State of california - The Resources Agency Primary# ______DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # ______PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial------NRHP Status Code 6Z Other Listings ______Review Code Reviewer Date. ___ *Paae 1 of 31 *Resource Name or#: 1702 Camino Del Rio North. San Diego. CA 92108 *Pl. Other Identifier: Macv's *P2: Location: Not for publication Unrestricted X a. County: San Diego And (P2b and P2c or P2d. Attach a location map as necessary.) *b. USGS Quad La Jolla Date: 1996 T; R; ~of~ of Sec. B.M. ____ c. Address: 1702 Camino Del Rio North City: San Diego Zip: 92108 d. UTM: (Give more than one large or linear resources) Zone: Me/ mN e. Other Locational Data (e.g. parcel#, directions to resource, elevation, etc. as appropriate); APN: #438...030-06, Lot 4, Map 4?44 *P3a. Description (Describe resource and its major elements, include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting and boundaries.)
The building is a three-story with basement and penthouse, asymmetrical, irregular shaped, Modern Contemporary style, department store at the east end of the Mission Valley Shopping Center., The building has undergone a variety of alterations and changes to the exterior facades. Each fa~ade of the structure contains different eleme.nts but also repeats many of the predominant design elements. The building has a flat roof with support systems and a mechanical penthouse. The building was constructed of reinforced concrete with a pre-cast stone and pre~cast concrete exterior. See Continuation Sheets for further description. *P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP 7:3 Storv Commercial Bldg. P4. Resources Present: Building X Structure Object Site District Element of District Other PSb. Description of Photo: (View, date Accessions#) View: SW/June 2013 *P6. Date Constructed/Age and Source Historic X Prehistoric Both c. 1959/Assessor's Building Records *P7. Owner and Address: Mission Valley Shopping Town LLC. Macv's California Inc.. 7 West i 11 Street. Cincinnati OH 45202 *PS: Recorded by: (Name, Affiliation, Address) K. A. Crawford/Office of Marie Burke Ua. 427 C Street. #416. San Diego, CA 92101 & Scott A. Moomlian 5173 Waring Road. San Diego CA 92120 *P9. Date Recorded: 12/2015
*PlO. Type of Survey: Intensive *Pll: Report Citation (Cite Survey Report and other sources: None *Attachments: location Map Sketch Map Continuation Sheet X Building, Structure and Object Record X Archaeological Record District Record Linier Resource Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photograph Record Other (List):
State of California -The Resources Agency Primary# _ ____ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# ______BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD *NRHP Status Code 6Z
*Page 2 of 31 *Resource Name 1702 Camino Del Rio North, San Diego, CA 92108 Bl. Historic Name: May Company 82: Common Name: Macy's 83. Original Use: Commercial/Department Store 84: Present Use: Commercial/Department St ore *BS: Architectural Style: Modern Contemporary *B6: Construction History: (Construction Date, alterations and dates of alterations) This building was constructed in 1959. Alterations were made to all four facades in subsequent years. B7. Moved?_! No Yes Unknown Date: Original Location ______*BS. Related Features: Mission Valley Shopping Center B9a. Architect: WilliamS. Lewis, Jr b. Builder: Albert C. Martin & Associates of Los Angeles CA *B10. Significance: Development of Mission Valley. Modern Contemporary Architecture. and Master Architect Area: Mission Valley Period of Significance: 1959-Present Property Type: Commercial Applicable Criteria: A. C & D (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.)
This department store was built during the post-World War II years of the commercial development of Mission Valley in the 1950s and, at that time, it would have been considered eligible as a special element of the City's economic development under Criterion A: Community Development. However, its subsequent alterations have deprived it of its original physical integrity. The building is not considered to be significant under Criterion B: Person or Event as no persons or events of note were associated with the property. Due to its many alterations, the building does not now include a sufficient amount of the character defining features of the Modern Contemporary style and the property is not considered to be architecturally significant under Criterion C: Architecture. The building would have met Criterion D: Master Architect as a notable work designed by Master Architect William S. Lewis, Jr., but its various alterations have reduced the building's integrity to below a level of significance. See the Continuation Sheets for further significance discussion.
B~l. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) None *812. References: City of San Diego Building Department Records; County of San Diego Assessor's Records: City of San Diego Water and Sewer Records. San Diego Modernism Context Statement: Modern San Diego Dot Cam., etc. B13. Remarks: None *B14: Evaluators: K.A. Crawford *Date of Evaluation: 12/2015
(This space reserved for official comments.)
State of California- The Resource Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION CONTINUATION SHEET Primary# ______HRI#,______Trinomial ______Page 3 of 31 *Resource Name or# (Assigned by recorder) 1702 Camino Del Rio North. San Diego CA 92108 *Recorded by K.A. Crawford/Office of Marie Burke lia Date 12/2015 Continuation X Update
P3a. Building Description
The subject property is a 383,000 square foot, one- to-three-story building with a basement and penthouse structure. The building is an irregular shaped, asymmetrical, Modern Contemporary style, department store located on a multiple acre shopping center property in Mission Valley, immediately adjacent to Interstate Highway 8. The building is sited at the east end ofthe shopping complex and served as one of the original anchor stores of the complex.
As discussed in more detail below, each fat;ade of the structure contains different elements but also repeats many of the predominant design elements. The building has a flat roof with support systems and a mechanical penthouse. The building was constructed of reinforced concrete with a pre-cast stone and pre-cast concrete exterior. The dominant features ofthe exterior fac.:jdes are large panels of pre-cast concrete that have been placed at the second and third floor levels. The design of the panels consists of continuous rows of hexagonal shaped, raised decorative sections. The upper and lower portions of the panels have edges that contain the lower and upper portions ofthe hexagonal design elements, creating a decorative v-shaped edging. Macy's signage is present on all facades ofthe building on the upper portions ofthese panels. No windows are present within these panel sections.
The first floor of each fat;ade contains a pre-cast stone exterior that consists of 4"x 8" sections that resemble bricks with a pebble surface. The ubricks" are aligned in even, symmetrical rows placed side by side and add a geometric element that contrast with the hexagonal shaped design of the second and third floor panels.
No small window openings are present on the first floor sections on any of the facades. The first floor facades contain large sections of four metal and glass door entrances flanked by large, metal framed plate glass windows. The north fat;ade and the north end of the west fat;ade have been obscured by new retail construction blocking the public view. On the north fat;ade only one section of the fat;ade, a metal and glass door entrance, is visible at the end of a passage way between two new retail buildings. The south elevation and east elevations face the surrounding parking lots. The west entrance faces into the rest ofthe shopping complex.
The color scheme of the building is composed of various shades of beige, grey, and cream colored sections. Strong vertical and horizontal geometric detailing provides a variety of visual elements that blend into a cohesive design aided by the pale color palette. State of California- The Resource Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION CONTINUATION SHEET Primary# ______HRI# ______Trinomial ______Page 4 of 31 *Resource Name or# (Assigned by recorder) 1702 Camino Del Rio North, San Diego CA 92108 *Recorded by K.A. Crawford/Office of Marie Burke Lia Date 12/2015 Continuation X Update
East Facade
The east fa~:;ade contains the elements seen on the other facades- the pre-cast brick/pebble design on the ground floor and the pre-cast concrete hexagonal design panels on the second and third floors. The second and third floors extend out over the first floor, forming a covered walkway. This section is supported by square columns. An entrance of four metal and glass doors flanked by metal framed, plate glass windows is present in the center of the fa~:;ade. This portion of the building faces the east parking lot. The alterations to this fa~:;ade are documented in the 2015 East Fa~:;ade Exterior Elevation and the Addendum Memo included in Attachment E.1., the East Facade current photographs 1 to 15 in Attachment 0.2, and as discussed below.
South Facade
The south fa~:;ade contains the most decorative elements of all four facades. The south fa~:;ade can be viewed from the Interstate 8 freeway, resulting in a design that emphasized the diverse elements of the structure. This fa~:;ade contains three main sections of the structure- the three story main department store block, a two-story section, and a one-story section. The one story, rectangular shaped section is present at the east end ofthe fa~:;ade. This component of the building has no window or door openings and contains the pre-cast concrete brick/pebble design across the two facades that are visible.
The center portion of the south fa~:;ade contains the rectangular shaped, two-story section that projects outward from the main mass of the store building. This section projects out over a covered walkway along the front wall of the projection. The second story contains a wide bank of floor-to-ceiling, metal framed, plate glass windows that wrap around the fa~ade. This section is covered by a "folded plate" roof, composed of a series of small parallel roofs of a triangular cross section, which extends out past the window section. The front projection of this roof is supported by separate tall, square columns composed of white concrete.
The above referenced covered walkway begins under the east end of the projecting second story section and is supported by square columns of rough surface concrete bricks and a continuous white beam/roof section. It extends across almost the entire south fa~ade and creates the southern edge of a small open courtyard area with mature trees and grass at the west end of the structure. State of California- The Resource Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION CONTINUATION SHEET Primary# ______HRI# ______Trinomial ______Page 5 of 31 *Resource Name or# (Assigned by recorder) 1702 Camino Del Rio North. San Diego CA 92108 *Recorded by K.A. Crawford/Office of Marie Burke Lia Date 12/2015 Continuation X Update
The three-story block section contains the main department store building. This section contains the brick/pebble motif on the ground floor and the metal and glass door entrance with plate glass windows. Also, the white roof/beam walkway is present across the front face of this fa~ade, dividing the first and second floors. The second and third floors contain the pre cast concrete panels with the hexagonal design. New structures have been added to the west end of this fa~ade that obscure the original appearance of this elevation. These new structures and other alterations to this fa~ade are documented in the South Fa~ade Exterior Elevations and the Addendum Memo included in Attachment E.1., the South Fa~ade current photographs 1 to 16 in Attachment 0.2, and discussed below.
West Facade
The west fa~ade contains the same details as seen on the other facades- the pre-cast brick/pebble wall surface on the first floor and the pre-cast concrete hexagonal design panels on the second and third floors, which project out over the ground floor, continuing the covered walkway element. Two pop out display windows are present south of the entrance. This fa~ade faces the larger shopping center and open courtyard areas of the main complex. This fa~ade also contains an entrance section with four metal and glass doors flanked by metal framed, plate glass window sections.
The north end of this fa~ade has also been altered, beginning just north of the entrance, by the construction of a relatively large, new, projecting storefront containing a section of small shops. This projecting new storefront has been placed flat against the outside wall of the store building. These retail units have a flat plaster finished fa~ade with none of the decorative design elements seen elsewhere on this building. This new storefront and other alterations to this fa~ade are documented in the West Fa~ade Exterior Elevations and the Addendum Memo included in Attachment E.l., the current West Fa~ade photographs 1 to 12 in Attachment 0.2, and discussed below.
North Facade
The ground level of the north fa~ade is completely covered from public view by new retail construction on the north that extends the entire length of this fa~ade. A narrow passage way between two of these new retail buildings leads south to Macy's north entrance, which consists of the four metal and glass doors within a new decorative arch supported by round columns with Macy's sign age. Originally, as illustrated in the 1964 aerial photograph in Attachment D.l., State of California- The Resource Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION CONTINUATION SHEET Primary# ______HRI# ______Trinomial ______Page 8 of 31 *Resource Name or# (Assigned by recorder) 1702 Camino Del Rio North, San Diego CA 92108 *Recorded by K.A. Crawford/Office of Marie Burke Lia Date 12/2015 Continuation X Update
Of the 16 bays on this fa~;ade, 11 have been altered and, therefore, 69% of the South Fa~;ade is not original.
West Facade
This fa~;ade faced the rest ofthe Mission Valley Shopping Center to the south and therefore was most visible to the pedestrians patronizing the Center. It consisted of 14 bays that are documented on the attached 1959 West Fa~;ade Exterior Elevation with grid lines G1 through W, starting at the south end.
Starting at the south end, there was a rectangular courtyard created by a colonnade that surrounded an open area with planters and walkways. More specifically, between grid lines Gl and J, in addition to the colonnade, there was a pop out display window beyond that was attached to the south wall. Between grid lines J and L, the colonnade continued and there was a solid wall that flanked a pop out display window. Between grid lines Land Q, there was a solid wall and two display windows. Between grid lines Rand Q was Entrance #2, which consisted of 4 glass storefront doors and a transom flanked by 2 glass sidelights. Between grid lines Rand V, there were two more pop out display windows with solid walls in between. Between grid lines V and W there was a colonnade attached to the north side of the building.
The documented changes to this fa~ade that are shown on the 2015 West Fa~;ade Exterior Elevation are as follows. Between grid lines Gl and K, the southernmost and west portions of the colonnade have been removed. Also, the pop out display window beyond that was attached to the south wall has been removed and covered with a plaster finished wall. Moving from south to north, between grid lines J and L, two pop out display windows on the south wall were removed and replaced by plaster finished walls and a concrete platform with planters were added. Between grid lines R and S, another pop out display window was removed and replaced with a solid white plaster finish wall. Between grid lines R and W, the colonnade was removed that connected the Macy's and other westerly located mall buildings and three more pop out display windows were removed. New retail stores have been added to this portion of the Macy's building completely obscuring this portion of the West Fa~ade .
Of the 14 bays on this fa~ade, 9 have been altered and, therefore, 64% of the West Fa~ade is not original.
North Facade State of California- The Resource Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION CONTINUATION SHEET Primary# ______HRI#______Trinomial ______Page 9 of 31 *Resource Name or# (Assigned by recorder) 1702 Camino Del Rio North, San Diego CA 92108 *Recorded by K.A. Crawford/Office of Marie Burke Lia Date 12/2015 Continuation X Update
In 1959, this fa~ade faced a large parking lot that is shown in Historical Aerial Photo C and was completely visible from the nearest public thoroughfare of Camino de Ia Reina. It consisted of 16 bays that are documented on the attached 1959 North Fa~ade Exterior Elevation with grid lines 1 through 17, starting at the east end.
Of these 16 bays, 15 of them had a colonnade made up of a canopy and columns that extended beyond the face of the building. Starting at the east end, between grid lines 2 and 3, there was a solid wall. The bay between grid lines 3 and 4 had a solid double door flanked by a solid wall. There were solid walls between grid lines 4 and 6. Between grid lines 6 and 7 was a pop out display window flanked by solid walls. The bay between grid lines 7 and 8 contained Entrance #3, which included four glass doors with a transom and glass sidelights. Between grid lines 8 and 9 there was a pop out display window flanked by solid walls. The bays between 9 and 12 contained solid walls with two sets of double doors and transoms. Between grid lines 12 and 16 were solid walls.
The documented changes to this fa~ade that are shown on the 2015 North Fa~ade Exterior Elevation are as follows. 15 of the 16 bays have been altered where the colonnade was completely removed. The brick wall finish is all that remains intact for most ofthe historic fa~ade, below the former canopy. However, this fa~ade is not in public view because it has been altered by attached walls and adjacent buildings and, at the entrance, by a projected arched canopy with eight large, round columns that extend into flanking bays. Although the entrance continues in its same location, the rest ofthe building functions as a service area and no longer as a retail fa~ade.
More specifically, between grid lines 1 and 2, the pop out display window facing east has been removed. Between grid lines 2 and 3, a new gate has been attached to the Macy's fa~ade. Between grid lines 3 and 6, the solid walls, solid double door and transom remain. Also between grid lines 2 and 5, the May Co. sign has been removed and replaced by a Macy's sign. Between grid lines 5 and 6, a new wall has been attached to the fa~ade and a new glazed tile finish and a concrete planter have been added. Within the bay between grid lines 6 and 7, there is a solid wall where the pop out display window used to exist, and a new glazed wall tile finish and a concrete planter have been added. Additionally, the new entrance canopy that was added starts east of grid line 7 and ends just west of grid line 8. Between grid lines 8 and 9, the second pop out display window on this fa~ade was removed. Also added was the glazed wall tile finish and a concrete planter that both extend into this bay and beyond into the bay between grid lines 9 and 10. A wall and service door located perpendicular to Macy's wall face State of California -The Resource Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION CONTINUATION SHEET Primary# ______HRI#______Trinomial______Page 10 of 31 *Resource Name or# (Assigned by recorder) 1702 Camino Del Rio North. San Diego CA 92108 *Recorded by K.A. Crawford/Office of Marie Burke lia Date 12/2015 Continuation X Update were also added to the fac;ade at this location. Between grid lines 10 and 13, solid walls and two sets of double doors with transoms remain. At the bays between grid lines 13 and 17, a restroom and retail space have been added to the face of Macy's building. At the south end of this fac;ade, the colonnade on the south has also been removed.
Most of the original North fac;ade has been permanently removed, significantly altered or obscured from view. The only remaining original element is the glass entrance with its four doors, transom and sidelights. Therefore, 15 of the 16 bays of this fac;ade have been altered and 94% of this fac;ade is not original.
Sections Cut at North Facade
The impacts of the alterations to the North Fac;ade are further illustrated by the Sections Cut at the North Side of Building included With the 2015 North Fac;ade Exterior Elevation drawings. The removal of the 1958 colonnade that extended across the full length of this fac;ade is shown. The drastic impact of the replacement of the colonnade with new retail construction along this fac;ade is also illustrated in the attached current photographs of it in Attachment D.2.
Property History
M ission Va lley History
Mission Valley includes all the land between overlying mesas on the lower ten miles ofthe San Diego River from the rocky constriction of Mission Gorge to the lowlands of Mission Bay. The San Diego River runs through the center of Mission Valley, emptying into the San Diego Bay.
The history of Mission Valley began long before the arrival of Spanish missionaries and soldiers in 1769. Originally home to the Kumeyaay tribes, the area had been inhabited for centuries prior to the development of the area by Europeans. Villages and settlements dotted the valley floor for centuries, as the groups were drawn by the water of the river and the abundance of plant and animal life. Their way of life would be greatly altered by the arrival of the Spanish in 1769. Spain sought to anchor its North American empire by exploring and creating a strong military and religious presence in California to prevent the Russians at Fort Ross from encroaching further south. To accomplish this strategic move, the Spanish crown sent Father Junipero Serra, with the military support of Don Gaspar de Portola, to advance into Alta California by land and by sea from their empire in Mexico in 1769. State of California- The Resource Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION CONTINUATION SHEET Primary# ______HRI#______Trinomial, ______Page 11 of 31 *Resource Name or# (Assigned by recorder) 1702 Camino Del Rio North. San Diego CA 92108 *Recorded by K.A. Crawford/Office of Marie Burke lia Date 12/2015 Continuation X Update
The various contingents began to arrive in the summer of 1769. Father Serra chose a hill at the west end of Mission Valley to begin his operations to convert the local tribes. The Royal Presidio of San Diego was established on what is still known as Presidio Hill and the first mission was established within the confines of the fort. Difficulties with the soldiers and the local tribes convinced Father Serra that the mission should be moved four miles up the river valley and the Mission San Diego de Alcala was established.
