DOCSLIB.ORG

Programme Book

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Programme Book ESEH 2007 – Programme Book Programme Book Fourth Conference of the European Society of Environmental History “Environmental Connections. Europe and the wider world” Editors Petra van Dam Hans Renes Colophon Production and coordination MCCM Meeting Management, Harmelen, the Netherlands Value: € 10,-- ©2007 LOC ESEH2007 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or any information storage and retrieval system, without the written permission of the organizers. Responsibility for the contents of abstracts contained in this publication rests with the abstract authors. Abstracts are published as submitted by the authors. 1 ESEH 2007 – Programme Book Table of contents Page Welcome Organisation Venue Social Programme General Information Prizes Full Programme Authors Index Notes Partners 2 ESEH 2007 – Programme Book Welcome The organisers of the Fourth Conference of the European Society for Environmental History welcome you to Amsterdam. The theme of the conference is ‘Environmental Connections: Europe and the wider world.‘ It is hosted by the Faculty of Arts and the Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences of the Vrije Universiteit (VU University). The ultimate question for our generation concerns the sustainability of human activities within the ecological carrying capacity of the earth. In the past this question emerged at a variety of spatial scales, from the largest to the smallest, but today it has become especially relevant on the global scale. Understanding the past is a prerequisite for facing the future. This applies to questions of sustainability even more than to many other subjects. Research in environmental history makes an important contribution to understanding the past by collecting and processing information about the complex relationship between humans and nature over an extended period of time. In this way, environmental historians can contribute to constructing new worldviews about the interactions between humans and nature in the past and the present. We hope to motivate educators, policy makers and entrepreneurs to devise attitudes, policies and forms of corporate responsibility capable of safeguarding both the future of our planet and us. Environmental history is a small but lively field of study in the Netherlands. In particular the history of water management has a great tradition. The present interest in climate change (in this country, records are being broken continuously; we just had an extremely warm and dry spring), makes the future of our low-lying country a serious concern. Correspondingly, the study of historical sources that enable insights into the climate history of the last millennium is a flourishing field of study. Since the first meeting in 2001, the ESEH conference has grown to be the international meeting place for all scholars working on the environmental history of Europe. For the present conference, we follow the basic layout of the earlier conferences. The keynote lecture is delivered by Jane Carruthers from the University of South-Africa, Pretoria. We host a Plenary Poster Session and in the Regional Session Dutch and Flemish scholars will present the latest developments in environmental history. The final day, Saturday, is reserved for field excursions. New elements in this conference are the Publishing Workshop on Wednesday, where editors of leading journals discuss their policies, and the Plenary Panel Session on Friday, featuring the panel chosen by the Scientific Committee as the best panel of the conference. Finally, we want to thank all people who have contributed to the realisation of the conference. The Scientific Committee, the Advisory Board, the panel organisers, and those who provided technical assistance during the preparation all deserve our gratitude for their excellent work. Also we gratefully acknowledge the most generous support of our partners. We wish you an inspiring meeting! Petra van Dam Karel Davids Adrie de Kraker Hans Renes Wybren Verstegen 3 ESEH 2007 – Programme Book Organisation Local Organising Committee (LOC) Dr. Petra van Dam, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, (head) prof. dr. Karel Davids, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam (chair) Dr. Adriaan de Kraker, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam Dr. Hans Renes, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam/ Utrecht University, Utrecht Dr. Wybren Verstegen, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam Scientific Committee (SC) Dr. Gabriella Corona, National Council Research, Naples, Italy (chair) Prof. dr. Timo Myllyntaus, University of Turu, Finland Dr. Richard Oram, University of Stirling, Schotland Dr. Peter Szabo, Eotvos Lorand University, Budapest, Hungary Prof. dr. Erik Thoen, Ghent University, Belgium Advisory Board (AB) Prof. dr. Jan Luiten van Zanden, International Institute of Social History (IISG)/ Utrecht University, Utrecht (chair) Prof. dr. Jan Boersema, Vrije Universiteit (Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam) Prof. dr. Peter Boomgaard, Royal Netherlands Institute of Southeast Asian and Caribbean Studies (KITLV), Leiden Prof. dr. Erik Thoen, Ghent University, Belgium Prof. ir. Klaas van