DOCSLIB.ORG

Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) – 2009-2014 Version

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) – 2009-2014 Version Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) – 2009-2014 version Available for download from http://www.ramsar.org/doc/ris/key_ris_e.doc and http://www.ramsar.org/pdf/ris/key_ris_e.pdf Categories approved by Recommendation 4.7 (1990), as amended by Resolution VIII.13 of the 8th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2002) and Resolutions IX.1 Annex B, IX.6, IX.21 and IX. 22 of the 9th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2005). Notes for compilers: 1. The RIS should be completed in accordance with the attached Explanatory Notes and Guidelines for completing the Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands. Compilers are strongly advised to read this guidance before filling in the RIS. 2. Further information and guidance in support of Ramsar site designations are provided in the Strategic Framework and guidelines for the future development of the List of Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar Wise Use Handbook 17, 4th edition). 3. Once completed, the RIS (and accompanying map(s)) should be submitted to the Ramsar Secretariat. Compilers should provide an electronic (MS Word) copy of the RIS and, where possible, digital copies of all maps. 1. Name and address of the compiler of this form: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY. Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and DD MM YY Environment (DPIPWE) GPO Box 44 HOBART Tasmania 7001 Australia Designation date Site Reference Number +61 3 6165 4396 [email protected] 2. Date this sheet was completed/updated: May 2014 3. Country: Australia 4. Name of the Ramsar site: The precise name of the designated site in one of the three official languages (English, French or Spanish) of the Convention. Alternative names, including in local language(s), should be given in parentheses after the precise name. Pitt Water-Orielton Lagoon 5. Designation of new Ramsar site or update of existing site: This RIS is for (tick one box only): a) Designation of a new Ramsar site ; or b) Updated information on an existing Ramsar site 6. For RIS updates only, changes to the site since its designation or earlier update: a) Site boundary and area The Ramsar site boundary and site area are unchanged: or Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS), page 2 If the site boundary has changed: i) the boundary has been delineated more accurately ; or ii) the boundary has been extended ; or iii) the boundary has been restricted** and/or If the site area has changed: i) the area has been measured more accurately ; or ii) the area has been extended ; or iii) the area has been reduced** ** Important note: If the boundary and/or area of the designated site is being restricted/reduced, the Contracting Party should have followed the procedures established by the Conference of the Parties in the Annex to COP9 Resolution IX.6 and provided a report in line with paragraph 28 of that Annex, prior to the submission of an updated RIS. In 2001, the boundary of the Pitt Water-Orielton Lagoon Ramsar site was mapped more accurately using an updated coverage of the high water mark. The area was recalculated to 3334ha. The boundary of the site remains the same. The revised area was provided in the 2005 RIS update for this site. b) Describe briefly any major changes to the ecological character of the Ramsar site, including in the application of the Criteria, since the previous RIS for the site: No major changes noted since previous RIS. However, changes are noted since the original listing of the site in 1982. Recent studies have shown that changes have occurred in the flow regime of the Coal River, the principal source of freshwater input, as a consequence of dam construction. Flows are now lower overall, peak seasons reversed from winter to summer and flushing flows have ceased. Seagrass beds in the estuary appear to have declined considerably in extent and fish populations are reported to have also declined. The extent of saltmarshes has declined and floristics of some saltmarshes has altered. The Rolling Review (2011) indicated that there was insufficient monitoring of indicators to determine whether there was a change in ecological character at the site. There have also been some improvements at the site. The construction of box culverts with sills at mid- tide level and additional drains has improved tidal exchange and circulation though the lagoon. A 2012 shorebird and seabird survey recorded 62 breeding pairs of Australian Pied Oystercatchers Haematopus longirostris (Woehler 2013) which is in the range of 1% of the global population estimates (11,000 – 14,000 birds, Wetlands International 2006). It is possible that the site may also meet Criterion 6. However, ongoing monitoring is required to demonstrate that the site regularly supports 1% of the population in order to meet Criterion 6. Birds that utilise the site are listed at Appendix 1. 