DOCSLIB.ORG

Jurisprudence of the Moorish Science Temple of America a Body Politic

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jurisprudence of the Moorish Science Temple of America a Body Politic Jurisprudence of the Moorish Science Temple of America A body politic and Corporate The ancient people who have been labeled, classified, identified or “described” as Black, Negro, Colored, Ethiopian, West Indian, Native American, Native Indian, American Indian, Amerindian, Black Indian, Latino, Mexican, Afro American, African American, First People, First Nation, Original People, Asiatics, Aboriginal, Indigenous, Paleo, Pre-Adamite, Autochthon, etc were known to be in the Americas [Hawaii, Alaska, Canada, United States, Central America, South America, Caribbean Islands, Greenland] BEFORE there was an Atlantic Ocean. – (Americas);1 In the Holy Koran of the Moorish Holy Temple of Science, Circle 7, Chapter 47 it’s recorded that “The Inhabitants of Africa are the descendants of the ancient Canaanite from the land of Canaan. Old man Cush and his family are the first inhabitants of Africa who came from the land Canaan. His father Ham and his family were second. Then came the word Ethiopia, which means the demarcation line of the dominion of Amexem, the first true and divine name of Africa. The dividing of the land between the father and the son. The dominion of Cush, North-East and South-East Africa and North-West and South-West was his father’s dominion of Africa. In later years many of their brethren from Asia and the Holy lands joined them. The Moabites from the land of Moab who received permission from the pharaohs of Egypt to settle and inhabit North-West Africa; they were the founders and are the true possessors of the present Moroccan Empire. With their Canaanite, Hittite and Amorite brethren who sojourned from the land of Canaan seeking new homes. Their dominion and inhabitation extended from North-East and South-West Africa, across the great Atlantis even unto the present North, South and Central America and also Mexico and the Atlantis Islands; before the great earthquake, which caused the great Atlantic Ocean.” The Ancient Canaanites, Moabites, and Moors. (This video is from Lord Abba TV) The above pretext of our history along with chapter XLV demonstrates that our right of descent or birthright would include our nationality in present day. It is my research that a nationality is nothing that can be created. As a result of evolution or transition of world affairs, all empires have incorporated in to kingdoms and the nations of the world have formed corporate Governments. This is the nature of construction. This construction in part protects the religious side of temple from antiquity, and manifests as a corporate structure a government for the nation state (Moorish Americans). Now that we are Moorish Americans, where do we politically fit in, within the present world of affairs. There is no true history or standing in the Black Race. And therefore such standing or protection under the present world order. Our slavery is a result of being stripped of our nationality and a historical white-washing of our story. The restorative process was brought by knowledge of self delivered by our prophet coinciding with the fulfillment of a lawful process to restore our Nationality and a Body Politic recognized under the Constitutional and Dejure laws of the world. The foundation provides the political tool, vessel, and Segway into our seat amongst the international affairs of Government. Noble Dru Ali by corrections the matter of our Nationality, and incorporating the Moorish Science Temple of America, in 1928 completed the procedure in Law, to correct the legal dispositions or “status” of the misnomered “Blacks” or worse “African Americans” in the United States of America.2 1 http://moorishamericannationalrepublic.com/news/the-ancient-connection-and-history-of-moors-in-the-caribbean-islands/ 2 http://www.iuom.org/msta/RCA.html Jurisprudence of the Moorish Science Temple of America A body politic and Corporate Noble Dru Ali completed his demonstration in 1928, during or toward the ending of the Pan American Conference 1928, by incorporating a Government Corporation Noble Dru Ali, corrected our legal dis-position by (1) bringing us knowledge of our True nationality (self), and (2) forming a body politic, for us to operate as a Nation (State). This had to be done under the force and affect of the Law, as the window of opportunity existed solely at that time. The Moorish Science Temple is an Autonomous3, (right to self govern), body politic, and civics organization as a result it promotes mutual safety of it’s citizens (nationals) and advantage by joint efforts and combined strength. The Allegory as taught in our history says that we lost our nationality by losing our customs. Evidence of this is the European surname we found ourselves wearing. The surname is a designation of custom and is evidence of your nationality. And this is why upon our awakening, arising, or being freed from bondage, or being corrected in status, we attribute the proper appellation of origin to our surname, (El, Bey, Dey, Ali, Al). We were in slavery, although we are not the children of slaves. The seed of iniquity planted that false narrative. The problem with the narrative that you are children of slaves from Africa, is that a slave and his descendants can never be heirs. This is a result of the laws regarding national descent. This is an operation of international law. The positive law prohibiting slavery, “the practice of” did not correct the matter of those in slavery, nor did it correct or for-see the future problem of generations to come for the lost African-American race of stateless (enslaved) persons. The Supreme Court held that descendants of Africans who were imported