Egmond, Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (MNP), Bilthoven 4 ESEH 2007 – Programme Book Venue The conference takes place at the Vrije Universiteit (VU University), Main Building, De Boelelaan 1105, Amsterdam. How to get there The VU is well accessible by local public transport. From the city centre, you can take: • Tram 5, direction Amstelveen/Binnenhof. The stop “De Boelelaan/VU” is next to the VU Main Building. It takes some 25 minutes from Amsterdam Central Station. • “Sneltram” 51 (combined metro/express tram), direction Amstelveen/Westwijk. The stop “De Boelelaan/VU” is next to the main building. It takes some 16 minutes from Amsterdam Central Station. • Tram 16, direction VU Medisch Centrum. The stop “VU Medisch Centrum” is in front of the Vrije Universiteit’s Hospital, which is next to the university’s Main Building (a five minutes walk). It takes some 20 minutes from Amsterdam Central Station. Your hotel service desk can advise you about the best connection from your hotel. When arriving directly from Schiphol Airport, you take a direct train to Amsterdam Zuid WTC Train Station, and either walk to the main building (5-10 minutes) or use tram 5 or sneltram 51 (one stop, same directions as above). 5 ESEH 2007 – Programme Book Inside the building The VU’s conference facilities are located in the university’s main building, De Boelelaan 1105, Amsterdam. To find your way inside the building, the following directions may be useful (see also the map of the main building on the next page): • The registration/conference desk is on the ground floor, immediately to the right when entering the building through the main entrance. (The reception desk of the Vrije Universiteit is immediately to the left when entering the building through the main entrance). • Plenary sessions are held in the university’s Aula, having its entrance on the first floor, right above the registration desk. • Parallel sessions are held in lecture rooms on various floors of the main building’s A-wing. • Lunches will be in the university restaurant, on the ground floor level and close to the conference desk. • Coffee breaks take place in the lobby area on the first floor, right above the main entrance. See the map of the building on the next page for further details. Access to conference activities The name badge that you receive upon registration entitles you to enter all session rooms and to enjoy complementary coffee and lunch services arranged for participants. We kindly ask you to wear the badge at all conference events. Additional vouchers or invitations should be shown for access to the Global Reception, the ESEH Awards Dinner and the field excursions. These will be included in the personal envelope that you receive upon registration. Smoking Smoking is prohibited in public buildings and public transportation. Smoking in the university, and on public transport stations, is allowed only in designated smoking areas, or outside the building. 6 ESEH 2007 – Programme Book Map of the building Parallel sessions are held in rooms on several floors of the A-wing of the university’s main building. These floors can be reached by the central elevators near the main entrance, by various (emergency) stairs, and by elevators and stairs halfway into the A-wing. The room coding is such that, for example, room 2A-05 is room 05, on floor 2, of the A-wing. Floors are numbered such that the ground level is level 0. The schematic map below shows the relevant locations on the ground floor level, and – using bold capitals to indicate locations – on higher levels of the main building. Stairs XE-37 E-wing Elevators D-wing XA-16 A-wing XA-06 XA-05 XA-04 Stairs XA-02 Stairs to Lobby A and Aula B B-wing Elevators University Conference Entrance Stairs reception desk C restaurant Main entrance LEGEND A, first floor: Lobby (Coffee breaks and Posters) B, first floor: Aula and Auditorium C, basement: Copy shop and other shops X: Rooms on floors. X means floors 1 and up 7 ESEH 2007 – Programme Book Social Programme Welcome Reception (Tuesday, June 5, 17.30 – 18,30) Lobby Area, Vrije Universiteit All participants and their partners are welcome at the Welcome Reception. Free drinks and bites will be served. Global Reception (Wednesday, June 6, 18.30 – 20.00) Museum Restaurant Ekeko of the Royal Tropical Institute (KIT), Linnaeusstraat 2, Amsterdam Restaurant Ekeko is part of the Royal Tropical Institute and can be reached from the VU by tram 5 to “Leidseplein”, than change to tram 7 or 10 (stop: Mauritskade). Free drinks and small bites will be served. All pre-registered participants are welcome to use the free boat transfer. Please come to the Registration desk at 17.00 hrs. for a guided walk to the boats. Welcome Reception (Thursday, June 7, 18.15 – 19.15) Foyer, City Hall (Stopera building), Amstel 1, Amsterdam The City Hall is located in the city centre, next to the Waterlooplein and can be reached by trams no.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 50 Years Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