7. Map of site: Refer to Annex III of the Explanatory Note and Guidelines, for detailed guidance on provision of suitable maps, including digital maps. a) A map of the site, with clearly delineated boundaries, is included as: i) a hard copy (required for inclusion of site in the Ramsar List): ; ii) an electronic format (e.g. a JPEG or ArcView image) (Figure 1); iii) a GIS file providing geo-referenced site boundary vectors and attribute tables . b) Describe briefly the type of boundary delineation applied: e.g. the boundary is the same as an existing protected area (nature reserve, national park, etc.), or follows a catchment boundary, or follows a geopolitical boundary such as a local government jurisdiction, follows physical boundaries such as roads, follows the shoreline of a waterbody, etc. Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS), page 3 The boundary of Pitt Water-Orielton Lagoon Ramsar site includes all of allotment 1 on Central Plan Register (CPR) 5776 from the Tasmanian Information and Land Services, Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment. CPR 5776 horizontal datum is Australian Geodetic Datum (AGD66) Universal Transverse Mercator Projection Australian Map Grid (UTM AMG66) and Australian Height Datum (Tasmania) for vertical datum (Figure 2). Cadastral information about surrounding land parcels can be obtained from the Land Information System Tasmania (LIST) mapping site http://maps.thelist.tas.gov.au/listmap/app/list/map 8. Geographical coordinates (latitude/longitude, in degrees and minutes): Provide the coordinates of the approximate centre of the site and/or the limits of the site. If the site is composed of more than one separate area, provide coordinates for each of these areas. 42° 47' 56.53"S, 147° 30' 37.95"E 9. General location: Include in which part of the country and which large administrative region(s) the site lies and the location of the nearest large town. The wetland is located on the south-east coast of Tasmania, approximately 20 kilometres east of the city of Hobart, between the towns of Cambridge, Richmond and Sorell. The eastern area of the site lies within the Sorell Municipality (approximately 12,500 residents), and the western area in the Clarence Municipality (approximately 50,500 residents). The boundary for the most part follows high water mark and property boundaries but also includes several areas comprising the Pitt Water Nature Reserve while the southern boundary follows a direct line across the open basin of Pitt Water. 10. Elevation: (in metres: average and/or maximum & minimum) The whole site is less than 20m ASL 11. Area: (in hectares) 3,334 ha 12. General overview of the site: Provide a short paragraph giving a summary description of the principal ecological characteristics and importance of the wetland. The Pitt Water-Orielton Lagoon (PWOL) Ramsar site comprises the uppermost parts of a wave- dominated barred estuary. The principal features are the channel and mouth of the Coal River estuary, Orielton Lagoon, a large embayment now almost closed by a causeway, and an extensive area of open marine waters. PWOL supports a diversity of coastal, intertidal and marine habitats and communities, and is therefore a species-rich environment. Orielton Lagoon is the most southerly site included on the Flyway Site Network of the East-Asian – Australasian Partnership. The area includes most of the saltmarsh vegetation communities found in Tasmania. 13. Ramsar Criteria: Tick the box under each Criterion applied to the designation of the Ramsar site. See Annex II of the Explanatory Notes and Guidelines for the Criteria and guidelines for their application (adopted by Resolution VII.11). All Criteria which apply should be ticked. 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 8 • 9 14. Justification for the application of each Criterion listed in 13 above: Provide justification for each Criterion in turn, clearly identifying to which Criterion the justification applies (see Annex II for guidance on acceptable forms of justification). Criterion 2: A wetland should be considered internationally important if it supports vulnerable, endangered, or critically endangered species or threatened ecological communities. Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS), page 4 Common Name Scientific Name IUCN CITES CMS National Status Status Status (EPBC Act*) Tasmanian Live- Patiriella Vulnerable bearing Seastar (=Parvulastra) vivipara Swift Parrot Lathamus discolour Vulnerable Endangered Wedge-tailed eagle Aquila audax fleayi Vulnerable Vulnerable (Tasmanian) Fairy Tern Sterna nereis Vulnerable Endangered Sub Specices Sternula nereis nereis Eastern Curlew Numenius Vulnerable madagascariensis Subtropical and Vulnerable Temperate (listed 2013) Coastal Salt marsh *Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. Criterion 3: A wetland should be considered internationally important if it supports populations of plant and/or animal species important for maintaining the biological diversity of a particular biogeographic region. PWOL is an important area for maintaining biodiversity of saltmarshes, birds and fish. The estuary is fringed with saltmarshes hosting different facies of vegetation communities and species. Although the area of saltmarsh within the Ramsar boundary encompasses only about 3.5 per cent of the estimated total area of saltmarsh in Tasmania, the floristic communities include 12 of the 15 identified by Kirkpatrick and Glasby (1981).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sorell Council Annual Report 2009-2010
    S O R ELL C OUN CI L ANNU A L R E P O R T 2 0 0 9 - 1 0 www.sorell.tas.gov.au Contents CONTENTS PAGE Annual Report 2009-10 About Us 3 Our Vision, Our Mission, Our Organisational Values 11 Mayor’s Message 13 General Manager’s Report 14 Your Councillors 15 People at Council 16 Sorell Scarecrow Trail 19 Finance & Information 20 Human Resources & Community Services 23 Environment & Development 26 Engineering Services 29 The Way We Plan 31 Legislative Requirements 39 Financials Snapshots 43 General Purpose Financial Report 47 Independent Audit Report 90 Appendix A - Council Owned Halls 91 12 Somerville Street, Sorell TAS 7172 PO Box 126, Sorell TAS 7172 Phone 6269 0000 Fax 6269 0014 Email [email protected] www.sorell.tas.gov.au Sorell Council Annual Report 2009-10 2 HISTORY About Us Lieutenant John Bowen, of the British Royal By 1808 several settlers were working During this period businesses and some Navy, arrived on Tasmanian soil in 1803 small farms in the district and by 1815 large community services were established, however Sorell Municipality and the passengers from the two boats quantities of wheat were being grown and a it was after the first Municipal Council was Lady Nelson and Albion settled initially at flour mill had been built. The following year proclaimed in 1862 that further progress came. Risdon Cove. Later Bowen sent out several a site for a township was purchased and An electric telegraph service was introduced in exploration parties from the settlement at this was established by 1819.
    [Show full text]
  • Pitt Water – Orielton Lagoon Tasmania Ecological Character
    Pitt WaterWater – Orielton Lagoon Tasmania Ecological Character Description AugustDraft 1 2012August 2009 Pitt Water – Orielton Lagoon Tasmania Ecological Character Description August 2012 Introductory Notes The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) prohibits actions that are likely to have a significant impact on the ecological character of a Ramsar wetland unless the Commonwealth Environment Minister has approved the taking of the action, or some other provision in the EPBC Act allows the action to be taken. The information in this ECD Publication does not indicate any commitment to a particular course of action, policy position or decision. Further, it does not provide assessment of any particular action within the meaning of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth), nor replace the role of the Minister or his delegate in making an informed decision to approve an action. The Water Act 2007 requires that in preparing the [Murray-Darling] Basin Plan, the Murray Darling Basin Authority (MDBA) must take into account Ecological Character Descriptions of declared Ramsar wetlands prepared in accordance with the National Framework. This ECD publication is provided without prejudice to any final decision by the Administrative Authority for Ramsar in Australia on change in ecological character in accordance with the requirements of Article 3.2 of the Ramsar Convention. Disclaimer While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure the contents of this ECD are correct, the Commonwealth of Australia as represented by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities does not guarantee and accepts no legal liability whatsoever arising from or connected to the currency, accuracy, completeness, reliability or suitability of the information in this ECD.
