DOCSLIB.ORG

Economic Vitality Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Economic Vitality Study June 2009 Final Technical Report ECONOMIC VITALITY ANALYSIS STUDY Prepared for: County of San Diego Airports Prepared by: McCLELLAN‐PALOMAR AIRPORT 2008 ECONOMIC VITALITY ANALYSIS FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT Prepared for: County of San Diego Airports June 2009 Prepared by: 401 B Street, Suite 600 San Diego, CA 92101 www.kimley‐horn.com Final Technical Report 1 Economic Vitality Analysis 2008 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Final Technical Report 2 2008 Economic Vitality Analysis Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................... 7 Section 1 – STUDY BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................. 9 1.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 9 1.2 Methodology for the Economic Vitality Analysis ................................................................................. 10 1.3 McClellan‐Palomar Airport Overview .................................................................................................. 11 1.4 Regional Socioeconomic Trends .......................................................................................................... 11 1.4.1 City of Carlsbad and North County West MSA ................................................................................. 13 1.4.2 San Diego County .............................................................................................................................. 16 1.5 Current Economic Environment .......................................................................................................... 17 1.5.1 General Aviation Outlook ................................................................................................................. 17 1.5.2 Airline Industry Outlook .................................................................................................................... 19 Section 2 – DIRECT AND INDIRECT ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF AIRPORT ACTIVITY ....................................... 23 2.1 Direct Employment .............................................................................................................................. 23 2.2 Direct Income ....................................................................................................................................... 23 2.3 Direct Revenues ................................................................................................................................... 23 2.4 Indirect Impacts Due to Visitor Spending ............................................................................................ 23 2.4.1 Indirect Employment and Income Generated by Visitor Spending ............................................... 24 2.5 Summary of Direct and Indirect Impacts ............................................................................................. 25 Section 3 – OTHER INDIRECT AND INDUCED ECONOMIC IMPACTS FROM AIRPORT ACTIVITY .................. 27 3.1 Other Indirect Employment, Income, and Revenue ............................................................................ 27 3.2 Induced Employment, Income, and Revenue ...................................................................................... 27 Section 4 – TAX IMPACTS GENERATED BY AIRPORT ACTIVITIES ................................................................. 29 4.1 State and Local Tax Impacts ................................................................................................................. 29 Section 5 – IMPACTS FROM AIRPORT CAPITAL PROJECTS ........................................................................... 31 5.1 Direct Impacts ...................................................................................................................................... 31 5.2 Indirect and Induced Effects ................................................................................................................ 31 Final Technical Report 3 Economic Vitality Analysis 2008 Section 6 – COMPARISON TO OTHER AIRPORTS .......................................................................................... 33 6.1 Comparison with Previous Studies ...................................................................................................... 33 6.2 Comparison with Other Airports .......................................................................................................... 33 6.2.1 Bradley International Airport ......................................................................................................... 33 6.2.2 Bob Hope Airport .......................................................................................................................... 34 6.2.3 Bowman Field Airport .................................................................................................................... 34 6.2.4 Ernest A. Love Field Airport .......................................................................................................... 34 6.2.5 Willow Run Airport ........................................................................................................................ 34 Section 7 – TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACTS AND ESTIMATE OF FUTURE ECONOMIC IMPACTS ..................... 35 7.1 Total Economic Contribution ............................................................................................................... 35 7.2 Estimate of Future Economic Impact ................................................................................................... 