into this country, and sold as slaves, were not included nor intended to be included under the word "Citizens" in the Constitution. A slave cannot ever earn rights, or become whole, and for this cause you were not ever slaves, albeit enslaved and sleeping Moors. "You are what your ancient forefathers were without doubt or contradiction. - Noble Dru Ali (YOUR ANCESTORS WERE NOT SLAVES) From the view point of the Law, the Moorish Science Temple of America, incorporated in 1928 is both Defacto and Dejure, in it’s perpetual existence, where as the Majority of temple incorporations and religious corporations of today, exist only in Defacto (defective) status as state entities. The Moorish Science Temple of America is the body politic, for the nation. BODY POLITIC (Bouviers Law Dictionary), government, corporations. When applied to the government this phrase signifies the state. 2. As to the persons who compose the body politic, they take collectively the name, of people, or nation; and individually they are citizens, when considered in relation to their political rights, and subjects as being submitted to the laws of the state. 3. When it refers to corporations, the term body politic means that the members of such corporations shall be considered as an artificial person. The Temple, has the lawful and legal construction of an autonomous organization and a Nation State. However, it is in need of a body and a grand body to actualize it’s function of an autonomous government. Recognition is the consequence of operating the corporate, according to the bye-law and constitution. 3 having the power or right to govern itself Jurisprudence of the Moorish Science Temple of America A body politic and Corporate These highlights are the Laws in Affect regarding the Incorporation of the Moorish Science Temple of America 805 ILCS 110/35, from Ch. 32, par. 164, Sec. 35….. “and upon the filing of the affidavit, as hereinafter provided, it shall be and remain a body politic and corporate, by the name so adopted. “ (805 ILCS 110/38) (from Ch. 32, par. 167) Sec. 38. A failure to elect trustees at any time shall not work a dissolution of such corporation, but the trustees last elected shall be considered as in office until their successors are elected. (Source: Laws 1871-72, p. 296.) International Law (Flag, Treaty, and Constitution) Flag - Flag Treaty - Treaty of Peace and Friendship, (1836) 8 Stat. 484; TS 244-2; 9 Bevans 1286 Treaty with Morroc (Moroccans) “You are what your ancient forefathers were without doubt or contradiction. - Noble Dru Ali” - Those who understand civics and international law know that a Treaty, to be valid has to be acknowledged by other countries and held in depositories in other countries. The treaty are a result of international law setting the international and amicable terms between nations. - The treaty of peace and friendship is the longest standing treaty with the United States. You have a right to nationality https://youtu.be/gbPvuITD20o http://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/11/011-19520827-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf Constitution- To establishes the framework for national law and international policy. The key to the constructing of a nation amongst nations of the earth is one of a legal process. Therefore be aware of what your original constitution says. Noble Dru Ali registered a Religious and Civics corporation under the dejure law. The Civics is deals with the Rights and Privileges of a citizens or nationals for our case. All civil governments have constitutions. The Devine Bylaw and Constitution is our Civics per say. It sets out the structure of the body politic. Jurisprudence of the Moorish Science Temple of America A body politic and Corporate The Law of the MSTA was also ratified by the Religious Corp Validation Act. The Moorish Americans as a body politic are said to be in one state State, when formed under the Moorish Science Temple of America https://www.bizapedia.com/trademarks/moorish-science-temple-of-america-74473343.html see https://www.bitlaw.com/source/tmep/1302.html <---- Collective Membership This is why we should join, and *The words Moorish Science Temple of America should be on your Nationality Card* Bouviers Law Dictionary: BODY POLITIC, 1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Politics of Jurisprudence: Liberty and Equality in Rawls and Dworkin
    The Catholic Lawyer Volume 25 Number 2 Volume 25, Spring 1980, Number 2 Article 4 The Politics of Jurisprudence: Liberty and Equality in Rawls and Dworkin Stephen C. Hicks Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/tcl Part of the Jurisprudence Commons This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Catholic Lawyer by an authorized editor of St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE POLITICS OF JURISPRUDENCE: LIBERTY AND EQUALITY IN RAWLS AND DWORKIN STEPHEN C. HICKS* Law as a general system of rules impartially applied acts as the me- dium of sovereign governmental order harmonizing the interests of indi- viduals and groups in society as equally and fairly as possible. The indi- vidual is free within the rules establishing security and order and is free from law which is not conducive to the general good. Similarly, an indi- vidual is free to pursue his own ends if they are compatible with the greatest happiness of the greatest number and also is free not to act on behalf of the common good. While these boundaries are defined by law, the actual social relations within them are the concern of ethics or psy- chology, not legislation.' Thus, political theory as utilitarianism sees the law according to its own representation of the good and its own descrip- tion of human nature. This is the original coordination of individual soci- ety and the body politic in our tradition.