    1 History – Present – Future 50 Years Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf History – Present – Future 50 Years Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf An exhibition by the rectorate’s officer for the anniversary, Prof. Dr. Ulrich von Alemann, the Prorector for International Relations, Prof. Dr. Andrea von Hülsen-Esch, the University Archive (department of the Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek), Dr. Julius Leonhard, and the Communications Department (Rectorate), Dr. Arne Claussen and Monika Fastner. The exhibition is divided into five stages, documenting early academic life in Düsseldorf as well as the history of Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf. Legal notice CONTENTS 4 Yasmin Frommont, Inga Koithahn, Julius Leonhard, Florian Meier, Antonia Riedel REALISatiON Arne Claussen, Daniel Cremer, Monika Fastner, Joachim Tomesch LayOUT zweizueins – Visuelle Konzepte COVER PHOTO Peter Sondermann TRANSlatiON Sven Ondrazek EDITING Andrea Schmittmann OVERALL RESPONSIBILITY Ulrich von Alemann PRINT AND PRODUCTION Griebsch & Rochol Druck GmbH & Co. KG Kindly supported by 50 Years Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf Foreword Heinrich Heine University celebrates its 50th anniversary this year. In honour of this fine occasion, we invite you to go back to the roots of our young alma mater and its academic predecessors, trace its development to the present day and take a look at the future of our university. This is what the “50 Years Hein- rich Heine University Düsseldorf” exhibition is all about. Opening in summer 2015 at the Haus der Universität, the exhibition is documented in this brochure. In 1965, state government decided on the foundation of the later Heinrich Heine University, which arose from the Academy of Practical Medicine, founded over 100 years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Th E “Physica Mosaica” of Johann Heinrich Alsted (1588–1638)
    TEORIE VĚDY / THEORY OF SCIENCE / XLII / 2020 / 1 https://doi.org/10.46938/tv.2020.472 ////// tematické studie / thematic articles ////////////////////// TH E “PHYSICA MOSAICA” OF „Physica Mosaica“ Johanna JOHANN HEINRICH ALSTED Heinricha Alsteda (1588–1638) (1588–1638) Abstrakt: Někteří raně novověcí učenci Abstract: Some early modern scholars byli přesvědčeni, že Písmo poskytuje jistější believed that Scripture provided more poznání nežli všechny světské autority – certain knowledge than all secular au- s Aristotelem včele – či zkoumání samotné thorities – even Aristotle – or investigating přírody. Ve své studii se zabývám jednou nature as such. In this paper, I analyse one z takových snah o získání toho nejspolehli- such attempt to establish the most reliable vějšího vědění o přírodě: takzvanou mosaic- knowledge of nature: the so-called Mosaic kou fyzikou, jak ji koncipoval reformovaný physics proposed by the Reformed encyclo- encyklopedista Johann Heinrich Alsted. Ač- paedist Johann Heinrich Alsted. Although in koliv ve svých raných dílech, jež se Physica his early works on Physica Mosaica Alsted Mosaica týkají, Alsted za svůj nejvyšší cíl declares that his primary aim is proving prohlašuje dokázání souladu mezi různými the harmony that exists between various podobami přírodní fi losofi e, především mezi traditions of natural philosophy, namely mosaickým a peripatetickým přístupem, between the Mosaic and the Peripatetic a navzdory tomu, že jeho biblická encyklo- approaches, and despite the fact that his pedie z roku 1625 měla být založena na do- biblical encyclopaedia of 1625 was intended slovném čtení Bible, Alsted ve skutečnosti to be based on a literal reading of the Bible, nikdy neopustil aristotelská východiska pří- he never truly abandoned the Aristotelian rodní fi losofi e.
    [Show full text]
  • Philip Melanchthon's Influence on the English Theological
    PHILIP MELANCHTHON’S INFLUENCE ON ENGLISH THEOLOGICAL THOUGHT DURING THE EARLY ENGLISH REFORMATION By Anja-Leena Laitakari-Pyykkö A dissertation submitted In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Theology University of Helsinki Faculty of Theology August 2013 Copyright © 2013 by Anja-Leena Laitakari-Pyykkö To the memory of my beloved husband, Tauno Pyykkö ii Abstract Philip Melanchthon’s Influence on English Theological Thought during the Early English Reformation By Anja-Leena Laitakari-Pyykkö This study addresses the theological contribution to the English Reformation of Martin Luther’s friend and associate, Philip Melanchthon. The research conveys Melanchthon’s mediating influence in disputes between Reformation churches, in particular between the German churches and King Henry VIII from 1534 to 1539. The political background to those events is presented in detail, so that Melanchthon’s place in this history can be better understood. This is not a study of Melanchthon’s overall theology. In this work, I have shown how the Saxons and the conservative and reform-minded English considered matters of conscience and adiaphora. I explore the German and English unification discussions throughout the negotiations delineated in this dissertation, and what they respectively believed about the Church’s authority over these matters during a tumultuous time in European history. The main focus of this work is adiaphora, or those human traditions and rites that are not necessary to salvation, as noted in Melanchthon’s Confessio Augustana of 1530, which was translated into English during the Anglo-Lutheran negotiations in 1536. Melanchthon concluded that only rituals divided the Roman Church and the Protestants.