36 7.2.1 Growth Scenario One – FAA TAF .................................................................................................... 36 7.2.2 Growth Scenario Two – Designation as a Reliever Airport ............................................................. 37 APPENDICES Appendix A – Airport Data Comparison Table Appendix B – Paper Surveys Final Technical Report 4 2008 Economic Vitality Analysis List of Tables Table 1.1 – Historical and Forecast Population Growth ‐ City of Carlsbad 14 Table 1.2 – Historical and Forecast Employment Growth ‐ City of Carlsbad 14 Table 1.3 – Historical and Forecast Medium Household Income‐City of Carlsbad 15 Table 1.4 – Historical and Forecast Population and Employment Growth – San Diego County 16 Table 2.1 – Off–Airport Impacts Related to Visitor Spending 24 Table 2.2 – Summary of Direct and Indirect Economic Impacts 25 Table 3.1 – Summary of Induced Economic Impacts 28 Table 4.1 – Estimated 2008 State and Local Tax Impacts 29 Table 5.1 – Summary of 2008 Capital Improvement Program Impacts 31 Table 7.1 – Total Economic Impacts of McClellan‐Palomar Airport in 2008 35 Table 7.2 – Estimated 2030 Total Economic Impacts – Growth Scenario One 36 Table 7.3 ‐ Estimated 2030 Total Economic Impacts ‐ Growth Scenario Two 37 List of Exhibits Exhibit 1.1 – Airport Facilities 12 Final Technical Report 5 Economic Vitality Analysis 2008 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Final Technical Report 6 2008 Economic Vitality Analysis EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OVERVIEW INDIRECT IMPACTS McClellan‐Palomar Airport provides valuable Indirect impacts derived primarily from off‐ general aviation, corporate and commercial airport economic activities attributed to services acting as an economic engine for North McClellan‐Palomar Airport air passenger, freight San Diego County and the City of Carlsbad, movement, and other on‐airport aviation California. The global reach of aircraft and business in 2008 included: capabilities of the airport, with its international • Visitors to the area spend an average of customs operations, serve to provide important $273 per day linkage for the County to a global economy. The Airport serves as the gateway to world‐class • $23.34 million of personal income earned resorts and as a means for local and visiting by 692 area employees supported by business people to travel to and from the area to McClellan‐Palomar Airport conduct business. The Airport is a facilitator for • $61.76 million of business sales generated North County jobs. Economic activities related to by visiting passengers for hotels, the Airport generate hundreds of millions of restaurants, retails store local dollars of income and revenue for the transportation and other recreational surrounding local communities. providers STUDY • $2.72 million in personal income earned by A 2008 Economic Vitality Analysis Study was 65 people, and $6.81 million in revenue conducted to assess the importance, value and generated by expenditures with off‐airport economic impact McClellan‐Palomar Airport businesses affords the local community, and to understand • State and local tax revenues of its vitality as an integral transportation element. approximately $5.23 million. DIRECT IMPACTS INDUCED IMPACTS Direct impacts from on‐airport activities Induced impacts reflect the multiplier effects of occurring at McClellan‐Palomar Airport by direct and indirect impacts, resulting from airlines, airport management, fixed base increases in employment and income over and operators, and other tenants in 2008 resulted in above the combined direct and indirect impacts, the following: in the San Diego‐Carlsbad‐San Marcos area. In • $21.96 million in personal income earned 2008, these impacts included: by the 360 people employed at the airport; • 1,446 jobs a top 20 employer in the City • $44.76 million in personal
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Here in Between, It’S Likely That the Challenges Facing the Aviation Industry Are Leading You and Your Family to Plan for Changes in Your Income and Lifestyle
    August 2020 Aero Crew News Your Source for Pilot Hiring and More.. Aero Crew News Your Source for Pilot Hiring and More.. For every leg of your journey AeroCrewNews.com AeroCrewSolutions.com TOP PAY & ADDING 36 ERJ145s in 2020 Train and fly within 3 months Proud Aviate Program Partner Jump to each section Below by clicking on the title or photo. contentsAugust 2020 20 28 22 30 24 Also Featuring: Letter from the Publisher 8 Aviator Bulletins 10 Career Vectors 32 4 | Aero Crew News BACK TO CONTENTS the grid US Cargo US Charter US Major Airlines US Regional Airlines ABX Air Airshare Alaska Airlines Air Choice One Alaska Seaplanes GMJ Air Shuttle Allegiant Air Air Wisconsin Ameriflight Key Lime Air American Airlines Cape Air Atlas Air/Southern Air Omni Air International Delta Air Lines CommutAir FedEx Express Ravn Air Group Frontier Airlines Elite Airways iAero Airways XOJET Aviation Hawaiian Airlines Endeavor Air Kalitta Air JetBlue Airways Envoy Key Lime Air US Fractional Southwest Airlines ExpressJet Airlines UPS FlexJet Spirit Airlines GoJet Airlines NetJets Sun Country Airlines Grant Aviation US Cargo Regional PlaneSense United Airlines Horizon Air Empire Airlines Key Lime Air Mesa Airlines ‘Ohana by Hawaiian Piedmont Airlines PSA Airlines Republic Airways The Grid has moved online. Click on the Silver Airways airlines above to go directly to that airline, Skywest Airlines or go to www.AeroCrewNews.com/thegrid. Star Mania Air, Inc. July 2020 | 5 A FINANCIAL PARTNER TO HELP YOU ALTER COURSE As the ripple effects of this pandemic continue to create turbulence in every area of our daily lives, we understand that you and your loved ones are uncertain about the future of your career, your goals, and your financial security.