By the 1820s, due to the successful completion of the Mexican independence movement, Mission Valley was part of the Mexican empire. The vast mission lands were granted to faithful supporters of the new government, and the missions were secularized. The lands were given away to become part of large rancho holdings and the huge herds of cattle, sheep and horses moved into the hands of private owners. The local Kumeyaay tribes suffered greatly as their dependence on the Mission system had become vital to their survival, and now that the support was gone, their lives became one of poverty and despair. In later decades, they would be given reservation land, which did not truly alleviate their situation.
The Alta California area, including Mission Valley, was the northernmost part of the Mexican empire and continued to be neglected by the Mexican government. The United States was expanding rapidly at this time, spreading across the North American continent in its quest for "Manifest Destiny." Boston trading ships had called at the port of San Diego for decades, bringing hides and tallow from the local ranchos back to the industrial centers of the East Coast. Businessmen and visionaries were eyeing the possibilities of California and its fine ports in San Francisco and San Diego. Its wonderful climate also offered promises to farmers and orchardists. By 1846, various political and military events led the United States into war with
Mexico and from 1846 to 1848, capturing the attention of Americans and the possibilities offered by the West Coast regions. The war concluded with the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo which transferred Mexican holdings north of the Rio Grande River to the United States. California and San Diego, were now American territory. In 1850, California statehood formally brought California into the Union and life changed in San Diego as Americans thronged into California with its lush lands and promise of gold in various forms.
As Americans moved into California, the San Diego River Valley drew new residents interested in dry farming. From 1850-1870, dry farming became a major economic development on the valley floor. The valley lands would go through periods of intense agricultural development over the next 100 years, alternating with low periods, depending upon the larger political and State of California -The Resource Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION CONTINUATION SHEET Primary# ______HRI# ______Trinomial ______Page 12 of 31 *Resource Name or# (Assigned by recorder) 1702 Camino Del Ri o North, San Diego CA 92108 *Recorded by K.A. Crawford/ Office of Marie Burke Lia Date 12/2015 Continuation X Update economic developments in San Diego. Floods periodically caused havoc in the valley, damaging crops and homes and necessitating a rebuilding process.
The situation began to change significantly when Alonzo Horton purchased land further south of Mission Valley to begin his dream of a new city that came to be known as New Town. By 1870, patterns were shifting, the move to the new city had begun, stores and residences were going up, port facilities were under construction, and Old Town was slowly dying. By 1873, San Diego's population was over 1,500 people, the majority living in New Town. The city would continue to grow by leaps and bounds as the promise of the railroad made commercial and economic success viable. The city underwent a "boom and bust" cycle in the 1880s but recovered and has continued to grow into one of the largest cities in the United States.
As the population increased exponentially every ten years, pressure increased on local farmers to produce enough food. Mission Valley underwent continuous development to create more intensive agricultural production and the farms in the valley produced significant amounts of food. This process was aided by the improvement of pumping equipment allowing for better irrigation of the farm lands. By 1879, truck gardens and dairies extended across the bottom lands all the way to the old Mission San Diego de Alcala.
Larger statewide and national events caused changes in San Diego. Asian immigration increased during the decades of the late 1800s, resulting in a rise in population in San Diego. Many of the new immigrants leased land in Mission Valley, creating successful vegetable farms. Chinese fishermen had been in the city for decades but the Chinese farmers were working the valley lands by the 1890s. Japanese farmers arrived in the early twentieth century. The farm lands were intensively cultivated, producing tons of vegetables each year. The farmers added poultry, orchards, and vines to the list of products produced in the valley. Two large poultry ranches produced eggs and chickens for local consumption.
Dairies were also part of the economic development of Mission Valley. They developed in response to the nearby urban market and increased in numbers as that market expanded. The valley had cheap, flat land and the space needed for dairy operations. Dairymen focused on shipping cream to market until1916 when Ernest Briden started bottling milk. Others quickly followed his lead. The Challenge Cream and Butter Association was located at the southeast corner of the valley and eventually became a major retailer of dairy products. By 1960, it had become a wholesale distributor of dairy products. State of California- The Resource Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION CONTINUATION SHEET Primary# ______HRI#______Trinomial. ______Page 13 of 31 *Resource Name or# (Assigned by recorder) 1702 Camino Del Rio North, San Diego tA 92108 *Recorded by K.A. Crawford/Office of Marie Burke Ua Date 12/2015 Continuation X Update
San Diego was the first port of entry north of the Mexican border, a militarily strategic point. Starting in the 1890s, with the creation of the "two-ocean navy," San Diego became a critical component in the nation's military operations. With its important harbor and location on the West Coast facing Asia, San Diego was destined to play a key role in 20th century events. This wave of development would continue to the present time, resulting in a huge military presence in San Diego County. This, in turn, led to an increased need for land, food and goods and services. In the post-World War II period, the suburbs would undergo extensive development all of which would change Mission Valley permanently.
The large scale commercial development of Mission Valley began in this post-World War II period. Over the decades, commercial gravel and sand operations had begun to operate in the area. Horse farms and riding stables had become numerous, and a polo club drew participants. Commercialization existed on a relatively small scale until the 1950s. Three factors shaped the future of Mission Valley post-1950- flood control, road construction and pressure from population growth. The construction of freeways through the valley changed the valley irrevocably.
By 1953, the two lanes of Highway 80, the main east/west highway through Mission Valley, were expanded to four lanes and in that same year, the C.J. Brown family opened the Town & Country Hotel and Club at the western end of the Valley. Subsequently, planning began for the second commercial development, The Mission Valley Inn, followed by the Mission Valley Lodge in 1956. In 1957, the Bowlero, "the West Coast's Largest Bowling Center," was opened. By 1957, the Mission Valley Country Club became the Stardust Motor Hotel and Westgate Park was completed for the San Diego Padres. 1959 brought the Rancho Presidio (later Hanalei Hotel), the King's Inn and the Vagabond Motor Hotel. In October of 1957, the May Company announced plans for an $18 million "major department store and shopping center in Mission Valley." The store planned for the Mission Valley site in order to draw trade from the San Diego, El Centro, Oceanside, and Escondido areas.
In March of 1958, the May Company presented formal plans to the San Diego City Council for its "Mission Valley Shopping Center" project. The Los Angeles based architectural firm of Albert C. Martin presented the plans for a $20 million, 80 acre shopping center. In April of 1958, the City Council approved the May Company's request to rezone the 90 acres in Mission Valley for commercial use. Although the project was opposed by a variety of groups, a poll taken in 1958 found that 79% of San Diego residents favored the project. When completed, the project was to provide "the largest and most complete facility for shopping south of downtown Los State of California- The Resource Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION CONTINUATION SHEET Primary# ______HRI#______Trinomial ______Page 14 of 31 *Resource Name or# (Assigned by recorder) 1702 Camino Del Rio North, San Diego CA 92108 *Recorded by K.A. Crawford/Office of Marie Burke Lia Date 12/2015 Continuation X Update
Angeles." Construction of the shopping center commenced in July 1959 and was completed in February of 1961,
In 1958, construction started on a new principal interchange for Highway 163 (395) and Interstate 8 (formerly 80). By 1960, these routes had been converted to full freeways. Lanes went from four to eight and large sections of Mission Valley land were converted from farm use to transportation use. By 1960, over 350 acres had been switched to transportation. Over 50,000 vehicles a day passed through the valley on these new highways and the traffic would grow continuously in the coming decades.
Due to the unprecedented population growth and expansion of the freeway system, Mission Valley became a prime location for new uses to accommodate the growing demands of the residents of San Diego. It also offered a wide range of economic opportunities and soon the development of the farm lands began in earnest. The effect of the new transportation systems was to increase land values substantially and land use correspondingly changed and intensified. Commercial ventures moved into the lands adjacent to the interchanges and exit ramps on the freeways, slowly replacing the dairies and farms with new types of businesses.
By 1968, more than half of Mission Valley had been converted from agricultural use to commercial use. In 1969, the second large shopping center, Fashion Valley, was added to the west end of the valley. Commercial growth continued at an unprecedented pace and by 1975, the majority ofthe valley had been converted to commercial use. The construction ofthe San Diego Stadium (now Qualcomm) in 1967 took more of the valley land away for large parking lots and stadium grounds. The dairies and farms had given way to the push of urbanization, following a national post-World War II pattern across the country.
Building History
Assessor's Office Records:
The subject property at 1702 Camino del Rio North occupies Lot 4 ofthe Mission Valley Shopping Center according to Map No. 4244 filed in the office of the County Recorder on June 30, 1959, Assessor's Parcel Number 438-030-06. Copies of this original Subdivision Map No. 4244 and the current Parcel Map are included in Attachments C.3 and C.4. State of California- The Resource Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION CONTINUATION SHEET Primary# ------HRI#______Trinomial______Page 15 of 31 *Resource Name or# (Assigned by recorder) 1702 Camino Del Rio North, San Diego CA 92108 *Recorded by K.A. Crawford/Office of Marie Burke Lia Date 12/2015 Continuation X Update
The relevant ownership of this property is as follows: In October of 1957, the Mission Valley Partnership was formed by the May Mission Valley Corporation, the Mission Camino Del Rio Corporation, a group of Mission Valley property owners and the Valley Land Company. The purpose ofthe. Mission Valley Partnership, as stated in its Certificate of Limited Partnership, was to own and develop real estate assets including the development, construction, operation, management and maintenance of a shopping center. The General Partner was listed as the May Mission Valley Corporation with the Limited Partners listed as May Camino Del Rio Corporation, W.B. Miller, William V. Miller, Margaret M. White, Ross H. Bond, Ross H. Bond Jr., Paula D. Bond, Elaine B. Marteeny, and Valley Land Company.
In June of 1959, the Mission Valley Partnership granted to The May Department Stores Company specific and contingent portions of Pueblo Lots within Mission Valley pursuant to a recorded Grant Deed. Parcell was conveyed in that Grant Deed for the purpose of constructing a building and other improvements for the operation of a retail department store. Parcel II consisted of the right and easement in, over, and upon such portions of the surface and subsurface of the Shopping Center as shall constitute common areas to enter upon, use such common areas in common with the Grantor and others for the respective purposes for which the common areas shall be maintained. A lessee/landlord agreement between the above two parties was concluded in August 1960. A total of 16 amendments to the Limited Partnership were recorded between 1962 and 2012.
By December of 1997, the Westfield Mission Valley Corporation and the Westfield America Limited Partnership had become Members of the property owner, the Mission Valley Partnership. A Chain of Title for the property is included as Attachment B.l.
No Notice of Completion was recorded for the property.
Assessor's Building Record
In November and December of 1959, City Building Permits, including Permit #A22605 and others, were issued for the construction of a department store. The original construction included a three-story building with elevator and escalators, a basement and a tunnel. The store occupied 383,000 square feet, excluding the tunnel. The building was a Class B, Type 4, 3- story building of reinforced concrete construction. The exterior was of pre-cast stone and pre cast concrete. This Record does not address the new construction on the north and west State of California -The Resource Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION CONTINUATION SHEET Primary# ______HRI#______Trinomia l, ______Page 16 of 31 *Resource Name or# (Assigned by recorder) 1702 Camino Del Rio North, San Diego CA 92108 *Recorded by K.A. Crawford/Office of Marie Burke Ua Date 12/2015 Continuation X Update
fa~ades of this building. A copy of the Assessor's Building Record is included in Attachment A.l.
Building Permit Records were located for the property. A total of 37 building permits dating from the time of construction of the building to the present have beeh issued for changes to the structure. Only 4 of these permits were relevant to the exterior of the building as follows:
November 1959 #A22605 Department Store FrankL. Hope & Albert C. Martin November 1959 #A22603 Heating & Cooling Plan Frank L. Hope & Albert C. Martin December 1959 #A22003 Department Store FrankL. Hope & Albert C. Martin March 1961 #A4002? Auto Center Frank L. Hope & Albert C. Martin June 1961 #A62153 Signs October 1961 #A46418 Screen wall sign on roof March 2013 #232116 Installation of 8' panel antennas
Copies of all 37 building permits are included in Attachment A.4.
No Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps were located for the property.
Historic and current aerial and ground level photographs were reviewed for information related to the subject property.
A 1953 aerial photograph of the subject property shows the property in use as farm land. A 1959-1961 aerial photograph ofthe subject property shows the May Company Building and the Shopping Center under construction. A 1964 aerial photograph shows the building and the shopping center in its early form, surrounding by parking lots. An undated color rendering shows the finished complex when farmland still existed to the north. A 2003 aerial photograph shows the subject property and additional retail construction to the north and west. A 2013 aerial photograph facing southeast shows some of the new construction on the west fa<;ade. A 2013 aerial photograph facing northwest shows the new construction adjacent to the north fa<;ade. These photographs are included in Appendix D.1.
Ground level photographs of all visible facades, taken in 2015 document the many subsequent alterations and are included in Appendix D.2. State of California- The Resource Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION CONTINUATION SHEET Primary# ______HRI#______Trinomial______Page 17 of 31 *Resource Name or# (Assigned by recorder) 1702 Camino Del Rio North, San Diego CA 92108 *Recorded by K.A. Crawford/Office of Marie Burke Lia Date 12/2015 Continuation X Update
The Water Department and Sewer Department Records for the City of San Diego are dated in 1959 and 1960. They are included in the Appendix A.3.
No Lot Block Book Page exists for this property.
The San Diego City Directories indicate that the subject property was occupied by the May Company Department Store from 1961 to 1993 and by Macy's Department Store from 1994 to the present.
William (Bill) Lewis
Historical research indicates that the primary or "lead" architectural firm that designed the 1702 Camino Del Rio North building in 1959 was Albert C. Martin (A.C. Martin) & Associates of Los Angeles. The principal of this firm was architect Albert Carey (A. C.) Martin. Several years earlier in 1939, this firm designed the May Company Building (Wilshire) in Los Angeles.
Since Albert C. Martin & Associates was based in Los Angeles, the company contracted with a local, San Diego-based architectural firm to facilitate project submittal and processing. This local firm was Frank L. Hope & Associates, of which architect Frank L. Hope, Sr. was the principal. Although the design ofthe 1702 Camino Del Rio North building has been attributed by some sources to be the work of FrankL. Hope and his architectural firm, historical research indicates that this was not the case.
In a telephone interview conducted by Historian Scott A. Moomjian with San Diego architect William (Bill) Lewis in November 2015, Mr. Lewis discussed his role in the design of the 1702 Camino Del Rio North building while he was employed as a lead designer for A.C. Martin & Associates from the early to late 1950s. According to Mr. Lewis, he was the individual responsible for the design of the building, rather than Mr. Hope or any other architect employed at Hope's firm. Hope served merely as a "figurehead" and "didn't do anything" with respect to creating the design for the building. Mr. Lewis stated that he and his firm met often with Mr. Thomas May, the son ofthe founder of the May Company, who wanted to construct a May Company building in San Diego (which would be the eighth building in the company chain). Mr. May was cognizant of the established presence of the Marston's and Walker-Scott department stores downtown and wanted to make shopping more convenient by taking it out of the downtown area. To this end, he selected Mission Valley for the location of the new building, and directed Lewis to design a "soft" Contemporary style structure. According to Mr. State of California- The Resource Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION CONTINUATION SHEET Primary# ______HRI#______Trinomial. ______Page 18 of 31 *Resource Name or# (Assigned by recorder) 1702 Camino Del Rio North, San Diego CA 92108 *Recorded by K.A. Crawford/Office of Marie Burke Lia Date 12/2015 Continuation X Update
Lewis, the "stylish box" design for the structure was intended to provide shopping convenience for customers, and became the structure which anchored the Mission Valley shopping center (the first suburban shopping center in San Diego). This new model represented a successful "change in commercial design work" which ultimately transformed the design of subsequent commercial development in San Diego, and represented a new phase in the evolution of shopping center design. Mr. Lewis indicated that his design of the 1702 Camino Del Rio North building was notable as it established him as a young popular commercial architect, which led to several new commercial contacts.
Deems, Lewis. Martin & Associates1
Architect William (Bill) Sperry Lewis, Jr., was active in A.C. Martin & Associates as well as the firm of Deems Lewis (of which he was a principal). Lewis's partner, Ward Deems, was born in November 1929 in Hollywood, California. Raised in Alhambra and Pasadena/Altadena, Deems graduated from Pasadena High School in 1947 and then Pasadena Community College in 1949. While in high school, he worked as a carpenter, framer, and home builder and then worked as a draftsman with other architects in Monrovia and Claremont while attending junior college.
After graduating from USC's School of Architecture in 1953, Deems joined the Los Angeles firm of AC Martin. Lewis, who also graduated from USC's architecture program in 1953, joined the firm shortly thereafter. In 1958, Deems was appointed Associate of the firm Lewis served as lead designer on several projects. In 1958-1959, Deems explored the potential of opening an office in San Diego, which was then considered to be a cheaper, slower-paced city which survived on tourism funds and military spending. When Deems advised the AC Martin firm of his plan to move south, they saw an opportunity to expand their operation. Together, they all decided to open a San Diego office.
In April 1959, a corporate agreement was signed to launch "Deems-Martin Associates." At the time, Lewis was completing the design of the May Company store in Mission Valley and agreed to join Deems in launching the new company. With financial and brand support from the AC Martin firm, they opened their office in the El Cortez Building. Deems was responsible for public relations and business development functions, while Lewis focused on design and project
1 For more information related to the life and work of Ward Deems and Bill Lewis, see Scott A. Moomjian, Historical Resource Research Report For The 303 A Street Building, San Diego, California 92101 (February 2013). Most of the biographical material on these architects and their firm was obtained from www.modernsandiego.com. State of California -The Resource Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION CONTINUATION SHEET Primary# ______HRI#______Trinomial ______Page 19 of 31 *Resource Name or# (Assigned by recorder) 1702 Ca mino Del Rio North, San Diego CA 92108 *Recorded by K.A. Craw ford/Office of Marie Burke Lia Date 12/2015 Continuation X Update
management. Within a few years, Lewis became a co-owner and the firm then became "Deems Lewis Martin & Associates."
