Competition, State Aids and Subsidies 2010

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Competition, State Aids and Subsidies 2010 Competition, State Aids and Subsidies 2010 The OECD Global Forum on Competition debated Competition, State aids and Subsidies in February 2010. This document includes an executive summary of the debate and the meeting’s documentation: an analytical note by Mr. David Spector for the OECD Secretariat, written submissions from Argentina, Croatia, Egypt, the European Union, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, India, Jordan, Lithuania, Mongolia, Morocco, Pakistan, Peru, Poland, Romania, the Russian Federation, Senegal, Spain, Chinese Taipei, Ukraine, the United States, BIAC as well as a Keynote Speech by the EU Competition Commissioner, contributions from several experts and an aide-memoire of the discussion. State aids and subsidies represent a significant amount of public funds and governments grant subsidies in a multiplicity of ways. However, a large heterogeneity exists among systems of control, both at the supranational and national levels. The actual impact of state aids and subsidies is difficult to assess. On the one hand, they may cause distortions and inefficiencies. On the other hand they are frequently rationalised as an instrument to tackle market failures and to produce positive externalities. To improve the assessment of state aids and subsidies measures, governments should adopt general screening ex ante and limiting criteria. Ex post assessment mechanisms should also be put in place in order to limit their negative impact. Furthermore, competition authorities should hold state-owned enterprises and government agencies to the same standards as private companies regarding the control of anticompetitive behaviour. Finally, advocacy by competition authorities to other parts of the Government should also contribute to keeping the granting of state aids in check. Competition Policy, Industrial Policy and National Champions (2009) Competition and Financial Markets (2009) State-Owned Enterprises and the Principle of Competitive Neutrality (2009) Concessions (2006) Unclassified DAF/COMP/GF(2010)5 Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 19-May-2011 ___________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________ English, French DIRECTORATE FOR FINANCIAL AND ENTERPRISE AFFAIRS COMPETITION COMMITTEE Unclassified DAF/COMP/GF(2010)5 Global Forum on Competition ROUNDTABLE ON COMPETITION, STATE AIDS AND SUBSIDIES English, French JT03302066 Document complet disponible sur OLIS dans son format d'origine Complete document available on OLIS in its original format DAF/COMP/GF(2010)5 FOREWORD This document comprises proceedings in the original languages of a Roundtable on Competition, State Aids and Subsidies, held by the Global Forum on Competition in February 2010. It is published under the responsibility of the Secretary General of the OECD to bring information on this topic to the attention of a wider audience. This compilation is one of a series of publications entitled "Competition Policy Roundtables". PRÉFACE Ce document rassemble la documentation dans la langue d'origine dans laquelle elle a été soumise, relative à une table ronde sur Concurrence, aides publiques et subventions qui s'est tenue en février 2010 dans le cadre du Forum mondial sur la concurrence. Il est publié sous la responsabilité du Secrétaire général de l'OCDE, afin de porter à la connaissance d'un large public les éléments d'information qui ont été réunis à cette occasion. Cette compilation fait partie de la série intitulée "Les tables rondes sur la politique de la concurrence". Visit our Internet Site -- Consultez notre site Internet http://www.oecd.org/competition 2 DAF/COMP/GF(2010)5 OTHER TITLES SERIES ROUNDTABLES ON COMPETITION POLICY 1. Competition Policy and Environment OCDE/GD(96)22 2. Failing Firm Defence OCDE/GD(96)23 3. Competition Policy and Film Distribution OCDE/GD(96)60 