    [Show full text]
  • United-2016-2021.Pdf
    27010_Contract_JCBA-FA_v10-cover.pdf 1 4/5/17 7:41 AM 2016 – 2021 Flight Attendant Agreement Association of Flight Attendants – CWA 27010_Contract_JCBA-FA_v10-cover.indd170326_L01_CRV.indd 1 1 3/31/174/5/17 7:533:59 AMPM TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1 Recognition, Successorship and Mergers . 1 Section 2 Definitions . 4 Section 3 General . 10 Section 4 Compensation . 28 Section 5 Expenses, Transportation and Lodging . 36 Section 6 Minimum Pay and Credit, Hours of Service, and Contractual Legalities . 42 Section 7 Scheduling . 56 Section 8 Reserve Scheduling Procedures . 88 Section 9 Special Qualification Flight Attendants . 107 Section 10 AMC Operation . .116 Section 11 Training & General Meetings . 120 Section 12 Vacations . 125 Section 13 Sick Leave . 136 Section 14 Seniority . 143 Section 15 Leaves of Absence . 146 Section 16 Job Share and Partnership Flying Programs . 158 Section 17 Filling of Vacancies . 164 Section 18 Reduction in Personnel . .171 Section 19 Safety, Health and Security . .176 Section 20 Medical Examinations . 180 Section 21 Alcohol and Drug Testing . 183 Section 22 Personnel Files . 190 Section 23 Investigations & Grievances . 193 Section 24 System Board of Adjustment . 206 Section 25 Uniforms . 211 Section 26 Moving Expenses . 215 Section 27 Missing, Interned, Hostage or Prisoner of War . 217 Section 28 Commuter Program . 219 Section 29 Benefits . 223 Section 30 Union Activities . 265 Section 31 Union Security and Check-Off . 273 Section 32 Duration . 278 i LETTERS OF AGREEMENT LOA 1 20 Year Passes . 280 LOA 2 767 Crew Rest . 283 LOA 3 787 – 777 Aircraft Exchange . 285 LOA 4 AFA PAC Letter . 287 LOA 5 AFA Staff Travel .
    [Show full text]
  • Runway Excursion During Landing, Delta Air Lines Flight 1086, Boeing MD-88, N909DL, New York, New York, March 5, 2015
    Runway Excursion During Landing Delta Air Lines Flight 1086 Boeing MD-88, N909DL New York, New York March 5, 2015 Accident Report NTSB/AAR-16/02 National PB2016-104166 Transportation Safety Board NTSB/AAR-16/02 PB2016-104166 Notation 8780 Adopted September 13, 2016 Aircraft Accident Report Runway Excursion During Landing Delta Air Lines Flight 1086 Boeing MD-88, N909DL New York, New York March 5, 2015 National Transportation Safety Board 490 L’Enfant Plaza, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20594 National Transportation Safety Board. 2016. Runway Excursion During Landing, Delta Air Lines Flight 1086, Boeing MD-88, N909DL, New York, New York, March 5, 2015. Aircraft Accident Report NTSB/AAR-16/02. Washington, DC. Abstract: This report discusses the March 5, 2015, accident in which Delta Air Lines flight 1086, a Boeing MD-88 airplane, N909DL, was landing on runway 13 at LaGuardia Airport, New York, New York, when it departed the left side of the runway, contacted the airport perimeter fence, and came to rest with the airplane’s nose on an embankment next to Flushing Bay. The 2 pilots, 3 flight attendants, and 98 of the 127 passengers were not injured; the other 29 passengers received minor injuries. The airplane was substantially damaged. Safety issues discussed in the report relate to the use of excessive engine reverse thrust and rudder blanking on MD-80 series airplanes, the subjective nature of braking action reports, the lack of procedures for crew communications during an emergency or a non-normal event without operative communication systems, inaccurate passenger counts provided to emergency responders following an accident, and unclear policies regarding runway friction measurements and runway condition reporting.