In 1961, the firm became known as "Deems/Lewis & Partners" and worked its way through their first San Diego recession. Embracing the city-wide motto "Try San Diego First" they and other firms worked to keep clients from heading to Los Angeles to have their projects designed. The firm watched San Diego grow larger and more sophisticated. The firm's design for the Mission Valley Shopping Center represented the future of retail as it shifted from downtown to Mission Valley during the time frame that private automobiles replaced street cars, taking away patrons from Walker Scott and Marston's. In 1973, Deems was inducted as a Fellow of the American Institute of Architects. Work produced by the firm in later years included the San Diego Convention Center, Torrey Pines High School, the UCSD Humanities Library, the San Diego Main Post Office on Midway, the U.S. Border Crossing at San Ysidro, Con dura Publications in Scripps Ranch, and the Armand Hammer Research Facilities at the Salk Institute in La Jolla. Lewis became a Fellow of the AlA in 1983 and today resides in Del Mar, California. Although he has retired from the practice of architecture, he serves as an occasional architectural consultant. Over the years, Bill Lewis and his firms have been awarded over 60 design awards (most of which were given for his commercial design work). Mr. Lewis has acknowledged that he is best known "for commercial work" and only engaged in residential designs "for friends." The San Diego Modern Dot Com article on the career of Mr. Lewis is included in Attachment E.1 to this Report.
B. 10 Significance Evaluations
Integrity
In addition to determining the significance of a property under local, state and federal criteria, it is necessary to assess whether the property has integrity. Integrity is the ability of a property to convey and maintain its significance. A property must not only be shown to be significant under the established criteria, it must also have integrity. In order to retain historic integrity, a property must possess several, and usually most, of the seven key aspects of integrity, which are location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling and association.
Application of the City's Guidelines for finding Integrity: State of California- The Resource Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION CONTINUATION SHEET Primary# ______HRI#'------Trinomial ______Page 20 of 31 *Resource Name or# (Assigned by recorder) 1702 Camino Del Ri o North. San Diego CA 92108 * Recorded by K.A. Crawford/Office of Marie Burke Lia Date 12/2015 Continuation X Update
According to the City's Guidelines for the application of the Historical Resources Board Designation Criteria, 2 there are two important principles for understanding Integrity:
1. Integrity is the authenticity of a historical resource's physical integrity clearly indicated by the retention of characteristics that existed during the resource's period of significance.
2. Integrity relates to the presence or absence of historic materials and character defining features.
"Historical resources eligible for designation by the HRB must meet one or more of the designation criteria and retain enough of their historic character or appearance to be recognizable as historical resources and to convey the reasons for their historical significance." 3 [Emphasis added]
As indicated in Section B6 Alterations above, this building was originally constructed as a commercial department store. The building has undergone significant alterations over the decades to all four facades.
Application of the seven aspects of integrity:
Location: Location is the place where the historic property was constructed or the place where the historic event occurred. The subject building remains at its original location at 1702 Camino Del Rio North, San Diego.
Design: Design is the combination of elements that create the form, plan, space, structure, and style of a property. The building does not retain its original design because of its exterior alterations as discussed above and the ongoing construction of the shopping complex around it over the past 60 years. The original design as a stand-alone department store at the north end of a shopping mall has been lost as new and unrelated buildings have covered its north fa~ade and changes have been made to large segments of its other facades. As documented in the graphic comparisons of the 1959 Elevations with the 2015 Elevations and the related
2 Guidelines for the Application of Historical Resources Board Designation Criteria, page 3, Historical Resources Guidelines, Appendix E, Part 2. 3 Ibid. Page 3. State of California- The Resource Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION CONTINUATION SHEET Primary# ______HRI#______Trinomial ______Page 21 of 31 *Resource Name or# (Assigned by recorder) 1702 Camino Del Rio North, San Di ego CA 92108 *Recorded by K.A. Cra wford/ OffiCe of Marie Burke Ua Date 12/2015 Continuation X Update
Addendum Memo included in Attachment E.l., the North Fa~ade has lost 94% its original design, the South Fa~ade has lost 69% of its original design, the East Fa~ade has lost 29% of its original design and the West Fa~ade has lost 64% of its original design. The design aspect of integrity is not present.
Setting: Setting is the physical environment of a historic property. As indicated by the review of the historic and current aerial photographs, as well as visual observation of the area, in 1959 Mission Valley was still a rural underdeveloped area of the City. The area has undergone a complete transformation to a highly urbanized, commercial and transportation corridor running through the center of Mission Valley. As a result, the property has not maintained its historic physical environment from its 1959 period of construction
Materials: Materials are the physical elements that were combined or deposited during a particular period of time and in a particular pattern or configuration to form a historic property. The property's physical elements from 1959 have not been maintained. Modifications of all of its facades, ranging from 29% to 94%, have resulted in the loss of wall surfaces, display windows, storefronts, colonnades, door and window openings, and adjacent open space. The property has not maintained its materials aspect of integrity.
Workmanship: Workmanship is the physical evidence of the crafts of a particular culture or people during any given period in history or prehistory. The quality of the original workmanship has not been maintained from the original construction due to the various levels of alterations as described above. Therefore, this aspect of the building's integrity has not been maintained.
Feeling: Feeling is a property's expression of the aesthetic or historic sense of a particular period of time. This commercial department store has not maintained the original feeling of the property due to its major fa~ade alterations and the addition of the other components of the shopping center. It is no longer a stand-alone department store at the end of a mall, it has been surrounded by the mall and dense commercial development on all sides and it is only one in a collection of comparably sized newer buildings around it.
Association: Association is the direct link between an important historic event or person and a historic property. The property has not been determined to be directly linked to an important historic person or event. Therefore, it does not have an associative element. State of California -The Resource Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION CONTINUATION SHEET Primary# ______HRI#______Trinomial ______Page 21 of 31 *Resource Name or# (Assigned by recorder) 1702 Camino Del Rio North. San Diego CA 92108 *Recorded by K.A. Crawford/Office of Marie Burke Ua Date 12/2015 Continuation X Update
Conclusion: Of the seven aspects of integrity, the building does not retain six of the seven aspects of integrity- design, setting, feeling, workmanship, materials, and association. The only aspect of its integrity that remains is location. Therefore, it has not retained sufficient integrity for designation purposes.
Historic Context
According to the Guidelines for the Application of Historical Resources Board Designation Criteria, the significance of a historic property can be judged and explained only when it is evaluated in its historic context. Historic contexts are those patterns or trends in history by which a specific occurrence, property or site is understood and its meaning (and ultimately its significance) within history is made clear. In order to decide whether a property is significant within its historic context, the following things must be determined. 4
1. Identify the themes, geographical limits and chronological period that the property represents:
The building was constructed as a department store in 1959 in a rural, underdeveloped environment. Mission Valley was a region of small farms, dairies, and homes prior to 1959. This building was one of the early examples of the commercial development in Mission Valley in the late 1950s and 1960s. The Modern Contemporary style was very popular for commercial buildings during this period and the vast majority of development in this area is of that style. The theme is early Modern Contemporary style commercial development in Mission Valley in the 1950s and 1960s.
2. Determine how the theme of the context is significant in the history of the local area:
Mission Valley was first settled by the Spanish missionaries in the late 1700s. The area transitioned through control by the Mexican government and by the 1850s, had passed into the hands of the Americans. During the last half of the 19th century, the area was used for agriculture and livestock. Small farms and homes dotted the valley floor and a narrow road ran along the edges of the valley. During the 1950s, with the advent of freeway construction and expanding San Diego population and growth, development ofthe valley area became a
4 Guidelines for the Application of Historical Resources Board Designation Criteria, page 2 State of California -The Resource Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION CONTINUATION SHEET Primary# ______HRI#______Trinomial ______Page 23 of 31 *Resource Na me or# (Assigned by recorder) 1702 Camino Del Rio North. San Diego CA 92108 *Recorded by K.A. Crawford/Office of Marie Burke Ua Date 12/2015 Continuation X Update commercially viable activity. The development of the subject property is part of this process of transition, growth, new uses for the valley land and commercial expansion of San Diego over the last two hundred years.
3. Determine what the property type is and whether it is important in illustrating the historic context:
The property type is a commercial department store that is a much altered example of a Modern Contemporary style commercial bu ilding. The building is not important in representing the historic context because it one of many Modern Contemporary buildings constructed in Mission Valley during the 1950s and 1960s. It is one of many commercial buildings that were constructed as part of the overall process of change and development of the Mission Valley area during this period. The Mission Valley area is filled with hotels, restaurants, office buildings, car dealerships, and retail operations of all types. The major alterations to all four facades of the building and its incorporation into a complex of newer buildings also prevent it from illustrating the historic context.
4. Determine how the property represents the context through HRB Criteria:
The property does not represent a special element of any aspect of the City's development under Criterion A as an example of a department store in Mission Valley. It was one ofthe early commercial establishments in the Mission Valley area but, as discussed above and below, its subsequent alterations to all four facades eliminated its physical integrity and its status as a special element under Criterion A. It is not identified with persons or events significant in local, state or national history under Criterion B: Person . The commercial department store does not embody the distinctive characteristics of a style, type, period or method of the Modern Contemporary architectural style under Criterion C due to the extensive alterations which have severely reduced the architectural integrity of the facades. The building does not exemplify the use of indigenous materials or craftsmanship under Criterion C.
The building was designed by designed c.1959 by WilliamS. lewis Jr. (Bill lewis) of the Albert C. Martin & Associates of los Angeles. The local, San Diego-based architectural firm of Frankl. Hope & Associates was used to facilitate project submittal and processing. In its current appearance and configuration today, the property does not represent the work of a Master Architect. State of California- The Resource Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION CONTINUATION SHEET Primary# ______HRI#______Trinomial, ______Page 24 of 31 *Resource Name or# (Assigned by recorder) 1702 Camino Del Rio North. San Diego CA 92.108 Recorded by K.A. Crawford/Office of Marie Burke Lia Date 12/2015 Continuation X Update
5. Determine what physical features the property must possess in order for it to reflect the significance of the historic context:
In order for the property to reflect the late 1950s Modern Contemporary construction in Mission Valley, it would have to have retained its original physical form, design, appearance and setting.
Application of the Guidelines for the Application of HRB Designation Criteria
According to the Guidelines for the Application of Historical Resources Board Designation Criteria, Land Development Manual, Historical Resources Guidelines, Appendix E, Part 2, a building, structure, sign, interior element and fixture, feature, site, place, district, area or object may be designated as a historic resource by the City of San Diego Historical Resources Board if it meets any of the following criteria.
Criterion A: Communitv Development: If it exemplifies or reflects special elements of a City's, a community's or a neighborhood's historical, archaeological, cultural, social, economic, political, aesthetic, engineering, landscaping or architectural development.
Special elements of development refer to a resource that is distinct among others of its kind or that surpass the usual in significance.
An analysis of the subject property under this criterion has led to the conclusion that, when this building was constructed in 1959, it represented a special element of the City's economic development in the retail industry in the 1950s.
In the post-World War II era in the United States, the nation experienced a significant upswing in the economy. Jobs were plentiful, salaries were stable, new housing tracts were under con,stant development, more leisure time and more disposable income, the advertising industry was at an all-time high, more people were attending colleges and universities under the G.l. Bill, and automobile sales were booming. The stable economy allowed young families to purchase cars in greater quantities than ever before and the automobile industry was producing cars at a rapid pace.
With the increased mobility of the nation, the 1950s saw the development of a new type of shopping experience- the suburban shopping center or mall. A shopping mall is a modern, State of California- The Resource Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION CONTINUATION SHEET Primary# ______HRI# ______Trinomial. ______Page 25 of 31 *Resource Name or# (Assigned by recorder) 1702 Camino Del Rio North. San Diego CA 92108 *Recorded by K.A. Crawford/Office of Marie Burke lia Date 12/2015 Continuation X Update
primarily North American, term for a shopping district or center, in which one or more buildings form a complex of shops representing merchandise with interconnecting walkways that enable the customer to walk from unit to unit.
The suburban shopping center fit the new reality of the 1950s lifestyle perfectly. Women were not working in large numbers at this point, and, as the person who acquired all things needed for the family, women became the primary shoppers for the family. Men were purchasing lawn mowers, car parts, yard equipment and home repair materials so the development of large scale home improvement centers became increasingly popular, replacing many of the small owner-operated hardware stores. The large housing tracts that were built outside of the downtown or older core areas of cities provided a large pool of potential consumers. The development of freeways made reaching outlying areas much more feasible, and, since large parcels of land could be purchased more cheaply than urban real estate, it was a natural fit to create large shopping centers with "one-stop shopping" that could be reached easily by the suburban family with a car.
The development of shopping centers created a major economic shift across America. The downtown department stores faded as customers preferred to shop closer to home where there was plentiful parking. The shopping centers were easy to access, unlike the downtown areas where traffic was much heavier, parking was limited, crime was a potential risk, and not too far from home. As the residential base of each city moved to the suburban areas, the residents of the new modern ranch style houses with big yards and barbecues no longer wanted the problems of shopping "downtown." American cities went into a decline during the 1950s as these new trends reshaped the American economy.
The development of Mission Valley in the post-war period became a rl)icrocosm of the larger American experience. The area had been used for various types of commercial development dairies, race track, farms producing vegetables for local consumption and other small sale operations. The construction of the freeway system through Mission Valley was a transformative event as it now made access to the valley floor a simple matter and created a major north-south and east-west corridor that linked the valley to the urban core areas and the outlying suburban communities. Hotels began to develop along this corridor as tourism began to thrive and new entertainment venues offered the families traveling by car new places to stay in "motels" (motor hotels) and lots of fun things to do.
The construction of the May Company building in the 1950s was directly linked to the larger national trends and the impact of these trends on the economic development of San Diego State of California -The Resource Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION CONTINUATION SHEET Primary# ______HRI# ______Trinomial ______Page 26 of 31 *Resource Name or# (Assigned by recorder) 1702 Camino Del Rio North, San Diego CA 92108 *Recorded by K.A. Crawford/Office of Marie Burke Lia Date 12/2015 Continuation X Update during this period. The May Company was the first department store constructed in Mission Valley, and according to newspaper articles, the "largest department store south of Los Angeles." The beach and inland communities did not have the population numbers of level of economic development necessary to support an enterprise ofthat size. However, the city of San Diego did have the economic capacity and population growth in the post-war era to make it a viable economic investment for the May Company corporation.
According to the project architect, Bill Lewis, Mr. Thomas May was cognizant of the established presence of the Marston's and Walker-Scott department stores downtown and wanted to make shopping more convenient by taking it out of the downtown area. To this end, he selected Mission Valley for the location of the new building, and directed Lewis to design a "soft" Contemporary style structure.
The May Company served as the anchor store for the development of the Mission Valley Shopping Center. It was sited immediately adjacent to the new freeway system close to the connection of Highways 8 and 163 so it was instantly visible from Highway 8. It was located close to the hotel/motels that were beginning to dot Mission Valley with their potential customers. Due to the freeway system, it was easily accessible from Hillcrest, North Park Downtown San Diego, La Mesa, El Cajon, and the beach communities- all sources of customers, enough to create a strong economic return on the May Company's investment. Future stores and further development of the adjoining properties into the newly popular "malls" was part of the long-range plan.
After due consideration, the construction of the anchor May Company department store in 1959 in Mission Valley is considered to be a "special element" of the economic development of Mission Valley and San Diego. The construction of the "largest department store south of Los Angeles" laid the foundation for further economic growth of the Mission Valley Shopping Center into a major shopping mall in the city of San Diego at the present time. In addition, the success ofthe shopping center drew customers and their spending power away from the retail areas of downtown San Diego, Hillcrest and North Park in large measure, causing an economic decline in these areas, as well as other parts of the city and county. Therefore, the construction of the May Company department store is considered to meet the criteria for Criterion A: as a "special element" of San Diego and Mission Valley's economic development. However, the building's major alterations have deprived it of the "integrity" required for historical designation. State of California- The Resource Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION CONTINUATION SHEET Primary# ______HRI#______Trinomial ______Page 27 of 31 *Resource Name or# (Assigned by recorder) 1702 Camino Del Rio North, San Diego CA 92108 *Recorded by K.A. Crawford/Office of Marie Burke Ua Date 12/2015 Continuation X Update
Criterion 8: Person: Is identified with persons or events significant in local, state, or national history;
No historical evidence was identified that would support the determination that the property was identified with any person or event of importance in local, state or national history.
Criterion C: Architecture: Embodies distinctive characteristics of a style, type, period or method of construction or is a valuable example of the use of indigenous materials or craftsmanship;
The subject property, located at 1702 Camino Del Rio North, San Diego, was constructed in the Modern Contemporary style, therefore, it was evaluated as an example of that style.
Modern Contemporary Architectural Style
Contemporary Architecture (ca. 1955-1965)
The San Diego Modernism Historic Context Statement gives the following information regarding the Contemporary design concepts. "---the Contemporary style was ubiquitous in San Diego during the 1950s and 1960s as a style for commercial buildings and streetscapes. These buildings display many of the same design features as Contemporary style homes, such as angular massing, varied materials use, and unusual roof forms, especially on free-standing commercial buildings. Sign age for street front commercial buildings in the Contemporary style was generally large, with bold free-standing letters attached to building facades that were frequently lighted in order to attract passing motorists. For Contemporary buildings with private parking lots such as grocery stores, signage was frequently taller and rose above the building itself, serving as a beacon in large parking areas." Contemporary design employed the latest styles and materials including such modern features as interior courtyards, aluminum framed windows, sliding-glass doors, angular massing, varied materials use, and unusual roof forms.
According to the Context Statement, the character-defining features of Contemporary style commercial buildings include the following Primary Features: strong roof forms including flat, gabled, shed, or butterfly, typically with deep overhangs; large windows, often aluminum framed; and non-traditional exterior finishes including vertical wood siding, concrete block, stucco, flagstone and mullion-free glass. The Secondary features of commercial buildings include: angular massing; sun shades, screens or shadow block accents; horizontally oriented State of California- The Resource Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION CONTINUATION SHEET Primary# ______HRI#______Trinomial ______Page 28 of 31 *Resource Name or# (Assigned by recorder) 1702 Camino Del Ri o North. Sa n Diego CA 92108 *Recorded by K.A. Crawford/ Office of Marie Burke Lia Date 12/2015 Continuation X Update buildings; distinctive triangular, parabolic or arched forms; eyebrow overhangs and integrated stylized signage.