    [Show full text]
  • Edition 2 from Forest to Fjaeldmark the Vegetation Communities Highland Treeless Vegetation
    Edition 2 From Forest to Fjaeldmark The Vegetation Communities Highland treeless vegetation Richea scoparia Edition 2 From Forest to Fjaeldmark 1 Highland treeless vegetation Community (Code) Page Alpine coniferous heathland (HCH) 4 Cushion moorland (HCM) 6 Eastern alpine heathland (HHE) 8 Eastern alpine sedgeland (HSE) 10 Eastern alpine vegetation (undifferentiated) (HUE) 12 Western alpine heathland (HHW) 13 Western alpine sedgeland/herbland (HSW) 15 General description Rainforest and related scrub, Dry eucalypt forest and woodland, Scrub, heathland and coastal complexes. Highland treeless vegetation communities occur Likewise, some non-forest communities with wide within the alpine zone where the growth of trees is environmental amplitudes, such as wetlands, may be impeded by climatic factors. The altitude above found in alpine areas. which trees cannot survive varies between approximately 700 m in the south-west to over The boundaries between alpine vegetation communities are usually well defined, but 1 400 m in the north-east highlands; its exact location depends on a number of factors. In many communities may occur in a tight mosaic. In these parts of Tasmania the boundary is not well defined. situations, mapping community boundaries at Sometimes tree lines are inverted due to exposure 1:25 000 may not be feasible. This is particularly the or frost hollows. problem in the eastern highlands; the class Eastern alpine vegetation (undifferentiated) (HUE) is used in There are seven specific highland heathland, those areas where remote sensing does not provide sedgeland and moorland mapping communities, sufficient resolution. including one undifferentiated class. Other highland treeless vegetation such as grasslands, herbfields, A minor revision in 2017 added information on the grassy sedgelands and wetlands are described in occurrence of peatland pool complexes, and other sections.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Outline
    COUNCIL AGENDA COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ADMINISTRATION CENTRE (CAC) 16 June 2015 Notice is hereby given that the next meeting of the Sorell Council will be held at the Community Administration Centre (CAC), 47 Cole Street, Sorell on Tuesday, 16 June 2015, commencing at 6.00 pm. CERTIFICATION I, Robert Higgins, General Manager of the Sorell Council, hereby certify that in accordance with Section 65 of the Local Government Act 1993, the reports in this Agenda have been prepared by persons who have the qualifications and experience necessary to give such advice. Information and recommendations or such advice was obtained and taken into account in providing general advice contained within the Agenda. Notices of Motion and supporting documentation from Councillors are exempted from this certification. ROBERT HIGGINS GENERAL MANAGER 11 June 2015 AGENDA FOR THE COUNCIL MEETING TO BE HELD AT THE COMMUNITY ADMINISTRATION CENTRE (CAC), 47 COLE STREET, SORELL ON 16 JUNE 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 ATTENDANCE 1 2.0 APOLOGIES 1 3.0 DECLARATIONS OF PECUNIARY INTEREST 1 4.0 CONFIRMATION OF THE MINUTES OF 19 MAY 2015 1 5.0 MAYOR’S REPORT 1 6.0 SUPPLEMENTARY ITEMS 2 7.0 COUNCIL WORKSHOPS REPORT 3 8.0 DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS 3 8.1 GOVERNANCE – ROBERT HIGGINS, GENERAL MANAGER 3 8.2 ENGINEERING & REGULATORY SERVICES – RUSSELL FOX, MANAGER 10 8.3 HR, CUSTOMER & COMMUNITY SERVICES – JESS RADFORD, MANAGER 19 8.4 FINANCE AND INFORMATION – TINA HOUSE, MANAGER 24 9.0 PETITIONS 26 9.1 PETITION – UPGRADE OF FACILITIES, DODGES FERRY SKATE PARK 26 10.0 LAND USE PLANNING 43 10.1 DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT SPECIAL COMMITTEE MINUTES 43 10.2 SECTION 43A – REZONING OF LAND & SPECIFIED DEPARTURE AT 38 GORDON STREET, SORELL AMENDMENT NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Sorell Council Area– Community Food Access Profile
    SORELL COUNCIL AREA– COMMUNITY FOOD ACCESS PROFILE Introduction & disclaimer – This profile has been developed by the Heart Foundation Tasmania as part of the Healthy Food Access Tasmania Project. The information highlighted in this profile was gathered in 2014/15 and it provides an overview for the local government area. For any questions or additional information please contact the Heart Foundation. Why does access to healthy food matter? Limited or poor access to healthy food has both health and social consequences. There are many health conditions and diseases which are associated with or caused by a poor diet, as a result of poor economic or physical access to healthy food. These diseases include heart disease1, diabetes2, some cancers3 and other health conditions such as overweight4 and obesity5. Reduced access to healthy food can cause poor physical development in children and impact their learning and attendance at school6. For adults who have poor access to healthy food it is often very stressful and causes them to be anxious and ashamed7. This often also means they avoid social occasions in their communities and with family and which can lead to them becoming socially isolated8. How are the residents of Sorell doing? Currently 49.9 % of adults living in Sorell eat the recommended two pieces of fruit per day and 7.6 % eat the recommended five serves of vegetables, compared with 42% and 9.8% for state averages9. Sorell residents are eating more fruit and but less vegetables in 2013 when compared with 2009. For adults living in Sorell, 21.5 % are obese9. Compounding this 17.2 % of Sorell adults report that their health is poor or fair, although this is less than the 19% state average10.
