DOCSLIB.ORG

CASE NUMBER: 13/2010 DATE of HEARING: 10 JUNE 2010 VRYHEIDSFRONT PLUS and OTHERS COMPLAINANTS Vs E-Tv RESPONDENT TRIBUNAL

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CASE NUMBER: 13/2010 DATE of HEARING: 10 JUNE 2010 VRYHEIDSFRONT PLUS and OTHERS COMPLAINANTS Vs E-Tv RESPONDENT TRIBUNAL CASE NUMBER: 13/2010 DATE OF HEARING: 10 JUNE 2010 VRYHEIDSFRONT PLUS AND OTHERS COMPLAINANTS vs e-tv RESPONDENT TRIBUNAL: PROF HP VILJOEN (DEPUTY CHAIRPERSON) MS Z MBOMBO MS M NKWANE PROF G OLIVIER Complainant: Adv A Alberts and Clr Franco de Lange of the Vryheidsfront Plus. Respondent: Attorneys Dan Rosengarten and David Feinberg, presenter Debra Patta, Complaints Executive Bop Tshweu, Devon Koen, Jnr Producer, 3rd Degree ________________________________________________________________________ Complaints about programme investigating racial relations in South Africa, especially on the campus of the Free State University- matter settled through negotiations between the parties- complaints withdrawn -Vryheidsfront Plus & Others vs e-tv, Case No: 13/2010(BCTSA). ________________________________________________________________________ SUMMARY This matter dealt with complaints about a “3rd Degree” programme investigating racial relations in South Africa, especially on the campus of the Free State 2 University. The matter was settled through negotiations between the parties and the complaints were withdrawn. _______________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT PROF HP VILJOEN [1] Various complaints were received from the Freedom Front Plus and others after the broadcasting of a “3rd Degree” programme during which the state of racial relations in South Africa and especially on the campus of the Free State University was investigated. The BCCSA received the following complaints. [2] Vryheidsfront Plus: INSAKE: KLAGTE TEEN e.TV, die Vervaardigers van die aktualiteitsprogram ‘3rd Degree’ en me Deborah Patta, die joernalis en aanbieder van die Program Die Vryheidsfront Plus van Suid Afrika wil hiermee ‘n formele klag teen bogenoemde partye (die “Verweerders”) lê, spesifiek soos hieronder uiteengesit. 1. Uitsaai Inligting: 1.1. Program: 3rd Degree 1.2. Kanaal: e.TV 1.3. Dag: Dinsdag 25 Mei 2010 1.4. Tyd: 21:30 2. Feite: Die Program het gehandel oor rasse-verhoudinge in Suid-Afrika. Die VF Plus se klag het spesifiek betrekking op die insetsel rakende die studente politiek op die Universiteit van die Vrystaat (UV) kampus en in dié verband plaas ons ‘n spesifieke klem op die behandeling van die VF Plus studenteleier van die UV kampus en vise-president van die Studenteraad, me Chrisna De Kock (hierna die “Student”), deur die joernalis, me Deborah Patta (hierna die “Joernalis”). Daar dien daarop gelet te word dat die Joernalis en haar span by die UV kampus opgedaag het met plakkate wat by verskeie plekke op die kampus ten toon gestel is. Hierdie plakkate was van twee tipes, naamlik 3 een wat gelees het “Proud to be Black” en ‘n ander wat gelees het “Proud to be White”. Hierdie plakkate se tentoonstelling het die onderhoude voorafgegaan. Daar dien ook daarop gelet te word dat die UV kampus die afgelope twee jaar deur ‘n polities onstuimige tydperk gegaan het weens rassepolarisasie. Die situasie het egter heelwat verbeter tot en met die Joernalis en haar span die tersaaklike onderhoude kom voer het. 3. Klagte: Die Uitsaaikode van toepassing in casu is die Gratis Lugtydkode. Daar dien daarop gelet te word dat hierdie dokument bloot