This building originally included the main characteristics of a style, type, period or method of the Modern Contemporary architectural style under Criterion C. As originally designed, the building was an excellent example of Modern Contemporary architecture design and construction. The building then contained strong roof forms, including flat and folded plate styles, a colonnade as a deep overhang, non-traditional exterior finishes including concrete block, stucco, mullion-free windows and decorative panels, horizontal orienting and integrated, stylized signage.
However, the exterior alterations and additions have had a major and significant impact on the building's original architectural integrity. As documented Exterior Elevations and Addendum Memo included in Attachment E.1 to this Report, 29% of the East Fa~;ade is not original, 69% of the South Fa~;ade is not original, 64% of the West Fac;:ade is not original and 94% of the North Fac;:ade is not original. The storefronts are the dominant element of any department store as they present the store's accessibility and overall presence to the potential customer and the loss of the original storefronts represents an adverse impact that results in a significant loss of integrity. The integrity aspects of design, setting, feeling, workmanship, materials and association are not present, as discussed above, therefore, the property cannot meet Criterion C. Due to the fact that no indigenous materials went into the construction ofthe building, the building is not a valuable example of the use of indigenous materials or craftsmanship. Criterion D: Master Architect: Is representative of the able work of a master builder, designer, architect, engineer, landscape architect, interior designer, artist, or Modern Contemporary;
The subject property, located at 1702 Camino Del Rio North, San Diego, was designed c.1959 by architect Bill Lewis while he served as lead designer for A. C. Martin & Associates of Los Angeles. Mr. Lewis and his partner, Ward Deems, are listed in the San Diego Modernism Context Statement as "Contributing Designer[s] of Modern San Diego." In addition, the 1702 Camino Del Rio North building has been identified and attributed to Mr. Lewis within the San Diego Modernism Context Statement. These facts, notwithstanding, neither Lewis nor Deems have been recognized or established as "master" architects. In particular, neither individual is listed in the City of San Diego's Biographies of Established Masters {2011). State of California- The Resource Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION CONTINUATION SHEET Primary# ______HRI# ______Trinomial ______Page 29 of 31 *Resource Name or# (Assigned by recorder) 1702 Camino Del Rio North. San Diego CA 92108 *Recorded by K.A. Crawford/Office of Marie Burke lia Date 12/2015 Continuation X Update
An examination of Mr. Lewis' work over the years has resulted in the determination that he can be considered a figure of generally recognized greatness in the field of architecture. This is the definition of a master architect. Over the years, Mr. Lewis and his firms have received over 60 design awards, largely for commercial design work. Mr. Lewis has indicated that he and his firms were noted for the commercial, rather than the residential designs that were created.
With respect to the commercial design for the 1702 Camino Del Rio North building, Mr. Lewis has indicated that the structure represents a "notable" example of his work due to the fact that it was (1) designed early in his architectural career, and established him as a young, popular commercial architect, (2) it represented a new, successful model that changed commercial design work, which ultimately transformed the design of subsequent commercial development in San Diego, and (3) represented a new phase in the evolution of shopping center design. For these reasons, Mr. Lewis is eligible for master architect status, and the property once represented a notable example of Mr. Lewis' commercial work as a master architect. Therefore, had the property not been substantially altered, it would qualify under HRB Criterion D (Work of a Master).
After 1964, the 1702 Camino Del Rio North property was subject to a number of substantial modifications and alterations that have affected the original design/construction. These changes have had a major and significant impact on the building's original architectural integrity. As documented Exterior Elevations and Addendum Memo included in Attachment E.1 to this Report, 29% ofthe East Fa~ade is not original, 69% ofthe South Fa~ade is not original, 64% of the West Fa~ade is not original and 94% of the North Fa~ade is not original.
When originally designed, the 1702 Camino Del Rio North property appeared as a stand-alone department store, attached only on its west end to the rest of the shopping center. The north, east and south facades were in the public view from the freeway and other surrounding streets as the main attraction ofthe complex. In later years, the building was completely incorporated into the surrounding new Eclectic-style retail development to the north and the northeast. The building no longer reads as a stand-alone department store. It is now only a corner of a large retail complex, competing for attention with newer and different styled construction.
Eligibility under Criterion D requires that the resource "express a particular phase in the development of the master's career, an aspect of his/her work, or a particular idea or theme in State of California- The Resource Agency . DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION CONTINUATION SHEET Primary# ______HRI #.______Trinomia l, ______Page 30 of 31 *Resource Name or# (Assigned by recorder) 1702 Camino Del Rio North, San Diego CA92108 *Recorded by K.A. Crawford/Office of Marie Burke Lia Date 12/2015 Continuation X Update the craft." Further, 11Criterion D requires the resource to be representative of the notable work of the Master, as demonstrated in the nomination." 5 The extensive alterations to the building's exterior preclude it from meeting these eligibility requirements as the work of a Master Architect.
Criterion E. National or California Register Eligible: Is listed or determined eligible by the National Park Service for listing on the National Register of Historic Places or is listed or has been determined eligible by the State Historic Preservation Office for listing on the California Register of Historical Resources; The property has not been listed or determined eligible for either the National or California Registers.
Criterion F: Historic District: Is a finite group of resources related to one another in a clearly distinguishable way or is a geographically definable area or neighborhood. The commercial department store is not a finite group of resources.
Conclusion: The property is not eligible for the San Diego Historical Resources Register under any of the established criteria.
812. References
California Lot Book, Inc., Chain of Title for 1702 Camino Del Rio North, San Diego, California, March 2014.
California Room, San Diego Public Library, San Diego Union Tribune indexes and articles, other research materials.
City of San Diego, Building Permit files on file at Development Services Department.
City of San Diego, Guidelines for the Application of Historical Resources Board Designation Criteria, Land Development Manual, Historical Resources Guidelines, Appendix E, Part 2
City of San Diego, Historical Resources Research Report Guidelines and Requirements, Land Development Manual, Historical Resources Guidelines, Appendix E, Part 1.1.
5 Guidelines for the Application of Historical Resources Board Designation Criteria, page 28. State of California- The Resource Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION CONTINUATION SHEET Primary# ______HRI#______Trinomial.______Page 31 of 31 *Resource Name or# (Assigned by recorder) 1702 Camino Del Rio North. San Diego CA 92108 *Recorded by K.A. Crawford/Office of Marie Burke Ua Date 12/2015 Continuation X Update
City of San Diego, Water and Sewer Department Records.
City of San Diego, San Diego Historic Modernism Context Statement, pp 75-77.
City Works Architectural Firm, Exterior Elevations and Addendum Memo from closer review for May Company Store at Mission Valley Mall, 2015.
County Assessor's Office for parcel map, original subdivision map and Assessor's Building Record.
Google.com.
Hanson, Virgil Raymon, Mission Valley San Diego County California: A Study in Changing Land Use from 1769 to 1960. Geography Thesis. University of California, Los Angeles.
Historic Aerials, historicaerials.com, photographs of the subject property, 1953- 2013.
Modern San Diego. Com, "WilliamS. Lewis, Jr.", modernsandiego.com .
Moomjian, Scott A., Historical Resource Research Report For The Luigi G. Perna & Louise M . Perna House, 2320 Hickory Street, San Diego, California 92103, December 2011.
Moomjian, Scott A., Historical Resource Research Report For The 303 A Street Building, San Diego, California 92101, February 2013.
Moomjian, Scott A., Historical Resource Research Report For The 750 Camino De Rio North Buildings, San Diego, California 92108, Revised July 2012.
San Diego City Directories, 1959-1970.
San Diego Historical Society Research and Photographic Archives.
A.l - COUNTY ASSESSOR'S BUILDING RECORD
ATTACHED
r ; {C--· . ..., ... ,._.. ..• .. --. ;.:..-.,.to--;._ ~ . t ~ h . k ~\~ .l 1.. ..J .. J .... I ~J. ~L ~ ~ ...... J• "~ .... i:.._t,~.., .ri.rp~~ o-3~·.,.. c. Accocint No~ ~ ~:.._...:;-.. · : fi)·. Parcel No. _;65~f=_,....,...._,_ · · j ASSESSOR, SAN 'DIEGO COUNTY : .. · :._. .. . ,v:J.,~~.y- - ~ #dTff . . ·' I NAME ADDRESS rzz;, ....?~~~~~ ... ~~Ra SHEET OF ___k_
I Y.r-;;~ II I u-euoliiY t(" " I Bullr.hotad II Office Foe tory Bock Trim lobi>)' Warehouse Llo;hliflll l Hall LXI Drop Ceiling I Batn XI Dl.a.Piotlorm ll ~eotrOC>II>IJt:: nL.e 16 lr._..;....,..,.. I~ IA'-='-7i ~ f) uuality SPECII.L FEA lURES CONSTRUCTION RECORD NORMAL% GOOD RATING (E,G.A,F,PJ ITEM___L_Wl,·cAPAciTY 1 MATERIAL oR TYPe OVAL EFFEC. APPR. il Permit Ram. Table Amount Duta YEAR YEAR Avo Life % No. For -' A ,...,..~,._, Di:-r>r s;;,-2<:: ~~~m l!l~-..:."7 Jf'& I /9(11' t; (,.r ~.s- ~~ cr I a 1& I A- I A"..- II __!~ ...... c~.... r~tl R.,..."'.,.· / .4 ">-1.. 17 .Con.. _.Of! J.~. ::..,..~ ~/,.('h,. I 'fi, 1-.J 3 "'"2- oiHS 'i9 A .3,.-9~. A e... It!.... &"I ... /~~/ j7£'1 .; :;-~ ~.d'£n 7F A- - .2>:u~ I '2 f:u~e~.JJ.'a""~;;:~ fi-.Je. wh...h~:. /'?{..; ·' . H77_ II. 3'( {j It.{() SJ. .A: /OS! -'-f ,..-v:r: """reA. 3~~~ 9-2¥-?• I Uoo«s A':.I.:>"-2P7 ,, ,... /Y -;z.s-~zv G,J -q_ .c.-- j File$ ,--,.,...o- ..:;:i. A:"-t:c.r7r h ,_z:I::_~ · --- -~Eievato~ [Z;,;!.P?;;l -n>~ Ill ~# # .1'! #"'}' , 4\ .OJ;>~=> I t. J -~ ~~J!f?::tZ Appraiser on Uote ''~U'C:U"-_ ~.,.,. WaJ~ Il-19·1.3 ?--?-_£2 • ~:.~-::JAZ\IUo.'- 'VB/81., . , AREA/ UNIT • UNIT r -a; ~s.>'> "- I II I II l a:·?.~r= I ]~ :: ; .. ' · - · - - .r~~ 9~"'0 c; /&L1'7&> M:>O~-v..ttu~~ II II 9931 . e.r· ..5'"~/1$""~ Nn~9¥M't~71t o-- 'J...>"' o• " Y•• - /--...... I ,, .. !' .. .. i : ·j STRUCTURE ! FOUND J F~OOlfrcoNST.I EXT ••. , •. ROOF • . • • -<. .:..-.J ., DIM; I'AREK/UNI' ___ ...... ~d;-'T - /~.-1~-b-!.·- ~ 4 • ' • • • t 1"-'~r~ra..ru,z /?/J.n.-rJ rF{)AJ J tli.J r}.lts /J,/Ii2- -~ -;~r ~; -..:: ! ; ... ~=r; ;f ·· -· I 1··· 1·· ]···-c "I · ~:j. ·I· 8srnr ..;_~t'o Q 11 ' , ' .· / ..s!;FL tf.l 'ot!JO '"'.-~ <...... r ~ ' I J.w.!J ,::!;[. ~I .:.oo f . " ' _· ] i i ·I 1 1 -r--l __l_ .. ' -.:iA4f-t 3 _ :/t:JD~ ~ ""' :- r ~ nri4-L !6-S. ooo "' -'. : - l! _i COMPUTATIONS 1.. '-I Pez.~ - i-r.$ "" , ' ~ I • I 'N, A-"'13 ?>o/. ' a;#(a.. : ·1-Z..'I-;Sl.#. " r - \. - ! I • 1!1-'~"1 4117 ~C,ez;,. 3~4 -8<- 1 ~ I .. I A.St41--J '-(.4-;.J\ei._:. '3{3iJj'8j_ ·:· t-' r . +~ _.. -;) ------.. . :! . . ' l . •. ..· J -5P1.A~I'5'f c~et, · 1/JII!'fl : I I j • ( " • -s- ~ :--"~ • I .... _ r· - ' T' I -\" ··-·"-+- J, [· · .. ..! •," . ,.I - .I ~ ., ! I' ~ I i '• : ' ,. I• • ,• ------·,· • •.1 . .. -....- - -.! • • )...... :! .;! ______. t __,I ' ~ ' __ I 4 ' -· • I -r .... ":'1 "'" .,. "" j - -· r- '. l I : ... . J 'i .. t ' I : : • I i ' - r 1 . • ..... :...... ~. .. ,--,· - - ~- .. .. ~• • -: -~~ . -T" "T -1 REMARKS; '?;v,.; 7iz;w. @~ ~-j ~B(et:?.Y> 7p I , I J#J##,_ q ~VL?1JU6 /R~$;U~6'~~ 7;;_.-;V<>'~~_L_, I 1 ~; ,UVY-!Tt:r..P 0 /~""' D'' Vhuc ~e.;(" 4,r:r ff# /,J,J.-!".r.t-= i /z,-"""''~:'%. -~.$ r @ ,.rft~..(~~~ # ·-,.- • ~.:!" I. I . ' \ . @z~ /'~.-r-4' <"?&! &C dLY"<"'<) «,., C~<(€ C ...... - . ...-=;;P-ZS: ·:- .. . ( ·--·-r··· - . ~ ,... t---- ~:l 1 rG!2/.-vP:-<~-1' f&:.- .1....:.... I · -- • • • ~ ~j ------r----,_ ~ ., ~ 'I ~ ~c;~.,q~.1~GO_. 70-CALIFOftN•A IWI~C.:~LLAIV£Vt.J::t ~cJILDIN& ttEc,;OttD SHEET roF...1::_ sHcirs ~P~RccL ,.J·. J ~r" :. ~ ~. · .,. ! :~- dAYa,· ADtJRcss ;;'n.. 6 .n1.-u" Pee,. !8a , ~ ~ OESCRIPTION OF BUILDINGS Roof Bldg. 2¥Sirw, ~ .. r" £fk~ Structur• Slu Found. Wall a E111~riQr Floor a Interior Detail TdJ No. Typ~ Cov~r Or L.,I'J. B«1ll y•• ,. . / LZ. ·~ ~ ..,~ . /f(/ 11/./ ~~J 2 ,-4,...._.~ t'Pu~"" fr&/ Jft/ ..lf'&,J /-'~11-r ~ Al.t!f~JffPdl! .. '/f't/ lftl "Ji'f.,J 4:'· I?L".. /V,/ ~~ . !9/./ \ $') ?ff~. ,4~ .c~ '--.- \ . { ~. ./_ ,,.; ~ ~ ~ ~~~. . " ( 1( . A, ;£,;q;z;;,~~ ~ A.L.-1~, 57~1# ~ lfc, t>J~ t . .. C- COMPUTATION IJiJJ ~ 1 <:!__-- ~ .,..~~ -z;., Approls~r- Dattt .lf1c... .1'~N'd·r- -.£.v ,.... ~ ~ I"'Rei\! 'v-1 ~.\ e. 11-18·43 ~'':~-----...:. ' ~""""- ~ -7-~7 (-?3 Bldg. - .No. Ar~a g~ltosl Cost G~d ~:».~ ~~~~ Cost IG!od ~·£- ~- ~~!~ Cost I Gr~ r-f:~: ~~!~ Cost I G~d 1·~:~ (/_) /?~-p&J ./Y ~33tl no 3.))0 .IS '33l!.o f'~ .a -'-97 I 3 ~,..,.... . ~ /';a.) /.?¥'aJ.~ 1.6~ .3~/~ 1.'~0 :,,._ '!!" .3~7'1 :r?> of'J~ .::f~ Y..J..-. b".H.) eft:r 1 ..2...t1T /'J) /o~9o . 5o l,n,"'' .S"'O n.Jtfi -~1~i) --=; 23oo q~ 7 (-f) G> {{~. J.::J.o'a l/nJ ?;_, ·q; (.£)_ YF. ;;t:;~ (J jkJ 39(,0 - ~ 'f'-1!> .3-r1io fp} G. -.M~ "'': 1t'oo /;/od /-teo 91i 732 (;12_ F;bY .9l) 73 97 7~17 -~ '73S'7 41/ 1.3/L I ' %)>A -v~. .) /().:. ¥' Total ~ ). 7t)q!-/ . 2'7(. .3 .J. ~~7'£...~ NO__.. -'-7td~ . v- Approis•r-Oattl ~ · dll- ..' ~ ~ B!~g. f.!_nit · % '!.nit Cost ~~-z-~· g_nlt Cost Co~t No. A reo Cost Coat Good ~·~~: Cost G.ood o.st ;;ad f:~·[ g:!~ r,r~~ ~·~. 'fi. " ; I j I . I . . Total - A-t~ e-~e A.2 - NOTICE OF COMPLETION NONE FOUND A.3 - MATER/SEWER RECORDS ATTACHED SEWER !l(l.rE UIS.P£C.'fi!:O REtiUI'T NtMtEII! COHN£C:TIOH S/ ~£~RD N9A ~ IJS£1(tNB£R I.£ SEitYICE fA.P.$ UA.IN: t!'" . ~~A•' !Cii: ENTUi8 i'A<:>P£f~T'Y: Fr . ~ FRO+! ;MDM - - ·- - I.OfiAT ION oF C'I.