    [Show full text]
  • B T P S Journal of Transport Literature JTL|RELIT Vol
    B T P S Journal of Transport Literature JTL|RELIT Vol. 8, n. 2, pp. 38-72, Apr. 2014 Brazilian Transportation www.transport-literature.org Planning Society Research Directory ISSN 2238-1031 Measurement of a cost function for US airlines: restricted and unrestricted translog models [Mensuração de uma função de custo para companhias aéreas norte-americanas: modelos translog restritos e irrestritos] William J. Meland* University of Minnesota - United States Submitted 7 Jan 2013; received in revised form 28 Mar 2013; accepted 16 Jun 2013 Abstract This paper continues and expands several themes from previous studies of commercial airline cost functions. A well specified industrial cost function reveals characteristics about the market players, such as economies of scale and the cost elasticities with respect to operational styles. Using a translog specification, and its restricted first-order form, this paper updates previous parameter estimates, reworks the experimental design, and gives new analysis to describe the spectrum of choices facing airline firms in recent years. The translog model in this paper allows the energy cost share to interact with other variables and illuminate what factors may exacerbate cost sensitivity to energy prices, an advance in this specific area of interpretation. The result shows that fuel cost shares tend to be higher with older equipment, smaller fleet sizes, and to be increasing in aircraft size and seating density. The restricted first-order model indicates that older aircraft designs are more costly to operate, even accounting for operational style. This may imply that airlines with poorer access to capital suffer a cost disadvantage, particularly during a fuel spike – also a new contribution of the paper.
    [Show full text]
  • February 2018 Editor C
    WE FLY WITH Teaching the world CARE… to fly! Now With all the aircraft you more need from the first flight than 2631 E. Spring Street / Long Beach, CA 90806 / 562-290-0321 hour to an airline job and eve visit us: at www.Lbflying.com email: [email protected] everything in between! FEBRUARY 2018 EDITOR C. ROBINSON WHAT’S UP — LOTS AT LGB AOA REBADGE INFORMATION Last month, Hawaiian Airlines announced that it ALL AOA badge holders will launch service from Long Beach Airport to Honolulu International Airport on June 1. The daily Your current AOA badge will no longer be valid after flights will depart Long Beach at 8:30 am and arrive in February 16, 2018. Honolulu at 11:40 am. The return service will leave Honolulu at 12:30 pm with a 9 pm arrival in Long Beach. Hawaiian's You may NOT enter the AOA access area unless you website lists round-trip flights starting at $557 for travel Mondays have a new badge issued with the new LGB logo on it. through Thursdays during the first three weeks of June. Old badges will be confiscated and you will be escorted off the airfield by the airport authorities if you are on Long Beach Airport Exploring Fine Increases For Noise Violations the AOA with an old badge after February 16, 2018. — from Long Beach Business Journal Please get your rebadge paperwork at the Dispatch desk. On January 18, the city’s airport advisory commission held the first When completed please turn it in for a signature.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Consumer Protection Division Issued: May 2018
    1 U.S. Department of Transportation Air Travel Consumer Report A Product Of The OFFICE OF AVIATION ENFORCEMENT AND PROCEEDINGS Aviation Consumer Protection Division Issued: May 2018 Flight Delays1 March 2018 Mishandled Baggage1 March 2018 January - March 2018 Oversales1 1st. Quarter 2018 Consumer Complaints2 March 2018 (Includes Disability and January - March 2018 Discrimination Complaints) Airline Animal Incident Reports4 March 2018 Customer Service Reports to 3 the Dept. of Homeland Security March 2018 1 Data collected by the Bureau of Transportation Statistics. Website: http://www.bts.gov 2 Data compiled by the Aviation Consumer Protection Division. Website: http://www.transportation.gov/airconsumer 