From the Editor Contents

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

From the Editor Contents Volume 4. Quarter 4. 2012. EMI newsletter Contents From The Editor Welcome to the fourth edition of the Inspector, the official quarterly From The Editor 1 newsletter of the Environmental Management Inspectorate. Legally Speaking 2 All Rise In Court 3 This edition marks the end of the first year of the Inspector, as we Strategic Inspections 4 continue our efforts of establishing this newsletter as a key Take Note 4 NECEF 5 communication tool to connect Environmental Management Inspectors Media Briefing 6 and other important role players across national, provincial and local Gala Dinner 6 government institutions. Training Day 7 Excursions 8 Along with our usual newsletter features, we bring you information on a Debora Patta 8 number of successful prosecutions during the last quarter, as well as Stakeholder Discussion 9 important judicial guidance for EMIs to take into account in the drafting Workshop Discussion s 10 and execution of search warrants. EMI Institutions’ Feedback 11 Nice To Meet You 12 We also bring you extensive coverage of the fourth Environmental Nice To Meet You Too 12 Compliance and Enforcement Lekgotla (ECEL), hosted by the Nice To Meet You Three 13 Department of Environmental Affairs and held in Polokwane. Half a In Memory Of A Good Man 13 decade since the creation of the Inspectorate, the main objective of this On A Lighter Lekgotla Note 14 event was to discuss topics of general interest, develop capacity and Hot Off The Press 15 adopt strategies to tackle the current challenges facing the environmental compliance and enforcement sector. I would like to take this opportunity to thank all those officials who assisted in the organisation and hosting of the ECEL, as well as all the attendees who contributed in making this event a success. The true measure of success, however, is in the implementation, and we hope that officials will be inspired to continue to build on the achievements of the first five years of the Environmental Management Inspectorate. Ziyaad Hassam Ziyaad Hassam Environmental Management Inspectorate Newsletter Volume 4, March 2012 Legally Speaking WASTEMAN HOLDINGS (PTY) LTD v MINISTER OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS The Department of Environmental Affairs (DEA), the KZN Provincial Department and Ethekwini Municipality received complaints from residents and community leaders in the Chatsworth area regarding the dumping of unauthorised waste on the Bulbul Drive Landfill site of Wasteman - a waste disposal company which collects and disposes of medical waste for their clients. On 9 February 2011, DEA applied for, and was granted a search and seizure warrant in respect of the Bulbul landfill site. The warrant was executed on 10 February 2011, after which Wasteman brought an application to set aside the search warrant on the grounds that it was unlawful, alternatively seeking to review and set aside the decision to authorise the search warrant on the basis that a proper case had not been placed before the Magistrate in the affidavit in respect of which the application was made. The application was heard in the Durban High Court on 14 June 2011 and judgement handed down on 20 December 2011, wherein the court ruled in favour of the applicant, in so doing, ordering that the search warrant that was issued on the 9 February be set aside, and further that all documents and objects seized and samples taken pursuant to the execution of the search warrant be returned to the applicants. The implications of this judgement should serve as critical judicial guidance to EMIs when applying for search warrants. For a search warrant to be valid, it must fulfill the test of being drafted in a “reasonably intelligible manner”, which includes the following: The statutory provision in terms of which the warrant has been issued; Identity of the person/s who will conduct the search; The legislative authority given to the searcher; Identity of the person, container or premises to be searched; Description of the article to be searched for and seized; Details of the offence/s which triggered the criminal investigation; Names of the suspected offender/s. For a copy of the full judgement, please contact Ziyaad Hassam at [email protected]. S v AESTHETIC WASTE SERVICES (PTY) LTD During July 2009, DEA received a complaint that Heath Care Risk Waste ("HCRW") was being stored unlawfully at a location in Butterworth, Eastern Cape. The complaint was followed up and a site investigation was executed by EMIs from DEA and the Eastern Cape Provincial Department, who discovered a large amount of HCRW being stored on site. As is often the case in matters of this nature, the area smelled of rotten and decaying human flesh and posed a threat to both human health and the environment. A criminal investigation was then undertaken by