The Usual Surprise? Iran’S Presidential Elections by Rouzbeh Parsi

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Usual Surprise? Iran’S Presidential Elections by Rouzbeh Parsi 21 2013 Mehdi Dehghan/AP/SIPA Mehdi The usual surprise? Iran’s presidential elections by Rouzbeh Parsi When the 2009 presidential election in Iran The powers that be took a clear and harsh went awry, and its aftermath rocked the au- stance against the reformists in the aftermath thority and legitimacy of the system (nezam), of the 2009 campaign. On paper, therefore, it seemed that nothing could bring the Islamic the ‘principlists’ had the opportunity to re- Republic back to normalcy. Back then, the next shape the system and the political landscape presidential elections looked far away and be- of the Islamic Republic in their own image, yond anyone’s ability to imagine. Yet, for all with a conservative president and parliamen- other things that can be said about the Islamic tary majority, a cowed, loyal opposition, and Republic, it has insistently and regularly held the military and intelligence-related institu- its presidential polls, wars and political crises tions firmly behind the ‘corrective’ measures. notwithstanding. And now, in 2013, we are Yet this unique configuration did not pro- yet again trying to grapple with the compli- duce a clear set of policies. Nor was any se- cated game of politics in Tehran as the offi- rious attempt made to heal the wounds and cial campaign has started. Doubts exist about rifts that the 2009 elections had engendered. how many citizens will actually go to the polls In addition, Tehran’s relations with the West this time (it was a remarkable 80 per cent in deteriorated further and the impact of new 2009), but the fact that - on 14 June - presi- sanctions on an already mismanaged econo- dential elections are to be held in conjunction my made itself felt. In other words, despite with local and city council votes may increase holding all the levers of power, the ‘princi- the chances of a decent voter turnout. plist’ camp has not governed the country any better nor strengthened its standing in the The paradox of ‘principlism’ world. Why so? Since 2009, the system has had to manage First, ‘principlism’ is primarily defined by its not just the fallout of the elections but also negation of reformism. Hence, without a vi- the final disintegration of the narrative of a able reformist foil, the disparate and motley united ‘principlist’ camp (the term used by nature of the ‘principlists’ becomes painfully those who identify themselves as conserva- apparent. Second, the revolutionary ideology tives on a variety of issues) in Iranian politics. - understood and championed by the ‘prin- European Union Institute for Security Studies June 2013 1 ciplists’ as the singular focus and purpose of control the process and ensure that the ac- the Islamic Republic - is not dominant in the tual contenders come from within the circle country. In fact, the outgoing president him- of those loyal to the system. self, with all his Islamist and revolutionary credentials, cannot be trusted to toe the par- As a result, there is huge discrepancy between ty line. His brand of conservatism does not the number and range of persons registering seem to include sufficient deference to the in order to run in the elections and the small way the networks comprising the nezam op- group of actual candidates eventually allowed erate and, especially, to its core element - the to do so. The vetting is done by the conserv- office and the person of the supreme leader. ative-leaning Guardian Council, which is un- der no obligation to justify its decisions in Third, Iran is neither as frail nor as isolated approving and rejecting candidates. For this as its Western foes would like to claim and presidential campaign, 686 hopefuls had reg- think, despite all the difficulties and provo- istered; the Guardian Council chose eight. The cations of President Ahmadinejad on the in- chosen ones indicate the degree of variation ternational stage. Tehran’s margin of profit, that the system (or rather those wielding its as it were, has shrunk, but it still exists, both levers at the moment) is willing to tolerate. economically and politically. And for some within the religious-political elite in Tehran, The two hopefuls that garnered most atten- the enmity of (and to) the West fits their tion registered in the last half hour before the worldview and suits their political narrative deadline. Esfandiar Rahim Mashaei, former perfectly. vice president to Ahmadinejad and his closest confidante and ally, has been the lightning rod Having said that, of those conservatives there is also a ground- ‘Tehran is a status quo actor, not unlikely who have become swell - domestically increasingly disillu- - for mending fences to prefer negotiations and half-measures sioned with the presi- with the West (with- dent and think his out necessarily suc- that leave all parties sufficiently satisfied policies as not only cumbing to it). Both over confrontations that may or may not reckless but, more public opinion and importantly, insuffi- the political dis- lead to all out victory.’ ciently loyal to the su- course have matured preme leader. The mix and no longer entertain the revolutionary of economic populism and appeal to Iranian notions of re-making the world and oppos- nationalism that the Ahmadinejad-Mashaei ing the world powers. Much of the hardline duo has crafted can be seen as a particularly rhetoric in Tehran has indeed a feel of rear dangerous form of implicit acknowledgement guard action, as if negating and staving off of just how post-revolutionary Iranian soci- the post-revolutionary reality of 21st centu- ety has become. That Mashaei would make it ry Iran; and foreign players reacting to this through the vetting process appeared unlikely rhetoric, paradoxically, help keep up the illu- from the outset – especially in light of the past sion that Iran is a revolutionary country will- two years - though not totally impossible. ing to sacrifice it all for those ideals. Reality, however, is much more mundane: Tehran is a The other main ‘non-candidate’ is two-time status quo actor, not unlikely to prefer nego- president Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani. A tiations and half-measures that leave all par- centrist at heart, he has connections to re- ties sufficiently satisfied over confrontations formists and conservatives alike, and a pedi- that may or may not lead to all out victory. gree second to none (speaker of parliament, confidante of Ayatollah Khomeini, and en- The prelude gineer of the reconstruction of the coun- try in the 1990s after the war with Iraq). The peculiarities of Iran’s presidential elec- He represents the hope of re-adjusting the tion process indicate the split attitude of the course to lower key policy in both the do- nezam towards its own commitment to the mestic and foreign arenas. With him back notion of popular sovereignty. On the one in charge, reformists and others were hop- hand, the system needs to display its inclu- ing for a more professional and steady hand sive character in order to buttress its legiti- at the helm of the state, a manager rather macy. On the other, it is also compelled to than a rabble rouser or ideologue. Consider- European Union Institute for Security Studies June 2013 2 ing his pedigree, his candidacy should have his dismay and shock at the Guardian Coun- been stopped before he actually became a cil’s decision. The very independent-minded potential candidate: discouraging him from conservative MP Ali Motahhari (son of the signing up would have saved everybody face. late Ayatollah Morteza Motahhari, one of the Apparently, however, Rafsanjani felt that he founders of the Islamic Republic) wrote to had enough backing or not enough opposi- the supreme leader as well, stating that if tion, and thus he applied. At that point the Ayatollah Khomeini himself had tried to be- political price for stopping him rose tremen- come a candidate today under a pseudonym, dously. And yet, for some of the more arch- he would have been disqualified. For his part, conservative elements of the ruling elite, this Rafsanjani let it be known that he would not was clearly a price worth paying to stave off appeal the rejection. a course correction to the centre. Rafsanjani, the head of the Expediency Council (which The chosen ones mediates disputes between the Majlis and the Guardian Council) was thus disqualified. The eight candidates that were allowed to run represent the ideal set up for the ‘principlist’ A widely disseminated version of what hap- hardliners. There is one reformist, Mohammad pened behind the scenes was published by Reza Aref, and one centrist, Hassan Rouhani. Jaras, a website affiliated with the reform- Rouhani is an ally of Rafsanjani and is already ist camp. What is in effect channeling interesting is not its ‘On the one hand, the system needs to the hope some voter veracity, or the de- groups attached to tails, but rather what display its inclusive character in order to Rafsanjani as presi- it tells us about the dential contender. deep rifts within the buttress its legitimacy. On the other, it is Rouhani’s criticism circles of power, and also compelled to control the process and of the approach to the cost everyone nuclear negotiations understands reject- ensure that the actual contenders come - and Ahmadinejad’s ing Rafsanjani en- from within the circle of those loyal to policies more gener- tails. According to ally - has been quite Jaras, the original the system.’ sharp, and has not vote in the Guardian stopped. Council was in Rafsanjani’s favour; as this be- came clear, the Minister of Intelligence and Another candidate with a history related to the Commander of the Islamic Revolution Rafsanjani is Mohammad Gharazi.
