Conseil Économique Et Social Distr

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Conseil Économique Et Social Distr Nations Unies E/CN.6/2020/3 Conseil économique et social Distr. générale 13 janvier 2020 Français Original : anglais ? o k e n d a Commission de la condition de la femme Soixante-quatrième session 9-20 mars 2020 Point 3 a) de l’ordre du jour provisoire* Suite donnée à la quatrième Conférence mondiale sur les femmes et à la vingt-troisième session extraordinaire de l’Assemblée générale intitulée « Les femmes en l’an 2000 : égalité entre les sexes, développement et paix pour le XXIe siècle » Examen et évaluation des suites données à la Déclaration et au Programme d’action de Beijing et aux textes issus de la vingt-troisième session extraordinaire de l’Assemblée générale Rapport du Secrétaire général Résumé Le présent rapport, qui est soumis en application de la résolution 2018/8 du Conseil économique et social, consiste en un examen et en une évaluation des suites données à la Déclaration et au Programme d’action de Beijing et aux textes issus de la vingt-troisième session extraordinaire de l’Assemblée générale. On y trouvera une analyse du rôle que peuvent jouer l’égalité des genres et l’avancement des femmes dans l’application du Programme de développement durable à l’horizon 2030 et des difficultés rencontrées dans leur réalisation. Dans sa résolution, le Conseil économique et social a engagé tous les États à entreprendre à l’échelon national un examen d’ensemble des progrès accomplis et des difficultés rencontrées dans la mise en œuvre de la Déclaration et du Programme d’action de Beijing et des textes issus de la vingt-troisième session extraordinaire de l’Assemblée générale, et encouragé les commissions régionales à faire de même à l’échelon régional de façon que les résultats des processus intergouvernementaux régionaux puissent être intégrés à l’examen mondial. * E/CN.6/2020/1. 19-21893 (F) 060220 100220 *1921893* E/CN.6/2020/3 Table des matières Page I. Raviver la vision de Beijing pour atteindre les objectifs de développement durable ......... 3 II. L’examen et l’évaluation de l’application du Programme d’action ....................... 11 III. Progrès accomplis dans l’application du Programme d’action dans le cadre du Programme de développement durable à l’horizon 2030 ............................................ 14 A. Développement inclusif, prospérité partagée et travail décent ...................... 18 B. Élimination de la pauvreté, protection sociale et services sociaux ................... 35 C. Protection contre la violence, la stigmatisation et les stéréotypes ................... 58 D. Participation, respect du principe de responsabilité et institutions tenant compte des questions de genre .......................................................... 73 E. Sociétés pacifiques et inclusives .............................................. 87 F. Protection de l’environnement, action climatique et renforcement de la résilience ..... 102 IV. La voie à suivre : enseignements tirés et priorités pour une mise en œuvre accélérée du Programme d’action et du Programme 2030 ......................................... 117 Annexes I. Liens entre les domaines critiques énoncés dans le Programme d'action et les objectifs de développement durable .......................................................... 127 II. Taux de réponse au questionnaire, par région ........................................ 128 2/129 19-21893 E/CN.6/2020/3 I. Raviver la vision de Beijing pour atteindre les objectifs de développement durable 1. La Déclaration et le Programme d’action de Beijing ont été adoptés à la quatrième Conférence mondiale sur les femmes en 1995. Ils formaient ensemble un programme global et visionnaire qui avait pour but de faire de l’égalité des genres une réalité, d’assurer l’avancement des femmes et de permettre aux femmes et aux filles d’exercer leurs droits de la personne. Il s’agissait de lever les obstacles systémiques et structurels entravant l’exercice de leurs droits de la personne par les femmes et les filles dans les domaines social, économique, politique et environnemental, et de lancer des initiatives politiques pour concrétiser cette vision. Les États ont conclu que la redistribution du pouvoir et des ressources entre les femmes et les hommes dans les sphères publique et privée était inextricablement liée aux objectifs plus larges de la réalisation de l’égalité en général, de la durabilité et de l’avènement de sociétés pacifiques, inclusives et démocratiques. 