    [Show full text]
  • The Continental Shelf and the Extension of the Territorial Sea
    University of Miami Law Review Volume 10 Number 4 Miami Law Quarterly Article 5 7-1-1956 The Continental Shelf and the Extension of the Territorial Sea Dr. Theodore Alvarado Garaioca Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umlr Recommended Citation Dr. Theodore Alvarado Garaioca, The Continental Shelf and the Extension of the Territorial Sea, 10 U. Miami L. Rev. 490 (1956) Available at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umlr/vol10/iss4/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Miami Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE CONTINENTAL SHELF AND THE EXTENSION OF THE TERRITORIAL SEA DR. THEODORE ALVARADO GARAIOCA* International Law, influenced by the progress of modern armaments, as well as by the discovery of new natural resources, has had to consider claims tending to modify the traditional determination of the territorial sea, incorporating a new and important element: the so-called continental shelf. It is well to remember that the concept of the "territorial sea" was the subject of a long and arduous discussion. In this inflamed theoretical dispute, several theories were advanced, based upon the opposite principles of the "closed sea" and the "free sea"; the concept of the sea being "rcs nullius" (belonging to nobody) was advanced against the concept of the sea as "res communis" (common to all).
    [Show full text]
  • The Body Politic from Medieval Lombardy to the Dutch Republic
    _full_journalsubtitle: A Journal for the Study of Science, Technology and Medicine in the Pre-modern Period _full_abbrevjournaltitle: ESM _full_ppubnumber: ISSN 1383-7427 (print version) _full_epubnumber: ISSN 1573-3823 (online version) _full_issue: 1 _full_issuetitle: The Body Politic from Medieval Lombardy to the Dutch Republic _full_alt_author_running_head (neem stramien J2 voor dit article en vul alleen 0 in hierna): 0 _full_alt_articletitle_running_head (rechter kopregel - mag alles zijn): The Body Politic: Introduction _full_is_advance_article: 0 _full_article_language: en indien anders: engelse articletitle: 0 The Body Politic: EarlyIntroduction Science and Medicine 25 (2020) 1-7 1 www.brill.com/esm The Body Politic from Medieval Lombardy to the Dutch Republic: An Introduction Vasileios Syros University of Jyväskylä, Finland [email protected] The content of this special issue is based on three of the presentations de- livered at the international conference “The Body Politic and Social Harmony: From the Middle Ages to the Present.” The event was held on 28 and 29 May 2018 at the Meeting and Conference Center Soeterbeeck in Ravenstein, The Netherlands, under the auspices of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW), and corresponded with my appointment as KNAW Visit- ing Professor at the Faculty of Philosophy, Theology and Religious Studies at Radboud University Nijmegen during spring 2017 and spring 2018. The body politic metaphor, widely invoked in envisioning various modes of the existence and operation of a harmonious society, has been an enduring feature in the evolution of political thought, both in the “West” and elsewhere. The conference drew upon the cumulative expertise of scholars from different disciplinary backgrounds. It explored iterations of the body politic metaphor and its normative value for conceptions of social and political harmony from the Middle Ages to the present in the European, Islamic, Jewish, Indian, Rus- sian, and East Asian traditions of political theorizing.
