Pitt Water – Orielton Lagoon Tasmania Ecological Character

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pitt Water – Orielton Lagoon Tasmania Ecological Character Pitt WaterWater – Orielton Lagoon Tasmania Ecological Character Description AugustDraft 1 2012August 2009 Pitt Water – Orielton Lagoon Tasmania Ecological Character Description August 2012 Introductory Notes The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) prohibits actions that are likely to have a significant impact on the ecological character of a Ramsar wetland unless the Commonwealth Environment Minister has approved the taking of the action, or some other provision in the EPBC Act allows the action to be taken. The information in this ECD Publication does not indicate any commitment to a particular course of action, policy position or decision. Further, it does not provide assessment of any particular action within the meaning of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth), nor replace the role of the Minister or his delegate in making an informed decision to approve an action. The Water Act 2007 requires that in preparing the [Murray-Darling] Basin Plan, the Murray Darling Basin Authority (MDBA) must take into account Ecological Character Descriptions of declared Ramsar wetlands prepared in accordance with the National Framework. This ECD publication is provided without prejudice to any final decision by the Administrative Authority for Ramsar in Australia on change in ecological character in accordance with the requirements of Article 3.2 of the Ramsar Convention. Disclaimer While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure the contents of this ECD are correct, the Commonwealth of Australia as represented by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities does not guarantee and accepts no legal liability whatsoever arising from or connected to the currency, accuracy, completeness, reliability or suitability of the information in this ECD. Note: There may be differences in the type of information contained in this ECD publication, to those of other Ramsar wetlands. ii Executive Summary This Ecological Character Description (ECD) has been prepared in accordance with the National Framework and Guidance for Describing the Ecological Character of Australia’s Ramsar wetlands (DEWHA 2008). The purpose of the ECD is to provide an integrated description of the critical components, processes and ecosystem services for this Ramsar site. It also outlines threats to the ecological character of the site, information gaps and limits of acceptable change. A recommended monitoring program identifies key measurable indicators of change. The ECD draws on available information and knowledge of estuarine ecosystem function, including evidence of some trends at the site since the time of listing in 1982 to 2009. The Pitt Water - Orielton Lagoon Ramsar site (PWOL) is located in the south east of Tasmania, close to Tasmania’s state capital, Hobart, and surrounded by agricultural land and small towns, now within the commuter belt of the capital. The surrounding lands were cleared for agriculture from the time of early settlement in the 1800s and PWOL lies in the path of major transportation routes used since colonial times. These factors have had an effect on PWOL, thereby altering the natural processes of the system for decades. In addition to changes to river flows and sediment transport, two causeways were constructed in 1874 across the upper parts of the estuary. Thus at the time of listing, the site was already a modified system. PWOL lies in the driest area of Tasmania and has variable annual rainfall: therefore it is especially prone to the effects of loss of river flows. The site boundary crosses the main central basin of the estuary, thereby excluding some estuary features and habitats. The upper areas of the estuary are defined by the presence of the two causeways. The large area, known as Upper Pitt Water, reaches upstream as far as the town of Richmond at the mouth of the Coal River. It marks the upper tidal limit, now barred with a weir. Tides move freely through an extensive bridge in the western causeway. The second distinctive area of PWOL is Orielton Lagoon, formed by iii the second (eastern) causeway. Once a wide, open bay of a secondary estuary feature, at the time of listing Orielton Lagoon (as it became known) was virtually cut off with only two narrow culverts with sills set at high tide level linking it to the main body of water. As a consequence, the lagoon was almost certainly eutrophic and the extensive saltmarsh at the head of the lagoon was in very poor condition. Nevertheless, Orielton Lagoon was important for bird life. Some other locations within the PWOL boundary but below the causeways also provided small alternative feeding and roosting for birds. These are at Iron Creek and the mouth of the Sorell Rivulet. When PWOL was Ramsar listed in 1982, it was considered to meet four criteria: 2 a, 2b, 2d, and 3. Since 1982 the Ramsar criteria have been modified and extended, and the standards applied by DSEWPaC (or its former equivalent agencies) have been clarified. Biodiversity criteria for which the site was originally listed are still supported at the site, albeit with some loss in species diversity and abundance. The condition of the site may be considered to be generally poorer, with the exception of the waters of Orielton Lagoon which has benefited from improved tidal exchange and removal of sewage outfalls. The status of key environmental components and processes