DEA. During January 2010, further complaints were received and investigated by officials from the Eastern Cape Provincial Department, and a further criminal case was opened against the company and its directors. The various contraventions were thereafter collated for trial purposes and the matter was heard in February 2012 at the Butterworth Regional Court. The accused was charged with contravention of section 20(1) of the Environmental Conservation Act (operating a waste disposal site without a license); and section 35(2) of the National Environmental Management: Air Quality Act (failure to take reasonable steps to prevent the emission of noxious and offensive odours). The company, represented by Mr. Nakin (a director) pleaded guilty on both counts and was sentenced to a fine of R200 000 suspended for 5 years. Compiled by Eugene Swart & Heloise van Schalkwyk 2 Environmental Management Inspectorate Newsletter Volume 4, March 2012 All Rise In Court SUMMARY OF BIODIVERSITY CONVICTIONS S v I Maluleke and two others - Case Number: RP 101/11, Phalaborwa Regional Court (Prosecutor J Manzini) Whilst on patrol, game rangers found a freshly dehorned rhino carcass. They followed footprints found near the crime scene and heard shots being fired, after which they found and arrested four people lying underneath some bushes. The arrested persons had in their possession rhino horns, two rifles, ammunition and two axes. One of the arrested persons later died. The remaining three accused all pleaded guilty on the following four counts: hunting of rhino (count 1), possession of a prohibited firearm, being an AK47 (count 2), possession of a rifle (count 3), and possession of ammunition (count 4). They were all sentenced to 10 years imprisonment or R100 000 fine on count 1, 15 years imprisonment on count 2, 8 years imprisonment on count 3 and 15 years imprisonment on count 4, with counts 2 and 4 to run concurrently. S v ES Sigauque – Case Number: SH 45/2010, Mokopane Regional Court (Prosecutor D Lamminga) After hearing a gunshot early in the morning, a Limpopo farm manager and trackers found a dehorned rhino, which had been shot with an R5 firearm. They found footprints and tracked them for approximately 5km, where they found 4/5 persons sitting down to eat. Having been disturbed by the trackers, they all split up and ran into the mountains. An axe was later found, which DNA analysis later confirmed had carried blood from a white rhino. One person was later found and was shot in the hip. The evidence of the tracker, who testified that he matched the shoes which the accused was wearing at the time of his arrest to the tracks at the crime scene, formed the crux of the case. Having denied that the shoe belonged to him, the accused’s’ foot was cast and the shoe sent for forensic analysis to make the necessary comparison, after which it was confirmed that the shoe was in fact that which was worn by the accused. The accused was charged and convicted in terms of the Limpopo Environmental Management Act for illegal hunting of a rhino (count 1) and for trespassing (count 2). Upon conviction, Col. Jooste testified in aggravation of sentence, which contributed significantly to the accused being sentenced to 12 years imprisonment on count 1 and 1 year imprisonment on count 2, with both counts to run concurrently. S v Els - Case Number: 1067A/2010, Musina Regional Court (Prosecutor A Weideman) A game trader in Thabazimbi pleaded guilty to the illegal buying, possession and conveyance of 30 rhino horns (count 1), which he bought from a now deceased acquaintance. The seller was the manager of Maremani Nature Reserve, owned by a Danish consortium, where rhino were dehorned and sold to the game trader. The game trader also dehorned 8 of his own rhino (count 2). He was sentenced to 10 years imprisonment, 2 of which were suspended for 5 years in respect of count 1, and to 4 years imprisonment, wholly suspended in respect of count 2. He was further ordered to pay R100 000 per month over a ten month period to the National Wildlife Crime Reaction Unit to assist in rhino research. S v D Mathebula and two others - Case Number: 230/11, Mokopane District Court (Prosecutor E Nel) A member of the public driving past the veld saw something that resembled a torch light. Aware of the cycad thefts in the area, he reported a suspicious red bakkie to the authorities. Four accused were later arrested, having been found in possession of one cycad, with another pointed out at the location where it had been hidden. The value of the two cycads was estimated at R18 250.00, and both could not be saved. The accused were later charged in terms of Section 57(1) of the Biodiversity Act. For their varying roles in carrying out the offence, Accused 1 and 3 were sentenced to 30 months imprisonment, Accused 2 sentenced to 4 years imprisonment, and Accused 4 sentenced to 2 years imprisonment, suspended for 5 years.