    [Show full text]
  • Gendered Citizenship and Islamic Jurisprudence
    Undergraduate Journal of Global Citizenship Volume 3 Issue 1 The Undergraduate Journal of Global Article 5 Citizenship Volume III Issue I May 2019 Woman In The Body Politic: Gendered Citizenship and Islamic Jurisprudence Ankushi A. Mitra Georgetown University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fairfield.edu/jogc Recommended Citation Mitra, Ankushi A. (2019) "Woman In The Body Politic: Gendered Citizenship and Islamic Jurisprudence," Undergraduate Journal of Global Citizenship: Vol. 3 : Iss. 1 , Article 5. Available at: https://digitalcommons.fairfield.edu/jogc/vol3/iss1/5 This item has been accepted for inclusion in DigitalCommons@Fairfield by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Fairfield. It is brought to you by DigitalCommons@Fairfield with permission from the rights- holder(s) and is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses, you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Mitra: Gendered Citizenship and Islamic Jurisprudence Introduction Scholars contest ‘citizenship’ as a concept on a variety of dimensions – from its conceptual meaning1 to political implementation.2 In his influential classical formulation, T. H. Marshall defines citizenship as “a status bestowed on those who are full members of a community,” 3 equal in their rights and duties. My analytical perspective draws on the Marshallian conceptualization, taking citizenship narrowly to mean legal membership of a political4 community (the nation-state).
    [Show full text]
  • The Metaphor of the “Body Politic” Across Languages and Cultures
    The metaphor of the “body politic” across languages and cultures. Andreas Musolff Published in: Frank Polzenhagen, Zoltán Kövecses, Stefanie Vogelbacher and Sonja Kleinke (eds.). Cognitive Explorations into Metaphor and Metonymy. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang, 85-99. Pre-publication version 1. Introduction (1) Student A: ‘The head of the body represents the Queen of England, as she is in charge of the whole country and she is royalty. The features of the head (eyes, nose, mouth and ears) represent the different official people, such as politicians, the Prime Minister, the Government.’ (2) Student B: ‘Beijing: brain (government); Shanghai: hug/arm (welcome to foreign people); Guangzhen: feet (keep China going); Hong Kong: face (familiar to everyone, representative); Taiwan: hair (we can live without hair but it is necessary for beauty).’ The examples above come from a research corpus1 of answers given by MA students at the University of East Anglia (UEA) who completed the task of describing the body politic of their home country. As can be surmised from the geographical references, the first answer was given by a British student, the second one by a Chinese student. But the two answers do not just differ in terms of geography but reveal a difference in the conceptual structure of the NATION-AS-BODY metaphor.2 The first response describes 1 The research corpus has been built up over the years 2011-13 and is still under construction (see Musolff 2014a in press). 2 Strictly speaking, it would be more accurate to analyse the data as evidence for the NATION-AS-PERSON metaphor, of which the NATION-AS-BODY mapping is a part or 2 aspects of the United Kingdom’s official constitutional system in terms of a (human) body’s head and its various prominent parts.
    [Show full text]
  • Citizens, Residents, and the Body Politic
    Citizens, Residents, and the Body Politic Paul David Meyer* For more than a century, courts and policymakers have described citizenship as a necessary marker of the political community, defining the boundaries of who participates in our democracy and on what terms. State and federal prohibitions on noncitizen voting remain largely unchallenged and immune from public controversy or scholarly scrutiny. Yet recent jurisprudence on citizenship and voting rights may open the doctrinal door for enfranchisement claims brought by lawful permanent residents— those noncitizens with the greatest national stake and standing. This Comment offers two contributions to the discussion of noncitizen suffrage. First, it provides a novel descriptive framework, weaving together parallel developments in the Supreme Court’s thinking about citizenship, the franchise, and the special status of lawful permanent residents in the political community. Second, the Comment presents a normative argument that both responds to deep- seated justifications for upholding blanket voting prohibitions and outlines a limited voting rights regime for lawful permanent residents. Introduction ..................................................................................................... 466 I. Constructing and Dismantling the Citizen as a Repository of Constitutional Rights and Privileges ................................................... 473 A. Citizenship Circa 1787 ................................................................... 474 B. The Fourteenth Amendment’s Construction
    [Show full text]
  • The Debate on Property During the First English Revolution 1647-1659 : a Historical Perspective