die klagtes uiteensit en dat verdere argumente ter stawing voor die verhoor geliasseer sal word. Derhalwe, in terme van hierdie Kode word die volgende klagtes teen die Verweerders as volg gevestig: 3.1. Artikel 14 – Geweld Ar tikel 14(ii) verbied, onder andere, dat geweld gesanksioneer en gepromoveer mag word. In dié verband is die grondslag van die klag as volg: 3.1.1. Die Joernalis het die UV kampus genader met vooropgestelde idees en met die bedoeling om ‘n sensitiewe omgewing te polariseer en rassegroepe teen mekaar af te speel wat blyk gemotiveer te wees uit ‘n behoefte om sensasionele TV-materiaal te skep; 3.1.2. Die Joernalis het die Student genader met verkeerde (wat sou dui op naltigheid) en/of vals inligting (wat sou dui op ‘n opsetsbewussyn) tot haar beskikking en met ‘n bevooroordeelde houding wat nie daarop gerig was om die waarheid te vind en weer te gee nie; 3.1.3. Die Joernalis het intimiderend, aggressief en neerbuigend teenoor die Student opgetree; 3.1.4. Die Joernalis het die Student geisoleer deur haar te omring met studente wat nie noodwendig haar standpunte deel nie; 3.1.5. Die Joernalis het nie die Student genoegsame geleentheid gegee om haar standpunt te verdedig nie deur haar kort- kort haar op ‘n aggressiewe wyse te onderbreek; 3.1.6. Sy het die student tot so ‘n mate geteister en geintimideer dat sy die Student tot trane gedwing het; 4 3.1.7. Die vervaardiger het die Program met bogenoemde inhoud saamgestel; en 3.1.8. e.TV het die intimiderende en dreigende onderhoud uitgesaai;derhalwe het die Verweerders by wyse van emosionele teistering, intimidasie en aggressie, vanaf ‘n bevooroordeelde ingesteldheid, emosionele geweld teenoor die Student gepleeg en sodoende ook geweld gesanksioneer en gepromoveer. Ons submiteer in die verband dat geweld nie fisies hoef te wees nie, net soos die strafregtelike misdryf van ‘aanranding’ nie fisies hoef te wees nie. 3.2. Artikel 15 – Geweld teen Vroue Artikel 15(i) verbied, onder andere, die sanksionering en promovering van geweld teen vroue. Soos bo uiteengesit, het die Verweerders emosionele geweld toegepas op die vroulike Student en ook die Program so saamgestel en uitgesaai, en sodoende geweld teen vroue gesanksioneer en gepromoveer. Die oortreding word nog verder beaam deur die vriendelike en rustige wyse waarop die ander manlike studenteleier deur die Joernalis behandel is. 3.3. Artikel 16 – Geweld en Haatspraak teen Spesifieke Groepe Artikel 15(i) verbied, onder andere, die sanksionering en promovering van geweld gebaseer op, onder andere, ras, nasionaliteit, etniese oorsprong, kleur ens. Ons submiteer dat: 3.3.1. Die Joernalis se bevooroordeeldheid en feite-dwalings en/of opsetlike leuens ten aansien van rassisme teenoor die Student en die Vryheidsfront Plus as politieke party wat Afrikaners verteenwoordig; 3.3.2. Die Joernalis se intimiderende, aggressiewe en neerbuigende houding jeens die Student as ‘n lid van die Afrikanergemeenskap en as persoon wat stry vir die veilige en vreedsame voortbestaan van dié minderheidsgroep binne Suid-Afrika; 3.3.3. Deur die toepassing van emosionele geweld teenoor die Student as ‘n lid van die Afrikanergemeeskap; en 3.3.4. In die lig van die ander faktore bo vermeld, die Verweerders geweld en teen Afrikaners op grond van ras, 5 en etniese oorsprong gepleeg, gesanksioneer en gepromoveer het. Verder, ingevolge Artikel 16.3(c) word uitsaaiers verbied om programme uit te saai wat haat promoveer op grond van ras, etnisiteit ens, en wat aanhitsing tot geweld daarstel. Ons submiteer dat weens die faktore vermeld in Artikels 14, 15 en 16, en die feit dat Afrikaners wat die VF Plus ondersteun getipeer word as rassisties en onverdraagsaam en hulle dus uitgesonder word vir intimiderende gedrag en aggressie, soos vergestalt deur die Joernalis, die Verweerders wel ook hierdie artikel verbeek. Die Verweerders skep die oorwegende indruk dat dit in orde sou wees om Afrikaners met minagting, sielkundige geweld en selfs uiteindelik fisieke geweld te straf. 