2. La vision de Beijing a été réaffirmée en 2015, lorsque les États ont adopté le Programme de développement durable à l’horizon 2030, en se fondant sur les principes fondamentaux que sont les droits de la personne et l’égalité des genres et en se fixant des objectifs ambitieux : éradiquer la pauvreté, réduire les inégalités multiples et croisées, faire face aux changements climatiques, mettre fin aux conflits et pérenniser la paix. Le Programme 2030 a été établi en faisant fond sur le Programme d’action et il y a été souligné que, pour que le développement soit durable, ses avantages devaient profiter de manière égale aux femmes et aux hommes et que les droits des femmes ne deviendraient une réalité que dans le contexte plus large des efforts déployés pour protéger la planète et faire en sorte que toutes les personnes puissent vivre dans la dignité. A. La vision de Beijing n’a été que partiellement concrétisée 3. Le paysage mondial en ce qui concerne l’égalité des genres a considérablement évolué au cours des cinq dernières années. Le creusement des inégalités et l’exclusion économique sont le symptôme de modèles de développement dans lesquels les gains ne sont pas partagés de manière équitable. Face aux mouvements en faveur de l’égalité des genres, les manifestations de rejet gagnent en puissance. Le monde est également confronté à une crise climatique alimentée par la surexploitation des ressources naturelles. L’évolution rapide de la technique a des incidences sur tous les aspects de la vie économique, sociale et politique. Elle est porteuse aussi bien d’occasions à saisir que de risques. Dans le monde entier, les mouvements de femmes, jeunes féministes en tête, réclament haut et fort la justice économique, sociale et environnementale et des changements systémiques. De plus en plus de jeunes femmes instruites, qui sont des « natives du numérique », s’engagent de manière visible et active pour demander un avenir plus juste et durable. Cependant, la précarité de l’emploi et l’aggravation de l’insécurité économique les empêchent de réaliser leurs aspirations. 4. Depuis 2015, les États ont accéléré le rythme de la réforme et l’introduction de textes de loi, de politiques et de programmes permettant de faire progresser l’égalité des genres. À la lumière des rapports nationaux, il est possible de recenser certaines des grandes priorités des cinq dernières années dans le monde : • L’élimination de la violence à l’égard des femmes et des filles ; • L’accès aux soins de santé, y compris de santé sexuelle et procréative ; • La participation et la représentation politiques ; 19-21893 3/129 E/CN.6/2020/3 • Une éducation, une formation et un apprentissage tout au long de la vie de bonne qualité pour les femmes et les filles. Les priorités dans les régions en développement ont été les mêmes que celles recensées à l’échelle mondiale. Dans les régions développées, une plus grande attention a été accordée au droit des femmes de travailler et à leurs droits sur le lieu de travail, aux questions des soins non rémunérés et du travail ménager, à la conciliation de la vie professionnelle et de la vie familiale et aux efforts visant à faire évoluer les normes sociales négatives et à en finir avec les stéréotypes de genre. Les questions du renforcement de la participation des femmes à la durabilité environnementale, de la prise en compte du genre dans le cadre de la réduction des risques de catastrophe et de la promotion de la résilience, ainsi que celle de l’inclusion numérique et financière, sont celles qui ont reçu le moins d’attention à l’échelle mondiale. 5. De nouvelles orientations politiques et programmatiques se sont fait jour au cours des cinq dernières années : • Les trois quarts des États ont soit introduit des congés de maternité ou de paternité ou congés parentaux ou d’autres types de congé familial, soit renforcé les dispositions en vigueur dans ce domaine, conscients de la nécessité de s’attaquer au fardeau disproportionné que font peser sur les femmes les soins non rémunérés et le travail ménager. • Des programmes de protection sociale visant à éliminer la pauvreté parmi les femmes et les filles ont été adoptés ou renforcés dans 70 % des États. • Plus de la moitié des États pratiquent désormais une budgétisation tenant compte des questions de genre. • Des lois et règlements relatifs aux violences faites aux femmes et aux filles qui sont facilitées par la technique ont été adoptés ou renforcés dans plus de la moitié des États. L’accent y est surtout mis sur la lutte contre le harcèlement sexuel et un nombre restreint mais croissant d’États s’attaquent à la violence contre les femmes en politique. • En outre, le nombre de pays qui ont adopté des plans d’action nationaux sur les femmes et la paix et la sécurité a augmenté de 52 % depuis 2015. • Par ailleurs, 61 % des États encouragent le leadership et la participation des femmes à la gestion et à la gouvernance de l’environnement et des ressources naturelles. 6. Les lois à caractère discriminatoire continuent d’être abrogées : entre 2008 et 2017, 274 réformes juridiques concernant l’égalité des genres ont été menées dans 131 pays1. Aujourd’hui, les filles sont plus nombreuses que jamais à être scolarisées et davantage de pays ont atteint la parité des genres en matière de scolarisation (voir sect. III.B). Le taux mondial de mortalité maternelle est tombé de 342 décès maternels pour 100 000 naissances vivantes en 2000 à 211 pour 100 000 en 2017 (ibid.). Au cours de la dernière décennie, la proportion d’accouchements assistés par du personnel de santé qualifié a augmenté de 12 points de pourcentage (ibid.).