4. Competition Policy and Efficiency Claims in Horizontal Agreements OCDE/GD(96)65 5. The Essential Facilities Concept OCDE/GD(96)113 6. Competition in Telecommunications OCDE/GD(96)114 7. The Reform of International Satellite Organisations OCDE/GD(96)123 8. Abuse of Dominance and Monopolisation OCDE/GD(96)131 9. Application of Competition Policy to High Tech Markets OCDE/GD(97)44 10. General Cartel Bans: Criteria for Exemption for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises OCDE/GD(97)53 11. Competition Issues related to Sports OCDE/GD(97)128 12. Application of Competition Policy to the Electricity Sector OCDE/GD(97)132 13. Judicial Enforcement of Competition Law OCDE/GD(97)200 14. Resale Price Maintenance OCDE/GD(97)229 15. Railways: Structure, Regulation and Competition Policy DAFFE/CLP(98)1 16. Competition Policy and International Airport Services DAFFE/CLP(98)3 17. Enhancing the Role of Competition in the Regulation of Banks DAFFE/CLP(98)16 18. Competition Policy and Intellectual Property Rights DAFFE/CLP(98)18 19. Competition and Related Regulation Issues in the Insurance Industry DAFFE/CLP(98)20 20. Competition Policy and Procurement Markets DAFFE/CLP(99)3 21. Regulation and Competition Issues in Broadcasting in the light of Convergence DAFFE/CLP(99)1 22. Relationship between Regulators and Competition Authorities DAFFE/CLP(99)8 23. Buying Power of Multiproduct Retailers DAFFE/CLP(99)21 24. Promoting Competition in Postal Services DAFFE/CLP(99)22 25. Oligopoly DAFFE/CLP(99)25 26. Airline Mergers and Alliances DAFFE/CLP(2000)1 27. Competition in Professional Services DAFFE/CLP(2000)2 28. Competition in Local Services DAFFE/CLP(2000)13 29. Mergers in Financial Services DAFFE/CLP(2000)17 30. Promoting Competition in the Natural Gas Industry DAFFE/CLP(2000)18 31. Competition Issues in Electronic Commerce DAFFE/CLP(2000)32 32. Competition and Regulation Issues in the Pharmaceutical Industry DAFFE/CLP(2000)29 3 DAF/COMP/GF(2010)5 33. Competition Issues in Joint Ventures DAFFE/CLP(2000)33 34. Competition Issues in Road Transport DAFFE/CLP(2001)10 35. Price Transparency DAFFE/CLP(2001)22 36. Competition Policy in Subsidies and State Aid DAFFE/CLP(2001)24 37. Portfolio Effects in Conglomerate Mergers DAFFE/COMP(2002)5 38. Competition and Regulation Issues in Telecommunications DAFFE/COMP(2002)6 39. Merger Review in Emerging High Innovation Markets DAFFE/COMP(2002)20 40. Loyalty and Fidelity Discounts and Rebates DAFFE/COMP(2002)21 41. Communication by Competition Authorities DAFFE/COMP(2003)4 42. Substantive Criteria used for the Assessment of Mergers DAFFE/COMP(2003)5 43. Competition Issues in the Electricity Sector DAFFE/COMP(2003)14 44. Media Mergers DAFFE/COMP(2003)16 45. Non Commercial Services Obligations and Liberalisation DAFFE/COMP(2004)19 46. Competition and Regulation in the Water Sector DAFFE/COMP(2004)20 47. Regulating Market Activities by Public Sector DAF/COMP(2004)36 48. Merger Remedies DAF/COMP(2004)21 49. Cartels: Sanctions against Individuals DAF/COMP(2004)39 50. Intellectual Property Rights DAF/COMP(2004)24 51. Predatory Foreclosure DAF/COMP(2005)14 52. Competition and Regulation in Agriculture: Monopsony Buying and Joint Selling DAF/COMP(2005)44 53. Enhancing Beneficial Competition in the Health Professions DAF/COMP(2005)45 54. Evaluation of the Actions and Resources of Competition Authorities DAF/COMP(2005)30 55. Structural Reform in the Rail Industry DAF/COMP(2005)46 56. Competition on the Merits DAF/COMP(2005)27 57. Resale Below Cost Laws and Regulations DAF/COMP(2005)43 58. Barriers to Entry DAF/COMP(2005)42 59. Prosecuting Cartels without Direct Evidence of Agreement DAF/COMP/GF(2006)7 60. The Impact of Substitute Services on Regulation DAF/COMP(2006)18 61. Competition in the Provision of Hospital Services DAF/COMP(2006)20 62. Access to key Transport Facilities DAF/COMP(2006)29 63. Environmental Regulation and Competition DAF/COMP(2006)30 64. Concessions DAF/COMP/GF(2006)6 65. Remedies and Sanctions