Recommended publications
  • International Criminal Court, the Hague
    INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, THE HAGUE NOTICE OF COMPLAINT ITO ART.15 OF ROME STATUTE COMPLAINANTS: RADICAL HONESTY – SA First Complainant LARA JOHNSTONE Second Complainant POLITICAL TRC FRAUD DEFENDANTS: DESMOND TUTU First Defendant ALEX BORAINE Second Defendant NELSON MANDELA Third Defendant NELSON MANDELA FOUNDATION Fourth Defendant F.W. DE KLERK Fifth Defendant F.W. DE KLERK FOUNDATION Sixth Defendant NORWEGIAN NOBEL COMMITTEE Seventh Defendant SANDILE NGCOBO Eighth Defendant DIKGANG MOSENEKE Ninth Defendant EDWIN CAMERON Tenth Defendant JOHAN FRONEMAN Eleventh Defendant CHRIS JAFTA Twelfth Defendant SISI KHAMPEPE Thirteenth Defendant MOGOENG MOGOENG Fourteenth Defendant BESS NKABINDE Fifteenth Defendant JOHANN VAN DER WESTHUIZEN Sixteenth Defendant ZAK JACOOB Seventeenth Defendant ZA MEDIA TRC FRAUD DEFENDANTS ACCESSORIES: SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL EDITORS FORUM (SANEF) First Accessory MONDLI MAKHANYA Second Accessory JOE THLOLOE Third Accessory RALPH ZULMAN Fourth Accessory JOHAN RETIEF Fifth Accessory SOUTH AFRICAN PRESS ASSOCIATION (SAPA) Sixth Accessory MARK VAN DER VELDEN Seventh Accessory BUSINESS DAY Eighth Accessory PETER BRUCE Ninth Accessory BUSINESS REPORT Tenth Accessory JABULANI SIKHAKHANE Eleventh Accessory CAPE ARGUS Twelfth Accessory CHRIS WITFIELD Thirteenth Accessory CAPE TIMES Fourteenth Accessory ALIDE DASNOIS Fifteenth Accessory CITY PRESS Sixteenth Accessory FERIAL HAFFAJEE Seventeenth Accessory THE CITIZEN Eighteenth Accessory MARTIN WILLIAMS Nineteenth Accessory DAILY DISPATCH Twentieth Accessory ANDREW TRENCH
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 SAIIA Highlights Brochure
    Telephone : +27 (0) 11 339 202 Fax : +27 (0) 11 339 254 Web : www.saiia.org.za SAIIA_cover.indd 2-3 3/10/10 12:56:22 PM OUR VISION OUR MISSION To be the pre-eminent think-tank on Africa To provide cutting-edge analysis and promote and on global issues as they affect Africa. balanced dialogue on issues crucial to Africa’s advancement and its engagement in a dynamic global context. CONTENTS Message from the National Chairman, Fred Phaswana, and the National Director, Elizabeth Sidiropoulos 2 Profi le of the Organisation 4 Key Objectives 2009 6 Outputs 7 75th Anniversary 8 Travel 10 Collaboration with other Organisations 12 SAIIA’s Research Agenda 14 Governance and Democracy 14 South African Foreign Policy and African Drivers 16 Great Powers and Africa 18 Economic Diplomacy 20 Global Governance and Sustainable Development 22 Financial Statements 24 Funding 25 the skill to convince often suspicious or sceptical stakeholders about how our research helps policy makers to arrive at better decisions, and ultimately better lives for all. Think tanks have to be at the cutting-edge of the world’s biggest challenges – war and insecurity, poverty and marginalisation, and to provide answers and options on how best to fi ght these through collaboration across borders and without regard to narrow self-interest. We would argue that this responsibility is even greater for think thanks in Africa because the stakes on rolling back war and reducing poverty are so much higher. It was a great honour for SAIIA to be ranked the top think tank in sub-Saharan Africa in 2009 in the annual think tank survey conducted by the University of Pennsylvania.
