Rapid Intensification of Hurricane Earl in Advanced Hurricane WRF Model Simulations Diamilet Pérez-Betancourt
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Rapid Intensification of Hurricane Earl in Advanced Hurricane WRF Model Simulations Diamilet Pérez-Betancourt Academic Affiliation, Fall 2011: Senior, University of Puerto Rico at Mayagüez SOARS® Summer 2011 Science Research Mentor: Christopher Davis Writing and Communication Mentor: Kimberly Kosmenko ABSTRACT Rapid intensification (RI) is a form of tropical cyclone (TC) intensification that is particularly challenging to predict. Understanding RI is essential for improving hurricane intensity forecast skill and hurricane preparedness. However, the physical processes that lead to RI are not well understood. Hurricane Earl, the second-strongest TC of the 2010 North Atlantic basin season, underwent RI on August 29, in its first day as a hurricane. The Advanced Hurricane Weather Research and Forecasting (AHW) model produced a simulation of Earl that was unsuccessful in predicting intensification, followed closely by a simulation successfully forecasting RI. The purpose of this study is to investigate the environmental and storm structure characteristics that led to Earl’s simulated RI. The unsuccessful and successful simulations were first compared in terms of the environmental vertical wind shear, because this parameter is often negatively correlated with TC intensification. Area averages of the deep-layer and mid-layer vertical wind shear over the storm suggest that this parameter did not influence the intensification of the successful simulation. Initially, the successful simulation featured greater relative humidity throughout the troposphere within the storm’s circulation. This led to a greater upward mass flux throughout the troposphere and a rapid intensification of circulation in the middle troposphere before any significant change occurred at the surface. After this deep vortex had been established, the mass flux (and lower-tropospheric convergence) continued to increase, leading to RI. These results provide a basis for further research to better understand and predict the development of RI. The Significant Opportunities in Atmospheric Research and Science (SOARS) Program is managed by the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (UCAR) with support from participating universities. SOARS is funded by the National Science Foundation, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Climate Program Office, the NOAA Oceans and Human Health Initiative, the Center for Multi-Scale Modeling of Atmospheric Processes at Colorado State University, and the Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences. 1. Introduction Tropical cyclones (TCs), named hurricanes in the North Atlantic and Eastern Pacific basins, are among Earth’s most devastating natural phenomena. This threat has motivated the efforts to better predict the TC’s track and intensity changes. Despite these efforts, predictions of TC intensification continue to have limited success (DeMaria et al. 2007). One particularly difficult to predict form of TC intensification is rapid intensification (RI), which the National Hurricane Center (NHC) defines as an increase in the maximum sustained surface wind speed of at least 15.4 ms-1 in a 24-hour period (NHC 2011). The physical mechanisms that lead to RI are still poorly understood. Several studies have assessed the processes that influence TC development and intensification (e. g., Gray 1968, Merrill 1988, Frank and Ritchie 1999). However, only a few studies have explicitly examined RI (Kaplan and DeMaria 2003). We base our study on the factors that have been generally related to TC intensification. These factors, which are briefly reviewed below, may be categorized as: atmosphere-ocean interactions, environmental influences, and inner core dynamics (Bosart et al. 2000). Studies focusing on atmosphere-ocean interactions have recognized sea surface temperature (SST) as an indicator of the maximum potential intensity of hurricanes (e.g., Malkus and Riehl 1960; Emanuel 1986). High SSTs enhance the latent heat flux, or transfer of energy, between the sea surface and the atmosphere. This flux supports convection, a mechanism for cloud formation, as water evaporates from the ocean surface. Therefore, high SSTs are expected to be favorable for RI. Nevertheless, Merrill (1988) argued that most hurricanes never reach the SST-dependent maximum intensity. He suggested that unfavorable atmospheric conditions prevent these TCs from intensifying. Thus, Merrill focused on the TC environment-structure interactions. He compared the atmospheric conditions surrounding intensifying and non-intensifying hurricanes with current intensity far below their maximum potential. Merril’s findings indicate that low environmental vertical wind shear is also favorable for TC intensification. This conclusion has been confirmed by more recent studies (Frank and Ritchie 1999, 2001). Thus, the general influence of large-scale environmental flows over TC intensification has been well established. However, we still have much to learn about the specifics of the complex physical processes involved in this interaction, specifically during RI events. Studies of the inner core dynamics of TCs link intensity changes with eyewall replacement cycles (e. g., Shapiro and Willoughby 1982, Willoughby et al. 1982). Other studies link TC intensification with potential vorticity anomalies (e.g., Montgomery and Kallenbach 1997, Molinari et al. 1998, Möller and Montgomery 2000). Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) models, such as the Advanced Hurricane Weather Research and Forecasting (AHW) model, are utilized to predict the evolution of the TC inner core and TC intensity changes. These models are limited by initial condition errors related to the representation of the TC inner structure (Torn 2010). Understanding the TC inner core dynamics, as well as their relationship with the environment, is necessary to predict RI occurrence. Davis et al. (2008) evaluated the performance of the AHW in forecasting such rapid intensity changes during the 2005 North Atlantic season. The authors found SOARS® 2011, Diamilet Pérez-Betancourt, 2 that the AHW had difficulty capturing RI, particularly when RI occurred soon after initialization. We perform a case study of Hurricane Earl’s RI using AHW model simulations described by Davis et. al. (2010). According to the NHC TC report (Cangialosi 2011), Earl was one of the five major hurricanes of the 2010 North Atlantic season that experienced RI. Data from reconnaissance flights and satellite imagery indicate that Earl’s maximum sustained surface wind speed went from 38.6 ms-1 (August 29, 18:00 UTC) to 59.2 ms-1 (August 30, 18:00 UTC), increasing 20.6 ms-1 over a day. Interestingly, the AHW produced a simulation of Hurricane Earl with almost no intensification (0.7 ms-1 increase in maximum wind in 24-hours) followed closely by a simulation that captured the RI event more accurately (14.0 ms-1 increase in maximum wind in 24-hours) (Figure 1). Figure 1. Evolution of Hurricane Earl’s maximum wind speed. The black curve shows the official estimate from the NHC. The red curve shows the results of the AHW simulation starting in August 27, which produced almost no intensification. The blue curve shows the results of the AHW simulation starting in August 28, which followed closely the observed RI. The purpose of this study is to assess the environmental and structural characteristics that led to Hurricane Earl’s simulated RI. Our approach is to first compare the aforementioned unsuccessful and successful AHW simulations on a large-scale by examining the environmental vertical wind shear. We chose this parameter because it is often considered an unfavorable factor for TC intensification. Vertical wind shear can advect the heat and moisture away from the inner core of the storm necessary for convection (Gray 1968), or can tilt the vortex, producing an anomaly that inhibits convection (DeMaria 1996). SOARS® 2011, Diamilet Pérez-Betancourt, 3 Subsequently, we compare the simulations in terms of Hurricane Earl’s vortex characteristics. We examine the local rate of change of the relative vorticity (ζ) in isobaric coordinates , which is given by: ! !! ! !! ! ! %!V ( = "V •#(! + f ) "" " (! + f )#•V + k •' $ #"* (1) t p p ! ! & ! ) where p is the pressure, is the horizontal wind velocity vector, is the absolute vorticity or Coriolis parameter, and ω is the vertical wind velocity in pressure coordinates (!p / dt ). The area-average of the relative vorticity is defined as the circulation of the storm. Thus, we examine the vorticity equation (1) to identify the processes by which the successful simulation developed a stronger circulation (Figure 2). Initialized at 2010-08-27_00:00:00 Initialized at 2010-08-28_00:00:00 (a) (b) Figure 2. Horizontal wind field of Hurricane Earl at August 30 00:00 UTC from (a) the unsuccesful simulation, and (b) the successful simulation. The successful simulation developed the typical hurricane structure, including the eye and the highest winds in the eyewall. Our expectation is that the mechanism by which the AHW rapidly intensified Earl in the successful simulation is the mechanism by which the observed Earl rapidly intensified. To verify this, our analysis needs to be validated with observations of the storm’s environmental and structural characteristics. This analysis contributes to the understanding of how rapid intensification occurs, therefore improving the accuracy of intensity forecasting. The rest of the paper is organized as follows. Section 2 provides a synopsis of the history of Hurricane