3.4. Artikel 35 – Kommentaar Artikel 35(ii) vereis dat kommentaar gebaseer sal word op ‘n eerlike uitdrukking van opinie, en dat dit duidelik as kommentaar getipeer word, en laastens dat dit gebaseer word op feite. Gegewe die volgende: 3.4.1. Dat die Joernalis met ‘n voorafopgestelde plan van polarisasie ter wille van sensasie die onderhoude op die UV kampus kom voer het; 3.4.2. Dat die Joernalis die Student kort-kort onderbreek het sodat die ander kant van die saak nie aangehoor kon word nie; 3.4.3. Dat die Joernalis die Student sodanig geintimideer en emosioneel geteister het dat die Student begin huil het en die ander kant van die saak derhalwe nie aangehoor kon word nie; 3.4.4. Dat die Joernalis op onware inligting staatgemaak het soos, onder andere, dat die VF Plus ‘n rassistiese politieke party is en dus by implikasie ‘n party is wat contra die beginsels van die Grondwet van Suid-Afrika bestaan en funksioneer, asook dat al sy lede rassiste is; 3.4.5. Dat die Joernalis in die algemeen alle grense van behoorlike joernalistieke etiek oorskry het;submiteer ons dat die Joernalis se uitdrukking van opinie oneerlik was én dat dit gebaseer was op onware inligting. 6 3.5. Artikel 36 – Kontroversiele Kwessies van Publieke Belang Artikel 36.1 stel dit dat in die bespreking van kontroversiele kwessies van publieke belang, dit belangrik is dat opponerende opinies verkry word. Voorts stel Artikel 36.2 dit dat wanneer iemand se sieninge in ‘n program gekritiseer word, daardie persoon ‘n reg tot repliek het om haar.sy kant van die saak te stel. Gegewe die volgende: 3.5.1. Dat die Joernalis die Student kort-kort onderbreek het sodat die ander kant van die saak nie aangehoor kon word nie; 3.5.2. Dat die Joernalis die Student sodanig geintimideer en emosioneel geteister het dat die Student begin huil het en die ander kant van die saak derhalwe nie behoorlik aangehoor kon word nie;het die Verweerders Artikel 36.2 verbreek. 3.6. Artikel 38 – Privaatheid (Eer/Integriteit(Dignitas)) Artikel 38 bepaal dat insoverre dit nuus en kommentaar betref, daar besondere versigtigheid aan die dag gelê moet word in sake rakende die eer en privaatheid van individue. Gegewe die volgende: 3.6.1. Dat die Joernalis, gebaseer op feite-dwalings en/of opsetlike leuens, die Student as ‘n rassis getipeer het; 3.6.2. Dat die Joernalis nie die Student ‘n behoorlike geleentheid gegee het om te reageer en haar saak te stel nie; 3.6.3. Dat die Joernalis haar posisie van mag misbruik het om die Student te intimideer en tot trane te dryf; het die Verweerders, sonder enige gronde, die eer en integriteit van die Student aangetas. 3.7. Algemeen Ons wil dit ook duidelik stel dat, alhoewel die Kode nie spesifiek daarna verwys as ‘n klag-grondslag nie, dat ons die Joernalis se optrede en die vervaardiging van die Progam, asook die uitsaai daarvan, beskou as ‘n algehele oorskryding van joernalistieke etiek en ‘n growwe skending van me De Kock, Afrikaners en die VF Plus se regte soos beliggaam in Hoofstuk 2 van die Grondwet van Suid-Afrika.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • International Criminal Court, the Hague
    INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, THE HAGUE NOTICE OF COMPLAINT ITO ART.15 OF ROME STATUTE COMPLAINANTS: RADICAL HONESTY – SA First Complainant LARA JOHNSTONE Second Complainant POLITICAL TRC FRAUD DEFENDANTS: DESMOND TUTU First Defendant ALEX BORAINE Second Defendant NELSON MANDELA Third Defendant NELSON MANDELA FOUNDATION Fourth Defendant F.W. DE KLERK Fifth Defendant F.W. DE KLERK FOUNDATION Sixth Defendant NORWEGIAN NOBEL COMMITTEE Seventh Defendant SANDILE NGCOBO Eighth Defendant DIKGANG MOSENEKE Ninth Defendant EDWIN CAMERON Tenth Defendant JOHAN FRONEMAN Eleventh Defendant CHRIS JAFTA Twelfth Defendant SISI KHAMPEPE Thirteenth Defendant MOGOENG MOGOENG Fourteenth Defendant BESS NKABINDE Fifteenth Defendant JOHANN VAN DER WESTHUIZEN Sixteenth Defendant ZAK JACOOB Seventeenth Defendant ZA MEDIA TRC FRAUD DEFENDANTS ACCESSORIES: SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL EDITORS FORUM (SANEF) First Accessory MONDLI MAKHANYA Second Accessory JOE THLOLOE Third Accessory RALPH ZULMAN Fourth Accessory JOHAN RETIEF Fifth Accessory SOUTH AFRICAN PRESS ASSOCIATION (SAPA) Sixth Accessory MARK VAN DER VELDEN Seventh Accessory BUSINESS DAY Eighth Accessory PETER BRUCE Ninth Accessory BUSINESS REPORT Tenth Accessory JABULANI SIKHAKHANE Eleventh Accessory CAPE ARGUS Twelfth Accessory CHRIS WITFIELD Thirteenth Accessory CAPE TIMES Fourteenth Accessory ALIDE DASNOIS Fifteenth Accessory CITY PRESS Sixteenth Accessory FERIAL HAFFAJEE Seventeenth Accessory THE CITIZEN Eighteenth Accessory MARTIN WILLIAMS Nineteenth Accessory DAILY DISPATCH Twentieth Accessory ANDREW TRENCH
    [Show full text]
  • From the Editor Contents
    Volume 4. Quarter 4. 2012. EMI newsletter Contents From The Editor Welcome to the fourth edition of the Inspector, the official quarterly From The Editor 1 newsletter of the Environmental Management Inspectorate. Legally Speaking 2 All Rise In Court 3 This edition marks the end of the first year of the Inspector, as we Strategic Inspections 4 continue our efforts of establishing this newsletter as a key Take Note 4 NECEF 5 communication tool to connect Environmental Management Inspectors Media Briefing 6 and other important role players across national, provincial and local Gala Dinner 6 government institutions. Training Day 7 Excursions 8 Along with our usual newsletter features, we bring you information on a Debora Patta 8 number of successful prosecutions during the last quarter, as well as Stakeholder Discussion 9 important judicial guidance for EMIs to take into account in the drafting Workshop Discussion s 10 and execution of search warrants. EMI Institutions’ Feedback 11 Nice To Meet You 12 We also bring you extensive coverage of the fourth Environmental Nice To Meet You Too 12 Compliance and Enforcement Lekgotla (ECEL), hosted by the Nice To Meet You Three 13 Department of Environmental Affairs and held in Polokwane. Half a In Memory Of A Good Man 13 decade since the creation of the Inspectorate, the main objective of this On A Lighter Lekgotla Note 14 event was to discuss topics of general interest, develop capacity and Hot Off The Press 15 adopt strategies to tackle the current challenges facing the environmental compliance and enforcement sector. I would like to take this opportunity to thank all those officials who assisted in the organisation and hosting of the ECEL, as well as all the attendees who contributed in making this event a success.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 SAIIA Highlights Brochure