    [Show full text]
  • Johann Weyer
    Johann Weyer Vorkämpfer gegen den Hexenwahn am Hofe Wilhelm V Jennifer Riemek B.A. Veröffentlichung 01.07.2021 für extempore.org 1 Johann Weyer – Vorkämpfer gegen den Hexenwahn am Hofe Wilhelm V: Johann Weyer (1515/16 – 1588) – Medicus am Hofe des Herzogs Wilhelm V. im Herzogtum Jülich-Kleve-Berg, gilt als der erste Bekämpfer des Hexenwahns im 16. Jahrhundert. Mit seiner im Jahre 1563 veröffentlichen Schrift De praestigiis daemonum (zu Deutsch: Von den Blendwerken der Dämonen) versuchte er als erster den weitverbreiteten Hexenglauben in Mittel- und Zentraleuropa zu bekämpfen. Dieses Werk Weyers stellt die Grundlage für die Gegner der Hexenverfolgung in der frühen Neuzeit dar und erschien in zahlreichen Auflagen und Übersetzungen. Wir befinden uns im 16. Jahrhundert und somit an der Schwelle zur Frühen Neuzeit, in welcher der Hexenwahn in Mittel- und Zentraleuropa nochmals angefacht wurde. Die Zeit des Wirkens von Weyer und vieler seiner Gegner lässt sich auf die dritte Phase der Hexenverfolgung zwischen 1560 und 1630/80, datieren. Dieser Phase vorangingen in die erste Phase von 1420 bis 1480 und die zweite Phase von 1480 bis 1520. Insgesamt lassen sich die drei Phasen der Hexenverfolgung wie folgt beschreiben: „Generell kann ein Ansteigen der Verfolgungstätigkeit nach 1420, ein Nachlassen zwischen 1520 und 1560, konzentrierte Hexenjagden mit außergewöhnlich hohen Opferzahlen zwischen 1560 und 1630 sowie danach ein langsames Abebben der Hinrichtungen bis 1800 festgestellt werden.“1 Die Verfolgungen der sogenannten Hexen und Zauberer wurden durch zahlreiche Inquisitoren propagiert und zum Ziel für die allgemeine Sicherheit erklärt. Hier hat sich besonders der Dominikanermönch Heinrich Kramer (lat. Institoris) hervorgetan, dem der zweifelhafte Ruhm zukommt, mit dem „Malleus malificorum – Hexenhammer“, einen der frühen Bestseller der Weltgeschichte verfasst zu haben.
    [Show full text]
  • Erasmian Philology and Mathematical Astronomy Jakob Ziegler and the Humanist Recovery of Pliny’S Natural History by Pietro Daniel Omodeo
    JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY HISTORY OF IDEAS 2014 Volume Issue Item a – Section : Articles – Erasmian Philology and Mathematical Astronomy Jakob Ziegler and the Humanist Recovery of Pliny’s Natural History by Pietro Daniel Omodeo c b n a JIHI 2014 Volume Issue Section 1: Editorials . Gastronomy and Revolution (M. Albertone – E. Pasini) Section 2: Articles. Special Issue: Erasmian Science . Erasmian Science (P.D. Omodeo – E. Pasini) . e Fabrist Origins of Erasmian Science: Mathematical Erudition in Erasmus’ Basle (R.J. Oosterho) . Erasmus, Agricola and Mineralogy (F.G. Sacco) . Erasmus and Medicine (S. Mammola) . Erasmus and Geography (N. Ron) . Erasmian Philology and Mathematical Astronomy: Jakob Ziegler and the Humanist Recovery of Pliny’s Natural His- tory, Book Two (P.D. Omodeo). With A Technical Note on Epicyclical Interpretations of Pliny’s Planetary eory (I. Tupikova) Section 3: Notes . Review-Interview. Vox populi. Une histoire du vote avant le suffrage universel, avec O. Christin (M. Albertone) Section 4: Reviews . Book Reviews (C. Carnino, M. Menin) Section 5: News & Notices . Activities of the GISI | Les activités du GISI (-) . Erasmian Philology and Mathematical Astronomy Jakob Ziegler and the Humanist Recovery of Pliny’s Natural History Pietro Daniel Omodeo * In the first half of the ʰ century, humanists associated with Erasmus of Roer- dam gave new impulse to the reception, reading and interpretation of the astro- nomical sections of Pliny’s Natural History. is novel interest is documented by the Basle publication, in , of In C. Plinii de naturali historia librum secundum commentarius (Commentary on Pliny’s Natural History Book Two) authored by Erasmus’s collaborator Jacob Ziegler (-), shortly followed by another commentary composed by Erasmus’ pupil Jacob Milich (-), professor of mathematics in Melanchthon’s Wienberg.