within PWOL and the wider estuarine functions that support the system is now considered modified, so the site no longer justifies inclusion under Criterion 1 as a rare or representative wetland in ‘natural or near-natural condition’. PWOL meets five criteria for Ramsar listing as follows: Group B of the Criteria. Sites of international importance for conserving biological diversity Criteria based on species and ecological communities Criterion 2: A wetland should be considered internationally important if it supports vulnerable, endangered, or critically endangered species or threatened ecological communities. Criterion 3: A wetland should be considered internationally important if it supports populations of plant and/or animal species important for maintaining the biological diversity of a particular biogeographic region. Criterion 4: A wetland should be considered internationally important if it supports plant and/or animal species at a critical stage in their life cycles, or provides refuge during adverse conditions. Specific criteria based on fish Criterion 8: A wetland should be considered internationally important if it is an important source of food for fishes, spawning ground, nursery and/or migration path on which fish stocks, either within the wetland or elsewhere, depend. Specific criteria based on other taxa iv Criterion 9: A wetland should be considered internationally important if it regularly supports 1% of the individuals in a population of one species or subspecies of wetland-dependent non-avian animal species. The PWOL system supports important biodiversity values, including saltmarshes hosting different facies of vegetation communities and species with several saltmarsh, wetland and coastal plant and invertebrate species considered rare in Tasmania. The birdlife of PWOL includes migratory and resident waterbirds, including shorebirds, and seabirds. Orielton Lagoon is the most important site for migratory shorebirds in the Bruny Marine Bioregion. It is the most southerly area used by waders of the East Asian - Australasian Flyway. PWOL supports the biodiversity of the South-East Bioregion and Bruny Marine Bioregion. It is also important as the most significant shark breeding area in southern Tasmania and the habitat it provides for a rare endemic seastar and rare bird species. Details of how PWOL meets the five criteria are provided in Section 2. Figure ES1. summarises the components, processes and services of the site. Physical components and Supporting biological processes components •Climate •Phytoplankton •Landscape context, geomorphology •Zooplankton •Water quality /salinity •Invertebrates •Sediments •Tidal regime •River flows Communities and Habitats species •Estuarine water •Saltmarsh communities and species •Intertidal flats •Waterbirds •Saltmarsh •Seastar •Seagrass beds •Fish •Rocky shorelines Ecosystem benefits and services •Provisioning: Contributes and supports wetland products •Regulating: Maintains a complex and diverse estuarine ecosystem important for a range of biotic communities and species, including supporting critical biological processes and interactions •Cultural: Offers a range of community benefits for recreation, tourism, inspiration, education and community identity and affiliation •Supporting: Provides benefits through regulating and processing sediments, nutrients and waste, and maintaining water quality through tidal exchange v Figure ES1: Summary framework of components, processes and ecosystem services at PWOL. Section 3 provides details of critical components and processes for the site, summarised in Table ES1. The critical components and processes were selected using the criteria set out in the guidelines. Table ES1: Critical components and processes in PWOL showing commonalities and differences between the two main areas within the site. Component Sub-component Features and Features and processes processes Upper Pitt Water Orielton Lagoon Climate Rainfall Low and variable Cool temperate climate Exposed to NW and SW winds Wave-dominated estuary Hydrology Estuary type Shallow estuary with Shallow water body
Recommended publications
  • Ramsar Sites in Order of Addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance
    Ramsar sites in order of addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance RS# Country Site Name Desig’n Date 1 Australia Cobourg Peninsula 8-May-74 2 Finland Aspskär 28-May-74 3 Finland Söderskär and Långören 28-May-74 4 Finland Björkör and Lågskär 28-May-74 5 Finland Signilskär 28-May-74 6 Finland Valassaaret and Björkögrunden 28-May-74 7 Finland Krunnit 28-May-74 8 Finland Ruskis 28-May-74 9 Finland Viikki 28-May-74 10 Finland Suomujärvi - Patvinsuo 28-May-74 11 Finland Martimoaapa - Lumiaapa 28-May-74 12 Finland Koitilaiskaira 28-May-74 13 Norway Åkersvika 9-Jul-74 14 Sweden Falsterbo - Foteviken 5-Dec-74 15 Sweden Klingavälsån - Krankesjön 5-Dec-74 16 Sweden Helgeån 5-Dec-74 17 Sweden Ottenby 5-Dec-74 18 Sweden Öland, eastern coastal areas 5-Dec-74 19 Sweden Getterön 5-Dec-74 20 Sweden Store Mosse and Kävsjön 5-Dec-74 21 Sweden Gotland, east coast 5-Dec-74 22 Sweden Hornborgasjön 5-Dec-74 23 Sweden Tåkern 5-Dec-74 24 Sweden Kvismaren 5-Dec-74 25 Sweden Hjälstaviken 5-Dec-74 26 Sweden Ånnsjön 5-Dec-74 27 Sweden Gammelstadsviken 5-Dec-74 28 Sweden Persöfjärden 5-Dec-74 29 Sweden Tärnasjön 5-Dec-74 30 Sweden Tjålmejaure - Laisdalen 5-Dec-74 31 Sweden Laidaure 5-Dec-74 32 Sweden Sjaunja 5-Dec-74 33 Sweden Tavvavuoma 5-Dec-74 34 South Africa De Hoop Vlei 12-Mar-75 35 South Africa Barberspan 12-Mar-75 36 Iran, I. R.