Recommended publications
  • Economic Policy, Childcare and the Unpaid Economy: Exploring Gender
    Economic Policy, Childcare and the Unpaid Economy: Exploring Gender Equality in Scotland Jecynta Amboh Azong Thesis submitted for the degree of a Doctor of Philosophy School of Applied Social Science University of Stirling 2015 Declaration I declare that none of the work contained within this thesis has been submitted for any other degree at any other university. The contents found herein have been composed by the candidate, Jecynta Amboh Azong. i Acknowledgements This work was jointly funded by the Scottish Government and the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) studentship. I am indebted to the late Professor Ailsa McKay who inspired but also believed in me to complete this work, though she passed on without having to see the person I grew up into. She was a great supervisor, friend and mentor. My gratitude goes to all my interview participants from the Scottish Government, the Scottish Parliament, Feminist and non-Feminist policy stakeholders and the UK data service for providing me with labour force data. I gratefully acknowledge my supervisors Dr. Alasdair Rutherford, Dr. Monika Wilinska and Professor Kirstein Rummery for their outstanding support throughout this process. I would like to thank my external supervisors Dr Ian Spencer from the Scottish Government and Dr. Angela O’Hagan from Glasgow Caledonian University for their support throughout this process and especially for helping facilitate access to interview participants. My sincere gratitude to Professor Diane Elson who took a keen interest in my work providing support and encouragement to ensure I was on the right track. Finally I want to thank my family and friends for their companionship and encouragement.
    [Show full text]
  • Politiche Di Contrasto Alla Povertà: Un’Analisi Degli Effetti Economici E Delle Ripercussioni Sociali
    Dipartimento di Scienze Sociali ed Economiche Sapienza Università di Roma Dottorato in “Ricerca Applicata nelle Scienze Sociali” - XXVI ciclo Coordinatore del Dottorato Prof. Guglielmo Chiodi Politiche di contrasto alla povertà: un’analisi degli effetti economici e delle ripercussioni sociali. Il caso di studio della Bolsa Famìlia in Brasile DOTTORANDA: LUDOVICA ROSSOTTI MATRICOLA 904905 Tutor: Co – Tutor: Prof. Carmelo Bruni Prof.ssa Mary Fraire Prof. Dario de Sousa e Silva Filho 2 Ai miei nipoti, Nicole e Matteo affinchè vedano il passato come un insegnamento il presente come un dono il futuro con speranza 3 4 Sommario Sommario ..................................................................................................................... 5 Indice tabelle ................................................................................................................. 8 Indice grafici .................................................................................................................. 9 Indice figure ................................................................................................................ 10 Indice fotografie……………………………………………………………………...…………7 Introduzione ................................................................................................................ 11 Cap. I La povertà e le misure per contrastarla ............................................................. 15 1.2 Come nasce la figura del povero ....................................................................... 16 1.3 I
    [Show full text]
  • Just Jobs Anita Bernstein Brooklyn Law School, [email protected]
    Brooklyn Law School BrooklynWorks Faculty Scholarship Spring 2016 Just Jobs Anita Bernstein Brooklyn Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/faculty Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Labor and Employment Law Commons, Other Law Commons, Sexuality and the Law Commons, and the Workers' Compensation Law Commons Recommended Citation U. Balt. L. Rev. 209 (2015-2016) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by BrooklynWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of BrooklynWorks. JUST JOBS Anita Bernstein* Activists who pursue gender justice in the United States have always focused on work, both the paid and unpaid kind. In her magisterial Sex Equality, Catharine MacKinnon chose "Work" as her first section, or illustrative locus, in the chapter titled "Sex and Sexism."' At the workplace, MacKinnon wrote, begins "the most- traveled terrain" of sex equality law.2 Unpaid work fills the waking hours of most women. Women's labor makes the domestic economies of nation-states possible, even though it continues almost entirely uncounted in measurements of national output.' Injustices in both categories of work, the paid and unpaid, buttress each other.4 Mindful of the undertakings and achievements of gender-justice activists in the realm of work, this Article adds to their task by proposing more for feminist law to do.' I will argue that feminist Anita and Stuart Subotnick Professor of Law, Brooklyn Law School. This Article benefited from stimulating discussion at the Eighth Annual Feminist Legal Theory Conference held at the University of Baltimore.