    [Show full text]
  • Concordia Seminary Library, St. Louis Page 1 New Book List As of 5/17/2011 B-BJ [PHILOSOPHY, PSYCHOLOGY, ETHICS]
    Concordia Seminary Library, St. Louis Page 1 New Book List as of 5/17/2011 B-BJ [PHILOSOPHY, PSYCHOLOGY, ETHICS] Stunkel, Kenneth Reagan, 1931-. Relations of Indian, Greek, and Christian thought in antiquity. Washington, D.C. : University Press of America, c1979. (cosl B111 .S78 1979) Reynolds, Noel B. Interpreting Plato's Euthyphro and Meno. Provo, Utah : University Press, Brigham Young University, c1988. (cosl B370 .R49 1988) Machuga, Ric. Life, the universe, and everything : an Aristotelian philosophy for a scientific age. Eugene, Or. : Cascade Books, c2011. (cosl B485 .M23 2011) Alexander, of Aphrodisias. Two Greek Aristotelian commentators on the intellect : the De intellectu attributed to Alexander of Aphrodisias and Themistius' Paraphrase of Aristotle De anima, 3.4-8. Toronto, Ont., Canada : Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, c1990. (cosl B491.I55 A4413 1990) Robillard, Edmond, 1917-2007. Justin : l'itinéraire philosophique. Montréal : Editions Bellarmin ; Paris : Editions du Cerf, 1989. (cosl B675.D53 R63 1989) Philosophy and theology in the long middle ages : a tribute to Stephen F. Brown. Leiden ; Boston : Brill, 2011. (cosl B721 .P485 2011) William, of Auvergne, Bishop of Paris, d. 1249. Selected spiritual writings : Why God became man; On grace; On faith. Toronto : Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, c2011. (cosl B765.G82 E5 2011) Bild und Wort : Mittelalter, Humanismus, Reformation. München : Fink, c1986. (cosl B778 .B55 1986) MacIntyre, Alasdair C. First principles, final ends and contemporary philosophical issues : under the auspices of the Wisconsin-Alpha Chapter of Phi Sigma Tau. Milwaukee : Marquette University Press, 1990. (cosl B804 .M23) Yu, Carver T. Being and relation : a theological critique of Western dualism and individualism.