    [Show full text]
  • Hudsonian Godwit (Limosa Haemastica) at Orielton Lagoon, Tasmania, 09/03/2018
    Hudsonian Godwit (Limosa haemastica) at Orielton Lagoon, Tasmania, 09/03/2018 Peter Vaughan and Andrea Magnusson E: T: Introduction: This submission pertains to the observation and identification of a single Hudsonian Godwit (Limosa haemastica) at Orielton Lagoon, Tasmania, on the afternoon of the 9th of March 2018. The bird was observed in the company of 50 Bar-tailed Godwits (Limosa lapponica) and a single Black-tailed Godwit (Limosa limosa), and both comparative and diagnostic features were used to differentiate it from these species. Owing to the recognised difficulties in differentiating similar species of wading birds, this submission makes a detailed analysis of the features used to identify the godwit in question. If accepted, this sighting would represent the eighth confirmed record of this species in Australia, and the second record of this species in Tasmania. Sighting and Circumstances: The godwit in question was observed on the western side of Orielton Lagoon in Tasmania, at approximately 543440 E 5262330 N, GDA 94, 55G. This location is comprised of open tidal mudflats abutted by Sarcicornia sp. saltmarsh, and is a well- documented roosting and feeding site for Bar-tailed Godwits and several other species of wading bird. This has included, for the past three migration seasons, a single Black-tailed Godwit (extralimital at this location) associating with the Bar-tailed Godwit flock. The Hudsonian Godwit was observed for approximately 37 minutes, between approximately 16:12 and 16:49, although the mixed flock of Bar-tailed Godwits and Black-tailed Godwits was observed for 55 minutes prior to this time. The weather during observation was clear skies (1/8 cloud cover), with a light north- easterly breeze and relatively warm temperatures (wind speed nor exact temperature recorded).
    [Show full text]
  • Edition 2 from Forest to Fjaeldmark the Vegetation Communities Highland Treeless Vegetation
    Edition 2 From Forest to Fjaeldmark The Vegetation Communities Highland treeless vegetation Richea scoparia Edition 2 From Forest to Fjaeldmark 1 Highland treeless vegetation Community (Code) Page Alpine coniferous heathland (HCH) 4 Cushion moorland (HCM) 6 Eastern alpine heathland (HHE) 8 Eastern alpine sedgeland (HSE) 10 Eastern alpine vegetation (undifferentiated) (HUE) 12 Western alpine heathland (HHW) 13 Western alpine sedgeland/herbland (HSW) 15 General description Rainforest and related scrub, Dry eucalypt forest and woodland, Scrub, heathland and coastal complexes. Highland treeless vegetation communities occur Likewise, some non-forest communities with wide within the alpine zone where the growth of trees is environmental amplitudes, such as wetlands, may be impeded by climatic factors. The altitude above found in alpine areas. which trees cannot survive varies between approximately 700 m in the south-west to over The boundaries between alpine vegetation communities are usually well defined, but 1 400 m in the north-east highlands; its exact location depends on a number of factors. In many communities may occur in a tight mosaic. In these parts of Tasmania the boundary is not well defined. situations, mapping community boundaries at Sometimes tree lines are inverted due to exposure 1:25 000 may not be feasible. This is particularly the or frost hollows. problem in the eastern highlands; the class Eastern alpine vegetation (undifferentiated) (HUE) is used in There are seven specific highland heathland, those areas where remote sensing does not provide sedgeland and moorland mapping communities, sufficient resolution. including one undifferentiated class. Other highland treeless vegetation such as grasslands, herbfields, A minor revision in 2017 added information on the grassy sedgelands and wetlands are described in occurrence of peatland pool complexes, and other sections.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia's National Heritage