DAF/COMP(2006)19 66. Competition in Bidding Markets DAF/COMP(2006)31 67. Competition and Efficient Usage of Payment cards DAF/COMP(2006)32 68. Vertical mergers DAF/COMP(2007)21 69. Competition and Regulation in Retail Banking DAF/COMP(2006)33 70. Improving Competition in Real Estate Transactions DAF/COMP(2007)36 71. Public Procurement – The Role of Competition Authorities in Promoting Competition DAF/COMP(2007)34 4 DAF/COMP/GF(2010)5 72. Competition, Patents and Innovation DAF/COMP(2007)40 73. Private Remedies DAF/COMP(2006)34 74. Energy Security and Competition Policy DAF/COMP(2007)35 75. Plea Bargaining Settlement of Cartel Cases DAF/COMP(2007)38 76. Competitive Restrictions in Legal Professions DAF/COMP(2007)39 77. Dynamic Efficiencies in Merger Analysis DAF/COMP(2007)41 78. Guidance to Business on Monopolisation and Abuse of Dominance DAF/COMP(2007)43 79. The Interface between Competition and Consumer Policies DAF/COMP/GF(2008)10 80. Facilitating Practices in Oligopolies DAF/COMP(2008)24 81. Taxi Services Regulation and Competition DAF/COMP(2007)42 82. Techniques and Evidentiary Issues in Proving Dominance/ Monopoly Power DAF/COMP(2006)35 83. Managing Complex Merger Cases DAF/COMP(2007)44 84. Potential Pro-Competitive and Anti-Competitive Aspects of Trade/Business Associations DAF/COMP(2007)45 85. Market Studies DAF/COMP(2008)34 86. Land Use Restrictions as Barriers to Entry DAF/COMP(2008)25 87. Construction Industry DAF/COMP(2008)36 88. Antitrust Issues Involving Minority Shareholding and DAF/COMP(2008)30 Interlocking Directorates 89. Bundled and Loyalty Discounts and Rebates DAF/COMP(2008)29 90. Techniques for Presenting Complex Economic Theories to Judges DAF/COMP(2008)31 91. Competition Policy for Vertical Relations in Gasoline Retailing DAF/COMP(2008)35 92. Competition and Financial Markets DAF/COMP(2009)11 93. Refusals to Deal DAF/COMP(2007)46 94. Resale Price Maintenance DAF/COMP(2008)37 95. Experience with Direct Settlements in Cartel Cases DAF/COMP(2008)32 96. Competition Policy, Industrial Policy and National Champions DAF/COMP/GF(2009)9 97. Two-Sided Markets DAF/COMP(2009)20 98. Monopsony and Buyer Power DAF/COMP(2008)38 99.
Recommended publications
  • AGRICULTURE POLICY in INDIA: the ROLE of INPUT SUBSIDIES -Nick Grossman ([email protected]) and Dylan Carlson ([email protected])
    USITC Executive Briefings on Trade March 2011 AGRICULTURE POLICY IN INDIA: THE ROLE OF INPUT SUBSIDIES -Nick Grossman ([email protected]) and Dylan Carlson ([email protected]) In India, agricultural trade policy is a part of a larger food and agriculture policy regime that seeks to maintain food self-sufficiency while providing income support to the agricultural sector and poor consumers. The Government of India (GOI) uses a variety of policy instruments in attempting to achieve these goals, including: Domestic subsidies to inputs, outputs, transportation, storage, and consumption to reduce producer costs and consumer prices. Border measures such as subsidies, tariffs, quotas, and non-tariff measures to protect domestic producers from import competition, manage domestic price levels, and guarantee domestic supply. Input subsidies are the most expensive aspect of India’s food and agriculture policy regime, requiring a steadily larger budget share. India subsidizes agricultural inputs in an attempt to keep farm costs low and production high. GOI’s intended result is for farmers to benefit from lower costs, but also for them to pass some of the savings on to the consumers in the form of lower food prices. GOI pays fertilizer producers directly in exchange for the companies selling fertilizer at lower than market prices. Irrigation and electricity, on the other hand, are supplied directly to farmers by GOI at prices that are below the cost of production. These policies result in effective subsidies to the farmer of 40 to 75 percent for fertilizer and 70 to 90 percent for irrigation and electricity. Input subsidies can also produce unintended effects.