    [Show full text]
  • „Docendus Est Populus“
    Sonderdrucke aus der Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg HERIBERT SMOLINSKY „Docendus est populus“ Der Zusammenhang zwischen Bildung und Kirchenreform in Reformordnungen des 16. Jahrhunderts Originalbeitrag erschienen in: Walter Brandmüller (Hrsg.): Ecclesia militans : Studien zur Konzilien- und Reformationsgeschichte. Paderborn: Schöningh, Bd. 2: Zur Reformationsgeschichte, 1998, S. [539] - 559 "Docendus est populus" Der Zusammenhang zwischen Bildung und Kirchenreform in Reformordnungen des 16. Jahrhunderts HERIBERT SMOLINSKY / FREIBURG i. Br. Der Ruf nach Reform, der in der Kirche seit den Konzilien von Kon- stanz und Basel nicht mehr unterdrückt werden konnte, wurde durch Martin Luther und die von ihm ausgelöste reformatorische Bewegung unüberhörbar. 1 Jede Gruppe in Kirche und Gesellschaft wurde von ihm erreicht, kaum eine religiöse Lehre oder Praxis blieb von ihm unberührt. Forschungen zur Kirchenreform des 16. Jahrhunderts ha- ben daher ein Ineinander der verschiedensten Komponenten zu be- rücksichtigen: das Weiterleben der alten Ideen, das Vordringen neuer Lehren und die Verstrickung der verschiedenen Gruppen, die sich den Gedanken der Kirchenreform zu eigen machten, mit der Zeitgeschichte.2 Im Umfeld der Römischen Kurie entstanden seit 1523 ebenso wie auf der Ebene der bischöflichen Kirchenpolitik, die z.B. in Süd- deutschland im Rahmen des Metropolitanverbandes Salzburg unter starkem Druck der Bayerischen Herzöge und Österreichs betrieben 1 Vgl. die Überblicke bei F. DrrnucH, Beiträge zur Geschichte der katholi- schen Reformation im ersten Drittel des 16. Jahrhunderts, in: HJ 5 (1884) 319- 398; H. JEDIN, Geschichte des Konzils von Trient, I Freiburg 21951, 1-132; G. ALBERIGO - P. CAMAIANI, Katholische Reform und Gegenreformation, in: SM (D) II (1968) 1078-1107. 2 Vgl. H. SMOLINSKY, Reformationsgeschichte als Geschichte der Kirche.
    [Show full text]
  • From Humanism to the Reformation: Letters of Recommendation in Early Modern Germany (1490-1560)
    From Humanism to the Reformation: Letters of Recommendation in Early Modern Germany (1490-1560) James Milton Kooistra A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Centre for Medieval Studies University of Toronto © Copyright by James Milton Kooistra, 2008 Library and Bibliotheque et 1*1 Archives Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-39884-5 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-39884-5 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives and Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par Plntemet, prefer, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans loan, distribute and sell theses le monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, worldwide, for commercial or non­ sur support microforme, papier, electronique commercial purposes, in microform, et/ou autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. this thesis. Neither the thesis Ni la these ni des extraits substantiels de nor substantial extracts from it celle-ci ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement may be printed or otherwise reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Heilsame Auffsicht Und Verfassung
    Heilsame auffsicht und verfassung Hofordnungen vom Mittelalter bis zur Neuzeit Inaugural‐Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Philosophie (Dr. phil.) durch die Philosophische Fakultät der Heinrich‐Heine‐Universität Düsseldorf vorgelegt von Anja Kircher‐Kannemann aus Duisburg Betreuer: Prof. Dr. Achim Landwehr Zweitgutachterin: Prof. Dr. Eva Schlotheuber Düsseldorf, Oktober 2014 Tag der Disputation, 14. April 2015 D 61 Düsseldorf 2015 i ii Vorwort „Was lange währt wird endlich gut“, so ließe sich mein Promotionsvorhaben wohl am besten überschreiben, denn lang hat es gedauert, wenn man den Zeitpunkt meiner Magisterarbeit als Ausgangspunkt nimmt. Viele Irrungen und Wirrungen folgten auf diese Magisterarbeit und auch ein aufgegebenes Dissertationsprojekt, das nun als Blog wohl doch noch zu Ehren kommen wird. In all den Jahren gab wohl als Einziger mein Mann Ludger nie den Glauben auf. Durch alle Höhen und Tiefen der Dissertation hat er mich begleitet, mir Mut zugesprochen und unerschüt- terlich daran geglaubt, dass ich doch eines wundervollen Tages dieses Monstrum besiegen werde. Dafür möchte ich „Danke“ sagen, auch wenn dieses Wort zu klein dafür ist. Ein weiterer Dank gebührt meinem Doktorvater Prof. Dr. Achim Landwehr, der mich als „altgediente“ Doktorandin und trotz eines aufgegebenen Themas als Doktorandin angenommen hat und mir so einen Neustart ermöglichte. Ganz besonderer Dank gebührt auch meinem Schreibtreff: Ohne Euch hätte ich wohl nie die Kraft gefunden nochmal ganz von vorne anzufangen. Ihr habt meine endlosen Tagespläne ertra- gen und mit Puscheln gewedelt, wenn ich sie geschafft hatte. Ihr habt mich über vier Jahre ange- trieben, die Daumen gehalten und zugehört. Danke! Zum guten Schluss sei noch Frau Prof.
    [Show full text]