    [Show full text]
  • Compiled Speaker Bios
    HEALTHCARE OF THE FUTURE : THE GOOD , THE BAD & THE NANO ? MEDIA ROUND TABLE – 9 FEBRUARY 2011 SPEAKER INFORMATION Ms Debora Patta - Facilitator Debora Patta is currently Executive Producer and anchor of Third Degree – South Africa’s top rated current affairs programme. She is famous for her no-holds barred interviewing style and for her tough uncompromising journalism. Debora is a multi- award winning journalist who was recently honoured with the Vodacom Media Woman of the Year. She has covered virtually every major story both locally and internationally over the past 20 years. 1990 marked her first foray into journalism working as a production assistant for the BBC. She then joined Radio 702 and worked her way through the ranks as an overnight producer, reporter and News Editor. In 1998 she joined South Africa’s first independent free-to-air channel where she has carved a career both on-air and in management. In 2001 she conceived and launched Third Degree. In 2005 she was appointed Editor-in-Chief for e.news and was part of the team that turned around the company’s news ratings and headed the team that launched South Africa’s first independent 24hr news channel in 2008. Debora has covered stories ranging from Nelson Mandela’s presidency to 9/11, the Gulf Wars, Princess Di’s death and the Obama election. She has co-authored two books and is married with two daughters. Mr Matlho JJ Molapisi, Department of Science and Technology Email: [email protected] ; Tel: 012 843 6460 Matlho is the Director of the Emerging Research Areas at the Department of Science and Technology (DST).
    [Show full text]
  • Global and Local Narratives of the South African General Elections
    DESPERATELY SEEKING DEPTH: Global and local narratives of the South African general elections on television news, 1994 – 2014 By Bernadine Jones Town Cape Thesis presentedof for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY at the Centre for Film and Media Studies UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN UniversityAugust 2017 1 The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Published by the University of Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University of Cape Town Declaration of own work and publications This thesis is my own work, conducted in Cape Town, South Africa between January 2014 and August 2017. I confirm that I have been granted permission by the University of Cape Town’s Doctoral Degrees Board to include the following publication(s) in my PhD thesis: Jones, B. 2016. Television news and the digital environment: a triadic multimodal approach for analysing moving image media, in African Journalism Studies 37(2): 116-137 2 Acknowledgements What respectable body of work would be complete without expressing ones gratitude to those who have helped carry the author – mind, soul, and sometimes body – through the wilderness of research and analysis? It stands to reason then that I convey my utmost appreciation for my two supervisors, Drs Martha Evans and Wallace Chuma, for guiding me along this path with infinite patience, wisdom, and maddening attention to detail without which I would flounder.
    [Show full text]
  • Law Review 5.Fm
    RACE AND RAC(IAL)ISM, THE POLITICS OF PEACE AND FRIENDSHIP IN A LIBERAL CONSTITUTION NEW REFLECTIONS OR OLD WINE IN NEW BOTTLES? A CRITICAL ANALYSIS by J Modiri* 1Introduction Figure 1 & 2: Lithographs by Anton Kannemeyer (bitterkomix)1 The context of this article is a two-part investigative documentary on ‘race’ as an enduring fault line in South African politics on etv’s 3rd * Joel S M Modiri, first year LLB student, University of Pretoria. My thanks to Professors Anton Kok, Duard Kleyn and Karin van Marle for incisive comments and illuminating discussions. I must also thank Ms Lorette Arendse for inputs and editorial suggestions to the final draft of this article. 1 In these prints Anton Kannemeyer has focused on images from his Alphabet of Democracy series. 43 (2010) 4 Pretoria Student Law Review 44 degree (2010)2 programme as well as a true-life drama, For One Night (2006)3 which explores a 30-year old ‘tradition’ of racially segregated school dances in southern American states. The events detailed in both shows resonate strongly with the essence of this article in that they both publicly engage with and challenge pre-existing ideas about race and racialism and depict ordinary citizens having to be confronted by the ongoing uneasiness of race in their daily lives. On 3rd degree, students at University of the Free State (UFS), spoke honestly about the challenges of racism they face at UFS, on campus and in the residences. On For One Night, conservative white families had to come to terms with the possibility of their children mingling with their black counterparts at the traditionally segregated school dance for the first time in 30 years.