    Telephone : +27 (0) 11 339 202 Fax : +27 (0) 11 339 254 Web : www.saiia.org.za SAIIA_cover.indd 2-3 3/10/10 12:56:22 PM OUR VISION OUR MISSION To be the pre-eminent think-tank on Africa To provide cutting-edge analysis and promote and on global issues as they affect Africa. balanced dialogue on issues crucial to Africa’s advancement and its engagement in a dynamic global context. CONTENTS Message from the National Chairman, Fred Phaswana, and the National Director, Elizabeth Sidiropoulos 2 Profi le of the Organisation 4 Key Objectives 2009 6 Outputs 7 75th Anniversary 8 Travel 10 Collaboration with other Organisations 12 SAIIA’s Research Agenda 14 Governance and Democracy 14 South African Foreign Policy and African Drivers 16 Great Powers and Africa 18 Economic Diplomacy 20 Global Governance and Sustainable Development 22 Financial Statements 24 Funding 25 the skill to convince often suspicious or sceptical stakeholders about how our research helps policy makers to arrive at better decisions, and ultimately better lives for all. Think tanks have to be at the cutting-edge of the world’s biggest challenges – war and insecurity, poverty and marginalisation, and to provide answers and options on how best to fi ght these through collaboration across borders and without regard to narrow self-interest. We would argue that this responsibility is even greater for think thanks in Africa because the stakes on rolling back war and reducing poverty are so much higher. It was a great honour for SAIIA to be ranked the top think tank in sub-Saharan Africa in 2009 in the annual think tank survey conducted by the University of Pennsylvania.
    [Show full text]
  • Compiled Speaker Bios
    HEALTHCARE OF THE FUTURE : THE GOOD , THE BAD & THE NANO ? MEDIA ROUND TABLE – 9 FEBRUARY 2011 SPEAKER INFORMATION Ms Debora Patta - Facilitator Debora Patta is currently Executive Producer and anchor of Third Degree – South Africa’s top rated current affairs programme. She is famous for her no-holds barred interviewing style and for her tough uncompromising journalism. Debora is a multi- award winning journalist who was recently honoured with the Vodacom Media Woman of the Year. She has covered virtually every major story both locally and internationally over the past 20 years. 1990 marked her first foray into journalism working as a production assistant for the BBC. She then joined Radio 702 and worked her way through the ranks as an overnight producer, reporter and News Editor. In 1998 she joined South Africa’s first independent free-to-air channel where she has carved a career both on-air and in management. In 2001 she conceived and launched Third Degree. In 2005 she was appointed Editor-in-Chief for e.news and was part of the team that turned around the company’s news ratings and headed the team that launched South Africa’s first independent 24hr news channel in 2008. Debora has covered stories ranging from Nelson Mandela’s presidency to 9/11, the Gulf Wars, Princess Di’s death and the Obama election. She has co-authored two books and is married with two daughters. Mr Matlho JJ Molapisi, Department of Science and Technology Email: [email protected] ; Tel: 012 843 6460 Matlho is the Director of the Emerging Research Areas at the Department of Science and Technology (DST).