Recommended publications
  • Robert Asaadi, Department of Political Science, Portland State
    “Institutional Power Sharing in the Islamic Republic of Iran” Robert Asaadi, Department of Political Science, Portland State University 2021 Western Political Science Association Panel: Governance, Identities, Religion and Politics *Please do not cite or circulate without the permission of the author Keywords: Iran; Middle East; Comparative Politics; Political Institutions 1 The Constitution of the Islamic Republic establishes a semipresidential system, where executive power is divided between the supreme leader and the president. Prior to the 1989 constitutional amendments, the system also included a third executive—a prime minister; however, this position was abolished by the amendments, and the office of the presidency was strengthened in its wake. According to the language of the Constitution, the supreme leader’s position (referred to in the text of the Constitution as the “Leader”) is considered separate from the executive, legislative, and judicial branches (which the Constitution refers to as the “three Powers”). Although the supreme leader takes on a number of functions that are commonly associated with these branches of government elsewhere in the world, the position of the “Leader or Council of Leadership” is conceptually distinct from the “three Powers,” and, in fact, is tasked with resolving disputes and coordinating relations between the three branches.i Along with this dispute resolution power, article 110 outlines the ten additional express powers of the Leader: determining the general policies of the political system
    [Show full text]
  • Iran's Presidential Surprise
    18 2013 MARYAM RAHMANIAN/NEWSCOM/SIPAMARYAM Yes they could - Iran’s presidential surprise by Rouzbeh Parsi In case anyone had forgotten that Iranian presi- want to acknowledge that the revolution is over. dential elections have a propensity to surprise us, The splintered landscape on the right reflected a they were reminded over the weekend. Centrist- four-year long, acrimonious blame game among cum-reformist candidate Hassan Rouhani not only the ‘principlists’ that in effect begs the most funda- made a strong showing in the polls but managed mental of questions: what does principlism mean to obtain 50.7 per cent of the vote, thereby elimi- in today’s Iran? nating the need for a second round. The very high turnout, 72 per cent, has given him a clear man- The centrist/reformist part of the approved elector- date as well as confirming the vibrancy and neces- al spectrum proved to be not only more dynamic sity of the electoral process in Iranian politics. Four but also a much more in touch with the fatigue that years after Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s traumatic and many Iranians feel after eight years of protracted controversial re-election, Iranian politics is slowly conservative domination. Thus Mohammad Reza undergoing a course correction - back to allowing Aref, the bona fide reformist, and Hassan Rouhani, for a broader domestic political spectrum. a centrist at heart, quickly became the catalysts of the simmering discontent among the electorate. In fact they both led - and were driven by - a large The electoral dynamics section of society that craved change and acted - in line with the resilient dynamics of Iran politics - as After the selection of officially approved candi- conduits for the expectations and demands from dates, the real campaigning began - with the dif- below.
    [Show full text]
  • The IRGC in the Age of Ebrahim Raisi: Decision-Making and Factionalism in Iran’S Revolutionary Guard
    The IRGC in the Age of Ebrahim Raisi: Decision-Making and Factionalism in Iran’s Revolutionary Guard SAEID GOLKAR AUGUST 2021 KASRA AARABI Contents Executive Summary 4 The Raisi Administration, the IRGC and the Creation of a New Islamic Government 6 The IRGC as the Foundation of Raisi’s Islamic Government The Clergy and the Guard: An Inseparable Bond 16 No Coup in Sight Upholding Clerical Superiority and Preserving Religious Legitimacy The Importance of Understanding the Guard 21 Shortcomings of Existing Approaches to the IRGC A New Model for Understanding the IRGC’s Intra-elite Factionalism 25 The Economic Vertex The Political Vertex The Security-Intelligence Vertex Charting IRGC Commanders’ Positions on the New Model Shades of Islamism: The Ideological Spectrum in the IRGC Conclusion 32 About the Authors 33 Saeid Golkar Kasra Aarabi Endnotes 34 4 The IRGC in the Age of Ebrahim Raisi Executive Summary “The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps [IRGC] has excelled in every field it has entered both internationally and domestically, including security, defence, service provision and construction,” declared Ayatollah Ebrahim Raisi, then chief justice of Iran, in a speech to IRGC commanders on 17 March 2021.1 Four months on, Raisi, who assumes Iran’s presidency on 5 August after the country’s June 2021 election, has set his eyes on further empowering the IRGC with key ministerial and bureaucratic positions likely to be awarded to guardsmen under his new government. There is a clear reason for this ambition. Expanding the power of the IRGC serves the interests of both Raisi and his 82-year-old mentor, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the supreme leader of the Islamic Republic.