3 Data provided by the Department of Homeland Security, Transportation Security Administration 4 Data collected by the Aviation Consumer Protection Division 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Section Page Page Flight Delays (continued) Introduction Table 8 31 3 List of Regularly Scheduled Domestic Flights with Tarmac Flight Delays Delays Over 3 Hours, By Marketing/Operating Carrier Explanation 4 Table 8A 32 Branded Codeshare Partners 5 List of Regularly Scheduled International Flights with Table 1 6 Tarmac Delays Over 4 Hours, By Carrier Overall Percentage of Reported Flight Appendix 33 Operations Arriving On Time, by Marketing Carrier Mishandled Baggage Table 1A 7 Explanation 34 Overall Percentage of Reported Flight Ranking 35 Operations Arriving On Time, by Operating Carrier Ranking— (Year-to-Date) 36 Table 1B 8 Oversales Overall Percentage of Reported Flight Explanation 37 Operations Arriving On Time, by Marketing Carrier, Rank Ranking — (Quarterly) 38 By Month, and Year-to-Date (YTD) Ranking— (Year-to-Date) 39 Table 2 9 Consumer Complaints Number of Reported Flight Arrivals and Percentage Explanation 40 Arriving On Time, by Marketing Carrier and Airport Complaint Tables 1-5 41 Table 2A 13 Summary, Complaint Categories, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Charters 2018.Xlsx
    CHARTER REPORT ‐ 2018 PROSPECTUSES Total No. Of Type of Aircraft Charter Operator* Carrier* Origin Destination Beginning Date Ending Date Remarks/Indirect Carriers Flights # oft sts Superior Air Charter dba JetSuite PHENOM 300 18-001 JetSmarter, Inc. Air (air taxi) OAK LAS 1/30/2018 1/30/2018 1 w/7 guests Ciation CJ2 18-002 JetSmarter, Inc. Flyexclusive (air taxi) FLL TED 1/30/2018 1/30/2018 1 w/6 guests Piper Navajo 18-003 Public Charters dba Regional Sky Public Charters (commuter) MBL MDW 3/1/2018 65/4/18 CANCELLED w/8 sts 737-700/800 18-004 Holiday Express Southwest Airlines PHL MCO 3/6/2018 4/28/2018 32 w/175 sts Boeing 737-400 18-005 RISA TRAVEL TEM Enterprises dba Xtra Airways MIA PUJ 6/9/2018 8/23/2018 18 w/159 sts Hawker 800 18-006 JetSmarter, Inc. Jet-A (air taxi) FLL HPN 3/3/2018 3/3/2018 1 w/8 guests Dolphin Atlantic/Gold Aviation PHENOM 300 18-007 JetSmarter, Inc. Services (air taxi) KBCT KFRG 3/3/2018 3/3/2018 1 w/7 guests Dornier 328 Jet Ultime JETCHARTERS dba w/30 sts Ultimate Air Shuttle/ Public Ultimate JETCHARTERS dba Embraer 135 Jet 18-008 Charters (co-charterer) Ultimate Air Shuttle LUK PDK 3/20/2018 5/31/2018 52 w/30 sts Pilatus PC-12 18-009 JetSmarter, Inc. New Englad Air Transport (air taxi) FKK MYNN 2/8/2018 2/8/2018 1 w/6 guests 1 7/24/2018 CHARTER REPORT ‐ 2018 PROSPECTUSES HAV-MIA-SCU-HOG- 737-800 18-010 ViajeHoy dba Havana Air Swift Air, LLC MIA-TPA TPA-HAV 2/1/2018 1/31/2019 1,780 w/172 psgrs MN Airlines dba Sun Country MN Airlines dba Sun Country 18-011 Airlines Airlines MSP PHL 1/21/2018 1/21/2018 2 737-800 w/168 sts King Air B200 18-012 JetSmarter, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • TED STEVENS ANCHORAGE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Anchorage, Alaska
    TED STEVENS ANCHORAGE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Anchorage, Alaska PFC Quarterly Report - Receipts Collected For the Quarter Ended March 31,2009 (Application No. 1 ) Application #99-01-C-00-ANC & 99-01-C-01-ANC $22,000,000.00 0.00 Total Collection Authority $22,000,000.00 PFC Revenue Received Air Carriers Current Quarter Previous Quarters Cumulative Aces Airlines 32.12 32.12 Aer Lingus 317.44 317.44 Aerovias De Mexico 122.58 122.58 Aero Mexico 98.53 98.53 Air Canada 136,476.21 136,476.21 Air France 1,764.99 1,764.99 Air New Zealand 2,094.33 2,094.33 Air Pacific 8.67 8.67 Airlines Services Corporation 37.96 37.96 Air Wisconsin Airlines 46.54 46.54 Alaska Airlines 11,024,874.06 11,024,874.06 Alitalia Airlines 1,051.51 1,051.51 All Nippon Airways Co 1,905.64 1,905.64 Aloha Airlines 7,152.82 7,152.82 America Central Corp 23.36 23.36 America West Airlines 228,474.04 228,474.04 American Airlines 509,508.22 509,508.22 American Trans Air 6,513.14 6,513.14 Asiana Airlines 2,125.95 2,125.95 Atlantic Coast Airline 96.36 96.36 Avianca 8.76 8.76 Big Sky Airlines 87.36 87.36 British Airways 12,272.36 12,272.36 Canada 3000 10,999.72 10,999.72 Cathay Pacific Airways 271.27 271.27 China Airlines 78,473.09 78,473.09 Condor Flugdienst, GMBH 63,889.95 63,889.95 Continental Airlines 1,380,859.31 1,380,859.31 Czech Airlines 348.36 348.36 Delta Airlines 1,673,182.33 1,673,182.33 Elal Israel Airlines 110.74 110.74 Emirates 14.57 14.57 Era Aviation, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Low Cost Carriers: How Are They Changing the Market Dynamics of the U.S