    [Show full text]
  • The Problem with Work
    THE PROBLEM WITH WORK A JOHN HOPE FRANKLIN CENTER BOOK THE PROBLEM WITH WORK Feminism, Marxism, Antiwork Politics, and Postwork Imaginaries KATHI WEEKS Duke University Press Durham and London 2011 © 2011 Duke University Press All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper co Designed by Heather Hensley Typeset in Minion Pro by Keystone Typesetting, Inc. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data appear on the last printed page of this book. THIS BOOK IS DEDICATED WITH LOVE TO Julie Walwick (1959-2010) Contents ix Acknowledgments INTRODUCTION i The Problem with Work CHAPTF1 i 37 Mapping the Work Ethic CHAPTER 2 79 Marxism, Productivism, and the Refusal of Work CHAPTER 3 113 Working Demands: From Wages for Housework to Basic Income CHAPTER 4 151 "Hours for What We Will": Work, Family, and the Demand for Shorter Hours CHAPTER 5 175 The Future Is Now: Utopian Demands and the Temporalities of Hope EPILOGUE 227 A Life beyond Work 235 Notes 255 References 275 Index Acknowledgments I would like to thank the following friends and colleagues for their helpful feedback on versions of these arguments and portions of the manuscript: Anne Allison, Courtney Berger, Tina Campt, Christine DiStefano, Greg Grandin, Judith Grant, Michael Hardt, Stefano Harney, Rebecca Karl, Ranji Khanna, Corey Robin, Kathy Rudy, Karen Stuhldreher, and Robyn Wiegman. Thanks also go to Rob- ert Adelman, Brittany Faullmer, Dennis Keenan, Marcie Patton, the Seattle FOJ, Julie Walwick, Cat Warren and David Auerbach, Diana Weeks, Lee Weeks, and Regan Weeks. An earlier version of a portion of chapter 2 was pub- lished as "The Refusal of Work as Demand and Perspec- tive' in Resistance in Practice: The Philosophy of Antonio Negri (Pluto Press, 2005), and a version of chapter 4 ap- peared as "'Hours for What We Will': Work, Family, and the Movement for Shorter Hours' in Feminist Studies 35, no.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconfiguring Basic Income's Feminist Potential Through the Lens of the State
    Chloe Halpenny A “State” of Possibility? Reconfiguring basic income’s feminist potential through the lens of the state Introduction “[It] was nice to get an income without having to jump through all the hoops that you have to jump through when you’re on [disability benefits] and all the rules you have to follow and all the fear that that engenders…where every time you get a brown envelope in the mail you’re afraid to open it because you’re just afraid, what’s this going to be. Is it going to be bad news?”– Veronica, Ontario Basic Income Pilot Participant In early 2018, the first of what would be over 4,000 individuals – one of whom was Veronica – across Ontario, Canada began receiving money as part of the Ontario Basic Income Pilot (Ministry of Children, Community and Social Services, 2017). Initiated and implemented by the former Liberal provincial government, the pilot provided participants with an annual income of up to $16,989, less 50% of any earned income and with an additional $500 monthly top-up for people with disabilities (Ministry of Children, Community and Social Services, 2017). Piloted in three sites across the province with the aim of gathering data on a novel approach to sustainable poverty reduction, the intended three-year program’s premature cancellation was announced after a change of government in July 2018, with the final payments administered in March 2019 (Ministry of Children, Community and Social Services, 2017; Kovach, 2018). Globally, reactions from the basic income community were immediate and damning, criticizing the cancellation as invoking harm on participants while undermining what many perceived to be a “golden research opportunity” (McFarland, 2018; Mulvale, 2018).