    [Show full text]
  • Redesigning India's Urea Policy
    Redesigning India’s urea policy Sid Ravinutala MPA/ID Candidate 2016 in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Public Administration in International Development, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. Advisor: Martin Rotemberg Section Leader: Michael Walton ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank Arvind Subramanian, Chief Economic Adviser, Government of India for the opportunity to work on this issue as part of his team. Credit for the demand-side solution presented at the end goes to Nandan Nilekani, who casually dropped it while in a car ride, and of course to Arvind for encouraging me to pursue it. Credit for the supply-side solution goes to Arvind, who from the start believed that decanalization throttles efficiency in the market. He has motivated a lot of the analysis presented here. I would also like to thank the rest of the members of ‘team CEA’. We worked on fertilizer policy together and they helped me better understand the issues, the people, and the data. The analyses of domestic firms and the size and regressivity of the black market were done by other members of the team (Sutirtha, Shoumitro, and Kapil) and all credit goes to them. Finally, I want to thank my wife, Mara Horwitz, and friend and colleague Siddharth George for reviewing various parts and providing edits and critical feedback. Finally, I would like to thank Michael Walton and Martin Rotemberg for providing insightful feedback and guidance as I narrowed my policy questions and weighed possible solutions. I also had the opportunity to contribute to the chapter on fertilizer policy in India’s 2016 Economic Survey.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Includes Inputs from Prof
    Action PlAn for Green BudGetinG in PunjAB Concepts, Rationale and Ways Forward The Energy and Resources Institute Project support: Department of Science Technology and Environment, Government of Punjab © The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI) and Punjab State Council for Science and Technology (PSCST) Disclaimer All rights reserved. Any part of this publication may be quoted, copied, or translated by indicating the source. The analysis and policy recommendations of the book do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding organizations or entities associated with them. Suggested Citation PSCST-TERI. (2014). Action Plan for Green Budgeting in Punjab: Concepts, Rationale and Ways Forward. The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI) and Punjab State Council for Science and Technology (PSCST). Supported by Department of Science, Technology and Environment, Government of Punjab. The Cover The exhibit on the cover page is metaphorical depiction of a pot with a flowering plant. The picture attempts to communicate how a proactive mind-set could lead to to activities contributing to environmental sustainability through enhanced allocation of public finance. Project Action Plan for Green Budget for Punjab Document Name Action Plan for Green Budgeting in Punjab: Concepts, Rationale and Ways Forward Project Support Department of Science Technology and Environment, Government of Punjab Nodal Agency Punjab State Council for Science and Technology (PSCST), Chandigarh Research Organization The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI), Delhi Project
    [Show full text]
  • Electricity in India
    prepa india 21/02/02 12:14 Page 1 INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY ELECTRICITY IN INDIA Providing Power for the Millions INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY ELECTRICITY IN INDIA Providing Power for the Millions INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATION FOR ENERGY AGENCY ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION 9, rue de la Fédération, AND DEVELOPMENT 75739 Paris, cedex 15, France The International Energy Agency (IEA) is an Pursuant to Article 1 of the Convention signed in autonomous body which was established in Paris on 14th December 1960, and which came November 1974 within the framework of the into force on 30th September 1961, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) to implement an Development (OECD) shall promote policies international energy programme. designed: It carries out a comprehensive programme of • To achieve the highest sustainable economic energy co-operation among twenty-six* of the growth and employment and a rising standard OECD’s thirty Member countries. The of living in Member countries, while maintaining basic aims of the IEA are: financial stability, and thus to contribute to the development of the world economy; • To maintain and improve systems for coping • To contribute to sound economic expansion in with oil supply disruptions; Member as well as non-member countries in • To promote rational energy policies in a global the process of economic development; and context through co-operative relations with • To contribute to the expansion of world trade non-member countries, industry and on