    [Show full text]
  • IMAM KHOMEINI's VIEWS Dr. Ghulam Habib
    IMAM KHOMEINI’S VIEWS ON EDUCATION, UNIVERSITIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF FRONT COVER TEACHERS AND ACADEMICIANS Edited by Dr. Ghulam Habib International Association of Muslim University Professors IMAM KHOMEINI’S VIEWS ON EDUCATION, UNIVERSITIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF TEACHERS AND ACADEMICIANS Edited by Dr. Ghulam Habib International Association of Muslim University Professors CONTENTS PREFACE ...........................................................................................................................i SECTION I THE GREAT VALUE OF KNOWLEDGE The Aim of Education and Training .......................................................................... 3 Encouragement to Acquire Knowledge .................................................................... 8 Knowledge and Faith - Belief and Professional Expertise .................................. 15 SECTION 2 UNIVERSITIES BEFORE ISLAMIC REVOLUTION Colonial Culture and Lack of Real Progress ........................................................... 51 Suppression and Attacks on Universities ................................................................ 95 SECTION 3 UNIVERSITY AND CULTURAL REVOLUTION Universities and Anti-Revolutionary Groups ....................................................... 103 The Need for Cultural Revolution ......................................................................... 120 Establishment of Headquarter for Cultural Revolution ...................................... 156 SECTION 4 THE MISSION OF UNIVERSITIES Manufacturing Human Beings ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Guardian Politics in Iran: a Comparative Inquiry Into the Dynamics of Regime Survival
    GUARDIAN POLITICS IN IRAN: A COMPARATIVE INQUIRY INTO THE DYNAMICS OF REGIME SURVIVAL A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Government By Payam Mohseni, M.A. Washington, DC June 22, 2012 Copyright 2012 by Payam Mohseni All Rights Reserved ii GUARDIAN POLITICS IN IRAN: A COMPARATIVE INQUIRY INTO THE DYNAMICS OF REGIME SURVIVAL Payam Mohseni, M.A. Thesis Advisor: Daniel Brumberg, Ph.D. ABSTRACT The Iranian regime has repeatedly demonstrated a singular institutional resiliency that has been absent in other countries where “colored revolutions” have succeeded in overturning incumbents, such as Ukraine, Georgia, Serbia, Kyrgyzstan and Moldova, or where popular uprisings like the current Arab Spring have brought down despots or upended authoritarian political landscapes, including Egypt, Tunisia, Yemen, Libya and even Syria. Moreover, it has accomplished this feat without a ruling political party, considered by most scholars to be the key to stable authoritarianism. Why has the Iranian political system proven so durable? Moreover, can the explanation for such durability advance a more deductive science of authoritarian rule? My dissertation places Iran within the context of guardian regimes—or hybrid regimes with ideological military, clerical or monarchical institutions steeped in the politics of the state, such as Turkey and Thailand—to explain the durability of unstable polities that should be theoretically prone to collapse. “Hybrid” regimes that combine competitive elections with nondemocratic forms of rule have proven to be highly volatile and their average longevity is significantly shorter than that of other regime types.
    [Show full text]
  • The Year in Elections, 2013: the World's Flawed and Failed Contests
    The Year in Elections, 2013: The World's Flawed and Failed Contests The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Norris, Pippa, Richard W. Frank, and Ferran Martinez i Coma. 2014. The Year in Elections 2013: The World's Flawed and Failed Contests. The Electoral Integrity Project. Published Version http://www.electoralintegrityproject.com/ Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:11744445 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA THE YEAR IN ELECTIONS, 2013 THE WORLD’S FLAWED AND FAILED CONTESTS Pippa Norris, Richard W. Frank, and Ferran Martínez i Coma February 2014 THE YEAR IN ELECTIONS, 2013 WWW. ELECTORALINTEGRITYPROJECT.COM The Electoral Integrity Project Department of Government and International Relations Merewether Building, HO4 University of Sydney, NSW 2006 Phone: +61(2) 9351 6041 Email: [email protected] Web: http://www.electoralintegrityproject.com Copyright © Pippa Norris, Ferran Martínez i Coma, and Richard W. Frank 2014. All rights reserved. Photo credits Cover photo: ‘Ballot for national election.’ by Daniel Littlewood, http://www.flickr.com/photos/daniellittlewood/413339945. Licence at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0. Page 6 and 18: ‘Ballot sections are separated for counting.’ by Brittany Danisch, http://www.flickr.com/photos/bdanisch/6084970163/ Licence at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0. Page 8: ‘Women in Pakistan wait to vote’ by DFID - UK Department for International Development, http://www.flickr.com/photos/dfid/8735821208/ Licence at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0.