    Low Cost Carriers: How Are They Changing the Market Dynamics of the U.S. Airline Industry? by Erfan Chowdhury An Honours essay submitted to Carleton University in fulfillment of the requirements for the course ECON 4908, as credit toward the degree of Bachelor of Arts with Honours in Economics. Department of Economics Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario April 26, 2007 Abstract : The year 1978 was a landmark year for the airline industry. It was the year the airline deregulation was introduced in the United States. Following the deregulation, many airlines set up operation across the country and started to challenge the dominance of traditional full service carriers (FSC) which translated to better service and lower fares for the consumers. However, the initial success of deregulation was short lived and by the late 1980’s most of the newly formed airlines either went out of business or was purchased by their FSC rivals. In spite of this, by the mid 1990’s, a new breed of airlines called low cost carriers (LCC) started to challenge the dominance of full service carriers in the short haul market. The LCCs did not provide any frills such as meals or in-flight-entertainment, but offered ultra low fares on short haul point to point routes. Today, LCCs have a strong presence in every market segment across the U.S with one third share of the domestic air travel market.. This paper will study how the LCC’s are winning the battle against the full service carriers and how the strong presence of LCCs has impacted the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) System Wide Information Management (SWIM) Industry Collaboration Workshop A
    Minutes of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) System Wide Information Management (SWIM) Industry Collaboration Workshop and Full SWIM Industry-FAA Team (SWIFT) Meeting #9 February 25th and 26th, 2020 FedEx University Institute of Technology The Zone, The University of Memphis, 365 Innovation Drive, Memphis, Tennessee 38152 Day One - SWIM Developer’s Workshop 1. Doors Open & Registration: 1.1. The meeting was held at the FedEx University Institute of Technology, 365 Innovation Drive, The Zone, The University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee 38152 on February 25th, 2020 at 1 PM. The half-day SWIM Developers Workshop was the first workshop of its kind for the FAA SWIFT program and was called to order by Josh Gustin, FAA Communications, Information, and Network Programs (CINP) Group Manager within the Program Management Organization (PMO). 2. Introduction/Welcome: 2.1. Welcoming Remarks – Josh Gustin, Felisa White (FAA SWIFT Fed Lead) 2.1.1. Introduced the SWIM Developers Workshop as a series of discussions/interactive engagements focused on airlines and other consumers wanting to connect and use the data delivered by SWIM, specifically through the SWIM Cloud Distribution Service (SCDS). 2.2. Described the positive outcomes SWIM has achieved educating consumers how to access data and more recently developed Operational Context Documents (OCDs) to assist consumers to understand what individual data elements mean. 3. SWIM 101/Overview of SWIFT – (David Almeida – LS Technologies) 3.1. SWIFT has been charged with bringing together FAA and Industry entities from information technology, operation research, and business analysts. Together the collective goal is to demystify SWIM, reduce barriers effectively and rapidly using SWIM data, and coordinate and collaborate with industry to move SWIM-based collaborative decision-making forward.