    [Show full text]
  • CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES on FINANCIAL and ECONOMIC CRISES: HETERODOX MACROECONOMICS MEETS FEMINIST ECONOMICS Sakiko Fukuda-Parr, Ja
    Feminist Economics, 2013 Vol. 19, No. 3, 4-31, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2013.806990 CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC CRISES: HETERODOX MACROECONOMICS MEETS FEMINIST ECONOMICS Sakiko Fukuda-Parr, James Heintz, and Stephanie Seguino' ABSTRACT This contribution brings together various strands of analysis about the causes, consequences, and policy ramifications of economic crises, with a specific focus on distributional dynamics. It aims to facilitate a conversation between macroeconomic theorists of crises and instability and feminist economists and scholars of intergroup inequality. Macroeconomic analyses of the Great Recession have centered on the causal role of financial deregulation, capital flow imbalances, and growth of income and wealth inequality. That work tends to be divorced from research that analyzes broader distributional impacts, prior to the crisis and subsequently, transmitted through economic channels and government responses. This study's framework emphasizes the role of stratification along multiple trajectories - race, class, and gender - in contributing to economic crises and in shaping their distributional dynamics. The study underscores the long-run effects of the 2008 crisis on well-being, highlighted in feminist economists' research on social reproduction and often missed in the macroeconomics literature. KEYWORDS Stratification, financialization, macroeconomics, crisis JEL Codes: Z13, B54, E44 INTRODUCTION: THE UNHAPPY COLLISION OF ECONOMIC CRISIS AND INEQUALITY Periodic crisis is a feature of capitalist economies, long noted by Marx, Keynes, Minsky, Kindleberger, and a plethora of heterodox economists. So, too, is the reproduction of intergroup inequality, whether by race, gender, or class. The large number of economic crises over the past several decades - originating in both developed and developing countries - has © 2013 IAFFE HETERODOX AND FEMINIST PERSPECTIVES ON CRISES weighed more heavily on economically and socially subordinate groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Reddito Garantito Una Leva Per Il Cambiamento
    Roma 9 e 10 giugno 2011. Atti del Meeting e c i l p m e s , e t n a m r a s i d , a l l e B l’utopia concreta del Reddito Garantito 1 1 Associazione Bin Italia Via apollodoro 4 0053 Civitavecchia Roma www.bin-italia.org [email protected] Hanno curato la raccolta degli atti: Sandro Gobetti coordinamento ed impaginazione Sabrina Del Pico traduzioni Con il contributo della Provincia di Roma Finito di stampare a Roma nel mese di ottobre 2011 Indice Introduzione di Luca Santini 6 La Tavola rotonda. Le relazioni e gli interventi 8 Argomentazioni a favore del basic income. Clause Offe 9 Il precariato: da denizen a cittadino? Guy Standing 17 Tagli della crisi e cittadinanza: Il reddito minimo garantito universale. Ailsa Mckay 36 Basic income: la strada per ricostruire il sistema di protezione sociale. Alcune riflessioni dall’America Latina. Rubén M. Lo Vuolo 43 Il reddito garantito una leva per il cambiamento. Intervento di Massimiliano Smeriglio 49 L’utopia concreta del reddito garantito. Luigi Ferrajoli 53 64 I tavoli di lavoro. I documenti preparatori Welfare, diritti del lavoro, reddito garantito 65 67 Il diritto al reddito garantito come diritto fondamentale europeo 69 Finanziare il reddito è possibile Il documento finale del meeting 70 Introduzione Luca Santini, Presidente del Bin-Italia Scopo costitutivo del Bin-Italia è stato sin dall’inizio, quello di raccogliere le sensibilità, le mobilitazioni, le competenze di ognuno e il dibattito accumulati nel corso del tempo sul tema del reddito garantito con l’intenzione di dare loro una maggiore visibilità, una veste organizzata, una maggiore capacità di incidere in ambiti nuovi della politica, dell’acca- demia, del dibattito culturale, nella società.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti/Postwork Feminist Politics and a Case for Basic Income