    [Show full text]
  • Possible Succession Scenarios in Iran
    Possible Succession Scenarios In Iran by Erfan Fard BESA Center Perspectives Paper No. 2,062, June 3, 2021 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A presidential election will take place in Iran on June 18, and it is rumored that Ali Khamenei prefers one candidate above the others: Chief Justice Ebrahim Raisi. While Raisi has never belonged to the IRGC, his election would nevertheless represent a victory for the hardliners. Despite his lack of religious credentials, Raisi is also considered a serious contender to succeed Khamenei as Supreme Leader. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) is the main economic, intelligence, and military power in Iran. While also very strong politically, the Corps has yet to assume full power in the political sphere. The upcoming presidential elections are highly portentous for both the IRGC and the house of Khamenei. Several IRCG commanders announced their desire to run for the presidency, but only one, Mohsen Rezaee—an individual with close ties to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei—was approved as a candidate and placed on the ballot. There are widespread rumors that Khamenei prefers the current Chief Justice, Ebrahim Raisi, over Rezaee for the presidency of the Islamic Republic. Rezaee was a presidential candidate in the 2017 elections but lost to the current incumbent, Hassan Rouhani. Should Raisi triumph in June, his ascent to the presidency over Rezaee would not represent a setback to the IRGC, as he too is closely linked to the Corps. It is highly likely that Raisi will indeed become the next president of Iran. The presidency is not, however, the only pressing internal matter in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Demographics, Laboratory Parameters and Outcomes of 1061 Patients with COVID-19: a Report from Tehran, Iran
    Journal Pre-proof Demographics, laboratory parameters and outcomes of 1061 patients with COVID-19: A report from Tehran, Iran Mihan Pourabdollah Toutkaboni, Elham Askari, Nastaran Khalili, Payam Tabarsi, Hamidreza Jamaati, Ali Akbar Velayati, Atosa Dorudinia, Mitrasadat Rezaei, Seyed Alireza Nadji, Abdolreza Mohamadnia, Neda Khalili PII: S2052-2975(20)30129-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nmni.2020.100777 Reference: NMNI 100777 To appear in: New Microbes and New Infections Received Date: 17 June 2020 Revised Date: 27 September 2020 Accepted Date: 29 September 2020 Please cite this article as: Toutkaboni MP, Askari E, Khalili N, Tabarsi P, Jamaati H, Velayati AA, Dorudinia A, Rezaei M, Nadji SA, Mohamadnia A, Khalili N, Demographics, laboratory parameters and outcomes of 1061 patients with COVID-19: A report from Tehran, Iran, New Microbes and New Infections, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nmni.2020.100777. This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Demographics, laboratory parameters
    [Show full text]
  • Spotlight on Iran1 (January 17 – 31, 2016) Dr
    1 Spotlight on Iran (January 17 – 31, 2016) Dr. Raz Zimmt Overview ü Mohammad-Ali Jafari, commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC), said that one of Iran's major gains from regional developments was the enlistment of more than 200,000 men as fighters in the popular militias in Syria, Iraq and Libya. He said Iran would foil the "Zionist-American plot to divide Iraq and Syria." ü At least five more IRGC fighters were killed in Syria. Since the beginning of the ground offensive in northern Syria more than 135 Iranian fighters have been killed. ü Qasem Soleimani, commander of the IRGC's Qods Force, appeared in public for the first time since reports of his alleged wounding in Syria. He participated in a memorial ceremony for Brigadier General Mohammad-Ali Allahdadi, killed last year in an aerial attack in the region of Quneitra in the southern Golan Heights. ü In American and Iraqi Intelligence assessment, the three Americans who disappeared in Baghdad in the middle of January were abducted by Shi'ite militias with ties to Iran. The Iranian foreign minister promised the American secretary of state he would try to help find the missing men. ü Four Yemeni fighters wounded in the civil war in Yemen who died while receiving medical treatment in Iran were buried in northern Iran despite the reservations of the Iranian Foreign Ministry. Statements from Senior Iranian Officials about Iran's Regional Involvement n Mohammad-Ali Jafari, commander of the IRGC, said Iran would foil the "Zionist- American plot to divide Iraq and Syria," and that Palestine was the Muslim world's main concern.