    [Show full text]
  • 4. Subsidies an All India Perspective
    Subsidies: An All-India Perspective An all-India perspective on the extent of subsidies can be provided by putting together subsidy estimates for the Centre and the States. In the ensuing discussion, estimates of budget-based subsidies for the Centre and the States taken together are discussed first, in terms of their overall magnitudes, relative shares of the Centre and the States, the recovery rates and the sectoral shares. A comparison of the major findings for 1994-95 is then made with the previous estimates of subsidies pertaining to 1987-88 and 1992-93. In this chapter, some of the major subsidies in India, like those relating to power, irrigation, health, education and petroleum products are also discussed individually. Centre and States: Aggregate Budget-Based Subsidies An estimate of subsidies emanating from the Central government budget was given in Chapter 2 for 1994-95, while that for the States, as projected on the basis of estimates for 15 major States (1993-94), and four special category States (1994-95) was provided in Chapter 3. An all-India estimate of budget-based subsidies can be obtained by adding the Central and State government subsidies. a. All-India Profile The all-India profile of subsidies is presented in Table 4.1. In 1994-95, aggregate government subsidies (Centre and States) amounted to Rs. 136844 crore, constituting 14.35 per cent of GDP at market prices in that year. Out of this aggregate subsidy, merit subsidies accounted for 23.84 per cent and non-merit subsidies 76.16 per cent, amounting to 3.42 and 10.93 per cent of GDP respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Hist of India Under Early British Rule
    The Economic History of India Under Early British Rule FROM THE RISE OF THE BRITISH POWER IN 1757 TO THE ACCESSION OF QUEEN VICTORIA IN 1837 ROMESH DUTT, C.I.E. VOLUME 1 First published in Great Britain by Kegan Paul, Trench, Triibner, 1902 CONTENTS PAGE PREFACE . r . vii CHAP. I. GROWTH OF THE EMPIRE I I e ocI 111. LORD CLlVE AND RIS SUCCESSORS IN BEXGAL, 1765-72 . 35 V. LORD CORNWALLIS AND THE ZEMINDARI SETTLEMENT IN BENGAL, 1785-93 . 81 VI. FARMING OF REVESUES IN MADRAS, 1763-85 . VJI. OLD AND NEW POSSESSIONS IN MADRAS, I 785-1807 VIII. VILLAGE COMMUNITIES OR INDIVIDUAL TENANTS? A DEBATE IN MADRAS, 1807-20. IX. MUNRO AND THE RYOTWARI SETTLEMENT IN MADRAS, 1820-27 . X. LORD WELLESLEY AND CONQUESTS IN NORTHERN INDIA, 1795-1815 . XI. LORD HASTINGS AND THE MAHALWARI SETTLEMENT IN NORTHERN INDIA, 1815-22 . XII. ECONOMIC CONDITIOR OF SOUTHERN INDIA, 1800 . X~II. ECONOMlC CONDITION OF KORTHERN INDIA, 1808-15 Printed in Great Britain XIv. DECLINE OF INDUSTRIES, 1793-1813 . xv. STATE OF INDUSTRIE~, 1813-35 . • ~VI.EXTERNAL TRADE, 1813-35 a . vi CONTENTS PAGE CHAP. XVII. INTERNAL TRADE, CANALS AND RAILROADS, 1813-35 . 303 XVIII. ADMINISTRATIVE FAILURES,I 793-18 15 . 313 XIX. ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS AND LORD WILLIAM DENTINCK, 1815-35 . 326 PREFACE XX. ELPHINSTONE IN BOMBAT, 1817-27 344 EXCELLENTworks on the military and political transac- XXI. WINGATE AXD THE RYOTIVARI SETTLEMENT IN tions of the British in India have been written by BOMBAY,1827-35 368 . eminent hi~t~orians.No history of the people of India, XXII.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Finance
    CHAPTER 5 PUBLIC FINANCE 5.1 The macroeconomic environment has been under stress since 2008-09 when the global economic and financial crisis unfolded, necessitating rapid calibration of policies. Fiscal expansion that followed in 2008-09 and 2009-10 did yield macroeconomic dividends in the form of a sharp recovery in 2009-10, which stabilized in 2010-11. However, the continuance of the expansion well into 2010-11 had macroeconomic implications of higher inflation, which necessitated a tightening of monetary policy and gradually led to a slowdown in investments and GDP growth that resulted in a feedback loop to public finances through lower revenues. Consequently fiscal consolidation has to be effected through limits on expenditure, which are carried out at RE (revised estimates) stage. The fiscal targets in 2012-13 were achieved by counterbalancing the decline in tax revenue, mainly on account of economic slowdown, with higher expenditure rationalization and compression. 5.2 The budget of the Union government has huge impact on the economy of the country as a whole. Due to its sheer size, as reflected in high magnitude of receipts and expenditure of Government and various policy prescriptions articulated through the Budget, it can be easily considered to be the prime mover of the growth trajectory of the economy. The Budget for 2013-14, which was presented against the backdrop of the lowest GDP growth rate for the Indian economy in a decade and persisting uncertainty in the global economic environment, sought to create economic space and find resources for achieving the objective of inclusive development within the overarching framework of fiscal consolidation.