    AUSTRALIA’S australia’s national heritage © Commonwealth of Australia, 2010 Published by the Australian Government Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts ISBN: 978-1-921733-02-4 Information in this document may be copied for personal use or published for educational purposes, provided that any extracts are fully acknowledged. Heritage Division Australian Government Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts GPO Box 787 Canberra ACT 2601 Australia Email [email protected] Phone 1800 803 772 Images used throughout are © Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts and associated photographers unless otherwise noted. Front cover images courtesy: Botanic Gardens Trust, Joe Shemesh, Brickendon Estate, Stuart Cohen, iStockphoto Back cover: AGAD, GBRMPA, iStockphoto “Our heritage provides an enduring golden thread that binds our diverse past with our life today and the stories of tomorrow.” Anonymous Willandra Lakes Region II AUSTRALIA’S NATIONAL HERITAGE A message from the Minister Welcome to the second edition of Australia’s National Heritage celebrating the 87 special places on Australia’s National Heritage List. Australia’s heritage places are a source of great national pride. Each and every site tells a unique Australian story. These places and stories have laid the foundations of our shared national identity upon which our communities are built. The treasured places and their stories featured throughout this book represent Australia’s remarkably diverse natural environment. Places such as the Glass House Mountains and the picturesque Australian Alps. Other places celebrate Australia’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander culture—the world’s oldest continuous culture on earth—through places such as the Brewarrina Fish Traps and Mount William Stone Hatchet Quarry.
    [Show full text]
  • Nowhere Else on Earth
    Nowhere Else on Earth: Tasmania’s Marine Natural Values Environment Tasmania is a not-for-profit conservation council dedicated to the protection, conservation and rehabilitation of Tasmania’s natural environment. Australia’s youngest conservation council, Environment Tasmania was established in 2006 and is a peak body representing over 20 Tasmanian environment groups. Prepared for Environment Tasmania by Dr Karen Parsons of Aquenal Pty Ltd. Report citation: Parsons, K. E. (2011) Nowhere Else on Earth: Tasmania’s Marine Natural Values. Report for Environment Tasmania. Aquenal, Tasmania. ISBN: 978-0-646-56647-4 Graphic Design: onetonnegraphic www.onetonnegraphic.com.au Online: Visit the Environment Tasmania website at: www.et.org.au or Ocean Planet online at www.oceanplanet.org.au Partners: With thanks to the The Wilderness Society Inc for their financial support through the WildCountry Small Grants Program, and to NRM North and NRM South. Front Cover: Gorgonian fan with diver (Photograph: © Geoff Rollins). 2 Waterfall Bay cave (Photograph: © Jon Bryan). Acknowledgements The following people are thanked for their assistance The majority of the photographs in the report were with the compilation of this report: Neville Barrett of the generously provided by Graham Edgar, while the following Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies (IMAS) at the additional contributors are also acknowledged: Neville University of Tasmania for providing information on key Barrett, Jane Elek, Sue Wragge, Chris Black, Jon Bryan, features of Tasmania’s marine
    [Show full text]
  • National Recovery Plan for the Australian Grayling Prototroctes Maraena
    National Recovery Plan for the Australian Grayling Prototroctes maraena Prepared by Gary Backhouse, Justin O’Connor (Department of Sustainability and Environment, Victoria) and Dr Jean Jackson (Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment, Tasmania). Published by the Victorian Government Department of Sustainability and Environment (DSE) Melbourne, 2008. © State of Victoria Department of Sustainability and Environment 2008 This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Authorised by the Victorian Government, 8 Nicholson Street, East Melbourne. ISBN 1 74152 434 2 (html) This is a Recovery Plan prepared under the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, with the assistance of funding provided by the Australian Government. This Recovery Plan has been developed with the involvement and cooperation of a range of stakeholders, but individual stakeholders have not necessarily committed to undertaking specific actions. The attainment of objectives and the provision of funds may be subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved. Proposed actions may be subject to modification over the life of the plan due to changes in knowledge. Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence that may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. An electronic version of this document is available on the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts website www.environment.gov.au For more information contact the DSE Customer Service Centre 136 186 Citation: Backhouse, G., Jackson, J.