    tripleC 18 (2): 575-594, 2020 http://www.triple-c.at Anti/Postwork Feminist Politics and a Case for Basic Income Kathi Weeks Duke University, Durham, NC, USA, [email protected] Abstract: This article presents a defence of the demand for a guaranteed basic income against recent Left critiques. Drawing on a series of lessons from the 1970s-era demand for Wages for Housework, I argue in favour of a demand for a liveable and universal basic income as a coalitional, antiproductivist, antifamilial reform that can help to alleviate some of the ways that the current wage-and-family system miscounts our economic contributions and fails as a sys- tem of income distribution. Keywords: basic income, domestic labour, Wages for Housework, Marxist feminism, antiwork, postwork, antiproductivism, antifamilialism, autonomy. Acknowledgements: I am grateful to participants at the following venues for lively, challeng- ing, and comradely debate about many of these ideas: Cornell Society for the Humanities Fellows Seminar in 2020, the 2019 conference sponsored by CHASE and Autonomy on Chal- lenging the Work Society: An Interdisciplinary Summit, and the Future of Work panel at the 2018 NWSA meeting. Thanks also to Katie Cruz and Cameron Thibos for help in formulating some of these arguments. 1. Introduction Once treated as either a dangerously delusional fantasy or, occasionally, a naïvely distracting caprice, the demand for a guaranteed basic income in the US is now being debated across multiple forums, from mainstream and alternative media sites to more academic
    [Show full text]
  • Juliet Rhys-Williams and the Campaign for Basic Income, 1942-55
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Apollo Beveridge’s rival: Juliet Rhys-Williams and the campaign for basic income, 1942-55 Peter Sloman, New College, Oxford Postal address: New College, Oxford, OX1 3BN Email: [email protected] Telephone: 07787 114629 Abstract: Historians of Britain’s post-war welfare state have long been aware of the shortcomings of the social insurance model, but the political impact of the Beveridge report has tended to obscure the alternative visions of welfare canvassed in the 1940s and 1950s. This article examines the social activist Juliet Rhys-Williams’ campaign for the integration of the tax and benefit systems and the provision of a universal basic income, which attracted wide interest from economists, journalists, and Liberal and Conservative politicians during and after the Second World War. Though Rhys-Williams’ proposals were not adopted, they helped establish a distinctive ‘social market’ perspective on welfare provision which has become central to British social policy debates since the 1960s and 1970s. Acknowledgements: I would like to thank Ben Jackson, Taku Eriguchi, Bill Jordan, Philippe van Parijs, and Malcolm Torry for helpful comments on earlier versions of this article. I am also grateful for valuable feedback from participants at the Women in British Politics conference at the University of Lincoln in May 2011 and the Modern British History seminar at the University of Oxford in January 2015, and from the anonymous Contemporary British History reviewers. 1 Beveridge’s rival: Juliet Rhys-Williams and the campaign for basic income, 1942-55 Historians of the development of Britain’s post-war welfare state have long been aware that they are dealing with a paradox.