    [Show full text]
  • Trade-Related Subsidies – Bridging the North-South Divide an Indian Perspective
    Trade-Related Subsidies – Bridging the North-South Divide An Indian Perspective Meeta K Mehra, Fellow; Mayank Sinha, Research Associate; and Sohini Sahu, Research Associate The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI) The International Institute for Sustainable Development contributes to sustainable development by advancing policy recommendations on international trade and investment, economic policy, climate change, measurement and indicators, and natural resources management. By using Internet communications, we report on international negotiations and broker knowledge gained through collaborative projects with global partners, resulting in more rigorous research, capacity building in developing countries and better dialogue between North and South. IISD’s vision is better living for all—sustainably; its mission is to champion innovation, enabling societies to live sustainably. IISD receives operating grant support from the Government of Canada, provided through the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) and Environment Canada, and from the Province of Manitoba. The institute receives project funding from the Government of Canada, the Province of Manitoba, other national governments, United Nations agencies, foundations and the private sector. IISD is registered as a charitable organization in Canada and has 501(c)(3) status in the United States. Copyright © 2004 International Institute for Sustainable Development Published by the International Institute for Sustainable Development All rights reserved International Institute
    [Show full text]
  • IISD GSI Measuring Irrigation Subsidies
    Measuring Irrigation Subsidies in Andhra Pradesh and Southern India: An application of the GSI Method for quantifying subsidies FEBRUARY 2011 BY: K. Palanisami IWMI-TATA Water Policy Research Programme IWMI –South Asia Regional Office Kadiri Mohan IWMI-TATA Water Policy Research Programme IWMI –South Asia Regional Office Mark Giordano International Water Management Institute Colombo Chris Charles Global Subsidies Initiative (GSI) International Institute for Sustainable Development For the Global Subsidies Initiative (GSI) of the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) Geneva, Switzerland www.globalsubsidies.org THE GLOBAL SUBSIDIES INITIATIVE MEASURING IRRIGATION SUBSIDIES IN ANDHRA PRADESH AND SOUTHERN INDIA: AN APPLICATION OF THE GSI METHOD FOR QUANTIFYING SUBSIDIES Page III Measuring Irrigation Subsidies in Andhra Pradesh and Southern India: An application of the GSI Method for quantifying subsidies FEBRUARY 2011 BY: K. Palanisami IWMI-TATA Water Policy Research Programme IWMI –South Asia Regional Office [email protected] Kadiri Mohan IWMI-TATA Water Policy Research Programme IWMI –South Asia Regional Office [email protected] Mark Giordano International Water Management Institute Colombo [email protected] Chris Charles Global Subsidies Initiative (GSI) International Institute for Sustainable Development [email protected] For the Global Subsidies Initiative (GSI) of the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) Geneva, Switzerland www.globalsubsidies.org THE GLOBAL SUBSIDIES INITIATIVE MEASURING IRRIGATION SUBSIDIES IN ANDHRA PRADESH AND SOUTHERN INDIA: AN APPLICATION OF THE GSI METHOD FOR QUANTIFYING SUBSIDIES Page IV © 2011, International Institute for Sustainable Development IISD contributes to sustainable development by advancing policy recommendations on international trade and investment, economic policy, climate change and energy, measurement and assessment, and natural resources management, and the enabling role of communication technologies in these areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Distributive Politics of Fertilizer Subsidy in India
    Distributive Politics of Fertilizer Subsidy in India Apurva Kothari International Relations Honors Thesis Advisor: Prof. Alastair M. Smith New York University Spring 2021 Kothari 2 Abstract Considerations of economic inequity should determine the distribution of subsidies from national to subnational governments. However, empirical evidence in the field of political economy diverges from this normative claim. Studies indicate that when the central incumbent holds discretionary power in allocating a private/public good, their political motivations are likely to determine the beneficiaries and the timing of the good’s delivery. This thesis seeks to contribute to this literature by exploring the agricultural, economic, and political determinants of fertilizer distribution in