    [Show full text]
  • Infrastructure Project Pipeline 2020-21
    February 2021 Tasmania’s 10 Year Infrastructure Pipeline Infrastructure Tasmania i Contents Contents ............................................................................................................................................................. i Minister’s message ............................................................................................................................................ ii 1. About the Pipeline ......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 What is included in the Pipeline? ................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose of the Pipeline .................................................................................................................................. 2 2. Infrastructure in the context of COVID-19 ....................................................................................................... 3 3. Analysis of Pipeline trends ............................................................................................................................. 5 3.1 Timing of spend by asset class ........................................................................................................................ 5 3.2 Project driver analysis ..................................................................................................................................... 6 3.3 Infrastructure class analysis
    [Show full text]
  • Woodland Birds for Biodiversity
    Woodland Birds for Biodiversity: Prioritising landscapes for conservation on private land A method developed by Birds Australia, Nature Conservation Trust of NSW, Trust for Nature and Tasmanian Land Conservancy March 2010 Birds Australia Birds Australia (Royal Australasian Ornithologists Union) was founded in 1901 and works to conserve native birds and biological diversity in Australasia and Antarctica, through the study and management of birds and their habitats, and the education and involvement of the community. Birds Australia produces a range of publications, including Emu, a quarterly scientific journal; Wingspan, a quarterly magazine for all members; Conservation Statements; Birds Australia Monographs; the Birds Australia Report series; and the Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic Birds. It also maintains a comprehensive ornithological library and several scientific databases covering bird distribution and biology. Membership of Birds Australia is open to anyone interested in birds and their habitats, and concerned about the future of our avifauna. For further information about membership, subscriptions and database access, contact: Birds Australia, Suite2-05, 60 Leicester St, Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia E-mail: [email protected] ABN 87 004 076 475 Internet www.birdsaustralia.com.au Recommended citation Ingwersen, D., Tzaros, C., Robinson, D., Bryant, S. and Jones, N. 2010. Woodland Birds for Biodiversity: Prioritising landscapes for conservation on private land. Unpublished Report to the Australian Government from Birds Australia, Melbourne. This report was prepared by Birds Australia, Trust for Nature, Nature Conservation Trust of New South Wales and Tasmanian Land Conservancy as part of the Woodland Birds for Biodiversity project, through funding from the Australian Government’s Caring for our Country.
    [Show full text]
  • CERCA Baseline Report Final
    FINAL REPORT TO NHT COASTAL & ESTUARINE RESOURCE CONDITION ASSESSMENT A BASELINE SURVEY IN THE SOUTHERN NRM REGION, TASMANIA Nepelle Temby and Christine Crawford June 2008 Coastal and Estuarine Resource Condition Assessment: A baseline survey in the Southern NRM Region, Tasmania Disclaimer The content of this report has been based on existing information that will be subject to change as new information becomes available. Every effort has been made to ensure that the information contained in this strategy is accurate. Further information is available from the references listed. The opinions expressed in this report are those of the author/s and are not necessarily those of the Tasmanian Aquaculture and Fisheries Institute. ©Tasmanian Aquaculture and Fisheries Institute, University of Tasmania 2008. Marine Research Laboratories – Tasmanian Aquaculture and Fisheries Institute, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 49, Hobart, Tasmania, 7001. Email: [email protected] Ph: (03) 6227 7224 Fax: (03) 6227 8035 Contents SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................................................................1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................................................2 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .........................................................................................................................3 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • General Introduction
    Modern and Recent Seafloor Environments (Sedimentary, Foraminiferal and Ostracode) of the Pitt Water Estuary, South-east Tasmania VOLUME 1 Dale Lewis A thesis submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy May, 2006 School of Earth Sciences University of Tasmania Hobart DECLARATION This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for a degree or diploma by the university or any other institution, and to the best of the author’s knowledge and belief no material previously published or written by another person except where due reference is made in the text. ………………….. Dale Lewis May 2006 AUTHORITY OF ACCESS This thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying in accordance with the Copyright Act of 1968. ………………….. Dale Lewis May 2006 ii ABSTRACT The Pitt Water Estuary is a shallow, barrier estuary, with typically normal marine salinity, which has been subject to considerable anthropogenic modification. Modern seafloor environments were described using the distribution of sedimentary facies and foraminiferal and ostracod assemblages, examined from surficial sediment samples. Ten sedimentary facies were identified by grouping sediment samples using particle-size distribution data and lithic sand content. Faunal assemblages were identified by cluster analysis, with twelve sample, and eight species associations defined by foraminifera, and eight sample, and six species associations defined by Ostracoda. The distribution of sedimentary facies varies, firstly, with the upstream change in relative current energy (tidal versus fluvial) as reflected by the relative proportion of quartzose to lithic sand in sediment; and, secondly, with the water depth variation in current strength, as reflected by the sand grain size and mud content.