    [Show full text]
  • ALMAZ ZELLEKE Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. Phd in Political Science, 2008
    ALMAZ ZELLEKE Global Post-Doctoral Fellow and Coordinator of Global Planning NYU Shanghai 1555 Century Avenue Pudong, Shanghai, PRC 200122 +86-021-2059-5066 [email protected] almazzelleke.com EDUCATION Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. PhD in Political Science, 2008; A.M. in Political Science, 1991. Dissertation: Radical Pluralism: Arguments for an Unconditional Basic Income in the United States. Princeton University, Princeton, NJ. A.B. in Politics, 1984. FELLOWSHIPS AND AWARDS Ford Foundation Predoctoral Fellowship, 1988 (three-year grant). Harvard Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Prize Fellowship, 1988 (five-year grant). Harvard University Center for European Studies Grant, 1991 (summer grant). MANUSCRIPT IN PROGRESS “Money for Nothing,” book-length manuscript in progress on the argument for an unconditional basic income in the United States. BOOK CHAPTERS “Basic Income and the Alaska Model: Limits of the Resource Dividend Model for the Implementation of an Unconditional Basic Income,” in Karl Widerquist and Michael W. Howard, eds., Alaska’s Permanent Fund Dividend: Examining its Suitability as a Model (Palgrave Macmillan, 2012), pp. 141-55. “The Capitalist Road to Communism: Are We There Yet?” in Axel Gosseries and Yannick Vanderborght, eds., Arguing about justice: Essays for Philippe Van Parijs (Louvain, Belgium: Presses Universitaires de Louvain, 2011), pp. 415-22. “Basic Income in the United States: Redefining Citizenship in the Liberal State,” in Karl Widerquist, Michael A. Lewis, and Steven Pressman, eds., The Ethics and Economics of the Basic Income Guarantee (Ashgate, 2005). REFEREED ARTICLES “Feminist Political Theory and the Argument for an Unconditional Basic Income,” Policy and Politics, vol. 39, no. 1 (January 2011), pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Response to Lindsey Macdonald's “We Are All
    Tai Neilson, "Response to Lindsey Macdonald's 'We are All Housewives: Universal Basic Income as Wages for Housework'," Lateral 8.1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.25158/L8.1.9 This content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyright is retained by authors. Forum: Universal Basic Income Issue 8.1 (Spring 2019) Response to Lindsey Macdonald’s “We are All Housewives: Universal Basic Income as Wages for Housework” Tai Neilson ABSTRACT What types of subjectivities and political actors are emerging around calls for UBI? Lindsey Macdonald’s article, “We Are All Housewives,” eloquently speaks to the concept of universality, while also situating socialist-feminist demands for UBI within specic activist traditions. I pose questions about the distinctions between different socialist arguments for UBI and the political groups that advocate for its implementation: rst, what are the differences between autonomist and feminist proposals; and, second, how might we distinguish and evaluate organizations that are ghting for a feminist-socialist UBI? I appreciate being invited to take part in this forum on universal basic income (UBI) and to respond to Lindsey Macdonald’s article.1 The Marxist approaches developed by the authors are diverse and compelling, and I’ll engage them within this framework. My entry into debates surrounding UBI has, for the most part, come from Marxist autonomist work on labor and technology. There are signicant overlaps between feminist and autonomist approaches (Silvia Federici’s writing and activism are obvious examples2). Macdonald’s article provides an opportunity to think through these different arguments for UBI, and consider the particularity and universality of feminist approaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    Contents About the Editors xi Introduction: The Idea of an Unconditional Income for Everyone xiii Karl Widerquist, Yannick Vanderborght, José A. Noguera, and Jurgen De Wispelaere Part I: Freedom 1 Introduction: Freedom and Basic Income 2 Karl Widerquist 1. The Psychological Aspects of the Guaranteed Income 5 Erich Fromm 2. The Case for a Negative Income Tax: A View from the Right 11 Milton Friedman 3. Why Surfers Should Be Fed: The Crazy-Lazy Challenge 17 Philippe Van Parijs 4. Optional Freedoms 23 Elizabeth Anderson 5. A Republican Right to Basic Income 26 Philip Pettit 6. Why We Demand a Basic Income 32 Karl WiderquistCOPYRIGHTED MATERIAL Part II: Justice 39 Introduction: Theories of Justice and Basic Income 40 Karl Widerquist 7. Left-libertarianism and a Global Rent Payment 43 Nicolaus Tideman and Peter Vallentyne 8. Guaranteed Income as a Replacement for the Welfare State 49 Charles Murray vi Contents 9. A Capitalist Road to Communism 52 Robert van der Veen and Philippe Van Parijs 10. Why Marxists and Socialists Should Favor Basic Income 55 Michael Howard 11. Basic Income and the Common Good 62 Bill Jordan 12. Associations and Basic Income 72 Bill Jordan Part III: Reciprocity and Exploitation 79 Introduction: Reciprocity and Exploitation 80 Karl Widerquist 13. Brief Comments on Leisure Time 85 John Rawls 14. Liberal Equality, Exploitation, and the Case for an Unconditional Basic Income 87 Stuart White 15. Clamshell Rents? How Resource Equality Causes Exploitation 93 Gijs Van Donselaar 16. Basic Income and the Work Ethic 101 Brian Barry 17. Fairness to Idleness: Is There a Right Not to Work? 105 Andrew Levine 18.
    [Show full text]