result of Volcano-Ice Interactions Harald J
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 111, E08071, doi:10.1029/2005JE002549, 2006 Formation of Aromatum Chaos, Mars: Morphological development as a result of volcano-ice interactions Harald J. Leask,1 Lionel Wilson,1 and Karl L. Mitchell1,2 Received 3 August 2005; revised 10 May 2006; accepted 16 May 2006; published 17 August 2006. [1] Morphological examination of the Aromatum Chaos depression on Mars supports earlier suggestions that it is a site of cryosphere disruption and release of pressurized water trapped in an underlying aquifer. We infer that the cause of cryosphere disruption was intrusion of a volcanic sill, confined laterally by earlier intruded dikes, and consequent melting of ice by heat from the sill. The vertical extents and displacements of blocks of terrain on the floor of the depression, together with an estimate of the cryosphere thickness, constrain the vertical extent of ice melting and hence the thickness of the sill (100 m) and the depth at which it was intruded (2–5 km). At least 75% of the volume of material removed from Aromatum Chaos must have been crustal rock rather than melted ice. Water from melted cryosphere ice played a negligible role in creating the depression, the process being dominated by released aquifer water. For sediment loads of 30–40% by volume, 10,500–16,500 km3 of aquifer water must have passed through the depression to carry away rock as entrained sediment and erode the associated Ravi Vallis channel. These required water volumes are 2–3 times larger than the amount of water that could reasonably be contained in aquifers located beneath the area of incipiently collapsed ground to the west of Aromatum Chaos and suggest a much larger water source.
    [Show full text]
  • March 21–25, 2016
    FORTY-SEVENTH LUNAR AND PLANETARY SCIENCE CONFERENCE PROGRAM OF TECHNICAL SESSIONS MARCH 21–25, 2016 The Woodlands Waterway Marriott Hotel and Convention Center The Woodlands, Texas INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT Universities Space Research Association Lunar and Planetary Institute National Aeronautics and Space Administration CONFERENCE CO-CHAIRS Stephen Mackwell, Lunar and Planetary Institute Eileen Stansbery, NASA Johnson Space Center PROGRAM COMMITTEE CHAIRS David Draper, NASA Johnson Space Center Walter Kiefer, Lunar and Planetary Institute PROGRAM COMMITTEE P. Doug Archer, NASA Johnson Space Center Nicolas LeCorvec, Lunar and Planetary Institute Katherine Bermingham, University of Maryland Yo Matsubara, Smithsonian Institute Janice Bishop, SETI and NASA Ames Research Center Francis McCubbin, NASA Johnson Space Center Jeremy Boyce, University of California, Los Angeles Andrew Needham, Carnegie Institution of Washington Lisa Danielson, NASA Johnson Space Center Lan-Anh Nguyen, NASA Johnson Space Center Deepak Dhingra, University of Idaho Paul Niles, NASA Johnson Space Center Stephen Elardo, Carnegie Institution of Washington Dorothy Oehler, NASA Johnson Space Center Marc Fries, NASA Johnson Space Center D. Alex Patthoff, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Cyrena Goodrich, Lunar and Planetary Institute Elizabeth Rampe, Aerodyne Industries, Jacobs JETS at John Gruener, NASA Johnson Space Center NASA Johnson Space Center Justin Hagerty, U.S. Geological Survey Carol Raymond, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Lindsay Hays, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Paul Schenk,
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of Ecological Memory for Trophic Rewilding As an Ecosystem Restoration Approach
    Biol. Rev. (2019), 94,pp.1–15. 1 doi: 10.1111/brv.12432 The importance of ecological memory for trophic rewilding as an ecosystem restoration approach 1,2,4 1,3 1,2 Andreas H. Schweiger ∗ , Isabelle Boulangeat , Timo Conradi , Matt Davis1,4 and Jens-Christian Svenning1,4 1Section for Ecoinformatics and Biodiversity, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 114, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark 2Plant Ecology, Bayreuth Center for Ecology and Environmental Research (BayCEER), University of Bayreuth, 95440, Bayreuth, Germany 3University Grenoble Alpes, Irstea, UR LESSEM, 2 rue de la Papeterie-BP 76, F-38402, St-Martin-d’H`eres, France 4Center for Biodiversity Dynamics in a Changing World (BIOCHANGE), Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 114, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark ABSTRACT Increasing human pressure on strongly defaunated ecosystems is characteristic of the Anthropocene and calls for proactive restoration approaches that promote self-sustaining, functioning ecosystems. However, the suitability of novel restoration concepts such as trophic rewilding is still under discussion given fragmentary empirical data and limited theory development. Here, we develop a theoretical framework that integrates the concept of ‘ecological memory’ into trophic rewilding. The ecological memory of an ecosystem is defined as an ecosystem’s accumulated abiotic and biotic material and information legacies from past dynamics. By summarising existing knowledge about the ecological effects of megafauna extinction and rewilding across a large range of spatial and temporal scales, we identify two key drivers of ecosystem responses to trophic rewilding: (i) impact potential of (re)introduced megafauna, and (ii) ecological memory characterising the focal ecosystem. The impact potential of (re)introduced megafauna species can be estimated from species properties such as lifetime per capita engineering capacity, population density, home range size and niche overlap with resident species.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Research Online Oro.Open.Ac.Uk
    Open Research Online The Open University’s repository of research publications and other research outputs Oxia Planum: The Landing Site for the ExoMars “Rosalind Franklin” Rover Mission: Geological Context and Prelanding Interpretation Journal Item How to cite: Quantin-Nataf, Cathy; Carter, John; Mandon, Lucia; Thollot, Patrick; Balme, Matthew; Volat, Matthieu; Pan, Lu; Loizeau, Damien; Millot, Cédric; Breton, Sylvain; Dehouck, Erwin; Fawdon, Peter; Gupta, Sanjeev; Davis, Joel; Grindrod, Peter M.; Pacifici, Andrea; Bultel, Benjamin; Allemand, Pascal; Ody, Anouck; Lozach, Loic and Broyer, Jordan (2021). Oxia Planum: The Landing Site for the ExoMars “Rosalind Franklin” Rover Mission: Geological Context and Prelanding Interpretation. Astrobiology, 21(3) For guidance on citations see FAQs. c 2020 Cathy Quantin-Nataf et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Version: Version of Record Link(s) to article on publisher’s website: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1089/ast.2019.2191 Copyright and Moral Rights for the articles on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. For more information on Open Research Online’s data policy on reuse of materials please consult the policies page. oro.open.ac.uk ASTROBIOLOGY Volume 21, Number 3, 2021 Research Article Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. DOI: 10.1089/ast.2019.2191 Oxia Planum: The Landing Site for the ExoMars ‘‘Rosalind Franklin’’ Rover Mission: Geological Context and Prelanding Interpretation Cathy Quantin-Nataf,1 John Carter,2 Lucia Mandon,1 Patrick Thollot,1 Matthew Balme,3 Matthieu Volat,1 Lu Pan,1 Damien Loizeau,1,2 Ce´dric Millot,1 Sylvain Breton,1 Erwin Dehouck,1 Peter Fawdon,3 Sanjeev Gupta,4 Joel Davis,5 Peter M.
    [Show full text]