    [Show full text]
  • Global and Local Narratives of the South African General Elections
    DESPERATELY SEEKING DEPTH: Global and local narratives of the South African general elections on television news, 1994 – 2014 By Bernadine Jones Town Cape Thesis presentedof for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY at the Centre for Film and Media Studies UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN UniversityAugust 2017 1 The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Published by the University of Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University of Cape Town Declaration of own work and publications This thesis is my own work, conducted in Cape Town, South Africa between January 2014 and August 2017. I confirm that I have been granted permission by the University of Cape Town’s Doctoral Degrees Board to include the following publication(s) in my PhD thesis: Jones, B. 2016. Television news and the digital environment: a triadic multimodal approach for analysing moving image media, in African Journalism Studies 37(2): 116-137 2 Acknowledgements What respectable body of work would be complete without expressing ones gratitude to those who have helped carry the author – mind, soul, and sometimes body – through the wilderness of research and analysis? It stands to reason then that I convey my utmost appreciation for my two supervisors, Drs Martha Evans and Wallace Chuma, for guiding me along this path with infinite patience, wisdom, and maddening attention to detail without which I would flounder.
    [Show full text]
  • Law Review 5.Fm
    RACE AND RAC(IAL)ISM, THE POLITICS OF PEACE AND FRIENDSHIP IN A LIBERAL CONSTITUTION NEW REFLECTIONS OR OLD WINE IN NEW BOTTLES? A CRITICAL ANALYSIS by J Modiri* 1Introduction Figure 1 & 2: Lithographs by Anton Kannemeyer (bitterkomix)1 The context of this article is a two-part investigative documentary on ‘race’ as an enduring fault line in South African politics on etv’s 3rd * Joel S M Modiri, first year LLB student, University of Pretoria. My thanks to Professors Anton Kok, Duard Kleyn and Karin van Marle for incisive comments and illuminating discussions. I must also thank Ms Lorette Arendse for inputs and editorial suggestions to the final draft of this article. 1 In these prints Anton Kannemeyer has focused on images from his Alphabet of Democracy series. 43 (2010) 4 Pretoria Student Law Review 44 degree (2010)2 programme as well as a true-life drama, For One Night (2006)3 which explores a 30-year old ‘tradition’ of racially segregated school dances in southern American states. The events detailed in both shows resonate strongly with the essence of this article in that they both publicly engage with and challenge pre-existing ideas about race and racialism and depict ordinary citizens having to be confronted by the ongoing uneasiness of race in their daily lives. On 3rd degree, students at University of the Free State (UFS), spoke honestly about the challenges of racism they face at UFS, on campus and in the residences. On For One Night, conservative white families had to come to terms with the possibility of their children mingling with their black counterparts at the traditionally segregated school dance for the first time in 30 years.
    [Show full text]
  • State Department News Clips
    United States Department of State Washington, D. C. 20520 October 10, 2018 Case No.: F-201 8-00529, F-2018-00827, F-2018-01063, & F-201 8-01467 Michael Bekesha, Esq. Judicial Watch, Inc. 425 Third Street, S.W., Suite 800 Washington, D.C. 20024 Dear Mr. Bekesha: I refer you to our letter dated September 12, 2018, regarding the review of certain Department of State material under the Freedom oflnformation Act (the "FOIA"), 5 U.S.C. § 552. The review of potentially responsive records is ongoing and has resulted in the retrieval of nine documents responsive to your request. After reviewing these documents, we have determined that seven may be released in full and two may be released in part. All released material is enclosed. Where a document has been released to you in part, all non-exempt material that is reasonably segregable from the exempt material has been released. Where we have made excisions, the applicable exemptions are marked on the document. An enclosure provides information on FOIA exemptions and other grounds for withholding material. We will keep you advised as your case progresses. If you have any questions, you may contact Trial Attorney Damon William Taaffe at (202) 252-2544 or damon.taaffe@usdoj. gov. Please refer to the case numbers cited above and the civil action number, l 8-cv-968, in all correspondence regarding this case. c~Sincerely, eeunan~ Chief, Programs and Polici 1v1s10n Office of Information Programs and Services Enclosures: As stated The Freedom of Information Act (5 USC 552) FOIA Exemptions (b)(1) Information specifically authorized by an executive order to be kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy.