    [Show full text]
  • State Department News Clips
    United States Department of State Washington, D. C. 20520 October 10, 2018 Case No.: F-201 8-00529, F-2018-00827, F-2018-01063, & F-201 8-01467 Michael Bekesha, Esq. Judicial Watch, Inc. 425 Third Street, S.W., Suite 800 Washington, D.C. 20024 Dear Mr. Bekesha: I refer you to our letter dated September 12, 2018, regarding the review of certain Department of State material under the Freedom oflnformation Act (the "FOIA"), 5 U.S.C. § 552. The review of potentially responsive records is ongoing and has resulted in the retrieval of nine documents responsive to your request. After reviewing these documents, we have determined that seven may be released in full and two may be released in part. All released material is enclosed. Where a document has been released to you in part, all non-exempt material that is reasonably segregable from the exempt material has been released. Where we have made excisions, the applicable exemptions are marked on the document. An enclosure provides information on FOIA exemptions and other grounds for withholding material. We will keep you advised as your case progresses. If you have any questions, you may contact Trial Attorney Damon William Taaffe at (202) 252-2544 or damon.taaffe@usdoj. gov. Please refer to the case numbers cited above and the civil action number, l 8-cv-968, in all correspondence regarding this case. c~Sincerely, eeunan~ Chief, Programs and Polici 1v1s10n Office of Information Programs and Services Enclosures: As stated The Freedom of Information Act (5 USC 552) FOIA Exemptions (b)(1) Information specifically authorized by an executive order to be kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy.
    [Show full text]
  • CASE NUMBER: 60/2012 DATE of HEARING: 28 NOVEMBER 2012 JUDGMENT RELEASE DATE: 14 DECEMBER 2012 AGULHAS COMPLAINANT Vs Toptv
    CASE NUMBER: 60/2012 DATE OF HEARING: 28 NOVEMBER 2012 JUDGMENT RELEASE DATE: 14 DECEMBER 2012 AGULHAS COMPLAINANT vs TopTV RESPONDENT TRIBUNAL: PROF JCW VAN ROOYEN SC (CHAIRPERSON) ADV B MMUSINYANE PROF S LÖTTER (CO-OPTED) The Complainant was invited but was unable to attend. For the Respondent: Mmabatho Kau, Channel Manager: Top ONE accompanied by Elvis Mudau, Programme Acceptance Officer. ________________________________________________________________________ Religion – satire not denigrating Jesus and not amounting to hate speech based on religion – Agulhas vs TopTV Case No: 60/2012(BCCSA). ______ __________________________________________________________________ SUMMARY The Registrar received a complaint concerning an insert in a news programme that, inter alia, consists of humorous and satirical perspectives of the news by way of puppets resembling the characters portrayed. Given the sensitive nature of one of the items, which satirised a recently discovered fourth-century Coptic text stating that Jesus had been married, the matter was referred to a Tribunal. The Tribunal held that the item did not qualify as hate speech based on religion, as defined in the Code. The Tribunal reasoned as follows: The TopTV news item does not denigrate Jesus. In fact, the Jesus puppet remains silent when his “wife” accuses him of poor wine-making, messing in the bathroom while trying to walk on water and that he should tell Mary Magdalene to stop calling him. The “wife” is portrayed as a modern-day woman who smokes and drinks; she is also a foolish, nagging wife. Nothing that she says in the programme is in any way impressive. It is in fact she who is the object of the satire.