£AN ·•t.ICT I>AH. I~ST .. L~£0 rDRI!:MAN , tl, PRr.A'ERlY Ullt I I 'f ',i.. ~- E--i "'-'· ~ .• t;.. D£P fll ~ SEllER CAUI;.X lNG 0 CEMENT I MATERIAL 0 \fiT. CLAY ,t.T COtAPUUHD C:. TEWI. tNSIDE 0 !ioiL PIPi loU."' IN PROf'. I ~SU> -;;:: ~e.ILQ I P.R0P£R1Y £] FOII:Iol IS7a STOP-UP RECORD ON REVERSE ' SEWER ~...... lN!iP~C:ll'.O IRE~I'.IH MUMfl~fi; CONNECTION NC? A .:! rlt ' A RECORD ':i '{j _. ..,. ; ~ 2aQ-) HCIU~£. NlJ!,IBE'II STIIEF:T - -- .-·Ul'r/aLOC.l-.lllliTIDti (LEGAL Of;&CRIPTIO!il 1702 C.llf DO Del Rio 4 IU.ald.OD Y.U., :l'I\'NE..-_. • ' - · - ~-- - ~ ...-rn' Miv Dep. Mon. eo. rYPF. oF ca~~C1Jr.N ll0Cl);/P.-~t 'vERP'Ilt llY ,-:OTAL 7,0 PC I ~~ ...r-c~ .T.V. 9 Ri,CF I P 1 ___~'sf______JI SP~(;Io!.l !NS~IJOI.:~ ' "~~ - t ( 7 •c_,.-\ It I ..... <:"'.•~' • \~ ~~ •· ...... >,.o. • 5fR~I~f T~f5 MAIN! n s:t.Joi'•l C.t. :!:tft:'f ;.·s rR-:.Jt<"~ERTY: i"T I"R!Eol > P.OI.l - - - (.>r ------L\K. ~TI0Pl CLF.~PI-OLf tlAH li'ISTALL£(1 fT . PROPERTY Lli'l< ~ O~FTH 0~ S!•~H ~; ·lNG IIIITERIAl ~D~U. I~IM 1· 1 ~1 ~~ l N ~MCP . I,IS£P P~Of'EfiTl' ~ 7 F'vilr~ 1~n STOP-UP RECORO ON RE1.VER$E• J, I I A. 4 - BUILDING PEmfiT RECORDS ATTACHED May 1975 #K34192 Internal walls October 1975 #KS7220 Remodel snack bar October 1975 ##K57454 Interior Drywall January 1976 #K66575 Drywall First floor June 1976 #K89844 Block fence trash area October 1976 #LOSS Drywall partitions October 1976 #L093 Drywall partitions November 1976 #L11543 Drywall basement June 1981 #512980 Install fire stairs January 1986 #A43307 Stock room addition December 1986 #PS4639 Tenant improvements March 1987 #AS5921 Tenant improvements and retaining wall February 1991 #8000154 Tenant improvements candy department April1998 #8200595 Tenant improvements September 2001 #8203937 Telecommunications facility March 2013 ? Installation of 8' panel antennas 2 - TEL. NO. 3 NUMIEROfl DWELLING UNITS PRIVATE DISPOSAL APPROVAL THiS PERMIT THIS PERMIT DOES NOT BECOME VALl AUTHORIZES UNiiL SIGNED BY THE DlliECT .Jr< . ONLY' THE BUILDING INSPEC""ION, OR HIS DEPUTY;·. WORK NOT~D AND t=.EES ARE P.',\0, AND RECEIPT IS ACKNOWLEDGED IN SPACE PROVIDED. !NG;!'>EC"riON I>EE'ARTMENT , \\ l ~ ·< • Dar•: --~-"~\...\--'. ~_,(_)_.\t--\t.._-=iQ '------· -. __ INSP!:;CTOR' I hereby Dcknowfadce appllc:~:~tlon; thar the lhfOC"motiOtt given Is corr~tdi nnd that I :~rr. :I)WnGr, or thi; duly .OL•- THIS PERMIT THIS PERMIT DOES NOT S£COME VAI.fD tflorb:od 11,9on~ of tno own;~r. I •greco to comply whh ~.:I>)' .:md stale lllWS AU'l"tiORIZilS rogui11Hnq corutrw;:tlot~; ddfng tho wor~ ;n~thc;rfx<:d thereby, no UNTIL SIGNED BY THE OIRECroR OF por"...on will af the U!bor COria of the State of 01'-lLYTHE BUILDING INSPECTION. OR HIS DEPUTY; Ceflfurn/4 fllSUI'Ilt'ICf,.'l. WOII;K NCrr:;t) AND FEES ARE PAID, AND RECEIPT IS ·. ACKNOWl.EDGliD IN SPACE PROVIOfD. oat~: .. 1{(10~---· INSPECTOR ~ -· \. :....:..______J______. J-.5~~;,~~~-IJ~~~~=-i~~~~ YES I ~__;__;__,,.:...;.;.__ ..:.,;_ _ __:__•, IMPROVED NO I OCCUPANCY~OUP ~=-- r ~c...;B;::_ C D ~'1:_ G H l J~ PLAN CHECK ~~~~~~--~~~~~---~~~;~~~~~~~-~ ~~= £- ' ~~~--~~~£---~~~~~~R~EC=E~i~P·~r~N~O~·------ STATEMENT OF PROPOSED \JSF. IJ r ' _ -:- J__{!g~ .)'~0 l hereby acknowledga lh;H I have ro;~.:J lhl~ applicatlc•n : rh.>r tho! THfS P£1tMii THIS I'ERMtT DOES NOT Information given Is correct; ard thot r am thu ownor, or rh .,_ d~tly AUTHORIZES aurhorh:11d agent of the owner. I a~ ree 10 cnouJly wtrn cir·,t and :;r,;re UNTIL SIGNED iY THE Iavis ragu l at!n~ construc tion; and In doing the work authorr;r;ed th e r~ Ot-tlY THE BUILDING INSPECTION, OR HIS by. no eerson IYIIJ be >!mployed In violotlor, of the lnbor C:ocf,~ f the WORK NOTED State of Calliornla relating 10 Workmen's CornpcnsatTon lns~• r<~liC P . AND FEES ARE PAID, AN!> ACKNOWLEDGED IN SPACE PROVIDED. S1GNA TURE OF INSPECTION OWNER or AGENT______-··- DEP"-RfMENT ··' ADDRESS__ . • By: __-...c c ~~--·-· ·----- Da1e: ~ ;'/;_~ i~ t. _.-'f- • 7 I ' - 1 EVIDENCE Of A.GENCY NOTED______...:.fi' 3,_------·------: PLOT !'LAN CIIECK & APPROVED------. _ _ ~ _ _ lNSPECTOi ~~ HEALTH DEPT. APPROVAL ______- ---- CITY Of" SAN O:EGO '.l, MAP NO. ECONOMIC LOCATION CENSUS EA. LBD. TAX TRACT LOT VARIANQNO AREA PERMIT NUMBER ST. GRADE CH£CK CLEARANCE CH£CKED BY: EXISTING 0 CENTER LINE 0 OTHER. OF PROPERTY VERifiED BY DEMOUSti 0 MO'IE 0 APPLICATION APPROVAL ac:knowfedge that I have read this applfe11tion; :hat the . giYUT\ Is' O!To<:t; and th t I em thu ow 01 , ., rht< duly .tu- THIS i'F.RMIT THIS PERMIT DOi:S NOT BECOME VAt ~gent of tho owner. I l:lQl'eo to comply wi'll'> city and ~l'llte lilw~ AUnfOR.IZES no c;qnstrucfl on; ;mcf ln de>lng the work authoti:tod ;hell!by, no UNTIL SIGNED BY THE DIRECTOR I persor1 will be omp!_;y'll'd In vJDIIltlon of !ht.! t.«bor Code •A thl: St,ll:..~ of ONLY THE 6UILDING INSPECTION, OR HIS DEPUT C~llfomlor relating to Workme.n's Cclmpens-11tfan lnsuranc..,. WORK NOTED AND FEES ARE PAID, AND RECEIPT SIGNATURE OF ACKNOWLEDGED IN SPACE PROVIDE >4 _/I II ,/ ·~-- J OWNER or AGENT~e ft_. ift.. /). 1/:1 ( !J' INSPECTION ----, I OSP..-,RTMt;:NT ADDRESS _!_t.f..:Z..t_,.c..'/u...._._. __,...... ~-= D~te; /Z. h . ~ Lt:;j_ .. _._·- · INSPECTOR CJl"""'f OF •SAN p§EGO REAR - Y.AAO TEL NO. J VAOJ.fT' Y~ 1D"' SITE NO 0 TEL NO. -· CLEARANCE -J- CHECKED- P.Y: EXISTING 0 CENTER LINE 0 OTHER OF PROPF.RTY •• VERIFIED BY w:J~=~· E/J~ ~ F~-~-J~, _..._· . .._. N~ 0 DEMOLISH 0 ADD 0 MOVE 0 AESIOENTIA.L 0 NUMBEit Of ''NON-ti.SIOr:NTIAL 0 STORIES DWELLING UNITS COUNTY~!TAT~IO~N~D~IS~~~R~IC~T~~~~~~~.~~~~~--~~~~~~~---~------~ ------~ -~------RECEII'T NO. I J.. ¢. APPLICATION APPROVAL aoknowlcdge that I havo tend this applleatior.; thilt tho I!' correct; and 1hat I am the owner, or \he duly au THIS PERMIT of tke owner. 1 agn!e ro comply with city :snd raot" laWii THIS PERMIT DOES NOT BECOME VALl ...... , .. ,",.,.." constructron; and In doing the woO. ;u.Jthorl:t ADDR~S ______ I:.VWENCE Of AGENCY No·re-n P!.OT P!.AN CHECk 8- ·"'-~"PROVEr:_;·~=---- . ~ ~~- ~-'~ - H6/\.:..TH i:>EPT. i·.f'Jl~OVAL ______.__. ·--- . ·- • • INSPECTOR ~ J1t ECONOMIC LOCATION I ----I~~~--~L=B~D~. ---T~AX~~~~~------l LOT AAEA PEfW.lT NUMBER CLEARANCE EXlSfiNG 0 _ _2 .. _:_ .3_ SPECiAL INSPECTOR REQ'D. PLAN CHECKED SY WORK TO BE DONE /N:STII~J..ArtiiN'. t:J,: -,41/J'TQ 4/Al"'IG. .;:'I.e£ .SPArJJI.I!UAr.S. NeWJrJ ALTER 0 O€MOLISH 0 AODO REPAIR 0 MOVE Q JI.ESIDENTIAl. 0 NUM!>ER 01' NUMRER.OF NOI-HESIDENTIJ',L 0 STORIES !)WELLING UNfiS COUNTY SANITATION OISTnlCT Pll.IVATE OISPO~!.. APPROVAl. RECEIPT NO. 1 her4by ucknowlll<.I\J o') thn~ I have ro11t1 this nppllc'ation; that· t!w hlfurml\tlllrt given l!i ;;orract; 11nd tn<:t I dnt th ~ 1wnoar, or tha duly •1'1- iHlS Pi Ev :DEI\J Ci~ OF AGEN<::Y f.!OTED ______--·~...,;.~- P LOT FU•. N CH£Cl:. &. A P?;:I_OVED ~-t~/'\l "f\~i DEPT . •-A. F~RC·Vr~.t. .. ~T?iU;r"01 ';;a-~• NI! ,..,...,.,..,._~~ ... , ~ ~"""--. ·- __ L;~~~It~·-----·---· -·~· -~ - j--' '•.~~ I • _ , "" • T ~ ~~ · · ~:~.. ilt-'"'-'· ·~ -...... - ... ~, . ..--:r~ ... ---·~,·~~ ·- .~L.,. .... ,_ ,·-··-···-L TC:I .. ;' H.'). NEW liJ iJGA.·t.'1LlS.H MOVE ,.., ADD [J o, J ~ ' S ~;g~TOrP~L Rl'i~ll~l'i NftAt-.- o-~IJJ'j\RF.:R ~ -·-· ·- ~hS lif'. ~~ f . OF 2-- -~~ S PLUS t..(()l'-l•RC,£1 D£1o~:~~ 0 1 Sl'o~:..~~ ______L?W~l.UN? ll/'.!~1"$ I C.OUI-l'r"Y 5.A.~;r.1 iOH f.HS7kt<:T ?~.I"-' .-~1'E Dl~PC5/'. t... .. ·._r. ·I·,RO'·"'·A: l- ?~Y~~~.:a:_ -~~- - ~'g'· · ~~ECEtP'f NO. . :..· N"\O!.JNT 0\Ji: .. l._+_:U~. ~STATEMi;NT------Of------~-- PRO'f'OS.ED USr: I h.ar~b'; ;;dmowh;ds;~a ~hat . have Elad ~his applir:a~i-:n; e-.;;t ' "~ 1!5innt1a ·~~C)!'J ivet\ :5- cvrrf!!c t; Qnd thut 1 nm the GW~er~ or- the dt...!v 3Ll .. YN!S NiRMrr " ..: .. fHI5 PERMIT DOE5 NOT SECDMS VAUD thorized nget\t o~ (h& ownat. I <~;J'' "" r.,. r.<1moly .,,; •·i. :: ll ~ H -~ ~- ' '"'·''~ .<~ l ;NSPECTOR c,...... •:"lilt f *-~-N r;~FJ.: .. TEL NO. . ~ .. : THIS PERMIT =-:.:, .. UTHORIZI:S THJS PElMIT DOES NOT JECOME ONLY THE UNTIL SIGNED BY THE l>fREC1'0l BUILDING INSPECTI9N. OR H~S D ~~O T-r/~, WORK NOTE~ AND FEES AlE !tAID, AND RE lliiEIPEC'l'ION ;'• .) DEPARTMENT AC«:~- IH;:/1~ ' By -) ~ Date : _2~>~ - . INSPECTOR ! rii. r-~o. I ..~ . CllY ...::), STATE LICE ~ISE I TRACT WORK TO BE DON£ A" r'O ALTER D DEMOLmH REP .... IR. D MOVE ·'· PRIVATE. OlSPOSA!. APPROVAL APPLICATION APPROVAL IIC KI'nwlodgo I hnva relld lnl!' application; that the :tni'orrnatlo>l !JI ··t:-n Is uorrecl; and thot I am tf•o owner, cr t he dllly nu- THIS PERMIT .: age•lt cf the ownor. I ugrue to comply with <:fly anC. s:atE> laws TriiS PERMIT DOES NOT BECOME VALl tlng construction; nnd In doing the work uthorlzed therabv, no AUTHORIZES UNTIL SIGNED BY THE DIRECTOR C ~rson will bet employed in vlcl.:~tlon of the LDbor Codo of the Stato of ONlY THE BUILDING INSPECTION, OR. HIS OEPUT' WORK NOTED California relating ro CornpnnsytJi AND FEES ARE PAID, AND RECEIPT L? ACK!'-IOWLEDGED IN SPACE PROVIDE! f .J lNSP!!:;:rtlON OEPAI'«MENT ADDRESS jt;rzs- b'T~ · ·' ·.c!• r~y : ~~4 EVIDENCE OF AGENCY NOTED ~ ! ' . Ddle: ~t/4;/ PLOT PLAN CHECK & APPROVED ____, ~~::;.:E=-- .. HEALTH DEPT. APPROVAl ---- • INSPECTOR • ' • j ! ' . • ,. ~ r -=- t_ • .. ,· . 4 . - . . . -. . ' AMOUNY DUE ..... ATTENTfON: ' ~; I horeb)' oclt.)\uwl•dge lhdt 11hova rood thl• a r-;ollc:allon ; 1hat tho fHI!i PHMIT :£! lnfarmo!lon given l ~ "orre.ttr ond tho! l <:rn ewna;, or th" duly uuth · ... THIS !'ElMIY OOK NOf HCOMII' VAUD UNfiL ,1,.,. AUTHOIUZES ,._ otl:.d agent of tho owl>()r, I 11oreo to com(lly with city ond tl f "4, · "'t < ~~ "' )'lAi'•·C!-tEO: ....:..F :::~E:______~ • ..,.,. .. : '\.;., ~ ~:_: . ~ : A?PUCATION Al'P'ROVA - ".. ~i' ...- . n·3f5 i'Eil"i!f .O~)il} tt ;Qr ~..:.. :>f'"'E ';!Al.!D J:iN . .I • ,' 5!Gi" , /·t~~\/·:.~t ,/.~..'.... ·~: ./ ~: i ;""+~ :. \ 1 ..:.··""' J '~ . :: ·' . 1- .i~l'iti')N ,· ~Is i'eR<.IIf AlJY~ORilES ot-nv nu;, EX IS liNG t.JSE Of 8UftOING OR I"ROPERTY COI"·!C.Rtn::. 0 M.<\SONPI¥ , 0 WELOil'iC, rl S I het •bv acknowludn" lnol I hov,. re<1d lhl• o ppl; APPliCATION A~UOIIAL TillS I'UMif OO&S NOT UCOMl' V#,ll) UNTil i iGNlO ftV Ill£ DIMfCIQR O' e\lrU>INO IN$J'(C:. liCIN. Ol Ill~ OE,UIY, liND FU$ AU PAlO. AND .tlCEIPI IS ACKI\I0WI[OQ6D IN S,•ACf r•OViO&D. WElDING. H.S'· PILE ORIVING O!HF.R iiOE'NTIFyt AfrENTION IHISPOMIT A\.ftf!O!IIZ!S ONlY1HE WOII(( NOJEO CONCRETE. MASONRY WELDING, H.S. BOLTS PILE 0111\'ING OThER IIDE.Nl!FY\ AnENTION THIS PERMIT , AIJTHO!IiZES , ON<'flH£ WORK NOTE!) .·.:- ... S~WEII FEE WAlE!! FEE STATE FEE SPECI""l INSt>ftTION REQUiRED FOR. 0 CONCREII': 0 MASONRY. 0 W;;LOIN\3, H.S. SOLIS [] Pll,:: ORIV.ING 0 OTHER (IOENliF·YJ AnENT!ON THIS I'EiMIT AUlHOII:ZI!S ONl'l'lHE WO.I( NOT£D ~:.: ~~~~~~~~~..L.---::;:~----~:--:-;;---I-;sP~E~C:IA~l~IINSPECfiON RfQUI~ED FOR 0 CONCREtE 0 MASONRY 0 WELDING. H 5. 0 PILE DI!IVING 0 OTHER !IDENTIFY~ AnENT10N THISPUMif AUTHOIIZES ONlYlHE WOIK NOTED o::: 06 2th3=r} .-.i., ...... ,.,.4- ' -t·· SPECIAL INSPEC i\01',4 P.EQUIRErJ FOR 0 CONCRETE 0 MASONRY 0 WELDING , ~ 5 D Pllf..DRIVIN(; 0 Olliff< iiCENiiFY) AnENTION THIS PIORMIT AUTHORI<::ES ONLY THE WORK NOT!O;:) BU LCING INSPECTION Al'l'liCATION AI'P'.OVAL THIS PUMIT DOES NOT UCOMJ. VAliD UNTIL SIGN~D l'f THl DIHCJO. OF IUIIDING INSIIIC· TJON, a• HIS DE'UTY, "'NO 'fiS ARE '"'"'· IIINP •tCfl~: IS AC~NOWLEDG.EO lN SPACE UOVIOIED . t11.1 0 :c :; < h~-~~~~~~~)~~~~~~~------JL-J ~ INSPECTO. AlTENnON \'HIS PIIMIT AUUCO.IlES CMYTHE WOIIIt NOliO SPECIAl •i'JSPE CliGN RfOU•RED FOil 0 CONCRI:IE 0 MASONRY n w<.LOtNG, 11r.. amrs 0 ?tlf OR IIftNG ~ 0 OTHER IIOENlfFYl ~ Ul ATTENTION THIS PERMIT AL.iTHOil iZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED BUILDING SEWER FEE WAtER FEE PARK FEE SPECIAL INSPECTION Rf.OUIIIED FOR 0 CONCRETE 0 MASON~Y 0 WELDING. H S [] ~ILE DRIVING 0 OfHER IIDENT!f\li ATTENTION TH!S PERMI T AUTfiORIZ F. S ONLY THE WORK N OTED BUILDING INSPECTION J.PPliCAliON 4PrtOVAL H~l$ fH,...II D~~S NOT I£COMl 11AIID UNTil SIGNED tN THt ~~-~ ·~ro~ Of IIJI:DING INS,Er. I'ION o• til~ OEPIII~ . ANI) FtES ·-~ 'A.IO. ANCI ~f~~lPl 15 4Cki'IOW\.EDGEO IN SP~Cf ,.OYIDE~ I (18 (16 2002 I SEWER FEE Wo\IER FEE PARK FEE MASONRY WElDING, H S PILE DRIVING OIHER (1DENIIFYr . AT11111noN ~.· !i%li.:::;::---.L:~--=:_....:...=-I· TltiSI'UioUT ... A>ll'HOIIIZES ONLY 1!i£ I"OIIk NOTED lUI !DING - ' INSI'IC~ION IIIIS ,tiWII DO£$ NOJ UCOIIIII;, ¥AlG llNIII. 51GNm n TH l Olllefo•'DI WkbU•~ ...... C. ____J L___ IIQ'f, Ol HIS D(I'I.IIY• liNG rflj; .Ut lfAJD. 'aHO ~~~~L_ ~~ tiiCIII'I II ACU/QWtfDOfO ~ tHCC NOV.Iil. ' CITY Of' SANOI~GO 08 ~)6 20(12 SEWEll F~~ WATER ~EE 73423 SPECIAliNSPfCTION REQUIRED FOR 0 CONCRETE 0 MASONRY 0 WElDING. H.S. BOLlS 0 PILE DRIVING Q OIHER UDcNTIFY) AmNRON . THIS l'f~YIT AU1HDIIIZ£S ONLY THE :l:o lfDIIK ,.CUD ..,- 1~~ ... 1:11 ·. lliii.OING ··-~"':} IU II'f(!T!ON OlPA~'!Mo:NI" - ~ ! }.') '.~ ' - CIIY Of' SAN OtEGO - --~·· '· (o - ,;l.' - USPECTOR WATER FeE PARK F~F. SPECIAl INSPECIION REQUIRED f'OR =-'"------· 0 CONCRETE 0 MASONRY 0 WElDING. H 5 0 PILE OAIV.ING 0 OTHER (IDENIIFY; AnENTION THIS' PERMIT AUTRORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED BUILDING INSPECTOR - .. ~ SEWE~ FEE WAlE~ FEE PAI'!K FEE SPECIAL INSPECTION REOUIR!:D FOR 0 CONC"REIE 0 ~l;loSQNRV 0 'r/ELDING. H; 0 ,liLE DRIVING :J OT~IER !IDENliFYI AniNTION THIS i'ERMIT AUtHORIZES 0'J\.Y lH~ WDIIK NOT£0 8UilDINC INsrt:CTION ~~~~L------~------L------4~ CIV'IOF SAN Di£130 1 SEINEa FEE WAl ER FEE PARK fEE SPECIAliNSPECllON REOUIRm FOR 0 CONCRETE 0 MASONR\' 0 WELOINC. H S ~ml~ 0 PilE OR\VING 0 0 O!HEI\ l\ OEM IIFY I ~ ATTENYION THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED BUILDING (.II SAN Dlf.GO C:....• c•ry 01 t.oOnlv •rucn rtoqt)lreio Jl OIIH'nfl juu t ~• - ••ao'.cl "'ft •l"~ Jb()hc.utl to IM P'0Vr£to,s of 1"-e C<'lnl~: or f "l'.:. ~~~~~.• ~;~;:;~~~o~ thot'8nt • nt~S.t ,,..rsPtolftS.l~D.,, Coor• " t10I mo~~~~:!~.':~~~~~~~?~~~~ ~~~."{ -'fi~C0"1"1_p(f'lUt•or: .,,uaoJI'le • .,.u -. ana Bu.smn1. &f'IO PiOfft.)IOnS C~! 'fn• tllfltO Dv•irt5. ~~ oMU/0114": fttGU~ p,- •• ... ~,. ..,eo ' 4~ ~ - .a,.. .. e-, \ .... a~~c .,r:_.z • .· . .. ·.. ·. ·. FitE --·. - . . ·ft;-. . q . ,; .. :-:: --;- · CITY TREASURER VALIDATIOr; DATE: ~ ~L------...... •; Ho l< ~llllll , , O H~~'J II'IW OT.N OEPun ··:,- . ,., "5 7 L '· f ' ------(1:3 (16 2002 *''* GRID E0 4 OM< E04 •* ~ BEPOBT Y4] · 920·0l 8PIS PURr.EO RE CORDS AS OF 01/14/?I PAGE • 43.ill_ ADDRESS: 001702 CA" DEL RIO NORTH CO"": APH: 438 030 06 00 PLAN FILE: A010\14S \tO --wp!FoR~Hnrr~N~o~:~emuMU~o~1s~4~9~1---•s~t•Rurrc"'r~:~o~o1r--~s ~TA~t~ar.$7: '~~uE~o~:~o~1~t~6~9~1-~E~x~PfT.R~£~s~,-oms~1~9~9~,~~,~rN~A~L~E~v~:~o~t~?o'~9~1--~Pu~R~GT£o".