    [Show full text]
  • CASE NUMBER: 60/2012 DATE of HEARING: 28 NOVEMBER 2012 JUDGMENT RELEASE DATE: 14 DECEMBER 2012 AGULHAS COMPLAINANT Vs Toptv
    CASE NUMBER: 60/2012 DATE OF HEARING: 28 NOVEMBER 2012 JUDGMENT RELEASE DATE: 14 DECEMBER 2012 AGULHAS COMPLAINANT vs TopTV RESPONDENT TRIBUNAL: PROF JCW VAN ROOYEN SC (CHAIRPERSON) ADV B MMUSINYANE PROF S LÖTTER (CO-OPTED) The Complainant was invited but was unable to attend. For the Respondent: Mmabatho Kau, Channel Manager: Top ONE accompanied by Elvis Mudau, Programme Acceptance Officer. ________________________________________________________________________ Religion – satire not denigrating Jesus and not amounting to hate speech based on religion – Agulhas vs TopTV Case No: 60/2012(BCCSA). ______ __________________________________________________________________ SUMMARY The Registrar received a complaint concerning an insert in a news programme that, inter alia, consists of humorous and satirical perspectives of the news by way of puppets resembling the characters portrayed. Given the sensitive nature of one of the items, which satirised a recently discovered fourth-century Coptic text stating that Jesus had been married, the matter was referred to a Tribunal. The Tribunal held that the item did not qualify as hate speech based on religion, as defined in the Code. The Tribunal reasoned as follows: The TopTV news item does not denigrate Jesus. In fact, the Jesus puppet remains silent when his “wife” accuses him of poor wine-making, messing in the bathroom while trying to walk on water and that he should tell Mary Magdalene to stop calling him. The “wife” is portrayed as a modern-day woman who smokes and drinks; she is also a foolish, nagging wife. Nothing that she says in the programme is in any way impressive. It is in fact she who is the object of the satire.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloads Just Aren't What They Used to Be”
    The columnist as trickster: satire and subversion in literary journalism. GREIG DOUGLAS Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of the requirements for the degree of Magister Artium in the Faculty of Arts at the Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, January 2012. Supervisor: Dr M L Crous Co-supervisor: Prof L Hibbert Table of Contents Page. i. Abstract. PART 1: A self-reflexive essay examining the complicity of South African satire in the perpetuation of white normativity. 1. Introduction 1 2. Satire, whiteness and related concepts. 4 3. Background to The Weekly Crab. 3.1: Positioning. 8 3.2: Audience. 11 4. A critique of Hayibo. 12 5. A critique of The Weekly Crab. 26 6. Conclusion. 37 7. Bibliography. 39 PART 2: The Weekly Crab (editions 1 to 13) as a creative, countertextual response to instances of white normativity in mainstream South African satire. i. Abstract. This project examines facets of racial identity as they emerge in a contemporary South African context, and considers how instances of local satire both subtly resist and support white normativity. It consists of two separate sections: firstly, a self-reflective essay that, employing current theories from the academic field of whiteness studies, assesses South African satire’s relation to and negotiation of race and identity politics; and secondly, The Weekly Crab, my own creative response to the genre of satire. Using contemporary theories of racial construction, the first section will delineate whiteness as a dominant but invisible identification, and as a social construction underpinned by an inherited and continually reproduced privilege.
    [Show full text]
  • Children of Fire Charity Takes on E.Tv's Patta
    PRETORIA NEWS 3 TUESDAY AUGUST 11 2009 News Children of Fire charity takes on e.tv’s Patta Trust’s founder wants R5m, says she was defamed in a 3rd Degree programme HANTI OTTO for R2 million for damages to her charity’s care. The programme also asked Jones why 1 200 victims of neglected children and exploited the COURT REPORTER reputation. alleged that Jones handed out fires in Johannesburg that year did goodwill and generosity of the pub- Patta and e.tv have until Thurs- expired food. not receive blankets. Jones replied lic for personal gain. HE CHILDREN of Fire day to respond. Patta started the programme, that they were not asked for 1 200 In addition, it feared that the pub- Trust and its founder are e.tv spokesman Vasili Vass con- saying: “With blankets, food or blankets. lic would believe Children of Fire suing e.tv and Debora firmed that they had received the money, South Africans are known The court papers quoted Patta: was lying and collected charitable Patta of the programme summons and would defend it in for their generosity. A generosity, in “That is a complete bald-faced lie. donations under false pretence. T3rd Degree for R5 million court. the case of tonight’s story, that was You were supposed to distribute The additional “sting” was that after alleged defamatory pro- Children of Fire takes care of sadly abused (by Jones and/or Chil- them”, and, later in the programme: the charity was inefficient, could grammes were aired in August and burn victims by supplying medical dren of Fire).” “You are lying again.