    [Show full text]
  • Nowhere Else on Earth
    Nowhere Else on Earth: Tasmania’s Marine Natural Values Environment Tasmania is a not-for-profit conservation council dedicated to the protection, conservation and rehabilitation of Tasmania’s natural environment. Australia’s youngest conservation council, Environment Tasmania was established in 2006 and is a peak body representing over 20 Tasmanian environment groups. Prepared for Environment Tasmania by Dr Karen Parsons of Aquenal Pty Ltd. Report citation: Parsons, K. E. (2011) Nowhere Else on Earth: Tasmania’s Marine Natural Values. Report for Environment Tasmania. Aquenal, Tasmania. ISBN: 978-0-646-56647-4 Graphic Design: onetonnegraphic www.onetonnegraphic.com.au Online: Visit the Environment Tasmania website at: www.et.org.au or Ocean Planet online at www.oceanplanet.org.au Partners: With thanks to the The Wilderness Society Inc for their financial support through the WildCountry Small Grants Program, and to NRM North and NRM South. Front Cover: Gorgonian fan with diver (Photograph: © Geoff Rollins). 2 Waterfall Bay cave (Photograph: © Jon Bryan). Acknowledgements The following people are thanked for their assistance The majority of the photographs in the report were with the compilation of this report: Neville Barrett of the generously provided by Graham Edgar, while the following Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies (IMAS) at the additional contributors are also acknowledged: Neville University of Tasmania for providing information on key Barrett, Jane Elek, Sue Wragge, Chris Black, Jon Bryan, features of Tasmania’s marine
    [Show full text]
  • National Recovery Plan for the Australian Grayling Prototroctes Maraena
    National Recovery Plan for the Australian Grayling Prototroctes maraena Prepared by Gary Backhouse, Justin O’Connor (Department of Sustainability and Environment, Victoria) and Dr Jean Jackson (Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment, Tasmania). Published by the Victorian Government Department of Sustainability and Environment (DSE) Melbourne, 2008. © State of Victoria Department of Sustainability and Environment 2008 This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Authorised by the Victorian Government, 8 Nicholson Street, East Melbourne. ISBN 1 74152 434 2 (html) This is a Recovery Plan prepared under the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, with the assistance of funding provided by the Australian Government. This Recovery Plan has been developed with the involvement and cooperation of a range of stakeholders, but individual stakeholders have not necessarily committed to undertaking specific actions. The attainment of objectives and the provision of funds may be subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved. Proposed actions may be subject to modification over the life of the plan due to changes in knowledge. Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence that may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. An electronic version of this document is available on the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts website www.environment.gov.au For more information contact the DSE Customer Service Centre 136 186 Citation: Backhouse, G., Jackson, J.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Board Review FINAL REPORT: REVIEW of VOLUNTARY AMALGAMATION and SHARED SERVICES OPTIONS