~-~a~,~,,~~~, ToyJr-- (SVl COMMENTS: 15000 VALUE PER CQNTR. Bt CODE: 431i0 ilc DESC: ADD/AU 1"£1l6/IT 1HP~QH:i£t1 TS (Pil DESC Of WORK: TENANT IMPROVEMENT FOR ADDlTlON OF CANDY DEPARTMENT. ($V) CODE qUANr lT Y USE/TYP E OF CONSTRUCTION RATE UNIT VALUE X02 OTHER - CONT RAC T08S VALUATION IS OOO.OO fA 150011 Y40SV ======STRUCTURE INFOR~ATIO~ ===== 2 ======~======~====~======~======lor: IIDDELIDESC: 1 1 APII ·: ~ 38 o:lo 06 Oo rYPE or tl'NSTR: YN occ GROUP; sz _ _,_O .Ii.E~DR!!.:O!!.!Oclll.olS~·~>~S~TU~t;D!!.I!JOt_;:;__.!I.O_.l.lJ..l ~OL-.!02.;.: .....J01l-..olu:_!J.Q.....J4~;._..!1Q'--01L...i..--l!O---'Sl..!Tw.O~R.A.l.I.E~S.._; _.z.______..JJI PI:!-'SuP:....o.C J'!A.J.!.i.:.J..-....uSO I L : U ill l 9A 0 • 110 CHii PERMITTED·> UNITS: 0 fl~ AREA: 0 BLDG AREA: 0 &HARGEA8LE: 0 PLAN CHECK fEE: 105.30 TOTAL·····> UNITS: 0 FLA AREA: BLDG AREA: VALUATIO~-~ INIT: 1fb00 FIHAL: 15000 PLAN FILE: A010945 90 SUBMITiED: 12 14 90 OTC: N STATUS: A CONTRAC TOR lNFO : 11~11£": PQU(SOII, RON ASSOCIATE'S III C PIIOIIE: 818 1!64 JIH6 OIINER-9 1/lLOE·R FLAG: H LIC ENSE: 4291r4 CLS: A·l ~ORK E R "D CONP • !~S: E~P!RES: ~a~r~c~'------P~O~l~luC~r~:------~E~K~P~!R~E~S~:------ J IISPECHON TYPE SCIIED OEO CO"P\. TtiT ~ OTH RE>IARliS ----~l*0-;fr,IN~A~l~~~~~0~?~9~1~P~If~F~0~2~2~09~JI--~SX~N~P~--~PuE~/I ~p.~fl~E~C~------ JO INfFR lOR IIALL c ona9 J Iilio ofH91 s~:· p 30 SUSPE~O ED CEIL I 01.3?1 V~ G G12391 S~N P 1 ,OQ 1\CCESS INSP ECTI O" fEE 8,10 41300 73427 8.10 AC03 --~~~.O~O~Dr.Y~I l~U~~G~PE~PH~IhiMFE~E~------~'~--. • .• ~ li~~, z~----~~6~a~·.s~0~9~0o~I------.Oo ilAlARoous 11ATERfALS FE w.~ro~7ffz-1l za o H !!~ ! 1.00 STATE F'£E (NOII·RES.) Z.2S 63010 7791, ·1 Z.25 ST02 OTY ffi OfS~RIPWN 1.00 < CCES PC FEE > 4 :!0 1.00 PlAN CH£ CIC FEES 105.30 41300 7341 1 !OS,30 1.00 UT!Li f!ES PLAU R£1 fEE I! . 71 41l00 734 5 ' 11,71 '"** GRID F0 4 *** *** GRID F04 *'''' REPORT ¥~1-920-01 BPIS PUR GED RECORDS AS OF 01/14ttl PAGE t 4~466 ADDRESS: 001702 CAM DleL RIO NORTH CONN: APN: 438 030 Od DO PLAN FILE: A010945 90 ~~9~1r---~st~R~unc~r7:-omor.,.---s~tnx~t~u~s7:'rr--l~s~s~ffi~~~o7:~onl~1•6~9nlr--E~lnP~iwR~es~:~o~s-ni 9~?T, --,fr.t~N~At~e~o~:~o~2r-z•~o~~~~--~P~u~~~Gtr.. o~,-wotn7~1T4~/9~3r- QTY FEE OESCRl!'TlON fEf FUND I,CCOUNT PAID KEY ----~Pl~AnN~(~H~E~C~~ ~F~EE~: ----~· ~o----,t~o~t7~~L -P~E~R~M~l~t~F~ET£s~:~------,,nv~z-. YlS~---.bTt•st~o~ur.u~t~Ft~X~G~~~-~,--~P~L~A~N~C~HE~c~k~:~---,srnu~I~L~Dlr.N~G~P7ER~"~I~I~:---- INVOICE NO AI'I OUtH PRlHTEO tNIT PAYMEtH Tl111c CASH ST REV OHE EO~ _____, O..,O,Dc,:.1..,28._,3~9c,:.1 _____...:._ 31..,A:.:.-"6"-3_01 16 91 DEC 01 16 ?1 11J1 IIEM P 01 )§ 91 TOTAL FEES INCURRED: 314.63 AMOUNT PAID TO DATE: 314.63 CLE46ANCE REO OK OA T£ -l~lT COK HENT$ KEY Y40CL ••====~======•===== CLEARANCE CHECKLIST ======~===~======•======•==•======C01111EM > STRU DATE SECT ------·------·· Legacy BPIS Permits THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO Page 1 of 2 Development Services (41-920-01 1222 First Avenue, San Diego. CA 92101-4154 )roject Information Plan File: A-100915-98 Status: A OTC: 0 Submitted: 02/05/1998 Contractor Info: E & J W ENTERPRISE Worker's Comp. Ins: GOLDEN EAGLE INS CO Owner Builder: 0 License: 566783 Phone: (619)440-1769 Policy: NWC 210795-01 CLS: 8 Expires: Expires: 01/11/1995 BTC: •urpose of Permit Address: 001702 CAM DEL RIO NORTH Address ID: APN: 438·030-0600 Permit Num: B-200595-98 Status: F Issued: 02/25/1998 Structure: 001 Comments: INTERIOR Tl WALLS, DUCTWORK DROP CELING, liGHTING Expires: 09/30/1998 BC Code: 4380 Flnaled: 04(03/1998 BC Desc: ADD/ALT TENANT IMPROVEMENTS Desc. of Work: INTERIORTI WALLS, DROP CELING, DUCTWORK, LIGHTING :ode Quantity Use/Type of Construction Rate Unit Value ------~----- :0~ --- . ,019 OTHER -TENANT IMPROVEMENT $22.00 ------SF $88,418.00 tructure Information ot: Modei/Desc: Type of Constr: II SPR lnspCat: S Soil: Bedrooms: Stories: OCC Group: A3/M Studio: 0 Permitted: Units: 0 OCCLoad: 1: 0 Fir Area: 2: 0 Plan Chech Fee: $497.57 3: 0 Total: Units: 0 4: 0 Fir Area: 4019 Valuation: lnlt: $86,418.00 5: 0 Bldg Area: Final: $88,418.00 5pection Status ;pectlon Type Scheduled ~ Complete I nit Status Other Remarks INTERIOR WALL CONST 03/03/1998 03/03/1998 SLB F INFO ONL Y/3RD FL. NE CORI INTERIOR WALL CONST 03/04/1998 03/04/1998 SLB F CANCEL AT SITE INTERIOR WALL CONST 03/06/1998 03/06/1998 SLB p SUSPENDED CEILINGS 03/16/1998 03/1611998 RAL F PP ANOP DRYWALL 03/09/1998 03/09/1998 RAE p FINAL 04/03/1998 04/03/1998 MXF p >ject Fee Calculation Qtv Description Fee Fund Account Paid Kev I p2k v 02.03.38 Stacey Harris 687-5916 ~gacy BPIS Permits THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO Development Services Page 1 of2 1222 First Avenue, San Diego, CA 92101-4154 lject Information Plan File: A-105721-00 Status: A OTC: 0 Submitted: 05/30/2000 .:ontractor Info: J M CONSULTING GROUP INC Worker's Comp. Ins: Owner Builder: 0 License: 684811 Phone: (619)516-7928 Polley: CLS: B Expires: 03/31/2002 Expires: BTC: •rpose of Permit Address: 001702 CAM DEL RIO NORTH Address ID: APN: 438-030·0600 Permit Num: B-203937-00 Status: F Issued: 09/26/2000 Structure: 001 Comments: Expires: 03/16/2002 BCCode: 3292 Finaled: 09/17/2001 BCOesc: ACC STRUCT TO 3+ FAM lese. of Work: TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY 'lde Quantity Use/Type of Construction Rate Unit Value 2 1 OTHER- CONTRACTORS VALUATION $20,000.00 EA $20,000.00 ucture Information t: Modei/Desc: Type of Constr: lnsp Cat: S Soil: --1edrooms: Stories: OCCGroup: Studio: 0 Permitted: Units: 0 OCCLoad: 1: 0 Fir Area: 2: 0 Plan Chech Fee: $208.06 3: 0 Total: Units: 0 4: 0 Fir Area: Valuation: lnit: $20,000.00 5: 0 Bldg Area: Final: $20,000.00 -" pection Status "ipection Type Scheduled ~ Complete Init ~ Other Remarks PROGRESS 03/07/2001 03/07/2001 MXF p PROGRESS 05/09/2001 05/09/2001 MAM p FINAL 05/18/2001 05/18/2001 MXF F FE SEE NOTICE FINAL 06/08/2001 06/08/2001 MAM F CONTRACTOR NOT FINAL 06/12/2001 06/12/2001 MAM F FINAL 06/18/2001 06/18/2001 MAM p FINAL 09/17/2001 09/17/2001 MAM p lject Fee Calculation . Qty Descrletfon Fee Fund Account Paid Key 1 < ACCESS PC FEE > $10.40 41300 73419 $10 .40 AC01 1 p2k v 02.03.38 Stacey Harr!s 687-5916 THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO Page 1 of 1 Development Services 64A-005 1222 First Avenue, San Diego, CA 92101-4154 roject Information roject Nbr: 232116 Title: AT&T- Texas Street 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111 •oject Mgr: D'Orsl, Donna (619)446-5164 [email protected] pproval Information Approval Nbr: 8 30780 Type: Building Permit Status: Completed I I JJ~IIJIIUI~ftMIItlllllllllllll Issued: 06/12/2012 6:10am Issued By: Adams, Tamara Permit Holder: Ramirez, Elizabeth- AT&T Mobility Completed: 03/14/2013 8:14am Completed By: Aguirre, Fernando Owner Occupied: 0 Overridden:D :xtension Qty: 0 Extended By: CanceiReiiiSon: Scope: Building Permit for the installation of (12) 8' panel antennas. Precancel Status: Land Doc Type: Recorded Map No.: Recorded Date: tb Location (1702 CAMINO DEL RIO NORTH) Address Assessor Parcel 1702 CAMINO DEL RIO NORTH 438-030-0600 ueau of Census (BC) Codes BCCode ACC STRUCT- NON RES e Type Units Fee Type Amount Valuation -CBC 106,932.00 DwellingUnlt NetChange(+,-,0) 0.00 e Worksheet Fee Quantity Unit Category Antennas BP 12.00 Each Issuance Fees Antennas PC 12.00 Each Submittal Fees Application Extension 1.00 Each Plan Check Fees BuildgStand Surcharge SB1473 106,932.00 Valuation -CBC Issuance Fees Hrly-DSD lnsp Structural 2.00 Hours Inspection Fees Hrly-DSD RIIW Structural 2.00 Hours Plan Check Fees Issuance-With Plans 1.00 Each Issuance Fees LeadHaz Prevention & Control 1.00 Each Issuance Fees Records-Com/MDU(Calcs&Std) 1.00 Each Issuance Fees Records-Com/MDU(No Cales &Std) 0.00 Each Issuance Fees Seismic Fee (Bldg Permit) 106,932.00 Valuation -CBC issuance Fees State Fee (Bldg Permit) 106,932.00 Valuation -CBC Issuance Fees I p2k v 02.03.38 Stacey Harris 687-5916 A.S - SI'l'E PLAN ATTACHED 153/.1 A31WA NOISS\~ J. A. 6 - LOT AND BLOCK BOOK PAGE NOT REQUIRED A.7 -PREVIOUS SURVEY FORMS NONE FOUND B.l - CHAIN OF TITLE ATTACHED California Lot Book, Inc. dba California Title Search Co. P .0. Box 9004 Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 (858) 278-8797 Fax (858) 278-8393 [email protected] vV\..VW.LOTBOOK.COM Chain of Title Report Marie Burke Lia CTS Reference No.: 0613190 427 C Street, Suite 416 Your Ref. No.: 1063 San Diego, CA 92101 Title Search Through: May 29,2013 Property Address: 1702 Camino Del Rio N San Diego, CA 92108 Assessor's Parcel No.: 438-030-06-00 Assessed Value: $15,775,970 Exemption: None Property Character istics Use: Shopping Center Improvements: 99,999 square feet Short L e~al Description LOT 4 OF MISSION VALLEY SHOPPING CENTER, IN THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 4244, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY niNE 30, 1959, AS FURTHER DESCRIBED. Page I of 4 California Lot Book, Inc., dba California Title Search Co. CTS Reference No.: 0613190 Chain of Title (October 9, 1957 through May 29, 2013) 1. Certificate of Limited Partnership and Limited Partnership Agreement - Mission Valley Partnershlp General Partner: May Mission Valley Corp. Limited Partners: May Camino Del Rio Corp., W. B. Miller, William W. Miller, Margaret M. White, Ross H. Bond, Ross H. Bond, Jr., Paula D. Bond, Elaine B. Marteeny, and Valley Land Company Recorded: October 9, 1957, #154925, Book 6785, Page 101 2. First Amendment to Certificate of Limited Partnership and Limited Partnership Agreement - Mission Valley Partnership Recorded: June 18, 1959, #123669, Book 7724, Page 407 3. Grant Deed Grantor: Mission Valley Partnership Grantee; The May Department Stores Company Recorded: June 22, 1959, #125422, Book 7728, Page 525 4. Agreement First Party: Mission Valley Partnership Second Party: The May Department Stores Company Recorded: August 5, 1960, Recorders File No. 60-159202 5. Lease Landlord: The May Department Stores Company Tenant: Mission Valley Partnership Recorded: August 5, 1960, Recorders File No. 60-159203 6. Lease Landlord: Mission Valley Partnership Tenant: The May Department Stores Company Recorded: August 5, 1960, Recorders File No. 60-159204 Please be advised that this is not Title Insurance. The information provided herein reflects matters of public record which impart constructive notice in accordance with California Insurance Code 12340.10 Page 2 of 4 7. First Agreement for Amendment of Lease Landlord: The May Department Stores Company Tenant: Mission Valley Partnership Recorded: October 27, 1962, Recorders File No. 62-220557 8. Second Agreement for Amendment of Lease Landlord: Mission Valley Partnership Tenant: The May Department Stores Company Recorded: October 27, 1962, Recorders File No. 62-220557 9. Agreement First Party: Mission Valley Partnership Second Party: The May Department Stores Company Recorded: October 27, 1962, Recorders File No. 62-220561 10. Second Amendment to Certificate of Limited Partnership and Limited Partnership Agreement - Mission Valley Partnership Recorded: September 25, 1963, Recorders File No. 63-171889 11. Third Amendment to Certificate of Limited Partnership and Limited Partnership Agreement - Mission Valley Partnership Recorded: January 2, 1964, Recorders File No. 64-865 12. Amendment to Certificate of Limited Partnership and Limited Partnership Agreement of Mission Valley Partnership Recorded: September 17, 1970, Recorders File No. 70-168873 13. Corporation Grant Deed Grantor: The May Department Stores Company Grantee: May Properties, Inc. Recorded: January 29, 1973, Recorders File No. 73-24425 14. Lease Landlord: May Properties, Inc. Tenant: The :rvfay Department Stores Company Recorded: January 29, 1973, Recorders File No. 73-24426 15. Sixth Amendment to Certificate of Limited Partnership and Limited Partnership Agreement of Mission Valley Partnership Recorded: July 13, 1981~ Recorders File No. 81-219865 Please be advised that this is not Title Insurance. The information provided herein reflects matters of public record which impart constructive notice in accordance with California Insurance Code 12340.10 Page 3 of 4 16. Seventh Amendment to Certificate of Limited Partnership and Limited Partnership Agreement of Mission Valley Partnership Recorded: December 14, 1981, Recorders File No. 81-391076 1 7. Tenth Amendment to Certificate of Limited Partnership and Limited Partnership Agreement of Mission Valley Partnership Recorded: February 23, 1996, Recorders File No. 96-88698 18. Eleventh Amendment to Certificate of Limited Partnership and Limited Partnership Agreement of Mission Valley Partnership Recorded: February 23, 1996, Recorders File.No. 96-88699 19. Twelfth Amendment to Certificate of Limited Partnership and Limited Partnership Agreement of Mission Valley Partnership Recorded: December 17, 1997, Recorders File No. 97-641600 20. Thirteenth Amendment to Certificate of Limited Partnership and Limited Partnership Agreement of Mission Valley Partnership Recorded: December 19,2006, Recorders File No. 06-898273 21 . Fifte~nth Amendment to Certificate of Limited Pattnership and Limited Partnership Agreement of Mission Valley Partnership. Recorded: January 6, 2009, Recorders File No. 09-4166 22. Sixteenth Amendment to Certificate of Limited Partnership and Limited Partnership Agreement of Mission Valley Partnership Recorded: February 13,2012, Recorders File No. 12-80801 - End of Report- Note: We find no recorded evidence of a Notice of Completion for original construction. ******************** Please be advised that tlus is not Title Insurance. The information provided herein reflects matters of public record which impart constructive notice in accordance with California Insurance Code 12340.10. Note that we are not a Title Insurance Company, and that no express or implied warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of the information provided herein is granted. Our work has been performed under short time constraints with a quick turn around, and is based in part on the use of databases outside of our control. The recipient hereby acknowledges that California Lot Book, Inc. assumes no liability with respect to any errors or omissions related to the information provided herein. Also note that this search has been performed without the benefit of a Statement of Identification from the property owners, and if a search was performed for liens recorded against owner names, we cannot be sure that the information provided relates to the actual property owners, or is complete with respect to the property owners. In any event, our liability is limited to the amount offees collected for the information provided herein. ******************** Page4 of 4 B.2 - CITY DIRECTORY LISTINGS OF OCCUPANTS ATTACHED SAN DIEGO CITY DIRECTORY 1702 Camino Del Rio North San Diego, CA 92108 Year Occupant 1961-1993 May Company Department Store 1994-Present Macy's Department Store B.3 - DEED FROM DATE OF CONSTRUCTION NONE FOUND C.l - CITY OF SAN DIEGO 800 SCALE ENGINEERING MAP ATTACHED .. , -·. . ... , .... ••• ' ··~ .. . ..,. . .. ·----o ~-~.