    [Show full text]
  • CASE NUMBER: 13/2010 DATE of HEARING: 10 JUNE 2010 VRYHEIDSFRONT PLUS and OTHERS COMPLAINANTS Vs E-Tv RESPONDENT TRIBUNAL
    CASE NUMBER: 13/2010 DATE OF HEARING: 10 JUNE 2010 VRYHEIDSFRONT PLUS AND OTHERS COMPLAINANTS vs e-tv RESPONDENT TRIBUNAL: PROF HP VILJOEN (DEPUTY CHAIRPERSON) MS Z MBOMBO MS M NKWANE PROF G OLIVIER Complainant: Adv A Alberts and Clr Franco de Lange of the Vryheidsfront Plus. Respondent: Attorneys Dan Rosengarten and David Feinberg, presenter Debra Patta, Complaints Executive Bop Tshweu, Devon Koen, Jnr Producer, 3rd Degree ________________________________________________________________________ Complaints about programme investigating racial relations in South Africa, especially on the campus of the Free State University- matter settled through negotiations between the parties- complaints withdrawn -Vryheidsfront Plus & Others vs e-tv, Case No: 13/2010(BCTSA). ________________________________________________________________________ SUMMARY This matter dealt with complaints about a “3rd Degree” programme investigating racial relations in South Africa, especially on the campus of the Free State 2 University. The matter was settled through negotiations between the parties and the complaints were withdrawn. _______________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT PROF HP VILJOEN [1] Various complaints were received from the Freedom Front Plus and others after the broadcasting of a “3rd Degree” programme during which the state of racial relations in South Africa and especially on the campus of the Free State University was investigated. The BCCSA received the following complaints. [2] Vryheidsfront Plus: INSAKE: KLAGTE TEEN e.TV, die Vervaardigers van die aktualiteitsprogram ‘3rd Degree’ en me Deborah Patta, die joernalis en aanbieder van die Program Die Vryheidsfront Plus van Suid Afrika wil hiermee ‘n formele klag teen bogenoemde partye (die “Verweerders”) lê, spesifiek soos hieronder uiteengesit. 1. Uitsaai Inligting: 1.1. Program: 3rd Degree 1.2. Kanaal: e.TV 1.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloads Just Aren't What They Used to Be”
    The columnist as trickster: satire and subversion in literary journalism. GREIG DOUGLAS Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of the requirements for the degree of Magister Artium in the Faculty of Arts at the Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, January 2012. Supervisor: Dr M L Crous Co-supervisor: Prof L Hibbert Table of Contents Page. i. Abstract. PART 1: A self-reflexive essay examining the complicity of South African satire in the perpetuation of white normativity. 1. Introduction 1 2. Satire, whiteness and related concepts. 4 3. Background to The Weekly Crab. 3.1: Positioning. 8 3.2: Audience. 11 4. A critique of Hayibo. 12 5. A critique of The Weekly Crab. 26 6. Conclusion. 37 7. Bibliography. 39 PART 2: The Weekly Crab (editions 1 to 13) as a creative, countertextual response to instances of white normativity in mainstream South African satire. i. Abstract. This project examines facets of racial identity as they emerge in a contemporary South African context, and considers how instances of local satire both subtly resist and support white normativity. It consists of two separate sections: firstly, a self-reflective essay that, employing current theories from the academic field of whiteness studies, assesses South African satire’s relation to and negotiation of race and identity politics; and secondly, The Weekly Crab, my own creative response to the genre of satire. Using contemporary theories of racial construction, the first section will delineate whiteness as a dominant but invisible identification, and as a social construction underpinned by an inherited and continually reproduced privilege.