    Local Government Board Review FINAL REPORT: REVIEW OF VOLUNTARY AMALGAMATION AND SHARED SERVICES OPTIONS SORELL AND TASMAN COUNCILS Voluntary Amalgamation and Shared Services Options 1 FINAL REPORT: REVIEW OF VOLUNTARY AMALGAMATION AND SHARED SERVICES OPTIONS: SORELL AND TASMAN COUNCILS Author Local Government Board GPO Box 123 ISBN Hobart, TAS, 7001 978 0 7246 5748 7 Publisher Date Local Government Board August 2018 © Crown in Right of the State of Tasmania July 2018 2 CONTENTS The Local Government Board 5 Abbreviations 6 Definitions 7 Foreword 8 Executive Summary 9 1. Introduction 13 1.1. Background to the Review 13 1.2. Scope of the Review 14 1.3. Process for the Review 17 2. Local Government Reform Context: Amalgamations and Shared Services 19 2.1. Insights from shared services 20 2.2. Insights from previous amalgamation processes and outcomes 22 2.3. Other recent Tasmanian shared services and voluntary amalgamation studies 24 3. Key Features of the Sorell and Tasman Municipal Areas 26 3.1. Introduction 26 3.2. Demography 27 3.3. Economy 30 3.4. Social 32 4. Key Features of the Sorell and Tasman Councils 34 4.1. Introduction 34 4.2. Current financial viability/performance 35 4.3. Councillors and staff 37 4.4. Current Shared Services Arrangements between Sorell and Tasman Councils 38 4.5. Role of Shared General Manager of Sorell and Tasman Councils 40 3 5. Stand-Alone Councils (Option 1 – No change) 41 5.1. Introduction 41 5.2. Financial Sustainability as Stand-Alone Councils: (10-20 year outlook) 42 5.3. Effective local representation 55 5.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Council Email Address Web Site Mayor General Manager
    COUNCIL EMAIL ADDRESS WEB SITE MAYOR GENERAL MANAGER Break O'Day Council [email protected] http://www.bodc.tas.gov.au Mayor Mick Tucker Mr John Brown Brighton Council [email protected] http://www.brighton.tas.gov.au Mayor Tony Foster Mr James Dryburgh Burnie City Council [email protected] http://www.burnie.net Mayor Steve Kons Mr Andrew Wardlaw Central Coast Council [email protected] http://www.centcoast.tas.gov.au Mayor Jan Bonde Ms Sandra Ayton Central Highlands Council [email protected] http://www.centralhighlands.tas.gov.au Mayor Loueen Triffitt Ms Lyn Eyles Circular Head Council [email protected] http://www.circularhead.tas.gov.au Mayor Daryl Quilliam Mr Scott Riley Clarence, City Of [email protected] http://www.ccc.tas.gov.au Mayor Doug Chipman Mr Ian Nelson Derwent Valley Council [email protected] http://www.derwentvalley.tas.gov.au Mayor Ben Shaw Mr Dean Griggs Devonport City Council [email protected] http://www.devonport.tas.gov.au Mayor Annette Rockliff Mr Matthew Atkins Dorset Council [email protected] http://www.dorset.tas.gov.au Mayor Greg Howard Mr Tim Watson Flinders Council [email protected] http://www.flinders.tas.gov.au Mayor Annie Revie Mr Warren Groves George Town Council [email protected] http://www.georgetown.tas.gov.au Mayor Greg Kieser Mr Shane Power Glamorgan Spring Bay Council [email protected] http://www.gsbc.tas.gov.au Mayor Jenny Woods (A/g) Ms Marissa Walters (A/g) Glenorchy City Council
    [Show full text]
  • Community Services Directory 2021
    COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTORY Community. Coast. Country. Community Services Directory INDEX ANIMALS 5 ARTS AND CULTURE 6 CHURCHES AND RELATED ACTIVITIES 7 COMMUNITY HALLS 8 COMMUNITY GROUPS 9 COMMUNITY PROGRAMS & SERVICES 10 COMMISSIONER OF DECLARATIONS 11 COUNCIL INFORMATION 12 EDUCATION AND CHILD CARE 13 EMERGENCY SERVICES 14 GOVERNMENT SERVICES 15 HEALTH SERVICES 16 HELPLINES 18 JUSTICES OF THE PEACE 19 PUBLIC TOILETS 20 SENIORS 21 SOCIAL GROUPS 24 SPORT AND RECREATION 25 TOURIST INFORMATION 27 TRANSPORT 28 2 Community Services Directory ABOUT THE DIRECTORY One of the great qualities of the Sorell Municipality is the involvement of its residents in a wide variety of community services and activities. These activities are primarily volunteer based and this Directory reflects the giving nature of our community. The Community Services Directory is designed to assist residents, service providers and community organisations within the Sorell Municipality to find out about what's going on in their local community. It lists information and contact details for local services, activities and events. Every effort has been made to ensure all information is correct at the time of printing. If you are aware of omissions or errors, or you would like to be included in the Directory, please call us on 6269 0000 or email [email protected]. 3 Community Services Directory ABOUT SORELL Established in 1862, the Sorell Municipality is one of Tasmania’s oldest. Located 25 kilometres from Hobart in the south-east of Tasmania, the Municipality covers 583 square kilometres of rolling countryside, low forested hills and the coastline of the spectacular Southern Beaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Woodland Birds for Biodiversity