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly Geopolitical Report by Bill O’Grady
    Weekly Geopolitical Report By Bill O’Grady May 28, 2013 prevent the Green Movement from threatening the government. Elections in Iran For the current election, it appears that (Due to the Memorial Day holiday, the next report will be Khamenei wants to avoid a repeat of the published June 10 th .) 2009 elections at all costs. And so, the Iran’s Guardian Council, the government ayatollah is taking a series of steps to body that certifies candidates for elections, prevent a reoccurrence of the last election. published its list of candidates last week. In this report, we will examine the structure Although over 800 Iranians applied to run of the Iranian government and the history of for president, the council approved a group how this government structure has evolved. of eight. The applications of two prominent From there, an analysis of Khamenei’s goals Iranians were rejected. Former president for the upcoming elections will be offered. Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani and Esfandiar As always, we will examine the Rahim-Hashaei, a close confidant of ramifications of this situation on the President Ahmadinejad, failed to make the financial and commodity markets. list. The Islamic Iranian Republic The last presidential election, which was The interaction of religious and political held in 2009, re-elected Ahmadinejad. power has been fraught with difficulty However, there were widespread claims of throughout history, regardless of the broad voter fraud, and civil unrest followed the religious denomination. Temporal power vote. In something of a surprise, Ayatollah sometimes views spiritual power as a threat. Khamenei, the spiritual head of Iran (and, in At other times, secular powers try to co-opt the convoluted government structure of Iran, religion to enhance its own power.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Khomeinism Executive Summary: Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini
    Khomeinism Executive Summary: Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, founder of the Islamic Republic of Iran and the country’s first supreme leader, is one of the most influential shapers of radical Islamic thought in the modern era. Khomeini’s Islamist, populist agenda—dubbed “Khomeinism” by scholar Ervand Abrahamian—has radicalized and guided Shiite Islamists both inside and outside Iran. Khomeini’s legacy has directly spawned or influenced major violent extremist organizations, including Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), as well as Lebanese-based terrorist organization and political party Hezbollah, and the more recently formed Iraqi-based Shiite militias, many of which stand accused of carrying out gross human rights violations. (Sources: BBC News, Atlantic, Reuters, Washington Post, Human Rights Watch, Constitution.com) Khomeini’s defining ideology focuses on a variety of themes, including absolute religious authority in government and the rejection of Western interference and influence. Khomeini popularized the Shiite Islamic concept of vilayat-e faqih—which translates to “guardianship of the Islamic jurist”— in order to place all of Iran’s religious and state institutions under the control of a single cleric. Khomeini’s successor, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, relies on Khomeinist ideals to continue his authoritarian domestic policies and support for terrorism abroad. (Sources: Al-Islam, Khomeinism: Essays on the Islamic Republic, Ervand Abrahamian, pp. 15-25, Islamic Parliament Research Center, New York Times) More than 25 years after his death, Khomeini’s philosophies and teachings continue to influence all levels of Iran’s political system, including Iran’s legislative and presidential elections. In an interview with Iran’s Press TV, London-based professor of Islamic studies Mohammad Saeid Bahmanpoor said that Khomeini “has become a concept.
    [Show full text]
  • Tightening the Reins How Khamenei Makes Decisions
    MEHDI KHALAJI TIGHTENING THE REINS HOW KHAMENEI MAKES DECISIONS MEHDI KHALAJI TIGHTENING THE REINS HOW KHAMENEI MAKES DECISIONS POLICY FOCUS 126 THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY www.washingtoninstitute.org Policy Focus 126 | March 2014 The opinions expressed in this Policy Focus are those of the author and not necessarily those of The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, its Board of Trustees, or its Board of Advisors. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including pho- tocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. © 2014 by The Washington Institute for Near East Policy The Washington Institute for Near East Policy 1828 L Street NW, Suite 1050 Washington, DC 20036 Cover: Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei holds a weapon as he speaks at the University of Tehran. (Reuters/Raheb Homavandi). Design: 1000 Colors CONTENTS Executive Summary | V 1. Introduction | 1 2. Life and Thought of the Leader | 7 3. Khamenei’s Values | 15 4. Khamenei’s Advisors | 20 5. Khamenei vs the Clergy | 27 6. Khamenei vs the President | 34 7. Khamenei vs Political Institutions | 44 8. Khamenei’s Relationship with the IRGC | 52 9. Conclusion | 61 Appendix: Profile of Hassan Rouhani | 65 About the Author | 72 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EVEN UNDER ITS MOST DESPOTIC REGIMES , modern Iran has long been governed with some degree of consensus among elite factions. Leaders have conceded to or co-opted rivals when necessary to maintain their grip on power, and the current regime is no excep- tion.
    [Show full text]