    [Show full text]
  • 2030 Conversations
    1 2030 Conversations “Ladies and gentlemen, fellow South Africans, I do know one thing for sure: when 2030 does finally come along, there will still be rainbows arching over the horizons of our beautiful and beloved land as a sign of hope. May God richly bless South Africa’s future. Nkosi Sikelel' iAfrika.” Opening Address by Archbishop Desmond Tutu, 6 May 2010 By the South African Chapter of the World Future Society © World Future Society of South Africa www.wfs-sa.com June 2010 2 The 2030 Painting By Charlene Maslamoney © World Future Society of South Africa www.wfs-sa.com June 2010 3 Table of Contents The 2030 Painting 2 Foreword 4 Introduction to 2030 Conversations 5 Starting the Journey to South Africa of 2030 8 Conversations about the First Future Pillar: Ethos 10 Conversations about the Second Future Pillar: Education 15 Conversations about the Third Future Pillar: Economics 17 Conversations about the Fourth Future Pillar: Environment 21 Conversations about the Fifth Future Pillar: Energy 27 Conversations about Problem-Solving and Measuring Future Progress 34 Future Dreams to Explore 39 Conclusion 40 © World Future Society of South Africa www.wfs-sa.com June 2010 Foreword 4 “2030 Conversations” is about applying futures thinking to an analysis of South Africa’s prospects in the time period 2010-2030. Its purpose is to inspire knowledge-based plans and strategies aimed at creating favourable conditions for the nation’s emerging future up to 2030. The paper records the key themes, messages and information shared at a conference organised by the South African Chapter of the World Future Society entitled “Energy, Environment, Education and Economics: Imagineering South Africa’s Future to 2030” which was held at the Pavilion Centre, V & A Waterfront, Cape Town, on 6-7 May, 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Focus 50 Editions
    FOCUS EDITORIAL DOn’T SQUANDER OR By Raenette Taljaard MISUSE MANDELA’S LEGACY elson Mandela’s 90th birthday is both a poignant their own countries, we denigrate the very essence of moment in history and a time to reflect on one man’s long walk to freedom, and what it represents Ncurrent political trends in South Africa to our entire global village. We celebrate Mandela’s crowning achievements, It is incumbent on the leaders of all political parties but simultaneously have to ask ourselves as a country in South Africa and the rest of us, not to render a what we intend to do with his legacy. Mandela himself squandered legacy to Madiba on his 90th birthday and in recent months has asked tough questions of the new beyond. It is our duty to demand values-based leadership leadership group and, in the wake of the spate of violent with as certain a true north as Madiba’s – freedom and a attacks on foreigners and South Africans alike, called for better life for all. It is our duty to demand sound ethics of a renewed commitment to unity on Youth Day. our political representatives, and to restore an awareness The Nelson Mandela Foundation has also in recent that public life means public duty, not opportunity for weeks made key statements about actions that violate personal aggrandisement and the pursuit of wealth either democracy, freedom or human rights. Theirs is a through public office. It is our duty as a nation to remind crucial voice that aims to link the values of Mandela to ourselves that Madiba’s long walk towards a rights-based our ongoing journey towards a consolidated democracy dispensation was a walk in the knowledge that we have a in South Africa, now in its 14th year.
    [Show full text]