- ....'""!. J . . • .·. ' ~ . ,. ... \ .. .. ' ~ . C.2 - CURRENT UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MAP (USGS) ATTACHED C.3 - ORIGINAL SUBDIVISION MAP ATTACHED MAP NO. 'j .::. L/ 'i' ~ 0 SHEET 4 OF 4 SHEETS :g <.C MISSION VALLEY SHOPPING CENTER ·' ~ ~- ~ .s ~ · '-"-'rO;r ,.,, 1111' 15. ..,. ;.~ "'~ .ot.7.1"'ft".Jo'L • _I'.JZ.S...CM" • i.. ~ .i /V.E.'. >i p L. .ff{)l" '1:: DETAIL •c ~ .2 .. -~. J . J/ ~ !,.~-; ~ ,? il I .J'.i'J'r' rl" , '-"'.J ~~- ;--.v~-~HIIf-r.w _1 I rt~~~rjl ·•'r"'• ~! ff ~ J~~- r1J~"~""'" 'IAIUNI>";71 -.:.ncrr ...... -~ 1 ~ ~.,.._lf,."-An ._ ..&1.,. "L.Jif17 .., .,_,... .;.o.n.Diffl .;_ p../c,...-J 1 ~..J. ,... ..,.,;? i'!· .&..~·~ --~-- , .i"> _ ..,M"'J~ ~L ~- ... M. ~-~ - v - N- ""' I - "'..,c l ·VSl N " ...... -- - tz •Vf'~~~ ~:;S' ...... --.A•' j \. ~ ,..."'.i; ~ ~ ._ .. _;__ ___ :. .. ,_ ~ , l 0 - J#~-· ,.,-L ... ,b:_:.::.J!o'" ·q-....-r- t ·;~~ . .• ~1· Q ....,__ t"'#J:"' ..t .~ :;~. F:.~ -~ ~i • .. ~ •. ! t-:::.~B ir DEr.AtL "o " NOT£5: J.W~p .,.j ~ - ~ .....__, -l'i"~~n-.o I ~~~~f~:~ I ... ~;:;.t;;rr~ :U--$0-n·tD "c: "...... llc; "'' "' "'~ l..Eo:rND c. •.y'C7,Co o u 0 Ar;;,/1 ~ _,. ! rt-·~•.1¥ 1,~• .lnvJ~ ~Rh-~,;.,>;s ~ ( .,. ,,. l• ,..s# , ~,~· 1/i!.t:.£ f4fN, Hq.~~ ~~A~J/ ~ c . ~ .. htli~~N .- ~ ~Vtth ..C.-"1"":: ~ ~ r :? ~~m-p.fv'-...1~ Ptt;t.· c '!U'- ;;-.cf .f•,..NP• ~ =~nil~. ,,.,,~;v, /fL. ~,:;r WUL!.W !hd'i~tl/•:# 145 v~~ .rJ-,8/-6 ""~a ,...;~.-/ J .,. ~. " -~ ~~ t.7.f:::r£; :C::f:r:7$'t;;;:P J !". f:il~r:Y..,e~. • • IJ if~ ~~ ~ ' ' · ~ -~ {%'~~~;~~fg~·~i~ .. ~.e 1 .. zoo ~ r.M. E C.4 -CURRENT ASSESSOR'S PARCEL MAP ATTACHED '0 .c~ i"' 9 438-03 "' t~~- ~ {/) u~ .~~rWN' :'1":z .,. ::~;:r-.. .. ':~ ~_ ..,!.;:P a~ "'.... @ ·~' ~ W1 ~ ~ 'I :. ~: = : gsa II.~If ~~'("~,":c ~.. l: 5 ~ IYI$..'1• I'',.Jo· @ ~ ! 1·~ ~ ~ I ~ n i ~- ~~: ~[~ '/J ~ 15.37.AC. -'o J ~ ~1 -~ o_,. C'!...,<>~ ~ i!; "l ,...... ~,..,n < I t.l U l~ a g, G ill' · ~'W 'oo,.DO .!2 H Nlio:rro3"W 89.16 0 .." tJ) .. "' ~" .,.,.. "' Nll"'_..l'i"'-'£ REINA LA ~ -;,.· ;,.s: ~::-£ .,j=...:f-" P~l7G46 PAR I @ toi§} 9 •.29 AC -~.,~... ~,J?I. ,. .. n ~r,. ·~ :J ,-:y,;:::; rr ! =:.~.~·..z:: - U ''"" 'li~ t:lt_ll 4:::JI• ~;t PAR 2 § SO AC 4 ~• _ Difl.>.IL "9" SCALE: 1 ,.~~lV._ib-'1~.ot,, :,. 0 ~\~ "l.~ii!l u:. ~ .,411 -r~ 'MAP 13~-PARK IN THE. VALLEY I"U 1Td"o1"S .11.4 8 ~ 'ZtJ -·· .. ,., 77• .... , . . 6 ... ~ '-'!!". - HISSION VALLEY SHOPPING CNTR UNIT NO 2 "~,...... ,...... ,.CA A.I INO C•t t Ril..'""l r\ORTH FRIARS ROAD SUB . INTERSTATE 8 ~ - MISSION VALLEY SHOPPING CENTER 'JUL 1 7 2002 XI-SD-12-SD - PUEBLO LANDS 'Y 10437 C.5 - SANBORN FIRE INSURANCE MAPS NONE FOUND D.l - HISTORICAL PHOTOGRAPHS ATTACHED 1953 Aerial Photograph 1959 Aerial Photograph / - ~ .r , ~ ~-:· ., ..__... ,;:r = · "~ _, - -= .l' ./ ~ = • ...... -...... ~-"' ,,. "'' .... ~- ~ ). ; Post 1959 Aerial Photograph 1964 Aerial Photograph 2003 Aerial Photograph 1702 Camino Del Rio North, San Diego7 CA- Google Maps Page 1 of 1 To 5ee all the details that are visible on the l screen. u&e the "Print'' link next to the map. Go gle 2013 Aerial Photograph View facing slightly Southeast https://maps.google.com/ 7/9/2013 1702 Can1ino Del Rio North, San Diego ~ CA_- Google tviaps Page l of 1 ------=----~ To 5ee all the details that a.re v·isible on tne \ I screen, usa the "Print" link: next to the map J 8 2013 Aerial Photograph View facing slightly Northwest https://maps. google,com/ 7/9/20 t 3 • t) () ~I I • ~ ..... ~xro rI ! Ii I l '~ f I· I I I I lt . I f ;Mission P..QOI'I\ tC :ms · l D.2 - CURRENT PHOTOGRAPHS ATTACHED East Fa~ade / 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #1 View West of South end of East fa~ade 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #2 View west of South end of East fa~ade 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #3 View North of East fa~ade 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #4 View west of detail of bricks on East far;ade 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #5 View West of fire exits on East fa~ade 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #6 View Northwest of East fa~ade 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #7 View Northwest of East fa~;ade 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #8 View West of East fa~;ade 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #9 View Northwest of East fac;:ade and East fac;:ade entrance 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #10 View West of East fac;:ade entrance 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #11 View West of East fa~ade 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #12 View Southwest of East fa~ade 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #13 View South of East fa~ade 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #14 View Southeast of East fac;ade columns 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #15 View Southwest of corner of East and North fa~ades South Fa~ade 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #1 View Northwest of South fac;ade corner 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #2 View North of decorative wall surface 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #3 View Northwest of West end of South fa~;ade 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #4 View North of South fa~;ade I I I 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #5 View Northeast of Dog Park on South fa~;ade 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #6 View East of the South fa~;ade walkway 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #7 View West along South fa<;ade past entrance #1 toward Dog Park 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #8 View Northwest of South fac;:ade 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #9 View Northwest of South fa~ade, west of entrance #1 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #10 View North of entrance #1 South far;ade 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #11 View Northeast adjacent to entrance #1 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #12 View East from entrance #1 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #13 View North of fac;:ade east of entrance #1 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #14 View Northeast of South fac;:ade 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #15 View East near end of South fa~ade 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #16 View of Northeast at end of South fa~ade West Fa~ade 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #1 View North of West fat;ade 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #2 View East of West fat;ade display window 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #3 View East of West fa~ade display window 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #4 View Northeast of West fa~ade 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #5 View Northeast of West fac;ade 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #6 View East of West fac;ade entrance 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #7 View Southeast of West fa~ade 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #8 View North of West fa~ade 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #9 View East of West fa~ade entrance 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #10 View Southeast of West far;ade 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #11 View East of West fa~ade 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #12 View Southeast of West fac;:ade North Fa~ade 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #1 View of East of North fa~ade 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #2 View of North fa~ade 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #3 View South of North fa~ade 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #4 View South of North fac;:ade 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #5 View of North fa«;ade entrance 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #6 View Southeast of North fa«;ade entrance 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #7 View Southwest of North fa<;ade 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #8 View Southwest of North fac;:ade 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #9 View West of North fa~ade 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #10 View West of North fa<;ade 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #11 View North of North fa~ade 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #12 View West of North fa~ade 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #13 View Southwest of North fa<;ade 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #14 View Southwest of North fa<;ade 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #15 View Southwest of North fa~ade 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #16 View West of North fa~ade :oJe • EJ!MANN'S iuRGER~lNG i1£f 'CTOR ~m~ 1702 Camino Del Rio North November 2015 Photograph #17 View of end of alley ofthe North fa~ade E. 1 - SUPPLEMENTAL DOCUMENTATION WILLIAM S. LEWIS JR. , MODERNSANDIEGO. COM EXTERIOR ELEv.ATIONS 1959 AND 2015 ADDENDUM MEMO BY CITY WORKS ARCHITECTURAL FIRM ATTACHED Deems, Lewis, Martin & Associates Ward Wyatt Deems Biography WilliamS. lewis Jr. Biography Early History of the Architectural Firm In 1954 with his degree in hand from USC's School of Architecture, Ward Deems joined the Los Angeles firm of MODERN SAN DIEGO AC Martin (partners Albert C. Martin, Jr. and J. Edward Martin). William ("Bill") S. Lewis Jr., having also recently graduated from the same program (in 1953), joined the firm shortly thereafter. Ward Deems was appointed an Associate of the Firm in 1958 while Bill Lewis served as lead designer on several projects. During the years 1958-59, Deems explored the potential of opening an office in San Diego - then a cheaper, slower-paced city surviving on tourism and military spending. When Ward advised the Martins of his plan to move south they saw in this an opportunity to expand their operation. Together they decided to open a San Diego office. In April1959, a corporate agreement was signed to launch Deems-Martin Associates. At the time, Bill Lewis was completing the design of the May Company store in Mission Valley and agreed to join Deems in launching the new company. With financial and brand support from the AC Martin firm, they opened their office in the El Cortez Building -Ward being responsible for public relations and business development functions. Bill Lewis focused on design and project management. Within a few years, Bill became a co-owner and the firm became Deems Lewis Martin & Associates. One of their earliest, most notable, and visible to the public, projects, the steel screen ensconced Crabtree Building (at 3rd & A Streets) was designed by Robert Jones (who would later join in partnership with Henry Hester). In 1961, the firm Deems/Lewis & Partners worked its way through their first San Diego recession. Embracing the city-wide motto "Try San Diego First" they and other firms worked to keep clients from heading to Los Angeles to have their projects designed. The firm watched San Diego grow larger and more sophisticated. One important milestone was the shift of retail from downtown to Mission Valley as Walker Scott and Marston's folded- in part because of their design for Mission Valley shopping center. As the firm changed its shingle from Deems-Martin Associates to Deems Lewis Martin & Associates, then to Deems/Lewis & Partners and subsequently to Deems Lewis McKinley Architects, and grew rapidly in its first few decades, many strong architects cut their teeth in the drafting room. Several of these architects would strike out on their own, or join other partnerships to put their stamp on San Diego's built environment. Among these were Robert E. Jones (1960-61), Edward Malone, Donald Goldman (1962- 64), Walt Conwell, Jerry Shonkweiler, John Stevenson, James A. Purcell, John McKinley, Neil Larson, Jack Carpenter and several others. Partial List of San Diego Projects Hillcrest North Medical Center (1964) 550 Fifth Avenue at Washington Street, San Diego, CA Building of the Year, San Diego Magazine Humanities Library-Galbraith Hall (1965) UCSD Revelle College. La Jolla, CA Building of the Year, San Diego Magazine Industrial Indemnity (197D-74) Industrial Indemnity (197D-74) 3255 Camino del Rio South, San Diego, CA AlA Honor Award (Phase 1) AlA Award of Merit (Phase 2), AlA San Diego Chapter LKRD Medical Office Building (1970) 3260 3rd Street, San Diego, CA AlA Award of Merit, AlA San Diego Chapter Mission Valley Center Mission Valley Center (ca. 1960) San Diego Orr, Dr. & Mrs. Robert J. Residence (1960) 2382 Via Capri Court, La Jolla, CA Award of Merit, AlA San Diego Chapter Rubin, Seltzer, Soloman Bldg. Rubin, Seltzer & Soloman Building {1964) 3003 Fourth Avenue Notes: Recently remodeled with bad diagonal patio enclosure after recent fire. Ruselso Office Building (1963) 3003 Fourth Avenue, San Diego, CA Note: Badly remodeled Project Architect: Donald Goldman, AlA Award of Merit, AlA San Diego Chapter San Diego County Welfare Office Building (1963) HHFA First Honor Award Torrey Pines High School (1976) 3710 Del Mar Heights Road, Del Mar, CA Honor Award, Unit Masonry Association U.S. Customs Station (1969) San Ysidro, CA U.S. Navy Anti-Submarine Warfare School Mess Hall (1967) Nimitz Blvd and Harbor Drive, San Diego, CA U.S. Navy Enlisted Men's Barracks (1964) Anti Submarine Warfare School. Harbor Drive and Nimitz Blvd AlA Honor Award, AlA San Diego Chapter U.S. Post Office Facility (1972) 2535 Midway Drive, San Diego, CA AlA Award of Merit, AlA San Diego Chapter http://www.modernsandiego.com/ Gl HI ' J K L M N (p 0 A s T u v w. _1 12'-0" L :w-tr L 24'-Q" 24'-0" L 24'-0" I 24'-0" L 24'-0" L 24'-0" 32'-0" 24'-0' 24'-Q" 24'-0" L 24'-{)' 24'-0" , ., 7 ;rL I 7 7 ,.l L 7k I k 1 f I I "; ~ Removed Historic I I I I . I I I I I I I I I ' Building Element j ' I D Area of Alteration 0 J i- Courtyard canopy and "K ,... _ ~ columns removed Pop-out display window I' altered beyond :signage Removed -I I I -r-I 12'-0"-- { I East Facade Elevation 1959 Scale: 1/32" = 1 '-0" Gl H1 J K L M. N p 0 R s T u v •W Legend 12·-o· 24'-0' 24'-0' 24' -0' 24' -0" 24'-0' 24'-0" 24'-0' 32'-0" 24'-0' 24'-0" 24'-0" 24'-0" 24'-0' L k 1.! L T ; k ,; rl ,.