    [Show full text]
  • King Island News for 8 Days Over Easter This Year
    YELLOW THROAT The newsletter of BirdLife Tasmania a branch of BirdLife Australia Number 69, May 2013 Bob Brown at General Meeting Greg Irons to speak in July Life Sciences Building, University of Greg became the director of the Bonorong Wildlife Tasmania, Thursday, 9 May, 8.00 p.m. Sanctuary at just 25 years of age, and has so far enlisted more than 800 volunteers. The rescue service runs 24 Dr Bob Brown, founder and former leader of the Greens hours a day, seven days a week, and in the last 12 months Party, former senator for Tasmania, and current director of has taken over 5000 calls. As a private sanctuary that cares the Australian chapter of Sea Shepherd, will be the speaker for orphaned and injured wildlife, Bonorong depends on at the May General Meeting. Dr Brown will be speaking donations and visitor entries. about the impact that birds have had in his life. Greg is also a familiar face in the children’s ward of the Royal Hobart Hospital, visiting with baby wombats and Meeting venue: Life Sciences Lecture Theatre 1, Life blue-tongue lizards to brighten sick children’s days and Sciences Building, University of Tasmania, Sandy Bay. help spread his conservation message. Greg’s deep under- Access and parking are from College Road or from the standing of Tasmania’s wildlife, and his passion for parking area outside the University Centre via the conservation values, is helping preserve the state’s pedestrian bridge over Churchill Avenue. precious environment. Bonorong Wildlife Sanctuary BYO Barbecue for BirdLife Tasmania, 18 May Bonorong Wildlife Sanctuary is hosting a BYO barbecue for BirdLife Tasmania members on Saturday 18 May at 5.00 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vegetation Communities Dry Eucalypt Forest and Woodland
    Edition 2 From Forest to Fjaeldmark The Vegetation Communities Dry eucalypt forest and woodland Eucalyptus amygdalina Edition 2 From Forest to Fjaeldmark 1 Dry eucalypt forest and woodland Community (Code) Page Eucalyptus amygdalina coastal forest and woodland (DAC) 11 Eucalyptus amygdalina forest and woodland on dolerite (DAD) 13 Eucalyptus amygdalina forest and woodland on sandstone (DAS) 15 Eucalyptus amygdalina forest on mudstone (DAM) 17 Eucalyptus amygdalina inland forest and woodland on Cainozoic deposits (DAZ) 19 Eucalyptus amygdalina–Eucalyptus obliqua damp sclerophyll forest (DSC) 22 Eucalyptus barberi forest and woodland (DBA) 24 Eucalyptus coccifera forest and woodland (DCO) 25 Eucalyptus cordata forest (DCR) 27 Eucalyptus dalrympleana–Eucalyptus pauciflora forest and woodland (DDP) 29 Eucalyptus delegatensis dry forest and woodland (DDE) 31 Eucalyptus globulus dry forest and woodland (DGL) 33 Eucalyptus gunnii woodland (DGW) 35 Eucalyptus morrisbyi forest and woodland (DMO) 37 Eucalyptus nitida dry forest and woodland (DNI) 39 Eucalyptus nitida Furneaux forest (DNF) 41 Eucalyptus obliqua dry forest (DOB) 43 Eucalyptus ovata forest and woodland (DOV) 45 Eucalyptus ovata heathy woodland (DOW) 48 Eucalyptus pauciflora forest and woodland not on dolerite (DPO) 50 Eucalyptus pauciflora forest and woodland on dolerite (DPD) 52 Eucalyptus perriniana forest and woodland (DPE) 54 Eucalyptus pulchella forest and woodland (DPU) 56 Eucalyptus risdonii forest and woodland (DRI) 58 Eucalyptus rodwayi forest and woodland (DRO) 60 Eucalyptus
    [Show full text]