    Miranda Revue pluridisciplinaire du monde anglophone / Multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal on the English- speaking world 13 | 2016 Thomas Spence and his Legacy: Bicentennial Perspectives The Debate on Property during the First English Revolution 1647-1659 : A Historical Perspective Myriam-Isabelle Ducrocq Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/miranda/9084 DOI: 10.4000/miranda.9084 ISSN: 2108-6559 Publisher Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès Electronic reference Myriam-Isabelle Ducrocq, “The Debate on Property during the First English Revolution 1647-1659 : A Historical Perspective”, Miranda [Online], 13 | 2016, Online since 17 November 2016, connection on 16 February 2021. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/miranda/9084 ; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/ miranda.9084 This text was automatically generated on 16 February 2021. Miranda is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. The Debate on Property during the First English Revolution 1647-1659 : A Hist... 1 The Debate on Property during the First English Revolution 1647-1659 : A Historical Perspective Myriam-Isabelle Ducrocq 1 The aim of this paper is to provide a historical background to the radical proposals1 formulated by Thomas Spence concerning property, insofar as they are reminiscent of the debates that took place at the time of the First English Revolution. In Crusonia (1782)2, the traveller and narrator describes life in the island where Robinson was once shipwrecked. The island is now populated by the offspring of European sailors and native women, who at first had retained the law of male primogeniture as applied in England, but soon discarded it and opted for new institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 the 'Two Bodies' of the Female Sovereign: Awkward Hierarchies In
    Originalveröffentlichung in: Watanabe-O'Kelly, Helen ; Morton, Adam (Hrsgg.): Queens consort, cultural transfer and European politics, c.1500-1800, London 2017, S. 64-83 4 The ‘two bodies’ of the female sovereign: Awkward hierarchies in images of Empress Maria Theresia, Catherine the Great of Russia and their male consorts Christina Strunck The relationship between ruler and consort, analysed in great depth in the rest of this book, became particularly complicated if the sovereign was a woman. In England this ‘anomalous’ case occurred for the first time in 1553 when Mary 1 ascended the throne. In order to prevent her husband Philip II of Spain from interfering with English politics, in 1554 Parliament issued the Act declaring that the Regal Power of this Realm is in the Queen i Majesty as fully and absolutely as ever it was in any of her most noble Progenitors, Kings of this Realm, thereby enabling Mary to ‘use and enjoy the Crown and Sovereignty over her Dominions and Subjects’ without the assistance of her male consort.1 The idea that the queen held the same powers as a king was more fully developed during the reign of Mary’s successor Elizabeth I. Shortly after Elizabeth’s coronation in 1559 the future Bishop of London John Aylmer published a treatise in which he defended the queen ‘agaynst the late blown Blaste, conceminge the Government of Women’.2 His argument was based on the theory of the king’s two bodies that had been current in England since the Middle Ages. According to this theory the person of the king consisted of a mortal ‘body natural’ and an immortal ‘body politic’.
    [Show full text]
  • THE LOST SOUL of the BODY POLITIC a Dissertation by JESSE ALLEN CHUPP Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&
    THE LOST SOUL OF THE BODY POLITIC A Dissertation by JESSE ALLEN CHUPP Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 2012 Major Subject: Political Science THE LOST SOUL OF THE BODY POLITIC A Dissertation by JESSE ALLEN CHUPP Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved by: Chair of Committee, Cary J. Nederman Committee Members, Robert Harmel Judith Baer Leah DeVun Head of Department, James Rogers May 2012 Major Subject: Political Science iii ABSTRACT The Lost Soul of the Body Politic. (May 2012) Jesse Allen Chupp, B.S., Indiana Wesleyan University; M.A., Ball State University Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Cary J. Nederman The modern nation-state is the product of a gradual process in which the religiously concerned medieval political and ecclesiastical synthesis became more secular and centralized. Mirroring this external institutional development, the theoretical conception of the state changed from one of a natural organic unity of diverse corporate members, often described metaphorically as a Body Politic, to a consent-based compact among atomized individuals. This change can be traced in the Body Politic metaphor of four authors: John of Salisbury, Christine de Pizan, Johannes Althusius, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau. In this project, I argue that the Body Politic metaphor, particularly the inclusion or exclusion of a soul of the Body Politic, is uniquely appropriate for capturing the complexity of political life in general across differing levels of aggregation and for elucidating the political and religious commitments of the authors who employ it, as they critique their own contemporary political and religious institutions and describe their ideal societies.