~ ,k I L rL 7 ~ )"l 7 ~ 7 7l 7L ;; I I I I I I I Solid walls added at ' ' I I ' _j___' -1. previous pop-out window -'-----I display areas I I Structures - Attached I I I to Macy's wall ~ ====~~~~~~==~- I ·-I sv=-T· I Wall finish added or altered / -- Signage added D : Line of retail buildings immediately t~dl)acys- 1 adjacent to Macy's wall Line of retail structure I I I located immediately , __ Solid walls added ,_ 1 Enclosed service area - no roof adjacent to Macy's wall at previous doors : I I Planters or Plaster wall finish " Fenced attached to Macy's wall o I D Platform - Added added ;·,, I Concrete platform and planters added beyond I I BUFFALO WILD WINGS East Facade Elevation 2015 Scale: i/32" -= 1 '-0" Macy•s - Mission Valley: Exterior Elevation Scale: 1/32"=1 '-0" Date: 12.09.15 17 ·16 15 14 13 12~ 11 ..1 0 9 a' '7 6 s . 4 3 2 I Legend 25'-0" L 25'· 0' 25'-0" 25'-0" L 25'-0' L 25'·0' L 25'-0" I 25'·0' 25'·0' 25'-0" I 25'·0' 25'-0" L 25'-0' 25'-0' L :?5'-0' 25'-0" L L >j , k / L l ,l ~ "i I ' ~. 7i ~ ~ Removed Historic ' I "·I I "• I' "' ' ' "'I I ' Building Element ' ~ - ~ ~ ; Area of Alteration " 0 • D ' ' I I Line of retail buildings I I I I located in front of - Signage Removed ; I I Macy's Pop-out display window Pop-out display window ' altered removed that extended in Courtyard canopy and front of storefront entrance I Courtyard canopy and columns removed columns removed I Pop-out display Pop-out display windows altered window removed beyond South Facade Elevation 1959 Scale: 1/32"- 1 '-0" 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 ' 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Legend L. 25'-0' c 25'-0' L 25'-0' [, 25'-0' L 25'-0' L 25'-0' L 25'-0' L 25',0' L 25',0' L 25'-0' L 25'-0' L 25'-0' L 25'-0' L 25'-0' L 25'-0' l 25'-0' 7 I I' 7 r I 7 / 7 7 , 7 t , 7 l I I I I ;; ;: I I ~ Solid walls added at ' 'I ' I previous pop-out window ' I I display areas I I I Structures - Attached : I' to Macy's wall ' c=J Wall finish added or altered Signage - added Line of retail structure located immediately adjacent to Macy's wall -- Wall finish added Planters or D Platform - Added 'I I' ' ~I ~ ·~ -~ Line of retail buildings Concrete platform Wall finish added located in front of • and planters added Macy's TILTED KILT .,..I South Facade Elevation 2015 Scale: 1/32" = 1 '-0" Macy's - Mission Valley: Exterior Elevation Scale: 1/32"=1'-0" Date: 12.09.15 ;W: v u r s R 0 p N M L K J i·U IG1 Legend L 24'-0" L 24'-0" L 24'-0" L 24'-0" L 24'-0" L 32'·0" l 24'-0" L 24'-0" L 24'-0" L 24'-0" L 24'-0' L 24'-0" 24'-0" L12 ·-o· 1 , 7' .,. , 7' 7' , , 7' 7 7 J 7 / I '"I . I I I I I I I I I Removed Historic I I I ' I ' I I 'I I I' Building Element Area of Alteration D • I 9 I I ~ ...... Pop-out display J _ Pop-out display window - I ~ windows removed removed beyond · 1 • ' il) I Canopy and columns removed-' Pop-out display -- + - Signage Removed at covered courtyard ' C\i windows removed 1 ' beyond Pop-out display • window removed : Canopy and colums removed -- Walls altered -'·- ·J Pop-out display window 7' I removed beyond 1 I West Facade Elevation 1959 Scale: 1/32' = 1'-0" v ·u R Hl ;G1 24'·0" [ 32'·0" 24'-0' L12·-o· L Legend r r ' 1 I Solid walls added at I I D previous pop-out window Solid wall added at previm display areas pop-out display window beyond ; Structures - Attached to Macy's wall Concrete platform and 'I pl~nters ~dded beyond 1 - Wall finish added or altered I Signage - added D Line of retail buildings ~ m~cys I located in front of Line of retail structure Line of new buildings 1 Macy's ; located immediately attached to face of 1, I ;r adjacent to Macy's wall Macy's existing wall Solid wall added at door ~ Planters or with brick wall finish ' Platform - Added i --, -~~ ~""....._ ...... ~ ~" i " • · ' ~ '·"--" ~ .....~.- . . . ----· ._,.·,, - -·---· -t ------t-- ·-t------1 I ~ l II t ~ I Wall finish altered Solid walls added 'I ' EUROPEAN WAJ< CENTER REStROOMS , PERF~ME GALLERY RISING S U~ COMICS TllJ~O l West Facade Elevation 2015 Scale: 1/32"- 1 '-0' Macy's - Mission Valley: Exterior Elevation Scale: 1/32"=1 '-0" Date: 12.09.15 1 2/ ·. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 I I 12 'q, 14 15 16 17· l 25'-0' L 25'-0' l 25'-0" 25'-0" L 25'-0' L 25'-Q' - ~ 25'-0' L 25'-0' 25'-Q' 25'-0" I 25'-0' L 25'-0' 25'-0' L 25'-0' L 25'-0" 25'-0" 7 7 ~ I 7 7 L r L 7 7 k 7 7 7 k ), I I ' I ': I I I I I I I Removed Historic I I I I I I I I " I Building Element " -1 I D Area of Alteration Signage Removed: ~ : ~ I ' ~ (n Pop-out display Pop-out display ,__ Canopy and all "? ,._ windows removed windows removed: columns removed ..,.0 beyond =';;> '" _ ..,.iP'k I b Solid pair doors Walls altered Solid pair doors Pop-out display and transom and transoms windows removed beyond North Facade Elevation 1959 Scale: 1/32" = 1 1-0" 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 '10 11 12 13 15 16 17 25'-0' 25'-0' L 25'-0" L 25' -0' L 25'-0' L 25'-0' 25'-0' 25'-0' L 25'-0' 25'-0' L 25'-0' 25'-0' L 25'-0' 25'-0' c 25'-0' [ 25'-0' k 7 k .r 7 7 l ) 7 k ) 7L r 7 7 7 I I J I I ~ I I I I ' ' Solid walls added at ' " previous pop-out window -· display areas • Structures - Attached to Macy's wall ~ .. ' I I I ' 1 Wall finish added or altered Signage - added • --- Enclosed Service Entry canopy attached to face of Restrooms and D : Area - no roof Macy's exterior wall · Retail store 1 Line of retail buildings 1 Solid wall Line of retail structure +- - Line of retail buildings immediately attached to : added immediately •: added at door adjcent to Macy's wall face of Macy's located immediately ; ~ :· i 1 L ___;:-- [ll J L ___;_____;_ _JL _ adjce~o Macy's wa~ _ Gl~ed tile wall Solid wall and new glazed tile finish exterior wall. • adjacent to Macy's wall added- extends behind entry canopy ~-- ~ -~ -- -:------I ' r ' I I ' finish added Planters or I I ' I' 1 I I I I I ~-+~ , Service Area __ J. ___ -·-____ ::,.• ...... ,.""":""""i' D Platform - Added E~closed -=-_n~~f-~ ~ _,.....,.d,._,=""~!O""-.~....,,_.;t,.,.!~ .,..._...,..,~f+..... I I I I ' ' r - J I I -r-:.__---,~~..--.....L..;:~~~-...1t-.,....,.----.. I I I Gate secured to face Wall attached 2'-8" high Glazed tile wall finish 2'-8" high ' Wall attached of Macy's wall to Macy's concrete that extends behind concrete to Macy's wall planter entry canopy planter wall BUFFALO WILD WINGS QUARTER POUND- KOREAN BBQ MACY'S ENTRANCE BLOOMINGDALE'S THE OUTLET STORE RESTROOMS / - - j(- - / / _ ------~ PERFUME_ '/" GALlERY North Facade Elevation 2015 (elevation viewed from within mall) Scale: 1/32" = 1 1-0" Macy's - Mission Valley: Exterior Elevation Scale: 1/32"=1 '-0" Date: 12.09.15 w v w v Height Varies Precast concrete wall panels :·j ~ I - I .I I I Retail Tenant ------..... I-- ·.. • Improvement wall Canopy and \ Canopy opening \ ~ Columns above planters . I ,1' I I II ------] I ------I'--' . *===== J =l Macy's I I Demolished Service Corridor for Macy's I 1 . Department Wall Tile finish . J : 1958 canopy Retail Ten ants Department Store and columns Store 1 1 shown dashed ~ 1 1 ' I : 1 : Concrete finish over Planter 1 1pervious concrete ,..._.., Concrete Walk .--- deck I . ' ~~---- · lr;;t ~ ,,- . I t--- '1 I l Basement Stock Room Basement Stock Room I I". Canopy Section 1958 Canopy Section 2015 Scale: 3/16" = 1'-0" Scale: 3/16" = 1'-0" Macy's - Mission Valley: Sections Cut at North Side of Building Scale: 1/32"=1 '-0" - City\'%'®[?~~ Date: 12.09 15 .. ·-u Addendum Memo from closer review of Hope Plans for May Company Store at Mission Valley Mall Date: 12.9.15 NORTH FACADE 1959 Hope Drawings, Sheet 16 - North Elevation First Floor This fa<;:ade consists of 16 bays, 15 of which have a canopy that extends beyond the face of the building. Starting at the east end, between grid lines 2 and 3, there is a solid wall. The bay between grid lines 3 and 4 has a double solid door and transom flanked by a solid wall. There are solid walls between grid lines 4 and 6. Between grid lines 6 and 7 there is a pop-out display window with a solid wall and a door behind it. Flanking the pop-out display window are solid walls. The Bay between grid lines 7 and 8 contains Entrance #3 that includes four glass doors and transom, with glass sidelights. Between grid lines 8 and 9 there is a pop-out dis play window. Flanking the pop-out display window is a solid wall. Bays between grid lines 9 and 12 are solid walls with two sets of solid double doors and transoms. Bays between grid lines 12 through 16 are solid walls. 1959 Hope Drawings, First Floor Plan - Sheets 5 & 6 This fa<;:ade consists of 16 bays. All elements between the 1959 versions of the floor plan and the North fa <;:ade elevation correspond with the exception of: 1) in-ground planters are shown on the floor plan but do not appear on the Fa<;:ade elevation, and 2) the canopy does not extend between grid lines 16 and 17 on the floor plan as it does on the fa<;:ade elevations. 2015 CityWorks' Drawings of this Elevation from within the Mall - First Floor 15 of the 16 Bays have been altered where the canopy was completely removed. The brick wall finish is all that remains intact for most of the historic fa<;:ade, below the canopy. But it is not visible or has been altered by: attached walls and buildings, adjacent buildings and at the entrance, a projected arched canopy with eight large, round columns that extend into flanking bays. Although the entrance continues in its same location the rest of the building front functions as a service area and no longer as a retail fa<;:ade. More specifically, at the bay between grid lines 2 and 3 a new gate has been attached to the Macys fa<;:ade. Between grid lines 3 and 6 solid walls and a solid double door and transom remain . Also, between grid lines 2 and 5 the May Company co () sign has been removed and replaced by a Macys sign. Between grid lines 5 and 6, a new wall is attached to c5 the face, and a new glazed wall tile finish and a concrete planter have been added. Within the bay between Ol (]) 6 and 7 there is a solid wall where the door to the pop-out display window used to exist, and a new glazed '0 c wall tile finish and a concrete planter have been added. Additionally, the new entrance canopy was added co (f) that starts just east of grid line 7 and ends just west of grid line 8. Between grid lines 8 and 9, a new wall was added where the pop-out window display was removed. Also added was the glazed wall tile finish and a con 0 0 <0 crete planter that both extend into this bay. At a portion of the bay between grid lines 9 and 1 0, the glazed wall (]) tile and concrete planter continue from the easterly bay. Also, added was a wall with a service door that was ·s -(f) attached to the Macys fa<;:ade. Between grid lines 1 0 to 13 solid walls and two sets of solid double doors and a5 transoms remain . At the bays between gridlines 13 and 17, a restroom and a retail space have been attached ~ tJ to the face of_the Macys building. co ..... (f) (]) 5: 0 + T : 619.238.9091 cityworks.biz 2015 GityWorks · Drawings of this Efevation - First Floor Between grid lines G-1 and J, the colonnade attached to the south wall was removed and the pop-out window was covered with a plaster finished wall . Between grid lines P and Q and RandS the pop-out window displays were removed and a solid wall replaced a door opening into the display area and a white plaster wall finish was added. Ad ditionally, concrete platforms and planters were added. Between grid lines V and W the colonnade attached to the north face was removed and a gate to a service area was added. Therefore, 4 out of 14 Bays have been altered and 29% of this East fagade has been altered. WEST FA<;ADE 1959 Hope Drawings, Sheets 15 - West Elevation First Floor This fagade consists of 14 bays. Starting at the south end, between grid lines G-1 and L there is a rectangular court yard created by a colonnade made up of a covered canopy and columns that surround an open area with planters and walkways. More specifically, between grid lines G-1 and J, in addition to a canopy and columns there is a pop-out dis play window beyond that is attached to the south wall. Between grid lines J and L the colonnade continues and there is solid wall that flanks a pop-out display window. Between grid lines K and L the colonnade continues and there is a pop-out display window. Between grid lines L and Q there is solid wall and two display windows. Between grid lines R and Q there is Entrance # 2 that consists of 4 glass storefront doors and a transom that is flanked by 2 glass sidelights. Between grid lines R to V the pop-out display windows and solid wall mirror the placement of those between grid lines Land Q. Between grid lines V and W there are canopy and columns attached to the north side of the building. 1959 Hope Drawings, Sheets 5 & 6 - First Floor Plan There are no differences between the floor plans and the elevations with the exception that: 1) the in-ground planters are not noted on the elevations and 2) also not shown on the on the elevation is where the northern canopy and col umns extend west beyond the May Co. building to the other mall buildings. 2015 CityWorks' Drawings of this Elevation- First Floor Between grid lines G-1 and K, the most south and west portions of the courtyard canopy were removed. Also, the pop out display window beyond that is attached to the south wall was removed and covered with a plaster finished wall. Moving from south to north, between grid lines J and L the pop-out window display was removed and replaced by a plaster finished wall and fronted with a concrete platform and planters. Also, there is another pop-out window display that was covered with a plaster finished wall. Between grid lines R and S another pop-out window display was removed and a solid wall replaced a door opening into the display area and a white plaster wall finish was added to the flanking back walls of the display. Between grid lines R and W the colonnade and canopy cover were removed that connected the Macys and other westerly located mall buildings. Also removed were three pop-out display windows. New retail stores have been added to this portion of the Macys" building facade completely obscuring this wall. Therefore, 9 out of 14 Bays have been altered and 64% of this East fagade has been altered.