    [Show full text]
  • Children of Fire Charity Takes on E.Tv's Patta
    PRETORIA NEWS 3 TUESDAY AUGUST 11 2009 News Children of Fire charity takes on e.tv’s Patta Trust’s founder wants R5m, says she was defamed in a 3rd Degree programme HANTI OTTO for R2 million for damages to her charity’s care. The programme also asked Jones why 1 200 victims of neglected children and exploited the COURT REPORTER reputation. alleged that Jones handed out fires in Johannesburg that year did goodwill and generosity of the pub- Patta and e.tv have until Thurs- expired food. not receive blankets. Jones replied lic for personal gain. HE CHILDREN of Fire day to respond. Patta started the programme, that they were not asked for 1 200 In addition, it feared that the pub- Trust and its founder are e.tv spokesman Vasili Vass con- saying: “With blankets, food or blankets. lic would believe Children of Fire suing e.tv and Debora firmed that they had received the money, South Africans are known The court papers quoted Patta: was lying and collected charitable Patta of the programme summons and would defend it in for their generosity. A generosity, in “That is a complete bald-faced lie. donations under false pretence. T3rd Degree for R5 million court. the case of tonight’s story, that was You were supposed to distribute The additional “sting” was that after alleged defamatory pro- Children of Fire takes care of sadly abused (by Jones and/or Chil- them”, and, later in the programme: the charity was inefficient, could grammes were aired in August and burn victims by supplying medical dren of Fire).” “You are lying again.
    [Show full text]
  • 2030 Conversations
    1 2030 Conversations “Ladies and gentlemen, fellow South Africans, I do know one thing for sure: when 2030 does finally come along, there will still be rainbows arching over the horizons of our beautiful and beloved land as a sign of hope. May God richly bless South Africa’s future. Nkosi Sikelel' iAfrika.” Opening Address by Archbishop Desmond Tutu, 6 May 2010 By the South African Chapter of the World Future Society © World Future Society of South Africa www.wfs-sa.com June 2010 2 The 2030 Painting By Charlene Maslamoney © World Future Society of South Africa www.wfs-sa.com June 2010 3 Table of Contents The 2030 Painting 2 Foreword 4 Introduction to 2030 Conversations 5 Starting the Journey to South Africa of 2030 8 Conversations about the First Future Pillar: Ethos 10 Conversations about the Second Future Pillar: Education 15 Conversations about the Third Future Pillar: Economics 17 Conversations about the Fourth Future Pillar: Environment 21 Conversations about the Fifth Future Pillar: Energy 27 Conversations about Problem-Solving and Measuring Future Progress 34 Future Dreams to Explore 39 Conclusion 40 © World Future Society of South Africa www.wfs-sa.com June 2010 Foreword 4 “2030 Conversations” is about applying futures thinking to an analysis of South Africa’s prospects in the time period 2010-2030. Its purpose is to inspire knowledge-based plans and strategies aimed at creating favourable conditions for the nation’s emerging future up to 2030. The paper records the key themes, messages and information shared at a conference organised by the South African Chapter of the World Future Society entitled “Energy, Environment, Education and Economics: Imagineering South Africa’s Future to 2030” which was held at the Pavilion Centre, V & A Waterfront, Cape Town, on 6-7 May, 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Focus 50 Editions
    FOCUS EDITORIAL DOn’T SQUANDER OR By Raenette Taljaard MISUSE MANDELA’S LEGACY elson Mandela’s 90th birthday is both a poignant their own countries, we denigrate the very essence of moment in history and a time to reflect on one man’s long walk to freedom, and what it represents Ncurrent political trends in South Africa to our entire global village. We celebrate Mandela’s crowning achievements, It is incumbent on the leaders of all political parties but simultaneously have to ask ourselves as a country in South Africa and the rest of us, not to render a what we intend to do with his legacy. Mandela himself squandered legacy to Madiba on his 90th birthday and in recent months has asked tough questions of the new beyond. It is our duty to demand values-based leadership leadership group and, in the wake of the spate of violent with as certain a true north as Madiba’s – freedom and a attacks on foreigners and South Africans alike, called for better life for all. It is our duty to demand sound ethics of a renewed commitment to unity on Youth Day. our political representatives, and to restore an awareness The Nelson Mandela Foundation has also in recent that public life means public duty, not opportunity for weeks made key statements about actions that violate personal aggrandisement and the pursuit of wealth either democracy, freedom or human rights. Theirs is a through public office. It is our duty as a nation to remind crucial voice that aims to link the values of Mandela to ourselves that Madiba’s long walk towards a rights-based our ongoing journey towards a consolidated democracy dispensation was a walk in the knowledge that we have a in South Africa, now in its 14th year.
    [Show full text]