    [Show full text]
  • Milton's Case for a Free Commonwealth
    Milton’s Case for a Free Commonwealth Frank Lovett Washington University in St. Louis This article will examine the development of John Milton’s arguments for democracy as against monarchy and other sorts of autocratic rule. These arguments are interesting both in their own right and insofar as they shed light on historiographical debates concerning the classical republican tradition. Milton is shown to hold a negative conception of liberty, as opposed to a positive or participatory conception, which lends support to the neo-roman interpretation of that tradition, associated with QuentinSkinnerandPhilipPettit.However,itisfurthershownthatSinnerandPettitmisunderstandtheclassicalrepublicans’ case for democracy, attributing to them a conceptual argument in place of an empirical one. A better understanding of Milton’s political theory contributes to a better understanding of this dilemma, and perhaps suggests a solution. his article will examine the development of “justly and magnanimously abolished” (VII, 409).3 This John Milton’s arguments for a “self-governing shift is particularly striking given the obvious inevitability Tdemocratie or Commonwealth” (VII, 427)1 as of restoration when the latter tract was written, and the against monarchy and other sorts of autocratic rule. These possibility that publishing such a vehemently antimonar- arguments are interesting both in their own right (Milton chical tract might therefore expose Milton to personal is often underestimated as a political thinker),2 and also danger. Would not a more suitable time to express such insofar as they shed light on continuing historiographical sentiments have been during his tenure as Secretary of debates concerning the classical republican tradition to Foreign Tongues for the Commonwealth government in which hebelongs.
    [Show full text]
  • Marsilius of Padua As a Democratic Theorist
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by PhilPapers Roda da Fortuna Revista Eletrônica sobre Antiguidade e Medievo Electronic Journal about Antiquity and Middle Ages Filimon Peonidis1 Marsilius of Padua as a Democratic Theorist Marsilio de Padua como pensador demócrata Abstract: In this essay I focus on the form of government defended by Marsilius of Padua in the first Discourse of Defensor pacis (1324). The interpretation of his overall account depends heavily on our understanding of the “major and valentior part” of the citizenry upon which all legislative and elective powers are bestowed. I argue that there is sufficient textual evidence to believe that the above term refers not to some small elite group but to the totality of citizens or the overwhelming majority of them. I also argue that his imaginary polity meets all the necessary conditions that any political regime should meet in order for it to be characterised as an essentially democratic one. Thus, Marsilius deserves a more prominent position in the history of democratic ideas. Keywords: Marsilius of Padua; popular sovereignty; history of democratic ideas. Resumen: En este ensayo me centro en la forma de gobierno defendida por Marsilio de Padua en el primer discurso del Defensor pacis (1324). La interpretación de la tesis en su conjunto depende en gran medida de cómo entendamos la “pars major” (la parte mayoritaria) y la “pars valentior” (la parte más importante, de mayor peso) de la ciudadanía a la que le son otorgados todos los poderes legislativos y electivos. Sostengo que hay evidencia textual suficiente para creer que el término citado anteriormente no se refiere a una pequeña élite, sino a todos los ciudadanos o a la mayoría de los mismos.
    [Show full text]
  • Syriac Apocalyptic and the Body Politic: from Individual Salvation to the Fate of the State
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Revistes Catalanes amb Accés Obert SYRIAC Apocalyptic AND THE BODY POLITIC: FROM INDIVIDUAL salvation TO THE Fate OF THE State. NOTES ON SEVENTH Century TEXTS PABLO UBIERNA CONSEJO NACIONAL DE INVESTIGACIONES CIENTÍFICAS Y TÉCNICAS UNIVERSIDAD DE BUENOS AIRES ARGENTINA Date of reception: 30th of May, 2010 Final date of acceptance: 19th of January, 2011 ABSTRACT One of the main goals of this paper is to comment on the eschatological notion of “end” as found in a Syriac apocalyptic text of the seventh century, the Syriac Apocalypse of Daniel (or Pseudo-Daniel), recently edited by Matthias Henze and the possible links with the canonical tradition related to the Book of Daniel in the Syriac Bible and to present its own specificity due to the eschatological tone that relates the text with the classical authors of the fourth century like Aphraat. This eschatological tone marks a distance with other Syriac texts of the seventh century with a more political approach1. KEY WORDS Syriac Christianity, Apocalyptic, Byzantium, Apocrypha, Jewish-Christianity. CAPITALIA VERBA Christiana ecclesia Syriaca, Apocalypsis, Byzantium, Apocrypha, Christiana ecclesia Judaica. 1. A previous version of this text was presented as a Lecture at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven on Thursday October 29th 2009 under the premises of the Van Roey's Chair of Oriental Christian Studies. I want to express my gratitude to Prof. Peter van Deun for his invitation and to Prof. Caroline Macé for all her help during my visit to Leuven. IMAGO TEMPORIS.
    [Show full text]