    Woodland Birds for Biodiversity: Prioritising landscapes for conservation on private land A method developed by Birds Australia, Nature Conservation Trust of NSW, Trust for Nature and Tasmanian Land Conservancy March 2010 Birds Australia Birds Australia (Royal Australasian Ornithologists Union) was founded in 1901 and works to conserve native birds and biological diversity in Australasia and Antarctica, through the study and management of birds and their habitats, and the education and involvement of the community. Birds Australia produces a range of publications, including Emu, a quarterly scientific journal; Wingspan, a quarterly magazine for all members; Conservation Statements; Birds Australia Monographs; the Birds Australia Report series; and the Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic Birds. It also maintains a comprehensive ornithological library and several scientific databases covering bird distribution and biology. Membership of Birds Australia is open to anyone interested in birds and their habitats, and concerned about the future of our avifauna. For further information about membership, subscriptions and database access, contact: Birds Australia, Suite2-05, 60 Leicester St, Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia E-mail: [email protected] ABN 87 004 076 475 Internet www.birdsaustralia.com.au Recommended citation Ingwersen, D., Tzaros, C., Robinson, D., Bryant, S. and Jones, N. 2010. Woodland Birds for Biodiversity: Prioritising landscapes for conservation on private land. Unpublished Report to the Australian Government from Birds Australia, Melbourne. This report was prepared by Birds Australia, Trust for Nature, Nature Conservation Trust of New South Wales and Tasmanian Land Conservancy as part of the Woodland Birds for Biodiversity project, through funding from the Australian Government’s Caring for our Country.
    [Show full text]
  • East Coast of Tasmania
    FREE PUBLICATION ‘Serving Your Community from Buckland to Bicheno’ NOVEMBER 2020 EastThe Coast ABALONE QUOTA CUT Page 2 WithVIEW The Sorell Times and Tasman Gazette we distribute 10,000 copies throughout the South East and East Coast of Tasmania. NEWS ~ SPORT ~ FOOD ~ ARTS ~ COMMUNITY Festival framework MARTINE HALEY weekend was a great success, hun- dreds of people attended from all EAST Coast Tourism has welcomed around the state. the recently released framework for “It was held outdoors with social festivals, live concerts and other distancing still in force. That was a public events, hoping it will see the step in the right direction’’ return of popular events in a COVID East Coast Tourism CEO Rhon- safe way. da Taylor said the framework was a The ever-popular Bicheno Food positive step forward. and Wine Festival usually held this “The intention is to provide clarity month had to be cancelled due to the and guidance to event organisers. uncertainty around safety. “East Coast Tasmania Tourism Similarly, Falls Festival at Mari- was provided the opportunity to on Bay and the Bream Creek Show contribute to feedback on the draft have each cancelled with hopes only framework, which is a great collab- the Koonya Garlic Festival will still oration,’’ Ms Taylor said. take place in February. “The greatest challenge for event Glamorgan-Spring Bay Mayor organisers is the risk associated with Robert Young said the relaxation a potential cancellation/modification of border controls and the proposed of an event. framework bode well for local tour- “This may occur due to a shift in ism.
    [Show full text]