India. Particularly, it focuses on the center to state urea subsidy transfers, which amount to $6.09billion/annum (FY 2018-19) and constitute about 70% of total government expenditure on fertilizer subsidies. For opportunist incumbents, whose primary objective is to remain in office, the urea subsidy is the perfect “pork” which could be used to either buy turnout before elections or reward supporters post elections. Findings from my 22-year state-level panel data analysis reveal that a state’s income level is not a statistically significant determinant of subsidy allocation. Instead, states where national election races are close and co-partisans of the central incumbent lead the state government receive more subsidy per capita post-elections. Results of this study also indicate that there exists a robust political business cycle wherein pre-election austerity in subsidy distribution is followed by election year and post-election year fiscal expansion. A suboptimal pattern of urea distribution, which falls short of targeting those who need it the most, poses grave economic, agricultural, and environmental challenges for India.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Fossil Fuel Subsidies and Their Reform
    Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 72.250.241.86, on 23 Aug 2018 at 16:50:21, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/B8CB7D383F33AD9AF9CC82EB50A74DE5 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 72.250.241.86, on 23 Aug 2018 at 16:50:21, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/B8CB7D383F33AD9AF9CC82EB50A74DE5 THE POLITICS OF FOSSIL FUEL SUBSIDIES AND THEIR REFORM Fossil fuel subsidies strain public budgets and contribute to climate change and local air pollution. Despite widespread agreement among experts about the benefits of reforming fossil fuel subsidies, repeated international commitments to eliminate them, and valiant efforts by some countries to reform them, they continue to persist. This book helps explain this conundrum by exploring the politics of fossil fuel subsidies and their reform. Bringing together scholars and practitioners, the book offers new case studies both from countries that have undertaken subsidy reform and from those which have yet to do so. It explores the roles of various inter- governmental and non-governmental institutions in promoting fossil fuel subsidy reform at the international level, as well as conceptual aspects of fossil fuel subsidies. This is essential reading for researchers and practitioners and students of political science, international relations, law, public policy and environmental studies. This title is also available as Open Access. jakob skovgaard is Associate Professor in the Department of Political Science at Lund University (Sweden), undertaking research on EU and international cli- mate change policy.
    [Show full text]
  • LPG Access Schemes in India Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana
    www.swaniti.in LPG Access Schemes in India Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana The Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs approved the Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana on 10 March 2016. The scheme aims to provide free LPG connections to women from Below Poverty Line (BPL) households. With an initial earmarked allocation of Rs. 8000 crore1, it will target the provision of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) connections to 5 crore BPL households over three financial years (FY) from 2016 to 2019. Background 22% of India’s population lives below the poverty line2, with around 25.7% of the total households living in rural areas and 13.7% of the households in urban areas having incomes less than the defined poverty levels. Due to high upfront costs and LPG refill prices, Access to cooking gas (LPG) is limited for this section of the society being predominantly accessibleto middle class and affluent households living in the urban and semi-urban areas of the country.As per reply given by the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas in the Lok Sabha, the percentage of active registered consumers3 of LPG is 111% of the total number of households in urban areas. This statistic hints towards the existence of duplication i.e. multiple LPG connections per household in the urban areas. % LPG Coverage as per Census 2011 70% 65% LPG Coverage for urban households is 65% 60% 50% 40% Coverage for rural households stands at 11% 28.50% 30% 20% 11% 10% Overall LPG reach across India is 28.5% 0% India Rural Urban Source: Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No.
    [Show full text]