    [Show full text]
  • May 28, 2015 Ted Dean Deputy Assistant Secretary for Services U.S. Department of Commerce International Trade Division 1401 Cons
    May 28, 2015 Ted Dean Deputy Assistant Secretary for Services U.S. Department of Commerce International Trade Division 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Suite 11030 Washington, DC 20230 Thomas Engle Deputy Assistant Secretary for Transportation Affairs U.S. Department of State Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs 2201 C Street NW, Room 3425 Washington, DC 20520 Brandon M. Belford Deputy Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room W88324 Washington, DC 20590 Re: Comments of the Air Line Pilots Association, International (ALPA) Concerning Gulf Carrier Subsidies Dockets DOC‐2015‐0001; DOS‐2015‐0016; DOT‐OST‐2015‐0082 Dear Messrs. Dean, Engle, and Belford: On behalf of its 48,000 U.S. members, ALPA submits the following comments on the issue of the subsidies provided by the governments of the United Arab Emirates (“UAE”) and Qatar to their airlines, Emirates Airline, Etihad Airways, and Qatar Airways (“the Gulf Carriers”). Ted Dean Page 2 Thomas Engle Brandon M. Belford May 28, 2015 I. Summary of ALPA’s Position Delta Air Lines, United Airlines, and American Airlines (“the U.S. Carriers”), have presented evidence to the Departments of Commerce, State and Transportation that makes out a prima facie case of unfair, market‐distorting government subsidy support for the passenger‐carrying Gulf Carriers. See “Restoring Open Skies: The Need to Address Subsidized Competition from State‐Owned Airlines in Qatar and the UAE,” Jan. 28, 2015 (“White Paper”) and attached expert reports (or “exhibits”), available at http://www.openandfairskies.com/subsidies (last visited May 28, 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • March 2012 Newsletter
    PilotsPROUDLY For C ELEBRATINGKids Organization 29 YEARS! Pilots For KidsSM ORGANIZATION Helping Hospitalized Children Since 1983 Newsletter March 2012 Detroit PFK members delivered lots of smiles, Pillow Pets and other gifts to hospitalized children at three Detroit area facilities in December and January. These joyous faces are representative of the many happy children around the country thanks to the hard work of many, many PFK members who generously donated time and money to this worthy cause and to the Pillow Pets organization that donated over 6000 snuggly pets for the children to love! SAVE THE DATE PFK Dallas/Fort Worth Golf Tournament Monday, May 21, 2012 (details on page 11) PFK Orlando Golf Tournament Saturday, October 6, 2012 (details on page 12) “100% of our donations go to the kids” visit us at: pilotsforkids.org (2) Pilots For Kids Organization CITY: Point Pleasant, NJ President’s Corner... COORDINATOR: Rod Biggs Dear Members, PARTICIPANTS: American, USAF and UPS I once read that a well run charitable organization is operated just like a well run business. Sound advice, don’t you think? Interesting, as that Lots of smiles were evident as Coordinator Rod Biggs has been your board’s guidance all along. and his happy group of volunteers visited young pa- In keeping with that philosophy, and tients during their annual visit to Jersey Shore Medical direction from our talented CPA, we introduced Center. They handed out Pillow Pets and lots of other the acceptance of credit cards for donations last welcome gifts during their annual hospital visit. Mrs. year. Fees for those donations were absorbed by Claus and Captain Baldy were there for an enjoyable the organization.
    [Show full text]